Sandi
I have spent all week supporting a man in the North of England, trying
to get him moved out of a horrendous hotspot, trying to give him the
will to live, while TETRA Wi-Fi and other stuff is messing with his
reasoning and driving him to the edge.
I am very hopeful that he can move soon but meanwhile he is camping in
fields,
after a bad night on someone's settee and another in a caravan.
He has been to see two different doctors this week because a) he might not
have the illness he is medicated for or the medication might be making him
worse b) he has no energy, his left side seizes up, he can’t sleep or
eat a lot
of the time, he can’t think straight or talk clearly. This man was
working in
a caring profession before all this technology got to him. Neither of the
doctors carried out any investigative processes or helped at all.
A private doctor who treats EHS patients wanted a fee, although I
described the severe symptoms and said the poor man had no money
because he is unable to work. Nor do I. I have moved 3 times.
This man recovers a bit if he has the strength to leave his flat, which he
does not often have. He has improved mentally a great deal after
“sleeping rough” for two nights.
I have hope that his body might also heal if he can move to a safer place.
I phoned a few official departments to get him moved and the only person
who offered to go and see him, lent him a detector and bed net and to gave
him advice was an EHS lady who suffers greatly herself.
I didn’t want her to go because I am worried about her and mad, too,
about the way she is ignored and disrespected by authority. I just wanted
her to talk to him on the phone as she is closer to him with me being in
the
south of England, but her heart went out to him, as it does to others she
meets, and so she went. She told me how bad his flat was and she could
not stay in it. I really care about and love this lady and respect her very
much, yet we have never met.
There are others across the UK and some have died, even some
non-sensitives I knew who were sick, but of course I can’t prove the cause.
There are a few organisations set up to help us, but when it comes down to
it, it is ordinary people with no medical/scientific knowledge who are
the only
help for these people. They can only do as best they can and mostly it
is not
enough.
I have written the letter below which I intend to send out anywhere and
everywhere.
It was written from the heart but if any of you can improve it please
advise
me because I want people to take note. We are running out of time.
Here are notes I made about this man in the north of England
Whilst in his flat
He is impatiently irritable; unable to think straight, remember things or
organise his life; he has no energy/incentive and has deep mood swings
and depression; sometimes feels that he can't carry on - has had enough.
He can been desperate and demanding, tearful and far too negative,
seeing no hope. He has no physical energy and the whole left side of his
body is often numb. He has trouble with spelling, reading, concentrating
and his thoughts are scattered and seem to go in the same circles. He
does not seem to understand things you say. He seems to shut off
emotion or thought for others and has little understanding. He has
tendencies towards paranoia and verbal aggression.
(A man in Portsmouth experienced similar symptoms living in a 4th
floor flat level with a TETRA mast on a building 200 to 300 yds away
and near other technology. He moved to East Yorkshire close to the
sea and recovered completely. He returned to Portsmouth to visit his
relatives for a month and experienced the same problems. He is now
back in E Yorkshire and has no problems. This man was declared to
have psychological problems and was nearly sectioned because of his
violent outbursts. His marriage broke up irretrievably)
Away from his flat in an environment with less technology
He speaks clearly and lucidly, even shows signs of a sense of humour.
He apologises for what he considers to be bad behaviour when he is in
his flat. He is a little more positive, his energy levels improve. You can
have a normal conversation with him but it might be a bit fragmented at
times. I have experienced this three times when he has managed to
motivate himself to go further than the city centre.
Last night he was sleeping on a sofa in a flat where the detector G lent
him picked up only a hissing background noise. He phoned me from
there during the evening and we had a bit of a deep conversation about
Native American spirituality, which he has been researching when he is
able to. He was so different that it was quite an eye- opener.
G has experienced the technology going through his flat - she says it is
very bad.Front of the flat BT building with TETRA and other masts 200 yrds
from flat and a police station next door. The flats have metal entry doors.
At the back of his flat are tower blocks.
G counted at least 19 masts. She also said the flat is on the nearby
airport
flight path.
The letter I wrote
I work alone, but sometimes in conjunction with others, to raise awareness
for our children, the sick and those who are EHS (electro hypersensitive –
this has gone way past electrosensitivity now!)
My role must be worse than manning a Samaritan’s phone line because you
can’t advise these people to go to their doctors or seek help from any
authority. Why? Because although there is ample scientific proof of causal
harm, no medical staff in the UK are made aware of the known effects of
pulsed microwave radiation and no funding is available for training to help
these people who are sick or EHS.
The precautionary approach for children and those who might be more
vulnerable i.e. the sick/elderly/EHS, which was advised by Sir William
Stewart in his two reports of 2000 and 2004 on these newer technologies,
relies solely on emissions being below the ICNIRP guidelines, based on
the THERMAL effects. The proof of harm is found in research on the
BIOLOGICAL aspects of pulsed microwave radiation.
Two recent events give rise to question the safety of guidelines as the
only precautionary approach and this should be investigated fully (see
below)
I have been EHS for almost 5 years now and I have spoken to hundreds of
people who are sick and/or EHS. I have got over the anger and frustration
of my own situation but I can’t get my head and heart around the fact that
governments across the world are allowing this to happen purely for profit.
This could become a case of corporate manslaughter, as it gets worse with
each year and with each new technology.
I also believe that some of those non-sensitive people who can’t believe
what we, the EHS, are saying - that these technologies could be harming
some of them, too – will be affected eventually. I do wish they would
research these issues, if only for the sake of their children and family
pets.
Adults have a choice but children and animals don’t,nor do neighbours
who might be affected by these technologies.
The reports of cancer clusters around mobile phone masts and TETRA
in the UKare a warning, as is Sir William Stewart’s call for a review of
Wi-Fi, plus the growing numbers of people who are ES or EHS.
Why are the government advisors ignoring them all or referring to them
as “anecdotal evidence”? This is what we should all be asking ourselves.
People are sick and dying so how can doctors and medical staff help if
they have no knowledge of the effects of this technology? How
effective can monitoring of these cancer clusters by the Private Care
Trusts be if they have no knowledge or awareness?
The Health Protection Agency’s proposed research into Wi-Fi
around children will probably only show that Wi-Fi emissions are
below the ICNIRP guidelines unless the children are also monitored
for the know effects of pulsed microwave radiation.
Can we afford to risk our children for profit or convenience?
Can we afford to ignore the writing on the wall?
Mrs Sandi Lawrence
The Alaska legal precedent - The complete text of Alaska Supreme Court
OPINION No. 6139 ? July 6, 2007 is found at:
www.emrpolicy.org/litigation/case_law/index.htm
This precedent-setting case opens the door for any wireless industry or
maintenance worker who has been exposed to antenna arrays on the job
site that have not been shut off to file disability claims should they
suffer similar cognitive and neurological symptoms. US wireless service
providers are not required to document compliance with FCC RF safety
limits by on-site radiation measurements. Millions of workers occupy
worksites on a daily basis where operating antenna arrays are
camouflaged and where no workplace RF safety program is carried out.
Contact: Janet Newton - The EMR Policy Institute Tel: (802) 426-3035
Email: JNe...@emrpolicy.org
The Bio Initiative Report
Report of Concerns of Harm to Health below the Guidelines
Report: available at www.bioinitiative.org Title: BioInitiative: A
Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for
Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)
University of Albany, New York August 31 / Serious Public Health
Concerns Raised Over Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) from Power
Lines and Cell Phones .An international working group of scientists,
researchers and public health policy professionals (The BioInitiative
Working Group) has released its report on electromagnetic fields (EMF)
and health. It raises serious concern about the safety of existing
public limits that regulate how much EMF is allowable from power lines,
cell phones, and many other sources of EMF exposure in daily life.
A PDF version of this press release is available in PDF at:
http://www.bioinitiative.org/press_release/index.htm
Contact: E-mail - in...@bioinitiative.org
__._,_.___
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from
http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm