Hello mnemosyne-users.
How high retention rate (as reported by mnemosyne statistics) do you get on average when reviewing cards? I tend to get around 80% and review between 100 and 150 cards a day. Most of my cards are used to learn languages.
I would expect that spending more time reviewing 0 and 1-grade cards before grading them 2 or higher will improve the retention rate. But this also take time, and maybe it would be smarter using that time to read and speak the language I'm trying to learn.
Do anyone have thoughts to share about this topic?
I aim at a retention rate no lower than 95%.
If too many items are forgotten, I know that it is likely they will require a lot of time also in the future. I ask myself:
· Are they badly formulated? If yes, rephrase/ redo
· Do I have insufficient "surrounding" and "supporting" knowledge? If yes: provide this knowledge
· Some “hard-to-learn” items I simply give a "Priority-2"-tag and put on hold until I am better prepared for this piece of knowledge
· Other items I re-formulate (would be nice if Mnemosyne allowed "copy-item" and/ or "Reset learning")
· I may supplement the trouble-item with a different approach (e.g. use picture/ sound).
· Some of these "hard to learn" items I write down (yes, good old handwriting) and look through every now and then. ( I have even made paper-based flashcards) . I find that changing the learning-context can do wonders... An idea I got just now: Snapshot of the handwritten item, insert into.. etc ☺
/ Henrik in Oslo
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mnemosyne-proj-u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mnemosyne-proj-users/-/1DZM6-XbEQYJ.