Change you can Xerox
$Zero
that's Hillary summing up Obama's campaign.
the medium is the message.
-$Zero...
the medium is the message -- NY Times McCain article
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/ca9fd395707d51c2
Pies de Arcilla
> Change you can Xerox
>
> that's Hillary summing up Obama's campaign.
The google ad beside this post says "A shocking secret coffee co's
don't want you to know"
I gave up coffee, so I don't care.
I hope that McCain and Clinton both lose, because they are awful,
awful people. And I really don't want to know any more about Obama,
because if I did, I might find out why he's horrible too. I would like
to press fast forward and get the election over with.
Boggles The Brain
It is already over, Pie.
BTW, Obama's rhetoric has spawned a new product: "Hooked on Obamics"
coming soon to your WalMart so that your child can learn to orate
brilliantly and say absolutely nothing.
--Boggles the Brain
Thomas Armagost
>
> Change you can Xerox
>
> that's Hillary summing up Obama's campaign.
Speechwriting. It's writing, innit?
Ted Sorenson was JFK's speechwriter. He's currently backing Obama.
Cleverly done
"$Zero" <zero...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d50ed1c7-02da-402e...@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> Change you can Xerox
>
> that's Hillary summing up Obama's campaign.
>
> the medium is the message.
>
>
> -$Zero...
She pretty well nailed it. But American liberals love to hear that kind of
vacant rhetoric. As long as the words "Change, Hope, Children, and
Together" are mentioned in the same sound bite, it's a winner. Oh, and it
helps to mention "Health care". Just mention it, that's all. You can watch
liberals choke up and you can see them swallow hand as they listen to it.
Yep. They gobble it up allright. Like turds on a duck pond.
But the crap Hillary and McCain are throwing out is no better.
--Boggles
$Zero
> �"$Zero" <zeroi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> �>
> �> Change you can Xerox
> �>
> �> that's Hillary summing up Obama's campaign.
>
> Speechwriting. �It's writing, innit?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHkcyxIqpvk
> Ted Sorenson was JFK's speechwriter. �
words.
> He's currently backing Obama.
isn't everybody?
well, that's what the media claims, anyway.
so it must be true.
-$Zero...
Change you can Xerox
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/680868518b9f0f4d
Boggles The Brain
Here's a great line: If Obama gets the nomination the democrats will
finally be able to run someone who will make Jimmy Carter look
competent.
--Boggles
$Zero
> On Feb 22, 11:03 am, "$Zero" <zeroi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 22, 7:50�am, Thomas Armagost <si...@well.com> wrote:
>
> > > "$Zero" <zeroi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > Change you can Xerox
> > > >
> > > > that's Hillary summing up Obama's campaign.
>
> > > Speechwriting. It's writing, innit?
>
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHkcyxIqpvk
>
> > > Ted Sorenson was JFK's speechwriter.
>
> > words.
>
> > > He's currently backing Obama.
>
> > isn't everybody?
>
> > well, that's what the media claims, anyway.
>
> > so it must be true.
>
> > -$Zero...
>
> finally be able to run someone who will make Jimmy Carter look
> competent.
Obama has great potential.
he's a way better communicator than Hillary (let alone Carter).
he's even a better communicator than Ronald Raygun.
but if Hillary is actually taken out of the running, the media will
abandon him in two seconds flat. and the sheep will follow.
that gives the presidency to McCain's VP.
Towse
> On Feb 22, 12:49 pm, Boggles The Brain <royer...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Boggles the Clown AKA Gene Royer ... wrote some nonsense. ...
> Obama has great potential.
>
> he's a way better communicator than Hillary (let alone Carter).
>
> he's even a better communicator than Ronald Raygun.
>
> but if Hillary is actually taken out of the running, the media will
> abandon him in two seconds flat. and the sheep will follow.
>
> that gives the presidency to McCain's VP.
Many a slip 'twixt the cup and November. ...
--
Sal
Ye olde swarm of links: thousands of links for writers, researchers and
the terminally curious <http://writers.internet-resources.com>
Thomas Armagost
>
> Boggles The Brain wrote:
>
>> "$Zero" wrote:
>
>>> Thomas Armagost wrote:
>
>>>> "$Zero" wrote:
>
>>>>> Change you can Xerox
>
>>>>> that's Hillary summing up Obama's campaign.
>
>>>> Speechwriting. It's writing, innit?
>
>
>>> words.
>
>>>> He's currently backing Obama.
>
>>> isn't everybody?
>
>>> well, that's what the media claims, anyway.
>
>>> so it must be true.
>
>> democrats will finally be able to run someone who will
>> make Jimmy Carter look competent.
We've already got stagflation.
Would Obama make George W. Bush look competent?
> Obama has great potential.
>
> he's a way better communicator than Hillary (let alone
> Carter).
>
> he's even a better communicator than Ronald Raygun.
>
> but if Hillary is actually taken out of the running, the
> media will abandon him in two seconds flat. and the sheep
> will follow.
>
> that gives the presidency to McCain's VP.
President Huckabee.
Pies de Arcilla
> She pretty well nailed it. But American liberals love to hear that kind of
> vacant rhetoric. As long as the words "Change, Hope, Children, and
> Together" are mentioned in the same sound bite, it's a winner.
Jesus H. Christ on a Crutch. It's not like Republicans don't have
similar catch-words.
There's only one candidate who didn't vote for the war. Everything
else is noise.