Final programme and Röösli's abstract for the next week's meeting in Paris

0 views
Skip to first unread message

news....@googlemail.com

unread,
Oct 16, 2009, 2:57:09 AM10/16/09
to
Dear Olle

I'm glad you'll participate to this event!

Regarding "Electromagnetic hypersensitivity" from Martin Röösli, I have
to clarify several points:

The first phrase is not true. EHS is not only related by individuals. In
the joined file OFSP 47...: the results of a study say that the relation
between EMF and health troubles were established by the patient in 75 %
of the cases, 11 % by the MP only, and 11 % by both. And 75 % of the MP
asked for information on what can cause EMF. Unfortunately, this
document is not in English, but you could find a German version at :
http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/strahlung/00053/02644/index.html?lang=fr
This is an official bulletin of our Federal Office of Public Health
published on November 21, 2005.

The second phrase is not true. EHS are not suffering from a wide range
of non-specific symptoms such as neurasthenic or skin symptoms. EHS
suffer from a wide range of different kind of electric, magnetic and
EMF, and from different high frequencies pulsed in different low
frequencies, which have SPECIFIC biochemical processes such cell
polarization - depolarization, cell proliferation or apoptosis,
oxydative/nitrosative stress, calcium efflux, etc. Furthermore, there
are WINDOW EFFECTS regarding the intensity, the frequency, the
pulsation, the exposition duration, etc.

Along this two last decades, with the spreading of different
technologies, it would be impossible to make an epidemiological study,
so much EMF growing, and we have no more CONTROL GROUP around the earth.

EHS is an expression created by the industry (as the nocebo effect...)
and spread around the world by the WHO, more specifically by M.
Repacholi, to transfer the responsibility to people instead of admit
that they are environmental victims. EHS was known from long time as
MICROWAVE SICKNESS or RADIO-FREQUENCY SICKNESS. About that, you could
download the 1972 rapport of the Naval Medical Research Institute in
USA, admitting biological effects referring to 2311 studies! You can
download it at: http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/AD750271

About the provocation studies, as far as I know, there are only two.
The 2003 TNO in Holland which find effects, and the TNO "duplication"
in Switzerland financed 40 % by the industry which find no effects and
revealed to the public on 6.6.6 (June 6, 2006). This study was faked
for several reasons, first with the protocol, and secondly because one
of the test's question was: are you exposed to 0, 1 or 10 V/m. People
who didn't point it was rejected of the study... But people could feel
worst with 1 than 10 V/m which have not the same effects and this
question introduce a psychological stress... And people in the 2003
TNO study was not so exposed in their daily life than 2006 Swiss TNO.

About the Swiss TNO study protocol, I have to add:

People who suffered headaches or CFS were excluded; (so most EHS was not
present... absurd !)

Smoker were excluded;

People drinking more than 3 coffees a day were excluded; (a recent
study shows that 4 cup a day reduce the risk to develop a colorectal
cancer...)

People drinking more than 10 doses of alcohol a week (one dose is 1 dl
of wine or one beer) were excluded; (some studies have shown that 2
doses by meet of red wine is good (so 28 doses a week), because it
contains anti-oxidants like polyphenols and melatonin...)

Shift workers were excluded; etc.

So, the Swiss study is just a DECEIT!

About Röösli, it seems to me he is to close of the industry. It seems
that he choose the conclusions of a study and after that, built the
study...

For example, I wrote to him on July first, 2008 asking why in his joined
study untitled:

Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms
of ill health: A systematic review; with 30 references cited, there is
absolutely NONE of the 45 references cited in the Bortkiewicz joined
study untitled: Subjective symptoms reported by people living in the
vicinity of cellular phone base stations: A review of the studies.

I never received an answer ! ! !

So I'm really not the best friend of Mr Röösli !

Spend a nice meeting in Paris! Organized by the "Foundation Health and
Radio-Frequencies", one of the multiple organizations founded by the
industry...


Philippe Hug
PS: copy to all

1. Program_FSRF_091020.pdf
2. ROOSLI_Abstract_EHS_FSRF.pdf
3. OFSP 47 Enquete aupres des medecins.pdf
4. Roeoesli mar 2008 review full study.pdf
5. Bortkiewicz 2004 full study.pdf


[ http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=EHS
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=apoptosis
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=oxydative
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=nitrosative
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=calcium+efflux
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=nocebo
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=MICROWAVE+SICKNESS
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=CFS
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=World+Health+Organization
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Repacholi ]

Program_FSRF_091020.pdf
ROOSLI_Abstract_EHS_FSRF.pdf
OFSP 47 Enquete aupres des medecins.pdf
Roeoesli mar 2008 review full study.pdf
Bortkiewicz 2004 full study.pdf

news....@googlemail.com

unread,
Oct 17, 2009, 2:41:21 AM10/17/09
to mobilfunk_...@googlegroups.com
Dear Olle,

For Paris, you could also use the following and attached papers :

The list of biological studies (not exhaustive) available on January
2005, compiled by Henry C. Lai.

"Radiation research" the cult of negative study, published on July
2006 in Microwave News.

About the same subject, Röösli was one of the scientifics who published
on January 2007 in Environmental Health Perspectives the study untitled
: Source of Funding and Results of Studies of Health Effects of Mobile
Phone Use: Systematic Review of Experimental Studies.

It was not done with the same studies as the ones published on July
2006 in Microwave News, but demonstrate similar conclusion. Those should
have filled the first page of all newspapers. But it was not the case.
Industry own also the medias...

So I don't understand Röösli repeating: the mechanisms are not known, we
need more studies, we don't know what are the results of long term
exposition, etc.

And I wish to win that battle ! You have to ! You can do it ! This is
urgent !


Philippe Hug

1. Compile Henry Lai 2005.pdf
2. Cult of Negative Results jul 2006.pdf
3. Anke Huss Röösli review.pdf

PS: copy to all

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Olle Johansson <Olle.Jo...@ki.se> a écrit :

Dear Philippe,

I have printed out your excellent comments below; will use them in Paris!

Best regards Yours Olle

(Olle Johansson, assoc. prof. The Experimental Dermatology Unit
Department of Neuroscience Karolinska Institute
171 77 Stockholm Sweden

&

Professor The Royal Institute of Technology
100 44 Stockholm Sweden)

--------

Biological effects referring to 2311 studies


Electromagnetic hypersensitivity

EHS is an expression created by the industry (as the nocebo effect...)
and spread around the world by the WHO, more specifically by M.

Repacholi, to transfer the responsibility to people instead of admitting

that they are environmental victims. EHS was known from long time as
MICROWAVE SICKNESS or RADIO-FREQUENCY SICKNESS. About that, you could

download the 1972 report of the Naval Medical Research Institute in USA,
admitting biological effects referring to 2311 studies ! You can

http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=AD750271&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf

Philippe Hug
PS: copy to all


Informant: Martin Weatherall


Compile Henry Lai 2005.pdf
Cult of Negative Results jul 2006.pdf
Anke Huss Röösli review.pdf
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages