Aug
28, 2010:
To: Nina Arron,
Director of Public
Health
Protection
and Prevention
Tony
Amalfa, Manager Environmental
Health Programs
Gloria Rachamin, Toxicologist,
Dept of Public
Health Protection
and Prevention
Ministry of Health
and Long-Term Care.
cc.
Vivek Goel, Heather
Manson, Brian
Schwartz, Samir
Khalil,
Ontario Agency for
Health Promotion and
Prevention.
Further
to our
conversation in
your offices on
Aug 24, 2010 when
you met with
myself, Barrie
Trower, Magda
Havas and Patricia
Naylor, and
specifically
regarding the
Chief medical
Officer of Health
Arlene King’s
public statement
that “wireless
communications
systems do not
pose a public
health risk”:
Regarding
my comment in our
meeting that this
statement is
false, I am
attaching a
document to verify
this. It
is a review of the
health risks
associated with
wireless
communications
devices from The
Royal Society of
Canada. It was
commissioned by
Health Canada in
1999, and it will
inform you that
the opposite of
Dr. King’s
statement is true.
This
document from the
highest scientific
authority in our
country clearly
outlines that
biological effects
and health effects
do occur from
microwave
radiation used by
“wireless
communication
devices” including
the specific
frequencies
transmitted by our
school WiFi
devices, and at
well below the
established “safe”
guidelines printed
by Health Canada
in Safety Code 6,
based on the
thermal effect.
Specifically,
the Royal Society
of Canada
concludes that
well below thermal
effects the
microwaves used by
WiFi devices can
compromise the
integrity of the
blood-brain
barrier (Sect 6.6
pg 44).
It also
concludes that
microwave
radiation from
wireless
communication
devices at
intensities below
health Canada’s
Guidelines can
activate ODC
salivary enzymes
known to promote
cancer in humans.
(Sect
6.3.3 pg 41-42)
It
concludes that
microwaves at
these frequencies
and below Health
Canada’s
Guidelines disrupt
calcium
regulation. (Sect
6.2 pg 35)
It also
concludes that
there is “strong
evidence that
microwave
irradiation
produces
behavioural and
associated
biochemical
changes at or
below the
occupational
exposure limits in
SC6”. (Sect 6.7 pg
46)
We want
to ensure that we
are quoting “the
right information”
and we believe the
Royal Society of
Canada, in an
expert panel
report to Health
Canada is an
irrefutable source
on the subject in
this country. It
cites 468 peer
reviewed studies,
scientific reports
and high court
rulings. We
believe you will
consider this to
be sufficient
“weight of
evidence” to stand
by the Royal
Society’s
conclusion that
exposure to
microwaves can
indeed change
physical biology
at frequencies
transmitted using
WiFi devices, at
levels below
health Canada’s
limits. And that
it is currently
unknown whether
this is safe.
The Royal
Society’s
conclusions
strongly suggest
that blanketing an
entire school
system with
constant exposure
is an application
that will
predictably pose a
public health
“risk”, especially
among children.
This is
because scientific
consensus declares
that children are
among the most
vulnerable to
microwave
radiation (ICNIRP
General Approach
to Protection
against
Non-Ionizing
Radiation, pg
546).
Microwave
exposure limits in
Health Canada’s
Safety Code 6 as
you know are based
on heating the
skin of a grown
man after 6
minutes of
exposure to
microwaves, not
changing the
biological
function of a 4
year old girl
after microwave
exposure for 6
hours per day,
five days per week
over fourteen
years. These
limits have not
been
scientifically
set, there is no
consensus that
this is safe, and
therefore
statements
regarding their
safety are without
foundation.
No study
has been conducted
to determine
whether these
proven biological
changes are
expressing in
health effects. It
would contravene
accepted criteria
of scientific
ethics to expose
children to
harmful agents
such as microwaves
from Wifi in order
to prove harm or
no harm. Yet that
is exactly what we
are doing in
schools without
any notification
or informed
consent.
We have
observed heart
irregularities and
other symptoms
requiring
emergency room
treatment. We have
reported this to
our school Board,
the public health
unit of Simcoe
Muskoka District,
the provincial
Ministers of
Health and
Education, and the
Federal Ministers
of Health and
Industry. To date
we have been
dismissed by all
despite the
scientifically
accepted evidence
that biological
changes do occur
from the microwave
exposure to which
our children are
being subjected
daily.
Furthermore,
in response to Dr.
King`s statement
that the local
health unit is
unaware of this, I
am attaching
correspondence
dating back to May
of 2010 when I
provided detailed
information about
the problem and
requested an
investigation. You
are advised that
the statement that
“they are not
aware of any
illness in the
community that
could be traced
back to the use of
wireless systems
in the schools,”
is also false.
An
accurate statement
would be “The
local health unit
has received a
report of a
suspected illness
cluster that
parents believe is
associated with
microwave exposure
from a WiFi system
in their
children’s school.
The local health
unit has dismissed
the complaint
without
investigating.”
Finally,
I suggest that after
you and your staff
confirm the above
information that you
urgently recommend
Dr. King issue a new
statement based on
this critical
information, such
as:
“Microwaves
used in current WiFi
technology are shown
to produce
biological, medical
and behavioural
changes. These
changes can occur at
levels much lower
than Health Canada’s
current protection
guidelines. Exposure
to such microwave
radiation from WiFi
devices should be
avoided, especially
for children and
pregnant women,
until further
testing can prove it
to be safe.”
I
strongly request
this statement be
widely publicized
before school starts
on Sept 7th
of this year.
Sincerely,
Rodney
Palmer
Simcoe
County Safe School
Committee
|