BRAINWASH-CHECK POLL: Obama vs Limbaugh

POLL -- Would You Like to See 20 Million Shirts Sold
Mocking Rush Limbaugh... While Creating Thousands of
American Jobs in The Process... Stimulating the American
Economy in a Positive Hilarious Entrepreneurial Way?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/b4982f416ad0d450

http://RejectTheBrainwash.com

$Zero

unread,

Mar 27, 2009, 4:53:49 PM3/27/09

to

POLL -- [Brainwash Check]

Who wants the DOW to fail more?

1. President Obama

2. Rush Limbaugh

3. Both?

...

Background:

Rush Limbaugh FINALLY Talks About the DOW Again!
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/26a5337a25396506

http://twitter.com/DittoWatch/status/1402353094

...

-$Zero...

$30 Lottery Tickets!
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/1c477cb50ffa6412

http://RejectTheBrainwash.com

dearcilla

unread,

Mar 28, 2009, 1:39:25 AM3/28/09

to

On Mar 27, 2:02 pm, "$Zero" <zeroi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BRAINWASH-CHECK POLL: Obama vs Limbaughhttp://twitter.com/DittoWatch/status/1402353094

>
> Who wants the DOW to fail more?
>
> 1. President Obama
>
> 2. Rush Limbaugh
>
> 3. Both?
>
> (please answer yourself & then retweet)
>

1) The Dow is not an acronym; if you want to use an acronym, refer to
the DJIA.
2) When the Dow _falls_, it is not _failing_. It's doing what it's
supposed to do; providing an index of industrial stocks.

$Zero

unread,

Mar 28, 2009, 4:14:54 AM3/28/09

to

Gawd.

so when that index is lower it's no different than if it's higher?

that would make it rather meaningless as an index, no?

but thanks for educating moi on the minutia of the financial
vernacular.

i always equate references to the Dow with the DJIA.

i imagine i'm not alone in that semantic understanding.

sorry for incorrectly "capitalizing" a word/name that like Dow.

in any case, who do you think really wants the American economy to
fail?

Obama or Limbaugh?

or both?

you never answered the spirit of the question.

-$Zero...

Rush Limbaugh FINALLY Talks About the DOW Again!
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/26a5337a25396506

Can a single tee shirt
create thousands of jobs?
http://www.Yes-It-Can.net

dearcilla

unread,

Mar 28, 2009, 12:37:07 PM3/28/09

to

Neither wants the Dow to fall. Both would like to blame it on someone
else when it does fall.

dearcilla

unread,

Mar 28, 2009, 12:45:48 PM3/28/09

to

On Mar 28, 4:14 am, "$Zero" <zeroi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> but thanks for educating moi on the minutia of the financial
> vernacular.

It's "minutiae", not minutia.

I.B.Larfin

unread,

Mar 28, 2009, 1:53:22 PM3/28/09

to

dearcilla <dear...@gmail.com> wrote:

I think that if I had the minutions I might shoot the both of you for
your tiresomeness.

--
"I slaughtered this horse last Tuesday. I think it's startin' to turn."
-- Washington Hogwallop

$Zero

unread,

Mar 28, 2009, 2:47:27 PM3/28/09

to

wrong answer.

Limbaugh wants it to fail.

Obama does not.

Limbaugh is contempt-mongering asshole who benefits greatly from
massive problems.

Obama is NOT a contempt-mongering asswipe.

and he was handily winning his bid for the presidency long before the
financial collapse began (due to eight grueling years of Rush's
party's irresponsible self-serving fraud-enabling failure policies).

HTH

-$Zero...

POLL -- Was Rush Limbaugh Wrong to Hope Obama Fails?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/00616d201dcdaa8c

dearcilla

unread,

Mar 29, 2009, 12:59:04 AM3/29/09

to

On Mar 28, 2:47 pm, "$Zero" <zeroi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> and he was handily winning his bid for the presidency long before the
> financial collapse began

I don't think he was. There was a point where he was close to even
with McCain, and it looked like it might be close, although that
turned out to be his low point.

Obama benefits from a rapid recovery, but not so rapid it can't be
attributed to his policies.

Limbaugh benefits from a Democratic presidency, regardless. At least
as long as the government doesn't suppress him.