On Nov 9, 10:13 pm, Winston_Smith <
not_r...@bogus.net> wrote:
> This is the writing of a college educated person in a line of work
> that is generally described as "Professional".
>
> Bad spelling, bad grammar, incoherent thought processes. I won't even
> mention that his arguments could be shot down by a eighth grader.
> WS
>
>
http://www.scribd.com/NidalHasan> NidalHasan scribbled: There was a grenade thrown amongs a group of
> American soldiers. One of the soldiers, feeling that it was to late
> for everyone to flee jumped on the grave with the intention of saving
> his comrades. Indeed he saved them. He inentionally took his life
> (suicide) for a noble cause i.e. saving the lives of his soldier. To
> say that this soldier committed suicide is inappropriate. Its more
> appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a
> more noble cause. Scholars have paralled this to suicide bombers whose
> intention, by sacrificing their lives, is to help save Muslims by
> killing enemy soldiers. If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy
> soldiers because they were caught off guard that would be considered a
> strategic victory. Their intention is not to die because of some
> despair. The same can be said for the Kamikazees in Japan. They died
> (via crashing their planes into ships) to kill the enemies for the
> homeland. You can call them crazy i you want but their act was not one
> of suicide that is despised by Islam. So the scholars main point is
> that "IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOUR INTENTION IS THE MAIN ISSUE" and Allah
> (SWT) knows best.
He should have titled it a "Manifesto" and won a Peace Prize.