You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ml-...@googlegroups.com
Dear colleagues: We cordially invite you to attend the 7th MSDM workshop, which is held in conjunction with AAMAS 2012 (the 11th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems), in Valencia, Spain.
It is an excellent opportunity for you to absorb the latest advancements in multiagent sequential decision-making research, and to actively discuss a variety of exciting on-going works. This year, we are extremely fortunate to have Prof. Makoto Yokoo as an invited speaker and he will give a talk regarding “Repeated Games with Private Monitoring: A New Frontier for POMDP Researchers.”
It will take place on June 5, 2012, preceding the AAMAS conference. Please join us and many of others in this community. We look forward to seeing you there!
Best regards, The MSDM 2012 Organizers ================================================================== CALL FOR PARTICIPATION AAMAS 2012 Workshop Multiagent Sequential Decision Making Under Uncertainty (MSDM) ================================================================== The Seventh Workshop in the MSDM series June 5, 2012, 9:00am - 6:30pm Valecia, Spain http://gaips.inesc-id.pt/~switwicki/msdm2012/
Location & Organization ------ The 7th MSDM workshop is held in conjunction with AAMAS-2012 (the 11th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems), in Valencia, Spain. It will take place on June 5, 2012, preceding the AAMAS conference.
Workshop Overview ------ In sequential decision making, an agent's objective is to choose actions, based on its observations of the world, in such a way that it expects to optimize its performance measure over the course of a series of such decisions. In environments where action consequences are non-deterministic or observations incomplete, Markov decision processes (MDPs)and partially observable MDPs (POMDPs) serve as the basis for principled approaches to single-agent sequential decision making. Extending these models to systems of multiple agents has become the subject of an increasingly active area of research over the past decade and a variety of models have emerged (e.g., the MMDP, Dec-POMDP, MTDP, I-POMDP, and POSG). The high computational complexity of these models has driven researchers to develop multiagent planning and learning methods that exploit the structure present in agents' interactions, methods that provide efficient approximate solutions, and methods that distribute computation among the agents.
The MSDM workshop serves several purposes. The primary purpose is to bring together researchers in the field of MSDM to present and discuss new work and preliminary ideas. Moreover, we aim to identify recent trends, to establish important directions for future research, and to discuss some of the topics mentioned below such as challenging application areas (e.g., cooperative robotics, distributed sensor and/or communication networks, decision support systems) and suitable evaluation methodologies. Finally, a goal of the workshop is to make the field more accessible to newcomers, by seeking to bring order in the large number of models and methods that have been introduced over the last decade.
Invited Talk ------ Prof. Makoto Yokoo (Kyushu University)
Short Bio: Makoto Yokoo received the B.E. and M.E. degrees in electrical engineering, in 1984 and 1986, respectively, from the University of Tokyo, Japan, and the Ph.D. degree in information and communication engineering in 1995, from the University of Tokyo, Japan. From 1986 to 2004, he was a research scientist of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT). He is currently a Professor of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University. His research interests include multi-agent systems, constraint satisfaction, and mechanism design among self-interested agents.
He served as a general co-chair of International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems in 2007 (AAMAS-2007), and as a program co-chair of AAMAS-2003. He is currently the president of International Foundation for Autonomous Agent and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS). He received the ACM SIGART Autonomous Agents Research Award in 2004, and the IFAAMAS influential paper award in 2010.
Details: “Repeated Games with Private Monitoring: A New Frontier for POMDP Researchers”
Repeated games provide a formal and quite general framework to examine why self-interested agents to cooperate in a long-term relationship. Formally, repeated games refer to a class of models where the same set of agents repeatedly play the same game, called the 'stage game', over a long (typically, infinite) time horizon. The case where agents can perfectly observe each other's actions (perfect monitoring) is extensively studied; there exist rich theoretical results including the well-known folk theorem, which shows that any cooperative outcome is possible under several mild assumptions. However, in reality, long term relationships are often plagued by imperfect monitoring, i.e., agents cannot directly observe each other's actions; they observe signals that imperfectly reveal what actions have been taken.
Repeated games with imperfect monitoring are classified into two categories: the case of public monitoring, where players commonly observe a public signal, and the case of private monitoring. where each player observes a signal that is not observable to others. The imperfect public monitoring case shares many features with the perfect monitoring case, and we now have a good understanding of how it works. In contrast, the imperfect private monitoring case is still in its infancy. However, quite recently, we found that there exists a strong relationship between the equilibrium analysis in the imperfect private monitoring case and POMDP planning. In this talk, I sketch the main results of repeated games and describe how we can utilize POMDP techniques to analyze an equilibrium in the imperfect private monitoring case.
Accepted Papers ------ POMDPs in OpenMarkov and ProModelXML Manuel Arias, Francisco Javier Díez, Miguel Ángel Palacios-Alonso, Mar Yebra, and Jorge Fernández
Solving Finite Horizon Decentralized POMDPs by Distributed Reinforcement Learning Bikramjit Banerjee, Jeremy Lyle, Landon Kraemer, and Rajesh Yellamraju
Planning Delayed-Response Queries and Transient Policies under Reward Uncertainty Robert Cohn, Edmund Durfee, and Satinder Singh
Improved Solution of Decentralized MDPs through Heuristic Search Jilles Dibangoye, Christopher Amato, and Arnaud Doniec
Automated Equilibrium Analysis of Repeated Games with Private Monitoring: A POMDP Approach Yongjoon Joe, Atsushi Iwasaki, Michihiro Kandori, Ichiro Obara and Makoto Yokoo
Exploiting Sparse Interactions for Optimizing Communication in Dec-MDPs Francisco S. Melo, Matthijs Spaan, and Stefan Witwicki
Tree-based Pruning for Multiagent POMDPs with Delayed Communication Frans Oliehoek and Matthijs Spaan
Strategic Behaviour Under Constrained Autonomy Zinovi Rabinovich
Prioritized Shaping of Models for Solving DEC-POMDPs Pradeep Varakantham, William Yeoh, Prasanna Velagapudi, Katia Sycara, and Paul Scerri
Coordinated Multi-Agent Learning for Decentralized POMDPs Chongjie Zhang and Victor Lesser
Topics ------ Multiagent sequential decision making comprises (1) problem representation, (2) planning, (3) coordination, and (4) learning. The MSDM workshop addresses this full range of aspects. Topics of particular interest include: - Challenging conventional assumptions ...model specification: where do the models come from? ...what is an appropriate level of abstraction for decision making? - Novel representations, algorithms and complexity results - Comparisons of algorithms - Relationships between models and their assumptions - Decentralized vs. centralized planning approaches - Online vs. offline planning - Communication and coordination during execution - Dealing with... ...large numbers of agents ...large numbers of / continuous states, observations and actions ...long decision horizons. - (Reinforcement) learning in partially observable multiagent systems - Cooperative, competitive, and self-interested agents - Application domains - Benchmarks and evaluation methodologies - Standardization of software - High-level principles High-level principles in MSDM: past trends and future directions
Organizing Committee -------------------- Prashant DoshiUniversity of Georgia Stefan WitwickiINESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico Jun-young KwakUniversity of Southern California Frans A. OliehoekMaastricht University Akshat KumarUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst
Program Committee ----------------- Christopher AmatoAptima, Inc. Raphen BeckerGoogle Daniel BernsteinUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst Aurélie BeynierUniversity Pierre and Marie Curie (Paris 6) Alan CarlinUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst Brahim Chaib-DraaLaval University Georgios ChalkiadakisTechnical University of Crete François CharpilletINRIA Ed DurfeeUniversity of Michigan Alessandro FarinelliUniversity of Verona Alberto FinziUniversita di Napoli Claudia GoldmanGM Advanced Technical Center Israel Michail LagoudakisTechnical University of Crete Janusz MareckiIBM T.J. Watson Research Center Francisco S. MeloINESC-ID Lisboa Hala MostafaBBN Technologies Abdel-Illah MouaddibUniversit de Caen Enrique Munoz De CoteINAOE, Mexico Brenda NgLawrence Livermore National Laboratory Praveen ParuchuriCarnegie Mellon University David PynadathUniversity of Southern California Xia QuUniversity of Georgia Zinovi RabinovichBar-Ilan University Anita RajaUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte Paul ScerriCarnegie Mellon University Jiaying ShenSRI International, Inc. Matthijs SpaanDelft University of Technology Katia SycaraCarnegie Mellon University Karl TuylsMaastricht University Pradeep VarakanthamSingapore Management University Jianhui WuAmazon Makoto YokooKyushu University Chongjie ZhangUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst Shlomo ZilbersteinUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst