Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Impressionism for Dummies.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

RJM

unread,
Apr 29, 2006, 5:07:12 PM4/29/06
to
Impressionism was the name given to a movement
started in the 19th century by a bunch of French
guys who saw the light. They began painting in fields
where the light they saw came from. Instead of
applying pure colour on the canvas and brushing
it into place guided by notes and memory in the
studio they preferred to be out in the light mixing
on the palette colours they saw. They began to
paint the moment. To paint the light and colour in
the light and colour. They did not spend a lot of
time reproducing exactly the scenes before them.
This was a period when technological advance
produced machines that captured light in a box
that was transformed into images by chemicals.
The "Impressionists" not only saw the light they
had a pretty good view of the future. They were
modern artists.

PJ

unread,
Apr 29, 2006, 5:16:45 PM4/29/06
to
"RJM" <scrat...@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:4AQ4g.5029$mH3....@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...

> Impressionism was the name given to a movement started in the 19th century
> by a bunch of French guys who saw the light.

And a few girls. Only a few. Berthe Morisot was actually given the coveted
privilege of displaying at the Salon alongside the highly superior male
artists ... of course I know you know that, probably much, much better than
I, but I love her paintings so much I needed to give her a wee plug.

> They began painting in fields where the light they saw came from. Instead
> of applying pure colour on the canvas and brushing it into place guided by
> notes and memory in the studio they preferred to be out in the light
> mixing on the palette colours they saw. They began to paint the moment. To
> paint the light and colour in the light and colour. They did not spend a
> lot of time reproducing exactly the scenes before them. This was a period
> when technological advance produced machines that captured light in a box
> that was transformed into images by chemicals. The "Impressionists" not
> only saw the light they had a pretty good view of the future. They were
> modern artists.

You're wonderful.

~ ~

PJ

http://pjs-place.blogspot.com


gekko

unread,
Apr 29, 2006, 5:20:01 PM4/29/06
to
Skip this part. It's only an attribution telling you that "RJM"
<scrat...@virgin.net> wrote in news:4AQ4g.5029$mH3.4784@newsfe4-
gui.ntli.net:

<whatever>

Do dottism, or whatever it's called, next. 'k?

--
gekko

What a strange combination of odors! It smells like a fish died and all
the other fish sent flowers. -- Niles on "Frasier"

gekko

unread,
Apr 29, 2006, 5:21:06 PM4/29/06
to
Skip this part. It's only an attribution telling you that "PJ"
<autho...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:RbWdnYgBKJW9Rc7Z...@comcast.com:


> You're wonderful.

Not 'til he talks about dottism.

PJ

unread,
Apr 29, 2006, 6:15:36 PM4/29/06
to
"gekko" <ge...@lutz.kicks-ass.org.INVALID> wrote in message
news:Xns97B491F81...@217.68.187.32...

> Skip this part. It's only an attribution telling you that "PJ"
> <autho...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:RbWdnYgBKJW9Rc7Z...@comcast.com:
>
>> You're wonderful.
>
> Not 'til he talks about dottism.

You can bet he will, and he will do it with his usual eloquence.

I don't think you got the name quite right, though. For some reason, I seem
to remember it started with a *P*.

PJism maybe? Something like that.

gekko

unread,
Apr 29, 2006, 6:37:46 PM4/29/06
to
Skip this part. It's only an attribution telling you that "PJ"
<autho...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:QeWdnbswoZpxeM7Z...@comcast.com:

Polkaism? Pixelism?

Steve Pritchard

unread,
Apr 30, 2006, 5:16:33 PM4/30/06
to
"RJM" <scrat...@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:4AQ4g.5029$mH3....@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...

Bloody BBC and their desire to educate...


Dr Zen

unread,
Apr 30, 2006, 7:25:41 PM4/30/06
to
GIGO, innit. "RJM" <scrat...@virgin.net> fed this in:

You got a small child to write that, or is it PJ's introduction?
--

Dr Zen

I do believe that amor vincit omnia
or at least that if you have the amor,
you have a fighting chance.
http://gollyg.blogspot.com

Dr Zen

unread,
Apr 30, 2006, 7:28:50 PM4/30/06
to
GIGO, innit. "PJ" <autho...@yahoo.com> fed this in:

Whoosh!

Dr Zen

unread,
Apr 30, 2006, 7:54:11 PM4/30/06
to
GIGO, innit. "Steve Pritchard" <Steve_P...@ntlworld.com> fed this
in:

That is the funniest thing Pritchard has ever written, in one sentence
funnier than Joanna's entire output.

RJM

unread,
May 1, 2006, 6:49:52 AM5/1/06
to

"Dr Zen" <longho...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5rha525rffb7ta00a...@4ax.com...

> GIGO, innit. "RJM" <scrat...@virgin.net> fed this in:
>
>>Impressionism was the name given to a movement
>>started in the 19th century by a bunch of French
>>guys who saw the light. They began painting in fields
>>where the light they saw came from. Instead of
>>applying pure colour on the canvas and brushing
>>it into place guided by notes and memory in the
>>studio they preferred to be out in the light mixing
>>on the palette colours they saw. They began to
>>paint the moment. To paint the light and colour in
>>the light and colour. They did not spend a lot of
>>time reproducing exactly the scenes before them.
>>This was a period when technological advance
>>produced machines that captured light in a box
>>that was transformed into images by chemicals.
>>The "Impressionists" not only saw the light they
>>had a pretty good view of the future. They were
>>modern artists.
>>
>>
>
> You got a small child to write that, or is it PJ's introduction?

Whoosh!

RJM

unread,
May 1, 2006, 6:49:53 AM5/1/06
to

"Steve Pritchard" <Steve_P...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:4bknpbF...@individual.net...
Whoosh!


RJM

unread,
May 1, 2006, 5:45:58 PM5/1/06
to

"Dr Zen" <longho...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8gja52l396qf67mlo...@4ax.com...

> GIGO, innit. "Steve Pritchard" <Steve_P...@ntlworld.com> fed this
> in:
>
>>"RJM" <scrat...@virgin.net> wrote in message
>>news:4AQ4g.5029$mH3....@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
>>> Impressionism was the name given to a movement
>>> started in the 19th century by a bunch of French
>>> guys who saw the light. They began painting in fields
>>> where the light they saw came from. Instead of
>>> applying pure colour on the canvas and brushing
>>> it into place guided by notes and memory in the
>>> studio they preferred to be out in the light mixing
>>> on the palette colours they saw. They began to
>>> paint the moment. To paint the light and colour in
>>> the light and colour. They did not spend a lot of
>>> time reproducing exactly the scenes before them.
>>> This was a period when technological advance
>>> produced machines that captured light in a box
>>> that was transformed into images by chemicals.
>>> The "Impressionists" not only saw the light they
>>> had a pretty good view of the future. They were
>>> modern artists.
>>
>>Bloody BBC and their desire to educate...
>>
>
> That is the funniest thing Pritchard has ever written, in one sentence
> funnier than Joanna's entire output.

Whoosh!


Frank Raymond Michaels

unread,
May 1, 2006, 9:53:35 PM5/1/06
to
"PJ" <autho...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:QeWdnbswoZpxeM7Z...@comcast.com:

It was called Punctilism, because not only were the artists painting with
little dots, but they were scrupulously on time for every affair.

This differs from earlier painters, who showed up while you were still in
the shower.

--
FRM

Sylvia

unread,
May 2, 2006, 1:38:19 AM5/2/06
to
Mr. Frank Raymond Michaels wrote:

<...>


> It was called Punctilism, because not only were the artists painting with
> little dots, but they were scrupulously on time for every affair.

> This differs from earlier painters, who showed up while you were still in
> the shower.

Hey, things could be worse... ya could get caught by a Neoclassical
painter while still in yer bath.

http://tinyurl.com/nlwux


--
Sylvia (Most people do not know that Jacques-Louis David changed his
named from Jacques-Norman Bates)

0 new messages