JoeTaxpayer <
JoeTa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>Background -
>I am working on my daughter's tax return. She is on her own, another
>state, in fact, but at 24, still on a family insurance plan with me.
>She has multiple jobs, 6, and as I look at the W2's she forwarded, I see
>a 1099-NEC instead for one place she worked. Looking at pub 1779, which
>is now 10 years old, has a description of Independent contractor vs
>employee, and there is nothing about the work that should have her as a
>1099 contractor. She is not comfortable discussing this with the
>company, so I'm moving forward.
I've filed Schedule C for myself in any number of tax years. There are
record-keeping requirements when I'm in business for myself. Other than
statutory employee/non-employee, in my opinion, making that bright-line
distinction has to take into account where the work is performed and if
the work is performed at the payor's site, then whether the payee brings
his own tools. If the payee works with the payor's tools at the payor's
job site, it's hard to argue that the payee isn't an employee. You're
probably right that it was mischaracterized.
At this point, if she's not taking the position that the income was
mischaracterized, then the onus is on her that she was a sole proprietor
for this period, and that comes with all the record-keeping requirements
of being in business for one's self.
On the other hand, if she takes the position that she was an employee,
then her take-home pay is net of withholding for FICA and HI (I assume
Additional Medicare Tax doesn't apply), in other words 100%-7.65%=92.35%
of gross wages, ignoring income tax withholding. If she takes the
position that she's an employee but her take-home pay was her gross
wages, in theory, she could owe 1/2 of the undeposited Social Security
taxes but they'd really come after the employer.
It's not a good position to be in. Let her learn a lesson that both
parties must agree to employee versus non-employee up front and that the
employer doesn't want the expense of payroll tax deposits DOES NOT make
her a non-employee. In order to be a non-employee, she truly has to be
in business for herself.
>I know this income will go on Schedule C (and she'll pay 2X FICA on this
>amount),
Don't forget that 1/2 of self-employment tax is an expense and the
Qualified Business Income Deduction.
>but the one real question I have now - How much of her health
>insurance cost can go as an expense (line 14) against this income? FWIW,
>the amount is about 25% of her total income for 2022.
If she's taking the position that she was self employed on the days she
was on that job, and employed on the days she was on the 5 other jobs,
then up to the pro-rated share of that number of days of the year. But
she'd better have business records showing this as I'm assuming she
didn't literally write you a check for her share of the family medical
insurance for this period.