Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Supreme Court Poised To Deliver Victory for School Choice in Religious Vouchers Case

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Merry Christmas

unread,
Dec 25, 2021, 11:25:03 PM12/25/21
to
Biden administration fails to get case tossed on technicality

The Supreme Court looked likely on Wednesday to strike down a Maine
law that excludes religious schools from a voucher program,
strengthening parental rights to use taxpayer dollars at faith-based
schools.

The Biden administration is trying to get the case tossed on a
technicality to protect its teachers’ union allies. A majority of
the Court was unpersuaded by the attempt during oral arguments
Wednesday and viewed Maine’s law as biased against religion.

"[One] neighbor says, ‘We’re going to send our children to secular
private school.’ They get the benefit. The next-door neighbor says,
‘Well we want to send our children to a religious private school.’
They don’t get the benefit. That's just discrimination on the basis
of religion right there at the neighborhood level," Justice Brett
Kavanaugh said.

Progressives are facing multiple prospective defeats on priority
issues at the Court this term. The justices have signaled that they
could overturn Roe v. Wade and expand the right to carry concealed
firearms by June of next year. Despite the rightward trend, interest
in court packing seems to be dissipating among establishment
Democrats after President Joe Biden’s judicial reform commission
refused to endorse court expansion or term limits in its final
report.

School choice advocates are backing the attack on Maine’s law amid
mounting frustration with public schools. Long-term suspension of
in-person instruction and curricula changes on sensitive subjects
like race and sex are fueling a nationwide spike in homeschooling
and private school enrollment. The nation’s largest teachers’ unions
filed amicus briefs supporting Maine’s law, and they’ve been
outspoken in opposing vouchers on the grounds that they siphon
taxpayer dollars out of public schools and dilute labor power.

Maine offers tuition assistance to families in the sparsely
populated northern and western regions of the state, where some
school districts cannot maintain a public high school. Affected
students can pick a different public school, or enroll in a private
school on the state’s dime. Under Maine law, eligible private
schools must be non-sectarian and cannot evangelize their students
in a particular faith.

The two plaintiff families in Wednesday’s case want to use state
money to send their children to religious schools, Temple Academy in
Waterville and Bangor Christian School. The Court said in 2017 and
again in 2020 that faith-based institutions can’t be disqualified
from government programs available to everyone just because of their
religious affiliation. Maine tried to distinguish its program from
those cases Wednesday by saying its law aims to prevent taxpayer
financing of formal religious instruction.

That distinction didn’t get much traction with the justices. What
matters, several justices said, is that the states can’t disfavor
faith-based groups once it makes a public benefit available to all-
comers.

"Our case law suggests that discriminating against all religions …
is discriminatory just as it is discriminatory to, say, exclude the
Catholic and the Jewish and include the Protestant," Kavanaugh said.

Several justices were bothered that Maine allows a few nominally
religious private schools to participate in the voucher program.
Despite their religious affiliation, those schools are eligible for
vouchers as long as they don’t evangelize or lead their student
bodies in regular liturgy. Chief Justice John Roberts said different
religions place different priorities on evangelizing and communal
worship, so Maine’s policy penalizes a particular set of religious
practices.

"We have said that that is the most basic violation of the First
Amendment religion clauses," Roberts told Maine deputy attorney
general Christopher Taub.

The Biden administration and the Court’s liberal justices looked for
ways to toss the case or limit its reach.

Justice Department lawyer Malcolm Stewart noted that Temple Academy
and Bangor Christian have not indicated that they will participate
in Maine’s tuition assistance program. He said the schools
themselves wouldn’t have a basis for suing unless they affirmatively
declared they will take state money. It would be strange, he said,
to let parents bring a suit when the schools are undecided. He
pushed the Court to dismiss the case on that basis, but a majority
of the Court did not appear persuaded.

Justice Elena Kagan seemed to say the Court could limit its decision
to the unique facts of Wednesday’s case. Public education is
available almost everywhere in the country, Kagan said. The only
reason Maine crafted this program is to accommodate "a very small
number of students living in isolated areas," she said.

A decision focused on the facts on the ground in Maine would limit
its precedential value for future voucher cases, a hollow school
choice victory the Court’s liberals might be willing to live with.

A decision in Wednesday’s case, No. 20-1088 Carson v. Makin, is
expected by summer 2022.


https://freebeacon.com/courts/supreme-court-poised-to-deliver-
victory-for-school-choice-in-religious-vouchers-case/
0 new messages