Forwarded messages
[ From: "Tom Wood" <tomw...@flash.net> <mw...@panix.com>
[ Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005
[
[ Great read, I like how you punctuate the action to
[ subtly imply camera angles. Also liked the moving train
[ party and the way she had to pry the info she needed
[ out of an uncooperative person. The blowjob though - Is
[ that something thrown in to titillate the readers? The
[ scenes where one reality broke through to another
[ sounded high-dollar in terms of effects, so it might be
[ a good thing that it became part of a franchise. Hard
[ to imagine that stuff in a low budget movie. They did a
[ similar effect in Pirates of the Caribbean and it
[ didn't look cheap to do.
[
[ TW
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ From: "nmstevens" <nmst...@msn.com> <mw...@panix.com>
[ Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005
[
[ Tom Wood wrote:
[ >
[ > Great read, I like how you punctuate the action to
[ > subtly imply camera angles. Also liked the moving train
[ > party and the way she had to pry the info she needed
[ > out of an uncooperative person. The blowjob though - Is
[ > that something thrown in to titillate the readers?
[
[ To be honest, given that I never thought that this was
[ going to be more than an R-rated movie, it never occured
[ to me that you'd actually *see* much of anything -- I
[ mean, much beyond the fact that this guy has a girl down
[ between his legs, which, considering that she's just
[ walked the length of a train full of people in pretty
[ much all imaginable states of undress engaged in pretty
[ much anything you could think of --doesn't strike me as
[ inherently "titillating."
[
[ I did it, really, for two reasons -- first, I thought it
[ would be kind of funny -- that is, this guy carries on
[ what amounts to a rather casual conversation with Amy,
[ during the entire course of which he's having sex with
[ somebody else -- and he hardly ever refers to it.
[
[ Second, while we refer on several occasions to the kinds
[ of stories that Amy has done in the past, to the kind of
[ stuff that she's gotten into -- and there's the reference
[ to her previous story -- "How to be a Crack Whore" -- we
[ don't really see anything -- we don't get to see her, in
[ essence, on her own turf.
[
[ This place, these people, this situation -- having a
[ casual conversation with some guy who's being given a
[ blow job -- getting information out of him -- that's the
[ world that she knows, the kind of people she deals with.
[
[ If it's just like meeting some guy in a club, only it's
[ happening on a train -- if it was sanitized in that way -
[ - then, as far as I'm concerned, it makes Joey into much
[ less interesting a character -- and it says much less
[ about Amy -- so she goes to a train where they have
[ something like a club and talks to a guy there. But you
[ add that edge of weird depravity -- and have everybody
[ treat it like normal -- and now it's saying something
[ about her -- about what has -- at least up until now --
[ constituted "normal" in the world in which she has
[ navigated. And this guy -- the guy who is casually being
[ given a blow job -- he's the guy who's telling her that
[ what she's doing now is too weird, too dangerous, too
[ abnormal -- that she should back off, move out of town,
[ change her name.
[
[ It makes it into a rather different kind of scene --
[ certainly a rather different scene than what ultimately
[ ended up in the finished movie.
[
[ > The scenes where one reality broke through to another
[ > sounded high-dollar in terms of effects, so it might be
[ > a good thing that it became part of a franchise. Hard
[ > to imagine that stuff in a low budget movie.
[
[ I think you may have mis-typed. It might be a good thing
[ that it did --or a good thing that it *didn't*? Those
[ elements of the story certainly didn't survive the
[ transformation to a 2 million dollar direct-to-video
[ Hellraiser sequel -- which is as about as low-budget as
[ you can get outside of the Charlie Band type world. All
[ of that stuff was cut --the Chinese kitchen was cut --
[ plus, of course, just to save a little time and money,
[ they also cut out all of the scares.
[
[ > They did a similar effect in Pirates of the Caribbean
[ > and it didn't look cheap to do.
[
[ Well, it was pretty pricey in PotC because the "alternate
[ reality" that broke through was one in which all of the
[ characters were replaced by skeletal duplicates that were
[ completely rendered by means of CGI. Indeed, that would
[ be rather expensive.
[
[ "Deader" as originally conceived was certainly not a high
[ budget movie, in Hollywood terms. It would have been,
[ depending on the level of the casting, something like a
[ fifteen or twenty million dollar movie.
[
[ That, unfortunately, was not destined to be its fate.
[
[ NMS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded messages
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org
The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.
++++++
In the eyes of my existence
> Oh man! Where could I read that screenplay? I've been waiting for a
> year.
http://www.horrorlair.com/scripts/DEADER.pdf
--
RonB
"There's a story there...somewhere"
------------------------------------------
Crosspost-free screenwriting newsgroup at:
misc.writing.screenplays.moderated
------------------------------------------