Hi Peter,
For the second question.
1. I do use the cloze card type.
2. Please add Latex support for that heuristic! I really really need it! (At worse, I will simply use an old version of mnemosyne)
3. To answer this question" And if the old Mnemosyne version gave much more room to the question, the chances that you accidentally see the next line of the proof should be higher, and not lower?" No. I never see the next line of the proof. I always made sure that the only the statement is seen and no line of the proof. By adding empty lines on top of the statement if needed.
The current problem I have with the new interface is that when I scroll down to see the lines where I am supposed to be at, I can't see the statement I am trying to prove because I have so little space to see the question in the interface.
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 13 January 2019 09:21:27 UTC+1, Paul wrote:Hi,
>
I make sure that I can see the statement of the theorem
>
> For your second question, at some point our GUI library switched to a different html rendering library, which meant we could no longer determine the exact size of the question or answer. So, we had to resort to a heuristic. As far as I reccall, this heuristic currently does not support latex images, but it shouldn't be to hard to add this. I'm still a bit confused on how exactly you're using the cards for this though, with respect to scrolling. Do you use the cloze card type?And if the old Mnemosyne version gave much more room to the question, the chances that you accidentally see the next line of the proof should be higher, and not lower?