World White Population Set to Drop from 17% to 7% by 2050
Divided by Diversity ☺☻☺
As a percentage of world inhabitants, the white population will
plummet to a single digit (9.76%) by 2050 from a high-water mark of
27.98% in 1950.
The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the
status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom. A side
bar will be the single digit minority role that whites will assume. Of
the 7 population groups studied, only whites are projected to sustain
an absolute decline in numbers.
In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world
population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge
to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%. From 2010 the white population
will decline while blacks will add 1.2 billion to their numbers. In
this time frame the the Indian subcontinent will gain 1.2 billion
people. These groups and their governments will be looking for elbow
room, and the diminished presence of whites in Europe, and especially
in the relatively wide open spaces North America, will provide such an
opportunity. Specifically, countries like Canada, the United States,
Argentina, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Russia can expect to be
pressured to accept collectively hundreds of millions of refugees from
India, and sub-Sahara Africa.
www.bnp.org.uk Putting British People First!
edi...@netpath.net
wrote:
> The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the
> status reversal of whites and blacks
Bullshit. The only reason any welfare state can exist - at least thus
far - is the overwhelming majority of residents being net losers to
the welfare state, and thus far that's limited welfare states to the
white nations. Black-majority nations have all either been poor to
start with - or became so within a generation of blacks gaining
political control, as in Zimbabwe.
Thus a status reversal of whites and blacks is implausible. Only
plausible outcome of a black-majority nation is poverty for all.
http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/08/04/where-is-your-townhall/ is
the all-states, continually-updated calendar of "town halls."
http://www.Internet-Gun-Show.com - your source for hard-to-find stuff!
Strabo
> On Sep 22, 2:43� pm, Divided by Diversity ☺☻☺ <stja...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>> The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the
>> status reversal of whites and blacks
>
> Bullshit. The only reason any welfare state can exist - at least thus
> far - is the overwhelming majority of residents being net losers to
> the welfare state, and thus far that's limited welfare states to the
> white nations. Black-majority nations have all either been poor to
> start with - or became so within a generation of blacks gaining
> political control, as in Zimbabwe.
> Thus a status reversal of whites and blacks is implausible. Only
> plausible outcome of a black-majority nation is poverty for all.
>
Which is in keeping with Africa as European derived culture diminishes.
Too_Many_Tools
And as we have seen...the only plausible outcome of a Republican-
majority nation is poverty for all also.
TMT
hal
<edi...@netpath.net> wrote:
>On Sep 22, 2:43=C2=A0pm, Divided by Diversity =E2=98=BA=E2=98=BB=E2=98=BA =
><stja...@googlemail.com>
>wrote:
>> The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the
>> status reversal of whites and blacks
>
>Bullshit. The only reason any welfare state can exist - at least thus
>far - is the overwhelming majority of residents being net losers to
>the welfare state, and thus far that's limited welfare states to the
>white nations. Black-majority nations have all either been poor to
>start with - or became so within a generation of blacks gaining
>political control, as in Zimbabwe.
>Thus a status reversal of whites and blacks is implausible. Only
>plausible outcome of a black-majority nation is poverty for all.
yikes
hal
<too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Sep 22, 5:02=C2=A0pm, "edi...@netpath.net" <edi...@netpath.net> wrote:
>> On Sep 22, 2:43=C2=A0pm, Divided by Diversity =C2=A0=E2=98=BA=E2=98=BB=E2=
>=98=BA <stja...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the
>> > status reversal of whites and blacks
>>
>> Bullshit. =C2=A0The only reason any welfare state can exist - at least th=
>us
>> far - is the overwhelming majority of residents being net losers to
>> the welfare state, and thus far that's limited welfare states to the
>> white nations. =C2=A0Black-majority nations have all either been poor to
>> start with - or became so within a generation of blacks gaining
>> political control, as in Zimbabwe.
>> Thus a status reversal of whites and blacks is implausible. =C2=A0Only
>> plausible outcome of a black-majority nation is poverty for all.
>>
>> http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/08/04/where-is-your-townhall/is
>> the all-states, continually-updated calendar of "town halls."
>>
>> http://www.Internet-Gun-Show.com- your source for hard-to-find stuff!
>
>And as we have seen...the only plausible outcome of a Republican-
>majority nation is poverty for all also.
don't forget the upper 1% of the population. They own and control
everything. For them their wealth keeps going up and up while
everyone else keeps getting poorer. That is what capitalism is.
>
>TMT
Demon Buddha
> edi...@netpath.net wrote:
>> On Sep 22, 2:43� pm, Divided by Diversity ☺☻☺
>> <stja...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the
>>> status reversal of whites and blacks
>>
>> Bullshit. The only reason any welfare state can exist - at least thus
>> far - is the overwhelming majority of residents being net losers to
>> the welfare state, and thus far that's limited welfare states to the
>> white nations. Black-majority nations have all either been poor to
>> start with - or became so within a generation of blacks gaining
>> political control, as in Zimbabwe.
>
>> Thus a status reversal of whites and blacks is implausible. Only
>> plausible outcome of a black-majority nation is poverty for all.
>>
>
> Which is in keeping with Africa as European derived culture diminishes.
It is rather interesting to begin to see the degree to which we have
all been lied to most grandly and egregiously about how eville(tm) the
white Euros were. Sure, "we" did some fucked up stuff, but no worse
than any other group. In fact, "we" were just a bit more clever about
it than most other groups, and we had technology on our side because we
were the only ones interested in developing it.
When I took a black studies class at CCNY in 83 (required for a
teaching certificate in NYC), the instructor (who was a really cool guy
from Kenya) made the mistaken assertion that life was idyllic in Africa
prior to the arrival of Euros. It was anything but that. Where the
Euros exercised some restraint, for example, in not destroying civilian
populations (not in all cases, that is for sure), the black Africans
routinely engaged in genocides - wiping out entire villages and in some
cases cultures. I read a book by Sir Richard Burton (I think it was
him, anyhow) where he interviewed a black warrior named "Chaggi" who
described the process of raiding another village. Every warrior you
killed, you found their wives and children and killed them all. That
was standard operating procedure. This was back in the 1920s, as I
recall, and went back to antiquity as a practice. This is certainly as
"evil" as anything white people have ever engaged in.
I recall when Bob Marley was singing the virtues of the "liberation" of
Zimbabwe. Look at them now - an unmitigated shit hole along with most
of the rest of Africa. Let them have their continent and let what we
witness serve to remind us all that "we" are not what "they" would have
us believe.
To add an on-topic element to all of this, I would say that the claims
asserted above make private ownership of weapons more critical to us all
than ever before. All the apparent racial hatred spewed forth by the
original poster doesn't make for the warm and fuzzies for anyone, as far
as I can see. Therefore, let us all be armed and remain ever so polite
with each other. The rest we can work on as time passes.
Demon Buddha
> don't forget the upper 1% of the population. They own and control
> everything. For them their wealth keeps going up and up while
> everyone else keeps getting poorer. That is what capitalism is.
You are ignorant. You do not know the difference between fre market
capitalism and rigged-market capitalism. We live in the latter, not the
former.
Get an education before opening your mouth. You will have far less
cause for embarrassment.
Demon Buddha
> On Sep 22, 2:43 pm, Divided by Diversity ☺☻☺ <stja...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>> The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the
>> status reversal of whites and blacks
>
> Bullshit. The only reason any welfare state can exist - at least thus
> far - is the overwhelming majority of residents being net losers to
> the welfare state, and thus far that's limited welfare states to the
> white nations. Black-majority nations have all either been poor to
> start with - or became so within a generation of blacks gaining
> political control, as in Zimbabwe.
> Thus a status reversal of whites and blacks is implausible. Only
> plausible outcome of a black-majority nation is poverty for all.
It is an interesting notion, eh? Get rid of the Eville(tm) white
people and who will be providing the welfare checks? If one thinks
about it, for the welfare parasite, the last thing they should want is
to eliminate the white "privilege" (which is no privilege at all but
just a phony baloney meme used to further a POV). After all, the white
mules have been paying their way for what is going on 5 generations now.
I would call that pretty cushy, in a morbid kind of way.
hal
wrote:
unfettered capitalism gives us child labor and 70 work weeks for a
dollar an hour. Capitalism means exploitation of the poor, plain and
simple. Free markets means putting the foxes in charge of the
henhouse, then wondering why all the chickens are either dead or
running down the road for their lives. Free market capitalism gives
us hundreds of millions without enough food to feed their children
while an elite few live the lavish spoiled lives of royalty.
Abraham Laboriel
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:42:18 -0400, Demon Buddha <Nob...@no.where>
> wrote:
>
>
>>hal wrote:
>>
>>
>>>don't forget the upper 1% of the population. They own and control
>>>everything. For them their wealth keeps going up and up while
>>>everyone else keeps getting poorer. That is what capitalism is.
>>
>> You are ignorant. You do not know the difference between fre market
>>capitalism and rigged-market capitalism. We live in the latter, not the
>>former.
>>
>> Get an education before opening your mouth. You will have far less
>>cause for embarrassment.
>
>
> unfettered capitalism gives us child labor and 70 work weeks for a
> dollar an hour.
You were warned to get an education before opening your mouth and being
embarrassed in front of the entire free world.
Too late!
Klaus Schadenfreude
>Free market capitalism gives
>us hundreds of millions without enough food to feed their children
>while an elite few live the lavish spoiled lives of royalty.
Much better to model on North Korea's form of government. No starving
children there.
SaPeIsMa
"hal" wrote in message news:4aba4f08...@news.newsguy.com...
You repeat these mantras like any religious fanatic repeat theirs
In actual fact, you are no different from any religious fanatic in your
behavior and blind faith
HH&C
wrote:
Don't they have universal health care? Oooops. That's Cuba. No
starving kids in Cuba, right?
HH&C
> "hal" wrote in messagenews:4aba4f08...@news.newsguy.com...
Oh, oh. Alberto Smudge will repeat his "CrazyMotherF....." mantra is
he sees that.
Demon Buddha
All you have managed to do here is repeat yourself. Same ignorant
nonsense, my friend. You don't have a clue as to what it is you are
talking about. As I said, get an education and then come back and have
something to say. You might try by first learning what free market
capitalism actually is because it is abundantly apparent that you
currently have no clue. Then learn about rigged market capitalism,
which is the thing about which you are really complaining. Once you
have done that, compare the two and you will that they are radically
differing creatures. Until then you should hold your tongue, so to
speak, because you only serve to embarrass yourself otherwise.
HH&C
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:02:32 -0700 (PDT), "edi...@netpath.net"
>
> <edi...@netpath.net> wrote:
> >wrote:
> >> The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the
> >> status reversal of whites and blacks
>
> >Bullshit. The only reason any welfare state can exist - at least thus
> >far - is the overwhelming majority of residents being net losers to
> >the welfare state, and thus far that's limited welfare states to the
> >white nations. Black-majority nations have all either been poor to
> >start with - or became so within a generation of blacks gaining
> >political control, as in Zimbabwe.
> >Thus a status reversal of whites and blacks is implausible. Only
> >plausible outcome of a black-majority nation is poverty for all.
>
> people from fucking? If they outfuck whites they become the majority.
> And they are. End of story.
Sheesh, Winston! Do you eat with that mouth?
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> I had to reduce it to terms that liberals can readily understand. They
> are not too bright and simple images seem to get their attention better
> than actual thoughts. Most of the worlds great pornographers have been
> liberal. I rest my case.
You got a problem with porn?
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Images of Argentina: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRCbAeHxgGE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HH&C
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:18:35 -0700 (PDT), "HH&C" wrote:
> They are not too bright and simple images seem to get their attention
> better than actual thoughts. Most of the worlds great pornographers
> have been liberal. I rest my case.
Welp, I think you're wrong. They don't "outfuck" us, we simply use
more birth control.
HH&C
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:31:24 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:18:35 -0700 (PDT), "HH&C" wrote:
>
> >>On Sep 29, 10:05 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote:
>
> >>> Are you seriously telling us that being black, or poor, or both keeps
> >>> people from fucking? If they outfuck whites they become the majority.
> >>> And they are. End of story.
>
> >>Sheesh, Winston! Do you eat with that mouth?
>
> > I had to reduce it to terms that liberals can readily understand. They
> > are not too bright and simple images seem to get their attention better
> > than actual thoughts. Most of the worlds great pornographers have been
> > liberal. I rest my case.
>
> You got a problem with porn?
You got a problem with morality?
> --
> Regards, Curly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Images of Argentina:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRCbAeHxgGE
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Divided by Diversity ☺☻☺
As a percentage of world inhabitants, the white population will
plummet to a single digit (9.76%) by 2060 from a high-water mark of
27.98% in 1950.
Using 2010 as the base reference, the big gainer in the population
derby will be blacks or sub-Sahara Africans. This group will expand
almost 133% to 2.7 billion by 2060. By the middle of this century
blacks will represent 25.38% of world population, which is up
dramatically from the 8.97% they recorded in 1950.
In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world
population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge
to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%. From 2010 the white population
will decline while blacks will add 1.2 billion to their numbers. In
this time frame the the Indian subcontinent will gain 1.2 billion
people. These groups and their governments will be looking for elbow
room, and the diminished presence of whites in Europe, and especially
in the relatively wide open spaces North America, will provide such an
opportunity. Specifically, countries like Canada, the United States,
Argentina, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Russia can expect to be
pressured to accept collectively hundreds of millions of refugees from
India, and sub-Sahara Africa.
http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=population
www.stormfront.org
www.davidduke.com
www.iamthewitness.com
www.skadi.net
Abraham Laboriel
> World White Population Set to Drop from 17% to 7% by 2050
Then get a tan if yer upset, you pasty white pukewad.