Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Why did Michell Obama lose her law license?

1,185 views
Skip to first unread message

Harry Reid Truth Center

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 11:29:50 AM9/4/12
to
Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�

Sure, I saw this on the front page of the New York Times during
the elections of 2008, �NOT.�

I've listed below from the State of Illinois�s website of the
court action against Michelle forcing her to give up her
license. It�s understood that in the box attacked below under
Malpractice Insurance � �No malpractice report required as
attorney is under court order inactive status.�

In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her
license and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period.
I hate to use this word but its �rumored� that she was extorting
clients. Again, it�s �rumored!� It�s also �rumored� that our
President Barack Obama may have been disciplined for not
divulging other names that he has used in the past. That really
concerns me. He also has an inactive Illinois license to
practice law (listed below).

This is so unfortunate for the Obama�s, after all they are our
first family and he is the first black/white President of the
United States but I can�t stop thinking that this guy and his
wife are not who they say they are. They don�t seem to uphold
the integrity of our past first families, yes, even Richard
Nixon for all you lefties out there.

The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when
doing their background check must have been sleeping at the
switch. My research is finding reputable sources disclosing many
of their past discretion's and questionable acquaintances.

Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to
worry about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves
living in the White House?
If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search
under �Obama.� Bingo!

This was taken from the Illinois Law website two years ago -
Since than they have altered the court order portion most likely
since this article was originally posted back in 2010.

https://www.iardc.org/index.html



LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY'S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY
RECORD

ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and
Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December
31, 2009 at 1:23:34 PM:

Full Licensed Name:
Michelle Obama
Full Former name(s):
Michelle Lavaughn Robinson
Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
May 12, 1989
Registered Business Address:
Not available online
Registered Business Phone:
Not available online
Illinois Registration Status:
Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law
Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of
registration;consult attorney for further information)
No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered
inactive status.

Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings:
None

http://www.libertynewsonline.com/editorialview.php?editid=31723&
imgnr=2


ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and
Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December
31, 2009 at 1:23:34 PM:
Full Licensed Name:
Barack Hussein Obama
Full Former name(s):
None
Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
December 17, 1991
Registered Business Address:
Not available online
Registered Business Phone:
Not available online
Illinois Registration Status:
Voluntarily retired and not authorized to practice law
Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of
registration;consult attorney for further information)
No malpractice report required as attorney is retired.



I wanted to include this comment taken from Atlas Shrugs blog
site. It's quite revealing. LINK

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/wtf-
michelle-ob.html

In case readers are wondering....in 1992 Michelle Obama was
still an active member of illinois bar but had left sidley
austin law firm to go work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley
in Chicago-she worked as Daleys "assistant" for a year and a
half-(that term drives me nuts but that is how it is listed on
her BIO--she was his "assistant..." thats a FACT!now what does a
Harvard trained 'assistant" do for the most corrupt mayor and
city gov in america...???

After working in 1992 for Daley...in 1993 she assumed a role in
some community organziing venture called PUBLIC ALLIES (another
community organizer in the family?)my smell test tells me as
Daleys assistant...she was not always doing something
kosher...and in 1992 she was still member of the bar...perhaps
after her dealings with him and for him...she was CAUGHT doing
some shenigans...and was put on court ordered inactive status
later in 1993--after the issue was brought to the ADRC
attention.seriously, it is not a far stretch of the imagination
to wonder if Michelle Obama was working for Daley in 1992 and
her license went on COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her
connection and work with him...that she is not guilty of
SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or worse...she did
something illegal.

UPDATE 9/30/11
The Manning Report at www.atlah.org
is an expose by a black preacher of the obamas. He says Michelle
was forced to give up her license

($394,000 missing from Cook County Hospital where she worked) in
exchange for no criminal sentencing. He also says that Barack
Obama is a fraud.

WHY do you people think 'obama' sealed all his Illinois state
bar exam results and records of what he did while he was in
Illinois???????????????Can you get some reality??????????

And why do you think he has spent MILLIONS of dollars sealing
ALL records???

Please open your eyes and wake up America? Or do you really want
a communist muslim destroying your country?"
---------------------------

http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html

http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_31723.php

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 12:01:10 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”

It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp

Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
it or surrender it.

Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 12:17:33 PM9/4/12
to
I always thought the Obamas lost their law licenses because they
failed continuing education, a requirement to retain their licence as
active. Since they no longer had the connections from law school they
couldn't cheat or take advantage of the Bell Curve.

They both failed the required 'continuing education' and weren't up to
it because the 'social advancement' they received by working the
system screaming "racist" was no longer there. The Board of
Professional Regulation isn't as politicized as Liberal run colleges.

Good post, thanks

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 12:26:05 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status

So is her husband.

Mcafee

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 12:44:01 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�
>
> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>
> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
> it or surrender it.
>
The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid prosecution.

Mcafee

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 12:44:50 PM9/4/12
to
Obama got caught practicing under a pseudonym.

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 12:52:15 PM9/4/12
to
That is a lie.


> She did so to avoid prosecution.

That's another lie. She wasn't under investigation or threat of
prosecution for anything. Stop lying.

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 12:52:44 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
That's another lie. Stop lying.

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 12:54:57 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 9:26 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
No, Barack Obama apparently *did* voluntarily retire (not "surrender")
his license, rather than place it on inactive status, but there is no
evidence he did so under any legal cloud of suspicion.

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 12:57:49 PM9/4/12
to
> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>
> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>
> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.� Sure, I saw this on the front page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, �NOT.� I�ve listed below from the State of Illinois�s website of the court action against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It�s understood that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance � �No malpractice report required as attorney is under court order inactive status.�
> In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use this word but its �rumored� that she was extorting clients. Again, it�s �rumored!� It�s also �rumored� that our President Barack Obama may have been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has used in the past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive Illinois license to practice law (listed below).
> This is so unfortunate for the Obama�s, after all they are our first family and he is the first black/white President of the United States but I can�t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they say they are. They don�t seem to uphold the integrity of our past first families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
> The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when doing their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past discretion�s and questionable acquaintances.
> Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the White House?
> If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under �Obama.� Bingo!
> https://www.iardc.org/index.html
>
> LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY�S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
>
> ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 31, 2009 at 1:23:34 PM:
> Full Licensed Name:
> Michelle Obama
> Full Former name(s):
> Michelle Lavaughn Robinson
> Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
> May 12, 1989
> Registered Business Address:
> Not available online
> Registered Business Phone:
> Not available online
> Illinois Registration Status:
> Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law
> Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of registration;consult attorney for further information)
> No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.
>
> Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings:
> None
>
> ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 31, 2009 at 1:23:34 PM:
> Full Licensed Name:
> Barack Hussein Obama
> Full Former name(s):
> None
> Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
> December 17, 1991
> Registered Business Address:
> Not available online
> Registered Business Phone:
> Not available online
> Illinois Registration Status:
> Voluntarily retired and not authorized to practice law
> Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of registration;consult attorney for further information)
> No malpractice report required as attorney is retired.
> I wanted to include this comment taken from Atlas Shrugs blog site. It�s quite revealing. LINK http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/wtf-michell�
> In case readers are wondering�.in 1992 Michelle Obama was still an active member of illinois bar but had left sidley austin law firm to go work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley in Chicago-she worked as Daleys �assistant� for a year and a half-(that term drives me nuts but that is how it is listed on her BIO�she was his �assistant�� thats a FACT!now what does a harvard trained �assistant� do for the most corrupt mayor and city gov in america�???after working in 1992 for Daley�in 1993 she assumed a role in some community organziing venture called PUBLIC ALLIES (another community organizer in the family?)my smell test tells me as Daleys assistant�she was not always doing something kosher�and in 1992 she was still member of the bar�perhaps after her dealings with him and for him�she was CAUGHT doing some shenigans�and was put on court ordered inactive status later in 1993�after the issue was brought to the ADRC attention.seriously, it is not a far stretch of the imagination to wo
nder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him�that she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or worse�she did something illegal

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 12:57:57 PM9/4/12
to
> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>
> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>
> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.� Sure, I saw this on the front page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, �NOT.� I�ve listed below from the State of Illinois�s website of the court action against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It�s understood that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance � �No malpractice report required as attorney is under court order inactive status.�
> In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use this word but its �rumored� that she was extorting clients. Again, it�s �rumored!� It�s also �rumored� that our President Barack Obama may have been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has used in the past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive Illinois license to practice law (listed below).
> This is so unfortunate for the Obama�s, after all they are our first family and he is the first black/white President of the United States but I can�t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they say they are. They don�t seem to uphold the integrity of our past first families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
> The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when doing their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past discretion�s and questionable acquaintances.
> Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the White House?
> If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under �Obama.� Bingo!
> https://www.iardc.org/index.html
>
> LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY�S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
>
> ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 31, 2009 at 1:23:34 PM:
> Full Licensed Name:
> Michelle Obama
> Full Former name(s):
> Michelle Lavaughn Robinson
> Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
> May 12, 1989
> Registered Business Address:
> Not available online
> Registered Business Phone:
> Not available online
> Illinois Registration Status:
> Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law
> Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of registration;consult attorney for further information)
> No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.
>
> Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings:
> None
>
> ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 31, 2009 at 1:23:34 PM:
> Full Licensed Name:
> Barack Hussein Obama
> Full Former name(s):
> None
> Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
> December 17, 1991
> Registered Business Address:
> Not available online
> Registered Business Phone:
> Not available online
> Illinois Registration Status:
> Voluntarily retired and not authorized to practice law
> Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of registration;consult attorney for further information)
> No malpractice report required as attorney is retired.

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 12:59:32 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 10:54 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>
>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status

> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>
> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>
> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.� Sure, I saw this on the front page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, �NOT.� I�ve listed below from the State of Illinois�s website of the court action against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It�s understood that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance � �No malpractice report required as attorney is under court order inactive status.�
> In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use this word but its �rumored� that she was extorting clients. Again, it�s �rumored!� It�s also �rumored� that our President Barack Obama may have been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has used in the past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive Illinois license to practice law (listed below).
> This is so unfortunate for the Obama�s, after all they are our first family and he is the first black/white President of the United States but I can�t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they say they are. They don�t seem to uphold the integrity of our past first families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
> The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when doing their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past discretion�s and questionable acquaintances.
> Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the White House?
> If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under �Obama.� Bingo!
> https://www.iardc.org/index.html
>
> LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY�S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
>
> ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 31, 2009 at 1:23:34 PM:
> Full Licensed Name:
> Michelle Obama
> Full Former name(s):
> Michelle Lavaughn Robinson
> Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
> May 12, 1989
> Registered Business Address:
> Not available online
> Registered Business Phone:
> Not available online
> Illinois Registration Status:
> Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law
> Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of registration;consult attorney for further information)
> No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.
>
> Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings:
> None
>
> ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 31, 2009 at 1:23:34 PM:
> Full Licensed Name:
> Barack Hussein Obama
> Full Former name(s):
> None
> Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
> December 17, 1991
> Registered Business Address:
> Not available online
> Registered Business Phone:
> Not available online
> Illinois Registration Status:
> Voluntarily retired and not authorized to practice law
> Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of registration;consult attorney for further information)
> No malpractice report required as attorney is retired.

George Plimpton

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:05:00 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:26 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>>>
>>>> So is her husband.
>>>
>>> Obama got caught practicing under a pseudonym.
>>
>> That's another lie. Stop lying.
>>
>
>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>
>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>
>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
>> back in 1993?

It's a lie: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:05:45 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>>
>>>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>
>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>>>> it or surrender it.
>>>>
>>> The court ordered her to surrender it.
>>
>> That is a lie.
>>
>>
>>> She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>
>> That's another lie. She wasn't under investigation or threat of
>> prosecution for anything. Stop lying.
>
>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License

No, she didn't. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:06:17 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 9:59 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 10:54 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>
>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>
>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>
>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html

Wrong. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp

SaPeIsMa

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:07:34 PM9/4/12
to

"meso-scalar" <pl...@ci.ty> wrote in message
news:k25a2m$3g3$1...@dont-email.me...
> On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>
> So is her husband.

Well, he has been and apparently still is "present"
But other than that you may be right.

M.I.Wakefield

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:14:05 PM9/4/12
to
"Mcafee" wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/

"But the claim that the Obamas �surrendered� their licenses to avoid ethics
charges has no basis in fact."

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:19:52 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 10:14 AM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:
> "Mcafee" wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>
>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> > On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>> >> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>> >> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>> >
>> > It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>> >
>> > Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>> > it or surrender it.
>> >
>> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid prosecution.
>
> http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/
>
> "But the claim that the Obamas “surrendered” their licenses to avoid
> ethics charges has no basis in fact."

Correct.

There are plenty of solid grounds for opposing Obama's reelection
without inventing crackpot irrelevant bullshit.

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:20:35 PM9/4/12
to
Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.� Sure, I saw this on the front
page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, �NOT.� I�ve
listed below from the State of Illinois�s website of the court action
against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It�s understood
that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance � �No
malpractice report required as attorney is under court order inactive
status.�
In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license
and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use
this word but its �rumored� that she was extorting clients. Again, it�s
�rumored!� It�s also �rumored� that our President Barack Obama may have
been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has used in the
past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive Illinois license
to practice law (listed below).
This is so unfortunate for the Obama�s, after all they are our first
family and he is the first black/white President of the United States
but I can�t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they
say they are. They don�t seem to uphold the integrity of our past first
families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when doing
their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My
research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past
discretion�s and questionable acquaintances.
Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry
about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the
White House?
If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under
�Obama.� Bingo!
https://www.iardc.org/index.html

LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY�S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD

ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public
Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 31, 2009 at
1:23:34 PM:
Full Licensed Name:
Michelle Obama
Full Former name(s):
Michelle Lavaughn Robinson
Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
May 12, 1989
Registered Business Address:
Not available online
Registered Business Phone:
Not available online
Illinois Registration Status:
Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law
Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of registration;consult
attorney for further information)
No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered
inactive status.

Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings:
None

ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public
Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 31, 2009 at
1:23:34 PM:
Full Licensed Name:
Barack Hussein Obama
Full Former name(s):
None
Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
December 17, 1991
Registered Business Address:
Not available online
Registered Business Phone:
Not available online
Illinois Registration Status:
Voluntarily retired and not authorized to practice law
Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of registration;consult
attorney for further information)
No malpractice report required as attorney is retired.
I wanted to include this comment taken from Atlas Shrugs blog site.
It�s quite revealing. LINK
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/wtf-michell�
In case readers are wondering�.in 1992 Michelle Obama was still an
active member of illinois bar but had left sidley austin law firm to go
work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley in Chicago-she worked as
Daleys �assistant� for a year and a half-(that term drives me nuts but
that is how it is listed on her BIO�she was his �assistant�� thats a
FACT!now what does a harvard trained �assistant� do for the most corrupt
mayor and city gov in america�???after working in 1992 for Daley�in 1993
she assumed a role in some community organziing venture called PUBLIC
ALLIES (another community organizer in the family?)my smell test tells
me as Daleys assistant�she was not always doing something kosher�and in
1992 she was still member of the bar�perhaps after her dealings with him
and for him�she was CAUGHT doing some shenigans�and was put on court
ordered inactive status later in 1993�after the issue was brought to the
ADRC attention.seriously, it is not a far stretch of the imagination to
wonder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him�that
she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or
worse�she did something illegal.

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:20:44 PM9/4/12
to
wonder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him�that
she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or
worse�she did something illegal.

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:20:50 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:05 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�
>>>>>
>>>>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>>
>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>>>>> it or surrender it.
>>>>>
>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it.
>>>
>>> That is a lie.
>>>
>>>
>>>> She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>>
>>> That's another lie. She wasn't under investigation or threat of
>>> prosecution for anything. Stop lying.
>>
>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>
> No, she didn't. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>

Michelle Obama Loses Law License

http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html

Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
wonder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him�that
she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or
worse�she did something illegal.

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:29:32 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 10:20 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:14 AM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:
>> "Mcafee" wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>>
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>> > On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>> >> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>> >> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>> >
>>> > It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>> >
>>> > Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>>> > it or surrender it.
>>> >
>>> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>
>> http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/
>>
>> "But the claim that the Obamas “surrendered” their licenses to avoid
>> ethics charges has no basis in fact."
>
> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>
> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html

You keep repeating the same discredited debunked bullshit. It's still
bullshit. She did not "lose" or "surrender" her law license. It is in
inactive status.

Stop lying, cocksucker.

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:30:01 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 10:20 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:06 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 9:59 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 10:54 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>>
>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>>
>>>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>
>> Wrong. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>
>
> Michelle Obama Loses Law License

She didn't.

George Plimpton

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:30:33 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 10:20 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:05 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>>>> lose
>>>>>> it or surrender it.
>>>>>>
>>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it.
>>>>
>>>> That is a lie.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>>>
>>>> That's another lie. She wasn't under investigation or threat of
>>>> prosecution for anything. Stop lying.
>>>
>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>
>> No, she didn't. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>
>
> Michelle Obama Loses Law License

False.

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:34:49 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:19 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 10:14 AM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:
>> "Mcafee" wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>>
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>> > On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>> >> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>> >> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�
>>> >
>>> > It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>> >
>>> > Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>>> > it or surrender it.
>>> >
>>> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>
>> http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/
>>
>> "But the claim that the Obamas �surrendered� their licenses to avoid
>> ethics charges has no basis in fact."
>
> Correct.
>
> There are plenty of solid grounds for opposing Obama's reelection
> without inventing crackpot irrelevant bullshit.
>

Michelle Obama Loses Law License

http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html

Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.� Sure, I saw this on the front
page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, �NOT.� I�ve
listed below from the State of Illinois�s website of the court action
against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It�s understood
that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance � �No
malpractice report required as attorney is under court order inactive
status.�
In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license
and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use
this word but its �rumored� that she was extorting clients. Again, it�s
�rumored!� It�s also �rumored� that our President Barack Obama may have
been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has used in the
past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive Illinois license
to practice law (listed below).
This is so unfortunate for the Obama�s, after all they are our first
family and he is the first black/white President of the United States
but I can�t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they
say they are. They don�t seem to uphold the integrity of our past first
families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when doing
their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My
research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past
discretion�s and questionable acquaintances.
Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry
about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the
White House?
If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under
�Obama.� Bingo!
https://www.iardc.org/index.html

LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY�S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD

ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public
Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 31, 2009 at
1:23:34 PM:
Full Licensed Name:
Michelle Obama
Full Former name(s):
Michelle Lavaughn Robinson
Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
May 12, 1989
Registered Business Address:
Not available online
Registered Business Phone:
Not available online
Illinois Registration Status:
Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law
Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of registration;consult
attorney for further information)
No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered
inactive status.

Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings:
None

ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public
Disciplinary and Disability Information as of December 31, 2009 at
1:23:34 PM:
Full Licensed Name:
Barack Hussein Obama
Full Former name(s):
None
Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court:
December 17, 1991
Registered Business Address:
Not available online
Registered Business Phone:
Not available online
Illinois Registration Status:
Voluntarily retired and not authorized to practice law
Malpractice Insurance: (Current as of date of registration;consult
attorney for further information)
No malpractice report required as attorney is retired.
I wanted to include this comment taken from Atlas Shrugs blog site.
It�s quite revealing. LINK
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/wtf-michell�
In case readers are wondering�.in 1992 Michelle Obama was still an
active member of illinois bar but had left sidley austin law firm to go
work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley in Chicago-she worked as
Daleys �assistant� for a year and a half-(that term drives me nuts but
that is how it is listed on her BIO�she was his �assistant�� thats a
FACT!now what does a harvard trained �assistant� do for the most corrupt
mayor and city gov in america�???after working in 1992 for Daley�in 1993
she assumed a role in some community organziing venture called PUBLIC
ALLIES (another community organizer in the family?)my smell test tells
me as Daleys assistant�she was not always doing something kosher�and in
1992 she was still member of the bar�perhaps after her dealings with him
and for him�she was CAUGHT doing some shenigans�and was put on court
ordered inactive status later in 1993�after the issue was brought to the
ADRC attention.seriously, it is not a far stretch of the imagination to
wonder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him�that
she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:36:09 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:29 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 10:20 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 11:14 AM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:
>>> "Mcafee" wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>>>
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> > On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>> >> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>> >> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�
>>>> >
>>>> > It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>> >
>>>> > Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>> lose
>>>> > it or surrender it.
>>>> >
>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>>
>>> http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/
>>>
>>> "But the claim that the Obamas �surrendered� their licenses to avoid
>>> ethics charges has no basis in fact."
>>
>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>
>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>
> You keep repeating the same discredited debunked bullshit. It's still
> bullshit. She did not "lose" or "surrender" her law license. It is in
> inactive status.
>
> Stop lying, cocksucker.
>
Michelle Obama Loses Law License

http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html

Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:38:29 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:30 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 10:20 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 11:05 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>>>>> lose
>>>>>>> it or surrender it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is a lie.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's another lie. She wasn't under investigation or threat of
>>>>> prosecution for anything. Stop lying.
>>>>
>>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>
>>> No, she didn't. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>
>>
>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>
> False.
>

Well....ya never know...

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:38:51 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 10:34 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:19 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 10:14 AM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:
>>> "Mcafee" wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>>>
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> > On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>> >> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>> >> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>> >
>>>> > It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>> >
>>>> > Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>> lose
>>>> > it or surrender it.
>>>> >
>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>>
>>> http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/
>>>
>>> "But the claim that the Obamas “surrendered” their licenses to avoid
>>> ethics charges has no basis in fact."
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>> There are plenty of solid grounds for opposing Obama's reelection
>> without inventing crackpot irrelevant bullshit.
>>
>
> Michelle Obama Loses Law License

False.

George Plimpton

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:39:52 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 10:36 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:29 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 10:20 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 11:14 AM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:
>>>> "Mcafee" wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>> > On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>> >> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>> >> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>>> lose
>>>>> > it or surrender it.
>>>>> >
>>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid
>>>>> prosecution.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/
>>>>
>>>> "But the claim that the Obamas “surrendered” their licenses to avoid
>>>> ethics charges has no basis in fact."
>>>
>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>
>>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>
>> You keep repeating the same discredited debunked bullshit. It's still
>> bullshit. She did not "lose" or "surrender" her law license. It is in
>> inactive status.
>>
>> Stop lying, cocksucker.
>>
> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>
> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html

Debunked and discredited bullshit.

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 1:41:08 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 10:38 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:30 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 10:20 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 11:05 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>>>>>> lose
>>>>>>>> it or surrender it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is a lie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's another lie. She wasn't under investigation or threat of
>>>>>> prosecution for anything. Stop lying.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>>
>>>> No, she didn't. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>
>>>
>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>
>> False.
>>
>
> Well....ya never know...

No, we *do* know - we know the claim that Michelle Obama "surrendered"
her law license is debunked and discredited bullshit. *YOU* know it, too.

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 2:00:41 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:41 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 10:38 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 11:30 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 10:20 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 11:05 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>>>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's bullshit.
>>>>>>>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>>>>>>> lose
>>>>>>>>> it or surrender it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is a lie.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's another lie. She wasn't under investigation or threat of
>>>>>>> prosecution for anything. Stop lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>>>
>>>>> No, she didn't. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>
>>> False.
>>>
>>
>> Well....ya never know...
>
> No, we *do* know - we know the claim that Michelle Obama "surrendered"
> her law license is debunked and discredited bullshit. *YOU* know it, too.

Sure is fun seeing you go apoplectic ;-)

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 2:15:53 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:00 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:41 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 10:38 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 11:30 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:20 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 11:05 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>>>>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>>>>>>>> lose
>>>>>>>>>> it or surrender it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is a lie.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's another lie. She wasn't under investigation or threat of
>>>>>>>> prosecution for anything. Stop lying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, she didn't. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>>
>>>> False.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well....ya never know...
>>
>> No, we *do* know - we know the claim that Michelle Obama "surrendered"
>> her law license is debunked and discredited bullshit. *YOU* know it, too.
>
> Sure is fun seeing you go apoplectic

You never saw that - it didn't happen.

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:25:35 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>
>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>
>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>> it or surrender it.
>>
> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid prosecution.

Bullshit. They are both in voluntary inactive status, which they chose
since they were busy with Obama's political campaign and then the
Presidency. This was a matter of practical convenience, NOT because of
any complaint, investigation, disciplinary matter or court order. They
are free to reactivate their law licenses any time they want to.

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:27:07 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 9:26 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>
>> So is her husband.
>
> Obama got caught practicing under a pseudonym.

Where do you nitwits come up with such bullshit? You're obviously far
too stupid to come up with it on your own.

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:32:54 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:26 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>>>
>>>> So is her husband.
>>>
>>> Obama got caught practicing under a pseudonym.
>>
>> That's another lie. Stop lying.
>>
>
>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>
>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>
>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
>> back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.” Sure, I saw this on the
>> front page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, “NOT.”
>> I’ve listed below from the State of Illinois’s website of the court
>> action against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It’s
>> understood that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance
>> – “No malpractice report required as attorney is under court order
>> inactive status.”
>> In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license
>> and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use
>> this word but its “rumored” that she was extorting clients. Again,
>> it’s “rumored!” It’s also “rumored” that our President Barack Obama
>> may have been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has
>> used in the past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive
>> Illinois license to practice law (listed below).
>> This is so unfortunate for the Obama’s, after all they are our first
>> family and he is the first black/white President of the United States
>> but I can’t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they
>> say they are. They don’t seem to uphold the integrity of our past
>> first families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
>> The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when
>> doing their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My
>> research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past
>> discretion’s and questionable acquaintances.
>> Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry
>> about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the
>> White House?
>> If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under
>> “Obama.” Bingo!
>> https://www.iardc.org/index.html
>>
>> LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY’S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
>> It’s quite revealing. LINK
>> http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/wtf-michell
>> In case readers are wondering….in 1992 Michelle Obama was still an
>> active member of illinois bar but had left sidley austin law firm to
>> go work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley in Chicago-she worked as
>> Daleys “assistant” for a year and a half-(that term drives me nuts but
>> that is how it is listed on her BIO–she was his “assistant…” thats a
>> FACT!now what does a harvard trained ‘assistant” do for the most
>> corrupt mayor and city gov in america…???after working in 1992 for
>> Daley…in 1993 she assumed a role in some community organziing venture
>> called PUBLIC ALLIES (another community organizer in the family?)my
>> smell test tells me as Daleys assistant…she was not always doing
>> something kosher…and in 1992 she was still member of the bar…perhaps
>> after her dealings with him and for him…she was CAUGHT doing some
>> shenigans…and was put on court ordered inactive status later in
>> 1993–after the issue was brought to the ADRC attention.seriously, it
>> is not a far stretch of the imagination to wo
> nder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
> ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him…that
> she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or
> worse…she did something illegal

The Obamas voluntarily placed their law licenses on inactive status, as
a matter of convenience only since he was running for office, and NOT as
the result of any disciplinary action or court order. They can
reactivate their licenses and go back to practicing law any time they want.

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:33:39 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>
>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>
>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>> it or surrender it.
>>
> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid prosecution.


Nope. The Obamas voluntarily placed their law licenses on inactive

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:34:28 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:59 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 10:54 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>
>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>
>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>
>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>
>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
>> back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.” Sure, I saw this on the
>> front page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, “NOT.”
>> I’ve listed below from the State of Illinois’s website of the court
>> action against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It’s
>> understood that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance
>> – “No malpractice report required as attorney is under court order
>> inactive status.”
>> In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license
>> and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use
>> this word but its “rumored” that she was extorting clients. Again,
>> it’s “rumored!” It’s also “rumored” that our President Barack Obama
>> may have been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has
>> used in the past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive
>> Illinois license to practice law (listed below).
>> This is so unfortunate for the Obama’s, after all they are our first
>> family and he is the first black/white President of the United States
>> but I can’t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they
>> say they are. They don’t seem to uphold the integrity of our past
>> first families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
>> The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when
>> doing their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My
>> research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past
>> discretion’s and questionable acquaintances.
>> Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry
>> about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the
>> White House?
>> If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under
>> “Obama.” Bingo!
>> https://www.iardc.org/index.html
>>
>> LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY’S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
>> In case readers are wondering….in 1992 Michelle Obama was still an
>> active member of illinois bar but had left sidley austin law firm to
>> go work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley in Chicago-she worked as
>> Daleys “assistant” for a year and a half-(that term drives me nuts but
>> that is how it is listed on her BIO–she was his “assistant…” thats a
>> FACT!now what does a harvard trained ‘assistant” do for the most
>> corrupt mayor and city gov in america…???after working in 1992 for
>> Daley…in 1993 she assumed a role in some community organziing venture
>> called PUBLIC ALLIES (another community organizer in the family?)my
>> smell test tells me as Daleys assistant…she was not always doing
>> something kosher…and in 1992 she was still member of the bar…perhaps
>> after her dealings with him and for him…she was CAUGHT doing some
>> shenigans…and was put on court ordered inactive status later in
>> 1993–after the issue was brought to the ADRC attention.seriously, it
>> is not a far stretch of the imagination to wo
> nder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
> ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him…that
> she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or
> worse…she did something illegal

�pam�u�ter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:34:55 PM9/4/12
to
"Randal Scripter" <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote in message
news:xoCdnS27ztlXuNvN...@giganews.com...
>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�


Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:34:59 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 11:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>>
>>>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>
>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>>>> it or surrender it.
>>>>
>>> The court ordered her to surrender it.
>>
>> That is a lie.
>>
>>
>>> She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>
>> That's another lie. She wasn't under investigation or threat of
>> prosecution for anything. Stop lying.
>
>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>
>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>
>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license

�pam�u�ter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:35:40 PM9/4/12
to
"meso-scalar" <pl...@ci.ty> wrote in message news:k25d9b$tsb$3...@dont-email.me...
> On 9/4/2012 11:05 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:35:35 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 12:20 PM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:06 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 9:59 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 10:54 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>>
>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>>
>>>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>
>> Wrong. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>
>
> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>
> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>
> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
> back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.” Sure, I saw this on the front
> page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, “NOT.” I’ve
> listed below from the State of Illinois’s website of the court action
> against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It’s understood
> that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance – “No
> malpractice report required as attorney is under court order inactive
> status.”
> In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license
> and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use
> this word but its “rumored” that she was extorting clients. Again, it’s
> “rumored!” It’s also “rumored” that our President Barack Obama may have
> been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has used in the
> past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive Illinois license
> to practice law (listed below).
> This is so unfortunate for the Obama’s, after all they are our first
> family and he is the first black/white President of the United States
> but I can’t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they
> say they are. They don’t seem to uphold the integrity of our past first
> families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
> The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when doing
> their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My
> research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past
> discretion’s and questionable acquaintances.
> Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry
> about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the
> White House?
> If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under
> “Obama.” Bingo!
> https://www.iardc.org/index.html
>
> LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY’S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
> In case readers are wondering….in 1992 Michelle Obama was still an
> active member of illinois bar but had left sidley austin law firm to go
> work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley in Chicago-she worked as
> Daleys “assistant” for a year and a half-(that term drives me nuts but
> that is how it is listed on her BIO–she was his “assistant…” thats a
> FACT!now what does a harvard trained ‘assistant” do for the most corrupt
> mayor and city gov in america…???after working in 1992 for Daley…in 1993
> she assumed a role in some community organziing venture called PUBLIC
> ALLIES (another community organizer in the family?)my smell test tells
> me as Daleys assistant…she was not always doing something kosher…and in
> 1992 she was still member of the bar…perhaps after her dealings with him
> and for him…she was CAUGHT doing some shenigans…and was put on court
> ordered inactive status later in 1993–after the issue was brought to the
> ADRC attention.seriously, it is not a far stretch of the imagination to
> wonder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
> ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him…that
> she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or
> worse…she did something illegal.

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:35:59 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 12:20 PM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:05 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>>>> lose
>>>>>> it or surrender it.
>>>>>>
>>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it.
>>>>
>>>> That is a lie.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>>>
>>>> That's another lie. She wasn't under investigation or threat of
>>>> prosecution for anything. Stop lying.
>>>
>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>
>> No, she didn't. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>
>
> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>
> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>
> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
> back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.” Sure, I saw this on the front
> page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, “NOT.” I’ve
> listed below from the State of Illinois’s website of the court action
> against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It’s understood
> that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance – “No
> malpractice report required as attorney is under court order inactive
> status.”
> In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license
> and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use
> this word but its “rumored” that she was extorting clients. Again, it’s
> “rumored!” It’s also “rumored” that our President Barack Obama may have
> been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has used in the
> past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive Illinois license
> to practice law (listed below).
> This is so unfortunate for the Obama’s, after all they are our first
> family and he is the first black/white President of the United States
> but I can’t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they
> say they are. They don’t seem to uphold the integrity of our past first
> families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
> The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when doing
> their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My
> research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past
> discretion’s and questionable acquaintances.
> Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry
> about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the
> White House?
> If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under
> “Obama.” Bingo!
> https://www.iardc.org/index.html
>
> LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY’S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
> In case readers are wondering….in 1992 Michelle Obama was still an
> active member of illinois bar but had left sidley austin law firm to go
> work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley in Chicago-she worked as
> Daleys “assistant” for a year and a half-(that term drives me nuts but
> that is how it is listed on her BIO–she was his “assistant…” thats a
> FACT!now what does a harvard trained ‘assistant” do for the most corrupt
> mayor and city gov in america…???after working in 1992 for Daley…in 1993
> she assumed a role in some community organziing venture called PUBLIC
> ALLIES (another community organizer in the family?)my smell test tells
> me as Daleys assistant…she was not always doing something kosher…and in
> 1992 she was still member of the bar…perhaps after her dealings with him
> and for him…she was CAUGHT doing some shenigans…and was put on court
> ordered inactive status later in 1993–after the issue was brought to the
> ADRC attention.seriously, it is not a far stretch of the imagination to
> wonder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
> ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him…that
> she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or

�pam�u�ter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:36:08 PM9/4/12
to


--
SPAMMED INTO NON-RELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT



"Mcafee" <blu...@porn.net> wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�


�pam�u�ter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:36:43 PM9/4/12
to


--
SPAMMED INTO NON-RELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT



"M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com> wrote in message news:k25ct3$r4k$1...@dont-email.me...
> "Mcafee" wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>
>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> > On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>> >> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>> >> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�
>> >
>> > It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>> >
>> > Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>> > it or surrender it.
>> >

�pam�u�ter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:37:07 PM9/4/12
to


--
SPAMMED INTO NON-RELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT



"Jeff M" <NoS...@NoThanks.org> wrote in message
news:CMadnWngg-AuyNvN...@giganews.com...

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:37:30 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 12:36 PM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:29 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 10:20 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 11:14 AM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:
>>>> "Mcafee" wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>> > On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>> >> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>> >> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>>> lose
>>>>> > it or surrender it.
>>>>> >
>>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid
>>>>> prosecution.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/
>>>>
>>>> "But the claim that the Obamas “surrendered” their licenses to avoid
>>>> ethics charges has no basis in fact."
>>>
>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>
>>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>
>> You keep repeating the same discredited debunked bullshit. It's still
>> bullshit. She did not "lose" or "surrender" her law license. It is in
>> inactive status.
>>
>> Stop lying, cocksucker.
>>
> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>
> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>
> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
> back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.” Sure, I saw this on the front
> page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, “NOT.” I’ve
> listed below from the State of Illinois’s website of the court action
> against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It’s understood
> that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance – “No
> malpractice report required as attorney is under court order inactive
> status.”
> In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license
> and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use
> this word but its “rumored” that she was extorting clients. Again, it’s
> “rumored!” It’s also “rumored” that our President Barack Obama may have
> been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has used in the
> past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive Illinois license
> to practice law (listed below).
> This is so unfortunate for the Obama’s, after all they are our first
> family and he is the first black/white President of the United States
> but I can’t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they
> say they are. They don’t seem to uphold the integrity of our past first
> families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
> The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when doing
> their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My
> research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past
> discretion’s and questionable acquaintances.
> Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry
> about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the
> White House?
> If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under
> “Obama.” Bingo!
> https://www.iardc.org/index.html
>
> LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY’S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
> In case readers are wondering….in 1992 Michelle Obama was still an
> active member of illinois bar but had left sidley austin law firm to go
> work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley in Chicago-she worked as
> Daleys “assistant” for a year and a half-(that term drives me nuts but
> that is how it is listed on her BIO–she was his “assistant…” thats a
> FACT!now what does a harvard trained ‘assistant” do for the most corrupt
> mayor and city gov in america…???after working in 1992 for Daley…in 1993
> she assumed a role in some community organziing venture called PUBLIC
> ALLIES (another community organizer in the family?)my smell test tells
> me as Daleys assistant…she was not always doing something kosher…and in
> 1992 she was still member of the bar…perhaps after her dealings with him
> and for him…she was CAUGHT doing some shenigans…and was put on court
> ordered inactive status later in 1993–after the issue was brought to the
> ADRC attention.seriously, it is not a far stretch of the imagination to
> wonder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
> ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him…that
> she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:39:06 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 12:38 PM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:30 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 10:20 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 11:05 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>>>>>> lose
>>>>>>>> it or surrender it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is a lie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's another lie. She wasn't under investigation or threat of
>>>>>> prosecution for anything. Stop lying.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>>
>>>> No, she didn't. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>
>>>
>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>
>> False.
>>
>
> Well....ya never know...

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:49:56 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 12:34 PM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:19 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 10:14 AM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:
>>> "Mcafee" wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>>>
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> > On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>> >> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>> >> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>> >
>>>> > It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>> >
>>>> > Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not
>>>> lose
>>>> > it or surrender it.
>>>> >
>>>> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid prosecution.
>>>
>>> http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/
>>>
>>> "But the claim that the Obamas “surrendered” their licenses to avoid
>>> ethics charges has no basis in fact."
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>> There are plenty of solid grounds for opposing Obama's reelection
>> without inventing crackpot irrelevant bullshit.
>>
>
> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>
> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>
> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
> back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.” Sure, I saw this on the front
> page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, “NOT.” I’ve
> listed below from the State of Illinois’s website of the court action
> against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It’s understood
> that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance – “No
> malpractice report required as attorney is under court order inactive
> status.”
> In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license
> and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use
> this word but its “rumored” that she was extorting clients. Again, it’s
> “rumored!” It’s also “rumored” that our President Barack Obama may have
> been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has used in the
> past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive Illinois license
> to practice law (listed below).
> This is so unfortunate for the Obama’s, after all they are our first
> family and he is the first black/white President of the United States
> but I can’t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they
> say they are. They don’t seem to uphold the integrity of our past first
> families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
> The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when doing
> their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My
> research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past
> discretion’s and questionable acquaintances.
> Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry
> about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the
> White House?
> If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under
> “Obama.” Bingo!
> https://www.iardc.org/index.html
>
> LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY’S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
> In case readers are wondering….in 1992 Michelle Obama was still an
> active member of illinois bar but had left sidley austin law firm to go
> work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley in Chicago-she worked as
> Daleys “assistant” for a year and a half-(that term drives me nuts but
> that is how it is listed on her BIO–she was his “assistant…” thats a
> FACT!now what does a harvard trained ‘assistant” do for the most corrupt
> mayor and city gov in america…???after working in 1992 for Daley…in 1993
> she assumed a role in some community organziing venture called PUBLIC
> ALLIES (another community organizer in the family?)my smell test tells
> me as Daleys assistant…she was not always doing something kosher…and in
> 1992 she was still member of the bar…perhaps after her dealings with him
> and for him…she was CAUGHT doing some shenigans…and was put on court
> ordered inactive status later in 1993–after the issue was brought to the
> ADRC attention.seriously, it is not a far stretch of the imagination to
> wonder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
> ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him…that
> she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or
> worse…she did something illegal.

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:54:03 PM9/4/12
to
But wait, there's more:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/was-communist-mentor-intimate-with-obamas-mother/

Was Obama�s goal in writing his autobiography, �Dreams from My Father,�
to misdirect Americans away from a deeply disturbing family background
and a Marxist political foundation?

These are questions filmmaker Joel Gilbert poses in the full-length
documentary �Dreams from My Real Father,� which argues Frank Marshall
Davis is the president�s biological father, not the Kenyan Barack Obama.

Gilbert reports he has recently discovered racy photos in vintage fetish
and bondage magazines of Obama�s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, that he
believes were taken by Davis. The photos, he says, bolster his belief
that Dunham had an intimate relationship with Davis.

Joel Gilbert�s �Dreams from My Real Father� is on sale now at WND�s
Superstore

Gilbert has given WND a preview of a new �Breaking News� page on his
documentary�s website titled �The Intimate Ann Dunham-Frank Marshall
Davis Relationship.� On the page, he presents a video that shows some of
the 30-plus pin-up photographs he believes Davis took of Obama�s young
mother and other models in his home at 2994 Kalihi Street in Honolulu,
Hawaii.

Frank Marshall Davis, pornographer

In 1968, Greenleaf Classics in San Diego published a pornographic novel
titled �Sex Rebel Black: Memoirs of a Gash Gourmet,� authored by �Bob
Greene,� a pen name Davis later admitted was his own.

In the sex novel that Davis claimed was autobiographical, he describes a
swinging lifestyle in which he and his wife had sex numerous times with
an underage girl named �Anne,� a figure very suggestive of Obama�s mother.

As Gilbert documents, Davis was a semi-professional photographer for
more than 30 years, beginning when he lived in Chicago. His specialty
was taking nude photographs of female models that he called �horizontal
cameos.�

In a collection of Davis poems published in a book titled �Black Moods,�
compiled by his biographer, University of Kansas English Professor John
Edgar Tidwell, are 37 written �portraits� grouped in a section subtitled
�Horizontal Cameos.� Each poem is dedicated to a different woman
identified only by her first name. The second poem is dedicated to
�Anne� and reads as follows:


Anne

In the gangling hours
Thin, adolescent hours
Before night runs softly
Away into the west
Anne rises wearily From her tired bed
And sleeps
Sitting in a chair.

In the three nude photographs initially discovered on the Internet in
2008, the young naked model is shown in a living room setting. She is
posing in or around a chair, with a Christmas tree and a 1950s Hi-Fi
with various jazz vinyl record albums in the background.

See Joel Gilbert�s video of his latest finds (Warning: Viewer discretion
advised. The video contains explicit images, with portions blacked out):



Gilbert also is the writer and director of the 2010 documentary film
�Atomic Jihad: Ahmadinejad�s Coming War and Obama�s Politics of Defeat.�

2994 Kalihi Street

Before releasing a small sample of the pin-up photographs he claims
shows a nude Ann Dunham posing for Davis, Gilbert undertook extensive
research.

He traveled to Hawaii to inspect and photograph the Honolulu address
that the FBI file documents as Davis� residence beginning in 1956. The
file shows he moved out in the late 1960s as he was beginning his
divorce from his wife, Helen Canfield Davis. The divorce was not
finalized until Sept. 30, 1969.

�The Davis house is an English Tudor architectural style dwelling, very
uncommon for the Hawaii islands,� Gilbert told WND. �There are no
similar houses in the neighborhood or anywhere else that I visited in
Hawaii.�

The current owner of the house gave Gilbert permission to enter,
photograph and document the house. �The flooring in the photos of Ann
stands out, as at first glance it appears to be expensive wood
flooring,� he said. �However, once inside the house and peeling away a
corner covered with layers of linoleum, I realized that it was a simple
piece of plywood that had been varnished.�

Gilbert found one complete original piece of plywood in a shed behind
the house that was an exact match to the flooring in the setting where
the �Ann Dunham and friends� pin-up photographs were taken.

Noteworthy also were the windows appearing in the pin-up photos. �The
windows in the living room of Frank�s house were tall and narrow � a
design unique to English Tudor style houses,� he noted.

�The windows at 2994 Kalihi Street appear to match the tall, narrow
windows with their bottom sill low to the floorboards seen in the pin-up
photos.�

Gilbert took measurements of the windows and the floor at various
angles, as well as video footage and still photographs of the living room.

As illustrated in his documentary, Gilbert found a newspaper photograph
of Davis sitting on a couch in his living room that appears to be an
exact match for the couch seen in the pin-up photographs.

Pin-up investigations

Gilbert also tracked down various living experts specializing in 1950s
pin-up photography. In the approximately 30 photographs Gilbert has
found of various models, including the model he has identified as
Dunham, some of the women were photographed alone and others with
another female model.

In some of the photos the models are nude, while others show them in
various costumes. Some scenes reflect bondage or other sadomasochistic
behavior.

Gilbert showed the photographs to Ira Klaw, a nephew of pin-up
photographer Irving Klaw. Ira was able to determine that Irving Klaw was
not the photographer � Irving Klaw did not take nude photographs of his
pin-up models.

Expert J.B. Rund agreed the models were not Klaw quality, but the photos
were not purely �amateur.� He explained that the photographer had the
sophistication to know how to use the same photo session to take two
types of photos that could be sold to two different types of
publications � fetish and full nude.

Gilbert explained to WND that neither Rund nor Ira Klaw recognized the
models or the location of the photo shoots. Rund concluded Gilbert�s
photographs had been taken by a semi-professional photographer who was
not purely amateur, a description that would fit Davis.

Gilbert found that several of the photos in the collection appeared in a
magazine called Exotique, published by pin-up photographer Leonard
Burtman, who worked in New York City.

Gilbert said he was able to establish that while Burtman took most of
the photographs appearing in Exotique, he also bought photographs for
Exotique from other photographers.

He has determined that the model he has identified as Ann Dunham appears
in Exotique, but he was unable to find any pin-up expert who could
identify the photographer, the models or the settings of the photographs
taken at what he assumes was the 2994 Kalihi Street location. �An
amateur pin-up photographer like Frank Marshall Davis would have been
paid about $4 per negative, while professional photographers were paid
by the hour,� Gilbert said.

�Later in his life, Frank Marshall Davis spoke about a publishing
venture he started that failed. My assumption is that Davis may have
tried to create his own fetish or nude magazine in Hawaii and that he
sold his photographs to others when the venture failed.�

Gilbert found the photographs he had collected appeared in a wide
variety of period fetish or nude magazines, including �Bizarre Life,�
�Battling Babes� and �Secret Pleasures.� They were all taken in the same
living room setting, with the narrow, low-to-the floor windows, the same
sitting chair and couch, and the same Hi-Fi with jazz records.

Several of the photographs also display a hand-written numbering system
that show up in white numbers and letters in the corner margins of the
pin-up photos, such as �YA-438.� �I was able to determine that Irving
Klaw used this numbering system, but it was not unique to Klaw, and it
was not created by Klaw,� Gilbert said. �Various pin-up photographers
used this numbering system to distinguish between photo shoots, portions
of shoots, models and to keep track of which photos were sold to which
publications. The numbers rarely stood for anything in particular.�

Regular visits to the Davis home

In his film, Gilbert documents that Ann Dunham gave her father, the
�Gramps� of Obama�s autobiography, instructions to make sure young Barry
would be taken regularly to visit Davis.

�Obama chronicles his childhood interaction with Frank Marshall Davis in
his autobiography by mentioning �Frank� 25 times, the only person Obama
refers to by using his real first name instead of a completely
fabricated pseudonym,� Gilbert stressed.

Neighbors of Davis have said Obama began visiting Davis every week at
his home from the time Obama was 10 years old.

Gilbert wonders why.

�As Ann Dunham engaged in nefarious activities with Frank Marshall
Davis, who was likely involved in pornography and prostitution, why
would she bring 10 year-old Barry back from Indonesia and tell her
father something to the effect of, �I�m going back to Indonesia, but
please take young Barry to Frank�s house a few times a week,�� he said.

The only scenario in which Obama�s regular visits as a child to Davis�
house would make sense, Gilbert said, is if Davis was the real
biological father
Gilbert explained that much of what Obama has told the American public
of his childhood has been proven false.

�We now know that the family did not stay together in Hawaii until 1962,
when the Kenyan Barack Obama went to Harvard to begin his graduate
studies as Obama claimed,� Gilbert explained. �Ann Dunham took her
infant son with her to Seattle a few weeks after his birth and began
studies at the University of Washington, while the Kenyan Obama remained
in Hawaii for another year before leaving for Harvard.�

The evidence, Gilbert said, �points to the conclusion that Ann Dunham�s
relationship with the Kenyan Obama was a �sham� marriage designed to
cover up an illicit affair with Frank Marshall Davis, in which the
infant had been conceived.�

Obama�s election was not a sudden political phenomenon, Gilbert maintains.

�It was the culmination of an American socialist movement that Frank
Marshall Davis nurtured in Chicago and Hawaii and has been quietly
infiltrating the U.S. economy, universities and media for decades,� he
said. �To understand Obama�s plans for America, look no further than
communist Frank Marshall Davis.�

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:54:21 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 1:25 PM, Jeff M wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�
>>>
>>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>
>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>>> it or surrender it.
>>>
>> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid prosecution.
>
> Bullshit. They are both in voluntary


Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:54:30 PM9/4/12
to
Michelle can, but Barry can't - he really did let his lapse completely.

Carol Kinsey Goman

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 3:58:47 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 12:54 PM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 1:27 PM, Jeff M wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 11:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:26 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>>>
>>>> So is her husband.
>>>
>>> Obama got caught practicing under a pseudonym.
>>
>> Where do you nitwits come up with such bullshit? You're obviously far
>> too stupid to come up with it on your own.
>
> But wait, there's more:
>
> http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/was-communist-mentor-intimate-with-obamas-mother/
>
>
> Was Obama’s goal in writing his autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,”
> to misdirect Americans away from a deeply disturbing family background
> and a Marxist political foundation?
>
> These are questions filmmaker Joel Gilbert poses in the full-length
> documentary “Dreams from My Real Father,” which argues Frank Marshall
> Davis is the president’s biological father, not the Kenyan Barack Obama.

Well, at least that settles Obama's citizenship status.

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 4:02:41 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 2:54 PM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 1:27 PM, Jeff M wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 11:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:26 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>>>
>>>> So is her husband.
>>>
>>> Obama got caught practicing under a pseudonym.
>>
>> Where do you nitwits come up with such bullshit? You're obviously far
>> too stupid to come up with it on your own.

Oh, WorldNetDaily. I see.
No, there isn't any more. You're just another of those pathetic "useful
idiots" doing the bidding of your masters in mindlessly regurgitating
the lies and hate you've been fed onto the infobahn.

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 4:04:18 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 2:54 PM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 1:25 PM, Jeff M wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 11:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.”
>>>>
>>>> It's bullshit.
>>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>>>
>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did
>>>> not lose it or surrender it.
>>>>
>>> The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid
>>> prosecution.
>>
>> Bullshit. They are both in voluntary
>
>
> But wait, there's more:

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 4:07:47 PM9/4/12
to
He retired from the bar, but he is eligible to "un-retire" if he ever
wants to. He might have to do more paperwork than Michelle would, or
even re-pass the bar exam, but there's nothing prohibiting from doing so.

Edward A. Falk

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 4:08:40 PM9/4/12
to
In article <xoCdnS27ztlXuNvN...@giganews.com>,
Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�

Of course you didn't, because it's not true. This crap has
already been brought up and debunked before.


>It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>
>Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>it or surrender it.


See also http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/

--
-Ed Falk, fa...@despams.r.us.com
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 4:36:34 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 2:08 PM, Edward A. Falk wrote:
> In article<xoCdnS27ztlXuNvN...@giganews.com>,
> Randal Scripter<kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
>>> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�
>
> Of course you didn't, because it's not true. This crap has
> already been brought up and debunked before.
>
>
>> It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>
>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
>> it or surrender it.
>
>
> See also

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/was-communist-mentor-intimate-with-obamas-mother/

Was Obama�s goal in writing his autobiography, �Dreams from My Father,�
to misdirect Americans away from a deeply disturbing family background
and a Marxist political foundation?

These are questions filmmaker Joel Gilbert poses in the full-length

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 4:36:52 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 2:07 PM, Jeff M wrote:
> He retired from the bar, but he is eligible to "un-retire"


meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 4:37:01 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 2:04 PM, Jeff M wrote:
> No, there isn't any more.


meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 4:37:21 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 2:02 PM, Jeff M wrote:
> No, there isn't any more.


meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 4:37:36 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 1:58 PM, Carol Kinsey Goman wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 12:54 PM, meso-scalar wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 1:27 PM, Jeff M wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 11:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:26 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>>>>
>>>>> So is her husband.
>>>>
>>>> Obama got caught practicing under a pseudonym.
>>>
>>> Where do you nitwits come up with such bullshit? You're obviously far
>>> too stupid to come up with it on your own.
>>
>> But wait, there's more:
>>
>> http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/was-communist-mentor-intimate-with-obamas-mother/
>>
>>
>>
>> Was Obama�s goal in writing his autobiography, �Dreams from My Father,�
>> to misdirect Americans away from a deeply disturbing family background
>> and a Marxist political foundation?
>>
>> These are questions filmmaker Joel Gilbert poses in the full-length
>> documentary �Dreams from My Real Father,� which argues Frank Marshall
>> Davis is the president�s biological father, not the Kenyan Barack Obama.
>
> Well, at least that settles Obama's citizenship status.
>
LOL!

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 4:38:09 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 1:54 PM, Randal Scripter wrote:
> he really did let his lapse completely.


http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/was-communist-mentor-intimate-with-obamas-mother/

Was Obama�s goal in writing his autobiography, �Dreams from My Father,�
to misdirect Americans away from a deeply disturbing family background
and a Marxist political foundation?

These are questions filmmaker Joel Gilbert poses in the full-length
documentary �Dreams from My Real Father,� which argues Frank Marshall
Davis is the president�s biological father, not the Kenyan Barack Obama.

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 4:38:33 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 1:39 PM, Jeff M wrote:
> They can reactivate their licenses


Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 5:01:02 PM9/4/12
to
But he doesn't have a law license, of any status.

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 5:03:00 PM9/4/12
to
Probably not. It depends on the particular rules of the Illinois Bar.

�ons@minority#s

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 5:12:19 PM9/4/12
to

"meso-scalar" <pl...@ci.ty> wrote in message news:k25oob$ak6$1...@dont-email.me...

Path: not-for-mail
From: meso-scalar <pl...@ci.ty>
Newsgroups:
alt.california,alt.politics.obama,can.politics,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking
Subject: Re: Why did Michell Obama lose her law license?
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:36:34 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 244
Message-ID: <k25oob$ak6$1...@dont-email.me>
References: <259fbf7cb540be4c...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
<xoCdnS27ztlXuNvN...@giganews.com> <k25n48$s45$1...@blue-new.rahul.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:36:28 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="a008c262c22722f64fac229cdfe9ed06";

logging-data="10886"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org <<
===============

"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/LVyR6GKEVmP9XtTPjs4vxiBi7PGru/hM="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.7) Gecko/20120824
Thunderbird/10.0.7
In-Reply-To: <k25n48$s45$1...@blue-new.rahul.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9uv3qx48YEy87KCCppjOdGIVnxU=
X-Received-Bytes: 12692
Xref: Hurricane alt.california:877173 alt.politics.obama:346856 can.politics:1421399
misc.survivalism:1045255 rec.crafts.metalworking:892085



�ons@minority#s

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 5:12:50 PM9/4/12
to

"Randal Scripter" <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote in message
news:uMadnUeGUuiS8dvN...@giganews.com...

�ons@minority#s

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 5:13:30 PM9/4/12
to

"Jeff M" <NoS...@NoThanks.org> wrote in message
news:tOudneAWjYAY8dvN...@giganews.com...

�p�m�uster

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 5:23:42 PM9/4/12
to


--
SPAMMED INTO NON-RELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT



"Carol Kinsey Goman" <ckg@f�rbes.com> wrote in message
news:gf2dnQFSAe_lwNvN...@giganews.com...


�p�m�uster

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 5:24:11 PM9/4/12
to


--
SPAMMED INTO NON-RELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT

"Edward A. Falk" <fa...@rahul.net> wrote in message news:k25n48$s45$1...@blue-new.rahul.net...
>>It's bullshit.


meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 6:54:18 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 3:12 PM, �ons@minority#s wrote:


CANADA, BRITISH COLUMBIA, NANAIMO
49.16634, -123.93601 (49�9'59"S -123�56'10"E)
SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.
SHAWCABLE.NET

35 Wharf St
Nanaimo, BC V9R, Canada


M.I.Wakefield

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 7:06:18 PM9/4/12
to
"Randal Scripter" wrote in message
news:uMadnUeGUuiS8dvN...@giganews.com...
Not active, no ... and it is remarkable how infrequently a sitting President
has to act as a lawyer.

Randal Scripter

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 8:33:15 PM9/4/12
to
He doesn't have any law license *at all*.

�ons@minority#s

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 9:17:56 PM9/4/12
to

"M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com> wrote in message news:k261hf$v8s$1...@dont-email.me...

�ons@minority#s

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 9:18:18 PM9/4/12
to

"Randal Scripter" <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote in message
news:w_6dnZh7Uf9QANvN...@giganews.com...

�p�m�uster

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 9:23:30 PM9/4/12
to


--
SPAMMED INTO NON-RELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT



Mcafee

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 10:31:35 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 10:05 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:26 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>>>>
>>>>> So is her husband.
>>>>
>>>> Obama got caught practicing under a pseudonym.
>>>
>>> That's another lie. Stop lying.
>>>
>>
>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>
>>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>>
>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
>>> back in 1993?
>
> It's a lie: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp


Right, Snopes. What a crock of left wing shit. Michelled surrendered her
license to avoid prosecution.


Mcafee

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 10:32:35 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 12:54 PM, Randal Scripter wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 12:32 PM, Jeff M wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 11:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:26 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So is her husband.
>>>>>
>>>>> Obama got caught practicing under a pseudonym.
>>>>
>>>> That's another lie. Stop lying.
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>>
>>>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>>>
>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
>>>> back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.� Sure, I saw this on the
>>>> front page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, �NOT.�
>>>> I�ve listed below from the State of Illinois�s website of the court
>>>> action against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It�s
>>>> understood that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance
>>>> � �No malpractice report required as attorney is under court order
>>>> inactive status.�
>>>> In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license
>>>> and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use
>>>> this word but its �rumored� that she was extorting clients. Again,
>>>> it�s �rumored!� It�s also �rumored� that our President Barack Obama
>>>> may have been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has
>>>> used in the past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive
>>>> Illinois license to practice law (listed below).
>>>> This is so unfortunate for the Obama�s, after all they are our first
>>>> family and he is the first black/white President of the United States
>>>> but I can�t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they
>>>> say they are. They don�t seem to uphold the integrity of our past
>>>> first families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
>>>> The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when
>>>> doing their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My
>>>> research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past
>>>> discretion�s and questionable acquaintances.
>>>> Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry
>>>> about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the
>>>> White House?
>>>> If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under
>>>> �Obama.� Bingo!
>>>> https://www.iardc.org/index.html
>>>>
>>>> LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY�S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
>>>> It�s quite revealing. LINK
>>>> http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/wtf-michell�
>>>> In case readers are wondering�.in 1992 Michelle Obama was still an
>>>> active member of illinois bar but had left sidley austin law firm to
>>>> go work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley in Chicago-she worked as
>>>> Daleys �assistant� for a year and a half-(that term drives me nuts but
>>>> that is how it is listed on her BIO�she was his �assistant�� thats a
>>>> FACT!now what does a harvard trained �assistant� do for the most
>>>> corrupt mayor and city gov in america�???after working in 1992 for
>>>> Daley�in 1993 she assumed a role in some community organziing venture
>>>> called PUBLIC ALLIES (another community organizer in the family?)my
>>>> smell test tells me as Daleys assistant�she was not always doing
>>>> something kosher�and in 1992 she was still member of the bar�perhaps
>>>> after her dealings with him and for him�she was CAUGHT doing some
>>>> shenigans�and was put on court ordered inactive status later in
>>>> 1993�after the issue was brought to the ADRC attention.seriously, it
>>>> is not a far stretch of the imagination to wo
>>> nder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
>>> ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with him�that
>>> she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or
>>> worse�she did something illegal
>>
>> The Obamas voluntarily placed their law licenses on inactive status, as
>> a matter of convenience only since he was running for office, and NOT as
>> the result of any disciplinary action or court order. They can
>> reactivate their licenses and go back to practicing law any time they
>> want.
>
> Michelle can, but Barry can't - he really did let his lapse completely.
>
Michelle can't practice because her surrender was court ordered to avoid
prosecution.

M.I.Wakefield

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 10:48:26 PM9/4/12
to
"Mcafee" wrote in message news:k26dk4$m7$5...@wieslauf.sub.de...

> Michelle can't practice because her surrender was court ordered to avoid
> prosecution.

Illinois has since changed the law; court approval to go on "inactive
status" is no longer required.

Feel free to provide the evidence for your assertion that her actions were
anything less than voluntary.

Gunner

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 10:51:27 PM9/4/12
to
Indeed.

Snopes has a very poor track record. Anyone who doesnt believe
this...should review Obamas mothers porn photos article that was
clearly marked False by Snopes rebuttle...and oddly enough...now no
longer exists. Rather fascinating how they occasionally show their far
leftwing bias..and then go into unexplained meltdown when the facts of
the matter show them to be...far leftwing extremists

Perhaps not as far Leftwing extremist as the current DNC...but way way
left of center.

Gunner




"The U.S. military has had considerably more success in turning Iraq
around than liberals have had in turning the ghettos around with their
40-year 'War on Poverty.' So far, fewer troops have been killed by
hostile fire since the end of major combat in Iraq than civilians were
murdered in Washington, DC, last year (239 deaths in Iraq compared to
262 murders in DC.) Ann Coulter

George Plimpton

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 11:04:11 PM9/4/12
to
Nope. They debunk bullshit irrespective of politics.


> Michelled surrendered her license to avoid prosecution.

Bullshit. Complete bullshit.

�p�m�uster

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 11:04:26 PM9/4/12
to


--
SPAMMED INTO NON-RELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT



"M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com> wrote in message news:k26ehv$38o$1...@dont-email.me...


George Plimpton

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 11:05:35 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 7:32 PM, Mcafee wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 12:54 PM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 12:32 PM, Jeff M wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 11:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:26 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So is her husband.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Obama got caught practicing under a pseudonym.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's another lie. Stop lying.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>>>
>>>>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
>>>>> back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, “NOT.” Sure, I saw this on the
>>>>> front page of the New York Times during the elections of 2008, “NOT.”
>>>>> I’ve listed below from the State of Illinois’s website of the court
>>>>> action against Michelle forcing her to give up her license. It’s
>>>>> understood that in the box attacked below under Malpractice Insurance
>>>>> – “No malpractice report required as attorney is under court order
>>>>> inactive status.”
>>>>> In other words Michelle was under court order to give up her license
>>>>> and is not allowed to practice law in Illinois, period. I hate to use
>>>>> this word but its “rumored” that she was extorting clients. Again,
>>>>> it’s “rumored!” It’s also “rumored” that our President Barack Obama
>>>>> may have been disciplined for not divulging other names that he has
>>>>> used in the past. That really concerns me. He also has an inactive
>>>>> Illinois license to practice law (listed below).
>>>>> This is so unfortunate for the Obama’s, after all they are our first
>>>>> family and he is the first black/white President of the United States
>>>>> but I can’t stop thinking that this guy and his wife are not who they
>>>>> say they are. They don’t seem to uphold the integrity of our past
>>>>> first families, yes, even Richard Nixon for all you lefties out there.
>>>>> The more I find on the Obamas, the more I feel that the FBI when
>>>>> doing their background check must have been sleeping at the switch. My
>>>>> research is finding reputable sources disclosing many of their past
>>>>> discretion’s and questionable acquaintances.
>>>>> Obamas background is questionable enough but do we now have to worry
>>>>> about his wife, also? My god do we have a den of thieves living in the
>>>>> White House?
>>>>> If you want to check yourself, here is the link and just search under
>>>>> “Obama.” Bingo!
>>>>> https://www.iardc.org/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>> LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY’S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
>>>>> It’s quite revealing. LINK
>>>>> http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/wtf-michell
>>>>> In case readers are wondering….in 1992 Michelle Obama was still an
>>>>> active member of illinois bar but had left sidley austin law firm to
>>>>> go work for mayor daley YES that Mayor Daley in Chicago-she worked as
>>>>> Daleys “assistant” for a year and a half-(that term drives me nuts but
>>>>> that is how it is listed on her BIO–she was his “assistant…” thats a
>>>>> FACT!now what does a harvard trained ‘assistant” do for the most
>>>>> corrupt mayor and city gov in america…???after working in 1992 for
>>>>> Daley…in 1993 she assumed a role in some community organziing venture
>>>>> called PUBLIC ALLIES (another community organizer in the family?)my
>>>>> smell test tells me as Daleys assistant…she was not always doing
>>>>> something kosher…and in 1992 she was still member of the bar…perhaps
>>>>> after her dealings with him and for him…she was CAUGHT doing some
>>>>> shenigans…and was put on court ordered inactive status later in
>>>>> 1993–after the issue was brought to the ADRC attention.seriously, it
>>>>> is not a far stretch of the imagination to wo
>>>> nder if MO was working for Daley in 1992 and her license went on COURT
>>>> ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS soon after her connection and work with
>>>> him…that
>>>> she is not guilty of SOMETHING unethical (which is all it needs) or
>>>> worse…she did something illegal
>>>
>>> The Obamas voluntarily placed their law licenses on inactive status, as
>>> a matter of convenience only since he was running for office, and NOT as
>>> the result of any disciplinary action or court order. They can
>>> reactivate their licenses and go back to practicing law any time they
>>> want.
>>
>> Michelle can, but Barry can't - he really did let his lapse completely.
>>
> Michelle can't practice because her surrender was court ordered to avoid
> prosecution.

Complete bullshit. She did not "surrender" her law license, and she did
not face any threat of prosecution. Her license is in inactive status.
You're a lying cunt.

�ons@minority#s

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 11:06:30 PM9/4/12
to
GONE

"Mcafee" <blu...@porn.net> wrote in message news:k26di8$m7$4...@wieslauf.sub.de...


George Plimpton

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 11:06:41 PM9/4/12
to
On 9/4/2012 7:51 PM, Gunner wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:31:35 -0700, Mcafee <blu...@porn.net> wrote:
>
>> On 9/4/2012 10:05 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:57 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:52 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:44 AM, Mcafee wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 9:26 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/4/2012 10:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
>>>>>>>> Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So is her husband.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Obama got caught practicing under a pseudonym.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's another lie. Stop lying.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Michelle Obama Loses Law License
>>>>>
>>>>> http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/01/who-is-michelle-obama.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law license
>>>>> back in 1993?
>>>
>>> It's a lie: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
>>
>>
>> Right, Snopes. What a crock of left wing shit. Michelled surrendered her
>> license to avoid prosecution.
>>
> Indeed.
>
> Snopes has a very poor track record.

They do not. They have an excellent record. They are quite justly seen
as authoritative. They do careful research, and they talk with original
sources most of the time.

�ons@minority#s

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 11:06:56 PM9/4/12
to

"M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com> wrote in message news:k26ehv$38o$1...@dont-email.me...

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 12:20:07 AM9/5/12
to
On 9/4/2012 9:06 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> Snopes has a very poor track record.
>
> They do not. They have an excellent record.

Nope.

They have lied.

http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=20022

Yes, we are in big, big trouble as a country. Because all those
liberals/Dems/progressives/marxists/America haters have been working

to control all messages in our country. They lie. They twist. They
support union and racial (black) violence and thuggery... They HATE.

And they work to turn everything we believe in as a country, turn it
upside down and inside out. And they bought off so much of the media.

This is a serious case of the latter being a major problem. They want
our gov to provide gov funds for the wanton murder of children, born and
unborn,

they want marriage to be NOT what it really is, they want anyone richer
or happier than them to be poor as them, and unhappy as them.

They will ignore black and union violence and threats, and go berserk
condemning all whites and conversatives and all Republicans if just one

mental case commits violence.

It's all in slanting a false reality to manipulate voters. In the last
election, it worked. It can't work again - the truth is finally out.
********************
Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court's Kagan

We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes!
Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at
some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya'?

We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to
be financed by Soros!
Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros; a big time supporter of Obama!

In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on
many occasions.
I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme
Court Justice, Elena Kagan who Obama appointed and Snopes said the email
was false and there were no such dockets so I Googled the Supreme Court,
typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what?
Yep you got it; Snopes Lied!
Everyone of those dockets are there.
So Here is what I wrote toSnopes:
Referencing the article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:
The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as
claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false.
I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and
immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made
reference to.
I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really
shocking.
Thank You, I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I
doubt it.
That being said, Ill bet you didn't know this.
Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship.
Now she may help rule on them.
Folks, this is really ugly.
Chicago Politics; and the beat goes on and on and on.
Once again the US Senate sold us out!
Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.
Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.
She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with
the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship.
He owed her big time.
All of the requests were denied of course.
They were never heard.
It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it?
The American people mean nothing any longer.
It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to
elect someone who really has no true right to even be there.
Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket:
You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?
Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!
Check out these examples:
http://www.supremeco...les/09-8857.htm
http://www.supremeco...les/09-6790.htm
http://www.supremeco...iles/09-724.htm
If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.
However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S.
Constitution; by all means, PASS it ON!
There truly is tyranny afoot.

George Plimpton

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 12:33:14 AM9/5/12
to
On 9/4/2012 9:20 PM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 9:06 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>> Snopes has a very poor track record.
>>
>> They do not. They have an excellent record.
>
> Nope.
>
> They have lied.

No, they have never lied. They have got a few minor things wrong, but
they have never lied.

Gunner

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 3:08:24 AM9/5/12
to
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:48:26 -0400, "M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com>
wrote:

>"Mcafee" wrote in message news:k26dk4$m7$5...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>
>> Michelle can't practice because her surrender was court ordered to avoid
>> prosecution.
>
>Illinois has since changed the law; court approval to go on "inactive
>status" is no longer required.


"Since changed the law":

Thats a fascinating way to attempt to hide her losing her liscense

M.I.Wakefield

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 8:02:49 AM9/5/12
to
"Gunner" wrote in message
news:mhud48pci6hmmhrvv...@4ax.com...

> Thats a fascinating way to attempt to hide her losing her liscense

Voluntarily became inactive because she wasn't going to be practicing law
... which means lower fees to the State Bar, no need for malpractice
insurance, and no continuing education requirements.

Because she became inactive under the old law, which required petitioning
the court, she would have to go back to court to reactivate her licence. In
the same circumstances today, a lawyer just has to notify the Illinois State
Bar.

And still waiting for any evidence for your assertion.

Jack Skolasky

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 9:56:28 AM9/5/12
to
On 9/5/2012 12:08 AM, Gunner wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:48:26 -0400, "M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "Mcafee" wrote in message news:k26dk4$m7$5...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>>
>>> Michelle can't practice because her surrender was court ordered to avoid
>>> prosecution.
>>
>> Illinois has since changed the law; court approval to go on "inactive
>> status" is no longer required.
>
>
> "Since changed the law":
>
> Thats a fascinating way to attempt to hide her losing her liscense

She didn't "lose" her license; she put it on inactive status. No court
"ordered" her to give up her license; the order was issued to the state
bar to put the license on inactive status, *at her request*.

meso-scalar

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 12:14:12 PM9/5/12
to

George Plimpton

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 12:21:13 PM9/5/12
to
On 9/5/2012 9:14 AM, meso-scalar wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 10:33 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 9:20 PM, meso-scalar wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2012 9:06 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>> Snopes has a very poor track record.
>>>>
>>>> They do not. They have an excellent record.
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>>
>>> They have lied.
>>
>> No, they have never lied. They have got a few minor things wrong, but
>> they have never lied.
>>
>
>
> Nope.
>
> They have lied.

No, they have not.

George Plimpton

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 12:26:33 PM9/5/12
to
On 9/5/2012 9:12 AM, Steve B wrote:
> "Jack Skolasky" <kick.d...@SouthTeats.con> wrote in message
> news:uYCdnYqMMcSSx9rN...@giganews.com...
> Sounds like she was given the opportunity to resign on her own, therefore
> saving a lot of time and money and embarrassment.

She didn't "resign" from anything. She wasn't going to be "embarrassed"
by anything pertaining to her bar membership. She chose to put her law
license in inactive status because she wasn't going to be working as a
lawyer.

There is no sinister or unflattering explanation behind any of this.
People who believe there is are irrational fuckwits.

Edward A. Falk

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 2:32:26 PM9/5/12
to
In article <k26di8$m7$4...@wieslauf.sub.de>, Mcafee <blu...@porn.net> wrote:
>
>Right, Snopes. What a crock of left wing shit.

People keep saying that, but whenever they do, further investigation
shows that Snopes was right. I'm aware of very few things they've
gotten wrong, and nobody's ever been able to point to anything that
looks like a deliberate lie.

This is one of the cases where the facts back up Snopes.

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/

--
-Ed Falk, fa...@despams.r.us.com
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/

�p�m�uster

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 2:43:33 PM9/5/12
to
--
SPAMMED INTO NON-RELEVANT NEWSGROUPS - AND CUT

"Edward A. Falk" <fa...@rahul.net> wrote in message news:k285rq$tdv$1...@blue-new.rahul.net...


Michael A. Terrell

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 6:23:12 PM9/5/12
to

"M.I.Wakefield" wrote:
>
> "Mcafee" wrote in message news:k25b4i$ber$3...@wieslauf.sub.de...
>
> > On 9/4/2012 9:01 AM, Randal Scripter wrote:
> > > On 9/4/2012 8:29 AM, Harry Reid Truth Center wrote:
> > >> Did you know that our First Lady Michelle Obama lost her law
> > >> license back in 1993? Oh sure I knew that, �NOT.�
> > >
> > > It's bullshit. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp
> > >
> > > Michelle Obama's law license is in "inactive" status; she did not lose
> > > it or surrender it.
> > >
> > The court ordered her to surrender it. She did so to avoid prosecution.
>
> http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/
>
> "But the claim that the Obamas �surrendered� their licenses to avoid ethics
> charges has no basis in fact."


It means they have no ethics...

�ons@minority#s

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 6:31:02 PM9/5/12
to

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.t...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:W4qdnUb6m9BGTdrN...@earthlink.com...


George Plimpton

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 11:34:36 PM9/5/12
to
It means they didn't "surrender" their licenses, and it means their
licenses were not subject to any challenge at all.

Jeff M

unread,
Sep 6, 2012, 10:13:08 AM9/6/12
to
On 9/5/2012 1:32 PM, Edward A. Falk wrote:
> In article <k26di8$m7$4...@wieslauf.sub.de>, Mcafee <blu...@porn.net> wrote:
>>
>> Right, Snopes. What a crock of left wing shit.
>
> People keep saying that, but whenever they do, further investigation
> shows that Snopes was right. I'm aware of very few things they've
> gotten wrong, and nobody's ever been able to point to anything that
> looks like a deliberate lie.
>
> This is one of the cases where the facts back up Snopes.
>
> http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/

They aren't really attacking Snopes or other fact-checking cites. They
are attacking truth itself. Their objective is to subordinate objective
reality itself to their political dogma. To do this, they need to
essentially obliterate objective reality, or at least make it totally
impossible for anyone to determine what the state of objective reality
actually is.

It is necessary for them that mass confusion and ignorance reign, since
that is a prerequisite to the continued existence of the alternate
reality where most rightards currently reside, a comforting place for
them, but one composed of equal parts outright lies, partisan propaganda
and utter nonsense. Under these circumstances, the truth is a threat,
and and must be battled constantly until completely defeated.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages