Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Future I-69 Texas 3 Branches Designations

11 views
Skip to first unread message

AlbertC79

unread,
Oct 9, 2002, 10:57:53 AM10/9/02
to
It is said that all 3 southern branches of I-69 in Texas will be built, but the
big issue is what to designate them. One idea the feds had in mind was to
designate the western stretch as I-69, the central stretch as I-69C and the
eastern stretch as I-69E, but this idea fell through due to AASHTO's decision
not to use letters for interstates.

Here's one idea for designating these 3 branches:

1. The main stretch of I-69 should take the central stretch into McAllen.
2. The western Stretch into Laredo should be I-169.
3. The Eastern stretch (US-77) should be I-269 till it gets to I-37, then that
stretch becomes an extension of I-37into Brownsville, and the remaining stretch
into Corpus Christi could be redesignated as an I-x37.

Here's another:

1. Same as above
2. Eastern and Western stretches into Laredo and Brownsvile signed as I-169 &
I-369 respectively.

Bobby Henderson

unread,
Oct 9, 2002, 11:41:18 AM10/9/02
to
AlbertC79 <albe...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20021009105753...@mb-cd.aol.com...

> It is said that all 3 southern branches of I-69 in Texas will be built,
but the
> big issue is what to designate them. One idea the feds had in mind was to
> designate the western stretch as I-69, the central stretch as I-69C and
the
> eastern stretch as I-69E, but this idea fell through due to AASHTO's
decision
> not to use letters for interstates.

I am skeptical about "I-69C" getting built any time in the near future. It
involves upgrading US-281 down to McAllen. The current road is a four lane
divided highway with at grade intersections. And that facility is likely
good enough for at least the next 10 to 20 years. I think the only thing
that really needs to be done along that stretch of US-281 is perhaps
securing extra right of way for future expansion and upgrading. Limited
access Interstate-standard bypasses can be made for towns like Alice,
Falfurrias and Encino.

As to what "I-69C" should be called, it can be named a 3di I-x69 route.
Another slim possibility would be if US-281 between San Antonio and Wichita
Falls were upgraded to Interstate status (an I-33 idea). If such a road
were built, that numerical ID could easily go all the way down to McAllen.

The I-69E route that is currently in the process of upgrading the US-77 four
lane to full Interstate status should be I-37. Yep. Turn the current
terminus of I-37 going into Corpus Christi a neat sounding 3di route (like
"I-737"). But have the actual 2di main route of I-37 go all the way down to
Brownsville.

I-69 itself is set to terminate near Laredo, merging into I-35.

There is also the added possibility of I-27 being extended down along the
Rio Grande River through Laredo and down into the
McAllen/Harlingen/Brownsville area. At least that is one of the ideas shown
in the Trans Texas Corridor plan.

Seems like a whole lot of highway planned for the far South end of Texas.
But that area is rapidly growing in population. Once Austin hits the 1
million level for residents living inside city limits, my pick is
Brownsville as what will be the fifth city in Texas to go into the
millionaires club.

Bobby Henderson


Erik Slotboom

unread,
Oct 9, 2002, 9:29:47 PM10/9/02
to
There's definitely no obvious answer on how to number the 3 planned branches
of I-69. The last time I talked to someone involved in the process (at least
18 months ago), he indicated that a numbering decision was well in the
future.

SFBayBoy

unread,
Oct 10, 2002, 1:51:04 AM10/10/02
to
> Seems like a whole lot of highway planned for the far South end of Texas.
> But that area is rapidly growing in population. Once Austin hits the 1
> million level for residents living inside city limits, my pick is
> Brownsville as what will be the fifth city in Texas to go into the
> millionaires club.

Brownsville? Granted South Texas is exploding with growth. However
with a current population of only 140,000, Brownsville has a very long
way to go hit the one million mark. El Paso on the other hand has
nearly 600,000 and Fort Worth is at 535,000. Both are growing rapidly
-- especially El Paso.

Michael G. Koerner

unread,
Oct 10, 2002, 2:56:06 AM10/10/02
to

El Paso sounds like a likely 'next million' city to me, too. In far
south Texas, I can actually see McAllen overtaking Brownsville, although
it will be a few censi before either approaches 1M population, even with
Texas' generous annexation laws.

--
___________________________________________ ____ _______________
Regards, | |\ ____
| | | | |\
Michael G. Koerner May they | | | | | | rise again!
Appleton, Wisconsin USA | | | | | |
___________________________________________ | | | | | | _______________

0 new messages