Hi Christoph,
I ran the --quick version with the --verbose option. The temp_baitfile.fasta file from the iteration0 seems to be ok (18,415bp). The output of the initial-mapping-testpool-to-perna-mt_out_testpool.unpadded.fasta is not ok (I copied below a part of it but it is al xxx's till the end).
See in the attached file the output of the run with the --quick and --verbose option.
Many thanks,
Regina
>KM655841.1_bb
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
[….]
On 05 Dec 2016, at 13:21, Christoph Hahn <
C.H...@hull.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi Regina,
That's indeed a bit strange. If you are using a mt genome of the same species, you won't need the initial mapping assembly. You might as well just use the `--quick` option. Anyway, now that you've already done it, can you please double-check that a bait file has been created and maybe look into it to check if it contains a reasonable sequence. The file should be called `temp_baitfile.fasta` in your iteration 1 directory. This is the fasta sequence (without ambiguities) extracted from the result (maf file) of the initial assembly. Could be something has gone wrong already there. Maybe the file is empty or otherwise weird, that would explain why no reads seem to be baited. Check out also the result from the initial mapping assembly. Should be in the directory called `your project_d_results` and the file should be called `your_project_out.unpadded.fasta` or something like that.
In parallel can you try to rerun MITObim with mira 4.0.2 and the `--quick` option? I know you already tried, but the this time please specify the verbose (`-v`), which should result in more detailed output from the baiting step. Can you save the output to a txt file and send it over, in case it fails?
Thanks!
Cheers,
Christoph