Right wing rejects sanity
Cliff
[
.....
It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
]
Jim Alder
news:41j5e5do9e257oai2...@4ax.com:
> http://www.amarillo.com/stories/102409/opi_letter2.shtml
> [
> .....
> It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
If only we had some.
--
So, how's that whole "hopey - changey"
thing working out for you so far?
Bush Disgraced the USA
"Jim Alder" <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9CAE9786027FA...@216.196.97.142...
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
> news:41j5e5do9e257oai2...@4ax.com:
>
>> http://www.amarillo.com/stories/102409/opi_letter2.shtml
>> [
>> .....
>> It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
>
> If only we had some.
Doctor's Memo: Keep sharp objects away from Alderloon for next 8 years.
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>
> http://www.amarillo.com/stories/102409/opi_letter2.shtml
> [
> .....
> It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
> ]
An opinion piece ?
And a not very rational one at that ?
Figured..
Jim Alder
@news.albasani.net:
"Sharp objects"? I guess that eliminates you.
Cliff
So you say the wingers kept insanity?
--
Cliff
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
One thing I can count on you to do Cliff is to always fail to make any
sense at all
No Bammer
What wingers are you talking about, WINGER.
Cliff
They did not say wingers were.
--
Cliff
tankfixer
>
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:02:16 -0700, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <iil7e5tll5l0tl7cr...@4ax.com>,
> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >>
> >> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:43:24 -0700, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <41j5e5do9e257oai2...@4ax.com>,
> >> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.amarillo.com/stories/102409/opi_letter2.shtml
> >> >> [
> >> >> .....
> >> >> It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
> >> >> ]
> >> >
> >> >An opinion piece ?
> >> >
> >> >And a not very rational one at that ?
> >> >
> >> >Figured..
> >>
> >> So you say the wingers kept insanity?
> >
> >One thing I can count on you to do Cliff is to always fail to make any
> >sense at all
>
> "It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership."
>
> They did not say wingers were.
You post random anonymous quotes....Like it will make you appear witty
and urbane..
You are only half right.
Cliff
I clearly posted the link.
See it above still?
BTW, How are your close relatives the rocks these days?
--
Cliff
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
You posted an opinion piece..
That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
shop...
Cliff
I posted a link.
>That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
>shop...
>
You are not looking for any sanity yet, eh?
--
Cliff
cavelamb
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
You think an opinion piece is fact ?
>
> >That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
> >shop...
> >
>
> You are not looking for any sanity yet, eh?
Why ?
Do you need help finding yours ?
pyotr filipivich
smo...@board.com reported Elvis on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:03:04 -0600
in misc.survivalism:
>On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:01:14 -0700, tankfixer
><paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> I posted a link.
>>
>>You think an opinion piece is fact ?
>
>
>Faux's "news" is that.
Why don't you go to France for the Grand Prix. It isn't what you
seem to believe, but you'll be someplace less annoying.
-
pyotr filipivich.
Just about the time you finally see light at the end of the tunnel,
you find out it's a Government Project to build more tunnel.
Cliff
Any winger would buy from Faux & Rush, right?
�Aristocracy Reborn�
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_102309/content/01125107.guest.html
"Ladies and gentlemen, Barack Obama is seriously dangerous," he told his
listeners. "To say that distribution of wealth is economic freedom is
intellectually insane... Why didn't this come out before the election in
November?" - Rush Limbaugh
"This is his thesis, his college thesis at Columbia" - Rush Limbaugh
Naturally, he "stole"/"borrowed" the material ....
OTOH This was a thing called a "link".
The sane might have noticed that.
>>
>> >That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
>> >shop...
>> >
>>
>> You are not looking for any sanity yet, eh?
>
>Why ?
>Do you need help finding yours ?
Do you fear sanity? Why?
Is gummer better off without it?
Are the wingnuts & gunnuts?
--
Cliff
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_102309/content/01125107.guest.html
> "Ladies and gentlemen, Barack Obama is seriously dangerous," he told his
> listeners. "To say that distribution of wealth is economic freedom is
> intellectually insane... Why didn't this come out before the election in
> November?" - Rush Limbaugh
> "This is his thesis, his college thesis at Columbia" - Rush Limbaugh
>
> Naturally, he "stole"/"borrowed" the material ....
>
> OTOH This was a thing called a "link".
> The sane might have noticed that.
Trying to change the subject are you ?
This is the opinion piece you quoted from,
http://www.amarillo.com/stories/102409/opi_letter2.shtml
Are you still challanged by the difference between news and opinion ?
>
> >>
> >> >That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
> >> >shop...
> >> >
> >>
> >> You are not looking for any sanity yet, eh?
> >
> >Why ?
> >Do you need help finding yours ?
>
> Do you fear sanity? Why?
> Is gummer better off without it?
> Are the wingnuts & gunnuts?
Keep it up,
the guys in white coats will be by soon for you
Cliff
Gee, I even provided a nice pretty link to it ....
>>
>> >>
>> >> >That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
>> >> >shop...
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> You are not looking for any sanity yet, eh?
>> >
>> >Why ?
>> >Do you need help finding yours ?
>>
>> Do you fear sanity? Why?
>> Is gummer better off without it?
>> Are the wingnuts & gunnuts?
>
>Keep it up,
>the guys in white coats will be by soon for you
IOW no reply.
--
Cliff
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
Not to a news story you didn't..
Are you still challanged by the difference between news and opinion ?
>
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
> >> >> >shop...
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> You are not looking for any sanity yet, eh?
> >> >
> >> >Why ?
> >> >Do you need help finding yours ?
> >>
> >> Do you fear sanity? Why?
> >> Is gummer better off without it?
> >> Are the wingnuts & gunnuts?
> >
> >Keep it up,
> >the guys in white coats will be by soon for you
>
> IOW no reply.
Are you still challanged by the difference between news and opinion ?
....the_pc_jellllybean!!.!!!!.
"tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2554168...@news.bytemine.net...
Dont mean to be picky, but you morons need to know it's "challenged".
>>
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
>> >> >> >shop...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You are not looking for any sanity yet, eh?
>> >> >
>> >> >Why ?
>> >> >Do you need help finding yours ?
>> >>
>> >> Do you fear sanity? Why?
>> >> Is gummer better off without it?
>> >> Are the wingnuts & gunnuts?
>> >
>> >Keep it up,
>> >the guys in white coats will be by soon for you
>>
>> IOW no reply.
>
> Are you still challanged by the difference between news and opinion ?
Please see note above, you subliterate knuckle-dragging mouth-breathing
cunt.
Cliff
Did you want it painted pink too?
>>
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
>> >> >> >shop...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You are not looking for any sanity yet, eh?
>> >> >
>> >> >Why ?
>> >> >Do you need help finding yours ?
>> >>
>> >> Do you fear sanity? Why?
>> >> Is gummer better off without it?
>> >> Are the wingnuts & gunnuts?
>> >
>> >Keep it up,
>> >the guys in white coats will be by soon for you
>>
>> IOW no reply.
>
>Are you still challanged by the difference between news and opinion ?
IOW no reply.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22Right+wing+rejects+sanity%22
Benj
wrote:
> http://www.amarillo.com/stories/102409/opi_letter2.shtml
> [
> .....
> It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
> ]
Doncha love the left winger thinking of the libs?
The article says that in their opinion, Conservatives are prejudiced
because they object to Obama being given the Nobel Peace prize simply
because he is the first black president rather than actually having
done something to further world peace. I mean that is just SO racist,
isn't it? It simply proves that conservatives are filled with hate.
But Lib whingers are never filled with hate. They only love! as is
shown by the example below of this author accepting "diversity" such
as the existence of a party other than Democrats.
"Maybe it is simply because he has followed eight long years of an
administration that believed in attack, attack, attack, kill, kill,
kill, hate, hate, hate as its foreign policy and replaced it with tact
and diplomacy."
"attack, attack, attack, kill, kill, kill, hate, hate, hate"? Wow
that is SO sane and peace-loving. And so respecting of other persons
views. Oh that's right, lefty Libs respect other people so much this
post was SPAMMED to all manner of unrelated newsgroups. I guess this
is what happens when all you think about is ordering other people
around and doing drugs.
Nothing like good shit in your stash to bring out that liberal "sane"
thinking.
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
Just wanting to to help people understand you can't tell the difference
between news and opinion..
>
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
> >> >> >> >shop...
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You are not looking for any sanity yet, eh?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Why ?
> >> >> >Do you need help finding yours ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Do you fear sanity? Why?
> >> >> Is gummer better off without it?
> >> >> Are the wingnuts & gunnuts?
> >> >
> >> >Keep it up,
> >> >the guys in white coats will be by soon for you
> >>
> >> IOW no reply.
> >
> >Are you still challanged by the difference between news and opinion ?
>
> IOW no reply.
Reply ?
Yes you a certifiably nuts..
>
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22Right+wing+rejects+sanity%22
>
> http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&source=hp&q=%22Right+wing+rejects+sanity%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn
MagneticEnergy
Yeah, we hate stupid actions from Affirmative Action Harvtards?
So writing 2000 pages of lootislation is not an attack?
You want to sick the IRS on us for not buying health insurance?
Attack?
Gee, that sounds like slavery, Toby Good Voter, he not read Pelosi
Bill, Pelosi good Massa, I can't goof off no mo, I gots to git me an
edge you mication and a job, Toby Good Voter? Dats not slavery,
that's being progressive with da new media?
Chinese has no capital gains tax, and nurses their corporations from
infancy into 800 lb gorillas, and liberals want to attack Americans
because they want conservatism to rule, not liberal communism that
gets votes by pretending to be conservative by using conservative
vocabulary, but not by actions?
Crushing liberal egg shell minds under the weight of their own
stupidity, one crushed acorn shell at a time.
Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009
a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.
b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of the internet communications system, including
all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the
nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and
physical control, unless those communications represent violations of
the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to
pursue any legal remedies.
c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possesion of the original author.
d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).
e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.
f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed by www.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.
g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links,
that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown
purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the
purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the
terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use"
regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.
h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which have free consumer information.
i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite
number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will
retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous
communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order
to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an
enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue
getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama
has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm,
mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic
emphasis)).
j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!
Cliff
Like something published in a NEWS paper?
>> >Are you still challanged by the difference between news and opinion ?
>>
>> Gee, I even provided a nice pretty link to it ....
>> Did you want it painted pink too?
>
>Just wanting to to help people understand you can't tell the difference
>between news and opinion..
Such as where it clearly stated "Opinion: Letter"?
Orjust the "Opinion" bit?
Are you rejecting all of sanity or just selected bits?
If the later, which bits?
Why & for how long have you done this?
Is it genetic, cultural or inbreeding?
I liked the educated thought, reason spelling & grammer in this comment:
[
You know that when Bush and Channy was in office that we were #1. Every body
respected us because we were unpredictable and scary. The did'nt know if we
would invade them next or not they only knew that we did'nt make up our minds
until it was too late and we had the resolve to stay in any war for ever if we
had to! Probably if Bush was still in the white house we would be taking care of
iran years ago and also korea again! Not talking to every body likke a bunch of
you know whats. Girls have them. I know all you libs out there will say talking
is good and stuff thats becuse you hate America and freedom! You make every body
sick with your little cars and hate for America. We did our talking when Bush
and Channy were in office. We told the world we would make them next and nows
the time to prove it! We should invade iran and get our respect back! Not
invading iran and maybe korea to is liberal and stupid! We still have a lot of
militery that is just in America not doing anything. Let these guys earn their
government pay. Let them go to war! Thats what they are here for. Plus Channy
has the balls to do it if Barrack HUSSANE Obama is a coward and wont do what the
people want! We decide and we decided that we need a leader! Channy in 12!
]
Any more questions about "Right wing rejects sanity"?
>> >> >> >> >That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
>> >> >> >> >shop...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> You are not looking for any sanity yet, eh?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Why ?
>> >> >> >Do you need help finding yours ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Do you fear sanity? Why?
>> >> >> Is gummer better off without it?
>> >> >> Are the wingnuts & gunnuts?
>> >> >
>> >> >Keep it up,
>> >> >the guys in white coats will be by soon for you
>> >>
>> >> IOW no reply.
>> >
>> >Are you still challanged by the difference between news and opinion ?
>>
>> IOW no reply.
>
>Reply ?
>Yes you a certifiably nuts..
IOW no reply.
Mike Spradlin
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
> news:41j5e5do9e257oai2...@4ax.com:
>
>> [
>> .....
>> It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
>
We will once we ban the rightards from voting. . .
http://hnn.us/articles/48916.html
Gunner Asch
We will, in less than 3 yrs..when the People individually start killing
the Far Leftwingers.
"IMHO, some people here give Jeff far more attention than he deserves,
but obviously craves. The most appropriate response, and perhaps the
cruelest, IMO, is to simply killfile and ignore him. An alternative, if
you must, would be to post the same standard reply to his every post,
listing the manifold reasons why he ought to be ignored. Just my $0.02
worth."
Tim Miller
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:38:30 -0600, Mike Spradlin
> <harva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Jim Alder wrote:
>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>> news:41j5e5do9e257oai2...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> http://www.amarillo.com/stories/102409/opi_letter2.shtml
>>>> [
>>>> .....
>>>> It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
>>> If only we had some.
>> We will once we ban the rightards from voting. . .
>>
>> http://hnn.us/articles/48916.html
>>
>>
>>
> We will, in less than 3 yrs..when the People individually start killing
> the Far Leftwingers.
>
Everybody but YOU, huh, coward? Gees, I take all that time off and
come back to find you're STILL blathering your cowardly spew. Are you
still giving out someone else's address to folks who want to "meet"
you??
ROFLMAO@U!!!
Curly Surmudgeon
Gummer claimed to be a "librul" to excuse his drain on social services.
Is he now predicting suicide in 3 years? Is there anything we can do to
expedite his forcast?
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bible: Slavery Good, Gays Bad, Snakes Talk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
Oh I see, you think any item published in a newspaper is acutally news ?
No matter what the content of the item ?
Then I'm sure you will enjoy this piece,
http://www.oregonlive.com/shoporegon/
>
> >> >Are you still challanged by the difference between news and opinion ?
> >>
> >> Gee, I even provided a nice pretty link to it ....
> >> Did you want it painted pink too?
> >
> >Just wanting to to help people understand you can't tell the difference
> >between news and opinion..
>
> Such as where it clearly stated "Opinion: Letter"?
> Orjust the "Opinion" bit?
You keep acting like it was a factual article and not just a persons
opinion.
> Are you rejecting all of sanity or just selected bits?
> If the later, which bits?
> Why & for how long have you done this?
> Is it genetic, cultural or inbreeding?
In your case I think its just cultural inbreeding, but thats only my
opnion.
False Premise
Tim Miller
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:37:23 -0400, Tim Miller
> <replyton...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Gunner Asch wrote:
>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:38:30 -0600, Mike Spradlin
>>> <harva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jim Alder wrote:
>>>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>>>> news:41j5e5do9e257oai2...@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.amarillo.com/stories/102409/opi_letter2.shtml
>>>>>> [
>>>>>> .....
>>>>>> It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
>>>>> If only we had some.
>>>> We will once we ban the rightards from voting. . .
>>>>
>>>> http://hnn.us/articles/48916.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> We will, in less than 3 yrs..when the People individually start killing
>>> the Far Leftwingers.
>>>
>>>
>> Everybody but YOU, huh, coward? Gees, I take all that time off and come
>> back to find you're STILL blathering your cowardly spew. Are you still
>> giving out someone else's address to folks who want to "meet" you??
>>
>> ROFLMAO@U!!!
>
> Gummer claimed to be a "librul" to excuse his drain on social services.
> Is he now predicting suicide in 3 years? Is there anything we can do to
> expedite his forcast?
We should probably buy him a gun. But that would be a "straw
purchase" and most likely illegal, since he's a "prohibited
person".
tankfixer
says...
>
> Jim Alder wrote:
> > Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
> > news:41j5e5do9e257oai2...@4ax.com:
> >
> >> http://www.amarillo.com/stories/102409/opi_letter2.shtml
> >> [
> >> .....
> >> It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
> >
> > If only we had some.
>
> We will once we ban the rightards from voting. . .
Really..
And just how do you plan on doing that ?
>
> http://hnn.us/articles/48916.html
Jim Alder
news:MPG.25566c5...@news.bytemine.net:
Plan? He has no plan. He is just an impotent prick making vapid threats
from Mommy's basement.
--
So, how's that whole "hopey - changey"
thing working out for you so far?
Jim Austin
wrote:
> http://www.amarillo.com/stories/102409/opi_letter2.shtml
> [
> .....
> It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
This guy equates sanity with pacifism.
Cliff
Was it new?
Or have wingers been insane a long time?
>No matter what the content of the item ?
>Then I'm sure you will enjoy this piece,
>http://www.oregonlive.com/shoporegon/
Put up your foorp that they lied in any of that.
(It's not Faux.)
>> >> >Are you still challanged by the difference between news and opinion ?
>> >>
>> >> Gee, I even provided a nice pretty link to it ....
>> >> Did you want it painted pink too?
>> >
>> >Just wanting to to help people understand you can't tell the difference
>> >between news and opinion..
>>
>> Such as where it clearly stated "Opinion: Letter"?
>> Or just the "Opinion" bit?
>
>You keep acting like it was a factual article and not just a persons
>opinion.
Such as where it clearly stated "Opinion: Letter"?
Or just the "Opinion" bit?
OTOH IF it's NOT factual show us some winger sanity ....
Thus far you have failed, eh?.
>> Are you rejecting all of sanity or just selected bits?
>> If the later, which bits?
>> Why & for how long have you done this?
>> Is it genetic, cultural or inbreeding?
>
>In your case I think its just cultural inbreeding, but thats only my
>opnion.
So who do you wish to murder or steal from today?
What lies will you tell?
>
>>
>> I liked the educated thought, reason spelling & grammer in this comment:
>> [
>> You know that when Bush and Channy was in office that we were #1. Every body
>> respected us because we were unpredictable and scary. The did'nt know if we
>> would invade them next or not they only knew that we did'nt make up our minds
>> until it was too late and we had the resolve to stay in any war for ever if we
>> had to! Probably if Bush was still in the white house we would be taking care of
>> iran years ago and also korea again! Not talking to every body likke a bunch of
>> you know whats. Girls have them. I know all you libs out there will say talking
>> is good and stuff thats becuse you hate America and freedom! You make every body
>> sick with your little cars and hate for America. We did our talking when Bush
>> and Channy were in office. We told the world we would make them next and nows
>> the time to prove it! We should invade iran and get our respect back! Not
>> invading iran and maybe korea to is liberal and stupid! We still have a lot of
>> militery that is just in America not doing anything. Let these guys earn their
>> government pay. Let them go to war! Thats what they are here for. Plus Channy
>> has the balls to do it if Barrack HUSSANE Obama is a coward and wont do what the
>> people want! We decide and we decided that we need a leader! Channy in 12!
>> ]
>>
>> Any more questions about "Right wing rejects sanity"?
I guess not <VBG>.
>> >> >> >> >> >That and 75 cents might get you a small coffee at the local coffe
>> >> >> >> >> >shop...
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> You are not looking for any sanity yet, eh?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Why ?
>> >> >> >> >Do you need help finding yours ?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Do you fear sanity? Why?
>> >> >> >> Is gummer better off without it?
>> >> >> >> Are the wingnuts & gunnuts?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Keep it up,
>> >> >> >the guys in white coats will be by soon for you
>> >> >>
>> >> >> IOW no reply.
>> >> >
>> >> >Are you still challanged by the difference between news and opinion ?
>> >>
>> >> IOW no reply.
>> >
>> >Reply ?
>> >Yes you a certifiably nuts..
>>
>> IOW no reply.
>
>False Premise
>
IOW no reply.
--
Cliff
Cliff
>On Oct 24, 2:44�am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>wrote:
>> �http://www.amarillo.com/stories/102409/opi_letter2.shtml
>> [
>> .....
>> It seems the world is ready to follow sane leadership.
>> ]
>
>This guy equates sanity with pacifism.
Consider neocon & winger wars over "WMDs" & etc:
So when the neocons claimed that they knew & had irrefutable proof
and refused to tell any that asked?
When they set up their plans to tell lies?
Can you use this excuse to break into your neighbor's house,
steal his things, murder him & his family, burn the house down,
call all your other neighbors that would not help you "terrorists",
and get off with huge prizes from the police?
"Officer, someday he might have had a BB gun in his basement. If
he ever got one he might have hurt someone's cat or invaded
Antartica with it ."
It's murder, pure & simple. Of about ~ 650,000 ++ ... plus
~ 2,000,000 now homeless IN Iraq and another ~ 2,000,000
(those that could afford it) refugees in other nations. Of those
~ 4,000,000 the US has taken in about 20 over all the years.
"If any one bring an accusation of any crime before the elders, and
does not prove what he has charged, he shall, if it be a capital
offense charged, be put to death." - Third Law, The Code of Hammurabi
written in about 1786 BC. In what is now (or was) Iraq.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2004/sep/12/Iraqandthemedia.politicsphilosophyandsociety
[
... US Secretary of State Colin Powell described neo-conservatives in the Bush
administration as 'fucking crazies' ....
]
"Right wing rejects sanity"
--
Cliff
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> So who do you wish to murder or steal from today?
> What lies will you tell?
>
>
Projecting again are you ?
Cliff
Run out of lies?
Found those "WMDs" yet?
--
Cliff
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:02:17 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <546te5hv4r7egmaao...@4ax.com>,
> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >> So who do you wish to murder or steal from today?
> >> What lies will you tell?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Projecting again are you ?
>
> Run out of lies?
Why, I'm not telling lies, are you ?
> Found those "WMDs" yet?
Yup
Cliff
How many other delusions do you have?
How long have you had them?
>
>> Found those "WMDs" yet?
>
>Yup
What meds don't work?
BTW, You are lying again.
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:05:51 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <aqu0f5lr6vjqj70st...@4ax.com>,
> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:02:17 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <546te5hv4r7egmaao...@4ax.com>,
> >> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >> >> So who do you wish to murder or steal from today?
> >> >> What lies will you tell?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Projecting again are you ?
> >>
> >> Run out of lies?
> >
> >Why, I'm not telling lies, are you ?
>
> How many other delusions do you have?
> How long have you had them?
When did you stop having sex with your kids ?
Cliff
>In article <l703f516h9fp46tcv...@4ax.com>,
>Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>>
>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:05:51 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <aqu0f5lr6vjqj70st...@4ax.com>,
>> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:02:17 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >In article <546te5hv4r7egmaao...@4ax.com>,
>> >> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>> >> >> So who do you wish to murder or steal from today?
>> >> >> What lies will you tell?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Projecting again are you ?
>> >>
>> >> Run out of lies?
>> >
>> >Why, I'm not telling lies, are you ?
>>
>> How many other delusions do you have?
>> How long have you had them?
>
>When did you stop having sex with your kids ?
Have you tried Thorazine?
>> >
>> >> Found those "WMDs" yet?
>> >
>> >Yup
>>
>> What meds don't work?
>>
>> BTW, You are lying again.
>>
>> Found those "WMDs" yet?
>
Found those "WMDs" yet?
--
Cliff
--
Cliff
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:00:15 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <l703f516h9fp46tcv...@4ax.com>,
> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >>
> >> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:05:51 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <aqu0f5lr6vjqj70st...@4ax.com>,
> >> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:02:17 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >In article <546te5hv4r7egmaao...@4ax.com>,
> >> >> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >> >> >> So who do you wish to murder or steal from today?
> >> >> >> What lies will you tell?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Projecting again are you ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Run out of lies?
> >> >
> >> >Why, I'm not telling lies, are you ?
> >>
> >> How many other delusions do you have?
> >> How long have you had them?
> >
> >When did you stop having sex with your kids ?
>
> Have you tried Thorazine?
have you tried intravenous Pb ?
>
> >> >
> >> >> Found those "WMDs" yet?
> >> >
> >> >Yup
> >>
> >> What meds don't work?
> >>
> >> BTW, You are lying again.
> >>
> >> Found those "WMDs" yet?
> >
>
> Found those "WMDs" yet?
Sure..
Cliff
>> >> >> Found those "WMDs" yet?
>> >> >
>> >> >Yup
>> >>
>> >> What meds don't work?
>> >>
>> >> BTW, You are lying again.
>> >>
>> >> Found those "WMDs" yet?
>> >
>>
>> Found those "WMDs" yet?
>
>Sure..
Found those "WMDs" yet?
--
Cliff
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
>> Found those "WMDs" yet?
>
> Sure..
Great! Seriously, that is most excellent. Now we can put this
interminable issue to rest. Finally.
Where are Saddam Hussein's 500,000 liters of chemical and biological
weapons, 2,000 modified delivery SCUD's, 5,000 arial drone aircraft,
mobile weapons laboratories and nuclear weapons?
TinLizziedl
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
This is one of the "discussions" I got into with Gunner. The only way
he could say that militarily-significant amounts of WMDs were found was
by citing an article stating that the Obama Administration had
classified high-explosives as WMDs. Following that reasoning, every
single country in the world has massive amounts of WMDs.
There were a handful of old shells found that contained severely
degraded sarin and mustard gas, but those were determined by our
military to be unuseable by the time we invaded in 2003. The shells had
been manufactured for the Iran-Iraq war (1980-88). The degredation
products are toxic, yes, but nowhere nearly as deadly as the fresh
active agent.
It is one of those failed rationalizations for invasion of a country
that had nothing to do with the terrorist attacts on 9/11/01.
And we knew they had them because the Reagan Administration was
supporting Iraq against the new Islamic Revolution in Iran. We helped
devise ways of getting the chemical and biologic weapons to Iraq for use
in that war.
Is it any real wonder why Iran thinks we're a bunch of assholes?
--
Tin Lizzie
"To delight in war is a merit in the soldier, a dangerous quality in the
captain, and a positive crime in the statesman." - George Santayana
SaPeIsMa
"TinLizziedl" <not...@donttry.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.255e0d0ec...@news.west.earthlink.net...
>>
> This is one of the "discussions" I got into with Gunner.
Stupid nym-changing trolls like you don't "get into discussion"
You just blather nonsense and imagine that you've stated something usefull
Cliff
IOW He/she was dead spot on !!!
--
Cliff
TinLizziedl
SaPe...@HotMail.com says...
Nym changing? I've used this same nym for years. It's the only nym I
have. Who else do you think I am? I have changed the sig below my nym
a time or two, but even that doesn't happen very often. Hell, I'm a
relative newcomer to the metalworking ng.
Would you care to blather more nonsense now?
--
Tin Lizzie
"Elephant: A mouse built to government specifications."-Lazarus Long
Gunner Asch
wrote:
>This is one of the "discussions" I got into with Gunner. The only way
>he could say that militarily-significant amounts of WMDs were found was
>by citing an article stating that the Obama Administration had
>classified high-explosives as WMDs. Following that reasoning, every
>single country in the world has massive amounts of WMDs.
Cites?
Or did you simply get the low bid on a dumptruck load of bullshit?
Gunner
tankfixer
Sure did..
Its a bitch huh ?
Cliff
Provide foorp.
WHAT "WMDs"?
>Its a bitch huh ?
Lies hurt, eh?
--
Cliff
Michael A. Terrell
'Whining Mangy Demmocrats'? They are all over the place. :(
--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
Cliff
IOW That's another clear "No!" then.
What are you going to do about the liars?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Incident
[
It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that
no attack happened that night. [...] In truth, Hanoi's navy was engaged in
nothing that night but the salvage of two of the boats damaged on August 2
]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WMDs_in_Iraq
[
On October 6, 2004, the head of the Iraq Survey Group (ISG), Charles Duelfer,
announced to the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee that the group found no
evidence that Iraq under Saddam Hussein had produced and stockpiled any weapons
of mass destruction since 1991, when UN sanctions were imposed.
]
--
Cliff
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> In article <g948f5trnsfthui06...@4ax.com>,
Great! Seriously, that is most excellent. Now we can put this
interminable issue to rest. Finally.
Where are Saddam Hussein's 500,000 liters of chemical and biological
weapons, 2,000 modified delivery SCUD's, 5,000 arial drone aircraft,
mobile weapons laboratories and nuclear weapons?
> Its a bitch huh ?
Not at all, that is wonderful. We can put this issue to rest, finally!
You seem to have knowledge that no one else in the world possesses,
share!!!
Now, tell us precisely where are Saddam Hussein's 500,000 liters of
chemical and biological weapons, 2,000 modified delivery SCUD's, 5,000
arial drone aircraft, mobile weapons laboratories and nuclear weapons are.
Curly Surmudgeon
<mike.t...@earthlink.net> wrote:
Got it. Demanding truth for committing our nation to war is "Whining."
It has long been apparent that Republicans and christers have thier own
dictionary but why don't you just make up new words rather than corrupt
common english?
Out of curiosity what does your dictionary call lying a nation into war?
Patriotism?
HH&C
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:41:16 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
>
>
>
>
>
> <mike.terr...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > tankfixer wrote:
>
> >> Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>
> >> > On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:00:05 -0800, tankfixer <paul.carr...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > >> >> >> Found those "WMDs" yet?
>
> >> > >> >> >Yup
>
> >> > >> >> What meds don't work?
>
> >> > >> >> BTW, You are lying again.
>
> >> > >> >> Found those "WMDs" yet?
>
> >> > >> Found those "WMDs" yet?
>
> >> > >Sure..
>
> >> > Found those "WMDs" yet?
>
> >> Sure did..
> >> Its a bitch huh ?
>
> > 'Whining Mangy Demmocrats'? They are all over the place. :(
>
> Got it. Demanding truth for committing our nation to war is "Whining."
> It has long been apparent that Republicans and christers have thier own
> dictionary
Really? Like you try to make up imaginary differences in meaning by
saying lower case anarchist vs upper case Anarchist???
You've been so full of shit your whole life that you can't smell it
anymore.
> but why don't you just make up new words rather than corrupt
> common english?
>
> Out of curiosity what does your dictionary call lying a nation into war?
> Patriotism?
>
> --
> Regards, Curly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Bible: Slavery Good, Gays Bad, Snakes Talk
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
tankfixer
Cliff
Found those "WMDs" yet?
--
Cliff
Cliff
That shut them up it seems.
--
Cliff
Cliff
That shut them up it seems.
--
Cliff
Cliff
wrote:
Find those "WMDs" yet?
--
Cliff
Curly Surmudgeon
Am I still stalking the cockroach?
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curly Surmudgeon
When pressed to substantiate their lies distractions, misdirections and
attacks only work for a limited time. The Rovian defense has lost its
power by overuse. At some point in time their lies break down revealing
the truth.
The truth is that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction and that
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, Gates, Ashcroft, Gonzales, Pearl, Rice,
Wolfowitz, Fleischer, Snow, Libby, neocons, Republicans and some
Democrats, et. al. lied to put us into an intractable situation. Once
you have a tiger by the tail it is impossible, or at least hideously
difficult, to disengage.
Then you can blame your successor.
We are not speaking of errors or misstatements but embroiling our nation
in war. Like most of the hawks who demanded invading Iraq few have
actually seen the face of war. Not once did Bush greet the fallen
soldiers returning from his failed policies. Nor did many of those
involved ever serve. Certainly not Bush, Cheney or their mouthpieces
like Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter or Beck.
These puppets are too stupid to realize they've allowed themselves to
voluntarily serve corporate interests turning America into a Fascist
state. And they're proud of being fascists. If you don't agree with
them then they'll threaten to kill you, beat you up, destroy America to
prove they are right or put your family at risk (Plame).
If you do not join their crusade you are unAmerican. Even if it includes
torture, their great American Value system has somehow morphed our nation
into the paradigm that greed, torture, theft, mass murder, rendition,
violating the Constitution and lies make them Patriotic.
They are mentally ill masquerading as Good Americans and incapable of
seeing themselves objectively. Banding together in their cliques for
mutual mental masturbation and attacking the very principles which made
our nation great will only work for a limited time.
I merely yank them back to reality.
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
Found you havn't we ?
You Whining Mangy Demmocrat
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
You claimed to have found the WMD's. Renaming the acronym will not
relieve you of substantiating your claim.
Where are Saddam Hussein's 500,000 liters of chemical and biological
weapons, 2,000 modified delivery SCUD's, 5,000 arial drone aircraft,
mobile weapons laboratories and nuclear weapons?
--
Lookout
wrote:
So the answer is no.
You dumbass..you believed that shit! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Observer
Apparently so. The pedophile cannibal has problems with shades of the
word "anarchist."
__
The last official act of any government is the looting of the nation.
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weap ons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear
program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists,
including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left
unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage
biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear
weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.
Curly Surmudgeon
It has problems with common American English.
Gunner Asch
wrote:
Dude...if you are going to give them Demoncrat quotes on WMD..give em
all of them
www.davidstuff.com/political/wmdquotes.htm
http://www.rightwingnews.com/quotes/demsonwmds.php
Simply cut and past and send them along to slap like a used condom in
the face of the Leftards
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman,
Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among
others on October 9, 1998
"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors
last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam
Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that
biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back
to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery
systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to
develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and
our allies." -- From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe
Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others
"Whereas Iraq has consistently breached its cease-fire agreement between
Iraq and the United States, entered into on March 3, 1991, by failing to
dismantle its weapons of mass destruction program, and refusing to
permit monitoring and verification by United Nations inspections;
Whereas Iraq has developed weapons of mass destruction, including
chemical and biological capabilities, and has made positive progress
toward developing nuclear weapons capabilities" -- From a joint
resolution submitted by Tom Harkin and Arlen Specter on July 18, 2002
"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while
retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We
cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline
Albright, 1998
"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and
some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he
has 10 times since 1983" -- National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb
18, 1998
"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all
weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to
its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence
reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not
yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002
"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat... Yes, he has
chemical and biological weapons. He's had those for a long time. But the
United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture
than we were before September 11th of 2001... He is, as far as we know,
actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn't have nuclear
warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends
in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we." -- Wesley
Clark on September 26, 2002
"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents
with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such
weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think
that, over the past four years, in the absence of international
inspectors, this country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques
Chirac, October 16, 2002
"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of
threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction,
ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond
today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be
emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including
Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his
involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear,
however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to
increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will
keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that
endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the
Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security."
-- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002
"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back
in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry
into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving
those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in
April of 2003
"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass
destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them
against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998
"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our
allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades,
Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every
available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He
has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is
trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to
build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to
achieving that goal." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002
"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national
security. It should be clear that our national security requires
Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is
united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002
"I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons
of mass destruction." -- Dick Gephardt in September of 2002
"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf
and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his
access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass
destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should
assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al
Gore, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Bob Graham, December 2002
"Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to
deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction." --
Jim Jeffords, October 8, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27,
2002
"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger,
that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass
destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." -- Ted Kennedy,
Sept 27, 2002
"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct
2002
"The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real,
but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that
war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert
Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build
those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these
weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we
had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation." --
John Kerry, October 9, 2002
"(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator,
leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He
presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently
prone to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America�s
response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of
mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations
Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq
disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It
has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War." -- John Kerry,
Jan 23, 2003
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them." -- Carl Levin, Sept 19,
2002
"Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological
weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for
the United States." -- Joe Lieberman, August, 2002
"Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and
biological weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq's denials, U.N.
inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear
facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various
reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons
capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear
weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons.U.N.
inspectors have said that Iraq's claims about biological weapons is
neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons
against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While
weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no
inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has
continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction."
-- Patty Murray, October 9, 2002
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that
the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of
grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the
development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat
to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons
inspection process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998
"Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible
intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq
still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and
clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen
bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue
manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of
the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard
gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic
missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial
infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale
chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in
1998
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can
obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources -- something that
is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we
have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development
of weapons of mass destruction." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002
"Saddam�s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a
very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons
before, both against Iraq�s enemies and against his own people. He is
working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial
vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and
U.S. facilities in the Middle East." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002
"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration�s policy
towards Iraq, I don�t think there can be any question about Saddam�s
conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11
years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm
and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear
capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the
mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games
the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and
legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the
United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts." -- Henry
Waxman, Oct 10, 2002
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great
deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use
nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the
greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others,
Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless
using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range
missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam
is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have
always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including
al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked,
Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological
and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass
destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
....the_pc_jellllybean!!.!!!!.
"Gunner Asch" <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:kjikf59mm298jp8v1...@4ax.com...
Yeah bummer for the gummer that not one of those launched an invasion of a
country based on that bullshit.
Must suck to be you girlymen........-*snicker*-
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
You've posted that many times yet refused to answer a simple question,
"How do Democratic Politicians excuse Bush's lying?"
Cliff
<CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
They are indeed working hard to bring about it's utter destruction.
Perhaps bin Laden owns most of Faux & pays Rush.
SOMEONE made a huge killing in the banks & markets too ..... and
stiffed us with the bill for decades to come.
>They are mentally ill masquerading as Good Americans and incapable of
>seeing themselves objectively. Banding together in their cliques for
>mutual mental masturbation and attacking the very principles which made
>our nation great will only work for a limited time.
>
>I merely yank them back to reality.
Many seem way past the bend.
--
Cliff
Cliff
That's a clear NO then is it?
And admission of the lies.
Cliff
Wingers are so dumb even for suckers.
--
Cliff
Cliff
Found those "WMDs" yet?
--
Cliff
Observer
<CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
And social skills.
And truthfullness.
And honesty.
Gunner Asch
Looks like those damned Leftards are stocking their cupboards in
advance.
Great battle dressings..simply stick em in the bullet holes and pull out
the cardboard tubes.
Seems the Lefties are starting to get worried.
Damned shame none of them can drive a truck worth a shit though.
"Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
Unknown Usnet Poster
Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
Keyton
Gray Ghost
> http://thecabin.net/news/2009-10-26/half-million-worth-feminine-products-s
> tolen
>
> Looks like those damned Leftards are stocking their cupboards in
> advance.
>
> Great battle dressings..simply stick em in the bullet holes and pull out
> the cardboard tubes.
>
> Seems the Lefties are starting to get worried.
>
> Damned shame none of them can drive a truck worth a shit though.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
> I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
> Unknown Usnet Poster
>
> Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
> Keyton
>
Shit, do you even know anyone under 40 who knows why there are 3 pedals on
the floor and why the gearshift feels funny?
--
�Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel
of envy, its inherent value is the equal sharing of misery.� Winston
Churchill
Gunner Asch
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
>Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in
>news:qhkfg5l9cn581n2s6...@4ax.com:
>
>> http://thecabin.net/news/2009-10-26/half-million-worth-feminine-products-s
>> tolen
>>
>> Looks like those damned Leftards are stocking their cupboards in
>> advance.
>>
>> Great battle dressings..simply stick em in the bullet holes and pull out
>> the cardboard tubes.
>>
>> Seems the Lefties are starting to get worried.
>>
>> Damned shame none of them can drive a truck worth a shit though.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
>> I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
>> Unknown Usnet Poster
>>
>> Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
>> Keyton
>>
>
>Shit, do you even know anyone under 40 who knows why there are 3 pedals on
>the floor and why the gearshift feels funny?
I live in a rural county. Most kids here think automatic trannies are
for pussies.
<G>
Gunner
Gunner Asch
>On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:45:46 -0800, Gunner Asch
><gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>
>>Looks like those damned Leftards are stocking their cupboards in
>>advance.
>
>You can store laugher?
Sure can.
We keep them in gated communities and ghettos. When we take em out...we
laugh like crazy.
Gunner
Gray Ghost
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:48:56 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>
>>Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in
>>news:qhkfg5l9cn581n2s6...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> http://thecabin.net/news/2009-10-26/half-million-worth-feminine-products
>>> -s tolen
>>>
>>> Looks like those damned Leftards are stocking their cupboards in
>>> advance.
>>>
>>> Great battle dressings..simply stick em in the bullet holes and pull
>>> out the cardboard tubes.
>>>
>>> Seems the Lefties are starting to get worried.
>>>
>>> Damned shame none of them can drive a truck worth a shit though.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
>>> I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
>>> Unknown Usnet Poster
>>>
>>> Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
>>> Keyton
>>>
>>
>>Shit, do you even know anyone under 40 who knows why there are 3 pedals
>>on the floor and why the gearshift feels funny?
>
> I live in a rural county. Most kids here think automatic trannies are
> for pussies.
>
Well good for them, at least they are not shiftless.
><G>
>
> Gunner
>
>
> "Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
> I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
> Unknown Usnet Poster
>
> Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
> Keyton
>
--
Gunner Asch
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
GACK!!!
Gunner, wiping chips off his monitor and out of his nose.
>
>><G>
>>
>> Gunner
>>
>>
>> "Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
>> I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
>> Unknown Usnet Poster
>>
>> Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
>> Keyton
>>
"Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
Gray Ghost
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:54:14 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>
>>Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in
>>news:4tmgg51nafmkfqrik...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:48:56 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
>>> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in
>>>>news:qhkfg5l9cn581n2s6...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> http://thecabin.net/news/2009-10-26/half-million-worth-feminine-produc
>>>>> ts -s tolen
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like those damned Leftards are stocking their cupboards in
>>>>> advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Great battle dressings..simply stick em in the bullet holes and pull
>>>>> out the cardboard tubes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems the Lefties are starting to get worried.
>>>>>
>>>>> Damned shame none of them can drive a truck worth a shit though.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
>>>>> I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
>>>>> Unknown Usnet Poster
>>>>>
>>>>> Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
>>>>> Keyton
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Shit, do you even know anyone under 40 who knows why there are 3 pedals
>>>>on the floor and why the gearshift feels funny?
>>>
>>> I live in a rural county. Most kids here think automatic trannies are
>>> for pussies.
>>>
>>
>>Well good for them, at least they are not shiftless.
>
>
> GACK!!!
>
> Gunner, wiping chips off his monitor and out of his nose.
;)
>
>
>>
>>><G>
>>>
>>> Gunner
>>>
>>>
>>> "Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
>>> I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
>>> Unknown Usnet Poster
>>>
>>> Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
>>> Keyton
>>>
>
> "Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
> I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
> Unknown Usnet Poster
>
> Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
> Keyton
>
--