Oh Richard via MTT&R
Rocky Roads
you choose. Oh, but don't forget, you are not actually hired until after
orientation, if they decide on it.
But, that is not important. What is important is what will this NG do
without you for a few days.
A. Pain cries your name even when you are around. Bill will have no one to
Nag at and informant will probably go insane again.
Even though they might have trouble saying it, I'll say it for them. Good
Luck.
Richard
"Rocky Roads" <n...@spam.bot> wrote in message
news:car5ue$9...@library1.airnews.net...
No you do not know what company it is I am going with.
You can guess all you want but you've got about 50,000 to choose from.
I will say this much, they basically do regional work.
Mostly in the midwest and southern states.
It is not one of the super companies like werner, j b, schneider, conway, or
any of those.
I will say this, they are white with blue lettering.
Unlike most large companies where you have to take everything with you to
orientation, these guys will put you into a truck and at least route you by
the house so you can put your stuff in the truck without having to lug it
all to orientation.
So tell me wise guy, what's the first letter of the company you think I'm
going with?
And it ain't Roehl either.
Nor is it any company based in wisconsin.
Cainman
"Richard" <Anon...@127.001> wrote in message
news:casq6...@news3.newsguy.com...
>
> "Rocky Roads" <n...@spam.bot> wrote in message
> news:car5ue$9...@library1.airnews.net...
What a surprise, the Bullis groupie writes a post to Bullis.
> > Being that you are going away for orientation, I think I know what
company
> > you choose. Oh, but don't forget, you are not actually hired until
after
> > orientation, if they decide on it.
> >
> > But, that is not important. What is important is what will this NG do
> > without you for a few days.
> >
> > A. Pain cries your name even when you are around.
He's STILL calling me "A. Pain?" What a dumbass!
> Bill will have no one
> to
> > Nag at and informant will probably go insane again.
> >
> > Even though they might have trouble saying it, I'll say it for them.
Good
> > Luck.
> >
>
> No you do not know what company it is I am going with.
I bet I can guess it, st00pid.
> You can guess all you want but you've got about 50,000 to choose from.
How many in Wisconsin? How many near Plover?
> I will say this much, they basically do regional work.
> Mostly in the midwest and southern states.
> It is not one of the super companies like werner, j b, schneider, conway,
or
> any of those.
> I will say this, they are white with blue lettering.
> Unlike most large companies where you have to take everything with you to
> orientation, these guys will put you into a truck and at least route you
by
> the house so you can put your stuff in the truck without having to lug it
> all to orientation.
>
> So tell me wise guy, what's the first letter of the company you think I'm
> going with?
> And it ain't Roehl either.
> Nor is it any company based in wisconsin.
Finally blacklisted from the entire state, eh?
JSHAY911
I wonder what happened to his Tater Job.
He isnt yapping much about that.
Rocky Roads
"Richard" <Anon...@127.001> wrote in message
news:casq6...@news3.newsguy.com...
> You can guess all you want but you've got about 50,000 to choose from.
> I will say this much, they basically do regional work.
> Mostly in the midwest and southern states.
> It is not one of the super companies like werner, j b, schneider, conway,
or
> any of those.
> I will say this, they are white with blue lettering.
> Unlike most large companies where you have to take everything with you to
> orientation, these guys will put you into a truck and at least route you
by
> the house so you can put your stuff in the truck without having to lug it
> all to orientation.
>
> So tell me wise guy, what's the first letter of the company you think I'm
> going with?
> And it ain't Roehl either.
> Nor is it any company based in wisconsin.
I am not even going to guess, because if I get it right you will not tell me
anyway. ;-) What type of fool do you take me for a JSHAY? <dog laughing>
I am glad it is not Roehl, because that means you will probably be able to
go faster than 64 mph.
Richard
"Rocky Roads" <n...@spam.bot> wrote in message
You don't know jack shit about roehl then. If they are governed, it's got to
be closer to 70.
After all, wisconsin is a 65mph state, as you should know.
I don't drive much above 70mph anyway because with a full wagon, it's a PITA
to get stopped.
Rocky Roads
"Richard" <Anon...@137.001> wrote in message
news:catp5...@news3.newsguy.com...
> You don't know jack shit about roehl then. If they are governed, it's got
to
> be closer to 70.
> After all, wisconsin is a 65mph state, as you should know.
>
> I don't drive much above 70mph anyway because with a full wagon, it's a
PITA
> to get stopped.
Who doesn't know "jack shit?" I have been at the "Roehl" yard in
Marshfield, Wisconsin and they told me they were governed to 65 mph.
You can not go by the Speedometer, you have to use a stopwatch and time
miles to get an accurate reading. Then just take 3600/TimeInSecs to get
MPH.
BTW You are telling me a full wagon is a PITA to get stopped? You think I
do not know that? Did you turn into Dave R and think I don't drive for a
living?
http://ADifferentRockyRoads.home.att.net/061304.gif
informant
"Richard" <Anon...@127.001> wrote in message
news:casq6...@news3.newsguy.com...
>
Uh huh. Do you really think you stand a chance of making it through
orientation, Bullis?
> So tell me wise guy, what's the first letter of the company you think I'm
> going with?
> And it ain't Roehl either.
> Nor is it any company based in wisconsin.
Why don't you just blurt it out now and get it over with, St00pid? How many
days will you be gone at this "orientation"? I want to mark my calendar when
to expect you to start polluting this newsgroup again.
informant
"Richard" <Anon...@137.001> wrote in message
news:catp5...@news3.newsguy.com...
>
Agreed!!11
Joyce
Maybe everyone will be greatly relieved
Richard is gone......but you Rocky,,,aren't
you going to ?
How do you split a person in half to be
in two different places...at the same time.
Please go, we will enjoy the vacation.
have a great time........joyce
Joyce
It must be nice you have company, and
can talk to Richard, (yourself) you must
carry on many conversations with all your
personalities.....glad I'm not there.
Do you ever get confused and forget who
you are?
joyce
truckinsp
>>Unlike most large companies where you have to take everything with you to
>>orientation, these guys will put you into a truck and at least route you
by
>>the house so you can put your stuff in the truck without having to lug it
>>all to orientation.
More Bullishit......what you just stated is AGAINST FMCSA rules.....so they
aren't a major carrier...........because NO major carrier is going to do
that....
>
>So tell me wise guy, what's the first letter of the company you think I'm
>going with?
>And it ain't Roehl either.
>Nor is it any company based in wisconsin.
Who gives a ****.....you'll only have a job for 30 days with them....that is
IF you get past orientation......now YOU figure out why THAT is true......
Cainman
"Richard" <Anon...@137.001> wrote in message
news:catp5...@news3.newsguy.com...
>
Truck driver Bullis, incompetant boob on the road.
realitytrucker
Oh, no, Sweetie! Your IDOL thinks you're a dumbass too! I know you
are simply CRUSHED by this latest revelation. Wait a minute. If
Bullis thinks you're a dumbass...and all of the rest of us think
you're a dumbass...do you think...could it possibly be..that maybe,
just maybe you really ARE a DUMBASS??
realitytrucker
Ah, Joyce, we can only wish with all of our hearts that he will leave
but he won't, And neither will Richard. they enjoy seeing their
names on the monitor too much.
realitytrucker
> "Richard" <Anon...@137.001> wrote in message
> news:catp5...@news3.newsguy.com...
> > You don't know jack shit about roehl then. If they are governed, it's got
> to
> > be closer to 70.
> > After all, wisconsin is a 65mph state, as you should know.
> >
> > I don't drive much above 70mph anyway because with a full wagon, it's a
> PITA
> > to get stopped.
>
>
> Who doesn't know "jack shit?" I have been at the "Roehl" yard in
> Marshfield, Wisconsin and they told me they were governed to 65 mph.
Uh huh, so that makes you an expert, I guess.
>
> You can not go by the Speedometer, you have to use a stopwatch and time
> miles to get an accurate reading. Then just take 3600/TimeInSecs to get
> MPH.
Why would anyone go to that trouble. Oh yeah, I guess a
non-truckdriver such as yourself would.
>
> BTW You are telling me a full wagon is a PITA to get stopped? You think I
> do not know that? Did you turn into Dave R and think I don't drive for a
> living?
You don't! You're a liar and an ass.
Rocky Roads
realitytrucker wrote in message
<8a7d8469.04061...@posting.google.com>...
RT, I have passed enough "Roehl" trucks to know where they are governed. I
didn't really have to ask, but I did anyway.
You call me a "non-truckdriver." Well, I can only be a truck driver for a
max of 11 out of 21ź hours anyway, so, with my off duty time, over ˝ the
time I am not a truck driver. Duh.
Wow RT, that makes you as Dumb as Dumb R. I have news for you that might
break your heart. It doesn't take very many brains to be a truck driver.
Hmmm, Dumb and Dumb R. Are you two twins?
Now, remember to keep an eye on the message headers. I would hate to see
you waste all sorts of time again on a reply to someone that you do not even
know. And on top of that, to see you call them Sweetie. You are starting
to sound like a Lot Lizard. Did you take classes on that?
Rocky Roads
"Joyce" <JoyceI...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:4441-40D...@storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net...
Joyce,
If the Second, Third, Forth or Fifth Rocky makes it too hard for me to tell
us apart, I will just start making minor changes to my name.
realitytrucker
You would know about lot lizards, Sweetie...not me. Never frequented
one. But it seems like you
Rocky Roads
>one. But it seems like you
I know all I want to know about Lot Lizards from the CB radio.
When you used the word "sweetie" in your reply to some other Rocky Roads,
you were acting just like a Lot Lizard on the CB.
So, I hope you like your new title of "Realitytrucker the Lot Lizard."
Rocky Roads
Joyce wrote in message <4441-40D...@storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net>...
> Rocky,,,,
>
> How do you split a person in half to be
> in two different places...at the same time.
Oh Joyce,
Don't tell me you still can not figure out there are are other people, maybe
even Zčke again, posting as Rocky Roads.
In other words, even if I quit posting, the name Rocky might be used by
someone else again and again I have no control over that. Sorry.
Rocky Roads
realitytrucker wrote in message
<8a7d8469.0406...@posting.google.com>...
Pot Kettle Black? Is that why you keep posting?
Amy D
truckinsp wrote:
>>On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:08:46 -0500, "Richard" <Anon...@127.001>,wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Unlike most large companies where you have to take everything with you to
>>>orientation, these guys will put you into a truck and at least route you
>
> by
>
>>>the house so you can put your stuff in the truck without having to lug it
>>>all to orientation.
>
>
> More Bullishit......what you just stated is AGAINST FMCSA rules.....so they
> aren't a major carrier...........because NO major carrier is going to do
> that....
Ummmm, what are you saying here, Truckinsp? That companies don't route
you through the house after orientation to get your trucking gear?? How
is this against regs? Ron's worked for big, small, and in-between and
ALL send him straight home from orientation to load up the truck....
amy
truckinsp
>you through the house after orientation to get your trucking gear?? How
>is this against regs? Ron's worked for big, small, and in-between and
>ALL send him straight home from orientation to load up the truck....
>amy
Correct....AFTER orientation.....but they don't give you a truck to drive TO
orientation.....unless of course, they've already done the pre-employment
drug test and verified the CDL....but how many companies do that before the
orientation????
Amy D
truckinsp wrote:
Okay, from what was snipped and quoted I thought you said it was against
the regs for them to send you through the house after orientation. :)
My bad. :)
amy
realitytrucker
It's easy to tell, Joyce, if the post reads like some arrogant, lying,
little asshole wrote it...chances are VERY good its "the REAL Rocky".
Another way: the more he sounds like Bullis ...the better the chance
its him.
The Moores
"truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:fH6Bc.11546$Wr....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
owner/operator under load to come to orientation. How they are getting
around the pre-employment I don't know.
truckinsp
>I have seen one ad from a company that says that they will put an
>owner/operator under load to come to orientation. How they are getting
>around the pre-employment I don't know.
Scary thought.....putting a person in a truck with a load BEFORE you know if
he has a drug problem or if he is qualified.....
Humpty
> So, I hope you like your new title of "Realitytrucker the Lot Lizard."
>
You sir, are an idiot ... but not just an idiot, but a COMPLETE IDIOT !!!
*sigh*
Humpty
Humpty
tell
> us apart, I will just start making minor changes to my name.
>
!!!
Humpty
Humpty
>
Humpty
The Moores
I do remember it was one of the "major" carriers.
Amy D
I think I've seen an ad like that, too. I wonder, since they are
owner/operators and "self-emplyed" they can get around it somehow? Or
maybe they have to test negative at a local workman's comp doctor --
what are those called?
amy
truckinsp
>owner/operators and "self-emplyed" they can get around it somehow? Or
>maybe they have to test negative at a local workman's comp doctor --
>what are those called?
>amy
Occupational medicine clinics? DOT will accept drug tests from them only
if they have a DOT approved drug and alcohol testing lab....
If an O/O is leased to a company, then that company is responsible for
having him in their drug and alcohol program....
O/O's who work for themselves MUST be in a consortium or have their own drug
and alcohol program that meets DOT requirements....
But seriously, would YOU put a driver in YOUR truck if you knew nothing
about him?? That is why most companies want you to go through orientation
so they can have a look at you first....
I've seen ads like that too, but usually they have been pretty crappy
companies.....you know...those who are always getting fined.....they just
never seem to learn....
Amy D
truckinsp wrote:
Yeah, occupational medical clinics. :) Thanks. No, I don't think it is
a GOOD idea..figured they found a loophole somewhere -- I think it was a
"big company" I saw the ad for, too. I'll have to watch for it.
amy
topper
Umm.. Every company I've worked for did drug testing and CDL Verify
BEFORE orientation... why spend the time training someone they can't use.
Do truck inspectors get background checked before going into training?
--
"Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum." - Vegetius
The Email address attached to this post is NEVER checked. Reply in NG
truckinsp
>Umm.. Every company I've worked for did drug testing and CDL Verify
>BEFORE orientation... why spend the time training someone they can't use.
I'm really curious about that.......I can understand them sending you to a
lab for pre employment testing, but exactly HOW did they verify your CDL -
that takes a couple of weeks to do....did they come to you and give you a
road test before orientation???? Did they check with previous employers
before sending you to orientation??? Most of the companies I see use the
orientation time to look over a person and decide whether or not they want
to trust them with a truck......
Yes, I HAVE seen some companies just put a guy in a truck before doing the
paperwork, and I've usually fined those companies....or, sometimes, they
learned the hard way......we were sent to find a tractor that a driver
abandoned.....seems he got into a wreck about two states away and abandoned
the $35,000 load and then tried to make it home with the tractor.....when
talking to the company, they told me that "he was such a nice guy" that they
put him in the truck without checking his background....turns out he was
wanted for stealing from another company and was wanted on a parole
violation out of another state.....
>Do truck inspectors get background checked before going into training?
Yes, EXTENSIVE background, psychological, etc testing....the law enforcement
hiring process usually takes a year from the time you apply until you are
put on the job.......
topper
> Topper wrote:
>
>>Umm.. Every company I've worked for did drug testing and CDL Verify
>>BEFORE orientation... why spend the time training someone they can't use.
>
>
> I'm really curious about that.......I can understand them sending you to a
> lab for pre employment testing, but exactly HOW did they verify your CDL -
> that takes a couple of weeks to do....did they come to you and give you a
> road test before orientation???? Did they check with previous employers
> before sending you to orientation??? Most of the companies I see use the
> orientation time to look over a person and decide whether or not they want
> to trust them with a truck......
How they verify a CDL:
Well, in this instance... the trucking companies I have worked for
were in Montana, and North Dakota. They Fax the form into Bismarck or
Helena, and would have results in a few hours. I could see this taking a
while say in Arizona (Swift and Knight would slow the state agencies
down). Nebraska (Werner, Crete, CCC). But I have never worked for a
"Freshman" Trucking company so I don't know how they work.
Road Tests:
The companies I worked for in the past and currently *DO* work for
don't hire "Freshman" So the road test really is just a technicality for
legal reasons. *IF* the driver is fairly new... they stick him with a
trainer for about 6 months. But our comapny doesn't hire fresh from
school. it's too dangerous.
Previous Employers:
Yes, when I filled out the Application; the waivers for previous
employers were included with the app. I ddin't hear from them, until
they heard from my old employers... it took about 2 weeks.
Looking over a person:
Well the company should ALWAYS be looking over the person to decide
if they are WORTH keeping. I'm sure you know that companies have to get
a fresh MVR every year... I think it should be 4 months. 3 times a year,
Or even better ONCE a season... then they could see if a driver needs
more "winter driving" training, or "summer/tourist" AKA "putting up with
4 wheelers" training.
> Yes, I HAVE seen some companies just put a guy in a truck before doing the
> paperwork, and I've usually fined those companies....or, sometimes, they
> learned the hard way......we were sent to find a tractor that a driver
> abandoned.....seems he got into a wreck about two states away and abandoned
> the $35,000 load and then tried to make it home with the tractor.....when
> talking to the company, they told me that "he was such a nice guy" that they
> put him in the truck without checking his background....turns out he was
> wanted for stealing from another company and was wanted on a parole
> violation out of another state.....
Maybe that has happned with my company in the past, I don't know where
they learned their lesson, but they have. And with my company owning
less than 80 trucks, it's not hard for them to keep on top of things.
>>Do truck inspectors get background checked before going into training?
>
>
> Yes, EXTENSIVE background, psychological, etc testing....the law enforcement
> hiring process usually takes a year from the time you apply until you are
> put on the job.......
Well.. I KNEW that you go through extensive training... including
Psychological... You go through the same training as a cop even if the
ONLY thing you want to do is scalehouse work.
But since you brought it up... maybe psychological evaluation wouldn't
be a bad thing for drivers... could get a lot of wakko's off the road.
(and one name in particular comes to mind).
truckinsp
>Topper wrote:
>
>How they verify a CDL:
> Well, in this instance... the trucking companies I have worked for
>were in Montana, and North Dakota. They Fax the form into Bismarck or
>Helena, and would have results in a few hours. I could see this taking a
>while say in Arizona (Swift and Knight would slow the state agencies
>down). Nebraska (Werner, Crete, CCC). But I have never worked for a
>"Freshman" Trucking company so I don't know how they work.
Wow....takes a LOT longer than that down here....who says MT and ND are
behind the times????
>Road Tests:
> The companies I worked for in the past and currently *DO* work for
>don't hire "Freshman" So the road test really is just a technicality for
>legal reasons. *IF* the driver is fairly new... they stick him with a
>trainer for about 6 months. But our comapny doesn't hire fresh from
>school. it's too dangerous.
>Previous Employers:
> Yes, when I filled out the Application; the waivers for previous
>employers were included with the app. I ddin't hear from them, until
>they heard from my old employers... it took about 2 weeks.
I wish all companies did that......
>Looking over a person:
> Well the company should ALWAYS be looking over the person to decide
>if they are WORTH keeping. I'm sure you know that companies have to get
>a fresh MVR every year... I think it should be 4 months. 3 times a year,
>Or even better ONCE a season... then they could see if a driver needs
>more "winter driving" training, or "summer/tourist" AKA "putting up with
>4 wheelers" training.
>> Yes, I HAVE seen some companies just put a guy in a truck before doing
the
>> paperwork, and I've usually fined those companies....or, sometimes, they
>> learned the hard way......we were sent to find a tractor that a driver
>> abandoned.....seems he got into a wreck about two states away and
abandoned
>> the $35,000 load and then tried to make it home with the tractor.....when
>> talking to the company, they told me that "he was such a nice guy" that
they
>> put him in the truck without checking his background....turns out he was
>> wanted for stealing from another company and was wanted on a parole
>> violation out of another state.....
>Maybe that has happned with my company in the past, I don't know where
>they learned their lesson, but they have. And with my company owning
>less than 80 trucks, it's not hard for them to keep on top of things.
You sound like you've found one of those companies that we NEED on the
roads!!! They seem to be on top of their game......I sincerely hope their
customers realize that and don't sell them out for a few dollars.....
>>Do truck inspectors get background checked before going into training?
>
>
> Yes, EXTENSIVE background, psychological, etc testing....the law
enforcement
> hiring process usually takes a year from the time you apply until you are
> put on the job.......
>Well.. I KNEW that you go through extensive training... including
>Psychological... You go through the same training as a cop even if the
>ONLY thing you want to do is scalehouse work.
>But since you brought it up... maybe psychological evaluation wouldn't
>be a bad thing for drivers... could get a lot of wakko's off the road.
>(and one name in particular comes to mind).
LOLOLOL....can you IMAGINE the flurry of posts to this NG from drivers
complaining that the govt is picking on them again????
Zčke
"topper" <toppe...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:O6OdnZeXvPG...@bresnan.com...
>
> But since you brought it up... maybe psychological evaluation wouldn't
> be a bad thing for drivers... could get a lot of wakko's off the road.
> (and one name in particular comes to mind).
>
Just one name?
Oh, that's right, Bullis and Rookie are the same person!
Rocky Roads - Post #14
"Zčke" <ŘŘŘ@inchon.kr> wrote in message
news:10dh2lh...@corp.supernews.com...
SHIT Zčke, you say that like people do not know you were the last person on
this NG to post with the name "Rookie."
How do you like my post counter. It should make it harder for another Zčke
to morph into me. Also, if he does morph into me, it should make it easier
on me to identify the forged post.
BTW I know one wacko they got of the road. They made him a dispatcher.
ROTFLMAO
Rocky Roads
"Humpty" <hah...@yeahright.com> wrote in message
news:lygBc.18142$WX1....@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
My reasoning was simple. If he could ever call me queer, then I could call
him something equally far from the truth.
Admirable Rocky
"Joyce" <JoyceI...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:4441-40D...@storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net...
> Rocky,,,,
>
> It must be nice you have company, and
> can talk to Richard, (yourself) you must
> carry on many conversations with all your
> personalities.....glad I'm not there.
>
> Do you ever get confused and forget who
> you are?
>
> joyce
While this is not the "Sucker Bait" that I'm looking for that Tim ate before
he started his constant BS about my CDL it does show one thing.
The above post shows that Joyce has eaten the Sucker Bait that tscottme and
realitytrucker posted about me being Richard and now she is regurgitating
it.
In other words, it helps to show how "Sucker Bait" works but it is not the
"Sucker Bait" I hope to find. I'm still looking for that . . .
Admirable Rocky
Admirable Rocky
"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.04061...@posting.google.com...
Tim, that is total bullshit and a post of yours a day earlier proves it.
This post poves how easily you are trolled by someone from "fiberpipe.net"
posting with my name.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.trucking/msg/ed4b51f1eee2b705
Note how even in your post above you didn't mention anything about "message
headers." Could it be you still did not know how to read "message headers"
on June 19, 2004. I think so.
Admirable Rocky
Admirable Rocky
"richard" <I.don...@do.you> wrote in message
news:fc6ln3p9vd86n2c6i...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:35:52 -0600, "Admirable Rocky" <woo...@att.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
> >news:8a7d8469.04061...@posting.google.com...
> >> JoyceI...@webtv.net (Joyce) wrote in message
> >news:<4441-40D...@storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net>...
> >> > Rocky,,,,
> >> >
> >> > It must be nice you have company, and
> >> > can talk to Richard, (yourself) you must
> >> > carry on many conversations with all your
> >> > personalities.....glad I'm not there.
> >> >
> >> > Do you ever get confused and forget who
> >> > you are?
> >> >
> >> > joyce
> >>
> >> It's easy to tell, Joyce, if the post reads like some arrogant, lying,
> >> little asshole wrote it...chances are VERY good its "the REAL Rocky".
> >>
> >> Another way: the more he sounds like Bullis ...the better the chance
> >> its him.
>
> person.
> I don't own a damn PPC and don't want one. I sure as hell would never
> use the nick "wookiee". Let alone "rocky" or "rookie".
> Neither do I have an account with att.
FYI I chose the e-mail address wookiee because I got sick and tired of being
call a Rookie. OK?
Second, I have traced that "Richard is Rocky" "Sucker Bait" back to it's
source. What makes this "Sucker Bait" so funny is none of the post in
question had an IP address so there could be no ARP used! (FYI ARP =
Address Resolution Protocol) Here is post containing the Original "Rocky is
Richard" "Sucker Bait":
From: "Cityofnyny" <cityo...@aol.com>
Newsgroups: misc.transport.trucking
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: Thinking of changing my usnet "handle"
> >"Rookie with 676 weeks" <nos...@spoofedaddress.ca> wrote in message
> >news:vumhc3j...@corp.supernews.com...
> >> what do you'all think of my new name?
>
> you mean "richard with 676 weeks"
>
> "Richard" and "Rookie with 12 weeks" appear to have the same IP/node using
ARP.
>
>
> http://www.louiesbrooklynpizza.com/
The entire thread shows that we both disagreed with him but that did not
stop tscottme from using that "Rocky is Richard" "Sucker Bait" in February
2004.
A month after Scott me used that "Rocky is Richard" "Sucker Bait" Tim used
it. Three days after Tim used that "Rocky is Richard" "Sucker Bait" Zčke
started posting with my name and e-mail address and things have never been
the same since!
Admirable Rocky
Rocky or Rocky?
WOW another "blast from the past" RANT! Did you READ this thread
before you posted it Roger Pissypants?????
Keep these gems coming!!! MORE proof of what you've been up to!
God, Roger, you must REALLY HATE yourself to keep bringing me these
posts!!!!!!!!
Rocky or Rocky?
>
> FYI I chose the e-mail address wookiee because I got sick and tired of being
> call a Rookie. OK?
You like RTQ, pissypants, Coward better????
You actually CHOSE Wookiee?????? Like are you 12?????
>
Rocky or Rocky?
>
> > > Do you ever get confused and forget who
> > > you are?
>
> > > joyce
>
Apparently he does Joyce, ALL THE TIME!!!!!
>
> This post poves how easily you are trolled by someone from "fiberpipe.net"
> posting with my name.
WTF????? I don't use fiberpipe! And you are maligning MY name,
pissypants!!!
Rocky or Rocky?
>
> Note how even in your post above you didn't mention anything about "message
> headers." Could it be you still did not know how to read "message headers"
> on June 19, 2004. I think so.
>
Ohhhh, LOOKEY, LOOKEY, LOOKEY!!!! Guess Roger the Coward Pissypants,
can't read "message headers" either!!!!
Remember when you said this: "SHIT Zèke, you say that like people do
not know you were the last person on
this NG to post with the name "Rookie."
How do you like my post counter. It should make it harder for another
Zèke
to morph into me. Also, if he does morph into me, it should make it
easier
on me to identify the forged post. "
AWWWWWW, everybody's a "forger" but you!!! Well, hope that "post
counter" helps you figure out how many times YOU'VE forged!!!!!
How's that intimidation thing you got going there working?????
Sorry, I just don't feel intimidated yet?
But Roger, just how does it feel to start the new year so
scared?????? I know you are scared shitless (must make it easier on
the Depends, huh?) when you start with the bawling and the begging and
the "blasts from the past" and the "self-help" nymshifts.
Go ahead, try denying the nymshifts - maybe somebody will believe you,
just not anybody here!!!!
The Honorable Dr. Rocky Five
news:<catrot$s...@library1.airnews.net>...
>
> You're a liar and an ass.
YHBT Tim
Richard had no idea what a "belly strap" was in the first place and it was
your fault for believing him even after you called him a "liar" so many
times!
Too bad the posters bbelly, ~Tony~ and Skateboard'n didn't help me with the
definition of "belly strap" sooner. It could have stopped years of
senseless bullshit that you are still posting today!
Ok Tim, do I see the words "I give" from you yet?
The Honorable Dr. Rocky Five has posted