Zinger of the day!

[Ray Keller]

 

Sen. Cruz blasts Obama with one ‘blogger-grade sarcasm’ question

 

 Anyone know if President Obama intends to perform background checks on the Syrian rebels before providing them weapons?

[Kicking Ass and Taking Names]

WTF is Cruz's problem?? In the first place, he's a Canadian so it's
none of his business. In the second place, he needs to start with
Gramps McCain who is the one who forced Obama's hand. Without Gramps'
trip to Syria where he met with kidnappers and murderers, there would
be no US aid to these thugs.

[Harold Burton]

In article <5o64s8l99fj7uo7vb...@6ax.com>,
Licking Ass <PopUl...@hotmail.com> whined yet again:

It's good to know that even leftards admit that the Current Resident has
no spine and can easily be forced into action by a trip to the mid east
by "Gramps"




laugh . . . laugh . . . laugh

[Stormin Mormon]

Didn't you know? Illegal immigrants are exempt from all laws.
.
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
.
"Ray Keller" <Left...@re.desperate.com> wrote in message news:WSowt.20581$5w3....@newsfe03.iad...

[Frank]

Cruz was also born of an American mother while she and Cuban father were
working in Canada. He's surely as much of an American as Obama ;)

[Winston_Smith]

Please stop posting off topic political items to alt.suvival. Thank
you.

[PrecisionmachinisT]

"Winston_Smith" <inv...@butterfly.net> wrote in message
news:s7o4s8h875t4dc82q...@4ax.com...

> Please stop posting off topic political items to alt.suvival. Thank
> you.

While you're at it, Winston, please stop posting anything at all to
rec.crafts.metalworking.

That you have nothing worthwhile to contribute here is abundantly evident.

[Johnny Johnson]

In article <hal.i.burton-7858...@news.newsguy.com>, Hal Burton
<hal.i....@hotmail.com> says...
>
> In article <5o64s8l99fj7uo7vb...@6ax.com>,
> Licking Ass and Faking Names<PopUl...@hotmail.com> whined

> yet again:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:53:11 -0700, "Ray Keller"
>> <Left...@re.desperate.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sen. Cruz blasts Obama with one 'blogger-grade sarcasm' question
>>
>>> Anyone know if President Obama intends to perform background
>>> checks on the Syrian rebels before providing them weapons?
>>
>> WTF is Cruz's problem?? In the first place, he's a Canadian so it's
>> none of his business.
>

While Ted Cruz was born while his parents were in Canada working in the oil
business he's is 100% a United States Citizen: his mother was born in Delaware
and his Cuban expatriot father is a naturalized U.S. citizen.

Further; read: "Is Ted Cruz eligible under the Constitution to become
president?"
http://www.politifact.com/ohio/article/2013/may/09/ted-cruz-eligible-under-
constitution-become-presid/

And it's hilarious that an Obozo apologist like you should be bringing up
citizenship. <chuckle> :)

>
>> In the second place, he needs to start with Gramps McCain who is the
>> one who forced Obama's hand. Without Gramps' trip to Syria where he
>> met with kidnappers and murderers, there would be no US aid to these
>> thugs.
>
> It's good to know that even leftards admit that the Current Resident has
> no spine and can easily be forced into action by a trip to the mid east
> by "Gramps"
>
> laugh . . . laugh . . . laugh
>

I believe it's long past time for the U.S. to pull all its assets out of the
middle east and let them all go back to killing each other as they have done
for centuries.

If we open all our own oil sources to drilling we wouldn't need the arabs' oil
and they can try drinking it instead of using it to hold us hostage.

Then tell the Chinese to "go pound sand" -- that we aren't going to pay them
another single dollar of our "debt"; that we are pulling all the products they
are producing with their child labor; and that every single piece of property
they "own" in the U.S. is siezed under the power of Eminent Domain; the United
States would be a LOT better off than we are now.

BUT: that goes against the political agenda of the Liberal Socialist-in-Chief
and the Socialist Democrat Party of Amerika.

[Winston_Smith]

On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:37:17 -0700, "PrecisionmachinisT"
<precisionm...@notmail.com> wrote:
>"Winston_Smith" <inv...@butterfly.net>

>> Please stop posting off topic political items to alt.suvival. Thank
>> you.
>
>While you're at it, Winston, please stop posting anything at all to
>rec.crafts.metalworking.

Apologies.

Understood and I'll watch it. I posted that to all groups because I
have no idea which group on the list the original poster is from and
that's the only way that would-be repliers can delete my (our) home
group.

I'm pretty sure Gunner is in your group and while he has done
worthwhile posts on both survival and machining, he is a leading cross
poster and one of the culprits that lead political debaters to these
groups.

>That you have nothing worthwhile to contribute here is abundantly evident.

On that, you are correct. I monitor the group as a learning exercise
but so far I'm not certain I have screwdriver figured out.

[PrecisionmachinisT]

"Winston_Smith" <inv...@butterfly.net> wrote in message

news:j6l7s89vopa65ubd0...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:37:17 -0700, "PrecisionmachinisT"
> <precisionm...@notmail.com> wrote:
>>"Winston_Smith" <inv...@butterfly.net>
>
>>> Please stop posting off topic political items to alt.suvival. Thank
>>> you.
>>
>>While you're at it, Winston, please stop posting anything at all to
>>rec.crafts.metalworking.
>
> Apologies.
>

Accepted.

> Understood and I'll watch it. I posted that to all groups because I
> have no idea which group on the list the original poster is from and
> that's the only way that would-be repliers can delete my (our) home
> group.
>
> I'm pretty sure Gunner is in your group and while he has done

He rarely contributes anything worthwhile on the topic of metalworking, he
mostly just crossposts off topic political garbage and then issues veiled
death threats towards anyone whom he disagrees with.

> worthwhile posts on both survival and machining, he is a leading cross
> poster and one of the culprits that lead political debaters to these
> groups.

Killfile the dumb cocksucker.

>>That you have nothing worthwhile to contribute here is abundantly evident.
>
> On that, you are correct. I monitor the group as a learning exercise
> but so far I'm not certain I have screwdriver figured out.

No problem whatsoever with that.

[James Waldby]

On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:29:21 -0700, PrecisionmachinisT wrote:
> "Winston_Smith" ...wrote ...

>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:37:17 -0700, "PrecisionmachinisT"... wrote:
>>>"Winston_Smith" ... wrote:
>>
>>>> Please stop posting off topic political items to alt.suvival. Thank
>>>> you.
>>>
>>>While you're at it, Winston, please stop posting anything at all to
>>>rec.crafts.metalworking.
>>
>> Apologies.
>
> Accepted.
>
>> Understood and I'll watch it. I posted that to all groups because I
>> have no idea which group on the list the original poster is from and
>> that's the only way that would-be repliers can delete my (our) home
>> group.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure Gunner is in your group and while he has done
>
> He rarely contributes anything worthwhile on the topic of metalworking, he
> mostly just crossposts off topic political garbage and then issues veiled
> death threats towards anyone whom he disagrees with.
>
>> worthwhile posts on both survival and machining, he is a leading cross
>> poster and one of the culprits that lead political debaters to these
>> groups.
>
> Killfile the dumb cocksucker.
>
>>>That you have nothing worthwhile to contribute here is abundantly evident.
>>
>> On that, you are correct. I monitor the group as a learning exercise
>> but so far I'm not certain I have screwdriver figured out.
>
> No problem whatsoever with that.

What do you mean, no problem? Screwdrivers are so easy to
operate, there's no excuse for not knowing how to use one.
After you pour the jigger of vodka into the glass of orange
juice, just sit back and drink it at your leisure.

--
jiw

[Jeff M]

On 6/19/2013 3:53 PM, Ray Keller wrote:
>
> Sen. Cruz blasts Obama with one ‘blogger-grade sarcasm’ question

> <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3033174/posts>

>
> Anyone know if President Obama intends to perform background checks on
> the Syrian rebels before providing them weapons?

LOL
Ray's a well known poster of lies, idiocy and semi-literate buffoonery,
but his habit of gullibly re-posting the ignorant rantings and nonsense
written for fools is even worse.

Moreover, "Ray Keller" is a convicted felon for sexually assaulting a
teenager.
https://records.txdps.state.tx.us/SexOffender/PublicSite/Application/Search/Individual.aspx?IND_IDN=1608353&SearchType=Name&ResultsUrl=%2fSexOffender%2fPublicSite%2fApplication%2fSearch%2fResults.aspx%3fSearchType%3dName%26FirstName%3dRaymond%26LastName%3dKeller%26Birthdate%3d%26Sex%3d0%26Race%3d0%26CountyCode%3d0

[Winston_Smith]

On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:06:43 -0500, Jeff M <NoS...@NoThanks.org>
wrote:

>Ray's a well known poster of lies,

Oh, good. Another thread has deteriorated to the point where a brain
dead, right extremist and a brain dead left extremist have resumed
their years old pissing contest. Don't be frightened folks. They are
harmless because they are both totally ineffective and unbelievable.
This happens every month or so, but does nothing except bore those of
us with an IQ over 20. That's pretty much everyone except Ray and
Jeff.

For anyone new here, this consists - in it's entirety - of each of
them posting a link (always the same link) to prove the other one is
guilty of various crimes. One of the links includes pictures of two
different people both supposedly the cited usenet offender.

Both links clearly do not apply to the said piss-ees as is obvious
just using internal evidence. But small minds keep thinking someone is
out there, dumber than them, that might buy it. They are dumber than
rocks, and find even unlikely possibilities a source of hope.

Do have your fun. Don't forget to wash up before you eat because both
of you carry deadly germs according to the opposing idiot. But please
stop your mindless cross posting to alt.survival and
rec.crafts.metalworking. Both groups have their topics and neither
include letting brain dead children run loose yelling off topic
nonsense.

[Jeff M]

On 7/4/2013 4:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:06:43 -0500, Jeff M <NoS...@NoThanks.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Ray's a well known poster of lies,
>

> Oh, good. Another thread has deteriorated [snip]

Gee, sorry. Do you want some cheese to go with your whine? You do know
how to use your kill filter, don't you? I guess you also missed all the
times I explained and apologized for this ridiculousness, and encouraged
others who are annoyed by it to simply kill file us both, then?
Also, for the record, I let Ray run on for a very long time slandering
me before bothering to reply in any way. Later, I only began responding
in kind, and I never, ever initiate any of this nonsense. That's all on
Ray. If he stops stalking me online, I'll promptly stop replying in
kind. But since he's been at it for several years now, and is obviously
obsessed with me, I'm not holding my breath.

[Winston_Smith]

On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 17:05:27 -0500, Jeff M <NoS...@NoThanks.org>
wrote:

>On 7/4/2013 4:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:

The man who's address says no spam. Amusing.

>> Oh, good. Another thread has deteriorated [snip]
>

>You do know how to use your kill filter, don't you?

Why should we have to? Just because you want to act like a child?

>I guess you also missed all the
>times I explained and apologized for this ridiculousness, and encouraged
>others who are annoyed by it to simply kill file us both, then?

Why should we have to? Just because two of you want to act like a
children?

[Jeff M]

On 7/4/2013 5:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 17:05:27 -0500, Jeff M <NoS...@NoThanks.org>
> wrote:
>> On 7/4/2013 4:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>
> The man who's address says no spam. Amusing.
>
>>> Oh, good. Another thread has deteriorated [snip]
>>
>> You do know how to use your kill filter, don't you?
>
> Why should we have to?

Got a mouse in your pocket? What "we" are you whining about? Or have
you adopted the Royal we? As to why you should killfile me, don't you
recall complaining about the apparently enormous burden my forcing you
to read my posts, rather then simply clicking through them, imposed upon
you?

>> I guess you also missed all the
>> times I explained and apologized for this ridiculousness, and encouraged
>> others who are annoyed by it to simply kill file us both, then?
>
> Why should we have to? Just because two of you want to act like a
> children?

See above.
You do seem to spend an inordinate amount of time whining about what,
how and where other people post, but without ever considering you own
occasionally annoying posting habits, of course. So I take it that you
simply enjoy whining about others bothering you far too much to take the
one simple, surefire way to prevent those you're whining about from ever
bothering you again.

Your whining reminds me of the story of the little old lady who called
the town marshal to complain about teenagers skinny-dipping down at the
creek, because she could see them, naked as jaybirds, from her front
parlor window. This being a small country town, the marshal went down
to the creek and told the kids to move on down a bit, so as to not
bother the old lady. They did so, but awhile later, she called back,
complaining that she could still see them from her upstairs bedroom
window. Again, the marshal had the kids move down the creek, this time
making sure they were well out of view from the old lady's windows. He
was therefore rather taken aback when the old lady called a third time,
with the same complaint. He knew the kids had moved completely out of
sight of her windows. Puzzled, he asked her how she could possibly
still be bothered by those kids. Her reply? She could still see them,
from the small window in her attic, using binoculars.

[Winston_Smith]

On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 18:08:13 -0500, Jeff M wrote:
>On 7/4/2013 5:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:

>> On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 17:05:27 -0500, Jeff M wrote:
>>> On 7/4/2013 4:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>
>>>> Oh, good. Another thread has deteriorated [snip]
>>>
>>> You do know how to use your kill filter, don't you?
>>
>> Why should we have to?
>
>Got a mouse in your pocket? What "we" are you whining about? Or have
>you adopted the Royal we?

I see you are now reduced to rhetorical questions to make fun instead
of trying to present a reasonable explanation for your childish
behavior.

Rest of your bullshit snipped. It was repetitive and as childish as
your bogus attacks on Ray. (And his on you.) Go find yourselves a sand
box.

[Jeff M]

On 7/4/2013 10:19 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 18:08:13 -0500, Jeff M wrote:
>> On 7/4/2013 5:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>> On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 17:05:27 -0500, Jeff M wrote:
>>>> On 7/4/2013 4:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Oh, good. Another thread has deteriorated [snip]
>>>>
>>>> You do know how to use your kill filter, don't you?
>>>
>>> Why should we have to?

You sound like a petulant child.

>> Got a mouse in your pocket? What "we" are you whining about? Or have
>> you adopted the Royal we?
>
> I see you are now reduced to rhetorical questions to make fun instead
> of trying to present a reasonable explanation for your childish
> behavior.

I see you are now reduced to trying to avoid the truth about your own
childishly whiny behavior. You obviously have no rational explanation
of your ongoing whining and sniveling instead of doing the obvious and
mature adult thing here of simply killfiling or ignoring any posts you
don't want to read, or you'd have offered it by now, in response to my
repeated requests. Why is that?

So it appears to me that you're implicitly confirming what your own
posting history already shows: you simply enjoy bitching and moaning
about what, where and how other people post so much that you are
actually seeking out and reading posts that give you any excuse to do
so, instead of ignoring or killfiling them like normal people do.

In addition, you're now topping off that inexplicably juvenile behavior
by resorting to the inevitable loser's tactic of snipping from you reply
that very question which I've put to you. Why is that?

I suppose it's so you feel somehow justified in continuing your
senseless, childish whining instead of acting like a responsible adult.

You are behaving no differently than the little old lady in the attic
with the binoculars, and you know it. That's why you just had to snip
this out before replying to my previous post:

"You do seem to spend an inordinate amount of time whining about what,
how and where other people post, but without ever considering you own
occasionally annoying posting habits, of course. So I take it that you
simply enjoy whining about others bothering you far too much to take the
one simple, surefire way to prevent those you're whining about from ever
bothering you again.

Your whining reminds me of the story of the little old lady who called
the town marshal to complain about teenagers skinny-dipping down at the
creek, because she could see them, naked as jaybirds, from her front
parlor window. This being a small country town, the marshal went down
to the creek and told the kids to move on down a bit, so as to not
bother the old lady. They did so, but awhile later, she called back,
complaining that she could still see them from her upstairs bedroom
window. Again, the marshal had the kids move down the creek, this time
making sure they were well out of view from the old lady's windows. He
was therefore rather taken aback when the old lady called a third time,
with the same complaint. He knew the kids had moved completely out of
sight of her windows. Puzzled, he asked her how she could possibly
still be bothered by those kids. Her reply? She could still see them,
from the small window in her attic, using binoculars."

> Rest of your bullshit snipped. It was repetitive and as childish as
> your bogus attacks on Ray. (And his on you.) Go find yourselves a sand
> box.

Grow the frack up, you whiny little bitch.

[Winston_Smith]

On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 23:01:27 -0500, Jeff M <Spa...@Extrordinaire.org>
wrote:

>You sound like a petulant child.

Abused is more like it. You are the abuser.

>Grow the frack up, you whiny little bitch.

Right back at you. Why do you insist on your childish behavior of
spamming off-topic posts into groups that clearly don't want you.

Do you think you have a God given right to be offensive because you
are liberal? Do you think that helps people take you seriously as an
adult commentator on current issues?

Boy, you and Ray sure do make a matched pair of whacko bookends. It's
pretty hard to tell you children apart. Were you twins separated at
birth?

[Jeff M]

On 7/5/2013 4:17 PM, Winston_Smith, whiny brat, wrote:
>
>> You sound like a petulant child.
>
> Abused is more like it. You are the abuser.

HaHaHaHa!!! That's Keller-level stupid, and laughably ridiculous. I am
not your "abuser." If you need help killfiling me, just ask. I'm sure
there are plenty of folks here that will gladly help you. Then you no
longer need suffer the "abuse" of willingly and voluntarily choosing to
read my posts, despite my repeated suggestions that you simply killfile
me or at least ignore my posts.

Again, I was unmistakably correct about you. You do, indeed, simply
enjoy childishly bitching and moaning about what, where and how other
people post, now laughably inflated into "abuse," so much that you are

actually seeking out and reading posts that give you any excuse to do

so, instead of acting like an adult and simply ignoring, clicking
through or killfiling them like normal people do.

[John Q. Public]

Still fighting that disbarred lawyer thing? You just sink lower and lower.

[John Q. Public]

Maybe this is not the real Jeff. Comparing recent posts to those of 2006
and thereabouts this poster may be an imposter.

[Gunner Asch]

Jeff lost his law license in 2006 or 2007. And the drug abuse has
fucked with his head ever since.


--
""Almost all liberal behavioral tropes track the impotent rage of small
children. Thus, for example, there is also the popular tactic of
repeating some stupid, meaningless phrase a billion times" Arms for
hostages, arms for hostages, arms for hostages, it's just about sex, just
about sex, just about sex, dumb,dumb, money in politics,money in
politics, Enron, Enron, Enron. Nothing repeated with mind-numbing
frequency in all major news outlets will not be believed by some members
of the populace. It is the permanence of evil; you can't stop it." (Ann
Coulter)

[Gray Guest]

Jeff M <NoS...@NoThanks.org> wrote in
news:h4WdnWdu5tt5fkjM...@giganews.com:

Ya think a lawyer could read the fine print:

Notice DPS Cannot guarantee the records you obtain through this site
relate to the person about whom you are seeking information. Searches based
on names, dates of birth and other alphanumeric identifiers are not always
accurate. The only way to positively link someone to a criminal record is
through fingerprint verification.

If you aren't disbarred, you should be.

--
Refusenik #1

Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.

Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama

[Winston_Smith]

On Sun, 07 Jul 2013 00:01:11 -0400, "John Q. Public"
<J...@flashmail.com> wrote:

Could be. I don't know his old posts. Over my umpteen years on usenet
I've seen one person undergo a complete reversal in thinking, nym's
usurped, or just dropped by one poster and picked up later by another.
Many of them are fairly common, like mine, and in use by several
people but usually in completely different interest groups.

In any case, the current user of that nym is exhibiting childish
behavior. Such that it discredits any serious comment he makes on
current issues.

[Harold Burton]

In article <h4WdnWdu5tt5fkjM...@giganews.com>,

Jeff M <NoS...@NoThanks.org> wrote:

> On 6/19/2013 3:53 PM, Ray Keller wrote:
> >

> > Sen. Cruz blasts Obama with one Śblogger-grade sarcasmą question

> > <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3033174/posts>
> >
> > Anyone know if President Obama intends to perform background checks on
> > the Syrian rebels before providing them weapons?
>
>
> LOL
> Ray's a well known poster of lies, idiocy and semi-literate buffoonery,
> but his habit of gullibly re-posting the ignorant rantings and nonsense
> written for fools is even worse.

And your objection to performing background checks on people before
GIVING them arms, is?



Leftards, batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.

[Harold Burton]

In article <HemdnQp_dqA1bEjM...@giganews.com>,

Jeff M <NoS...@NoThanks.org> wrote:

> On 7/4/2013 4:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:06:43 -0500, Jeff M <NoS...@NoThanks.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Ray's a well known poster of lies,
> >
> > Oh, good. Another thread has deteriorated [snip]
>
> Gee, sorry. Do you want some cheese to go with your whine? You do know
> how to use your kill filter, don't you? I guess you also missed all the
> times I explained and apologized for this ridiculousness, and encouraged
> others who are annoyed by it to simply kill file us both, then?
> Also, for the record, I let Ray run on for a very long time slandering
> me before bothering to reply in any way. Later, I only began responding
> in kind, and I never, ever initiate any of this nonsense. That's all on
> Ray. If he stops stalking me online

You stalked him. He made a post having nothing to do with you, but it
was a pretty good zinger. . . and then you whined. Ray struck a nerve.

[Harold Burton]

In article <-rWdnajNb9eF2EvM...@giganews.com>,

Jeff M <NoS...@NoThanks.org> wrote:

> On 7/4/2013 10:19 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 18:08:13 -0500, Jeff M wrote:
> >> On 7/4/2013 5:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 17:05:27 -0500, Jeff M wrote:
> >>>> On 7/4/2013 4:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> Oh, good. Another thread has deteriorated [snip]
> >>>>
> >>>> You do know how to use your kill filter, don't you?
> >>>
> >>> Why should we have to?
>
> You sound like a petulant child.

You're projecting.


snicker

[Harold Burton]

In article <h0qbt81v9cm9f9m11...@4ax.com>,

Winston_Smith <inv...@butterfly.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:06:43 -0500, Jeff M <NoS...@NoThanks.org>
> wrote:
>
> >Ray's a well known poster of lies,
>
> Oh, good. Another thread has deteriorated to the point where a brain
> dead, right extremist and a brain dead left extremist have resumed
> their years old pissing contest. Don't be frightened folks. They are
> harmless because they are both totally ineffective and unbelievable.
> This happens every month or so, but does nothing except bore those of
> us with an IQ over 20. That's pretty much everyone except Ray and
> Jeff.

Except Ray's zinger was pretty funny and had a certain element of
relevance to it.

[Harold Burton]

In article <WSowt.20581$5w3....@newsfe03.iad>,
"Ray Keller" <Left...@re.desperate.com> wrote:

> Sen. Cruz blasts Obama with one 'blogger-grade sarcasm' question

> Anyone know if President Obama intends to perform background checks on the
> Syrian rebels before providing them weapons?

Clearly not, since the weapons seem to keep ending up in the hands of
pro-Assad militias.


<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/07/10/us-weapons-syria-shi
ites/2503953/>


Just one more screw-up by the community organizer who's in waaaaaaay
over his head.


snicker

[Stormin Mormon]

I believe B. Hussein is pushing an agenda.
He's not over his head, he's going in the
direction he wanted all along.
.
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
.
"Harold Burton" <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hal.i.burton-CE7C...@unknown-98-136-209-x.yahoo.com...

Clearly not, since the weapons seem to keep ending up in the hands of
pro-Assad militias.

[Jeff M]

On 7/12/2013 6:42 AM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
> I believe B. Hussein is pushing an agenda.

[snip]

Isn't that what all politicians do, and what those who voted them in
expect them to do?

[Winston_Smith]

Not if they are from what Stomin' thinks of as the evil other party.
When Bush did it, he thought it was fine, but times change in his
little world. Clinton of course was evil. See how Stormin' works. As
predictable as ants on a sugar spill. And just about as bright.

[Jeff M]

Some people lack the knack for objectivity, or the ability to see things
as others seem them. That is proven every day, right here.

[Harold Burton]

In article <rdc1u8pfajaq588ck...@4ax.com>,

Just like so many on the left. The Patriot Act was an abomination until
Obama endorsed and expanded it. ;-)

[Winston_Smith]

You are absolutely correct. I commented on Stormin' who is a whacko
right wing nut. We have an equal number of whacko left wing nuts too.

Personally, I fail to see how anyone can see one party as always
correct and the other always wrong. I'll give both 10% right, 10% got
part of it right, 10% well meaning but screwed up, and 70% hot
stinkin' BS.

---
If the whacko right and the whacko left both
think I'm on the other side, I must be somewhere
near the rational middle.

From: Shall not be infringed
<hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com>
Message-ID:
<92e3a5bf-551c-41da...@googlegroups.com>
You're as partisan as they come, and shriller than most,
except for maybe Tool.

From: Too_Many_Tools
<too_man...@yahoo.com>
Message-ID:
<673265aa-5a19-4a73...@n4g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
You always stick up for the Republicans and
dump on the Democrats. Your colors are known.
TMT

[Harold Burton]

In article <2im3u89herm71rpvp...@4ax.com>,

Winston_Smith <inv...@butterfly.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:32:22 -0400, Harold Burton wrote:
> > Winston_Smith <inv...@butterfly.net> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:41:02 -0500, Jeff M wrote:
> >> >On 7/12/2013 6:42 AM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
> >>
> >> >> I believe B. Hussein is pushing an agenda.
> >> >[snip]
> >> >
> >> >Isn't that what all politicians do, and what those who voted them in
> >> >expect them to do?
> >>
> >> Not if they are from what Stomin' thinks of as the evil other party.
> >> When Bush did it, he thought it was fine, but times change in his
> >> little world. Clinton of course was evil. See how Stormin' works. As
> >> predictable as ants on a sugar spill. And just about as bright.
> >
> >Just like so many on the left. The Patriot Act was an abomination until
> >Obama endorsed and expanded it. ;-)
>
> You are absolutely correct. I commented on Stormin' who is a whacko
> right wing nut. We have an equal number of whacko left wing nuts too.
>
> Personally, I fail to see how anyone can see one party as always
> correct and the other always wrong. I'll give both 10% right, 10% got
> part of it right, 10% well meaning but screwed up, and 70% hot
> stinkin' BS.

True, but while I've never seen a right winger claim that all
conservatives are good and all liberals are bad, I've seen the opposite.

[Winston_Smith]

On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:01:46 -0400, Harold Burton wrote:
> Winston_Smith wrote:

>> Personally, I fail to see how anyone can see one party as always
>> correct and the other always wrong. I'll give both 10% right, 10% got
>> part of it right, 10% well meaning but screwed up, and 70% hot
>> stinkin' BS.
>
>True, but while I've never seen a right winger claim that all
>conservatives are good and all liberals are bad, I've seen the opposite.

Remember back to the early days of Bush attacking the wrong country
(Iraq) because they were mean to his daddy and Saddam flew one of the
jets on 9-11.

Anyone that pointed out facts that didn't fit (such as me) or opposed
the war on other grounds (such as me) was asked "why do you hate
America". The Bushites even intimidated the Dems in Congress to go
along for fear of being smeared.

Congress managed to rename French fries in their cafeteria "Freedom
Fries", weakly echoing the WW1 conversion of sauerkraut to "Liberty
Cabbage". Even Hamburgers were renamed "ground sirloin" which is still
with us because it fools dumb consumers.

Bush copied the world wars rhetoric a lot, like the Axis of ... bit. A
pathetic call to patriotism to an elective war that didn't merit any.
Support the soldiers, yes, but not the fools that send them off to get
killed for politics.

[Harold Burton]

In article <8cg9u8lprqbhs5n0f...@4ax.com>,

Winston_Smith <inv...@butterfly.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:01:46 -0400, Harold Burton wrote:
> > Winston_Smith wrote:
>
> >> Personally, I fail to see how anyone can see one party as always
> >> correct and the other always wrong. I'll give both 10% right, 10% got
> >> part of it right, 10% well meaning but screwed up, and 70% hot
> >> stinkin' BS.
> >
> >True, but while I've never seen a right winger claim that all
> >conservatives are good and all liberals are bad, I've seen the opposite.
>
> Remember back to the early days of Bush attacking the wrong country

I remember lots of presidents attacking (or provoking attacks from/on)
the wrong country.

> (Iraq) because they were mean to his daddy and Saddam flew one of the
> jets on 9-11.
>
> Anyone that pointed out facts that didn't fit (such as me) or opposed
> the war on other grounds (such as me) was asked "why do you hate
> America".

That's OK, lots of leftards asked the same question.

> The Bushites even intimidated the Dems in Congress to go
> along for fear of being smeared.

That's lame, unless you're claiming Democrats in Congress have no spine.
OK, you may have something there. :-)

> Congress managed to rename French fries in their cafeteria "Freedom
> Fries", weakly echoing the WW1 conversion of sauerkraut to "Liberty
> Cabbage".

Hardly weakly, just stupidly, as was the original renaming.

> Even Hamburgers were renamed "ground sirloin" which is still
> with us because it fools dumb consumers.

Actually I remember that in the 50s, but not lately, except at the meat
counter, but that doesn't really count since it makes sense for raw
meat, just not for a hamburger, which are now called "hamburgers"

> Bush copied the world wars rhetoric a lot, like the Axis of ... bit. A
> pathetic call to patriotism to an elective war that didn't merit any.
> Support the soldiers, yes, but not the fools that send them off to get
> killed for politics.

Yep, pretty much the same as every other stupid war we got sucked into
by lying politicians and that would include WWI, WWII, the Korean War
(oops, Police action), and Vietnam. What's the only difference? Iraq
cost us about an order of magnitude or more less dead than the others.

[Gunner Asch]

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 22:07:46 -0400, Harold Burton
<hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote:

>>
>> Anyone that pointed out facts that didn't fit (such as me) or opposed
>> the war on other grounds (such as me) was asked "why do you hate
>> America".
>
>That's OK, lots of leftards asked the same question.
>

Oddly enough..the Leftards avoid answering nearly universally.

Funny about that eh wot?

[Winston_Smith]

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 22:07:46 -0400, Harold Burton wrote:
> Winston_Smith wrote:
>
>> Even Hamburgers were renamed "ground sirloin" which is still
>> with us because it fools dumb consumers.
>
>Actually I remember that in the 50s, but not lately, except at the meat
>counter, but that doesn't really count since it makes sense for raw
>meat, just not for a hamburger, which are now called "hamburgers"

It's probably a regional thing. In many restaurants - starting one cut
above McD - the menu says ground sirloin or chopped sirloin. Makes it
sound a bit more classy, implies better meat (it's not), and justifies
a buck or two more on the price.

[Scout]

"Winston_Smith" <inv...@butterfly.net> wrote in message
news:mpfdu8l0trgjbqgc7...@4ax.com...

Actually, I have to disagree.

Ground or chopped sirloin refers to a particular cut of meat which generally
is better meat (ie the sirloin).

If they aren't using the sirloin then it's false advertising.

Same thing for ground round. That refers to a particular cut (and location)
of meat that was used.

If the meat doesn't come from the round (ie rump) then it's false
advertising.

Of course, proving that could be difficult without access to the meat
processer.

[Harold Burton]

In article <ks7flo$t7u$1...@dont-email.me>,

You should be so lucky. Round tastes like liver.

[Harold Burton]

In article <mpfdu8l0trgjbqgc7...@4ax.com>,

Best hamburger is a mixture of sirloin and shoulder, also called chuck.
or chuck eye.