Edward Sanford Sutton, III
unread,Feb 14, 2026, 1:01:58 PM (6 days ago) Feb 14Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ques...@freebsd.org, Edward Sanford Sutton, III
I assume its a bug in pkg as I doubt they meant to separate the
package name and the comparative status with 'zero' or more characters.
Passing that truncated list to poudriere will have poudriere rebuild
the out of date ports and any ports between an updated dependency and an
updated dependent will be rebuild as it determines but you will be
skipping rebuilding all other dependent ports that did not appear in the
list or as something inbetween ones on the list. Port maintainers will
try to bump the version of dependent ports but being human and detecting
all dependent ports being complicated can lead to issues with that. If
you change any options that add more dependencies then those are ports
that are likely to accidentally not get version bumped.
If you pass poudriere the list of installed ports then it will likely
rebuild more than what is needed but as a result should always rebuild
even these missed version bump cases.