Dear Prof. Fang,
Thank you for sharing Redbird; this tool is very powerful!
I’m not sure if I’m posting in the correct group, as I couldn’t find a dedicated group for Redbird users. I would like to ask whether it is possible to create a detector with a specific radius in Redbird. From the documentation, it seems detectors are defined by their position (cfg.detpos).
Many thanks for your help.
Best regards,
Charlyhi Charly,
before we have a dedicated redbird mailing list, feel free to use either mmc-users or mcx-users mailing list for questions
yes, redbird's detector readings are point-based interpolations.
They do not have a radius lke in mcx/mmc. Because the finite
element method used in redbird uses linear basis functions for
each element and interpolations are built-in to the forward
models, in a way, it is not necessary for redbird's detector to
have a radius in order perform averaging.
another difference is that redbird's detector values (detphi) are fluence values (interior light); they are different from the diffuse reflectance that mcx/mmc produced from the detected photons (exiting light) but they are related (see https://github.com/fangq/mcx/blob/master/mcxlab/examples/demo_diffuse_reflectance_validation.m).
for the purpose of DOT reconstructions, the conversion between fluence and dref is done as part of the calibration.
let me know if these are clear.
Qianqian
Charly --
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mmc-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mmc-users+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mmc-users/5a064ff1-03d3-4dce-b0a6-4c5b2280e64dn%40googlegroups.com.
Thank you for your answer, it makes sense to me.
If I understand correctly, Redbird’s detector values can be converted into diffuse reflectance using the calibration procedure described in Section 2.6 of the manual: https://github.com/fangq/redbird/blob/master/doc/Redbird_manual.pdf