Re: 9/11 was an inside job.
*us*
bombs going off, all over in the buildings."
http://www.911sharethetruth.com/
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:55:40 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>...I am afraid of reality.
No one had asked about you, though.
It's your satanic masters who should be brought to justice.
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:34:31 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>...running away like a crying
>baby girl ...
You do that because you're afraid of reality.
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:30:17 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>...you read ...
Why can't you?
Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.
"A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy
for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in
cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one nation the enmities of
the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter
without justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges
denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by
unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy,
ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are
withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens who devote themselves
to the favorite nation, facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own
country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a
virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable
zeal for public good, the foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation."
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread121869/pg1
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:28:27 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... nutbag physically impossible theories...
You've swallowed all those offered you by your
master Cheney.
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:16:30 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... playing the useful idiot ...
You sure are.
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>...subservient...
You're doing just what your neocon masters want you to do.
http://www.stewwebb.com/9-11WTCBushCheneyTreason.html
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:53:25 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... rightard...
>... delusional rightard fuckwad.
>...being the useful idiot ...
No one had asked about you.
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... rightard ...
No one had asked for you.
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:22:07 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... still can't comprehend ...full of shit.
Of course you have those problems.
You're too weak and fearful to consider reality.
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:43:09 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>delusional kkkooker world view.
You can't comprehend that Bush and Cheney are
still profiting from 9/11.
"The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its
enemies attack it.
"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to
have been planned by people for personal reasons..."
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/
Bush and Cheney certainly have personal reasons for wanting the
crimes of 9/11 to occur. They did all they could to make sure
the crimes would happen, and they're the primary beneficiaries.
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... He's admitted it...
You're easily duped by faked video.
There's also the way Bush hustled the bin Ladens out of the USA.
He'd forced the FBI to stop investigating them when he took office.
http://tvnewslies.org/html/bin_laden_ties.html
Bush also made sure that the pilots were disarmed, in July of 2001.
Bush and Cheney are still making money on 9/11.
They're the primary beneficiaries of the crime PNAC wanted.
Even their most subservient pawn can't deny it.
*us*
http://www.rense.com/general68/mreproof.htm
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:56:44 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... I am afraid of reality.
You'd already made that obvious, but it's not about you.
It's about the victims/survivors of 9/11.
They deserve justice, no matter how much you hate them.
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:35:59 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... the BushCo worshiper. FACT. ... shill for the criminal ...
You do that because you're afraid of reality.
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:39:37 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... the Buch...
The what?
*us*
can't dispute what those in the know have to say.
*us*
Notice that even the most desperate neocon pawn
can't dispute what the witnesses reported.
*us*
>... a neocon... I ...
You don't seem to understand that your war criminal
idols wouldn't hesitate to murder Americans for their
fun and profit.
See also: "Operation Northwoods".
Notice that even the most desperate neocon pawn
can't dispute what the witnesses reported.
"Witnesses To WTC Explosives"
*us*
murdered on 9/11.
*us*
> I am impotent with rage against the 9/11 victims.
Otherwise you'd not call them liars.
*us*
family history that'd make him hesitate to commit
murderous treason against the United States.
*us*
and his father was involved in Iran-Contra, among many
other things.
There is nothing whatsoever in Bush's personal or
family history that'd make him hesitate to commit
murderous treason against the United States.
http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html
*us*
*us*
>... we can have more laughs at
You're laughing at the 9/11 victims when you don't
mind at all that the real perpetrators get away with it.
knews4...@yahoo.com
> "Firefighters and rescue workers talked about explosives and
> bombs going off, all over in the buildings."
>
> http://www.911sharethetruth.com/
> Even their most subservient pawn can't deny it.
http://rense.com/general88/back.htm
"The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11
was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely
untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in
a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11
Commission.
Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney
General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original
flawed 9/11 report.
Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the
Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that
the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD?
Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this?
Yes.
Farmer states"at some level of the government, at some point in
timethere was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened I
was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was
described . The [NORAD air defense] tapes told a radically different
story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This
is not spin."
The 9/11 Commission head, Thomas Kean, was the Republican governor of
New Jersey. He had the following to say "We to this day don't know why
NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told
us, it was just so far from the truth. . . " When Bush's own
handpicked commission failed to go along with the cover up and
requested a criminal investigation, why was nothing done?
9/11 Commission member and former US Senator, Bob Kerrey, says, "No
one is more qualified to write the definitive book about the tragedy
of 9/11 than John Farmer. Fortunately, he has done so. Even more
fortunately the language is clear, alive and instructive for anyone
who wants to make certain this never happens again.""(4)
Al Dykes
<knews4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 21, 8:11=A0am, * US * wrote:
>> "Firefighters and rescue workers talked about explosives and
>> bombs going off, all over in the buildings."
>>
>> http://www.911sharethetruth.com/
><economy snip>
>> Even their most subservient pawn can't deny it.
>
>http://rense.com/general88/back.htm
>
>"The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11
>was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely
>untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in
>a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11
>Commission.
>
>Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney
>General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original
>flawed 9/11 report.
You should never cite a book you haven't read.
In his book, Farmer says that in-spite of the fact that some people
tried to hide information, the conclusions of the 9/11 Commission are
accurate.
--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
knews4...@yahoo.com
> In article <38935c89-1cf3-446d-af1c-2a25c7e69...@2g2000prl.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> <knews4u2c...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Oct 21, 8:11=A0am, * US * wrote:
> >> "Firefighters and rescue workers talked about explosives and
> >> bombs going off, all over in the buildings."
>
> >>http://www.911sharethetruth.com/
> ><economy snip>
> >> Even their most subservient pawn can't deny it.
>
> >http://rense.com/general88/back.htm
>
> >"The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11
> >was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely
> >untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in
> >a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11
> >Commission.
>
> >Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney
> >General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original
> >flawed 9/11 report.
>
> You should never cite a book you haven't read.
>
> In his book, Farmer says that in-spite of the fact that some people
> tried to hide information, the conclusions of the 9/11 Commission are
> accurate.
>
> --
> Al Dykes
Liar.
Accuracy based on lies is not accurate.
You spooks will never give up with your "doubledspeak."
Al Dykes
<knews4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 29, 12:56=A0pm, ady...@panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>> In article <38935c89-1cf3-446d-af1c-2a25c7e69...@2g2000prl.googlegroups.c=
>om>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> =A0<knews4u2c...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >On Oct 21, 8:11=3DA0am, * US * wrote:
>> >> "Firefighters and rescue workers talked about explosives and
>> >> bombs going off, all over in the buildings."
>>
>> >>http://www.911sharethetruth.com/
>> ><economy snip>
>> >> Even their most subservient pawn can't deny it.
>>
>> >http://rense.com/general88/back.htm
>>
>> >"The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11
>> >was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely
>> >untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in
>> >a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11
>> >Commission.
>>
>> >Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney
>> >General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original
>> >flawed 9/11 report.
>>
>>
>> In his book, Farmer says that in-spite of the fact that some people
>> tried to hide information, the conclusions of the 9/11 Commission are
>> accurate.
>>
>> --
>> Al Dykes
>
>
>Liar.
In his book, Farmer says that in-spite of the fact that some people
tried to hide information, the conclusions of the 9/11 Commission are
accurate.
--
Al Dykes
knews4...@yahoo.com
> In article <edb4a49f-294a-4d4b-952e-df26edfed...@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
Keep up the good work, Spook.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie
Iarnrod
You just described the KKKooker Twoofer movement in a "nut"shell,
knowsknothing!!
You morons start with lies and then make up delusions to support them!
FACT!
knews4...@yahoo.com
> On Oct 29, 2:02 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
Iarnrod
Are you unaware that nothing in your kooklink actually supports any of
your insane delusions, knowsknothing?
All you have is arm-waving denial and childlike incredulity at basic
science.
*us*
>... master Cheeeeeeney ...
Cry out for your satanic idol when you have nothing else.
*us*
*us*
>... started crying...
Well, you can't dispute the contents in the "peer-reviewed
"Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal", and you're too
weak to deal with reality.
*us*
http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:59:13 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... a dope and a shill for the criminal
>Bush
No one had asked about you.
*us*
>...Hate... US ...I'm too
> weak to deal with reality.
> I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.
No one had asked about you, though.
"over 50 senior military, intelligence, and government officials and over
100 respected professors who seriously question the 9/11 official story"
*us*
revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event � like a new Pearl Harbor..."
http://www.terraknowledge.net/news/terrak040503a.htm
*us*
that PNAC wanted that attack on 9/11.
*us*
than Bush and Cheney.
pyotr filipivich
If it was, you wouldn't be signaling to Them, that you know.
Because if it really was an inside job, someone would be round to
wrap up a few loose ends.
OTOH, those who are claiming it is an inside job, could be part of
the conspiracy, just part of the disinformation campaign to cover up.
pyotr
-
pyotr filipivich
"If 9/11 was really an inside job, you wouldn't be driving around
with a bumper sticker bragging that you were on to it." Mark Steyn, Oct 27, 2007
*us*
The most fervent neocon pawn will merely spew
fallacious invective rather than consider the facts.
*us*
> ...I'm too
> weak to deal with reality.
> I cry out for my satanic idol Cheeeeeney when I have nothing else.
>Yep.
You're not the subject.
" 1. Means - Dick Cheney and the Secret Service: Dick Cheney was running a completely
separate chain of Command & Control via the Secret Service, assuring the paralysis of Air
Force response on 9/11. The Secret Service has the technology to see the same radar
screens the FAA sees in real time. They also have the legal authority and technological
capability to take supreme command in cases of national emergency. Dick Cheney was the
acting Commander in Chief on 9/11. (Click here for a summary of these points)
2. Motive - Peak Oil: At some point between 2000 and 2007, world oil production reaches
its peak; from that point on, every barrel of oil is going to be harder to find, more
expensive to recover, and more valuable to those who recover and control it. Dick Cheney
was well aware of the coming Peak Oil crisis at least as early as 1999, and 9/11 provided
the pretext for the series of energy wars that Cheney stated, "will not end in our
lifetime." (Click here for a summary of these points)
3. Opportunity - 9/11 War Games: The Air Force was running multiple war games on the
morning of 9/11 simulating hijackings over the continental United States that included (at
least) one "live-fly" exercise as well as simulations that placed "false blips" on FAA
radar screens. These war games eerily mirrored the real events of 9/11 to the point of the
Air Force running drills involving hijacked aircraft as the 9/11 plot actually unfolded.
The war games & terror drills played a critical role in ensuring no Air Force fighter
jocks - who had trained their entire lives for this moment - would be able to prevent the
attacks from succeeding. These exercises were under Dick Cheney's management. (Click here
for a summary of these points)"
*us*
Bill Benton
> Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.
How about dealing with this:
http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Myths
http://www.answers.com/topic/debunking-9-11-myths
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.slate.com/id/2088092/
http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/158816635X
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fahrenheit-2777
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/04/19/cstillwell.DTL
http://www.2spare.com/item_43133.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory
9/11 TRUTHERS GUT PUNCHED BY HISTORY CHANNEL
In what will surely be seen as a defining moment for the 9/11 truther
movement, the History Channel has delivered a blow for sanity and
rationalism by airing a superior documentary entitled 9/11
Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction.
There's no other way to say it; the truthers got reamed.
They got reamed to the point that the truthers who produced the
internet video Loose Change are scrambling to alter the third version
of their conspiracy mongering tripe, even going so far as to drop any
reference to the twin towers being blown up by the government (they
continue to insist WTC #7 was brought down by explosives).
The documentary took no prisoners as it destroyed almost all of the
major conspiracy theories associated with 9/11 while revealing the
real motivations of the truthers; that they are part of a political
movement driven by raw, unreasoning hatred of George Bush, the
American government, and to some extent, America itself.
Prominently featured were historians like David Brinkley, Editor in
Chief of Popular Mechanics James Meigs, and structural engineers,
explosives experts, and a host of scientists, military experts, and
eyewitnesses to the disaster. The cumulative effect of the testimony
of the anti-conspiracists was absolutely devastating. The show left
little doubt of the unhinged nature of the truthers, showing many of
them - including radio host Alex Jones who has given vast amounts of
air time to every kook, crazy, and nutcase with a theory on 9/11 -
looking like the anti-intellectual fruitcakes they truly are.
The format was perfect. A truther would lay out a conspiracy theory
which was then immediately debunked by 2 or 3 experts. Over two hours,
a couple of dozen myths associated with 9/11 were laid to rest
permanently including the "missile" that hit the Pentagon, the shoot
down of Flight 93, the "implosion" of the towers," and other theories
not based on fact.
The implosion theory was debunked several times over. First, by the
best forensic structural engineer in the country who, with the help of
some excellent graphics and animation, showed exactly how the planes
caused the towers to fall. An explosives expert (a young guy who was
flabbergasted at the ignorance of the truthers regarding demolition)
pointed out it would have taken weeks to rig the buildings for
implosion and would have involved stripping drywall and ripping out
walls. The nail in the coffin was supplied by one of the engineers who
prepared the final report (working for the independent American
Society of Civil Engineers) who showed how the collapse of the towers
accounted for such things as the puffs of smoke seen in lower floors
as the collapse was occurring as well as the speed of the collapse.
By the end of their presentation, I was on my feet cheering.
The emotional highlight of the documentary occurred when they had
members of the victims families responding to the truthers. A
confrontation at Ground Zero on the anniversary of 9/11 with the
truthers screaming at family members who disagreed with them was
shocking. One family member said every time she heard one of the
conspiracy nuts it was like "a stab in the heart."
Not that these nutcases care much. As the documentary showed, the
truthers real goal is to blame Bush. And the disturbing poll numbers
showing that 46% of the country believing the whole truth about 9/11
is being hidden by the government shows why this documentary should be
viewed by everyone.
You can tell how deeply this program hurt the truther movement by the
fact that they didn't try to answer any of the points made by the
piece but rather attacked the source:
An upcoming documentary entitled The 9/11 Conspiracies, to be
aired on the History Channel, may represent the biggest hit piece to
date on the 9/11 truth movement and is rife with bias, cronyism and
conflicts of interest
The so-called documentary promises not to look at the flaws in the
official story from a neutral perspective but to start out by
suggesting that any deviation from the official line is "outrageous".
The program also features so called independent "experts" who are
actually in the employ of the program makers themselves who in turn
rely on scores of multi-million dollar contracts with the government
and the military-industrial complex.
Hit piece? It is hard to see how much more fair minded the History
Channel could have been. They allowed the truthers to spout their
conspiracy theories to their hearts content and then rationally,
reasonably, calmly poked so many holes in them they resembled a piece
of swiss cheese.
Pat Curley of the excellent truther debunking site Screw Loose Change
called the documentary "the dream debunking piece. It's Hiroshima for
the Truthers." One might throw in Nagasaki as well.
Pat concludes:
Overall: Devastating blow for most of the kooks; ironically the
CIT nuts get a little thrill as their theory at least gets a little
boost. The cumulative effect is pretty overwhelming. The voicemorphed
calls thing gets smashed in their faces. Awesome, absolutely the most
satisfying moment in a very satisfying two hours!
He is referring to the jaw dropping theory that all the communications
from passengers on the doomed planes were faked! Family members
tearfully rebutted those outrageous charges. And the young editor of
Popular Mechanics, who tried very hard not to laugh when he was
debunking some of the more unbelievable theories, actually said he was
personally disgusted by the implication that family members were
somehow involved in the conspiracy by covering up the fact that the
phone calls were not really from their loved ones.
knews4...@yahoo.com
> "* US *" wrote in message:
> > Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.
>
> How about dealing with this:
>
Illuminati Disinfo sites?
By following the money and common sense.
Buildings do not collapse into themselves while turning to micron
sized dust and launch steel beams weighing tons hundreds of feet
laterally.
Crime scenes are not scrubbed asap to cover up the truth unless there
is something to hide.
All building destruction/fires are investigated for incendiaries BY
LAW but NOT IN THIS CASE.
Why?
Al Dykes
<knews4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Everything you've been told about WTC is wrong.
Iarnrod
Because your tin foil hat is not tight enough, lying rightard kkkook.
AllYou!
news:30dbf0bb-51de-4831...@12g2000pri.googlegroups.com,
knews4...@yahoo.com <knews4...@yahoo.com> mused:
> On Nov 4, 11:17 am, "Bill Benton" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>> "* US *" wrote in message:
>>> Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.
>>
>> How about dealing with this:
>>
> Yes, how does one deal wth the CIA, Mossad/Zionist, Bankster,
> Illuminati Disinfo sites?
>
> By following the money and common sense.
> Buildings do not collapse into themselves while turning to micron
> sized dust and launch steel beams weighing tons hundreds of feet
> laterally.
The buildings were either turned into mircon sized dust, or melted,
or broke apart into beams that weighed tons. Which is it?
knews4...@yahoo.com
> In article <30dbf0bb-51de-4831-a8b9-500e89d89...@12g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> <knews4u2c...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 4, 11:17=A0am, "Bill Benton" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> >> "* US *" wrote in message:
> >> > Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.
>
> >> How about dealing with this:
>
> >Yes, how does one deal wth the CIA, Mossad/Zionist, Bankster,
> >Illuminati Disinfo sites?
>
> >By following the money and common sense.
> >Buildings do not collapse into themselves while turning to micron
> >sized dust and launch steel beams weighing tons hundreds of feet
> >laterally.
> >Crime scenes are not scrubbed asap to cover up the truth unless there
> >is something to hide.
> >All building destruction/fires are investigated for incendiaries BY
> >LAW but NOT IN THIS CASE.
> >Why?
>
> Everything you've been told about WTC is wrong.
>
That is why we know the government is lying and the buildings were
demolished to start more wars for oil and Empire.
knews4...@yahoo.com
> Innews:30dbf0bb-51de-4831...@12g2000pri.googlegroups.com,
> knews4u2c...@yahoo.com <knews4u2c...@yahoo.com> mused:
>
> > On Nov 4, 11:17 am, "Bill Benton" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> >> "* US *" wrote in message:
> >>> Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.
>
> >> How about dealing with this:
>
> > Yes, how does one deal wth the CIA, Mossad/Zionist, Bankster,
> > Illuminati Disinfo sites?
>
> > By following the money and common sense.
> > Buildings do not collapse into themselves while turning to micron
> > sized dust and launch steel beams weighing tons hundreds of feet
> > laterally.
>
> The buildings were either turned into mircon sized dust, or melted,
> or broke apart into beams that weighed tons. Which is it?
>
Some of each happened to the building contents and materials.
One does not exlude the other.
Look at the photos.
Quit working for the CIA/Mossad.
>
>
> > Crime scenes are not scrubbed asap to cover up the truth unless
> > there is something to hide.
> > All building destruction/fires are investigated for incendiaries
> > BY LAW but NOT IN THIS CASE.
> > Why?
>
Still no answer to why the law was not followed?
AllYou!
news:ad1a5bac-0a71-4d61...@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com,
knews4...@yahoo.com <knews4...@yahoo.com> mused:
> On Nov 5, 4:24 am, "AllYou!" <ida...@conversent.net> wrote:
>> Innews:30dbf0bb-51de-4831...@12g2000pri.googlegroups.com,
>> knews4u2c...@yahoo.com <knews4u2c...@yahoo.com> mused:
>>
>>> On Nov 4, 11:17 am, "Bill Benton" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>>> "* US *" wrote in message:
>>>>> Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.
>>
>>>> How about dealing with this:
>>
>>> Yes, how does one deal wth the CIA, Mossad/Zionist, Bankster,
>>> Illuminati Disinfo sites?
>>
>>> By following the money and common sense.
>>> Buildings do not collapse into themselves while turning to
>>> micron sized dust and launch steel beams weighing tons
>>> hundreds of feet laterally.
>>
>> The buildings were either turned into mircon sized dust, or
>> melted, or broke apart into beams that weighed tons. Which is
>> it?
>>
> All the above.
> Some of each happened to the building contents and materials.
> One does not exlude the other.
> Look at the photos.
Except for the wild-ass claim that there was general melting of the
steel, I'm not aware that anyone disagrees with the rest of it. So
what's your point?
>>> Crime scenes are not scrubbed asap to cover up the truth unless
>>> there is something to hide.
>>> All building destruction/fires are investigated for
>>> incendiaries BY LAW but NOT IN THIS CASE.
>>> Why?
>>
>
> Still no answer to why the law was not followed?
Nothing was scrubbed clean any sooner than would be consistent with
normal investigations. You do know, right, that the first priority
was to see if there were any survivors in the rubble?
knews4...@yahoo.com
> Innews:ad1a5bac-0a71-4d61...@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com,
>
Yea, until they got the gold out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaCYEEO-58I
Your USAma "conspiracy theory" has more holes in it than Swiss Chees.
Quit your job at the Mossadd/CIA before the hordes with pitchforks
come and get your lying ass.
Al Dykes
<knews4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Nov 4, 8:39=A0pm, ady...@panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>> In article <30dbf0bb-51de-4831-a8b9-500e89d89...@12g2000pri.googlegroups.=
>com>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> =A0<knews4u2c...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >On Nov 4, 11:17=3DA0am, "Bill Benton" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>> >> "* US *" wrote in message:
>> >> > Notice how the bushworshipper can't deal with a word of this.
>>
>> >> How about dealing with this:
>>
>> >Yes, how does one deal wth the CIA, Mossad/Zionist, Bankster,
>> >Illuminati Disinfo sites?
>>
>> >By following the money and common sense.
>> >Buildings do not collapse into themselves while turning to micron
>> >sized dust and launch steel beams weighing tons hundreds of feet
>> >laterally.
>> >Crime scenes are not scrubbed asap to cover up the truth unless there
>> >is something to hide.
>> >All building destruction/fires are investigated for incendiaries BY
>> >LAW but NOT IN THIS CASE.
>> >Why?
>>
>> Everything you've been told about WTC is wrong.
>>
>Right.
>That is why we know the government is lying and the buildings were
>demolished to start more wars for oil and Empire.
Everything you've been told about WTC is wrong.
Strabo
Take a thousand pound steel safe with 3 inch thick walls designed
to withstand sustained fire and explosives. Drop it to the ground
from 1000 feet. It will be intact.
There were such safes in the WTC. Did any survive? What could cause
such a safe to disintegrate?
Dan
INCLUDING all the conspiracy/inside-job statements?!?
Damn...
Dan
knews4...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yes.
Including the lie that there were no explosions prior to the
collapses.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_A9X_8flGeM
And no "molten steel."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcqf5tL887o&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SLIzSCt_cg&feature=related
Like he says, "Watch the video."
knews4...@yahoo.com
> AllYou! wrote:
> > In
> >news:ad1a5bac-0a71-4d61...@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com,
>
> - Show quoted text -
And thanks to the internet "Dead men do tell their story."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQY-ksiuwKU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8LivSW9zLg&feature=related
AllYou!
news:f6b8bde7-0c16-4200...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com,
knews4...@yahoo.com <knews4...@yahoo.com> mused:
Yeah, that's it exactly.
AllYou!
Strabo <str...@flashlight.net> mused:
Prove it.
> Did any survive? What could
> cause such a safe to disintegrate?
Prove that any did.
*us*
and line of reasoning"
*us*
>It is hard to believe, given the level of info in the intelligence
>community, that someone did not know 911 was coming and chose to turn a
>blind eye. Swiss financial analysis of the trading in the days before
>9/11/01 also reveal enuf statistical analysis to prove beyond a
>reasonable doubt in any court proceeding that others knew as well.
Exactly. It became obvious that they knew in advance.
Bush and Cheney also lied about 9/11.
>This is not to say that many in the Bush administration were too stupid
>or too far out of the loop to have a clue, including Bush & Cheney. But
>since the Huey P. Long school of government rules apply-
>1- Never say anything in writing, much less email.
>2- Never say over the phone what can be said in person.
>3- never speak when you can nod.
>4. never nod when you can smile.
>
>And undoubtedly, there were those who knew what was coming that also
>knew high Bush administration officials would smile. There was no need
>for them to know.
Yet they did know. They had their lies all ready.
>But more to the point after all this, and hundreds of other threads as
>well, that nothing will be done by the powers that be unless there is a
>need for scapegoats to distract the public mind from other crises. What
>we here come to know will not have any effect, so the passion and
>zealotry in these threads is only an expression of ego.
History will not approve of those who let it slide.
*us*
><ROTFL>
To you, the deaths on 9/11 are funny.
To others, they're not.
>freaks still around ...
Nobody had asked for you.
Meanwhile:
knews4...@yahoo.com
> Innews:f6b8bde7-0c16-4200...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com,
> knews4u2c...@yahoo.com <knews4u2c...@yahoo.com> mused:
Glad you agree.
And I'll replace your loser snippage.
AllYou!
news:70924d61-8c08-40b6...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com,
knews4...@yahoo.com <knews4...@yahoo.com> mused:
Why didn't all gthe gold melt to flow like lava?
Strabo
Because it was in a vault below ground.
AllYou!
Strabo <str...@flashlight.net> mused:
You mean below ground where, apparently some people claim that other
people claim that molten stell was flowiing lie lava for days and
weeks?
*us*
understand the scientific bases:
*us*
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm
Iarnrod
> "undeniable facts, events, and quotes"
So why do you deny the facts, rightard Bush-serving shill? Why do you
continue to promote physically impossible fantasies that help Bush?
knews4...@yahoo.com
How is it someone exposing the 9-11 lies is supporting Bush?
Because you are a lost and twisted agent of lies and distraction.
You are the one denying facts.
You are blind to the truth or do not want it known.
No one could possibly twist what other people say unless you are lost
or are doing it on purpose.
Harold Burton
<27fd0550-b3a4-486d...@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
knews4...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Nov 7, 4:52�pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 5:29�pm, * US * wrote:
> >
> > > "undeniable facts, events, and quotes"
> >
> > So why do you deny the facts, rightard Bush-serving shill? Why do you
> > continue to promote physically impossible fantasies that help Bush?
>
> How is it someone exposing the 9-11 lies is supporting Bush?
that, plus * US * is a leftard.
Iarnrod
> On Nov 7, 4:52 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 7, 5:29 pm, * US * wrote:
>
> > > "undeniable facts, events, and quotes"
>
> > So why do you deny the facts, rightard Bush-serving shill? Why do you
> > continue to promote physically impossible fantasies that help Bush?
>
> How is it someone exposing the 9-11 lies is supporting Bush?
You idiot, he is not "exposing lies," he is acting as a counter-
disinfo shill by proposing ludicrous "theories" of such ridiculous
physical impossibility lengths -- things already conclusively proven
to be false, like controlled demolition or gravity defying "thermite"
-- that it tainted legitimate opposition to the criminal Bush-
Cheeeeeeeeney regime. It painted all of those working for peace and
justice as being like you idiots, believing in shit that couldn't
possibly have happened and which have been proven not to have
happened. This moron, for instance, is pointing to steel columns cut
at 45 degree angles like it's some conspiracy, when in fact the
columns were cut during the debris clean up. This is just a FACT and
actually, the photo he posted came from a video that, if he had
watched it, would show other workers with torches cutting other
columns in the same manner.
You liars lie so blatantly you don't even care that the lies are
known. You're fuckin' sick in the head, you propose stuff that
violates the laws of physics and all witness statements.
THAT is how you help Bush, by painting those of us who believe he
ignored warnings and failed to act as being in the same camp as you
shills.
> Because you are a lost and twisted agent of lies and distraction.
Fuck you, moron, Everything I have said is PROVEN FACT and all you can
come up with is delusional nonsense about your cartoon magic silent
and invisible explosives and gravity defying thermite.
No one believes you.
> You are the one denying facts.
Name ONE. Just one, try it and you'll find out.
> You are blind to the truth or do not want it known.
The truth is known. You are blind to reality. The shit you come up
with is physically impossible; the claims you make are proven lies.
> No one could possibly twist what other people say unless you are lost
> or are doing it on purpose.
That explains you to a "t," KKKookshit rightard. FACT.
*us*
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
"undeniable facts, events, and quotes"
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm
*us*
""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
"undeniable facts, events, and quotes"
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm
*us*
Exactly.
""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
"undeniable facts, events, and quotes"
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm
*us*
is whine about the messenger.
He certainly can't dispute the message.
""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
"undeniable facts, events, and quotes"
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm
Iarnrod
> ""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
> - Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
Ooops, looks like the fool was wrong, doesn't it! They didn't!
Iarnrod
> The always-correct Mighty Iarnrod can't address this fact, either:
Looks like I can, KKKook rightard.
> ""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
> - Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
He was wrong, then, wasn't he! Obvioulsy since they did NOT withstand
the impacts.
That was an easy one!
Iarnrod
> The bushfilth is so weakminded that all he can do
> is whine about the messenger.
>
> He certainly can't dispute the message.
Yet I just did. Looks like you're wrong again, KKKooker rightard. You
haven't been right yet!
> ""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
> - Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
Turns out he was wrong, didn't it!
mr.smartypants
thanks for these efforts to wake up the sheeple.
--
money; what a concept!
Iarnrod
> thanks for these efforts to wake up the sheeple.
Thanks for being a clueless moron.
*us*
the explosives did in reality.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:30:13 -0800 (PST), knews4...@yahoo.com wrote:
>On Nov 7, 4:52�pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 7, 5:29�pm, * US * wrote:
>> > "undeniable facts, events, and quotes"
>>
>> So why do you deny the facts, rightard Bush-serving shill? Why do you
>> continue to promote physically impossible fantasies that help Bush?
>
>How is it someone exposing the 9-11 lies is supporting Bush?
>
>Because you are a lost and twisted agent of lies and distraction.
>You are the one denying facts.
>You are blind to the truth or do not want it known.
>No one could possibly twist what other people say unless you are lost
>or are doing it on purpose.
Exactly.
""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
*us*
towers' steel cores, among many other things.
The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:
""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
*us*
such things as the core structures of the towers.
The bushfilth is so weakminded that all he can do
is whine about the messenger.
He certainly can't dispute the message.
""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
*us*
You're welcome.
*us*
>... being a clueless moron.
Of course you are.
The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:
""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
Iarnrod
> The bushfilth believes that the planes did what
> the explosives did in reality.
BWAHAHAHHAAA!! "Explosives" that are silent and invisible!! STOP!
You're making me laugh too hard!!
Tell us, moron, just how do you plan to address the proven fact that
your claims are physically impossible? Hmmmm?
Iarnrod
> towers' steel cores, among many other things.
>
> The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:
>
> ""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
> - Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
And the fact that this statement has been proven wrong doesn't faze
you in the least, Bushshill?
The buildings obviously did not survive impacts of jetliners, dope.
They fell down.
Geez, talk about denying what your own eyes can see!!
knews4...@yahoo.com
> On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:
>
> > The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
> > towers' steel cores, among many other things.
>
> > The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:
>
> > ""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
> > - Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
>
> And the fact that this statement has been proven wrong doesn't faze
> you in the least, Bushshill?
>
Is he lelping The Carlyle group make money for Bush and Bin Laden by
exposing the lies that they used to start the Wars?
Is he exposing the lies so they can control the oil, pipelines, and
prices?
Go to hell Spook.
> The buildings obviously did not survive impacts of jetliners, dope.
> They fell down.
>
> Geez, talk about denying what your own eyes can see!!
Buildings don't "fall down."
There is no such thing as unexplained "global collapse."
You are a lying Spook.
Iarnrod
> molten steel" at Ground Zero. Bollyn also cites Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled
> Demolition Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, MD, as having seen molten steel in the bottoms of
> elevator shafts "three, four, and five weeks" after the attack."
Lies, of course.
Ever notice the irony that people who call themselves 9/11 truthers
can only lie? Tully said no such thing. Loizeau said no such thing. No
one says they saw molten steel. Anyone who does is wrong because there
was no molten steel. We know this because none was recovered during
the clean up. No hardened slag. DO you "think" it evaporated maybe?
BWAHAAAHAHAHAHAAA!!
knews4...@yahoo.com
Where's the "boom?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn-MCCZ3O1M
Iarnrod
> The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
> has never actually used a cutting torch.
>
> The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
> after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.
>
> The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
> that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.
The moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.
BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!
knews4...@yahoo.com
This one wasn't cut "with a tourch."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY
Iarnrod
> On Nov 9, 10:23 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:> On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:
>
> > > The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
> > > towers' steel cores, among many other things.
>
> > > The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:
>
> > > ""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
> > > - Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
>
> > And the fact that this statement has been proven wrong doesn't faze
> > you in the least, Bushshill?
>
> And he is a Bushshill how?
I already 'splained it to you, rightard KKKook.
He and you provide cover for criminal AWOL Bush and Cheeeeeeeeney by
posing as legitimate critics of their 9/.11 inaction but by tossing
out the most ludicrous, insane, thoroughly disproven and physically
impossible claims that served only to taint legitimate opposition.
Since the stuff you claim is not only disproven already but is in fact
physically impossible, you serve only to make any Americans on the
fence shy away from associating with Bush critics. You serve his ends.
> Is he lelping The Carlyle group make money for Bush and Bin Laden by
> exposing the lies that they used to start the Wars?
You've done no such thing, of course. You're just lying about your own
preposterous lies.
> > The buildings obviously did not survive impacts of jetliners, dope.
> > They fell down.
>
> > Geez, talk about denying what your own eyes can see!!
>
> Buildings don't "fall down."
What the fuck? Of course they do. Do you think they fall UP? Are you
on drugs, knowsknothing?
> There is no such thing as unexplained "global collapse."
I know. This collapse is explained -- plane crashes and fires.
Physics. Dynamic loading. Gravity. What is it about normal earth
things that confuses you?
> You are a lying Spook.
You are. FACT.
Iarnrod
On the sound track, along with the unmistakable flash of brilliant
white light. This device cut a steel rebar. You're not suggesting, i
hope, that these devices somehow were in play on 9/11, are you?
BWAHAHAHAAHAAHAAAA!!!! You'd have needed tens of thousands of them to
cut through steel columns, and event hen you couldn't have done it!!!
Where were all these white housings in the debris? How come none were
found? Did Cheeeeeeeeeney come by cloaked in a trenchcoat and scoop
them all up in the confusion?
This device is not capable of splitting a steel column, nor were steel
columns shown to be damaged in any such fashion. If they had been
present in the massive quantities indicated, the towers would have
looked like fuckin' FIREWORKS on the floors below the collapse front.
This did not happen. As we know, no help was needed because the
weight, mass and energy of the collapsing building above was WAY MORE
than sufficient to completely crush to ground everything below it.
FACT.
Get some help for your mental illness. You are embarrassing your
family.
Iarnrod
What one, kkkook rightard?
Nothing in there was molten. Nothing was "cut" with your cartoon magic
silent and invisible explosives or your gravity defying "thermite"
either.
Why are you on drugs so early in the day?
knews4...@yahoo.com
> Why are you on drugs so early in the day?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Loser smears prove nothing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY
Are you saying you don't see the jagged edged cut beam in the video?
Are you claiming that the woman who got the sample from it is lying to
help George Bush get off for being asleep at the wheel?
Now let's hear it again how 9-11 Truth is helping George Bush.
We need another example of you Spook/Orwellian/Doublespeak.
knews4...@yahoo.com
> On Nov 9, 11:31 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > On Nov 9, 10:22 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:
>
> > > > The bushfilth believes that the planes did what
> > > > the explosives did in reality.
>
> > > BWAHAHAHHAAA!! "Explosives" that are silent and invisible!! STOP!
> > > You're making me laugh too hard!!
>
> > > Tell us, moron, just how do you plan to address the proven fact that
> > > your claims are physically impossible? Hmmmm?
>
> > Where's the "boom?"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn-MCCZ3O1M
>
> On the sound track,
Liar.
>along with the unmistakable flash of brilliant
> white light. This device cut a steel rebar. You're not suggesting, i
> hope, that these devices somehow were in play on 9/11, are you?
> BWAHAHAHAAHAAHAAAA!!!! You'd have needed tens of thousands of them to
> cut through steel columns, and event hen you couldn't have done it!!!
Nano Thermite.
> Where were all these white housings in the debris?
A shaped charge housing ca be made of the same incediary and is
destroyed when ignited.
>How come none were
> found? Did Cheeeeeeeeeney come by cloaked in a trenchcoat and scoop
> them all up in the confusion?
>
No.
He was in the bunker making sure NORAD didn't respond in time.
Bill Benton
> ""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
> - Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
"Demartini, who had an office on the 88th floor of the North Tower, has been
missing since the 9/11/01 attack, having remained in the North Tower to
assist in the evacuation."
He was wrong, and it cost him his life.
knews4...@yahoo.com
No, he knew the buildings would be fine. He knew they would not fail
from the jet hits.
The fires were minimal as the fire department recordings prove.
What he didn't know was that Bush and his cabal had set up the
buildings to be destroyed and to be "the new Pearl Harbor" with his
cousin Marvin at the head of Securicom allowing the building to be
laced with demolition incendiaries.
Iarnrod
> On Nov 9, 11:24 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 9, 11:55 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 9, 10:31 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 9, 10:12 am, * US * wrote:
>
> > > > > The bushfilth is an unintelligent, lazy person who
> > > > > has never actually used a cutting torch.
>
> > > > > The bushfilth doesn't know what metal looks like
> > > > > after it's been cut with a torch, either, of course.
>
> > > > > The bushworshipper doesn't know enough to know
> > > > > that the beam shown wasn't cut with a torch.
>
> > > > The moron kook doesn't know enough to know that the fuckin' video
> > > > SHOWS the clean up workers cutting the columns with torches.
>
> > > > BWAHAHHAHAHAAAAHAAAA!!!
>
> > > This one wasn't cut "with a tourch."http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY
>
> > What one, kkkook rightard?
>
> > Nothing in there was molten. Nothing was "cut" with your cartoon magic
> > silent and invisible explosives or your gravity defying "thermite"
> > either.
>
> You are a blind Spook.
How come I am proven right and you are proven wrong, nutbag?
You're a laugh. Everything you've said is contradicted by FACTS and
PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and every bit of evidence. You're
delusional. It's funny to see you come back and back again with the
same tired disproven bullshit. Keep it up, and please try to find some
NEW shit to make up too because you're repetitiveness is getting
boring; I may have to get off usenet and watch Maury for my trash
entertainment.
> > Why are you on drugs so early in the day?
>
> Loser smears prove nothing.
But FACTS and PHYSICS and WITNESSES and VIDEOS and so on DO prove
something, and they prove me correct adn you wrong., Kooker Rightard.
> Are you saying you don't see the jagged edged cut beam in the video?
Why do you "think" it was cut, kook? Thermite does not do this; that's
the fundamental problem with your "theory;" Thermite isn't physically
capable of doing this.
> Are you claiming that the woman who got the sample from it is lying to
> help George Bush get off for being asleep at the wheel?
You have that backward, kookshit.
There is no evidence the "sample" is even from the WTC, idiot.
And it doesn't show signs of thermite.
> Now let's hear it again how 9-11 Truth is helping George Bush.
By being so totally fuckin' ridiculous and insane with your physically
impossible "theories" that it taints legitimate -- reality-based --
criticism of the incompetent AWOL Bush and Cheeeeeeeney.
> We need another example of you Spook/Orwellian/Doublespeak.
You are the disinfo shill, knowsknothing. That's the FACT.
Iarnrod
> On Nov 9, 11:21 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 9, 11:31 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 9, 10:22 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:
>
> > > > > The bushfilth believes that the planes did what
> > > > > the explosives did in reality.
>
> > > > BWAHAHAHHAAA!! "Explosives" that are silent and invisible!! STOP!
> > > > You're making me laugh too hard!!
>
> > > > Tell us, moron, just how do you plan to address the proven fact that
> > > > your claims are physically impossible? Hmmmm?
>
> > > Where's the "boom?"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn-MCCZ3O1M
>
> > On the sound track,
>
> Liar.
Turn on your computer's speakers next time, kookshit.
Open your ears.
Gawd, you see and hear things that did not happen in one case, then
you don't see or hear things that DO happen in another case. At least
you're consistent -- consistently WRONG! BWAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
> >along with the unmistakable flash of brilliant
> > white light. This device cut a steel rebar. You're not suggesting, i
> > hope, that these devices somehow were in play on 9/11, are you?
> > BWAHAHAHAAHAAHAAAA!!!! You'd have needed tens of thousands of them to
> > cut through steel columns, and even then you couldn't have done it!!!
>
> Nano Thermite.
Ummmm, moron, That's even MORE ridiculous. Too bad it didn't exist.
Too bad that if it did, the tens of thousands of canisters that would
necessarily have to have been used -- even if you could get it to cut
a vertical column, which you cannot do -- would have littered Ground
Zero. Too bad no one found any, eh, aswipe?
> > Where were all these white housings in the debris?
>
> A shaped charge housing ca be made of the same incediary and is
> destroyed when ignited.
BWAHAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!! That's the stupidest thing I've seen yet. A
thermite canister made of thermite!! Good fuckin' luck directing THAT
charge!! BWAHAAHAHAHAAAA!!!
You DO just make shit up as you go along, don't you! This if PROOF of
your intellectual dwarfism.
> >How come none were
> > found? Did Cheeeeeeeeeney come by cloaked in a trenchcoat and scoop
> > them all up in the confusion?
>
> No.
> He was in the bunker making sure NORAD didn't respond in time.
Another claim contradicted by all evidence! Good one, Kooker.
Especially since NORAD responded IMMEDIATELY upon FAA notification.
Some stand-down!! BWAHAHAHAAHAAAA!!! You're batting 0.000.
Now answer the QUESTION that you are trying to dance away from,
rightard: Why did no one find any of your non-existent nano-thermite
canisters?
mr.smartypants
<420ce6bc-85ba-45d3...@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Iarnrod <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
there's a chance that G.w.Bush was chosen because he is so clue-less
people would easily believe he didn't know what was going down.
Cheney ran the destruction of the 3 buildings to get the sheeple into
paying for his war to control OIL.
Iarnrod
> In article
> <420ce6bc-85ba-45d3-9a92-66007d877...@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Get off drugs STAT, nitwit. YOU are the sheeple. You swallow any ol'
garbage that comes along.
*us*
Good point.
*us*
witnesses there at the time heard, and felt, explosions.
The bushfilth believes that the planes did what
the explosives did in reality.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:30:13 -0800 (PST), knews4...@yahoo.com wrote:
*us*
columns and girders, measuring 87 feet by 133 feet"
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/core.html
The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
towers' steel cores, among many other things.
The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:
""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
*us*
>On Nov 9, 10:23�am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 9, 10:00�am, * US * wrote:
>> > The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
>> > towers' steel cores, among many other things.
>> > The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:
>> > ""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
>> > - Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
>>
>> And the fact that this statement has been proven wrong doesn't faze
>> you in the least, Bushshill?
>>
>And he is a Bushshill how?
>Is he lelping The Carlyle group make money for Bush and Bin Laden by
>exposing the lies that they used to start the Wars?
>Is he exposing the lies so they can control the oil, pipelines, and
>prices?
>Go to hell Spook.
Exactly. He claims something had been "proven wrong",
but he has absolutely no proof.
>
>> The buildings obviously did not survive impacts of jetliners, dope.
>> They fell down.
>>
>> Geez, talk about denying what your own eyes can see!!
>
>Buildings don't "fall down."
>There is no such thing as unexplained "global collapse."
>You are a lying Spook.
Indeed.
Magnetic
In a dozen of days CERN’s LHC will kill all of you and all of your
relatives.
Take action, to save your souls!
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/7e292b42c079aa35?hl=en#
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/biz.html
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/civilen.html
Iarnrod
Open your fuckin' ears and you'll hear it, idiot.
Iarnrod
> >On Nov 9, 10:23 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Nov 9, 10:00 am, * US * wrote:
> >> > The bushfilth has to ignore the nature of the
> >> > towers' steel cores, among many other things.
> >> > The bushworshipper can't address this fact, either:
> >> > ""The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"
> >> > - Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction)."
>
> >> And the fact that this statement has been proven wrong doesn't faze
> >> you in the least, Bushshill?
>
> >And he is a Bushshill how?
> >Is he lelping The Carlyle group make money for Bush and Bin Laden by
> >exposing the lies that they used to start the Wars?
> >Is he exposing the lies so they can control the oil, pipelines, and
> >prices?
> >Go to hell Spook.
>
> Exactly. He claims something had been "proven wrong",
I ain't a he.
> but he has absolutely no proof.
I have all the proof. My claims have been proven conclusively and
beyond doubt.
In the meantime, everything you've said is completely contradicted by
all the facts, witnesses, physics, gravity, videos....
You just can't get around the FACT that your claims are proven to be
physically impossible.
> >> The buildings obviously did not survive impacts of jetliners, dope.
> >> They fell down.
>
> >> Geez, talk about denying what your own eyes can see!!
>
> >Buildings don't "fall down."
> >There is no such thing as unexplained "global collapse."
> >You are a lying Spook.
>
> Indeed.
BWAHHAHAHAAAA!!! You and the other moron "knowsknothing" believe
buildings fall UP?!?!? BWAHAHHAAAAAHHAAAH!!!
Thanks for the laugh, kook!
knews4...@yahoo.com
Smears lose.
Name calling loses.
>YOU are the sheeple.
Backwards name calling (Orwellian Doublespeak) loses.
>You swallow any ol'
> garbage that comes along.- Hide quoted text -
>
That would be except your Spook Garbage(R).