Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
6 views
Skip to first unread message
Jack Kohnen
Aug 7, 2012, 12:37:46 AM8/7/12
to
http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-
hate-conservative-women/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-
ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
According to the Progressives, women cannot be �real women� if
they don�t fit the Progressives� script. Yep, if a woman doesn�t
march to the Left�s horse dung definition regarding what �they�
(whoever the heck �they� are) have determined constitutes a real
woman, she is illegitimate. Here�s 10 reasons why I believe the
dour democratic dames dislike Conservative women.
hate-conservative-women/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-
ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
According to the Progressives, women cannot be �real women� if
they don�t fit the Progressives� script. Yep, if a woman doesn�t
march to the Left�s horse dung definition regarding what �they�
(whoever the heck �they� are) have determined constitutes a real
woman, she is illegitimate. Here�s 10 reasons why I believe the
dour democratic dames dislike Conservative women.
John Doe
Aug 7, 2012, 1:57:57 AM8/7/12
to
The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary people
so that government is the tiebreaker in our relationships.
Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary people's
most personal relationships. It should stop playing the
tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight, since it
cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It should treat
people like grown-ups instead of treating women like favored
siblings.
So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the more
powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic violence, not
less. No different than disrespecting any powerful object.
"Jack Kohnen" <jkahnen yahoo.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!xmission!news.snarked.org!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!news.alt.net!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x5!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
> From: "Jack Kohnen" <jkahnen yahoo.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Message-ID: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 06:37:46 +0200
> Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse dizum.com
> Organization: mail2news dizum.com
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180062 rec.arts.tv:559873 misc.survivalism:303207 can.politics:284598
thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary people
so that government is the tiebreaker in our relationships.
Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary people's
most personal relationships. It should stop playing the
tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight, since it
cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It should treat
people like grown-ups instead of treating women like favored
siblings.
So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the more
powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic violence, not
less. No different than disrespecting any powerful object.
"Jack Kohnen" <jkahnen yahoo.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!xmission!news.snarked.org!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!news.alt.net!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news-x5!mail2news-x4!mail2news-x3!mail2news-x2!mail2news
> From: "Jack Kohnen" <jkahnen yahoo.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Message-ID: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 06:37:46 +0200
> Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse dizum.com
> Organization: mail2news dizum.com
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180062 rec.arts.tv:559873 misc.survivalism:303207 can.politics:284598
John Doe
Aug 7, 2012, 2:10:58 AM8/7/12
to
I wrote:
> ...there is no such thing as "conservative women"
To expand... There is no such thing as "conservative women
politicians" or "conservative women who believe in so-called equal
rights". Gender "equality" drives government expansion probably
more than anything else. And it's all government needs to destroy
our democracy. Democracy is great until its filthy hands reach
beyond the head of household.
> ...there is no such thing as "conservative women"
To expand... There is no such thing as "conservative women
politicians" or "conservative women who believe in so-called equal
rights". Gender "equality" drives government expansion probably
more than anything else. And it's all government needs to destroy
our democracy. Democracy is great until its filthy hands reach
beyond the head of household.
Ashley Johnson
Aug 7, 2012, 2:29:05 AM8/7/12
to
Normally, I'd stay out of this crap, but ...
On Aug 7, 5:57 am, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
> natural authority/BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzt
Ex-CUSE-me? What "natural authority" is that?
http://www.hks.harvard.edu/inequality/Seminar/Papers/Rosenbluth08.pdf
"Gender equality in human history takes on the shape of a giant U,
starting with relatively egalitarian hunter-gatherer societies in
which females were ..."
Seems like we are *naturally* the equals of men, since apparently we
were treated as equals or near-equals for all the time before the rise
of patriarchal societies started in the late Stone Age. Strongly male-
biased inequality is, apparently, *un*natural, an invention of the
Pharaohs and their ilk five thousand some-odd years ago.
On Aug 7, 5:57 am, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
Ex-CUSE-me? What "natural authority" is that?
http://www.hks.harvard.edu/inequality/Seminar/Papers/Rosenbluth08.pdf
"Gender equality in human history takes on the shape of a giant U,
starting with relatively egalitarian hunter-gatherer societies in
which females were ..."
Seems like we are *naturally* the equals of men, since apparently we
were treated as equals or near-equals for all the time before the rise
of patriarchal societies started in the late Stone Age. Strongly male-
biased inequality is, apparently, *un*natural, an invention of the
Pharaohs and their ilk five thousand some-odd years ago.
Gunner Asch
Aug 7, 2012, 3:22:06 AM8/7/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 06:37:46 +0200, "Jack Kohnen" <jka...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"And finally, how come the gay activists got their national dander up
over Chick-fil-A’s exec not being down with Brad and Chad getting
engaged, yet I haven’t heard them say diddly squat about their
intentions to stage a national “Kiss In” at any American mosque or give
the hundreds of black pastors who vehemently oppose gay marriage the
same crap they’ve been giving Chick-fil-A. What’s the matter? You’re not
scared to take them on, are you? You’re not chicken, are you?"
ROFLMAO!! Of course they are chicken. They picked on an 80+ yr old
couple and thought they could get away with it.
And that...is all they could do. Laugh laugh laugh!! If they had
picketed a mosque or a black church..they would have gotten their asses
handed to them. Damned shame they didnt have the cajones to do just
that. But for that crowd.."style over substance" every time. Pick on
the elderly..and stay far far away from those that would kick their
asses in a heartbeat.
Typical Leftwingers. All mouth...no ass.
Gunner
--
"I was eating breakfast with my 13-year-old granddaughter
and I asked her, "What day is the 20th of February?"
She said "It's President's Day!"
(She is a smart kid.)
I asked "What does President's Day mean?"
I was waiting for something about Washington or Lincoln .... etc.
She replied, "President's Day is when President Obama steps out
of the White House, and if he sees his shadow we have
one more year of unemployment."
You know, it hurts when hot coffee spurts out your nose..."
wrote:
over Chick-fil-A’s exec not being down with Brad and Chad getting
engaged, yet I haven’t heard them say diddly squat about their
intentions to stage a national “Kiss In” at any American mosque or give
the hundreds of black pastors who vehemently oppose gay marriage the
same crap they’ve been giving Chick-fil-A. What’s the matter? You’re not
scared to take them on, are you? You’re not chicken, are you?"
ROFLMAO!! Of course they are chicken. They picked on an 80+ yr old
couple and thought they could get away with it.
And that...is all they could do. Laugh laugh laugh!! If they had
picketed a mosque or a black church..they would have gotten their asses
handed to them. Damned shame they didnt have the cajones to do just
that. But for that crowd.."style over substance" every time. Pick on
the elderly..and stay far far away from those that would kick their
asses in a heartbeat.
Typical Leftwingers. All mouth...no ass.
Gunner
--
"I was eating breakfast with my 13-year-old granddaughter
and I asked her, "What day is the 20th of February?"
She said "It's President's Day!"
(She is a smart kid.)
I asked "What does President's Day mean?"
I was waiting for something about Washington or Lincoln .... etc.
She replied, "President's Day is when President Obama steps out
of the White House, and if he sees his shadow we have
one more year of unemployment."
You know, it hurts when hot coffee spurts out your nose..."
Ubiquitous
Aug 7, 2012, 4:11:54 AM8/7/12
to
jka...@yahoo.com wrote:
>http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-hate-conservative-women/
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
And you posted this off topic article jere necause?
--
"If Barack Obama isn't careful, he will become the Jimmy Carter of the
21st century."
>http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-hate-conservative-women/
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
>
>According to the Progressives, women cannot be �real women� if
>they don�t fit the Progressives� script. Yep, if a woman doesn�t
>march to the Left�s horse dung definition regarding what �they�
>(whoever the heck �they� are) have determined constitutes a real
>woman, she is illegitimate. Here�s 10 reasons why I believe the
>dour democratic dames dislike Conservative women.
Funny how the left claims to be so tolernt of other viewpoints, is it not?
>According to the Progressives, women cannot be �real women� if
>they don�t fit the Progressives� script. Yep, if a woman doesn�t
>march to the Left�s horse dung definition regarding what �they�
>(whoever the heck �they� are) have determined constitutes a real
>woman, she is illegitimate. Here�s 10 reasons why I believe the
>dour democratic dames dislike Conservative women.
And you posted this off topic article jere necause?
--
"If Barack Obama isn't careful, he will become the Jimmy Carter of the
21st century."
Ubiquitous
Aug 7, 2012, 6:10:15 AM8/7/12
to
jka...@yahoo.com wrote:
>http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-hate-conservative-women/
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
>
>According to the Progressives, women cannot be “real women” if
>they don’t fit the Progressives’ script. Yep, if a woman doesn’t
>march to the Left’s horse dung definition regarding what “they”
>(whoever the heck “they” are) have determined constitutes a real
>woman, she is illegitimate. Here’s 10 reasons why I believe the
>dour democratic dames dislike Conservative women.
not?
And you posted this off topic article here because?
Ubiquitous
Aug 7, 2012, 5:10:15 AM8/7/12
to
jka...@yahoo.com wrote:
>http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-hate-conservative-women/
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
>
>According to the Progressives, women cannot be “real women” if
>they don’t fit the Progressives’ script. Yep, if a woman doesn’t
>march to the Left’s horse dung definition regarding what “they”
>(whoever the heck “they” are) have determined constitutes a real
>woman, she is illegitimate. Here’s 10 reasons why I believe the
>dour democratic dames dislike Conservative women.
>they don’t fit the Progressives’ script. Yep, if a woman doesn’t
>march to the Left’s horse dung definition regarding what “they”
>(whoever the heck “they” are) have determined constitutes a real
>woman, she is illegitimate. Here’s 10 reasons why I believe the
>dour democratic dames dislike Conservative women.
BeamMeUpScotty
Aug 7, 2012, 10:33:41 AM8/7/12
to
their women drive or because they beat their women...?
Or do you support the Muslim Brotherhood because they KILL the gays
within their society?
--
*Rumination*
#14 - If more Government, solves all the problems, prison must be a
Socialists Utopia.... and a Club Med vacation for Liberals.
John Doe
Aug 7, 2012, 3:58:48 PM8/7/12
to
A flailing cannibal-left liberal troll...
BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestroyEverything blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-12.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <50212745.308 blackhole.nebulax.com>
> From: BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestroyEverything blackhole.nebulax.com>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <jvqbhh$ugk$1 dont-email.me>
> In-Reply-To: <jvqbhh$ugk$1 dont-email.me>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 28
> X-Complaints-To: abuse easynews.com
> Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
> X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:33:41 -0400
> X-Received-Bytes: 2039
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180098 rec.arts.tv:559971 misc.survivalism:303259 can.politics:284648
BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestroyEverything blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-12.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <50212745.308 blackhole.nebulax.com>
> From: BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestroyEverything blackhole.nebulax.com>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <jvqbhh$ugk$1 dont-email.me>
> In-Reply-To: <jvqbhh$ugk$1 dont-email.me>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 28
> X-Complaints-To: abuse easynews.com
> Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
> X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:33:41 -0400
> X-Received-Bytes: 2039
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180098 rec.arts.tv:559971 misc.survivalism:303259 can.politics:284648
John Doe
Aug 7, 2012, 4:25:39 PM8/7/12
to
Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com> wrote:
> John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
>> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
>> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary
>> people so that government is the tiebreaker in our
>> relationships.
>>
>> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary
>> people's most personal relationships. It should stop playing
>> the tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight,
>> since it cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It
>> should treat people like grown-ups instead of treating women
>> like favored siblings.
>>
capable, of course.
> Seems like we are *naturally* the equals of men, since
> apparently we were treated as equals or near-equals for all the
> time before the rise of patriarchal societies started in the
> late Stone Age.
Trying to rewrite prehistoric history is a good one.
> Strongly male- biased inequality is, apparently, *un*natural, an
> invention of the Pharaohs and their ilk five thousand some-odd
> years ago.
And the cow jumped over the moon.
The only reason ordinary women are "equal" these days is because
they have become useful idiots of the ruling class. Stuff is
falling apart around them, but like drug addicts, they just can't
wait for their next fix. If not for male police officers (with
billy club and gun) to do your dirty work (while you pretend that
your hands are clean), you wouldn't have unnatural rights.
She thinks that the current situation is unnatural, when in fact
the only reason she has special rights is because ever-expanding
government is making it that way.
I'm not all that concerned. I am more or less just letting her
know what's going to happen, so it won't be that much of a shock
to her or to women who come after her. She may feel free to shoot
up until the sad truth rears its ugly head.
--
>
>
See also Google Groups
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 19
> Message-ID: <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344320946 5387 127.0.0.1 (7 Aug 2012 06:29:06 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 06:29:06 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=171.25.193.21; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180082 rec.arts.tv:559899 misc.survivalism:303219 can.politics:284603
>
> John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
>> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
>> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary
>> people so that government is the tiebreaker in our
>> relationships.
>>
>> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary
>> people's most personal relationships. It should stop playing
>> the tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight,
>> since it cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It
>> should treat people like grown-ups instead of treating women
>> like favored siblings.
>>
>> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
>> natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the
>> more powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic
>> violence, not less. No different than disrespecting any
>> powerful object.
>> more powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic
>> violence, not less. No different than disrespecting any
>> powerful object.
> What "natural authority" is that?
The natural authority that comes from being physically more
capable, of course.
> Seems like we are *naturally* the equals of men, since
> apparently we were treated as equals or near-equals for all the
> time before the rise of patriarchal societies started in the
> late Stone Age.
> Strongly male- biased inequality is, apparently, *un*natural, an
> invention of the Pharaohs and their ilk five thousand some-odd
> years ago.
The only reason ordinary women are "equal" these days is because
they have become useful idiots of the ruling class. Stuff is
falling apart around them, but like drug addicts, they just can't
wait for their next fix. If not for male police officers (with
billy club and gun) to do your dirty work (while you pretend that
your hands are clean), you wouldn't have unnatural rights.
She thinks that the current situation is unnatural, when in fact
the only reason she has special rights is because ever-expanding
government is making it that way.
I'm not all that concerned. I am more or less just letting her
know what's going to happen, so it won't be that much of a shock
to her or to women who come after her. She may feel free to shoot
up until the sad truth rears its ugly head.
--
>
>
See also Google Groups
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 19
> Message-ID: <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 171.25.193.21
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344320946 5387 127.0.0.1 (7 Aug 2012 06:29:06 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 06:29:06 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=171.25.193.21; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180082 rec.arts.tv:559899 misc.survivalism:303219 can.politics:284603
>
Saladmander
Aug 7, 2012, 6:42:28 PM8/7/12
to
On 07 Aug 2012, John Doe <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> posted some
news:jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me:
Lefties do that whenever convenient.
>> Strongly male- biased inequality is, apparently, *un*natural, an
>> invention of the Pharaohs and their ilk five thousand some-odd
>> years ago.
>
> And the cow jumped over the moon.
>
> The only reason ordinary women are "equal" these days is because
> they have become useful idiots of the ruling class. Stuff is
> falling apart around them, but like drug addicts, they just can't
> wait for their next fix. If not for male police officers (with
> billy club and gun) to do your dirty work (while you pretend that
> your hands are clean), you wouldn't have unnatural rights.
>
> She thinks that the current situation is unnatural, when in fact
> the only reason she has special rights is because ever-expanding
> government is making it that way.
>
> I'm not all that concerned. I am more or less just letting her
> know what's going to happen, so it won't be that much of a shock
> to her or to women who come after her. She may feel free to shoot
> up until the sad truth rears its ugly head.
>
Wow. You could be describing Sarah Ehrett or Sandra Fluke. I believe
they are related.
news:jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me:
>> Strongly male- biased inequality is, apparently, *un*natural, an
>> invention of the Pharaohs and their ilk five thousand some-odd
>> years ago.
>
> And the cow jumped over the moon.
>
> The only reason ordinary women are "equal" these days is because
> they have become useful idiots of the ruling class. Stuff is
> falling apart around them, but like drug addicts, they just can't
> wait for their next fix. If not for male police officers (with
> billy club and gun) to do your dirty work (while you pretend that
> your hands are clean), you wouldn't have unnatural rights.
>
> She thinks that the current situation is unnatural, when in fact
> the only reason she has special rights is because ever-expanding
> government is making it that way.
>
> I'm not all that concerned. I am more or less just letting her
> know what's going to happen, so it won't be that much of a shock
> to her or to women who come after her. She may feel free to shoot
> up until the sad truth rears its ugly head.
>
they are related.
William December Starr
Aug 8, 2012, 12:38:45 AM8/8/12
to
In article <64a36b4e5b5636e3...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>,
-- wds
"Jack Kohnen" <jka...@yahoo.com> said:
> http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-
> hate-conservative-women/
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-
> ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
>
> According to the Progressives, women cannot be "real women" if
> they don't fit the Progressives' script.
No, you're just lying.
> http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-
> hate-conservative-women/
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-
> ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
>
> According to the Progressives, women cannot be "real women" if
> they don't fit the Progressives' script.
-- wds
William December Starr
Aug 8, 2012, 12:41:22 AM8/8/12
to
In article <jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>,
-- wds
John Doe <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> said:
> Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com> wrote:
>> John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
>>> natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the more
>>> powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic violence, not
>>> less. No different than disrespecting any powerful object.
>>
>> What "natural authority" is that?
>
> The natural authority that comes from being physically more
> capable, of course.
Wow. Just when you think Usenet can't _possibly_ get any dumber...
> Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com> wrote:
>> John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
>>> natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the more
>>> powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic violence, not
>>> less. No different than disrespecting any powerful object.
>>
>> What "natural authority" is that?
>
> The natural authority that comes from being physically more
> capable, of course.
-- wds
RichTravsky
Aug 8, 2012, 12:43:37 AM8/8/12
to
John Doe wrote:
>
> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary people
> so that government is the tiebreaker in our relationships.
What tie breaker?
>
> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary people
> so that government is the tiebreaker in our relationships.
> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary people's
> most personal relationships. It should stop playing the
> tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight, since it
> cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It should treat
> people like grown-ups instead of treating women like favored
> siblings.
>
> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
> natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the more
> powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic violence, not
> less. No different than disrespecting any powerful object.
by justifying beating up someone.
RichTravsky
Aug 8, 2012, 12:45:10 AM8/8/12
to
feels it's ok to beat women.
RichTravsky
Aug 8, 2012, 12:49:15 AM8/8/12
to
John Doe wrote:
>
> Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
> >> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
> >> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary
> >> people so that government is the tiebreaker in our
> >> relationships.
> >>
> >> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary
> >> people's most personal relationships. It should stop playing
> >> the tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight,
> >> since it cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It
> >> should treat people like grown-ups instead of treating women
> >> like favored siblings.
> >>
> >> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
> >> natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the
> >> more powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic
> >> violence, not less. No different than disrespecting any
> >> powerful object.
>
> > What "natural authority" is that?
>
> The natural authority that comes from being physically more
> capable, of course.
"Of course"? Says who?
>
> Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
> >> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
> >> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary
> >> people so that government is the tiebreaker in our
> >> relationships.
> >>
> >> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary
> >> people's most personal relationships. It should stop playing
> >> the tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight,
> >> since it cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It
> >> should treat people like grown-ups instead of treating women
> >> like favored siblings.
> >>
> >> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
> >> natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the
> >> more powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic
> >> violence, not less. No different than disrespecting any
> >> powerful object.
>
> > What "natural authority" is that?
>
> The natural authority that comes from being physically more
> capable, of course.
Try your crap out on someone like these ladies, you gutless coward:
http://do-while.com/img/life/female-bodybuilders/female-bodybuilders36.jpg
http://iheart7.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/female-bodybuilder.jpg
http://gallery.fitness.ee/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=38655&g2_serialNumber=2
> > Seems like we are *naturally* the equals of men, since
> > apparently we were treated as equals or near-equals for all the
> > time before the rise of patriarchal societies started in the
> > late Stone Age.
>
> Trying to rewrite prehistoric history is a good one.
> > Strongly male- biased inequality is, apparently, *un*natural, an
> > invention of the Pharaohs and their ilk five thousand some-odd
> > years ago.
>
> And the cow jumped over the moon.
>
> The only reason ordinary women are "equal" these days is because
> they have become useful idiots of the ruling class. Stuff is
Gunner Asch
Aug 8, 2012, 2:23:53 AM8/8/12
to
Gunner Asch
Aug 8, 2012, 2:24:35 AM8/8/12
to
On 8 Aug 2012 00:38:45 -0400, wds...@panix.com (William December Starr)
wrote:
>No, Im just lying.
>
>-- wds
Corrected for accuracy
wrote:
>
>-- wds
Corrected for accuracy
Gunner Asch
Aug 8, 2012, 2:25:16 AM8/8/12
to
Democrat.
John Doe
Aug 8, 2012, 3:57:53 AM8/8/12
to
A cannibal-left liberal chronic liar...
noarchive and/or nymshifting
changes the subject line, the follow-up groups, and the introductions
RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <5021EED6.17AD225B hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:45:10 -0600
> From: RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 24
> X-Received-Bytes: 1864
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180233 rec.arts.tv:560281 misc.survivalism:303428 can.politics:284864
noarchive and/or nymshifting
changes the subject line, the follow-up groups, and the introductions
RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <5021EED6.17AD225B hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:45:10 -0600
> From: RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 24
> X-Received-Bytes: 1864
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180233 rec.arts.tv:560281 misc.survivalism:303428 can.politics:284864
>
> Ashley Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Normally, I'd stay out of this crap, but ...
>>
> Ashley Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Normally, I'd stay out of this crap, but ...
>>
John Doe
Aug 8, 2012, 4:01:56 AM8/8/12
to
Travesty lives out its tough-guy-wannabe fantasy life here
protecting women from violence on the Internet...
noarchive and/or nymshifting
changes the subject line, the follow-up groups, and the introductions
RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!news2.euro.net!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <5021EFCB.EB6984C hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:49:15 -0600
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180235 rec.arts.tv:560283 misc.survivalism:303429 can.politics:284866
protecting women from violence on the Internet...
noarchive and/or nymshifting
changes the subject line, the follow-up groups, and the introductions
RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
> Message-ID: <5021EFCB.EB6984C hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:49:15 -0600
> From: RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Followup-To: alt.idiots
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 77
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180235 rec.arts.tv:560283 misc.survivalism:303429 can.politics:284866
John Doe
Aug 8, 2012, 4:13:46 AM8/8/12
to
Gunner Asch <gunnerasch gmail.com> wrote:
> RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
>> "John Doe" (someone posted that he has an arrest record for
>> domestic violence) feels it's ok to beat women.
Nope. Not true. And the cannibal-left liberal chronic liar
Travesty has seen no evidence that I've ever beat a woman.
> Oh..then he is a Democrat.
Nope. I just enjoy arguing the obvious, that order is necessary
at home as much as it is anyplace else in society. Show me a
government that can rule by peace and love, where everybody is
equal, and I'll accept the idea that order isn't necessary at home.
It boils down to whether you believe that families should run
themselves, or that families should be run by ever-expanding
government.
--
>
> Gunner
>
> --
> "I was eating breakfast with my 13-year-old granddaughter
> and I asked her, "What day is the 20th of February?"
>
> She said "It's President's Day!"
> (She is a smart kid.)
> I asked "What does President's Day mean?"
> I was waiting for something about Washington or Lincoln .... etc.
> She replied, "President's Day is when President Obama steps out
> of the White House, and if he sees his shadow we have
> one more year of unemployment."
> You know, it hurts when hot coffee spurts out your nose..."
>
>
>
>
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 01:24:13 -0500
> From: Gunner Asch <gunnerasch gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 23:23:53 -0700
> Reply-To: gunnerasch gmail.com
> Message-ID: <cf1428p7t500on8q12a924asqphoeotmen 4ax.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <5021EED6.17AD225B hotmail.com>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
> X-Trace: sv3-RM2ITk02Bnt4LYLsYKqaVRhd+okx0xDrLkQlJhMVIctEFskT8dY0iT+dB5BMHTeH3oDJxgcdSRDbd3v!xDprHFYcxPrkL0ZA+VDyj6WJEcLwbZ8bym0HKl4LkyZk7XYQTyTn8pvuBtuogHRy0xR8eOTH
> X-Complaints-To: abuse giganews.com
> X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
> X-Original-Bytes: 3002
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180249 rec.arts.tv:560300 misc.survivalism:303447 can.politics:284871
>
> RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
>> "John Doe" (someone posted that he has an arrest record for
>> domestic violence) feels it's ok to beat women.
Travesty has seen no evidence that I've ever beat a woman.
> Oh..then he is a Democrat.
at home as much as it is anyplace else in society. Show me a
government that can rule by peace and love, where everybody is
equal, and I'll accept the idea that order isn't necessary at home.
It boils down to whether you believe that families should run
themselves, or that families should be run by ever-expanding
government.
--
>
> Gunner
>
> --
> "I was eating breakfast with my 13-year-old granddaughter
> and I asked her, "What day is the 20th of February?"
>
> She said "It's President's Day!"
> (She is a smart kid.)
> I asked "What does President's Day mean?"
> I was waiting for something about Washington or Lincoln .... etc.
> She replied, "President's Day is when President Obama steps out
> of the White House, and if he sees his shadow we have
> one more year of unemployment."
> You know, it hurts when hot coffee spurts out your nose..."
>
>
>
>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 01:24:13 -0500
> From: Gunner Asch <gunnerasch gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 23:23:53 -0700
> Reply-To: gunnerasch gmail.com
> Message-ID: <cf1428p7t500on8q12a924asqphoeotmen 4ax.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <5021EED6.17AD225B hotmail.com>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 46
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
> X-Trace: sv3-RM2ITk02Bnt4LYLsYKqaVRhd+okx0xDrLkQlJhMVIctEFskT8dY0iT+dB5BMHTeH3oDJxgcdSRDbd3v!xDprHFYcxPrkL0ZA+VDyj6WJEcLwbZ8bym0HKl4LkyZk7XYQTyTn8pvuBtuogHRy0xR8eOTH
> X-Complaints-To: abuse giganews.com
> X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
> X-Original-Bytes: 3002
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180249 rec.arts.tv:560300 misc.survivalism:303447 can.politics:284871
>
John Doe
Aug 8, 2012, 4:29:09 AM8/8/12
to
> RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
>>John Doe wrote:
>>>
>>> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
>>> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
>>> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary
>>> people so that government is the tiebreaker in our
>>> relationships.
>>
>>What tie breaker?
>>
>>> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary
>>> people's most personal relationships. It should stop playing
>>> the tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight,
>>> since it cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It
>>> should treat people like grown-ups instead of treating women
>>> like favored siblings.
>>>
>>> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of
>>> his natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for
>>> the more
>>
>>What natural authority?
>>
>>> powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic violence,
>>> not less. No different than disrespecting any powerful object.
>>
>>You're another insecure right wing hack who needs to feel like a
>>MAN by justifying beating up someone.
>
> Oddly enough..the arrest records show his type is overwhelmingly
> Democrat.
Women are overwhelmingly Democrat. Ordinary men are overwhelmingly
>>John Doe wrote:
>>>
>>> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
>>> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
>>> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary
>>> people so that government is the tiebreaker in our
>>> relationships.
>>
>>What tie breaker?
>>
>>> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary
>>> people's most personal relationships. It should stop playing
>>> the tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight,
>>> since it cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It
>>> should treat people like grown-ups instead of treating women
>>> like favored siblings.
>>>
>>> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of
>>> his natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for
>>> the more
>>
>>What natural authority?
>>
>>> powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic violence,
>>> not less. No different than disrespecting any powerful object.
>>
>>You're another insecure right wing hack who needs to feel like a
>>MAN by justifying beating up someone.
>
> Oddly enough..the arrest records show his type is overwhelmingly
> Democrat.
discriminated against. Ordinary men are stuck between the ruling
class and ordinary women. Unfortunately, most ordinary men, aren't
smart enough to see that ever-expanding government sticking its
filthy hands into ordinary people's most personal relationships is
the root cause of our problems. But of course they don't want to
see it because you think it means less pussy for them.
I could expand on that... Ordinary men are stuck between the
ruling class, ordinary women, and their own hormones. It's quite a
predicament.
--
>
>
> --
> "I was eating breakfast with my 13-year-old granddaughter
> and I asked her, "What day is the 20th of February?"
>
> She said "It's President's Day!"
> (She is a smart kid.)
> I asked "What does President's Day mean?"
> I was waiting for something about Washington or Lincoln .... etc.
> She replied, "President's Day is when President Obama steps out
> of the White House, and if he sees his shadow we have
> one more year of unemployment."
> You know, it hurts when hot coffee spurts out your nose..."
>
>
>
>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 01:25:35 -0500
> From: Gunner Asch <gunnerasch gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 23:25:16 -0700
> Reply-To: gunnerasch gmail.com
> Message-ID: <gh1428leakunufqbmgsbf9li56dmndjglb 4ax.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <5021EE79.F4189B0D hotmail.com>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 48
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
> X-Trace: sv3-oAkWi7iNC19Y+6YxJxVFH6IVWhhQl5SeOvzeK0m+fL8KXswGYPYIGRRGNE4O74YQptCs//fpqLWY7RZ!PkVrGzrf8hXKk5GpBAxUENwL94YX3PRTTecVuOiZzGW5lhn+G9JgkTaS7pLXM51I8pLr6dRl
> X-Complaints-To: abuse giganews.com
> X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
> X-Original-Bytes: 3010
> X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
> X-Received-Bytes: 3151
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180251 rec.arts.tv:560302 misc.survivalism:303449 can.politics:284873
>
John Doe
Aug 8, 2012, 4:30:17 AM8/8/12
to
Travesty cannot argue like a grown-up...
noarchive and/or nymshifting
changes the subject line, the follow-up groups, and the introductions
RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.glorb.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <5021EE79.F4189B0D hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:43:37 -0600
> X-Received-Bytes: 1829
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180231 rec.arts.tv:560280 misc.survivalism:303427 can.politics:284863
noarchive and/or nymshifting
changes the subject line, the follow-up groups, and the introductions
RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
> Message-ID: <5021EE79.F4189B0D hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:43:37 -0600
> From: RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 26
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Received-Bytes: 1829
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180231 rec.arts.tv:560280 misc.survivalism:303427 can.politics:284863
John Doe
Aug 8, 2012, 4:38:42 AM8/8/12
to
wdstarr panix.com (William December Starr) wrote:
> John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> said:
>> Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com> wrote:
>>> John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of
>>>> his natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for
>>>> the more powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic
>>>> violence, not less. No different than disrespecting any
>>>> powerful object.
>>>
>>> What "natural authority" is that?
>>
>> The natural authority that comes from being physically more
>> capable, of course.
>
> Wow. Just when you think Usenet can't _possibly_ get any
> dumber...
Using the oldest and lamest insult known to mankind doesn't show
off one's intelligence.
I'd be happy to match my mental accomplishments with a random troll,
any day.
--
>
> -- wds
>
>
>
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!69.16.185.16.MISMATCH!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!panix!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
> From: wdstarr panix.com (William December Starr)
> Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
> Lines: 20
> Message-ID: <jvsqli$3c$1 panix2.panix.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com
> X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1344400883 17997 166.84.1.2 (8 Aug 2012 04:41:23 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: abuse panix.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 04:41:23 +0000 (UTC)
> In-reply-to: jdoe usenetlove.invalid
> X-Received-Bytes: 1617
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180229 rec.arts.tv:560279 misc.survivalism:303426 can.politics:284862
>
> John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> said:
>> Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com> wrote:
>>> John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of
>>>> his natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for
>>>> the more powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic
>>>> violence, not less. No different than disrespecting any
>>>> powerful object.
>>>
>>> What "natural authority" is that?
>>
>> The natural authority that comes from being physically more
>> capable, of course.
>
> Wow. Just when you think Usenet can't _possibly_ get any
> dumber...
off one's intelligence.
I'd be happy to match my mental accomplishments with a random troll,
any day.
--
>
> -- wds
>
>
>
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!69.16.185.16.MISMATCH!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!panix!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
> From: wdstarr panix.com (William December Starr)
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Date: 8 Aug 2012 00:41:22 -0400
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
> Lines: 20
> Message-ID: <jvsqli$3c$1 panix2.panix.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com
> X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1344400883 17997 166.84.1.2 (8 Aug 2012 04:41:23 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: abuse panix.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 04:41:23 +0000 (UTC)
> In-reply-to: jdoe usenetlove.invalid
> X-Received-Bytes: 1617
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180229 rec.arts.tv:560279 misc.survivalism:303426 can.politics:284862
>
§pamßustêr
Aug 8, 2012, 1:00:43 AM8/8/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:SSjvqiiq$vl2$1...@dont-email.me...
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:SSjvqiiq$vl2$1...@dont-email.me...
§pamßustêr
Aug 8, 2012, 1:00:45 AM8/8/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
news:qag128pfdha099fuu...@4ax.com...
§pamßustêr
Aug 8, 2012, 1:00:47 AM8/8/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"Ashley Johnson" <ajohns...@gmail.com> wrote in message
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
news:567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
§pamßustêr
Aug 8, 2012, 1:00:49 AM8/8/12
to
"BeamMeUpScotty" <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in
message news:502127...@blackhole.nebulax.com...
§pamßustêr
Aug 8, 2012, 1:00:52 AM8/8/12
to
"Jack Kohnen" <jka...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >
hate-conservative-women/
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watchkv=I-
> ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
hate-conservative-women/
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watchkv=I-
> ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
§pamßustêr
Aug 8, 2012, 1:00:50 AM8/8/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
news:jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me...
§pamßustêr
Aug 8, 2012, 1:00:54 AM8/8/12
to
§pamßustêr
Aug 8, 2012, 1:00:55 AM8/8/12
to
"John Doe" <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
news:jvrs1o$sgp$4...@dont-email.me...
§pamßustêr
Aug 8, 2012, 10:57:42 AM8/8/12
to
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"William December Starr" <wds...@panix.com> wrote in message
news:jvsqgl$356$1...@panix2.panix.com...
John Doe
Aug 8, 2012, 6:14:59 PM8/8/12
to
Reply authors are not responsible for directing follow-ups.
That's the original poster's responsibility.
Changing the follow-up groups while posting this useless nonsense
is ridiculous.
"§pamßustêr" <§pamßustêr news.ca> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe10.iad.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mail
> From: "õpamáustˆr" <õpamáustˆr news.ca>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,us.politics
> Lines: 12
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> Message-ID: <o4xUr.24000$z66.7043 newsfe10.iad>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.66.75.172
> X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse sjrb.ca
> X-Trace: newsfe10.iad 1344445844 70.66.75.172 (Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:10:44 UTC)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:10:44 UTC
> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:00:50 -0700
> X-Received-Bytes: 1193
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180309 rec.arts.tv:560448 misc.survivalism:303521 us.politics:68591
> news:jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me...
>
>
>
>
>
That's the original poster's responsibility.
Changing the follow-up groups while posting this useless nonsense
is ridiculous.
"§pamßustêr" <§pamßustêr news.ca> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe10.iad.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mail
> From: "õpamáustˆr" <õpamáustˆr news.ca>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,us.politics
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me>
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Distribution: usa
> Lines: 12
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> Message-ID: <o4xUr.24000$z66.7043 newsfe10.iad>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.66.75.172
> X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse sjrb.ca
> X-Trace: newsfe10.iad 1344445844 70.66.75.172 (Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:10:44 UTC)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:10:44 UTC
> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:00:50 -0700
> X-Received-Bytes: 1193
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180309 rec.arts.tv:560448 misc.survivalism:303521 us.politics:68591
>
>
>
> --
> SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
>
>
>
> "John Doe" <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
>
>
> --
> SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
>
>
>
> news:jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me...
>
>
>
>
>
�pam�ust�r
Aug 8, 2012, 11:03:25 AM8/8/12
to
"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bg1428pe6fs8c09pa...@4ax.com...
Path: not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 01:24:55 -0500
From: Gunner Asch aka Gunner Ass <gunne...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 23:24:35 -0700
Reply-To: gunne...@gmail.com
Message-ID: <bg1428pe6fs8c09pa...@4ax.com>
References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<jvsqgl$356$1...@panix2.panix.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 37
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace:
sv3-8XAVIEQIYbZrtEls2Z8vUu587QXONxCX6EhYDUGLMYxNO1audmrbjWF5TmeTG+sCyfAIzoBMBQAxim0!LcgWYLfSlVb/yTCjhtZ5mvtpfXSBcJ6tfb+BhIi8DaumvPtH0rxGLhSAjMX9UOvyXJzeprv5
Complaints-To: ab...@giganews.com << ===============
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2305
X-Received-Bytes: 2446
Xref: Hurricane alt.politics.usa.republican:1457938 rec.arts.tv:1784299
sac.politics:10597 misc.survivalism:1036043 can.politics:1414662
�pam�ust�r
Aug 8, 2012, 11:04:16 AM8/8/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"RichTravsky" <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
news:5021EFCB...@hotmail.com...
�pam�ust�r
Aug 8, 2012, 11:04:38 AM8/8/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"John Doe" <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
news:jvt82p$sqq$2...@dont-email.me...
�pam�ust�r
Aug 8, 2012, 11:05:27 AM8/8/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"William December Starr" <wds...@panix.com> wrote in message
news:jvsqli$3c$1...@panix2.panix.com...
Path: not-for-mail
From: wds...@panix.com (William December Starr)
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
Date: 8 Aug 2012 00:41:22 -0400
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <jvsqli$3c$1...@panix2.panix.com>
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 20
References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me>
<567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1344400883 17997 166.84.1.2 (8 Aug 2012 04:41:23
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: ab...@panix.com << ===============
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1344400883 17997 166.84.1.2 (8 Aug 2012 04:41:23
GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 04:41:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Received-Bytes: 1617
Xref: Hurricane alt.politics.usa.republican:1457916 rec.arts.tv:1784274
sac.politics:10580 misc.survivalism:1036021 can.politics:1414652
§pamßustêr
Aug 8, 2012, 6:26:09 PM8/8/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"John Doe" <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
news:jvuod2$uel$1...@dont-email.me...
Path: not-for-mail
From: John Doe <jd...@usenetlove.invalid>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 22:14:59 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <jvuod2$uel$1...@dont-email.me>
References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me> <o4xUr.24000$z66....@newsfe10.iad>
Injection-Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 22:14:59 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="f9c42e4cf331ef19eb80723ad9c84028";
logging-data="31189"; mail-complaints-to= ab...@eternal-september.org
<<=============
"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vrkC0Zxk33VGsVu0oq/dsJjIMQIHBxGs="
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
Cancel-Lock: sha1:E1jTt8AmMwxKI/CI+4GUTC0g5fE=
X-Received-Bytes: 2728
Xref: Hurricane alt.politics.usa.republican:1458081 rec.arts.tv:1784635
sac.politics:10642 misc.survivalism:1036145 can.politics:1414782
Ashley Johnson
Aug 9, 2012, 11:01:08 AM8/9/12
to
On Aug 7, 8:25 pm, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com> wrote:
> Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com> wrote:
> > John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> >> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
> >> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
> >> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary
> >> people so that government is the tiebreaker in our
> >> relationships.
>
> >> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
> >> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
> >> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary
> >> people so that government is the tiebreaker in our
> >> relationships.
>
> >> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary
> >> people's most personal relationships. It should stop playing
> >> the tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight,
> >> since it cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It
> >> should treat people like grown-ups instead of treating women
> >> like favored siblings.
>
> >> people's most personal relationships. It should stop playing
> >> the tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight,
> >> since it cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It
> >> should treat people like grown-ups instead of treating women
> >> like favored siblings.
>
> >> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
> >> natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the
> >> more powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic
> >> violence, not less. No different than disrespecting any
> >> powerful object.
> > What "natural authority" is that?
>
> The natural authority that comes from being physically more
> capable, of course.
Ah. Because all of those strong, fit women competing in the Olympics
> >> natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the
> >> more powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic
> >> violence, not less. No different than disrespecting any
> >> powerful object.
> > What "natural authority" is that?
>
> The natural authority that comes from being physically more
> capable, of course.
are really illusions, or men in disguise, or otherwise not physically
capable.
And why do you think that authority should flow from physical ability?
That's Medieval thinking at best. Leadership is a quality of the mind,
as is figuring out the best thing to do. So, logically, authority
should flow from *mental* ability, and in that area women and men are
emphatically equal.
Although particular men and particular women may not be. For example,
obviously I'm smarter than you.
> > Seems like we are *naturally* the equals of men, since
> > apparently we were treated as equals or near-equals for all the
> > time before the rise of patriarchal societies started in the
> > late Stone Age.
>
> Trying to rewrite prehistoric history is a good one.
scientific article. Ancient hunter-gatherers were fairly egalitarian
between the sexes. So it seems that sex equality, or near-equality at
least, comes naturally to humans and it is patriarchy that is
artificial.
> > Strongly male- biased inequality is, apparently, *un*natural, an
> > invention of the Pharaohs and their ilk five thousand some-odd
> > years ago.
>
> And the cow jumped over the moon.
> The only reason ordinary women are "equal" these days is because
> they have become useful idiots of the ruling class.
and look around. Several countries have female leaders. Britain and
Canada have had women as prime ministers. In the US, the 2008
Democratic primary had Hillary Clinton contending as a serious
candidate to become the Democratic presidential candidate. There are
tons of women in Congress and the Senate.
> Stuff is falling apart around them, but like drug addicts, they just
> can't wait for their next fix. If not for male police officers (with
> billy club and gun) to do your dirty work (while you pretend that
> your hands are clean), you wouldn't have unnatural rights.
Are you really delusional or stuck-in-a-cave enough not to have
> billy club and gun) to do your dirty work (while you pretend that
> your hands are clean), you wouldn't have unnatural rights.
noticed that there are female police officers these days, too?
> She thinks that the current situation is unnatural, when in fact
> the only reason she has special rights is because ever-expanding
> government is making it that way.
>
> I'm not all that concerned. I am more or less just letting her
> know what's going to happen, so it won't be that much of a shock
> to her or to women who come after her. She may feel free to shoot
> up until the sad truth rears its ugly head.
buddies planning to overthrow the republic? That and a few barrels of
ANFO will get you a nice, rent-free pad in Guantanamo Bay.
Ashley Johnson
Aug 9, 2012, 11:07:19 AM8/9/12
to
On Aug 8, 5:00 am, "§pamßustêr" <§pamßustêr...@news.ca> wrote:
> --
> SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
>
> "Ashley Johnson" <ajohnson44...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> --
> SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
>
>
> news:567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
I beg your pardon? Are you accusing me of spamming? I don't multipost,
and Google limits crossposts to five groups, so the maximum BI of any
of my posts must be barely above 2. It'd have to be ten times that to
qualify as usenet spam.
John Doe
Aug 9, 2012, 12:23:49 PM8/9/12
to
woman.
> And why do you think that authority should flow from physical
> ability?
ever-expanding government. That's how ordinary women's "rights"
are enforced. Without male police officers (with billy club and
gun) there would be no such thing as women's "rights".
> That's Medieval thinking at best.
> Leadership is a quality of the mind,
> as is figuring out the best thing to do. So, logically,
> authority should flow from *mental* ability, and in that area
> women and men are emphatically equal.
>
> Although particular men and particular women may not be. For
> example, obviously I'm smarter than you.
troll on the Internet, any day.
>> > Seems like we are *naturally* the equals of men, since
>> > apparently we were treated as equals or near-equals for all
>> > the time before the rise of patriarchal societies started in
>> > the late Stone Age.
>>
>> Trying to rewrite prehistoric history is a good one.
>
> Nobody's rewriting anything here except, perhaps, you. That was
> a scientific article. Ancient hunter-gatherers were fairly
> egalitarian between the sexes.
girl!
> So it seems that sex equality, or near-equality at least, comes
> naturally to humans and it is patriarchy that is artificial.
>
>> > Strongly male- biased inequality is, apparently, *un*natural,
>> > an invention of the Pharaohs and their ilk five thousand
>> > some-odd years ago.
>>
>> And the cow jumped over the moon.
>> The only reason ordinary women are "equal" these days is
>> because they have become useful idiots of the ruling class.
>
> Some women *are* "of the ruling class". Get your head out of
> your cave and look around.
I'm anything but a Neanderthal. I speak well enough for a stupid
>> because they have become useful idiots of the ruling class.
>
> Some women *are* "of the ruling class". Get your head out of
> your cave and look around.
computer to understand what I say and to write it down. In fact,
80% of what I do on a computer is via voice. In 20 years or so,
you might that advanced.
> Several countries have female leaders. Britain and Canada have
> had women as prime ministers. In the US, the 2008 Democratic
> primary had Hillary Clinton contending as a serious candidate to
> become the Democratic presidential candidate. There are tons of
> women in Congress and the Senate.
administration positions with women. An interview with her was on
C-SPAN not long ago. No doubt, someday we will have a woman
president. True believers in the Church of an Ever Expanding
Government will bow down to that miraculous sign, while 97% of our
top 1000 companies will still be run by men.
Ordinary women are useful idiots being used by the ruling class.
>> Stuff is falling apart around them, but like drug addicts, they
>> just can't wait for their next fix. If not for male police
>> officers (with billy club and gun) to do your dirty work (while
>> you pretend that your hands are clean), you wouldn't have
>> unnatural rights.
>
> Are you really delusional or stuck-in-a-cave enough
troll on the Internet, any day.
> not to have noticed that there are female police officers these
> days, too?
them, resulting in the death of themselves and others, in the name
of "political correctness".
>> She thinks that the current situation is unnatural, when in
>> fact the only reason she has special rights is because
>> ever-expanding government is making it that way.
>>
>> I'm not all that concerned. I am more or less just letting her
>> know what's going to happen, so it won't be that much of a
>> shock to her or to women who come after her. She may feel free
>> to shoot up until the sad truth rears its ugly head.
>
> Is that a threat of some sort?
probably because the ruling class wanted to keep their property in
the family. Then to pit ordinary men and women against each other
for cheap labor. That wasn't enough, so now they're employing
communist Chinese slave labor, with the approval of ordinary women
who want lower prices and couldn't care less about their fellow
countrymen or our manufacturing capability. Nowadays, gender
"equality" also helps keep ordinary people subjugated. It's
classic "divide and conquer". The ruling class promote sex warfare
in order to win the class warfare. And it's working. Ordinary
women are ruling class useful idiots. They don't see (or care)
that everything is falling apart around them, all that matters is
their next "rights" fix. Democrats care about ordinary women like
a drug dealer cares about its users.
Democracy is great until its filthy hands reach beyond the head of
household. Our founders had no idea that ordinary women were going
to be used to destroy common families. Otherwise they would have
prevented that by providing something like a separation between
family and state, similar to the federalism difference between
state and federal government.
> A threat of what?
Is reality that scary to a cannibal-left liberal?
> You and your fundie buddies planning to overthrow the republic?
chaste, and who possessed such artistic talents as made them
ornaments of a masculine world. As mothers and housekeepers they
were domestic workhorses, but as sexual objects they must be
delicate and beautiful, living works of art existing in an
imaginative world of romantic love. (McLaughlin, 1988, p. 195).
I will be happy to match my patriotism with a cannibal-left
liberal, any day.
--
> That and a few barrels of ANFO will get you a nice, rent-free
> pad in Guantanamo Bay.
>
>
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 90
> Message-ID: <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.23.117.228
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344524574 16294 127.0.0.1 (9 Aug 2012 15:02:54 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=94.23.117.228; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
> X-Received-Bytes: 5529
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180435 rec.arts.tv:560913 misc.survivalism:303650 can.politics:285061
>
§pamßustêr
Aug 9, 2012, 9:49:15 AM8/9/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"John Doe" <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
news:k00o6l$cil$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
§pamßustêr
Aug 9, 2012, 9:49:36 AM8/9/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"Ashley Johnson" <ajohns...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed...@k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
David Johnston
Aug 10, 2012, 1:41:51 AM8/10/12
to
On 8/6/2012 11:57 PM, John Doe wrote:
> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary people
> so that government is the tiebreaker in our relationships.
>
> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary people's
> most personal relationships. It should stop playing the
> tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight, since it
> cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It should treat
> people like grown-ups instead of treating women like favored
> siblings.
>
> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
> natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the more
> powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic violence, not
> less. No different than disrespecting any powerful object.
I find your claim that legalizing wifebeating would make it less common
> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary people
> so that government is the tiebreaker in our relationships.
>
> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary people's
> most personal relationships. It should stop playing the
> tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight, since it
> cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It should treat
> people like grown-ups instead of treating women like favored
> siblings.
>
> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
> natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the more
> powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic violence, not
> less. No different than disrespecting any powerful object.
to be implausible.
John Doe
Aug 10, 2012, 1:54:47 AM8/10/12
to
nym-shifting troll...
David Johnston <davidjohnston29 block.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: David Johnston <davidjohnston29 block.com>
> Message-ID: <k026ub$gan$1 dont-email.me>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Injection-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:41:32 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="75b1b04ad74a296e7f7946f5b2d9f341"; logging-data="16727"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18U3I/HQN4SETHRZjf6AA81TMWwu9sZ364="
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
> In-Reply-To: <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me>
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:CnYZY/4jLEoErV6D3Ze/mVQ34dM=
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180513 rec.arts.tv:561415 misc.survivalism:303737 can.politics:285191
David Johnston <davidjohnston29 block.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: David Johnston <davidjohnston29 block.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:41:51 -0600
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 21
> Message-ID: <k026ub$gan$1 dont-email.me>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Injection-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:41:32 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="75b1b04ad74a296e7f7946f5b2d9f341"; logging-data="16727"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18U3I/HQN4SETHRZjf6AA81TMWwu9sZ364="
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
> In-Reply-To: <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me>
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:CnYZY/4jLEoErV6D3Ze/mVQ34dM=
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180513 rec.arts.tv:561415 misc.survivalism:303737 can.politics:285191
RichTravsky
Aug 11, 2012, 1:56:51 AM8/11/12
to
Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:45:10 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Ashley Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >> Normally, I'd stay out of this crap, but ...
> >>
> >> Ex-CUSE-me? What "natural authority" is that?
> >>
> >> http://www.hks.harvard.edu/inequality/Seminar/Papers/Rosenbluth08.pdf
> >>
> >> "Gender equality in human history takes on the shape of a giant U,
> >> starting with relatively egalitarian hunter-gatherer societies in
> >> which females were ..."
> >feels it's ok to beat women.
>
> Oh..then he is a Democrat.
No, a republicon. They think women are second class citizens.
>
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:45:10 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Ashley Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >> Normally, I'd stay out of this crap, but ...
> >>
> >> On Aug 7, 5:57 am, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> >> > So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
> >> > natural authority/BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzt
> >> On Aug 7, 5:57 am, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> >> > So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
> >>
> >> Ex-CUSE-me? What "natural authority" is that?
> >>
> >> http://www.hks.harvard.edu/inequality/Seminar/Papers/Rosenbluth08.pdf
> >>
> >> "Gender equality in human history takes on the shape of a giant U,
> >> starting with relatively egalitarian hunter-gatherer societies in
> >> which females were ..."
> >>
> >> Seems like we are *naturally* the equals of men, since apparently we
> >> were treated as equals or near-equals for all the time before the rise
> >> of patriarchal societies started in the late Stone Age. Strongly male-
> >> Seems like we are *naturally* the equals of men, since apparently we
> >> were treated as equals or near-equals for all the time before the rise
> >> biased inequality is, apparently, *un*natural, an invention of the
> >> Pharaohs and their ilk five thousand some-odd years ago.
> >
> >"John Doe" (someone posted that he has an arrest record for domestic violence)
> >> Pharaohs and their ilk five thousand some-odd years ago.
> >
> >feels it's ok to beat women.
>
> Oh..then he is a Democrat.
No, a republicon. They think women are second class citizens.
RichTravsky
Aug 11, 2012, 1:57:05 AM8/11/12
to
Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> On 8 Aug 2012 00:38:45 -0400, wds...@panix.com (William December Starr)
> >> hate-conservative-women/
> >>
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-
> >> ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
> >
> >-- wds
>
> Corrected for accuracy
>
> Gunner
Forger.
>
> On 8 Aug 2012 00:38:45 -0400, wds...@panix.com (William December Starr)
> wrote:
>
> >In article <64a36b4e5b5636e3...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>,
> >"Jack Kohnen" <jka...@yahoo.com> said:
> >
> >> http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-
>
> >In article <64a36b4e5b5636e3...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>,
> >"Jack Kohnen" <jka...@yahoo.com> said:
> >
> >> hate-conservative-women/
> >>
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-
> >> ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
> >>
> >> According to the Progressives, women cannot be "real women" if
> >> they don't fit the Progressives' script.
> >
> >No, Im just lying.
> >> According to the Progressives, women cannot be "real women" if
> >> they don't fit the Progressives' script.
> >
> >
> >-- wds
>
> Corrected for accuracy
>
> Gunner
Forger.
RichTravsky
Aug 11, 2012, 1:57:20 AM8/11/12
to
Gunner Asch wrote:
> >by justifying beating up someone.
>
> Oddly enough..the arrest records show his type is overwhelmingly
> Democrat.
Cite ->
>
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:43:37 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >John Doe wrote:
> >>
> >> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
> >> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
> >> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary people
> >> so that government is the tiebreaker in our relationships.
> >
> >What tie breaker?
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:43:37 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >John Doe wrote:
> >>
> >> The "nasty feminists" are a red herring. And there is no such
> >> thing as "conservative women". The real threat is equality
> >> destroying families by forcing "equality" between ordinary people
> >> so that government is the tiebreaker in our relationships.
> >
> >
> >> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary people's
> >> most personal relationships. It should stop playing the
> >> tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight, since it
> >> cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It should treat
> >> people like grown-ups instead of treating women like favored
> >> siblings.
> >>
> >> Government should just keep its filthy hands of ordinary people's
> >> most personal relationships. It should stop playing the
> >> tiebreaker. It should stop deciding who started a fight, since it
> >> cannot do so without invading everybody's privacy. It should treat
> >> people like grown-ups instead of treating women like favored
> >> siblings.
> >>
> >> So-called equality is the real threat. Stripping the man of his
> >> natural authority strips him of respect. No respect for the more
> >
> >What natural authority?
> >
> >
> >> powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic violence, not
> >> less. No different than disrespecting any powerful object.
> >
> >You're another insecure right wing hack who needs to feel like a MAN
> >> powerful partner naturally leads to more domestic violence, not
> >> less. No different than disrespecting any powerful object.
> >
> >by justifying beating up someone.
>
> Oddly enough..the arrest records show his type is overwhelmingly
> Democrat.
Cite ->
George Lincoln Rockwell
Aug 11, 2012, 2:28:41 AM8/11/12
to
"Jack Kohnen" <jkah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-
> hate-conservative-women/
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-
> ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
>
> According to the Progressives, women cannot be real women if
> they don t fit the Progressives script. Yep, if a woman doesn t
> http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-
> hate-conservative-women/
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-
> ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
>
> According to the Progressives, women cannot be real women if
> march to the Left s horse dung definition regarding what they
> (whoever the heck they are) have determined constitutes a real
> woman, she is illegitimate. Here s 10 reasons why I believe the
> dour democratic dames dislike Conservative women.
Rush says that women who use birth control are sluts, and I like Rush.
That's why Obamabula has a war on wimmin.
George Lincoln Rockwell
Aug 11, 2012, 2:31:33 AM8/11/12
to
degrees these days.
It's time to burn down the universities. Ann Coulter says that
wimmin shouldn't have the rite to vote.
I say thats tru, but add negros.
I dont like people wo are educaded. they hate rush.
RichTravsky
Aug 11, 2012, 2:34:11 AM8/11/12
to
And, it follows, if a bigger man than another man wants to demonstrate
their "authority" on that other man, that must be ok with him too.
RichTravsky
Aug 11, 2012, 2:34:57 AM8/11/12
to
about.... spamming.
RT
RichTravsky
Aug 11, 2012, 2:35:42 AM8/11/12
to
> > And why do you think that authority should flow from physical
> > ability?
>
> Because that's the way it flows from cannibal-left liberal
> ever-expanding government. That's how ordinary women's "rights"
> are enforced. Without male police officers (with billy club and
> gun) there would be no such thing as women's "rights".
RichTravsky
Aug 11, 2012, 2:36:22 AM8/11/12
to
John Doe
Aug 11, 2012, 5:32:19 AM8/11/12
to
As usual, the cannibal-left liberal Travesty is full of it.
I'm talking about in the privacy of ordinary people's homes. I'm
talking about a head of household having the authority to keep
order in his own home. I'm talking about preventing ever-expanding
government from invading the privacy of people who have agreed to
live together and who obviously don't want to separate.
True believers in the Church of an Ever Expanding Government say
that only a police officer (with billy club and gun) should use
force against others. I say that the more physically capable
spouse should have police authority, to use reasonable force to
keep order in his own home. Liberals like Travesty want
ever-expanding government to control every part of our personal
lives.
RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <5025FCE3.91329333 hotmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:34:11 -0600
> From: RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> X-Received-Bytes: 2708
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180601 rec.arts.tv:561958 misc.survivalism:303844 can.politics:285374
>
> Ashley Johnson wrote:
I'm talking about in the privacy of ordinary people's homes. I'm
talking about a head of household having the authority to keep
order in his own home. I'm talking about preventing ever-expanding
government from invading the privacy of people who have agreed to
live together and who obviously don't want to separate.
True believers in the Church of an Ever Expanding Government say
that only a police officer (with billy club and gun) should use
force against others. I say that the more physically capable
spouse should have police authority, to use reasonable force to
keep order in his own home. Liberals like Travesty want
ever-expanding government to control every part of our personal
lives.
RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <5025FCE3.91329333 hotmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:34:11 -0600
> From: RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 38
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Received-Bytes: 2708
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180601 rec.arts.tv:561958 misc.survivalism:303844 can.politics:285374
>
> Ashley Johnson wrote:
John Doe
Aug 11, 2012, 5:46:30 AM8/11/12
to
Another episode of Travesty living out its tough-guy-wannabe
fantasy life on the Internet...
RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.bbs-scene.org!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <5025FD3E.C1B69F09 hotmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:35:42 -0600
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180603 rec.arts.tv:561960 misc.survivalism:303846 can.politics:285375
fantasy life on the Internet...
RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.bbs-scene.org!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <5025FD3E.C1B69F09 hotmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:35:42 -0600
> From: RichTravsky <traRvEskyMOVE hotmail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me>
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 49
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180603 rec.arts.tv:561960 misc.survivalism:303846 can.politics:285375
§pamßµstèr
Aug 11, 2012, 2:52:20 PM8/11/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"RichTravsky" <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5025FD66...@hotmail.com...
Path: not-for-mail
Message-ID: <5025FD66...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:36:22 -0600
From: RichTravsky <traRvE...@hotmail.com>
Organization: Banzai Institute
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price!
www.newshosting.com
X-Complaints-To: ab...@newshosting.com << ===============
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price!
www.newshosting.com
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me> <k026ub$gan$1...@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Received-Bytes: 1929
Xref: Hurricane alt.politics.usa.republican:1458374 rec.arts.tv:1786730
sac.politics:10971 misc.survivalism:1036996 can.politics:1415259
§pamßµstèr
Aug 11, 2012, 2:53:20 PM8/11/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"John Doe" <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
news:k058r3$gjg$1...@dont-email.me...
Path: not-for-mail
From: John Doe <jd...@usenetlove.invalid>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:32:19 +0000 (UTC)
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <k058r3$gjg$1...@dont-email.me>
References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me>
<567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>
<f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed...@k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me>
<567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>
<5025FCE3...@hotmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:32:19 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="9578344d06fb783b067e1aae74cc1b11";
logging-data="17008"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org
<< ===========
"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/RZlUm6tkl05IBFQyhIIbt5cXnxbCvC7E="
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5r2JrsdOQGVJGP/9geda5ElQBWM=
X-Received-Bytes: 5170
Xref: Hurricane alt.politics.usa.republican:1458381 rec.arts.tv:1786742
sac.politics:10978 misc.survivalism:1037008 can.politics:1415274
Nadegda
Aug 11, 2012, 7:07:41 PM8/11/12
to
Some kook made some wild accusations about Ashley Johnson in
alt.usenet.kooks and I checked a bit of her posting history to
investigate the claim. Naturally, it proved to be a kooky one, and the
kook will probably be facing an award ceremony in his future for his
kookiness.
But, in the meantime, I notice the following post.
So the fuck what?
>> And why do you think that authority should flow from physical ability?
>
> Because that's the way it flows from cannibal-left liberal
> ever-expanding government.
Are you on crack?
> That's how ordinary women's "rights" are enforced.
And how were they enforced thirty thousand years ago, when, from what I
can recall reading, societies were pretty egalitarian but there were no
"cannibal-left liberal ever-expanding governments"?
> Without male police officers (with billy club and gun) there
> would be no such thing as women's "rights".
Don't be ridiculous. There are plenty of capable female police officers
outside of backwards shitholes like the muslim countries.
>> That's Medieval thinking at best.
>
> As opposed to denial of reality.
Sounds like you're a patriarchal, condescending, misogynistic male
chauvinist pig in denial of the reality that you're a dinosaur from last
century to me, to be precise.
>> Leadership is a quality of the mind,
>
> Leadership requires enforcement, at the point of a gun.
The only enforcement needed is the general prohibition against theft,
violence, and a few varieties of irresponsible and negligent behavior.
And men and women can equally participate in that endeavor, thanks in
part to the force-equalizer that is the gun. Which *you* mentioned.
>> as is figuring out the best thing to do. So, logically, authority
>> should flow from *mental* ability, and in that area women and men are
>> emphatically equal.
>>
>> Although particular men and particular women may not be. For example,
>> obviously I'm smarter than you.
>
> I'll be happy to compare my mental achievements with some random troll
> on the Internet, any day.
Why would you want to compare your mental achievements with yourself?
It's not like you'll win. It'll be a tie every time.
>> Nobody's rewriting anything here except, perhaps, you. That was a
>> scientific article. Ancient hunter-gatherers were fairly egalitarian
>> between the sexes.
>
> Prehistoric women... Baby in one hand, rock in the other. You go girl!
Children in such societies were reared by the whole tribe, fuckwit.
>>> The only reason ordinary women are "equal" these days is because they
>>> have become useful idiots of the ruling class.
>>
>> Some women *are* "of the ruling class". Get your head out of your cave
>> and look around.
>
> I'm anything but a Neanderthal.
Indeed; from all indications Neanderthals had far better attitudes
towards women than you do. You're far beneath Neanderthals. You're pond
scum.
> I speak well enough for a stupid computer to understand what I say and
> to write it down.
So does Koko the gorilla.
> In fact, 80% of what I do on a computer is via voice. In 20 years or
> so, you might that advanced.
Utterly irrelevant to the topic, unless you're now also claiming that
women all have speech impediments compared to men.
>> Several countries have female leaders. Britain and Canada have had
>> women as prime ministers. In the US, the 2008 Democratic primary had
>> Hillary Clinton contending as a serious candidate to become the
>> Democratic presidential candidate. There are tons of women in Congress
>> and the Senate.
>
> In 1973, Richard Nixon appointed a woman to fill high-level
> administration positions with women. An interview with her was on C-SPAN
> not long ago. No doubt, someday we will have a woman president. True
> believers in the Church of an Ever Expanding Government will bow down to
> that miraculous sign, while 97% of our top 1000 companies will still be
> run by men.
Companies like Sara Lee, WellPoint, Liz Claiborne Inc., Linamar, Xerox,
Kraft Foods, Rite Aid, Lucent, and Pepsico?
Oh, wait ...
> Ordinary women are useful idiots being used by the ruling class.
Hey, fuckhead.
Yeah, you, fuckhead.
N zvfbtlafgvp shpxjvg gung xabjf irel yvggyr nobhg gur hfrarg zrqvhz fnlf
jung?
> I'll be happy to compare my mental achievements with some random troll
> on the Internet, any day.
As I already explained, it will be a tie.
>> not to have noticed that there are female police officers these days,
>> too?
>
> Female police officers tend to have their guns taken away from them,
> resulting in the death of themselves and others, in the name of
> "political correctness".
[citation needed]
>>> She thinks that the current situation is unnatural, when in fact the
>>> only reason she has special rights is because ever-expanding
>>> government is making it that way.
>>>
>>> I'm not all that concerned. I am more or less just letting her know
>>> what's going to happen, so it won't be that much of a shock to her or
>>> to women who come after her. She may feel free to shoot up until the
>>> sad truth rears its ugly head.
>>
>> Is that a threat of some sort?
>
> Women's "rights" are a fabrication of the ruling class. Originally
> probably because the ruling class wanted to keep their property in the
> family. Then to pit ordinary men and women against each other for cheap
> labor. That wasn't enough, so now they're employing communist Chinese
> slave labor, with the approval of ordinary women who want lower prices
> and couldn't care less about their fellow countrymen or our
> manufacturing capability. Nowadays, gender "equality" also helps keep
> ordinary people subjugated. It's classic "divide and conquer". The
> ruling class promote sex warfare in order to win the class warfare. And
> it's working. Ordinary women are ruling class useful idiots. They don't
> see (or care) that everything is falling apart around them, all that
> matters is their next "rights" fix. Democrats care about ordinary women
> like a drug dealer cares about its users.
[citation needed] for every point in the above kooky conspiracy theory.
> Democracy is great until its filthy hands reach beyond the head of
> household.
What's that, an attempted defense of wifebeating and spousal rape?
Fuck you.
> Our founders had no idea that ordinary women were going to be
> used to destroy common families.
[citation needed]
> Otherwise they would have prevented that by providing something like a
> separation between family and state, similar to the federalism
> difference between state and federal government.
And there go most of the civil rights protections, even the protections
against slavery enacted after the Civil War. Way to go, fuckhead! You
just set the Republic's hard-won civil rights back about a century and a
half!
>> A threat of what?
>
> Is reality that scary to a cannibal-left liberal?
I am pretty sure she's questioning whether your kooky little "movement"
even has the guts to do anything but blather on usenet; so, whether it
even is "reality" that this alleged overthrow is going to happen.
>> You and your fundie buddies planning to overthrow the republic?
>
> Thomas Jefferson admired women who were soft, passive, modest, and
> chaste, and who possessed such artistic talents as made them ornaments
> of a masculine world.
Then Thomas Jefferson can go fuck himself for all I care. It's amazing
how, because someone got something right that predecessors kept getting
wrong, people will assume he's infallible in every respect. Thomas
Jefferson, for all that he achieved, was a flawed, fairly ordinary human
being and a product of his times. He has since been surpassed, as he
himself had surpassed previous world leaders that had even poorer
conceptions of how a country should be run.
> As mothers and housekeepers they were domestic workhorses, but as
> sexual objects they must be delicate and beautiful, living works of art
> existing in an imaginative world of romantic love.
We're people, dickwad. Not "workhorses" and certainly not "objects" or
"ornaments". "People" like you that want to treat large swathes of the
population as domesticated beasts of burden, at best, give the whole
species a bad name.
> (McLaughlin, 1988, p. 195).
>
> I will be happy to match my patriotism with a cannibal-left liberal, any
> day.
Patriotism?? Patriotism?!?!?! What patriotism? You disagree with many of
the key civil rights advances since the 1860s and would see women reduced
to chattels, essentially enslaved. In a free republic, that is not
patriotism, it is treachery! The only countries your attitude is
"patriotic" in are those backwards Muslim states that you've probably
cheered on the bombing of. (Now *there*'s some cognitive dissonance for
you!)
Now go crawl back under your rock, worm.
alt.usenet.kooks and I checked a bit of her posting history to
investigate the claim. Naturally, it proved to be a kooky one, and the
kook will probably be facing an award ceremony in his future for his
kookiness.
But, in the meantime, I notice the following post.
>> And why do you think that authority should flow from physical ability?
>
> Because that's the way it flows from cannibal-left liberal
> ever-expanding government.
> That's how ordinary women's "rights" are enforced.
can recall reading, societies were pretty egalitarian but there were no
"cannibal-left liberal ever-expanding governments"?
> Without male police officers (with billy club and gun) there
> would be no such thing as women's "rights".
outside of backwards shitholes like the muslim countries.
>> That's Medieval thinking at best.
>
> As opposed to denial of reality.
chauvinist pig in denial of the reality that you're a dinosaur from last
century to me, to be precise.
>> Leadership is a quality of the mind,
>
> Leadership requires enforcement, at the point of a gun.
violence, and a few varieties of irresponsible and negligent behavior.
And men and women can equally participate in that endeavor, thanks in
part to the force-equalizer that is the gun. Which *you* mentioned.
>> as is figuring out the best thing to do. So, logically, authority
>> should flow from *mental* ability, and in that area women and men are
>> emphatically equal.
>>
>> Although particular men and particular women may not be. For example,
>> obviously I'm smarter than you.
>
> I'll be happy to compare my mental achievements with some random troll
> on the Internet, any day.
It's not like you'll win. It'll be a tie every time.
>> Nobody's rewriting anything here except, perhaps, you. That was a
>> scientific article. Ancient hunter-gatherers were fairly egalitarian
>> between the sexes.
>
> Prehistoric women... Baby in one hand, rock in the other. You go girl!
>>> The only reason ordinary women are "equal" these days is because they
>>> have become useful idiots of the ruling class.
>>
>> Some women *are* "of the ruling class". Get your head out of your cave
>> and look around.
>
> I'm anything but a Neanderthal.
towards women than you do. You're far beneath Neanderthals. You're pond
scum.
> I speak well enough for a stupid computer to understand what I say and
> to write it down.
> In fact, 80% of what I do on a computer is via voice. In 20 years or
> so, you might that advanced.
women all have speech impediments compared to men.
>> Several countries have female leaders. Britain and Canada have had
>> women as prime ministers. In the US, the 2008 Democratic primary had
>> Hillary Clinton contending as a serious candidate to become the
>> Democratic presidential candidate. There are tons of women in Congress
>> and the Senate.
>
> In 1973, Richard Nixon appointed a woman to fill high-level
> administration positions with women. An interview with her was on C-SPAN
> not long ago. No doubt, someday we will have a woman president. True
> believers in the Church of an Ever Expanding Government will bow down to
> that miraculous sign, while 97% of our top 1000 companies will still be
> run by men.
Kraft Foods, Rite Aid, Lucent, and Pepsico?
Oh, wait ...
> Ordinary women are useful idiots being used by the ruling class.
Yeah, you, fuckhead.
N zvfbtlafgvp shpxjvg gung xabjf irel yvggyr nobhg gur hfrarg zrqvhz fnlf
jung?
> I'll be happy to compare my mental achievements with some random troll
> on the Internet, any day.
>> not to have noticed that there are female police officers these days,
>> too?
>
> Female police officers tend to have their guns taken away from them,
> resulting in the death of themselves and others, in the name of
> "political correctness".
>>> She thinks that the current situation is unnatural, when in fact the
>>> only reason she has special rights is because ever-expanding
>>> government is making it that way.
>>>
>>> I'm not all that concerned. I am more or less just letting her know
>>> what's going to happen, so it won't be that much of a shock to her or
>>> to women who come after her. She may feel free to shoot up until the
>>> sad truth rears its ugly head.
>>
>> Is that a threat of some sort?
>
> Women's "rights" are a fabrication of the ruling class. Originally
> probably because the ruling class wanted to keep their property in the
> family. Then to pit ordinary men and women against each other for cheap
> labor. That wasn't enough, so now they're employing communist Chinese
> slave labor, with the approval of ordinary women who want lower prices
> and couldn't care less about their fellow countrymen or our
> manufacturing capability. Nowadays, gender "equality" also helps keep
> ordinary people subjugated. It's classic "divide and conquer". The
> ruling class promote sex warfare in order to win the class warfare. And
> it's working. Ordinary women are ruling class useful idiots. They don't
> see (or care) that everything is falling apart around them, all that
> matters is their next "rights" fix. Democrats care about ordinary women
> like a drug dealer cares about its users.
> Democracy is great until its filthy hands reach beyond the head of
> household.
Fuck you.
> Our founders had no idea that ordinary women were going to be
> used to destroy common families.
> Otherwise they would have prevented that by providing something like a
> separation between family and state, similar to the federalism
> difference between state and federal government.
against slavery enacted after the Civil War. Way to go, fuckhead! You
just set the Republic's hard-won civil rights back about a century and a
half!
>> A threat of what?
>
> Is reality that scary to a cannibal-left liberal?
even has the guts to do anything but blather on usenet; so, whether it
even is "reality" that this alleged overthrow is going to happen.
>> You and your fundie buddies planning to overthrow the republic?
>
> Thomas Jefferson admired women who were soft, passive, modest, and
> chaste, and who possessed such artistic talents as made them ornaments
> of a masculine world.
how, because someone got something right that predecessors kept getting
wrong, people will assume he's infallible in every respect. Thomas
Jefferson, for all that he achieved, was a flawed, fairly ordinary human
being and a product of his times. He has since been surpassed, as he
himself had surpassed previous world leaders that had even poorer
conceptions of how a country should be run.
> As mothers and housekeepers they were domestic workhorses, but as
> sexual objects they must be delicate and beautiful, living works of art
> existing in an imaginative world of romantic love.
"ornaments". "People" like you that want to treat large swathes of the
population as domesticated beasts of burden, at best, give the whole
species a bad name.
> (McLaughlin, 1988, p. 195).
>
> I will be happy to match my patriotism with a cannibal-left liberal, any
> day.
the key civil rights advances since the 1860s and would see women reduced
to chattels, essentially enslaved. In a free republic, that is not
patriotism, it is treachery! The only countries your attitude is
"patriotic" in are those backwards Muslim states that you've probably
cheered on the bombing of. (Now *there*'s some cognitive dissonance for
you!)
Now go crawl back under your rock, worm.
Nadegda
Aug 11, 2012, 7:10:46 PM8/11/12
to
Some kook made some wild accusations about Ashley Johnson in
alt.usenet.kooks and I checked a bit of her posting history to
investigate the claim. Naturally, it proved to be a kooky one, and the
kook will probably be facing an award ceremony in his future for his
kookiness.
But, in the meantime, I notice the following post.
alt.usenet.kooks and I checked a bit of her posting history to
investigate the claim. Naturally, it proved to be a kooky one, and the
kook will probably be facing an award ceremony in his future for his
kookiness.
But, in the meantime, I notice the following post.
>> And why do you think that authority should flow from physical ability?
>
> Because that's the way it flows from cannibal-left liberal
> ever-expanding government.
> That's how ordinary women's "rights" are enforced.
And how were they enforced thirty thousand years ago, when, from what I
can recall reading, societies were pretty egalitarian but there were no
"cannibal-left liberal ever-expanding governments"?
can recall reading, societies were pretty egalitarian but there were no
"cannibal-left liberal ever-expanding governments"?
> Without male police officers (with billy club and gun) there
> would be no such thing as women's "rights".
> would be no such thing as women's "rights".
Don't be ridiculous. There are plenty of capable female police officers
outside of backwards shitholes like the muslim countries.
outside of backwards shitholes like the muslim countries.
>> That's Medieval thinking at best.
>
> As opposed to denial of reality.
>
> As opposed to denial of reality.
Sounds like you're a patriarchal, condescending, misogynistic male
chauvinist pig in denial of the reality that you're a dinosaur from last
century to me, to be precise.
chauvinist pig in denial of the reality that you're a dinosaur from last
century to me, to be precise.
>> Leadership is a quality of the mind,
>
> Leadership requires enforcement, at the point of a gun.
>
> Leadership requires enforcement, at the point of a gun.
The only enforcement needed is the general prohibition against theft,
violence, and a few varieties of irresponsible and negligent behavior.
And men and women can equally participate in that endeavor, thanks in
part to the force-equalizer that is the gun. Which *you* mentioned.
violence, and a few varieties of irresponsible and negligent behavior.
And men and women can equally participate in that endeavor, thanks in
part to the force-equalizer that is the gun. Which *you* mentioned.
>> as is figuring out the best thing to do. So, logically, authority
>> should flow from *mental* ability, and in that area women and men are
>> emphatically equal.
>>
>> Although particular men and particular women may not be. For example,
>> obviously I'm smarter than you.
>
> I'll be happy to compare my mental achievements with some random troll
> on the Internet, any day.
>> should flow from *mental* ability, and in that area women and men are
>> emphatically equal.
>>
>> Although particular men and particular women may not be. For example,
>> obviously I'm smarter than you.
>
> I'll be happy to compare my mental achievements with some random troll
> on the Internet, any day.
Why would you want to compare your mental achievements with yourself?
It's not like you'll win. It'll be a tie every time.
It's not like you'll win. It'll be a tie every time.
>> Nobody's rewriting anything here except, perhaps, you. That was a
>> scientific article. Ancient hunter-gatherers were fairly egalitarian
>> between the sexes.
>
> Prehistoric women... Baby in one hand, rock in the other. You go girl!
>> scientific article. Ancient hunter-gatherers were fairly egalitarian
>> between the sexes.
>
> Prehistoric women... Baby in one hand, rock in the other. You go girl!
Children in such societies were reared by the whole tribe, fuckwit.
>>> The only reason ordinary women are "equal" these days is because they
>>> have become useful idiots of the ruling class.
>>
>> Some women *are* "of the ruling class". Get your head out of your cave
>> and look around.
>
> I'm anything but a Neanderthal.
>>> have become useful idiots of the ruling class.
>>
>> Some women *are* "of the ruling class". Get your head out of your cave
>> and look around.
>
> I'm anything but a Neanderthal.
Indeed; from all indications Neanderthals had far better attitudes
towards women than you do. You're far beneath Neanderthals. You're pond
scum.
towards women than you do. You're far beneath Neanderthals. You're pond
scum.
> I speak well enough for a stupid computer to understand what I say and
> to write it down.
> to write it down.
So does Koko the gorilla.
> In fact, 80% of what I do on a computer is via voice. In 20 years or
> so, you might that advanced.
> so, you might that advanced.
Utterly irrelevant to the topic, unless you're now also claiming that
women all have speech impediments compared to men.
women all have speech impediments compared to men.
>> Several countries have female leaders. Britain and Canada have had
>> women as prime ministers. In the US, the 2008 Democratic primary had
>> Hillary Clinton contending as a serious candidate to become the
>> Democratic presidential candidate. There are tons of women in Congress
>> and the Senate.
>
> In 1973, Richard Nixon appointed a woman to fill high-level
> administration positions with women. An interview with her was on C-SPAN
> not long ago. No doubt, someday we will have a woman president. True
> believers in the Church of an Ever Expanding Government will bow down to
> that miraculous sign, while 97% of our top 1000 companies will still be
> run by men.
>> women as prime ministers. In the US, the 2008 Democratic primary had
>> Hillary Clinton contending as a serious candidate to become the
>> Democratic presidential candidate. There are tons of women in Congress
>> and the Senate.
>
> In 1973, Richard Nixon appointed a woman to fill high-level
> administration positions with women. An interview with her was on C-SPAN
> not long ago. No doubt, someday we will have a woman president. True
> believers in the Church of an Ever Expanding Government will bow down to
> that miraculous sign, while 97% of our top 1000 companies will still be
> run by men.
Companies like Sara Lee, WellPoint, Liz Claiborne Inc., Linamar, Xerox,
Kraft Foods, Rite Aid, Lucent, and Pepsico?
Oh, wait ...
Kraft Foods, Rite Aid, Lucent, and Pepsico?
Oh, wait ...
> Ordinary women are useful idiots being used by the ruling class.
Hey, fuckhead.
Yeah, you, fuckhead.
N zvfbtlafgvp shpxjvg gung xabjf irel yvggyr nobhg gur hfrarg zrqvhz fnlf
jung?
Yeah, you, fuckhead.
N zvfbtlafgvp shpxjvg gung xabjf irel yvggyr nobhg gur hfrarg zrqvhz fnlf
jung?
> I'll be happy to compare my mental achievements with some random troll
> on the Internet, any day.
> on the Internet, any day.
As I already explained, it will be a tie.
>> not to have noticed that there are female police officers these days,
>> too?
>
> Female police officers tend to have their guns taken away from them,
> resulting in the death of themselves and others, in the name of
> "political correctness".
[citation needed]
>> too?
>
> Female police officers tend to have their guns taken away from them,
> resulting in the death of themselves and others, in the name of
> "political correctness".
>>> She thinks that the current situation is unnatural, when in fact the
>>> only reason she has special rights is because ever-expanding
>>> government is making it that way.
>>>
>>> I'm not all that concerned. I am more or less just letting her know
>>> what's going to happen, so it won't be that much of a shock to her or
>>> to women who come after her. She may feel free to shoot up until the
>>> sad truth rears its ugly head.
>>
>> Is that a threat of some sort?
>
> Women's "rights" are a fabrication of the ruling class. Originally
> probably because the ruling class wanted to keep their property in the
> family. Then to pit ordinary men and women against each other for cheap
> labor. That wasn't enough, so now they're employing communist Chinese
> slave labor, with the approval of ordinary women who want lower prices
> and couldn't care less about their fellow countrymen or our
> manufacturing capability. Nowadays, gender "equality" also helps keep
> ordinary people subjugated. It's classic "divide and conquer". The
> ruling class promote sex warfare in order to win the class warfare. And
> it's working. Ordinary women are ruling class useful idiots. They don't
> see (or care) that everything is falling apart around them, all that
> matters is their next "rights" fix. Democrats care about ordinary women
> like a drug dealer cares about its users.
[citation needed] for every point in the above kooky conspiracy theory.
> Democracy is great until its filthy hands reach beyond the head of
> household.
> household.
What's that, an attempted defense of wifebeating and spousal rape?
Fuck you.
Fuck you.
> Our founders had no idea that ordinary women were going to be
> used to destroy common families.
[citation needed]
> used to destroy common families.
> Otherwise they would have prevented that by providing something like a
> separation between family and state, similar to the federalism
> difference between state and federal government.
And there go most of the civil rights protections, even the protections
against slavery enacted after the Civil War. Way to go, fuckhead! You
just set the Republic's hard-won civil rights back about a century and a
half!
against slavery enacted after the Civil War. Way to go, fuckhead! You
just set the Republic's hard-won civil rights back about a century and a
half!
>> A threat of what?
>
> Is reality that scary to a cannibal-left liberal?
>
> Is reality that scary to a cannibal-left liberal?
I am pretty sure she's questioning whether your kooky little "movement"
even has the guts to do anything but blather on usenet; so, whether it
even is "reality" that this alleged overthrow is going to happen.
even has the guts to do anything but blather on usenet; so, whether it
even is "reality" that this alleged overthrow is going to happen.
>> You and your fundie buddies planning to overthrow the republic?
>
> Thomas Jefferson admired women who were soft, passive, modest, and
> chaste, and who possessed such artistic talents as made them ornaments
> of a masculine world.
>
> Thomas Jefferson admired women who were soft, passive, modest, and
> chaste, and who possessed such artistic talents as made them ornaments
> of a masculine world.
Then Thomas Jefferson can go fuck himself for all I care. It's amazing
how, because someone got something right that predecessors kept getting
wrong, people will assume he's infallible in every respect. Thomas
Jefferson, for all that he achieved, was a flawed, fairly ordinary human
being and a product of his times. He has since been surpassed, as he
himself had surpassed previous world leaders that had even poorer
conceptions of how a country should be run.
how, because someone got something right that predecessors kept getting
wrong, people will assume he's infallible in every respect. Thomas
Jefferson, for all that he achieved, was a flawed, fairly ordinary human
being and a product of his times. He has since been surpassed, as he
himself had surpassed previous world leaders that had even poorer
conceptions of how a country should be run.
> As mothers and housekeepers they were domestic workhorses, but as
> sexual objects they must be delicate and beautiful, living works of art
> existing in an imaginative world of romantic love.
> sexual objects they must be delicate and beautiful, living works of art
> existing in an imaginative world of romantic love.
We're people, dickwad. Not "workhorses" and certainly not "objects" or
"ornaments". "People" like you that want to treat large swathes of the
population as domesticated beasts of burden, at best, give the whole
species a bad name.
"ornaments". "People" like you that want to treat large swathes of the
population as domesticated beasts of burden, at best, give the whole
species a bad name.
> (McLaughlin, 1988, p. 195).
>
> I will be happy to match my patriotism with a cannibal-left liberal, any
> day.
>
> I will be happy to match my patriotism with a cannibal-left liberal, any
> day.
§pamßµstèr
Aug 11, 2012, 7:14:56 PM8/11/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"Nadegda" <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
news:k06opl$j5q$1...@dont-email.me...
Path: not-for-mail
From: Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,can.politics,misc.survivalism,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:10:46 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 260
Message-ID: <k06opl$j5q$1...@dont-email.me>
References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me>
<567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>
<f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed...@k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
<k00o6l$cil$1...@dont-email.me>
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me>
<567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>
<f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed...@k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:10:46 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="8548ac9dfaaa093bc1274401f645d49a";
logging-data="19642"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org <<
===============
"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189AjdoeXmsm5Z4vzgsSr1vRwWp5VGbv70="
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6LEind9vkMstIy6Xnhxij5AuhEU=
X-Received-Bytes: 12201
Xref: Hurricane alt.politics.usa.republican:1458477 rec.arts.tv:1786988
can.politics:1415395 misc.survivalism:1037079 alt.usenet.kooks:1720117
§pamßµstèr
Aug 11, 2012, 7:15:57 PM8/11/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"Nadegda" <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
news:k06ojs$70p$1...@dont-email.me...
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"Nadegda" <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
rock, worm.
Ashley Johnson
Aug 11, 2012, 8:23:56 PM8/11/12
to
> "Ashley Johnson"
Liar.
Liar.
Ashley Johnson
Aug 11, 2012, 8:33:40 PM8/11/12
to
On Aug 9, 4:23 pm, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> The average man is by far physically more capable than the average
> woman.
Not relevant.
> The average man is by far physically more capable than the average
> woman.
> > And why do you think that authority should flow from physical
> > ability?
>
> Because that's the way it flows from cannibal-left liberal
> ever-expanding government. That's how ordinary women's "rights"
> are enforced. Without male police officers (with billy club and
> gun) there would be no such thing as women's "rights".
> > That's Medieval thinking at best.
>
> As opposed to denial of reality.
centuries ago.
> > Leadership is a quality of the mind,
>
> Leadership requires enforcement, at the point of a gun.
> > Although particular men and particular women may not be. For
> > example, obviously I'm smarter than you.
>
> I'll be happy to compare my mental achievements with some random
> troll on the Internet, any day.
assumed *you* were some random troll on the Internet.
> > Nobody's rewriting anything here except, perhaps, you. That was
> > a scientific article. Ancient hunter-gatherers were fairly
> > egalitarian between the sexes.
>
> Prehistoric women... Baby in one hand, rock in the other. You go
> girl!
shared between both parents, or even with a whole village. And was,
back then.
> I'm anything but a Neanderthal.
that? Or did you think Neanderthals were still around that recently?
Maybe you even believe you are one (as well as that it's still the
Middle Ages), hence your vehement denial of being one and your
simultaneous implication that they were around in the Middle Ages.
> In 1973, Richard Nixon appointed a woman to fill high-level
> administration positions with women. An interview with her was on
> C-SPAN not long ago. No doubt, someday we will have a woman
> president. True believers in the Church of an Ever Expanding
> Government will bow down to that miraculous sign, while 97% of our
> top 1000 companies will still be run by men.
stuck your head out of your cave in Afghanistan once in a while.
You are in a cave in Afghanistan, right? That's where I heard your
type hid. Misogynistic Middle Ages freaks that want to pull down
Western civilization, as you threatened to do in an earlier post.
> Ordinary women are useful idiots being used by the ruling class.
> >> Stuff is falling apart around them, but like drug addicts, they
> >> just can't wait for their next fix. If not for male police
> >> officers (with billy club and gun) to do your dirty work (while
> >> you pretend that your hands are clean), you wouldn't have
> >> unnatural rights.
>
> > Are you really delusional or stuck-in-a-cave enough
>
> I'll be happy to compare my mental achievements with some random
> troll on the Internet, any day.
> > not to have noticed that there are female police officers these
> > days, too?
>
> Female police officers tend to have their guns taken away from
> them, resulting in the death of themselves and others,
propaganda, moron?
> >> She thinks that the current situation is unnatural, when in
> >> fact the only reason she has special rights is because
> >> ever-expanding government is making it that way.
>
> >> I'm not all that concerned. I am more or less just letting her
> >> know what's going to happen, so it won't be that much of a
> >> shock to her or to women who come after her. She may feel free
> >> to shoot up until the sad truth rears its ugly head.
>
> > Is that a threat of some sort?
>
> Women's "rights" are a fabrication of the ruling class. Originally
Evading the question, terrorist? Why is that?
You are a terrorist, right? That's what they call you guys who hate
women, fear women, and claim an intent to pull down Western
civilization from your caves in shitpot countries like Afghanistan,
isn't it?
Çons@minority#s
Aug 11, 2012, 8:38:40 PM8/11/12
to
news:a32374d5-9692-4e31...@q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
John Doe
Aug 11, 2012, 8:45:26 PM8/11/12
to
A tough-guy-wannabe ranting troll, that for some strange reason double posts.
noarchive and/or nymshifting
changes the follow-up groups
Nadegda <nad318b404 gmail.invalid> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Nadegda <nad318b404 gmail.invalid>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,can.politics,misc.survivalism,alt.usenet.kooks
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me>
noarchive and/or nymshifting
changes the follow-up groups
Nadegda <nad318b404 gmail.invalid> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Nadegda <nad318b404 gmail.invalid>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,can.politics,misc.survivalism,alt.usenet.kooks
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:10:46 +0000 (UTC)
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 260
> Message-ID: <k06opl$j5q$1 dont-email.me>
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:10:46 +0000 (UTC)
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 260
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:10:46 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8548ac9dfaaa093bc1274401f645d49a"; logging-data="19642"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189AjdoeXmsm5Z4vzgsSr1vRwWp5VGbv70="
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:10:46 +0000 (UTC)
> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:6LEind9vkMstIy6Xnhxij5AuhEU=
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180704 rec.arts.tv:562211 can.politics:285512 misc.survivalism:303929 alt.usenet.kooks:260195
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:6LEind9vkMstIy6Xnhxij5AuhEU=
John Doe
Aug 11, 2012, 8:48:55 PM8/11/12
to
And yet another hit out of the ballpark.
Maybe we can continue this discussion when it learns
to act like a grown-up.
see also Google Groups
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 117
> Message-ID: <a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344731620 23860 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2012 00:33:40 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:33:40 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.198.100.230; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180721 rec.arts.tv:562255 misc.survivalism:303941 can.politics:285530
Maybe we can continue this discussion when it learns
to act like a grown-up.
see also Google Groups
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 117
> Message-ID: <a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.198.100.230
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344731620 23860 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2012 00:33:40 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:33:40 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.198.100.230; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180721 rec.arts.tv:562255 misc.survivalism:303941 can.politics:285530
Nadegda
Aug 11, 2012, 8:49:15 PM8/11/12
to
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:45:26 +0000, John Doe wrote:
> A tough-guy-wannabe ranting troll, that for some strange reason double
> posts.
Hello, tough-guy-wannabe ranting troll; my name is Nadegda. And now that
> A tough-guy-wannabe ranting troll, that for some strange reason double
> posts.
we've been formally introduced...
> noarchive and/or nymshifting
Got proof of that, kooky?
> changes the follow-up groups
Only to replace the nonexistent group sac.politics with a newsgroup I
thought might be a more suitable audience for your "viewpoint".
[200+ lines of quoted text with no new commentary interspersed]
Had a brain fart there, kooky? Or are you deciding to avoid addressing
any of my points?
Coward.
Ashley Johnson
Aug 11, 2012, 8:44:29 PM8/11/12
to
On Aug 12, 12:38 am, "Çons@minority#s" <Çons®@minorit...@not.ca>
wrote:
> "Ashley Johnson" <ajohnson44...@gmail.com> wrote in message
quote-editing boy-lover! I *disagree* with the poster that *really*
said that.
Go jump off a cliff!
wrote:
> "Ashley Johnson" <ajohnson44...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:a32374d5-9692-4e31...@q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
> > The average man is by far physically more capable than the average
> > woman.
No-good lying four-flushing snake-licking turd-sniffing dishonest
> > The average man is by far physically more capable than the average
> > woman.
quote-editing boy-lover! I *disagree* with the poster that *really*
said that.
Go jump off a cliff!
Ashley Johnson
Aug 11, 2012, 8:56:57 PM8/11/12
to
On Aug 12, 12:48 am, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> And yet another hit out of the ballpark.
Next time you should try not throwing a lazy one right over the plate.
> And yet another hit out of the ballpark.
> Maybe we can continue this discussion when it learns
> to act like a grown-up.
can make a note in my appointment calendar.
And if you're going to snip and run like a coward, at least actually
do the snipping part instead of just top-posting? For bandwidth's sake.
John Doe
Aug 11, 2012, 9:00:25 PM8/11/12
to
Just another tough-guy-wannabe on the Internet weirdo that insults
its adversary with every breath.
noarchive and/or nymshifting
changes the follow-up groups
Nadegda <nad318b404 gmail.invalid> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Nadegda <nad318b404 gmail.invalid>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,alt.usenet.kooks,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Message-ID: <k06uib$j5q$11 dont-email.me>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me> <k06opl$j5q$1 dont-email.me> <k06ub6$a03$1 dont-email.me>
> Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8548ac9dfaaa093bc1274401f645d49a"; logging-data="19642"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1891kCefFdAFW8ACxpE4KzCX/sWhXYJhkQ="
> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:K9lLvZkak2rdLbdxlCBzNS87z8E=
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180725 rec.arts.tv:562264 alt.usenet.kooks:260253 misc.survivalism:303945 can.politics:285536
its adversary with every breath.
noarchive and/or nymshifting
changes the follow-up groups
Nadegda <nad318b404 gmail.invalid> wrote:
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Nadegda <nad318b404 gmail.invalid>
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:49:15 +0000 (UTC)
> Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 23
> Message-ID: <k06uib$j5q$11 dont-email.me>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me> <k06opl$j5q$1 dont-email.me> <k06ub6$a03$1 dont-email.me>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:49:15 +0000 (UTC)
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8548ac9dfaaa093bc1274401f645d49a"; logging-data="19642"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1891kCefFdAFW8ACxpE4KzCX/sWhXYJhkQ="
> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:K9lLvZkak2rdLbdxlCBzNS87z8E=
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180725 rec.arts.tv:562264 alt.usenet.kooks:260253 misc.survivalism:303945 can.politics:285536
John Doe
Aug 11, 2012, 9:04:19 PM8/11/12
to
Attempting a rational discussion with someone who doesn't know
that men are typically much more physically capable than women
would be like squeezing blood from a turnip.
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!w8g2000vbx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 12
> Distribution: usa
> Message-ID: <69624226-f254-4250-a8fe-72aa2333da82 w8g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me> <a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <IWCVr.43862$lt3.43202 newsfe18.iad>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.247.181.165
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:50:50 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: w8g2000vbx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.247.181.165; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
>
> On Aug 12, 12:38˙am, "€ons minority#s" <€ons© minorit... not.ca>
> wrote:
>> "Ashley Johnson" <ajohnson44... gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
that men are typically much more physically capable than women
would be like squeezing blood from a turnip.
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!w8g2000vbx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,us.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 12
> Distribution: usa
> Message-ID: <69624226-f254-4250-a8fe-72aa2333da82 w8g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me> <a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <IWCVr.43862$lt3.43202 newsfe18.iad>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.247.181.165
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344732650 1403 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2012 00:50:50 GMT)
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:50:50 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: w8g2000vbx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.247.181.165; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180727 rec.arts.tv:562265 misc.survivalism:303947 us.politics:68848
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
>
> On Aug 12, 12:38˙am, "€ons minority#s" <€ons© minorit... not.ca>
> wrote:
>> "Ashley Johnson" <ajohnson44... gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
John Doe
Aug 11, 2012, 9:13:16 PM8/11/12
to
I don't run, but I don't pretend to be a tough guy on the
Internet, either.
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 13
> Message-ID: <d8f4dca3-8aee-42f8-98d0-df8a324333dd g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me> <a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <k06uhn$a03$2 dont-email.me>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 31.172.30.3
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:58:52 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=31.172.30.3; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
Internet, either.
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 13
> Message-ID: <d8f4dca3-8aee-42f8-98d0-df8a324333dd g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me> <a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <k06uhn$a03$2 dont-email.me>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 31.172.30.3
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344733132 5937 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2012 00:58:52 GMT)
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:58:52 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=31.172.30.3; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180728 rec.arts.tv:562268 misc.survivalism:303948 can.politics:285537
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
Checkmate
Aug 11, 2012, 9:13:22 PM8/11/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what §pamßµstèr said:
>
> --
> SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
Thank you.
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
"There are many here among us...
who feel that life is but a joke."
Checkmate!
First, check out what §pamßµstèr said:
>
> --
> SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
"There are many here among us...
who feel that life is but a joke."
Checkmate
Aug 11, 2012, 9:13:52 PM8/11/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what §pamßµstèr said:
>
Checkmate!
First, check out what §pamßµstèr said:
>
> --
> SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
Thank you.
> SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
> "Nadegda" <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:k06ojs$70p$1...@dont-email.me...
> rock, worm.
BeamMeUpScotty
Aug 11, 2012, 9:28:26 PM8/11/12
to
It's nothing more complicated than feminists are failures trying to get
around their failure.
--
*Rumination*
#47 - ObamaCare is like a box of Cracker Jacks, you had to buy it to
find out what the surprise inside was? It was Slavery "surprise".
Ashley Johnson
Aug 11, 2012, 9:30:48 PM8/11/12
to
On Aug 12, 1:13 am, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> I don't run, but I don't pretend to be a tough guy on the
> Internet, either.
*ROTFL!!!*
> I don't run, but I don't pretend to be a tough guy on the
> Internet, either.
*gasp*
This from the guy that threatened to end Western civilization a few
posts ago and who keeps harping about how "physically capable" and
able to project "authority" (i.e., how tough) men are?
You've got to be joking, right?
Pull the other one.
§pamßµstèr
Aug 11, 2012, 9:31:26 PM8/11/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"John Doe" <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
news:k06vvb$dvu$4...@dont-email.me...
Path: not-for-mail
From: John Doe <jd...@usenetlove.invalid>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <k06vvb$dvu$4...@dont-email.me>
References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me>
<567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>
<f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed...@k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
<k00o6l$cil$1...@dont-email.me>
<a32374d5-9692-4e31...@q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me>
<567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>
<f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed...@k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
<k00o6l$cil$1...@dont-email.me>
<k06uhn$a03$2...@dont-email.me>
<d8f4dca3-8aee-42f8...@g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="9578344d06fb783b067e1aae74cc1b11";
logging-data="14334"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org <<
=============
"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+y+K7gfnFads9ISrGJAR9k0v5Fzc7UlQY="
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
Cancel-Lock: sha1:isvnEga0FWrunsR6OMrxS3RmK7U=
X-Received-Bytes: 4039
Xref: Hurricane alt.politics.usa.republican:1458515 rec.arts.tv:1787065
sac.politics:11045 misc.survivalism:1037104 can.politics:1415425
§pamßµstèr
Aug 11, 2012, 9:33:29 PM8/11/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"Ashley Johnson" <ajohns...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d8f4dca3-8aee-42f8...@g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
Path: not-for-mail
From: Ashley Johnson <ajohns...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 13
Message-ID:
<d8f4dca3-8aee-42f8...@g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me>
<567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>
<f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed...@k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
<k00o6l$cil$1...@dont-email.me>
<a32374d5-9692-4e31...@q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
<k06uhn$a03$2...@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 31.172.30.3
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me>
<567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>
<f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed...@k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
<k00o6l$cil$1...@dont-email.me>
<a32374d5-9692-4e31...@q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
<k06uhn$a03$2...@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344733132 5937 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2012 00:58:52
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:58:52 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=31.172.30.3;
posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
X-Received-Bytes: 2142
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
Xref: Hurricane alt.politics.usa.republican:1458503 rec.arts.tv:1787054
sac.politics:11040 misc.survivalism:1037100 can.politics:1415420
Ashley Johnson
Aug 11, 2012, 9:28:43 PM8/11/12
to
On Aug 12, 1:04 am, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> Attempting a rational discussion with someone who doesn't know
> that men are typically much more physically capable than women
> would be like squeezing blood from a turnip.
Did I claim that they weren't? If so, would you care to post a link to
> Attempting a rational discussion with someone who doesn't know
> that men are typically much more physically capable than women
> would be like squeezing blood from a turnip.
the post where I did as proof?
And would you mind trimming any quoted material you aren't going to
use?
§pamßµstèr
Aug 11, 2012, 9:34:56 PM8/11/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
"Nadegda" <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
news:k06uib$j5q$1...@dont-email.me...
Path: not-for-mail
From: Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups:
Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:49:15 +0000 (UTC)
Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <k06uib$j5q$1...@dont-email.me>
References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me>
<567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>
<f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed...@k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
<k00o6l$cil$1...@dont-email.me> <k06opl$j5q$1...@dont-email.me>
<jvqap4$rnb$1...@dont-email.me>
<567f1cd0-5fae-4c61...@f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<jvrtk3$8ql$1...@dont-email.me>
<f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed...@k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
<k06ub6$a03$1...@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:49:15 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="8548ac9dfaaa093bc1274401f645d49a";
logging-data="19642"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org <<
===============
"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1891kCefFdAFW8ACxpE4KzCX/sWhXYJhkQ="
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Cancel-Lock: sha1:K9lLvZkak2rdLbdxlCBzNS87z8E=
X-Received-Bytes: 2042
Xref: Hurricane alt.politics.usa.republican:1458500 rec.arts.tv:1787050
alt.usenet.kooks:1720183 misc.survivalism:1037097 can.politics:1415419
John Doe
Aug 11, 2012, 9:35:42 PM8/11/12
to
Oh no! Not the kill file!!!
John Doe
Aug 11, 2012, 9:37:11 PM8/11/12
to
loony...
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.bbs-scene.org!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 15
> Message-ID: <6d8eb770-bfb5-4667-8250-0303d64636a7 r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me> <a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <k06uhn$a03$2 dont-email.me> <d8f4dca3-8aee-42f8-98d0-df8a324333dd g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <k06vvb$dvu$4 dont-email.me>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.250.127.236
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:30:48 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.250.127.236; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.bbs-scene.org!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 15
> Message-ID: <6d8eb770-bfb5-4667-8250-0303d64636a7 r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com>
> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me> <a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <k06uhn$a03$2 dont-email.me> <d8f4dca3-8aee-42f8-98d0-df8a324333dd g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <k06vvb$dvu$4 dont-email.me>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.250.127.236
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344735048 25475 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2012 01:30:48 GMT)
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:30:48 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.250.127.236; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180744 rec.arts.tv:562285 misc.survivalism:303954 can.politics:285545
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
Checkmate
Aug 12, 2012, 1:00:23 AM8/12/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what §pamßµstèr said:
>
Checkmate!
First, check out what §pamßµstèr said:
>
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
"There are many here among us...
who feel that life is but a joke."
Fred Hall
Aug 12, 2012, 2:31:32 AM8/12/12
to
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be
Fred Hall
Aug 12, 2012, 3:18:12 AM8/12/12
to
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:37:11 +0000 (UTC), John Doe <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>loony...
The loon posting as Ashley is a Paul Derbyshire sock.
The loon posting as Ashley just won 7 awards in the July 2012 Kook Awards.
August 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/august-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
>loony...
The loon posting as Ashley is a Paul Derbyshire sock.
The loon posting as Ashley just won 7 awards in the July 2012 Kook Awards.
>
>Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.bbs-scene.org!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
>> From: Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com>
>> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
>> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
>> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
>> Organization: http://groups.google.com
>> Lines: 15
>> Message-ID: <6d8eb770-bfb5-4667-8250-0303d64636a7 r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com>
>> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me> <a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <k06uhn$a03$2 dont-email.me> <d8f4dca3-8aee-42f8-98d0-df8a324333dd g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <k06vvb$dvu$4 dont-email.me>
>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.250.127.236
>> Mime-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344735048 25475 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2012 01:30:48 GMT)
>> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
>> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:30:48 +0000 (UTC)
>> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
>> Injection-Info: r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.250.127.236; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
>> User-Agent: G2/1.0
>> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
>> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180744 rec.arts.tv:562285 misc.survivalism:303954 can.politics:285545
>>
>Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.bbs-scene.org!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
>> From: Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44109 gmail.com>
>> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,rec.arts.tv,sac.politics,misc.survivalism,can.politics
>> Subject: Re: 10 Reasons Why Nasty Feminists Hate Conservative Women
>> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
>> Organization: http://groups.google.com
>> Lines: 15
>> Message-ID: <6d8eb770-bfb5-4667-8250-0303d64636a7 r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com>
>> References: <64a36b4e5b5636e3b9f18a7100727e06 msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <jvqap4$rnb$1 dont-email.me> <567f1cd0-5fae-4c61-a82d-d4e6de5874ec f7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <jvrtk3$8ql$1 dont-email.me> <f5b4e8b4-2ccd-46ed-a132-46daffb7f583 k21g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k00o6l$cil$1 dont-email.me> <a32374d5-9692-4e31-aab8-ea6da27cbcff q3g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <k06uhn$a03$2 dont-email.me> <d8f4dca3-8aee-42f8-98d0-df8a324333dd g13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <k06vvb$dvu$4 dont-email.me>
>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.250.127.236
>> Mime-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1344735048 25475 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2012 01:30:48 GMT)
>> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
>> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:30:48 +0000 (UTC)
>> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
>> Injection-Info: r2g2000pbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.250.127.236; posting-account=j7pfMAoAAADmFqJlVe7qtTOmYXOk8be9
>> User-Agent: G2/1.0
>> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe)
>> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:180744 rec.arts.tv:562285 misc.survivalism:303954 can.politics:285545
>>
>> On Aug 12, 1:13˙am, John Doe <j... usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>>> I don't run, but I don't pretend to be a tough guy on the
>>> Internet, either.
>>
>> *ROTFL!!!*
>>
>> *gasp*
>>
>> This from the guy that threatened to end Western civilization a few
>> posts ago and who keeps harping about how "physically capable" and
>> able to project "authority" (i.e., how tough) men are?
>>
>> You've got to be joking, right?
>>
>> Pull the other one.
>>
--
>>> I don't run, but I don't pretend to be a tough guy on the
>>> Internet, either.
>>
>> *ROTFL!!!*
>>
>> *gasp*
>>
>> This from the guy that threatened to end Western civilization a few
>> posts ago and who keeps harping about how "physically capable" and
>> able to project "authority" (i.e., how tough) men are?
>>
>> You've got to be joking, right?
>>
>> Pull the other one.
>>
August 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/august-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
Message has been deleted
Rock Quarry
Aug 12, 2012, 4:38:53 AM8/12/12
to
On Aug 7, 12:37 am, "Jack Kohnen" <jkah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-
> hate-conservative-women/
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-
> ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
>
> According to the Progressives, women cannot be real women if
> they don t fit the Progressives script. Yep, if a woman doesn t
> march to the Left s horse dung definition regarding what they
> (whoever the heck they are) have determined constitutes a real
> woman, she is illegitimate. Here s 10 reasons why I believe the
> dour democratic dames dislike Conservative women.
Women in North America are now better educated than men, because more
women go to University.
The ratio is growing year-to-year. And that's not just shit like
getting a Liberal Arts Degree in Economics or basket weaving (is there
a difference?), but they're becoming Engineers, Doctors and other
professionals. More women graduate from MBA programs in the USA than
men.
Right wingers supported Rush Limbaugh during the "Slut" remark, and
that proves which side that right wingers are on. Right wingers
oppose women's reproductive rights because they oppose their right to
choose to terminate a pregnancy or not, and it appears that if a woman
wants birth control under basic taxpayer funded health care, that's
bad too. Despite how women are 53% of our society and are now
increasing their income, not because of equal rights legislation, but
because they are becoming the bread winners in the respected family
unit more and more due to being better educated.
Of course the big deal about homosexual marriage offends rightists,
because they dream of two men kissing. Not like former Vice President
Dick Cheney's well educated and successful daughter Mary, who had a
baster boy child with her partner (a female park ranger) and made Dick
a proud Grandfather!
Needless to say, Cheney supports gay marriage. He may be an evil,
despicable old fart, but he knows and accepts his family.
Do "Feminists" exist anymore? Like bona fide man eaters like Ann
Coulter?
> http://clashdaily.com/2012/08/10-reasons-why-nasty-feminists-
> hate-conservative-women/
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-
> ZMO5803t0&feature=player_embedded
>
> According to the Progressives, women cannot be real women if
> they don t fit the Progressives script. Yep, if a woman doesn t
> march to the Left s horse dung definition regarding what they
> (whoever the heck they are) have determined constitutes a real
> woman, she is illegitimate. Here s 10 reasons why I believe the
> dour democratic dames dislike Conservative women.
Women in North America are now better educated than men, because more
women go to University.
The ratio is growing year-to-year. And that's not just shit like
getting a Liberal Arts Degree in Economics or basket weaving (is there
a difference?), but they're becoming Engineers, Doctors and other
professionals. More women graduate from MBA programs in the USA than
men.
Right wingers supported Rush Limbaugh during the "Slut" remark, and
that proves which side that right wingers are on. Right wingers
oppose women's reproductive rights because they oppose their right to
choose to terminate a pregnancy or not, and it appears that if a woman
wants birth control under basic taxpayer funded health care, that's
bad too. Despite how women are 53% of our society and are now
increasing their income, not because of equal rights legislation, but
because they are becoming the bread winners in the respected family
unit more and more due to being better educated.
Of course the big deal about homosexual marriage offends rightists,
because they dream of two men kissing. Not like former Vice President
Dick Cheney's well educated and successful daughter Mary, who had a
baster boy child with her partner (a female park ranger) and made Dick
a proud Grandfather!
Needless to say, Cheney supports gay marriage. He may be an evil,
despicable old fart, but he knows and accepts his family.
Do "Feminists" exist anymore? Like bona fide man eaters like Ann
Coulter?
Rock Quarry
Aug 12, 2012, 4:46:31 AM8/12/12
to
Ann Coulter is not a Feminist, she's the perfect example of a
submissive, bare foot and pregnant American female. Hell, she'd make
a great old lady in an outlaw biker gang.
Good to set the record straight.
Ashley Johnson
Aug 12, 2012, 1:21:02 PM8/12/12
to
On Aug 12, 1:33 am, "§pamßµstèr" <§pamßµstèr...@news.ca> wrote:
> --
> SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
>
> "Ashley Johnson" <ajohnson44...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> --
> SPAMMED INTO IRRELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT
>
Yeah, we've long since noticed that you keep spamming into irrelevant
newsgroups. Also morphing the accented characters in your handle, just
to inconvenience even those that have the benefit of a killfile,
which, sadly, as a Google Groups user I do not.
Planning to cut it out sometime soon?
Ashley Johnson
Aug 12, 2012, 1:25:32 PM8/12/12
to
On Aug 12, 7:18 am, Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Derbyshire sock.
Clearly, all three of those can't be correct, so the odds of any one
of them being correct are no better than 33%.
What is your claim based on? I haven't seen anything in the way of
proof offered by any of the people accusing me of being any kind of
sock. Of course, I know why ... it's because all three of the
accusations are wrong, rather than just two of them.
As for your Kook Awards, I couldn't care less if your opinion of me is
that I'm a kook. Why should your opinion matter to me? You're not any
sort of influential mover and shaker, at least so far as I am aware.
So you can take your Kook Awards and shove them where the sun doesn't
shine. Sideways.
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:37:11 +0000 (UTC), John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> >loony...
>
> The loon posting as Ashley is a Paul Derbyshire sock.
> The loon posting as Ashley just won 7 awards in the July 2012 Kook Awards.
I've been told I'm a Ubiquitous sock, a trotsky sock, *and* a Paul
> >loony...
>
> The loon posting as Ashley is a Paul Derbyshire sock.
> The loon posting as Ashley just won 7 awards in the July 2012 Kook Awards.
Derbyshire sock.
Clearly, all three of those can't be correct, so the odds of any one
of them being correct are no better than 33%.
What is your claim based on? I haven't seen anything in the way of
proof offered by any of the people accusing me of being any kind of
sock. Of course, I know why ... it's because all three of the
accusations are wrong, rather than just two of them.
As for your Kook Awards, I couldn't care less if your opinion of me is
that I'm a kook. Why should your opinion matter to me? You're not any
sort of influential mover and shaker, at least so far as I am aware.
So you can take your Kook Awards and shove them where the sun doesn't
shine. Sideways.
Ashley Johnson
Aug 12, 2012, 1:29:54 PM8/12/12
to
On Aug 12, 7:42 am, Derbyshire Police <laugh...@u.kook> wrote:
> [snip garbage] Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I beg your pardon? Are you accusing me of spamming?
>
> You are a spammer, Paul.
Who is Paul?
> > I don't multipost,
>
> Liar.
Prove that I'm a liar or retract that.
> Detective Chief Inspector Hawkins
> Softly Softly Task Force Division Unit Squad
> SWAT Team (Sockpuppet Washer And Tumbledryer)
>
> Derbyshite Police
>
> No Seamus Can Beat Us
This is an unmoderated newsgroup. It has no "sockpuppet police", which
explains your inadequate training for the role that has resulted in
your gross negligence and incompetence in "arresting" an innocent
suspect.
Turn in your badge, wannabe netcop.
P.S. I may be a lowly "giggle groper" or whatever the epithet-du-jour
is but I know enough about how this thingy works not to be tricked by
followup-to games or by adding nonexistent groups to the distribution.
So don't bother with trying *that* nonsense on me again.
> [snip garbage] Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I beg your pardon? Are you accusing me of spamming?
>
> You are a spammer, Paul.
Who is Paul?
> > I don't multipost,
>
> Liar.
Prove that I'm a liar or retract that.
> Detective Chief Inspector Hawkins
> Softly Softly Task Force Division Unit Squad
> SWAT Team (Sockpuppet Washer And Tumbledryer)
>
> Derbyshite Police
>
> No Seamus Can Beat Us
This is an unmoderated newsgroup. It has no "sockpuppet police", which
explains your inadequate training for the role that has resulted in
your gross negligence and incompetence in "arresting" an innocent
suspect.
Turn in your badge, wannabe netcop.
P.S. I may be a lowly "giggle groper" or whatever the epithet-du-jour
is but I know enough about how this thingy works not to be tricked by
followup-to games or by adding nonexistent groups to the distribution.
So don't bother with trying *that* nonsense on me again.
Gunner
Aug 12, 2012, 1:44:15 PM8/12/12
to
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:38:53 -0700 (PDT), Rock Quarry
<agamem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Right wingers supported Rush Limbaugh during the "Slut" remark, and
>that proves which side that right wingers are on. Right wingers
>oppose women's reproductive rights because they oppose their right to
>choose to terminate a pregnancy or not,
You mean we oppose the "right" of a woman to kill a baby?
<agamem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Right wingers supported Rush Limbaugh during the "Slut" remark, and
>that proves which side that right wingers are on. Right wingers
>oppose women's reproductive rights because they oppose their right to
>choose to terminate a pregnancy or not,
Actually...I dont oppose it. In fact...I fully believe that the woman
should have the right to terminate that baby up to the moment the baby
turns into a legal adult at 18 yrs of age. Without question.
Given that abortion has killed some 15 million potential Leftwing
voters since Roe v Wade..... long before the age of majority when they
become dangerous..abortion has been a very good thing for this nation
in some aspects. We have 15 million fewer future criminals.
As for increasing the age limite of legal abortions to 18..that would
indeed put a much greater end to even more criminals by the people
best suited to determining if they should live or be
terminated...their mothers.
Ill expect you to support our call to increase the age limit of
abortions. Will you join with us?
Afterall..survival of the fittest would benefit the Leftwing community
multifold.
Gunner
One bleeding-heart type asked me in a recent interview if I did not
agree that "violence begets violence." I told him that it is my
earnest endeavor to see that it does. I would like very much to ensure
- and in some cases I have - that any man who offers violence to his
fellow citizen begets a whole lot more in return than he can enjoy.
- Jeff Cooper
Gunner
Aug 12, 2012, 1:45:04 PM8/12/12
to
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:46:31 -0700 (PDT), Rock Quarry
<agamem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Do "Feminists" exist anymore? Like bona fide man eaters like Ann
>> Coulter?
>
>Sorry man. I went off on a tangent.
>
>Ann Coulter is not a Feminist, she's the perfect example of a
>submissive, bare foot and pregnant American female. Hell, she'd make
>a great old lady in an outlaw biker gang.
>
>Good to set the record straight.
Ms Coulter has children?
<agamem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Do "Feminists" exist anymore? Like bona fide man eaters like Ann
>> Coulter?
>
>Sorry man. I went off on a tangent.
>
>Ann Coulter is not a Feminist, she's the perfect example of a
>submissive, bare foot and pregnant American female. Hell, she'd make
>a great old lady in an outlaw biker gang.
>
>Good to set the record straight.
John Doe
Aug 12, 2012, 1:45:29 PM8/12/12
to
It removes the Canadian group. Just replying to it isn't useful.
You should direct your follow-up to the Canadian group(s) if you
want to have any effect. It probably doesn't even follow these
groups. By replying, the only people you are annoying are people
in these groups.
You should direct your follow-up to the Canadian group(s) if you
want to have any effect. It probably doesn't even follow these
groups. By replying, the only people you are annoying are people
in these groups.
Checkmate
Aug 12, 2012, 1:52:50 PM8/12/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Checkmate!
convinced yet.
Checkmate
Aug 12, 2012, 1:55:51 PM8/12/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Ashley Johnson said:
>
Checkmate!
First, check out what Ashley Johnson said:
>
> On Aug 12, 7:42 am, Derbyshire Police <laugh...@u.kook> wrote:
> > [snip garbage] Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I beg your pardon? Are you accusing me of spamming?
> >
> > You are a spammer, Paul.
>
> Who is Paul?
>
> > > I don't multipost,
> >
> > Liar.
>
> Prove that I'm a liar or retract that.
Sorry. Once it's in, it stays in.
> > [snip garbage] Ashley Johnson <ajohnson44...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I beg your pardon? Are you accusing me of spamming?
> >
> > You are a spammer, Paul.
>
> Who is Paul?
>
> > > I don't multipost,
> >
> > Liar.
>
> Prove that I'm a liar or retract that.
> > Detective Chief Inspector Hawkins
> > Softly Softly Task Force Division Unit Squad
> > SWAT Team (Sockpuppet Washer And Tumbledryer)
> >
> > Derbyshite Police
> >
> > No Seamus Can Beat Us
>
> This is an unmoderated newsgroup. It has no "sockpuppet police", which
> explains your inadequate training for the role that has resulted in
> your gross negligence and incompetence in "arresting" an innocent
> suspect.
>
> Turn in your badge, wannabe netcop.
>
> P.S. I may be a lowly "giggle groper" or whatever the epithet-du-jour
> is but I know enough about how this thingy works not to be tricked by
> followup-to games or by adding nonexistent groups to the distribution.
> So don't bother with trying *that* nonsense on me again.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages