Cognitive dissonance and integrity of Visioneers' oral and written remarks concluding their work with MKPCO

[Compassionate Tortoise]

The following questions are addressed primarily to
Andrew Hogan and secondarily to Mike Lythgoe.

Andrew, what did you hope to accomplish by stating that the Transition
Team was/is "uncoachable"?
What effect did you want to have on the members of the Roundtable by
throwing out this comment and then refusing to discuss the matter any
further? Do you think your remark would have a positive or negative
effect on the presentation of the TLT to the Roundtable? Are you
willing to clear with those members of the Roundtable who judge your
words and actions to be out of integrity with your verbal and written
remarks, which are resoundingly positive, commending the TLT's work
and the outstanding work done by all parties involved in the visioning
and implementation processes?

Mike, where do you stand on each of the questions posed above?

Jeffrey
Compassionate Tortoise