Say I have the following question tag / hierarchy database:
- Unit VI
- Git and Antiemetic Drugs
- Antimicrobial Agents
- Question 1.1 <- tag:side-effects
- Question 1.2 <- tag:uses
- Question 1.3 <- tag:timing
- H2 Receptors
- Question 2.1 <- tag:side-effects
- Question 2.2. <- tag:uses
- Question 2.3 <- tag:timing
- PPIs
- Question 3.1 <- tag:side-effects
- Question 3.2 <- tag:users
- Question 3.3 <- tag:timing
So in the tag / hierarchy above, you might have the following tags for example:
Question 1.1's tags would be: "Unit VI::Git and Antiemetic Drugs::Antimicrobial Agents,side-effects"
Question 1.2's tags would be: "Unit VI::Git and Antiemetic Drugs::Antimicrobial Agents,uses"
Question 1.3's tags would be: "Unit VI::Git and Antiemetic Drugs::Antimicrobial Agents,timing"
Question 2.1's tags would be: "Unit VI::Git and Antiemetic Drugs::H2 Receptors,side-effects"
Question 2.2's tags would be: "Unit VI::Git and Antiemetic Drugs::H2 Receptors,uses"
Question 2.3's tags would be: "Unit VI::Git and Antiemetic Drugs::H2 Receptors,timing"
Question 3.1's tags would be: "Unit VI::Git and Antiemetic Drugs::PPIs,side-effects"
Question 3.2's tags would be: "Unit VI::Git and Antiemetic Drugs::PPIs,uses"
Question 3.3's tags would be: "Unit VI::Git and Antiemetic Drugs::PPIs,timing"
So then if I wanted to study all the PPI questions, in the main menu I would go to "Cards->(De)activate Cards", and bring up the "(De)activate Cards" dialog.
And check off the top of the PPI category, and I would end up with:
- Question 3.1
- Question 3.2
- Question 3.3
But, lets say that I wanted to study only the cards that were in the PPI category and that are tagged with side-effects; then what do I do? The expected output would be:
...but if I check off the PPIs category, and the side-effects tag, I end up instead with:
- Question 3.1
- Question 3.2
- Question 3.3
This seems to indicate to me that I need an AND for matching instead of an OR...is there a way to do this? Can I use both the "having any of these tags" and "not having any of these tags" together to achieve this?
Thank you,
Andrew J. Leer