I would like to add to the agenda that we are curious to learn from Nominating exactly who it has nominated so far to be on PSCC as one of the "at least four members or attenders." We would like to see this information in advance of the meeting I should think. This should be on the agenda *before* we're asked to agree to the job description, so we know who among us are the real members or attenders, with the rest of us just welcome to be there.
Absolutely I am not Multnomah's Liaison to AFSC, technically or otherwise and should not be referred to that way.
I am one of AFSC's Liaisons to meetings and churches in West Region. AFSC is in charge of my appointment at this point. [1]
This role would not automatically put me on anyone's P&SC committee I shouldn't think (that was part of the problem: the meeting's own position was made unrecognizable by a "proposal" to drop the committee on which the liaison formerly served).
I'm fine if I am not one of the "official" members, even if I continue to own the listserv for awhile longer. However, the job description itself mandates at least four members.
Example of what it could be: Debbie Averill (clerk), David Chandler, Rick Seifert, Ron Marson (all invited to give input into the meeting time, so that implies Ron and Rick are at least in the "anyone is welcome" category, but has Nominating put them on the slate?).
If Nominating hasn't yet bothered to identify these members, then I think agreeing to the Job Description is premature, as Nominating itself may not take it seriously enough for it to matter.
Nominating is the most powerful committee in Multnomah, with the power to "propose" shelving a committee, after which, it has the power to simply stop nominating to that committee even when Oversight objects [2] -- so it's waaaay more than a proposal when Nominating "proposes".[2] So unless we see evidence it's following this description, then I don't think the rest of us should spend a lot of time on it.
Kirby
[1] AFSC sends me lots of positive feedback plus I'm pushing for a private
ceremony in the AFSC office thanking the Luchini family, not members of our meeting, for joining business meeting on June 22 and saving our
committee with that threshing session proposal, complete with a framed award. Quakerism is the better for it. Thank you Luchinis! Lets wait until Carol gets here in May.
[2] for example, at the June 22 2014 business meeting, when Jeff Lumb, clerk of Oversight, said he was "uncomfortable" with Nominating's proposal, that didn't keep Nominating from stopping all efforts to rebuild the committee. On the contrary, we had to spend hours and hours organizing the threshing session the Luchinis proposed, have people like Metcalfs, Desiree etc. to show up, and say No again. Even then, Nominating sat on hits hands until we consented to have the job description rewritten, even though Carl said in the threshing session the committee with "still alive" (ergo vivisection was performed on a living committee by another committee deemed more authoritative for some reason). So now, if Nominating cannot tell us who the four members are, it may decide we're "dysfunctional" again and try again to shut us down again. What's to stop them? They have more power than any committee I've seen in my 56 years as a Quaker.
====
Multnomah Monthly Meeting Peace & Social Concerns Committee
Membership:
The Peace & Social Concerns Committee comprises at least four members and/or attenders of the meeting. They should have a special concern for issues of social justice, the environment and peace. The committee and its clerk are chosen by the business meeting after recommendation by the nominating committee. Members should be Friends with knowledge of how to effect social change, particularly by working with Quaker organizations. AFSC and FCNL liaisons are ex-officio members of the committee. Members of the committee serve staggered three-year terms.
Meetings:
Committee meetings are open and held monthly or as needed. Anyone is welcome to attend either to bring a concern, or to give spiritual and active support to an on-going project or concern. Decisions will be made using Quaker process that arrives at the “sense of the committee.”