Al-Qaeda linked to failed Detroit plane attack
HH&C
with explosives.
How does this happen???
Al-Qaeda linked to failed Detroit plane attack
By J.P. Karas, AP
A Northwest Airlines passenger landing in Detroit on Friday tried to
blow up the flight but the explosive device failed, two U.S. national
security officials said. Authorities initially believed the passenger
had set off firecrackers that caused some minor injuries.
A Northwest Airlines passenger from Nigeria, who said he was acting on
al-Qaeda's instructions, tried to blow up the plane today as it was
landing in Detroit, law enforcement and national security officials
said.
A senior U.S. counterterror official says a passenger aboard a Delta
Air Lines flight in Detroit was planning to blow up the plane but the
explosive device failed, the Associated Press reported today.
Passengers subdued the man and may have prevented him from detonating
the explosives, the officials said.
A White House official said the incident was an attempted act of
terrorism.
Federal officials imposed stricter screening measures after the
incident.
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., ranking GOP member of the House Homeland
Security Committee, identified the suspect as Abdul Mudallad, a
Nigerian. King said the flight began in Nigeria and went through
Amsterdam en route to Detroit. There were 278 passengers aboard the
Airbus 330.
There was nothing out of the ordinary until the flight was on final
approach to Detroit, said Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman
Elizabeth Isham Cory.
That is when the pilot declared an emergency and landed without
incident shortly thereafter, Cory said in an e-mail message. The plane
landed at 11:51 a.m.
One of the U.S. intelligence officials said the explosive device was a
mix of powder and liquid. It failed when the passenger tried to
detonate it.
The counterterror official said the passenger was being questioned
this evening.
The passenger created a disturbance by lighting what was reported to
be firecrackers — or perhaps a "powdery substance" — onboard the
flight, injuring himself and several other passengers, according to
Delta Airlines
FBI spokeswoman Sandra Berchtold confirmed today that agents are at
Metro.
MORE: Michigan man provides details of attempted flight attack
The man was apparently already on the government's no-fly list of
suspected terrorists, ABC News said a senior intelligence official
told them.
President Obama was notified of the incident and discussed it with
security officials, the White House said. It said he is monitoring the
situation and receiving regular updates from his vacation spot in
Hawaii.
One passenger from the flight was taken to the University of Michigan
Medical Center in Ann Arbor, hospital spokeswoman Tracy Justice said.
She would not say what the injuries were.
Because Delta Airlines in Detroit did not handle security for the
flight, Elliott said she could not answer how the items that were
ignited got on the plane.
She said Delta has a hub in Amsterdam and this one was among several
flights today.
Security precautions raised in wake of attempted attack
The Homeland Security Department said passengers may see additional
screening measures on domestic and international flights because of
the incident.
"We encourage those with future travel plans to stay in touch with
their airline and to visit www.tsa.gov for updates," the department
said.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has been briefed on the
incident and is closely monitoring the situation.
The department encouraged travelers to be observant and aware of their
surroundings and report any suspicious behavior to law enforcement
officials.
Lib Loo
"HH&C" <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:af0633f7-03d4-4281...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> with explosives.
>
> How does this happen???
Bush fooled Obama again?
> be firecrackers � or perhaps a "powdery substance" � onboard the
HH&C
> "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:af0633f7-03d4-4281...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>
> > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> > with explosives.
>
> > How does this happen???
>
> Bush fooled Obama again?
Bush is amazing. He can probably throw his voice, too, making us
think that Obama said something intelligent.
Dan
> While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> with explosives.
>
> How does this happen???
The same way any other two unconnected but simultaneous coincidental
occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently, they
are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
Dan
HH&C
What we have here is an Obama apologist.
How does someone on the NO-FLY list get on a commercial flight???
How does someone on the NO-FLY list get on a commercial flight WITH
EXPLOSIVES???
You say it is a coincidence?
Will Obama say it is a police matter?
Iarnrod
> On Dec 26, 3:12 pm, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > HH&C wrote:
> > > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> > > with explosives.
>
> > > How does this happen???
>
> > The same way any other two unconnected but simultaneous coincidental
> > occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently, they
> > are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
>
> > Dan
>
> What we have here is an Obama apologist.
What we have here is an extreme sufferer of Obama Derangement
Syndrome.
> How does someone on the NO-FLY list get on a commercial flight???
He was not on a no-fly list, dearie. Keep your ODS medication handy.
> You say it is a coincidence?
>
> Will Obama say it is a police matter?
It is.
WWAD? (What Would AWOL Do?) Invade Nigeria?
HH&C
> On Dec 26, 2:39 pm, "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 26, 3:12 pm, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > HH&C wrote:
> > > > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> > > > with explosives.
>
> > > > How does this happen???
>
> > > The same way any other two unconnected but simultaneous coincidental
> > > occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently, they
> > > are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
>
> > > Dan
>
> > What we have here is an Obama apologist.
>
> What we have here is an extreme sufferer of Obama Derangement
> Syndrome.
>
> > How does someone on the NO-FLY list get on a commercial flight???
>
> He was not on a no-fly list, dearie. Keep your ODS medication handy.
The article I cited says he was.
"The man was apparently already on the government's no-fly list of
suspected terrorists, ABC News said a senior intelligence official
told them."
> > You say it is a coincidence?
>
> > Will Obama say it is a police matter?
>
> It is.
>
> WWAD? (What Would AWOL Do?) Invade Nigeria?
So the man is on the No-Fly list and he goes through security and
boards the plane.
And the man on the No-Fly list goes through security with Explosives
and he boards the plane.
And the man on the No-Fly list doesn't try to detonate the explosives
in Amsterdam or enroute, but waits until he is in America to do it.
And the man on the No-Fly list was subdued by Passengers because the
Netherlands doesn't allow US Marshalls on flights originating there.
And the man on the No-Fly list has Al Qaida connections.
And who in the Netherlands has been arrested for allowing this to
happen?
And in the White House is demanding that Air Marshalls be on flights
from the Netherlands with a USA destination?
Unlike Dan, I don't believe this is a coincidence. Obama didn't have
his eye on the ball. He was on vacation.
HH&C
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:12:28 -0800, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >HH&C wrote:
> >> While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> >> with explosives.
>
> >> How does this happen???
>
> >The same way any other two unconnected
>
>
> So President Zero has absolutely nothing to do with airline security?
>
> >but simultaneous coincidental
> >occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently, they
> >are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
>
> crap just happens in a vacuum. Interesting division of
> responsibility. It's getting almost Bush like. Bush was a victim you
> know - all those American haters that wanted him to fail. Sounds like
> President 0 is becoming one too.
Obama still has most of the media behind him. Bush had very little of
that from day one.
Lib Loo
"HH&C" <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:67efa81c-71c4-41f4...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
Typical Chicago style. Mayor Daley would also disappear just before
something would happen, then return with the excuse, "What, me? I was on
vacation!" He learns well and fast.
Lib Loo
"HH&C" <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:49be6398-962b-4d3a...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
He probably had some response all planned, how he had to come off his
vacation to deal with it. He's probably mad the powder got wet.
Lib Loo
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:9m9dj5l1bn02m6n3i...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:12:28 -0800, Dan <dnad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>HH&C wrote:
>
>>> While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
>>> with explosives.
>>>
>>> How does this happen???
>>
>>The same way any other two unconnected
>
> Unconnected ?????
>
> So President Zero has absolutely nothing to do with airline security?
>
>>but simultaneous coincidental
>>occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently, they
>>are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
>
> In your world, Obama is responsible for anything good and then the
> crap just happens in a vacuum. Interesting division of
> responsibility. It's getting almost Bush like. Bush was a victim you
> know - all those American haters that wanted him to fail. Sounds like
> President 0 is becoming one too.
>
That sounds a bit loony, the Bush part.
Iarnrod
> On Dec 26, 4:48 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 26, 2:39 pm, "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 26, 3:12 pm, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > HH&C wrote:
> > > > > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> > > > > with explosives.
>
> > > > > How does this happen???
>
> > > > The same way any other two unconnected but simultaneous coincidental
> > > > occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently, they
> > > > are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
>
> > > > Dan
>
> > > What we have here is an Obama apologist.
>
> > What we have here is an extreme sufferer of Obama Derangement
> > Syndrome.
>
> > > How does someone on the NO-FLY list get on a commercial flight???
>
> > He was not on a no-fly list, dearie. Keep your ODS medication handy.
>
> The article I cited says he was.
So now you believe everything you see on the teevee?
BWAHAHAHAAAAA!!!! You're a dope. You're unaware that ABC has spent
every story today correcting its error? Multiple sources have
confirmed the man was NOT on a no-fly list.
So try to keep up even if you're going to be insanely stupid, eh,
dearie?
> > > You say it is a coincidence?
>
> > > Will Obama say it is a police matter?
>
> > It is.
>
> > WWAD? (What Would AWOL Do?) Invade Nigeria?
>
> So the man is on the No-Fly list and he goes through security and
> boards the plane.
Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
> And the man on the No-Fly list goes through security with Explosives
> and he boards the plane.
Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
> And the man on the No-Fly list doesn't try to detonate the explosives
> in Amsterdam or enroute, but waits until he is in America to do it.
Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
> And the man on the No-Fly list was subdued by Passengers because the
> Netherlands doesn't allow US Marshalls on flights originating there.
Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
> And the man on the No-Fly list has Al Qaida connections.
Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
> And who in the Netherlands has been arrested for allowing this to
> happen?
Let's wait until Obama, who saved the day once again, gets to the
bottom of it.
> And in the White House is demanding that Air Marshalls be on flights
> from the Netherlands with a USA destination?
>
> Unlike Dan, I don't believe this is a coincidence. Obama didn't have
> his eye on the ball. He was on vacation.
He saved the day.
You ODS sufferers just can't stand having effective smart intelligent
leaders, can you.
HH&C
> "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Always keep your powder dry.
Stupid shit needs to be sent back to Jihadist 101. Better yet,
Remedial Jihadist 095.
Now about our allies in the Netherlands that let this asshole on a
plane with explosives.
Now I hear that Congress is going to form a committee to get to the
bottom of this...
HH&C
> On Dec 26, 3:23 pm, "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 26, 4:48 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 26, 2:39 pm, "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 26, 3:12 pm, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > HH&C wrote:
> > > > > > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> > > > > > with explosives.
>
> > > > > > How does this happen???
>
> > > > > The same way any other two unconnected but simultaneous coincidental
> > > > > occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently, they
> > > > > are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
>
> > > > > Dan
>
> > > > What we have here is an Obama apologist.
>
> > > What we have here is an extreme sufferer of Obama Derangement
> > > Syndrome.
>
> > > > How does someone on the NO-FLY list get on a commercial flight???
>
> > > He was not on a no-fly list, dearie. Keep your ODS medication handy.
>
> > The article I cited says he was.
>
> So now you believe everything you see on the teevee?
Huh? USA Today is on TV??? That will sure save them a lot of news
print, won't it?
> BWAHAHAHAAAAA!!!! You're a dope. You're unaware that ABC has spent
> every story today correcting its error? Multiple sources have
> confirmed the man was NOT on a no-fly list.
>
> So try to keep up even if you're going to be insanely stupid, eh,
> dearie?
I'll accept being corrected. You did have a cite, didn't you?
> > > > You say it is a coincidence?
>
> > > > Will Obama say it is a police matter?
>
> > > It is.
>
> > > WWAD? (What Would AWOL Do?) Invade Nigeria?
>
> > So the man is on the No-Fly list and he goes through security and
> > boards the plane.
>
> Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
>
> > And the man on the No-Fly list goes through security with Explosives
> > and he boards the plane.
>
> Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
>
> > And the man on the No-Fly list doesn't try to detonate the explosives
> > in Amsterdam or enroute, but waits until he is in America to do it.
>
> Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
>
> > And the man on the No-Fly list was subdued by Passengers because the
> > Netherlands doesn't allow US Marshalls on flights originating there.
>
> Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
>
> > And the man on the No-Fly list has Al Qaida connections.
>
> Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
>
> > And who in the Netherlands has been arrested for allowing this to
> > happen?
>
> Let's wait until Obama, who saved the day once again, gets to the
> bottom of it.
Obama was on VACATION. Obama is still on VACATION.
Some passengers saved the day.
Why did Obama agree with the Netherlands to NOT allow US Marshalls on
flights entering the USA???
Screw that. End flights in/out of the Netherlands with a USA origin
or destination.
> > And in the White House is demanding that Air Marshalls be on flights
> > from the Netherlands with a USA destination?
>
> > Unlike Dan, I don't believe this is a coincidence. Obama didn't have
> > his eye on the ball. He was on vacation.
>
> He saved the day.
He did nothing.
> You ODS sufferers just can't stand having effective smart intelligent
> leaders, can you.
I just wish Bush could throw his voice like a ventriloquist so that it
would appear Obama was saying something half-way intelligent.
HH&C
> "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Yep, and he has Lamerod offering apologies.
HH&C
> >HH&C wrote:
> >> While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> >> with explosives.
>
> >> How does this happen???
>
> >The same way any other two unconnected
>
Ask if the purple kool-aid was delicious.
> So President Zero has absolutely nothing to do with airline security?
The buck stopped with some passengers who decided it wasn't their day
to die.
Obama allowed the Netherlands to dictate when Obama can use a US
Marshall.
And somebody in the Netherlands airport security let this guy get on
that plane with explosives.
> >but simultaneous coincidental
> >occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently, they
> >are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
>
> In your world, Obama is responsible for anything good and then the
> crap just happens in a vacuum. Interesting division of
> responsibility. It's getting almost Bush like. Bush was a victim you
> know - all those American haters that wanted him to fail. Sounds like
> President 0 is becoming one too.
If only Bush could throw his voice like a ventriloquist people would
think Obama was saying something half-way intelligent.
Lib Loo
"HH&C" <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5a9b82d9-5b69-49a2...@a6g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
Why was he so late flying here from Copenhagen? Was he delayed by the
snowstorm?
HH&C
> "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 26, 7:14 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:12:28 -0800, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >HH&C wrote:
> >> >> While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> >> >> with explosives.
>
> >> >> How does this happen???
>
> >> >The same way any other two unconnected
>
> >> Unconnected ?????
>
> >Ask if the purple kool-aid was delicious.
>
> >> So President Zero has absolutely nothing to do with airline security?
>
> >The buck stopped with some passengers who decided it wasn't their day
> >to die.
>
> >Obama allowed the Netherlands to dictate when Obama can use a US
> >Marshall.
>
> >And somebody in the Netherlands airport security let this guy get on
> >that plane with explosives.
>
> that's the kinder, gentler thing to do. I'm sure we will all be safer
> because President Zero is a wuss.
Ummm, NO.
> As long as some hot shot seal doesn't get in the act.
But they had to ask 17 times to pull the trigger.
HH&C
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:12:28 -0800, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Pentagon got a big hole in it? It was part of a plan orchestrated by
> someone that Bush had taken off the radar as a potential terrorist
> probably because his daddy had done business with the terrorist in the
> past with good results. Granted the terrorist was terrorizing the
> Soviet Union back then.
>
> Cheese was good with that though.
Just coincidences, according to Dan.
Iarnrod
> On Dec 26, 10:46 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 26, 3:23 pm, "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 26, 4:48 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 26, 2:39 pm, "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 26, 3:12 pm, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > HH&C wrote:
> > > > > > > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> > > > > > > with explosives.
>
> > > > > > > How does this happen???
>
> > > > > > The same way any other two unconnected but simultaneous coincidental
> > > > > > occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently, they
> > > > > > are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
>
> > > > > > Dan
>
> > > > > What we have here is an Obama apologist.
>
> > > > What we have here is an extreme sufferer of Obama Derangement
> > > > Syndrome.
>
> > > > > How does someone on the NO-FLY list get on a commercial flight???
>
> > > > He was not on a no-fly list, dearie. Keep your ODS medication handy.
>
> > > The article I cited says he was.
>
> > So now you believe everything you see on the teevee?
>
> Huh? USA Today is on TV??? That will sure save them a lot of news
> print, won't it?
Holy cow, I knew I was dealing here with a moron, but I didn't realize
until NOW that you were also an imbecile of the highest proportion.
You didn't even READ your own citation!!!
Holy shit, YOU DIDN'T EVEN READ YOUR OWN CITATION!??!?!
BWAHAAAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAAA!!!!!!
The USA Today story attributed the "no-fly list" info to ABC News in
the very cut-and paste you did in the original post, you fuckin'
knuckle dragging loser.
YOU DIDN'T EVEN READ YOUR OWN CITATION! BWAHAHAHHAAAAAA!!!!
> > BWAHAHAHAAAAA!!!! You're a dope. You're unaware that ABC has spent
> > every story today correcting its error? Multiple sources have
> > confirmed the man was NOT on a no-fly list.
>
> > So try to keep up even if you're going to be insanely stupid, eh,
> > dearie?
>
> I'll accept being corrected.
That sounds like something you have to confront every single day of
your stupid kooker life, dearie.
> You did have a cite, didn't you?
BWAHAAAHAHAAAHHAHAHAAAAA!!!! You LOSER!!!! Click on the original link
in your very first post, idiot. THAT'S my cite!! USA Today has
corrected it, again based on ABC News. Even your own link now
contradicts your stupid ass!!!
Gotta love these conservaloons!!!
Go ahead, go back and click on your original link.
I do so love kicking stupid rightard asses like this!
> > > > > You say it is a coincidence?
>
> > > > > Will Obama say it is a police matter?
>
> > > > It is.
>
> > > > WWAD? (What Would AWOL Do?) Invade Nigeria?
>
> > > So the man is on the No-Fly list and he goes through security and
> > > boards the plane.
>
> > Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
>
> > > And the man on the No-Fly list goes through security with Explosives
> > > and he boards the plane.
>
> > Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
>
> > > And the man on the No-Fly list doesn't try to detonate the explosives
> > > in Amsterdam or enroute, but waits until he is in America to do it.
>
> > Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
>
> > > And the man on the No-Fly list was subdued by Passengers because the
> > > Netherlands doesn't allow US Marshalls on flights originating there.
>
> > Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
>
> > > And the man on the No-Fly list has Al Qaida connections.
>
> > Nope. He was not on a no-fly list.
>
> > > And who in the Netherlands has been arrested for allowing this to
> > > happen?
>
> > Let's wait until Obama, who saved the day once again, gets to the
> > bottom of it.
>
> Obama was on VACATION. Obama is still on VACATION.
And even from vacation he was able to prevent anotehr terrorist
attack!
THANK YOU PRESIDENT OBAMA!!
And thank you, HH&C, for pointing out how competent Obama is to be
able to do this while even on vacation!
> Some passengers saved the day.
>
> Why did Obama agree with the Netherlands to NOT allow US Marshalls on
> flights entering the USA???
>
> Screw that. End flights in/out of the Netherlands with a USA origin
> or destination.
>
> > > And in the White House is demanding that Air Marshalls be on flights
> > > from the Netherlands with a USA destination?
>
> > > Unlike Dan, I don't believe this is a coincidence. Obama didn't have
> > > his eye on the ball. He was on vacation.
>
> > He saved the day.
>
> He did nothing.
Nothing except saving the day!
> > You ODS sufferers just can't stand having effective smart intelligent
> > leaders, can you.
>
> I just wish Bush could throw his voice like a ventriloquist so that it
> would appear Obama was saying something half-way intelligent.
Holy SHIT!!! Now we KNOW you're a dope. AWOL never said an intelligent
thing in his stupid life!
Q.E.D., kook.
Iarnrod
BWAHAHAHAAAA!!!! Apologies for skill, competence, results,
intelligence? Are you longing for the days of AWOL and his
incompetence?
HH&C
So you're back for more? Welp, I'm not going to give it to you.
Troll somewhere else, asshole. I suggest Argentina.
HH&C
Do you think Obama will check himself into the Betty Ford clinic
before the end of 2010?
Iarnrod
Yes, I wish to kick your stupid kooker ass a bit more. Thanks for
bending over, rightard! You make it easy!
> Troll somewhere else, asshole.
ESAD, kookshit.
> I suggest Argentina.
Isn't that your home, Goebbels?
Iarnrod
Why do you hate America?
Hey, by the way, kooker, where's your apology for not even reading
your own fuckin' CITATION!! Un-fuckin-believable that I quoted to you
from YOUR OWN CITE, and you demanded my source!! BWAHAAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
Typical rightard!!
knews4...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
They always have to correct their lies.
It was first reported that he was on the No-fly list.
http://www.newworldorderreport.com/Articles/tabid/266/ID/744/Confirmed-Sharp-dressemd-man-aided-Northwest-flight-Christmas-Bomber-Umar-Mutallab-onto-plane-without-passport-Who-was-involved-why-dont-we-know-about-this-other-suspect.aspx
Lib Loo
<knews4...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4d0c4b87-d9a6-4760...@c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
HH&C
The Betty Ford clinic is the very best. It shows that I care.
> Hey, by the way, kooker, where's your apology for not even reading
> your own fuckin' CITATION!! Un-fuckin-believable that I quoted to you
> from YOUR OWN CITE, and you demanded my source!! BWAHAAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
> Typical rightard!!
USA Today is not television. It is news print.
The fact that USA Today quoted a source at a television station does
not make USA Today television.
Can you understand this, Lamerod?
Iarnrod
I know that, knowsknothing. That's what the moron failed to check out.
But even worse, HH&C didn't even read his own citation to realize thet
USA Today did not source the original incorrect info... it quoted ABC
News. Then he had the gall to question me when I said ABC News had
corrected it. A true rightarded moron.
Iarnrod
How long were you there, addict?
> > Hey, by the way, kooker, where's your apology for not even reading
> > your own fuckin' CITATION!! Un-fuckin-believable that I quoted to you
> > from YOUR OWN CITE, and you demanded my source!! BWAHAAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
> > Typical rightard!!
>
> USA Today is not television. It is news print.
OMG!!! OMFG!!! You STILL didn't go back and read YOUR OWN CITE!??!
Too fuckin' funny!!
> The fact that USA Today quoted a source at a television station does
> not make USA Today television.
>
> Can you understand this, Lamerod?
Holy shit, you don't get the concept of USA Today quoting ABC News?
Wow, and I thought rightards were dumb. this is dumber than dumb!
Thanks for the midday laugh!!!
HH&C
I'm afraid that the best I could hope for would be a VA clinic
somewhere, if I were to ever have an addiction.
But Obama? Definitely the Betty Ford Clinic.
> > > Hey, by the way, kooker, where's your apology for not even reading
> > > your own fuckin' CITATION!! Un-fuckin-believable that I quoted to you
> > > from YOUR OWN CITE, and you demanded my source!! BWAHAAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
> > > Typical rightard!!
>
> > USA Today is not television. It is news print.
>
> OMG!!! OMFG!!! You STILL didn't go back and read YOUR OWN CITE!??!
>
> Too fuckin' funny!!
May I suggest that you go back and read my own cite.
> > The fact that USA Today quoted a source at a television station does
> > not make USA Today television.
>
> > Can you understand this, Lamerod?
>
> Holy shit, you don't get the concept of USA Today quoting ABC News?
I'm quite aware of the concept, and quite certain that you are still
wrong.
> Wow, and I thought rightards were dumb. this is dumber than dumb!
It's OK. We all make mistakes. Consider it a character flaw on your
part.
> Thanks for the midday laugh!!!
You're quite welcome, Lamerod.
Iarnrod
Then why did you say you went to the Betty Ford Clinic, liar.\
> I'm afraid that the best I could hope for would be a VA clinic
> somewhere, if I were to ever have an addiction.
You do. Glue-sniffing, I'd say.
You have to be a veteran to use the VA, poser.
> But Obama? Definitely the Betty Ford Clinic.
For what? Do you imagine all people have addictions like yours?
> > > > Hey, by the way, kooker, where's your apology for not even reading
> > > > your own fuckin' CITATION!! Un-fuckin-believable that I quoted to you
> > > > from YOUR OWN CITE, and you demanded my source!! BWAHAAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
> > > > Typical rightard!!
>
> > > USA Today is not television. It is news print.
>
> > OMG!!! OMFG!!! You STILL didn't go back and read YOUR OWN CITE!??!
>
> > Too fuckin' funny!!
>
> May I suggest that you go back and read my own cite.
BWAHHAHAAAAA!!! May *I* suggest you fuckin' read yours to begin
with!!! I PROVED you didn't read it. You didn't even know that the
info, eventually shown to be false, that the suspect was on the no-fly
list did NOT come from USA Today but from ABC News. Then instead of
reading your own cite, you tried to weasel your way out by making a
joke that only showed what a bird brained nitwit you are. Too funny!
> > > The fact that USA Today quoted a source at a television station does
> > > not make USA Today television.
>
> > > Can you understand this, Lamerod?
>
> > Holy shit, you don't get the concept of USA Today quoting ABC News?
>
> I'm quite aware of the concept, and quite certain that you are still
> wrong.
Then I not only suggest but strongly urge you to read your own cite
for the first time, bozo. It proves me right and you wrong. The info
came from ABC News. Q.E. fuckin' D., fuzznuts.
> > Wow, and I thought rightards were dumb. this is dumber than dumb!
>
> It's OK. We all make mistakes. Consider it a character flaw on your
> part.
Correcting you lying rightards is now a character flaw? Only on the
loony right, I suppose!
> > Thanks for the midday laugh!!!
>
> You're quite welcome, Lamerod.
You were better than Maury's guests!
HH&C
You must have had very permissive parents. They've raised a monster.
Iarnrod
Stop trying to divert from my ass-kicking of your stupid kooker
rightarded ass, moron.
YOU DIDN'T EVEN READ YOUR OWN CITE!!!
You were caught like a deer in the headlights when I said "ABC News"
had corrected its information -- you didn't even fuckin' know what I
was talking about... yet it was FROM YOUR OWN CITE!!!
BWAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAAAA!!!!!!
Your OWN LINK went to USA Today's updated version that showed I was
right and you were wrong!
I mean, this is HUGELY embarrassing even for a moron like you who is
obviously put down and embarrassed every single day of your stupid
kooker life!!
Let me relish this a bit longer before you run away, kookboi!!
> They've raised a monster.
Pfffff, your parents raised a fuckin' moron.
HH&C
> Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Your OWN LINK went to USA Today's updated version that showed I was
> >right and you were wrong!
>
> the case of breaking news the link target probably changes hourly.
> Two people can click the same link hours or days apart and get totally
> different information.
Here is the entire body of the article with the link. It is included
in the first posting in this thread.
Notice that it is an AP article, picked up by USA Today.
Lamerod says it is TeeVee, only because he is stupid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-12-25-airliner-disturbanc...
Al-Qaeda linked to failed Detroit plane attack
By J.P. Karas, AP
A Northwest Airlines passenger landing in Detroit on Friday tried to
blow up the flight but the explosive device failed, two U.S. national
security officials said. Authorities initially believed the passenger
had set off firecrackers that caused some minor injuries.
A Northwest Airlines passenger from Nigeria, who said he was acting
on
al-Qaeda's instructions, tried to blow up the plane today as it was
landing in Detroit, law enforcement and national security officials
said.
A senior U.S. counterterror official says a passenger aboard a Delta
Air Lines flight in Detroit was planning to blow up the plane but the
explosive device failed, the Associated Press reported today.
Passengers subdued the man and may have prevented him from detonating
the explosives, the officials said.
A White House official said the incident was an attempted act of
terrorism.
Federal officials imposed stricter screening measures after the
incident.
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., ranking GOP member of the House Homeland
Security Committee, identified the suspect as Abdul Mudallad, a
Nigerian. King said the flight began in Nigeria and went through
Amsterdam en route to Detroit. There were 278 passengers aboard the
Airbus 330.
There was nothing out of the ordinary until the flight was on final
approach to Detroit, said Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman
Elizabeth Isham Cory.
That is when the pilot declared an emergency and landed without
incident shortly thereafter, Cory said in an e-mail message. The
plane
landed at 11:51 a.m.
One of the U.S. intelligence officials said the explosive device was
a
mix of powder and liquid. It failed when the passenger tried to
detonate it.
The counterterror official said the passenger was being questioned
this evening.
The passenger created a disturbance by lighting what was reported to
be firecrackers — or perhaps a "powdery substance" — onboard the
flight, injuring himself and several other passengers, according to
Delta Airlines
FBI spokeswoman Sandra Berchtold confirmed today that agents are at
Metro.
MORE: Michigan man provides details of attempted flight attack
The man was apparently already on the government's no-fly list of
suspected terrorists, ABC News said a senior intelligence official
told them.
President Obama was notified of the incident and discussed it with
security officials, the White House said. It said he is monitoring
the
situation and receiving regular updates from his vacation spot in
Hawaii.
One passenger from the flight was taken to the University of Michigan
Medical Center in Ann Arbor, hospital spokeswoman Tracy Justice said.
She would not say what the injuries were.
Because Delta Airlines in Detroit did not handle security for the
flight, Elliott said she could not answer how the items that were
ignited got on the plane.
She said Delta has a hub in Amsterdam and this one was among several
flights today.
Security precautions raised in wake of attempted attack
The Homeland Security Department said passengers may see additional
screening measures on domestic and international flights because of
the incident.
"We encourage those with future travel plans to stay in touch with
their airline and to visit www.tsa.gov for updates," the department
said.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has been briefed on the
incident and is closely monitoring the situation.
The department encouraged travelers to be observant and aware of
their
surroundings and report any suspicious behavior to law enforcement
officials.
Iarnrod
> >right and you were wrong!
>
No shit, Sherlock. That's the point here. Did you take a stupid pill
today?
> The target can be changed at any time.
Exactamente. That is what I am pointing out to your comrade-in-
stupidity. When he posted it, it quoted ABC News as saying the suspect
was on the no-fly list. ABC later found out this was not the case, and
reported dutifully so, whereupon USA Today ran a writethru story with
the new info that he was NOT on the no-fly list.
The issue with your stupid friend here is that he didn't realize the
info even came form ABC News in the first place. He thought USA Today
had done the reporting on it, so when I told him ABC had corrected its
mistake, he stupidly tried to make fun of his intellectual better and
he has been dancing around like Fred Astaire ever since, trying to
evade his stupid mistake.
> In
> the case of breaking news the link target probably changes hourly.
> Two people can click the same link hours or days apart and get totally
> different information.
That's why I told him to check his own cite. No matter, he even got
the ORIGINAL wrong because he didn't realize it was ABC News reporting
the no-fly list information, not USA Today, which only passed it on.
HTH, Winnie the Poop!
Iarnrod
> On Dec 28, 7:36 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote:
>
> > Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >Your OWN LINK went to USA Today's updated version that showed I was
> > >right and you were wrong!
>
> > Links are dynamic things. The target can be changed at any time. In
> > the case of breaking news the link target probably changes hourly.
> > Two people can click the same link hours or days apart and get totally
> > different information.
>
> Here is the entire body of the article with the link. It is included
> in the first posting in this thread.
>
> Notice that it is an AP article, picked up by USA Today.
>
> Lamerod says it is TeeVee, only because he is stupid.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-12-25-airliner-disturbanc...
>
> Al-Qaeda linked to failed Detroit plane attack
>
> By J.P. Karas, AP
OMG!! OMFG!!!
You incredible nitwit!!! I cannot BELIEVE you are poking your head up
again for me to pick off so easily.
READ THIS PART THAT IS INCLUDED IN YOUR ORIGINAL POST:
"The man was apparently already on the government's no-fly list of
suspected terrorists, ABC News said a senior intelligence official
told them."
Have Winnie The Poop, who apparently knows how news organizations
operate even if he is a boob otherwise, explain this to you.
It is ABC News that reported the no-fly list angle; not AP, not USA
Today. They merely aggregated info from various attributed other news
sources. ABC then corrected its mistake.
YOU FAILED TO PICK THAT UP THEN, and you FAIL to pick it up now. You
have GOT to be the densest moron whose ass I have kicked all week.
Un-fuckin-believeable, kooker.
Tell us, when did ABC News start printing a daily newspaper? <snicker>
You are w-a-a-a-a-y beyond stupid. This is MONSTROUSLY stupid on your
part. I mean, I have shoved this fact so far deep into your stupid
kooker ass that it MUST have reached your head by now, since that's
where you apparently keep your head.
Lib Loo
"Iarnrod" <iar...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:945027f3-6cc7-4b0e...@22g2000yqr.googlegroups.com...
Looks like USA Today, not TeeVee. We have some lovely parting gifts for you
backstage.
knews4...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/abdulmutallab-yemen/story?id=9430536
If explosives must explode.....
How is it that the explosives in his pants became "incendiaries?"
But Lamerod says "explosives must explode."
Guess that makes her full of shit.
Iarnrod
> Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 28, 5:36 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote:
> >> Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >Your OWN LINK went to USA Today's updated version that showed I was
> >> >right and you were wrong!
>
> >> Links are dynamic things.
>
> >No shit, Sherlock. That's the point here. Did you take a stupid pill
> >today?
>
I said stupid pill, stupid. Thanks for proving my point.
Iarnrod
> "Iarnrod" <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Ummm, Toilet Boy, READ the story, then come crawling back hoping I
won't kick your stupid kooker ass again.
I can't believe you rightarded lemmings. I mean, I pointed out HHC's
kooker mistake, and you come rushing right in picking up where he fell
on his face. Too funny!
Iarnrod
BWAHAAAHAHAHAAAA!!!! Knowsknothing needs her ass kicked again!!!
Idiot, PETN is an explosive but it will burn if it is set on fire. If
it burns, it does not bring down 110-story skyscrapers.
Have you actually dedicated your entire life to being a dimwitted
rightarded asshole?
You're now saying PETN brought down the WTC!! BWAHAAAHHAHAHAAAA!!!
knews4...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
Nope.
Just saying the same thing all along.
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
HH&C
Welp, Lamerod, you seem to be the odd man out here. That's OK. Being
the odd man out doesn't make you wrong.
What makes you wrong is being wrong. Learn the difference between
attribution and citation. And have a nice day.
Iarnrod
So now you're contradicting your new false and disproven claim by
citing your old false and disproven claim!
BWAHAAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
Iarnrod
> On Dec 28, 10:06 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 28, 6:20 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote:
>
> > > Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >On Dec 28, 5:36 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote:
> > > >> Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >> >Your OWN LINK went to USA Today's updated version that showed I was
> > > >> >right and you were wrong!
>
> > > >> Links are dynamic things.
>
> > > >No shit, Sherlock. That's the point here. Did you take a stupid pill
> > > >today?
>
> > > I read some of your posts. Does that count?
>
> > I said stupid pill, stupid. Thanks for proving my point.
>
> Welp, Lamerod, you seem to be the odd man out here.
Huh? WTF? Are you sniffing glue, kook?
I am proven correct BY YOUR VERY CITE that you stupidly continue to
contest!! Too funny!! READ YOUR CITE!!! This is un-fuckin-believable!!
Read these words FROM YOUR VERY FIRST POST, SHITHEAD:
"The man was apparently already on the government's no-fly list of
suspected terrorists, ABC News said a senior intelligence official
told them."
You "think" ABC News is a newspaper? You think USA Today is ABC News?
You're fuckin' insane, which of course is a prerequisite for being a
rightard!
Run away now, proven kook!!
BWAHAHHAHAHAHAAAA!!!! Asswipe rightard can't even read his own cite!
Can't understand the difference between USA Today -- a newspaper --
and ABC News, a broadcast TV network!!
No wonder you morons are losing ground!!!
HH&C
Son, maybe I was being a little too hard on you, what with you being a
product of the public education system and all. Get yourself into one
of those evening classes for adults and get your GED. Best of Luck.
Iarnrod
Son?? WTF?? I am old enough to be your grandmother, you stupid shit.
> maybe I was being a little too hard on you,
BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA!!! No, dearie, you made it wa-a-a-a-a-y too easy to
kick your stupid kooker ass by FAILING to read your own cite!! I wiped
the floor here with you!!
ABC News is not a newspaper, sweetheart. Learn something before you
embarrass yourself further.
> what with you being a
> product of the public education system and all.
BWAHAHHAHAA!!! Hey short bus rider, I never set foot in a public
school in my life. you OTOH never set foot in ANY school in your life
since you think a newspaper is a television! BWAHAHAHHAAAHAHAAA!!!
> Get yourself into one
> of those evening classes for adults and get your GED. Best of Luck.
False bravado from a proven nitwit who FAILED to read his own cite and
didn't realize HIS OWN CITE proved me right! Q.E.D!
Observer
<hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 25, 10:05 pm, "Lib Loo" <heezb...@crazymother.kom> wrote:
>> "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:af0633f7-03d4-4281...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
>> > with explosives.
>>
>> > How does this happen???
>>
>> Bush fooled Obama again?
>
>Bush is amazing. He can probably throw his voice, too, making us
>think that Obama said something intelligent.
If he couild do that, he'd have done it while he was still president.
__
The last official act of any government is the looting of the nation.
Observer
<hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 26, 10:46 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 26, 3:23 pm, "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Dec 26, 4:48 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Dec 26, 2:39 pm, "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > On Dec 26, 3:12 pm, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > HH&C wrote:
>> > > > > > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
>> > > > > > with explosives.
>>
>> > > > > > How does this happen???
>>
>> > > > > The same way any other two unconnected but simultaneous coincidental
>> > > > > occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently, they
>> > > > > are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
>>
>> > > > > Dan
>>
>> > > > What we have here is an Obama apologist.
>>
>> > > What we have here is an extreme sufferer of Obama Derangement
>> > > Syndrome.
>>
>> > > > How does someone on the NO-FLY list get on a commercial flight???
>>
>> > > He was not on a no-fly list, dearie. Keep your ODS medication handy.
>>
>> > The article I cited says he was.
>>
>> So now you believe everything you see on the teevee?
>
>Huh? USA Today is on TV??? That will sure save them a lot of news
>print, won't it?
>
>> BWAHAHAHAAAAA!!!! You're a dope. You're unaware that ABC has spent
>> every story today correcting its error? Multiple sources have
>> confirmed the man was NOT on a no-fly list.
>>
>> So try to keep up even if you're going to be insanely stupid, eh,
>> dearie?
>
>I'll accept being corrected. You did have a cite, didn't you?
You most assuredly DO NOT accept being corrected. Your nose is still
firmly up my ass after I corrected you on your FDR claim.
Observer
<hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 26, 9:59 pm, "Lib Loo" <heezb...@crazymother.kom> wrote:
>> "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:49be6398-962b-4d3a...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 26, 4:48 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> On Dec 26, 2:39 pm, "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 26, 3:12 pm, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > HH&C wrote:
>> >> > > > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
>> >> > > > with explosives.
>>
>> >> > > > How does this happen???
>>
>> >> > > The same way any other two unconnected but simultaneous coincidental
>> >> > > occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently,
>> >> > > they
>> >> > > are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
>>
>> >> > > Dan
>>
>> >> > What we have here is an Obama apologist.
>>
>> >> What we have here is an extreme sufferer of Obama Derangement
>> >> Syndrome.
>>
>> >> > How does someone on the NO-FLY list get on a commercial flight???
>>
>> >> He was not on a no-fly list, dearie. Keep your ODS medication handy.
>>
>> > The article I cited says he was.
>>
>> > "The man was apparently already on the government's no-fly list of
>> > suspected terrorists, ABC News said a senior intelligence official
>> > told them."
>>
>> >> > You say it is a coincidence?
>>
>> >> > Will Obama say it is a police matter?
>>
>> >> It is.
>>
>> >> WWAD? (What Would AWOL Do?) Invade Nigeria?
>>
>> > So the man is on the No-Fly list and he goes through security and
>> > boards the plane.
>>
>> > And the man on the No-Fly list goes through security with Explosives
>> > and he boards the plane.
>>
>> > And the man on the No-Fly list doesn't try to detonate the explosives
>> > in Amsterdam or enroute, but waits until he is in America to do it.
>>
>> > And the man on the No-Fly list was subdued by Passengers because the
>> > Netherlands doesn't allow US Marshalls on flights originating there.
>>
>> > And the man on the No-Fly list has Al Qaida connections.
>>
>> > And who in the Netherlands has been arrested for allowing this to
>> > happen?
>>
>> > And in the White House is demanding that Air Marshalls be on flights
>> > from the Netherlands with a USA destination?
>>
>> > Unlike Dan, I don't believe this is a coincidence. Obama didn't have
>> > his eye on the ball. He was on vacation.
>>
>> He probably had some response all planned, how he had to come off his
>> vacation to deal with it. He's probably mad the powder got wet.
>
>Always keep your powder dry.
>
>Stupid shit needs to be sent back to Jihadist 101. Better yet,
>Remedial Jihadist 095.
So... Have you registered for the class, yet? So far the class is
empty. You wouldn't want some poor Iraqi instructor to go unpaid, eh?
>Now about our allies in the Netherlands that let this asshole on a
>plane with explosives.
They let you on a plane with explosives?
>Now I hear that Congress is going to form a committee to get to the
>bottom of this...
Cite?
Observer
<hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 27, 12:29 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 26, 9:10 pm, "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 26, 9:58 pm, "Lib Loo" <heezb...@crazymother.kom> wrote:
>>
>> > > "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> > >news:67efa81c-71c4-41f4...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > > > On Dec 26, 3:12 pm, Dan <dnada...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> HH&C wrote:
>> > > >> > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
>> > > >> > with explosives.
>>
>> > > >> > How does this happen???
>>
>> > > >> The same way any other two unconnected but simultaneous coincidental
>> > > >> occurrences happen. These things are a part of reality; evidently, they
>> > > >> are NOT a part of your fantastical made-up world.
>>
>> > > >> Dan
>>
>> > > > What we have here is an Obama apologist.
>>
>> > > > How does someone on the NO-FLY list get on a commercial flight???
>>
>> > > > How does someone on the NO-FLY list get on a commercial flight WITH
>> > > > EXPLOSIVES???
>>
>> > > > You say it is a coincidence?
>>
>> > > > Will Obama say it is a police matter?
>>
>> > > Typical Chicago style. Mayor Daley would also disappear just before
>> > > something would happen, then return with the excuse, "What, me? I was on
>> > > vacation!" He learns well and fast.
>>
>> > Yep, and he has Lamerod offering apologies.
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAAAA!!!! Apologies for skill, competence, results,
>> intelligence? Are you longing for the days of AWOL and his
>> incompetence?
>
>Do you think Obama will check himself into the Betty Ford clinic
>before the end of 2010?
There's a higher probability you would do so.
BTW, still waiting for you remove your nose from my ass WRT your FDR
claim.
Observer
wrote:
>Why do you hate America?
By definition. Neocons Hate America.
>Hey, by the way, kooker, where's your apology for not even reading
>your own fuckin' CITATION!! Un-fuckin-believable that I quoted to you
>from YOUR OWN CITE, and you demanded my source!! BWAHAAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
>Typical rightard!!
Cheese-Bob lies. Even if it is a simple matter of misunderstanding,
he'll keep perpetuating his views after being shown different. ergo,
turning misconceptions into perpetuating lies. It's pathological.
And sometimes fun to watch.
knews4...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
You are lost as usual.
Iarnrod
Your content-less surrender is accepted, knowsknothing! Game, set and
match go to me!
PETN cannot bring down towers. There were no explosives going off at
collapse initiation. Controlled demolition has absolutely been proven
to be a complete physical impossibility.
HH&C
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:28:51 -0800 (PST), "HH&C"
>
> >On Dec 25, 10:05 pm, "Lib Loo" <heezb...@crazymother.kom> wrote:
> >> "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:af0633f7-03d4-4281...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
> >> > with explosives.
>
> >> > How does this happen???
>
> >> Bush fooled Obama again?
>
> >Bush is amazing. He can probably throw his voice, too, making us
> >think that Obama said something intelligent.
>
> If he couild do that, he'd have done it while he was still president.
How do you think Obama got elected?
knews4...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
You are still lost.
You are claiming that I claimed something I did not.
You are a twisted liar.
HH&C
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:10:12 -0800 (PST), "HH&C"
>
>
>
>
>
Why do you love what FDR did, but hated what Nixon did?
Gunner Asch
Because FDR was a Democrat. The fact he lenghted the Great Depression by
11 yrs...is of no matter.
Gunner
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the
means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not
making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of
it. In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different
countries, that the more public provisions were made for the
poor the less they provided for themselves, and of course became
poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the
more they did for themselves, and became richer." -- Benjamin
Franklin, /The Encouragement of Idleness/, 1766
HH&C
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:46:54 -0800 (PST), Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com>
Cite?
knews4...@yahoo.com
Observer
What did FDR do? Remember, you've recently made claims I refuted.
I hated Nixon resigning? Got a cite?
Observer
You've claimed to have switched parties, Welfare Queen. Enjoy the
ride.
>Gunner
>
>"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the
>means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not
>making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of
>it. In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different
>countries, that the more public provisions were made for the
>poor the less they provided for themselves, and of course became
>poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the
>more they did for themselves, and became richer." -- Benjamin
>Franklin, /The Encouragement of Idleness/, 1766
Funny quote from a Welfare Queen.
Observer
AFTER you provide cites for your FDR claim. Until then, keep your
nose out of my ass
Curly Surmudgeon
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:28:51 -0800 (PST), "HH&C"
> <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 25, 10:05 pm, "Lib Loo" <heezb...@crazymother.kom> wrote:
>>> "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>>
news:af0633f7-03d4-4281...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> > While Obama vacations in Hawaii, a person on the No-Fly list flies
>>> > with explosives.
>>>
>>> > How does this happen???
>>>
>>> Bush fooled Obama again?
>>
>>Bush is amazing. He can probably throw his voice, too, making us think
>>that Obama said something intelligent.
>
> If Bush could have done that then he'd have said something intelligent
> while still president.
Fixed that for you...
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vote Republican, Suffering Builds Character
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Strabo
> On Dec 30, 4:58 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 30, 5:35 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>>> You're now saying PETN brought down the WTC!! BWAHAAAHHAHAHAAAA!!!- Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> You are lost as usual.
>> Your content-less surrender is accepted, knowsknothing! Game, set and
>> match go to me!
>>
>> PETN cannot bring down towers. There were no explosives going off at
>> collapse initiation. Controlled demolition has absolutely been proven
>> to be a complete physical impossibility.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> You are still lost.
> You are claiming that I claimed something I did not.
> You are a twisted liar.
>
That was apparent months ago so stop responding to the twit.
Iarnrod
By being by far the most qualified candidate.
Iarnrod
You are still evading the psychical impossibility of all of your
claims.
> You are claiming that I claimed something I did not.
No I am not.
> You are a twisted liar.
Projection from knowsknothing, whom I have proven multiple times to be
a blatant liar.
Iarnrod
Yet another rightarded moron whom I have proven to be a liar on
multiple occasions!!!!
knews4...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
You have never proven anything.
All you do is spew, arm wave, and claim others made claims they never
did.
You never provide any cites for any of your "proof."
You lie and say other's cites are proof of your own twisted arguments.
If you can't do that you claim "impossible."
You are a pathological, twisted, pitiful liar.
Iarnrod
I have proven everything I have said and I have conclusively proven
you to be wrong. Q.E.D.
Explain to us your "theory" than PETN brought down the towers -- even
though it's incapable of it and none was found.
<chuckle>
knews4...@yahoo.com
You have NEVER proven a thing.
All you do is deny, spew, arm wave, and lie.
> Explain to us your "theory" than PETN brought down the towers -- even
> though it's incapable of it and none was found.
>
Another of your lies.
I never said or implied any such thing.
You are lost.
> <chuckle>
Yes, that's all you have is "chuckles."
Just like looney who laughs at nothing.
Iarnrod
Whatever, Q.E.D. it is, kooker.
> You have NEVER proven a thing.
I have proven everything I has said, beyond doubt.
> All you do is deny, spew, arm wave, and lie.
That is youm knowsknothing. You are going on this arm-waving foaming
rant to deflect attention from the FACT that you have YET to provide
one shred of evidence for any of the stupid kookshit things you've
claimed,
> > Explain to us your "theory" than PETN brought down the towers -- even
> > though it's incapable of it and none was found.
>
> Another of your lies.
> I never said or implied any such thing.
You did, of course.
So now you're backing off, once your hand was called? <snicker> I knew
you would. Kooks like you NEVER give evidence for any of your claims.
You cannot, since they are false.
knews4...@yahoo.com
> > You have NEVER proven a thing.
>
> I have proven everything I has said, beyond doubt.
>
> > All you do is deny, spew, arm wave, and lie.
>
> That is youm knowsknothing. You are going on this arm-waving foaming
> rant to deflect attention from the FACT that you have YET to provide
> one shred of evidence for any of the stupid kookshit things you've
> claimed,
>
Liar.
> > > Explain to us your "theory" than PETN brought down the towers -- even
> > > though it's incapable of it and none was found.
>
> > Another of your lies.
> > I never said or implied any such thing.
>
> You did, of course.
>
Liar.
> So now you're backing off, once your hand was called? <snicker> I knew
> you would. Kooks like you NEVER give evidence for any of your claims.
> You cannot, since they are false.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Liar.
That is all you have.
You are pathological.
You are lost.
You have done nothing but spew.
You never provide a cite for your lies.
You never provide proof of anything you claim you have proven.
You are a sick little big shot that has nothing but name calling spew.
You argue like a child bully in the schoolyard.
Iarnrod
Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
> > > You have NEVER proven a thing.
>
> > I have proven everything I has said, beyond doubt.
>
> Liar.
Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
> > > All you do is deny, spew, arm wave, and lie.
>
> > That is you, knowsknothing. You are going on this arm-waving foaming
> > rant to deflect attention from the FACT that you have YET to provide
> > one shred of evidence for any of the stupid kookshit things you've
> > claimed,
>
> Liar.
Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
> > > > Explain to us your "theory" than PETN brought down the towers -- even
> > > > though it's incapable of it and none was found.
>
> > > Another of your lies.
> > > I never said or implied any such thing.
>
> > You did, of course.
>
> Liar.
Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
> > So now you're backing off, once your hand was called? <snicker> I knew
> > you would. Kooks like you NEVER give evidence for any of your claims.
> > You cannot, since they are false.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Liar.
Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
> That is all you have.
Yes, absolute truth is all I have and is all I need to defeat your
stupid kooker disproven ass.
> You never provide a cite for your lies.
How could I possibly provide a cite for lies when I have never told a
lie?
I do however provide all cites for my claims which are proven true.
> You never provide proof of anything you claim you have proven.
I always provide proof and have done so while you never even provide a
single shred of evidence for your physically impossible claims.
> You are a sick little big shot that has nothing but name calling spew.
I am your vast intellectual better who always has my proof in hand
while you never have anything.
knews4...@yahoo.com
You got a mouse in your pocket?
You got nothing but lies and spew.
> > > > You have NEVER proven a thing.
>
> > > I have proven everything I has said, beyond doubt.
>
> > Liar.
>
> Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
Same lie.
A you practicing for the Goebbles award?
"Keep telling the same lie over and over and people will believe it."
> > > > All you do is deny, spew, arm wave, and lie.
>
> > > That is you, knowsknothing. You are going on this arm-waving foaming
> > > rant to deflect attention from the FACT that you have YET to provide
> > > one shred of evidence for any of the stupid kookshit things you've
> > > claimed,
>
> > Liar.
>
> Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
Ok you win.
You are the biggest liar on the net.
> > > > > Explain to us your "theory" than PETN brought down the towers -- even
> > > > > though it's incapable of it and none was found.
>
> > > > Another of your lies.
> > > > I never said or implied any such thing.
>
> > > You did, of course.
>
> > Liar.
>
> Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
Care to provide a cite fr your lies?
> > > So now you're backing off, once your hand was called? <snicker> I knew
> > > you would. Kooks like you NEVER give evidence for any of your claims.
> > > You cannot, since they are false.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Liar.
>
> Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
Every time I provide a cite you lie and say it proves your argument.
You have more lies than anyone on the net.
> > That is all you have.
>
> Yes, absolute truth is all I have and is all I need to defeat your
> stupid kooker disproven ass.
>
You've proven nothing except that you are a pathological liar.
> > You never provide a cite for your lies.
>
> How could I possibly provide a cite for lies when I have never told a
> lie?
>
You are lost again.
Now you will lie you way to more lies.
> I do however provide all cites for my claims which are proven true.
>
You have never provided a cite.
Your lies continue.
> > You never provide proof of anything you claim you have proven.
>
> I always provide proof and have done so while you never even provide a
> single shred of evidence for your physically impossible claims.
>
Liar.
> > You are a sick little big shot that has nothing but name calling spew.
>
> I am your vast intellectual better who always has my proof in hand
> while you never have anything.
More of your twisted pathological lies.
Every time I provide a cite you snip it and then claim it makes your
case.
You are one sick puppy and everyone can see it.
Thanks for proving it again..
Iarnrod
Well, yeah. You know, all the sane people out here who have been
correcting your oh so many lies.
> You got a mouse in your pocket?
No. You need one?
> You got nothing but lies and spew.
Sorry, knowsknothing, but it's a proven fact that I have never told a
lie while you have done nothing BUT lie.
> > > > > You have NEVER proven a thing.
>
> > > > I have proven everything I has said, beyond doubt.
>
> > > Liar.
>
> > Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> > bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> > impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
> Same lie.
Nope. Truth, proven.
> A you practicing for the Goebbles award?
>
> "Keep telling the same lie over and over and people will believe it."
No one could take it from you, knowsknothing. You're the rightard
who's retired that trophy.
> > > > > All you do is deny, spew, arm wave, and lie.
>
> > > > That is you, knowsknothing. You are going on this arm-waving foaming
> > > > rant to deflect attention from the FACT that you have YET to provide
> > > > one shred of evidence for any of the stupid kookshit things you've
> > > > claimed,
>
> > > Liar.
>
> > Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> > bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> > impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
> Ok you win.
I kow I do.
> > > > > > Explain to us your "theory" than PETN brought down the towers -- even
> > > > > > though it's incapable of it and none was found.
>
> > > > > Another of your lies.
> > > > > I never said or implied any such thing.
>
> > > > You did, of course.
>
> > > Liar.
>
> > Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> > bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> > impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
> Care to provide a cite fr your lies?
Since I have never lied, that's not possible. I have however provided
cites for all YOUR lies!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!
> > > > So now you're backing off, once your hand was called? <snicker> I knew
> > > > you would. Kooks like you NEVER give evidence for any of your claims.
> > > > You cannot, since they are false.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Liar.
>
> > Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> > bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> > impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
> Every time I provide a cite
You have NEVER provided a cite, knowsknothing.
> you lie and say it proves your argument.
Wrong.
> You have more lies than anyone on the net.
Name one.
You can't and you won't.
NAME ONE!
Go ahead. YOU made the challenge here and I am CALLING OUT your stupid
kooker ass on it. NAME ONE THING I have said that you stupidly "think"
is a lie. You will very quickly learn not to lie any more.
You can't and you won't. You will pussy out like you ALWAYS do because
deep down you know you have nothing.
knews4...@yahoo.com
Another lie upon lie.
> > > > > > You have NEVER proven a thing.
>
> > > > > I have proven everything I has said, beyond doubt.
>
> > > > Liar.
>
> > > Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> > > bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> > > impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
> > Same lie.
>
> Nope. Truth, proven.
>
Same modus operandi.
> > A you practicing for the Goebbles award?
>
> > "Keep telling the same lie over and over and people will believe it."
>
> No one could take it from you, knowsknothing. You're the rightard
> who's retired that trophy.
>
Name calling proves nothing but loser tactics.
> > > > > > All you do is deny, spew, arm wave, and lie.
>
> > > > > That is you, knowsknothing. You are going on this arm-waving foaming
> > > > > rant to deflect attention from the FACT that you have YET to provide
> > > > > one shred of evidence for any of the stupid kookshit things you've
> > > > > claimed,
>
> > > > Liar.
>
> > > Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> > > bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> > > impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
> > Ok you win.
>
> I kow I do.
>
Yup, you are the biggest pathological liar on the net.
> > > > > > > Explain to us your "theory" than PETN brought down the towers -- even
> > > > > > > though it's incapable of it and none was found.
>
> > > > > > Another of your lies.
> > > > > > I never said or implied any such thing.
>
> > > > > You did, of course.
>
> > > > Liar.
>
> > > Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> > > bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> > > impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
> > Care to provide a cite fr your lies?
>
> Since I have never lied, that's not possible. I have however provided
> cites for all YOUR lies!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!
>
Liar.
You are like a broken record.
> > > > > So now you're backing off, once your hand was called? <snicker> I knew
> > > > > you would. Kooks like you NEVER give evidence for any of your claims.
> > > > > You cannot, since they are false.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > Liar.
>
> > > Nope. Proven truth. Everyone knows it except you, knowsknothing. too
> > > bad you FAILED to post even one iota of evidence for your physically
> > > impossible claims! We knew you wouldn't because you couldn't!
>
> > Every time I provide a cite
>
> You have NEVER provided a cite, knowsknothing.
>
And you are blind too.
Keep it up.
Everyone can see what a liar you are.
> > you lie and say it proves your argument.
>
> Wrong.
>
> > You have more lies than anyone on the net.
>
> Name one.
>
See above and all your other posts.
> You can't and you won't.
>
> NAME ONE!
>
I just did.
> Go ahead. YOU made the challenge here and I am CALLING OUT your stupid
> kooker ass on it. NAME ONE THING I have said that you stupidly "think"
> is a lie. You will very quickly learn not to lie any more.
>
Read your posts.
They are laced with lies.
> You can't and you won't. You will pussy out like you ALWAYS do because
> deep down you know you have nothing.
And again all you have is name calling spew.
Here is how buildings fall when demolition fails.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1239841/Youre-doing-wrong-Chinese-demolition-men-accidentally-create-leaning-tower-Liuzhou.html
Now get lost liar.
Iarnrod
<snip completely content-less post from knowsknothing that FAILED to
rise to the challenge I issued to his stupid kooker ass:
"Go ahead. YOU made the challenge here and I am CALLING OUT your
stupid
kooker ass on it. NAME ONE THING I have said that you stupidly "think"
is a lie. You will very quickly learn not to lie any more.
"You can't and you won't. You will pussy out like you ALWAYS do
because
deep down you know you have nothing."
I PREDICTED correctly that knowsknothing WOULDN'T and COULDN'T name
ONE THING I have said that he stupidly thought was a lie. HE FAILED.
He will continue to fail since everything I have said is proven truth.
Knowsknothing will continue to dodge and weave and tap dance away
without confronting the complete falsity of everything he has said,
which has been proven false!! WATCH!! The fool's next will continue to
EVADE!!
knews4...@yahoo.com
> On Jan 1, 3:25 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
> <snip completely content-less post from knowsknothing that FAILED to
> rise to the challenge I issued to his stupid kooker ass:
>
You mean snip your lies upon lies.
> "Go ahead. YOU made the challenge here and I am CALLING OUT your
> stupid
> kooker ass on it. NAME ONE THING I have said that you stupidly "think"
> is a lie. You will very quickly learn not to lie any more.
>
I did it and you snipped it.
> "You can't and you won't. You will pussy out like you ALWAYS do
> because
> deep down you know you have nothing."
>
You are a liar.
You are a chest pounding punk.
> I PREDICTED correctly that knowsknothing WOULDN'T and COULDN'T name
> ONE THING I have said that he stupidly thought was a lie. HE FAILED.
>
You lie now.
I did by pointing out your raft of lies in the last post you snipped
along with this link.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1239841/Youre-doing-wrong-Chinese-demolition-men-accidentally-create-leaning-tower-Liuzhou.html
Which proves another of your lies when you said about me that "you
never post links."
> He will continue to fail since everything I have said is proven truth.
>
This is another lie as well.
You've proven nothing except that you are a pathological liar.
Did you go to the Hitler School of Argument?
> Knowsknothing will continue to dodge and weave and tap dance away
> without confronting the complete falsity of everything he has said,
> which has been proven false!! WATCH!! The fool's next will continue to
> EVADE!!
Grow up.
You are acting like a child in the school yard.
You've got nothing.
Everyone can see that you are nothing less than a lying blowhard.
Iarnrod
> On Jan 1, 7:52 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 1, 3:25 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > <snip completely content-less post from knowsknothing that FAILED to
> > rise to the challenge I issued to his stupid kooker ass:
>
> You mean snip your lies upon lies.
Nope. Snipped your non-responsive foaming rant meant to divert
attention from the FACT that you PUSSIED OUT and FAILED to name
anything I have said that is a lie. You are STILL evading,
knowsknothing, because you WILL NOT and CANNOT come up with even one
thing.
We know that.
And you will continue to PUSSY OUT and NOT RESPOND to the homework I
have assigned you: NAME ONE THING I have said that you stupidly
"think" is a lie. Try again, dearie....
HH&C
The far most qualified candidates were washed out in the primaries,
and they weren't all that good.
HH&C
I provided a cite. Your favorite - wikipedia. If you missed my
citation, you'll just have to look it up yourself.
Now provide a cite for your claims.
Iarnrod
Nope. But thanks for trying.
Observer
Nope.
>Your favorite - wikipedia.
Nope. YOu are making shit up. Again.
>If you missed my
>citation, you'll just have to look it up yourself.
Can't find something that does not exist.
>Now provide a cite for your claims.
I have. However, you continue to perpetuate a lie.
Kindly remove your nose from my ass. TIA.
HH&C
You misunderobserve the problem. Now even Dan has posted that FDR
made gold illegal for commerce.
Sorry about your luck.
Observer
YOUR claim was that he made the private ownership ILLEGAL.
>Sorry about your luck.
Sorry about you perpetuating your lie.
BTW, kindly remove your nose from my ass.
knews4...@yahoo.com
> On Jan 1, 9:21 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > On Jan 1, 7:52 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 1, 3:25 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > <snip completely content-less post from knowsknothing that FAILED to
> > > rise to the challenge I issued to his stupid kooker ass:
>
> > You mean snip your lies upon lies.
>
> Nope.
Liar.
And you snipped the issue at hand again.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1239841/Youre-doing-wrong-Chinese-demolition-men-accidentally-create-leaning-tower-Liuzhou.html
>Snipped your non-responsive foaming rant meant to divert
> attention from the FACT that you PUSSIED OUT and FAILED to name
> anything I have said that is a lie. You are STILL evading,
> knowsknothing, because you WILL NOT and CANNOT come up with even one
> thing.
>
And you are still a full of shit liar.
> We know that.
>
> And you will continue to PUSSY OUT and NOT RESPOND to the homework I
> have assigned you: NAME ONE THING I have said that you stupidly
> "think" is a lie. Try again, dearie....
Loser.
You are not the boss here.
I already named and posted your raft of lies which you snipped along
with the subject at hand in China.
But you keep avoiding it like the plague and snipping it.
Don't worry though everyone here knows your loser tactics.
Dan
He most certainly DID NOT do any such thing. Your position is so
untenable that you are FORCED to lie to support it. Sad.
Dan
Iarnrod
> On Jan 2, 9:55 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 1, 9:21 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 1, 7:52 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 1, 3:25 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > <snip completely content-less post from knowsknothing that FAILED to
> > > > rise to the challenge I issued to his stupid kooker ass:
>
> > > You mean snip your lies upon lies.
>
> > Nope.
>
> Liar.
That's funny, since you have PUSSIED OUT of EVERY challenge to name
even one thing I have said that you stupidly "think" is a lie. You
can't and you won't since I have never lied. And your ongoing FAILURE
to name one lie is testimony to that FACT!
> And you snipped the issue at hand again.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1239841/Youre-doing...
That article is not an "issue at hand" as it has absolutely ZERO
relevance to anything under discussion, knowsknothing.
Now WHERE is your ONE CITE to anything I've said that you think is a
lie. Try it. You can't and you won't.
> >Snipped your non-responsive foaming rant meant to divert
> > attention from the FACT that you PUSSIED OUT and FAILED to name
> > anything I have said that is a lie. You are STILL evading,
> > knowsknothing, because you WILL NOT and CANNOT come up with even one
> > thing.
>
> And you are still a full of shit liar.
Since you FAILED to cite even one instance where I have lied -- which
you cannot possibly do since everything I have said is proven truth --
YOU are exposed as the lying liar that you are.
> > We know that.
>
> > And you will continue to PUSSY OUT and NOT RESPOND to the homework I
> > have assigned you: NAME ONE THING I have said that you stupidly
> > "think" is a lie. Try again, dearie....
>
> Loser.
That's you!
> You are not the boss here.
Yes I am. When you claim I am a liar but cannot name even on thing I
have said that is wrong, that entitles me to DEMAND YOUR STUPID KOOKER
ASS come up with just one little bitty thing... BUT YOU CAN'T AND YOU
WON'T because I have never lied.
> I already named and posted your raft of lies which you snipped along
> with the subject at hand in China.
You did no such thing. You have NEVER posted ANYTHING I have said
that's a lie. NEVER!!! That's a FACT!
China is irrelevant and has nothing to do with WTC. I never made any
claim about anything in China, you are merely DANCING AWAY from your
PROVEN FAILURE!
> But you keep avoiding it like the plague and snipping it.
BWAHAHAAAHAHAAA!!!! I keep snipping your non-responsive PUSSYING OUT.
You cannot name ONE THING I have said that is a lie. It's not even
possible.
> Don't worry though everyone here knows your loser tactics.
Projection. I have utterly defeated every kooker klaim you have made,
of course. Every single one.
I predict that again, in your next post, you will once more FAIL to
name anything I have said that you stupidly "think" is a lie. I say
that here and now, knowing full well even though you KNOW I have
predicted your failure, you STILL will fail to pony up an example. We
all know that you can't and you won't. You will now prove me right by
failing once again. GO =======>
AllYou!
news:655bc06a-8973-4f11...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com,
knews4...@yahoo.com <knews4...@yahoo.com> mused:
> On Jan 2, 9:55 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Liar.
> And you snipped the issue at hand again.
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1239841/Youre-doing-wrong-Chinese-demolition-men-accidentally-create-leaning-tower-Liuzhou.html
You do realize, right, that you're posting more and more links, and
less and less of your own words. And the links you post don't
generally have much at all to do with the point at hand in the first
place, not even to mention that they're whacked.
Well, for as long as you'd prefer to have a battle of links, here ya
go.......... Refute these.
http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Myths
http://www.answers.com/topic/debunking-9-11-myths
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.slate.com/id/2088092/
http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/15881...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fahrenheit-2777
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/04/...
http://www.2spare.com/item_43133.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory
And these:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMQAC95kI&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMQAC95kI&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QajDxF9uEf4&mode=related&search=
http://jowenko.nl/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4k6GMddY-lQ
http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/gravity_equations_falling.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2873871255585611926
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/someonlinepapersandvideosbyme
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=3859529288033431294
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/WTC7_Fire_Videos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1LetB0z8_o
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/WTC7_Eyewitnesses.xls
http://preview.tinyurl.com/36rak3
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/
http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=016182179862191393560%3Ahx2yxincxdu
>> Snipped your non-responsive foaming rant meant to divert
>> attention from the FACT that you PUSSIED OUT and FAILED to name
>> anything I have said that is a lie. You are STILL evading,
>> knowsknothing, because you WILL NOT and CANNOT come up with
>> even one thing.
>>
> And you are still a full of shit liar.
The evidence proves that you are.
>> And you will continue to PUSSY OUT and NOT RESPOND to the
>> homework I have assigned you: NAME ONE THING I have said that
>> you stupidly "think" is a lie. Try again, dearie....
>
> Loser.
> You are not the boss here.
No, but he is a pretty good observer, and based upon his
observations, and mine, and using your standard for how some
observations are therefore proof, we've proven that you PUSSY OUT,
and fail to respond.
knews4...@yahoo.com
You are a pathetic pathological liar.
One of your most blatant lies is that I have told any lies.
You also lie by omission when you snip text.
All I do is post links which you deny are relevant.
I'm tired of your childish games and name calling.
You wouldn't know relevance if it ran over you.
I say black you say white.
You've got nothing.
You present nothing.
You spew pablum.
Grow up.
Get a life.
Repent.
You are sick.
Everyone can see it except your little clone follower.
AllYou!
news:3eb391b3-53c4-4e7f...@26g2000yqo.googlegroups.com,
knews4...@yahoo.com <knews4...@yahoo.com> mused:
Prove it.
> One of your most blatant lies is that I have told any lies.
> You also lie by omission when you snip text.
Prove it.
> All I do is post links
Which are hardly ever on point, or are hardly ever substantive. All
you do is post links as though they support your claims, or refute
those of others, but all the while knowing that it would take people
go through the laboreous process of opening each and every one of
your whacko links to prove that they're usless.
Well, I'll play that game too.
And these:
Now, respond to each one of those, in detail, or it's further proof
that you've got no argument.
> which you deny are relevant.
That's because they are not.
> I'm tired of your childish games and name calling.
Which YOU inititate.
> You wouldn't know relevance if it ran over you.
> I say black you say white.
That's because white is the right answer.
> You've got nothing.
Not true. Here:
And these:
> You present nothing.
Not true. Here:
And these:
> You spew pablum.
> Grow up.
> Get a life.
> Repent.
> You are sick.
> Everyone can see it except your little clone follower.
And you don't name call? LOL!