I wonder if the Cinestyle color profile would yield any better
results.
It's specifically designed to provide more detail in shadows and
highlights, which, aside from sensor grain should help.
Brian
On Oct 10, 5:03 pm, James Donnelly <
jamesjdonne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I already did a related test, but since my subject matter was hugely
> un-interesting, and purely to compare the noise, I didn't bother posting
>
> To my surprise, the EV boost does seem to yield better results than boosting
> in post. The noise prior to neat video is less course, and responds better
> to de-noising (neat video), especially the chroma noise, so I have now
> confirmed for myself that it is a worthwhile feature.
>
> These shots were taken with a dim lamp at f/11. Obviously I'm trying to
> create a really noisy shot. I only went to 1EV because I'm interested in a
> slight boost for now.
>
> First, a 1EV boost:
>
>
http://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-j0hc8wNN9Gs/TpNTCK-CljI/AAAAAAAACfo...
>
> And with a boost in post (Sony Vegas 10 Brightness/Contrast plugin):
>
>
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-beh0yRAd14s/TpNTBjisG-I/AAAAAAAACf...
>
> I hope these shots are slightly better than useless.
>
> On 10 October 2011 19:24, Alex <
broscutama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Nice. What would be interesting to see is a video at ISO 6400, without
> > display gain, but boosted in post, compared to one recorded at ISO
> > 409600 equivalent.
>
> > You can also try some temporal denoising here. Maybe Frame Merger from
> > the other thread (
http://bit.ly/frame-merger) will help.