Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Class 345 - Elizabeth Line

4 views
Skip to first unread message

e27002 aurora

unread,
Jul 16, 2017, 7:19:17 AM7/16/17
to
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 04:55:39 +0100, Basil Jet <ba...@spamspamspam.com>
wrote:

>On 2017\07\14 18:45, Chris Date (CMPD) wrote:
>> Managed to get out of the Friday morning meeting earlier with 30 mins to spare to get to Stratford for the daily Elizabeth Line unit working.
>>
>> I arrived on the Central Line at 10:41, it pulled in cross-platform at 10:42. Perfect timing!
>>
>> Photos:
>>
>> https://twitter.com/cmpd_date/status/885811382662438913
>>
>> The nice driver(s) even let me take some photos in the cab at Shenfield:
>>
>> https://twitter.com/cmpd_date/status/885817575158009857
>>
>> Overall, I give the train a 8/10, the interior décor is a bit too dark (too much grey) and the seats are more akin to the rock-hard Overground 378s rather than the comparatively softer LUL S Stock but otherwise well done to all involved.
>>
>
>Thanks.
>
>The moquette is crap. The coats of arms of Greater London, City Of
>London, Essex, Berkshire and Buckinghamshire would have made more of a
>statement.

Doubt this sort of detail is possible on moquette. It would be great
to have the coats of arms somewhere on the trains. But, my preference
would be Middlesex as opposed to Great London.

Of greater concern is the longitudinal hard seating. Within my memory
commuters from Twyford had compartment stock and conveniences on
board. Progress NOT.

Anna Noyd-Dryver

unread,
Jul 17, 2017, 11:41:58 AM7/17/17
to
e27002 aurora <adrian...@sprintmail.com> wrote:

> Of greater concern is the longitudinal hard seating. Within my memory
> commuters from Twyford had compartment stock and conveniences on
> board. Progress NOT.
>
>

Within rather more recent memory, Twyford was served by noisy rattly smelly
and slow 1st Gen DMMUs, against which 345s will surely be an improvement.

Also, presumably Telford will still be served by some gWr electrostar
services?


Anna Noyd-Dryver

Jim Chisholm

unread,
Jul 17, 2017, 3:54:42 PM7/17/17
to
Given to slow rate of progress for the many 1st gen DMUs a toilet was
essential.
I think the poster was referring to the way some trains were 'flighted'
in that some Reading to PAD trains with Mk1 carriages stopped only at
Twyford and then ran non stop with the next from Reading stopping at
only Maidenhead.


Anna Noyd-Dryver

unread,
Jul 18, 2017, 12:55:40 AM7/18/17
to
Twyford, #obvs.

Damn autocucumber again!


Andy Hyde-Rover


Anna Noyd-Dryver

unread,
Jul 18, 2017, 12:55:40 AM7/18/17
to
Jim Chisholm <jim.ch...@ucs.nscam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 17/07/2017 16:38, Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote:
>> e27002 aurora <adrian...@sprintmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Of greater concern is the longitudinal hard seating. Within my memory
>>> commuters from Twyford had compartment stock and conveniences on
>>> board. Progress NOT.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Within rather more recent memory, Twyford was served by noisy rattly smelly
>> and slow 1st Gen DMMUs, against which 345s will surely be an improvement.
>>
>> Also, presumably Telford will still be served by some gWr electrostar
>> services?
>>

Meaning Twyford, obviously!

>>
> Given to slow rate of progress for the many 1st gen DMUs a toilet was
> essential.
> I think the poster was referring to the way some trains were 'flighted'
> in that some Reading to PAD trains with Mk1 carriages stopped only at
> Twyford and then ran non stop with the next from Reading stopping at
> only Maidenhead.
>

That still occurs, to a certain extent, particularly in the down direction
evening peak, but there are some up peak trains specifically to ease the
lot of Twyford/Maidenhead commuters.


Anna Noyd-Dryver



0 new messages