Document link that may be of interest
Gunner Asch
Gunner
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the
means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not
making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of
it. In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different
countries, that the more public provisions were made for the
poor the less they provided for themselves, and of course became
poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the
more they did for themselves, and became richer." -- Benjamin
Franklin, /The Encouragement of Idleness/, 1766
Man_of_Mind
>
> http://micah.dyndns.org/files/FMs/
Thanks, but there's no field communications addressed by that..
--Like TM 11-665 and TM 11-666..
Gunner Asch
Yes and? So if you cant get a peanut and jelly sandwich at Arbys..you
simply wont go to one for any other type of food?
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind was laughing at the pathetic primate posturings posted by:
>>
>> On 1/3/2010 7:50 PM, Gummer Ash wrote:
>>>
>>> http://micah.dyndns.org/files/FMs/
>>
>> Thanks, but there's no field communications addressed by that..
>>
>> --Like TM 11-665 and TM 11-666..
>
> Yes and?
Oh, and encryption systems.. Used to do a bit of that, enough
that the COMMINT guys couldn't hang with me, since I've forgotten
more about that than they'll ever want to learn..
--I suppose you thought you'd get by with a CB radio, hunh?
Gunner Asch
Look boys and girls! Widdle Kur is spouting off all sorts of things he
recently read in somones left behind SOF!
Isnt that cute?! The little retard almost sounds human, doesnt he?
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind continued laughing at the pathetic primate posturings posted by:
>>
>> On 1/4/2010 10:55 PM, Gummer Ash was whining at:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind was laughing at the pathetic primate posturings posted by:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/3/2010 7:50 PM, Gummer Ash wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://micah.dyndns.org/files/FMs/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, but there's no field communications addressed by that..
>>>>
>>>> --Like TM 11-665 and TM 11-666..
>>>
>>> Yes and?
>>
>> Oh, and encryption systems.. Used to do a bit of that, enough
>> that the COMMINT guys couldn't hang with me, since I've forgotten
>> more about that than they'll ever want to learn..
>>
>> --I suppose you thought you'd get by with a CB radio, hunh?
>
> Look boys and girls! Widdle Kur is spouting off
I noted that your "link' had nothing about field communications,
and listed a couple of manuals that I have, along with several
ARRL Handbooks.. I've worked with QPSK technologies from
oilfield to commercial satellite frequencies..
That you would resort to your usual mawkish innuendoes in the
face of such a set of KSA's bespeaks an irrational insecurity
on your lame behalf..
Examples follows..
> Widdle Kur is spouting off all sorts of things he
> recently read in somones left behind SOF!
You referring to that 'zine for the arm-chair commando mindset?
--Gads! You really are a soft-headed right-wing zealot..
Gunner Asch
Shrug..its your the one getting all puffed up and excited about it. The
couple Ive read were not partiulary interesting to me. But then...if I
want to experience combat..I simply close my eyes and remember...
Shrug
So when will you be arriving? 31st request for your itenerary.
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind continued laughing at the "manly' chest thumping posted by:
I see that you've again failed to address what I've mentioned..
--How is your "great Cull" going to do without communications? *>LOL!<*
Observer
...and let the DT's carry you away.
>Shrug
>
>
>So when will you be arriving? 31st request for your itenerary.
>
>Gunner
>
>
>"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the
>means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not
>making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of
>it. In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different
>countries, that the more public provisions were made for the
>poor the less they provided for themselves, and of course became
>poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the
>more they did for themselves, and became richer." -- Benjamin
>Franklin, /The Encouragement of Idleness/, 1766
__
The last official act of any government is the looting of the nation.
Strabo
What in the hell are you arguing about? This is a survival topic
group. Just thank the man for posting a valuable link and talk about
something important.
HH&C
I missed the part where Gunner said there was.
Here's something you'll need...
http://micah.dyndns.org/files/FMs/FM%201-05%20Religous%20Support.pdf
HH&C
Winston can add it to his links page.
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind was castigating the one-dimensional chatter from:
>
Field communications.. Got any?
> This is a survival topic group.
Yeah, so you're just not going to communicate at all?
> Just thank the man for posting a valuable link
I did..
> and talk about something important.
Communications isn't important?
--Or are you just afraid to communicate that?..
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> On 1/5/2010 7:44 PM, Strabo wrote:
Gummer hung to death the only being who loved him unreservedly and would
listen to his crap. Mark doesn't communicate, he spews hatred.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://thegreen.stanleylieber.com/src/956977392.jpg
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chasseur
"HH&C" <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> a �crit dans le message de
news:aa89a1bd-a7d9-4dee...@21g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
http://micah.dyndns.org/files/FMs/FM%201-05%20Religous%20Support.pdf
I also found the link posted by Gunner interesting useful and on topic.
More of the same is welcome anytime.
Chasseur
Canada
HH&C
He's dying to see the upskirt of Hillary..
HH&C
> >http://micah.dyndns.org/files/FMs/
>
> >Gunner
>
> Even though your critics are right, there is no recipe for peanut
> butter and jelly on rye, with no seeds - there WAS a lot of good
> stuff. Between this link of yours and Ginny's, I've got a lot of
> reading ahead.
>
> Thanks much.
Here's a pretty good survival sandwich. Dried banana chips from the
food storage locker would give it the right amount of crunch.
Strabo
Naw. The banana is supposed to melt with the peanut butter.
Peanut butter (chunky of course) on rye with a sliced banana;
lightly fried in butter. Protein, carbs and a little fat, now
that's a meal!
Retief
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I noted that your "link' had nothing about field communications,
Gosh, now that is surely curious. And Gunner even mentioned field
communiciations in his subject line, didn't he:
"Document link that may be of interest"
Good grief!...
Retief
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind restored the original text/context ignored by:
>>
>> On 1/5/2010 1:35 AM, Gummer Ash continued wheedling and dissembling:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind continued laughing at the pathetic primate posturings posted by:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/4/2010 10:55 PM, Gummer Ash was whining at:
>>>>>
>>>>> Man_of_Mind was laughing at the pathetic primate posturings posted by:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/3/2010 7:50 PM, Gummer Ash wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://micah.dyndns.org/files/FMs/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, but there's no field communications addressed by that..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Like TM 11-665 and TM 11-666..
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes and?
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and encryption systems.. Used to do a bit of that, enough
>>>> that the COMMINT guys couldn't hang with me, since I've forgotten
>>>> more about that than they'll ever want to learn..
>>>>
>>>> --I suppose you thought you'd get by with a CB radio, hunh?
>>>
>>> Look boys and girls! Widdle Kur is spouting off
>>
>> ARRL Handbooks.. I've worked with QPSK technologies from
>> oilfield to commercial satellite frequencies..
>>
>> That you would resort to your usual mawkish innuendoes in the
>> face of such a set of KSA's bespeaks an irrational insecurity
>> on your lame behalf..
>>
>> Examples follows..
>>
>>> Widdle Kur is spouting off all sorts of things he
>>> recently read in somones left behind SOF!
>>
>> You referring to that 'zine for the arm-chair commando mindset?
>>
>> --Gads! You really are a soft-headed right-wing zealot..
>
Yup, you delete and bleat just like Gummer..
--And absent about the same time, too..
Retief
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 1/5/2010 7:44 PM, Strabo wrote:
>> What in the hell are you arguing about?
>
>Field communications.. Got any?
Dammit Gunner, your page didn't have any Quantum Field Theory, nor
Underwater Basket Weaving!!! What's the hell is wrong with you,
Gunner!! ;->
Retief
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind restored the following quoted text:
>>
>> On 1/5/2010 7:44 PM, Strabo wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Field communications.. Got any?
>
> Dammit Gunner, your page didn't have any Quantum Field Theory
You obviously understand nothing about such..
--Keep telling on yourself, goober..
Retief
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Man_of_Mind restored the following quoted text:
"Man_of_Mind" once again altered the posting, as he is dishonest.
Retief
Retief
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Man_of_Mind restored the original text/context ignored by:
"Man_of_Mind" once again altered the posting, as he is dishonest.
"Man_of_Mind", rank newbie, has never learned the basics of Usenet:
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html#ss2.1
Retief
Curly Surmudgeon
Are you really so clueless to seriously not know the answer to that
question?
> Retief
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Republican Values: Torture, Rape and Lies
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind restored the following quoted text:
>>
>>>
>>>>
You're again attempting to dodge where your insinuations and
personal attacks failed you, so you deleted the refutations
of your simple-minded character smears and pathetic epithets..
So, I've restored them, and all you can do is whine about it..
--Way to go, goober. Keep up the great work..
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind restored the original text/context deleted by:
>>
>> On 1/7/2010 10:52 PM, Retief courageously deleted and bleated:
>>>
>>>>
I restored the original text that you've dishonestly deleted
so as to avoid where your false assertions and insinuations
have been refuted..
> as he is dishonest.
You're projecting your own sociopathy again..
--Please continue to expose what a fraud you are, goober..
Retief
<CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:25:28 -0600, Retief <nos...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:36:01 -0600, Man_of_Mind
>> <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 1/5/2010 7:44 PM, Strabo wrote:
>>>> What in the hell are you arguing about?
>>>
>>>Field communications.. Got any?
>>
>> Dammit Gunner, your page didn't have any Quantum Field Theory, nor
>> Underwater Basket Weaving!!! What's the hell is wrong with you,
>> Gunner!! ;->
>
>Are you really so clueless to seriously not know the answer to that
>question?
Good grief, Squirrley... You didn't see the smiley face, huh?
Retief
Retief
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
<Snipped "Man_of_Mind's" post forgery>
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html#ss2.1
Retief
Retief
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slappings bestowed upon:
I accept your surrender, goober..
--Anything else you'd like to humiliate yourself with?
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slappings administered to:
>>
>> On 1/8/2010 12:24 AM, Retief courageously deleted and bleated:
Vain attempt at a false appeal to authority laughed at, again..
--I accept your surrender, you pompously posturing primate..
HH&C
> HH&C wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 8:00 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote:
> >> Gunner Asch <gun...@lightspeed.net> wrote:
> >>>http://micah.dyndns.org/files/FMs/
> >>> Gunner
> >> Even though your critics are right, there is no recipe for peanut
> >> butter and jelly on rye, with no seeds - there WAS a lot of good
> >> stuff. Between this link of yours and Ginny's, I've got a lot of
> >> reading ahead.
>
> >> Thanks much.
>
>
> > Here's a pretty good survival sandwich. Dried banana chips from the
> > food storage locker would give it the right amount of crunch.
>
> >
>
> Naw. The banana is supposed to melt with the peanut butter.
>
> Peanut butter (chunky of course) on rye with a sliced banana;
> lightly fried in butter. Protein, carbs and a little fat, now
>
> - Show quoted text -
The King lives!
Curly Surmudgeon
If you know then tell us what is wrong with Gummer. Other than the
obvious dementia...
--
Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who's God Do You Kill For?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
roger gilbert
There doesn't appear to be any evidence that you can get along with
anyone here, why is that?
roger gilbert
Why are you such an angry person?
roger gilbert
Why can't you get along with folks here?
roger gilbert
You seem to be incapable of posting here without engendering conflict.
roger gilbert
Your rage and anger are largely useless.
roger gilbert
> On 1/4/2010 10:55 PM, Gummer Ash was whining at:
>>
>> Man_of_Mind was laughing at the pathetic primate posturings posted by:
>>>
>>> On 1/3/2010 7:50 PM, Gummer Ash wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://micah.dyndns.org/files/FMs/
>>>
>>> Thanks, but there's no field communications addressed by that..
>>>
>>> --Like TM 11-665 and TM 11-666..
>>
>> Yes and?
>
> Oh, and encryption systems.. Used to do a bit of that, enough
> that the COMMINT guys couldn't hang with me, since I've forgotten
> more about that than they'll ever want to learn..
>
> --I suppose you thought you'd get by with a CB radio, hunh?
Your need to retreat to resume braggadocios so noted...
roger gilbert
> On 1/5/2010 1:35 AM, Gummer Ash continued wheedling and dissembling:
>>
>>>
>>> On 1/4/2010 10:55 PM, Gummer Ash was whining at:
>>>>
>>>> Man_of_Mind was laughing at the pathetic primate posturings posted by:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/3/2010 7:50 PM, Gummer Ash wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://micah.dyndns.org/files/FMs/
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, but there's no field communications addressed by that..
>>>>>
>>>>> --Like TM 11-665 and TM 11-666..
>>>>
>>>> Yes and?
>>>
>>> Oh, and encryption systems.. Used to do a bit of that, enough
>>> that the COMMINT guys couldn't hang with me, since I've forgotten
>>> more about that than they'll ever want to learn..
>>>
>>> --I suppose you thought you'd get by with a CB radio, hunh?
>>
>
> I noted that your "link' had nothing about field communications,
> and listed a couple of manuals that I have, along with several
> ARRL Handbooks.. I've worked with QPSK technologies from
> oilfield to commercial satellite frequencies..
>
> That you would resort to your usual mawkish innuendoes in the
> face of such a set of KSA's bespeaks an irrational insecurity
> on your lame behalf..
>
> Examples follows..
>
>> Widdle Kur is spouting off all sorts of things he
>> recently read in somones left behind SOF!
>
> You referring to that 'zine for the arm-chair commando mindset?
>
> --Gads! You really are a soft-headed right-wing zealot..
You really are incapable of seeing anything in non-partisan terms.
Man_of_Mind
Your false accusations and straw men are baseless..
--And utterly without merit..
Man_of_Mind
Your sockpuppetry is noted and logged..
--Your evasions are still amusingly ignorant..
roger gilbert
Nothing false about them.
> --And utterly without merit..
Ripe with merit, your behavior here as confirmation.
roger gilbert
Your identical cover is documented and recorded as well.
> --Your evasions are still amusingly ignorant..
Your projection now confirmed.
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind wrote:
>>
>> On 1/10/2010 1:15 PM, roger gilbert wrote:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind wrote:
>>>> --Way to go, goober. Keep up the great work..
>>>
>>> Your rage and anger are largely useless.
>>
>> Your false accusations and straw men are baseless..
>
> Nothing false about them.
Nothing provable about them, either, hence a negative claim..
>> --And utterly without merit..
>
> Ripe with merit,
And you'll be proving that when?
--While ignoring the death threats posted by Gummer Ash..
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind was again amused by the posturing primate:
>>
>> On 1/10/2010 1:26 PM, roger gilbert was whining at:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/4/2010 10:55 PM, Gummer Ash was whining at:
>>>> --I suppose you thought you'd get by with a CB radio, hunh?
>>>
>>> Your need to retreat
>>
>> Your sockpuppetry is noted and logged..
>
> Your identical cover is documented
*>LOL!<* You're again making excuses for your threats
and evasions, that were documented earlier..
>> --Your evasions are still amusingly ignorant..
>
> Your projection
Keep telling on yourself..
--goober..
HH&C
wrote:
> On 1/11/2010 12:07 PM, roger gilbert wrote:
>
>
> >> On 1/10/2010 1:15 PM, roger gilbert wrote:
>
> ---
> >>>> --Way to go, goober. Keep up the great work..
>
> >>> Your rage and anger are largely useless.
>
> >> Your false accusations and straw men are baseless..
>
> > Nothing false about them.
>
> Nothing provable about them, either, hence a negative claim..
You seem angry.
Do you feel angry?
> >> --And utterly without merit..
>
> > Ripe with merit,
>
> And you'll be proving that when?
Over-ripe. Past prime.
> --While ignoring the death threats posted by Gunner Ash.
Gunner has never threatened me. Has he threatened to play banjo for
you?
roger gilbert
> On 1/11/2010 12:07 PM, roger gilbert wrote:
>>
>> Man_of_Mind wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/10/2010 1:15 PM, roger gilbert wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Man_of_Mind wrote:
> ---
>>>>> --Way to go, goober. Keep up the great work..
>>>>
>>>> Your rage and anger are largely useless.
>>>
>>> Your false accusations and straw men are baseless..
>>
>> Nothing false about them.
>
> Nothing provable about them, either, hence a negative claim..
Everything proven and documented, in _your_ own words, hater.
>>> --And utterly without merit..
>>
>> Ripe with merit,
>
> And you'll be proving that when?
You did that for me, hater.
> --While ignoring the death threats posted by Gummer Ash..
Gummer's hallucinations are irrelevant.
Your hate and anger are on display.
roger gilbert
> On 1/11/2010 12:08 PM, roger gilbert whimpered and groveled:
>>
>> Man_of_Mind was again amused by the posturing primate:
>>>
>>> On 1/10/2010 1:26 PM, roger gilbert was whining at:
>>>>
>>>> Man_of_Mind wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/4/2010 10:55 PM, Gummer Ash was whining at:
> ----
>>>>> --I suppose you thought you'd get by with a CB radio, hunh?
>>>>
>>>> Your need to retreat
>>>
>>> Your sockpuppetry is noted and logged..
>>
>> Your identical cover is documented
>
> *>LOL!<* You're again making excuses for your threats
> and evasions, that were documented earlier..
You deny being a sock?
>>> --Your evasions are still amusingly ignorant..
>>
>> Your projection
>
> Keep telling on yourself..
After telling on you.
> --goober..
That's your best insult?
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind was still laughing at the fallacy 'logic' posted by:
>>
>> On 1/11/2010 12:07 PM, dodger dilbert wrote:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Man_of_Mind wrote:
-----
>>>>>> --Way to go, goober. Keep up the great work..
>>>>>
>>>>> Your rage and anger are largely useless.
>>>>
>>>> Your false accusations and straw men are baseless..
>>>
>>> Nothing false about them.
>>
>> Nothing provable about them, either, hence a negative claim..
>
> Everything proven and documented
Still nothing proven, just another false insinuation..
>>>> --And utterly without merit..
>>>
>>> Ripe with merit,
>>
>> And you'll be proving that when?
>
> You did that for me
Nope, you're still at grade-school insinuations..
>> --While ignoring the death threats posted by Gummer Ash..
>
> Gummer's hallucinations are irrelevant.
So, you won't be adding to the discussion, either..
--Thought so..
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind continued laughing at the fallacy 'logic' posted by:
>>
>> On 1/11/2010 12:08 PM, dodger dilbert whimpered and groveled:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind was again amused by the posturing primate:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Man_of_Mind wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/4/2010 10:55 PM, Gummer Ash was whining at:
------
>>>>>> --I suppose you thought you'd get by with a CB radio, hunh?
>>>>>
>>>>> Your need to retreat
>>>>
>>>> Your sockpuppetry is noted and logged..
>>>
>>> Your identical cover is documented
>>
>> *>LOL!<* You're again making excuses for your threats
>> and evasions, that were documented earlier..
>
> You deny being a sock?
Have you stopped beating your wife yet?
--That's the same kind of rhetorical question, goober..
roger gilbert
> On 1/12/2010 12:04 AM, dodger dilbert whined/opined:
>>
>> Man_of_Mind was still laughing at the fallacy 'logic' posted by:
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2010 12:07 PM, dodger dilbert wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Man_of_Mind wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/10/2010 1:15 PM, dodger dilbert wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Man_of_Mind wrote:
> -----
>>>>>>> --Way to go, goober. Keep up the great work..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your rage and anger are largely useless.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your false accusations and straw men are baseless..
>>>>
>>>> Nothing false about them.
>>>
>>> Nothing provable about them, either, hence a negative claim..
>>
>> Everything proven and documented
>
> Still nothing proven, just another false insinuation..
Your posting history here confirms the observation as accurate.
>>>>> --And utterly without merit..
>>>>
>>>> Ripe with merit,
>>>
>>> And you'll be proving that when?
>>
>> You did that for me
>
> Nope, you're still at grade-school insinuations..
You have posted adequate levels of animus to confirm my observation.
>
>>> --While ignoring the death threats posted by Gummer Ash..
>>
>> Gummer's hallucinations are irrelevant.
>
> So, you won't be adding to the discussion, either..
Gummer bears no discussion, he's observably off-kilter.
> --Thought so..
If you truly seek assistance in excoriating him it bears ill on your own
skills in debate. He's a lightweight.
roger gilbert
Noting your unwillingness to admit to using multiple socks.
> --That's the same kind of rhetorical question, goober..
There is no rhetoric in noting your multiple socks.
Gunner Asch
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> --Way to go, goober. Keep up the great work..
>>
>> Your rage and anger are largely useless.
>
>Your false accusations and straw men are baseless..
>
>--And utterly without merit..
Im back home after 2 weeks on the road.
Im not seeing anything regarding when you will arrive.....have you
posted the date yet?
Gunner
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the
means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not
making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of
it. In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different
countries, that the more public provisions were made for the
poor the less they provided for themselves, and of course became
poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the
more they did for themselves, and became richer." -- Benjamin
Franklin, /The Encouragement of Idleness/, 1766
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind was amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>
>> On 1/10/2010 1:15 PM, dodger glibert writhed in denials:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slapping bestowed upon:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/8/2010 12:22 AM, Retief courageously deleted and bleated:
>>>>>
>>>>> Man_of_Mind restored the following quoted text:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/7/2010 11:25 PM, Retief courageously deleted and bleated:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind restored the following quoted text:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/5/2010 7:44 PM, Strabo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind was castigating the one-dimensional chatter from:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/2010 8:58 AM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind continued laughing at the "manly' chest thumping posted by:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/2010 1:35 AM, Gummer Ash continued wheedling and dissembling:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Widdle Kur is spouting off all sorts of things he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> recently read in somones left behind SOF!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You referring to that 'zine for the arm-chair commando mindset?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --Gads! You really are a soft-headed right-wing zealot..
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Shrug..its your the one getting all puffed up
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I see that you've again failed to address what I've mentioned..
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --How is your "great Cull" going to do without communications?
>>>>>>>>>> *>LOL!<*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What in the hell are you arguing about?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Field communications.. Got any?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dammit Gunner, your page didn't have any Quantum Field Theory
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You obviously understand nothing about such..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Keep telling on yourself, goober..
>>>>>
>>>>> "Man_of_Mind" once again altered the posting,
>>>>
>>>> You're again attempting to dodge where your insinuations and
>>>> personal attacks failed you, so you deleted the refutations
>>>> of your simple-minded character smears and pathetic epithets..
>>>>
>>>> So, I've restored them, and all you can do is whine about it..
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your rage and anger are largely useless.
>>
>> Your false accusations and straw men are baseless..
>>
>> --And utterly without merit..
>
> Im back home after 2 weeks on the road.
They let you back out of the hospital again?
> Im not seeing anything regarding when you will arrive
That's for me to know, and you to find out, isn't it..
--You've avoided several such 'appointments' in the recent past..
HH&C
I'm surprised that Observer isn't here correcting your punctuation
errors. He's funny like that, especially when he flubs it up.
Gunner Asch
So. Cal is a "hospital"? Fascinating!
>> Im not seeing anything regarding when you will arrive
>
>That's for me to know, and you to find out, isn't it..
>
>--You've avoided several such 'appointments' in the recent past..
Again you lie. Pity. You really have no shame, or brains, do you?
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind was still amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>
>> On 1/17/2010 8:13 AM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind was amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/10/2010 1:15 PM, dodger glibert writhed in denials:
>>>>>
>>>>> Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slapping bestowed upon:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/8/2010 12:22 AM, Retief courageously deleted and bleated:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind restored the following quoted text:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/7/2010 11:25 PM, Retief courageously deleted and bleated:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind restored the following quoted text:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/2010 7:44 PM, Strabo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind was castigating the one-dimensional chatter from:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/2010 8:58 AM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind continued laughing at the "manly' chest thumping posted by:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/2010 1:35 AM, Gummer Ash continued wheedling and dissembling:
Well, mental ward comes to mind..
>>> Im not seeing anything regarding when you will arrive
>>
>> That's for me to know, and you to find out, isn't it..
>>
>> --You've avoided several such 'appointments' in the recent past..
>
> Again you lie
*>chuckling<* There've been several cases mentioned while
you were away hiding from your creditors and tax collectors..
----And when you ask for trouble, you split like a damp paper sack..
Observer
What's not surprising is that you still have your nose firmly planted
in my ass.
__
The last official act of any government is the looting of the nation.
Gunner Asch
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> So. Cal is a "hospital"?
>
>Well, mental ward comes to mind..
True indeed. It is Democrat controlled and governed isnt it.?
>
>>>> Im not seeing anything regarding when you will arrive
>>>
>>> That's for me to know, and you to find out, isn't it..
>>>
>>> --You've avoided several such 'appointments' in the recent past..
>>
>> Again you lie
>
>*>chuckling<* There've been several cases mentioned while
>you were away hiding from your creditors and tax collectors..
Really? Cites?
>
>----And when you ask for trouble, you split like a damp paper sack..
So when will you arrive?
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind was still amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>
>> On 1/17/2010 5:22 PM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind was still amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/17/2010 8:13 AM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>>>
>>>>> Man_of_Mind was amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/10/2010 1:15 PM, dodger glibert writhed in denials:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slapping bestowed upon:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/8/2010 12:22 AM, Retief courageously deleted and bleated:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind restored the following quoted text:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/7/2010 11:25 PM, Retief courageously deleted and bleated:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind restored the following quoted text:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/2010 7:44 PM, Strabo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind was castigating the one-dimensional chatter from:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
--------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that you've again failed to address what I've mentioned..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --How is your "great Cull" going to do without communications? *>LOL!<*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What in the hell are you arguing about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Field communications.. Got any?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dammit Gunner, your page didn't have any Quantum Field Theory
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You obviously understand nothing about such..
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --Keep telling on yourself, goober..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Man_of_Mind" once again altered the posting,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're again attempting to dodge where your insinuations and
>>>>>>>> personal attacks failed you, so you deleted the refutations
>>>>>>>> of your simple-minded character smears and pathetic epithets..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, I've restored them, and all you can do is whine about it..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Way to go, goober. Keep up the great work..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your rage and anger are largely useless.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your false accusations and straw men are baseless..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --And utterly without merit..
>>>>>
>>>>> Im back home after 2 weeks on the road.
>>>>
>>>> They let you back out of the hospital again?
>>>
>>
>> Well, mental ward comes to mind..
>
> True indeed. It is Democrat controlled
It was "controlled" by the Republican Party up until 1992..
Try to keep your facts straight next time, Mark..
>>>>> Im not seeing anything regarding when you will arrive
>>>>
>>>> That's for me to know, and you to find out, isn't it..
>>>>
>>>> --You've avoided several such 'appointments' in the recent past..
>>>
>>> Again you lie
>>
>> *>chuckling<* There've been several cases mentioned while
>> you were away hiding from your creditors and tax collectors..
>>
>> --And when you ask for trouble, you split like a damp paper sack..
>
> Really?
Yeah, really..
--Your intended victims have spoken directly to you about this..
Gunner Asch
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, mental ward comes to mind..
>>
>> True indeed. It is Democrat controlled
>
>It was "controlled" by the Republican Party up until 1992..
Not true in the slightest. <G> Now the question I ask..is in the nearly
20 yrs you claim the Democrats have controlled California..why has it
become the #3 worst hit state in the Union? Doesnt speak well for
Democrat control of any state, does it...given that the top 10 worst hit
states are ALL Democrat controlled...does it?
<VBG>
Seems you guys can even fuck up a wet dream.
>
>Try to keep your facts straight next time, Mark..
>
>>>>>> Im not seeing anything regarding when you will arrive
>>>>>
>>>>> That's for me to know, and you to find out, isn't it..
>>>>>
>>>>> --You've avoided several such 'appointments' in the recent past..
>>>>
>>>> Again you lie
>>>
>>> *>chuckling<* There've been several cases mentioned while
>>> you were away hiding from your creditors and tax collectors..
>>>
>>> --And when you ask for trouble, you split like a damp paper sack..
>>
>> Really?
>
>Yeah, really..
>
>--Your intended victims have spoken directly to you about this..
"MY" victims? Oh..so you are back to misunderstanding Observation with
Threats again.
Well...go ahead and keep showing everyone what a feeble thinker you are.
The rest of the People will be marking their targets...you included..and
waiting for the right moment.
And then you and yours will be dead.
<G>
Works for me.
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slapping bestowed upon:
>>
>> On 1/18/2010 12:00 AM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind was still amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/17/2010 5:22 PM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>>>
>>>>> Man_of_Mind was still amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/17/2010 8:13 AM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind was amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2010 1:15 PM, dodger glibert writhed in denials:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slapping bestowed upon:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/8/2010 12:22 AM, Retief courageously deleted and bleated:
>>>>>>>>>> You're again attempting to dodge where your insinuations and
>>>>>>>>>> personal attacks failed you, so you deleted the refutations
>>>>>>>>>> of your simple-minded character smears and pathetic epithets..
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So, I've restored them, and all you can do is whine about it..
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --Way to go, goober. Keep up the great work..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your rage and anger are largely useless.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your false accusations and straw men are baseless..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --And utterly without merit..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Im back home after 2 weeks on the road.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They let you back out of the hospital again?
>>>>>
>>>>> So. Cal is a "hospital"?
>>>>
>>>
>>> True indeed. It is Democrat controlled
>>
>> It was "controlled" by the Republican Party up until 1992..
>>
>
Incorrect assumptions on you lame behalf do not a cogent
counter-argument make, Marcus..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_California
"Northern California's inland areas, the Central Valley,
and Southern California (outside Los Angeles County) are
Republican areas. Coastal California, including such areas
as Los Angeles County and the San Francisco Bay Area, as
well as Sacramento are mostly Democratic areas. As most of
the population is in Los Angeles County and the San Francisco
Bay Area, California as a whole tends to be liberal.
California was a Republican Party stronghold in Presidential
elections from the 1950s to 1992. During this period, the
Republicans won California in every election except the election
of 1964. Jimmy Carter came close to winning the state in 1976.
In these years, the GOP regularly nominated Californians as
presidential candidates: Richard Nixon in 1960, 1968, and 1972,
and Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984. The immigration of Hispanic
Americans and Asian Americans and migration of northern liberals,
who tend to vote Democratic, and the flight of white, middle and
upper-middle class suburbanites out of the state shifted the
balance in favor of the Democratic Party."
Anything else you'd like to be proven wrong about?
> Now the question I ask..is in the nearly 20 yrs you claim the
> Democrats have controlled California..
Where did I claim that the Democratic Party has "controlled"
the politics of southern California? You wouldn't be indulging
yourself in yet another of your pathetic 'straw-man' arguments,
would you?
*>LOL!<* You still suck at simple arithmetic, too..
>>>>>>> Im not seeing anything regarding when you will arrive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's for me to know, and you to find out, isn't it..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --You've avoided several such 'appointments' in the recent past..
>>>>>
>>>>> Again you lie
>>>>
>>>> *>chuckling<* There've been several cases mentioned while
>>>> you were away hiding from your creditors and tax collectors..
>>>>
>>>> --And when you ask for trouble, you split like a damp paper sack..
>>>
>>> Really?
>>
>> Yeah, really..
>>
>> --Your intended victims have spoken directly to you about this..
>
> "MY" victims?
Calling your personal threats of death and torture come very
close to the working definition of 'terrorist activity', Mark..
Example follows..
> The rest of the People will be marking their targets...you included
>..and waiting for the right moment.
>
> And then you and yours will be dead.
Nope, you and yours will be in prison, and your presumptions
of some imagined superiority will be the laughing stock of an
entire world..
--You'd should probably get your personal affairs in order..
Gunner Asch
I notice you avoided the state government, but only showed that
Californians voted for a Republican Pres a few times.
Not even a good effort on your part.
>
>> Now the question I ask..is in the nearly 20 yrs you claim the
>> Democrats have controlled California..
>
>Where did I claim that the Democratic Party has "controlled"
>the politics of southern California? You wouldn't be indulging
>yourself in yet another of your pathetic 'straw-man' arguments,
>would you?
The Democraps HAVE controlled California for many many years.
<G> And you simply tried to walk around it.
>
>*>LOL!<* You still suck at simple arithmetic, too..
And you cant tell lies worth a shit.
>
>>>>>>>> Im not seeing anything regarding when you will arrive
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's for me to know, and you to find out, isn't it..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --You've avoided several such 'appointments' in the recent past..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Again you lie
>>>>>
>>>>> *>chuckling<* There've been several cases mentioned while
>>>>> you were away hiding from your creditors and tax collectors..
>>>>>
>>>>> --And when you ask for trouble, you split like a damp paper sack..
>>>>
>>>> Really?
>>>
>>> Yeah, really..
>>>
>>> --Your intended victims have spoken directly to you about this..
>>
>> "MY" victims?
>
>Calling your personal threats of death and torture come very
>close to the working definition of 'terrorist activity', Mark..
Which threats are those
>
>Example follows..
>
>> The rest of the People will be marking their targets...you included
>>..and waiting for the right moment.
>>
>> And then you and yours will be dead.
Yes? And my participation is where in the above Observation?
Laugh laugh laugh...you are STILL having problems with that Observation
thingy arent you?
>
>Nope, you and yours will be in prison, and your presumptions
>of some imagined superiority will be the laughing stock of an
>entire world..
In prison? For what?
>
>--You'd should probably get your personal affairs in order..
They are. And yours? <G>....since you will be gone in less than 2
yrs...one hopes you have done the right thing and at least assigned an
executor to authorize cleaning out your basement quarters and so forth.
Gunner
The current Democratic party has lost its ideological basis for
existence.
- It is NOT fiscally responsible.
- It is NOT ethically honorable.
- It has started wars based on lies.
- It does not support the well-being of americans - only billionaires.
- It has suppresed constitutional guaranteed liberties.
- It has foisted a liar as president upon America.
- It has violated US national sovereignty in trade treaties.
- It has refused to enforce the national borders.
...It no longer has valid reasons to exist.
Lorad474
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind was exploiting the sociopathy exhibited by:
>>
>> On 1/18/2010 3:00 PM, Gummer Ash was still whining because of:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slapping bestowed upon:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/18/2010 12:00 AM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>>>
>>>>> Man_of_Mind was still amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/17/2010 5:22 PM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind was still amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>>>>>>>
---------
I noticed that you haven't cited anything to support your
inane counter-arguments. Pathetic, on your behalf..
>>> Now the question I ask..is in the nearly 20 yrs you claim the
>>> Democrats have controlled California..
>>
>> Where did I claim that the Democratic Party has "controlled"
>> the politics of southern California? You wouldn't be indulging
>> yourself in yet another of your pathetic 'straw-man' arguments,
>> would you?
>
> The [Democratic Party] HAVE controlled California for many many years.
Prove it..
>> *>LOL!<* You still suck at simple arithmetic, too..
>
> And you cant tell lies worth a shit.
That's because I don't tell lies, but you on the other hand..
>>>>>>>>> Im not seeing anything regarding when you will arrive
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's for me to know, and you to find out, isn't it..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --You've avoided several such 'appointments' in the recent past..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Again you lie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *>chuckling<* There've been several cases mentioned while
>>>>>> you were away hiding from your creditors and tax collectors..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --And when you ask for trouble, you split like a damp paper sack..
>>>>>
>>>>> Really?
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, really..
>>>>
>>>> --Your intended victims have spoken directly to you about this..
>>>
>>> "MY" victims?
>>
>> Calling your personal threats of death and torture come very
>> close to the working definition of 'terrorist activity', Mark..
>
> Which threats are those
You'll see..
>> Example follows..
>>
>>> The rest of the People will be marking their targets...you included
>>> ..and waiting for the right moment.
>>>
>>> And then you and yours will be dead.
>
> Yes? And my participation
Your 'observations" are somewhat biased, if not touted as fact..
That's called seditious remarks, in case you needed an adult
to explain it for you again..
>> Nope, you and yours will be in prison, and your presumptions
>> of some imagined superiority will be the laughing stock of an
>> entire world..
>
> In prison? For what?
You'll see..
>> --You'd should probably get your personal affairs in order..
>
> They are.
Oh, that's right, you've had a triple bypass and a stroke..
You're just 'fit as a fiddle' aren't you? *>LOL!<*
> The current Republican party has lost its ideological basis for
> existence.
>
> - It is NOT fiscally responsible.
> - It is NOT ethically honorable.
> - It has started wars based on lies.
> - It does not support the well-being of americans - only billionaires.
> - It has suppresed constitutional guaranteed liberties.
> - It has foisted a liar as president upon America.
> - It has violated US national sovereignty in trade treaties.
> - It has refused to enforce the national borders.
--Corrected your poor spelling again, no charge..
Gunner Asch
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> --Your intended victims have spoken directly to you about this..
>>>>
>>>> "MY" victims?
>>>
>>> Calling your personal threats of death and torture come very
>>> close to the working definition of 'terrorist activity', Mark..
>>
>> Which threats are those
>
>You'll see..
So you dont have any examples?
>
>>> Example follows..
>>>
>>>> The rest of the People will be marking their targets...you included
>>>> ..and waiting for the right moment.
>>>>
>>>> And then you and yours will be dead.
>>
>> Yes? And my participation
>
>Your 'observations" are somewhat biased, if not touted as fact..
Biased or simply not acceptable to a walking dead man?
>
>That's called seditious remarks, in case you needed an adult
>to explain it for you again..
But you claimed it was Treason. Make up your mind, Leftard. I know its
hard to make those 3 neurons fire together..but geeze.
>
>>> Nope, you and yours will be in prison, and your presumptions
>>> of some imagined superiority will be the laughing stock of an
>>> entire world..
>>
>> In prison? For what?
>
>You'll see..
So once again you have no examples.
>
>>> --You'd should probably get your personal affairs in order..
>>
>> They are.
>
>Oh, that's right, you've had a triple bypass and a stroke..
>
>You're just 'fit as a fiddle' aren't you? *>LOL!<*
I am now. Modern Medicine is marvelous. And because Im a Democrat..the
rest of you paid for it. Thanks!
>
>> The current Democrat party has lost its ideological basis for
>> existence.
>>
>> - It is NOT fiscally responsible.
>> - It is NOT ethically honorable.
>> - It has started wars based on lies.
>> - It does not support the well-being of americans - only billionaires.
>> - It has suppresed constitutional guaranteed liberties.
>> - It has foisted a liar as president upon America.
>> - It has violated US national sovereignty in trade treaties.
>> - It has refused to enforce the national borders.
>
>--Corrected your poor spelling again, no charge..
Which word?
Gunner
The current Democratic party has lost its ideological basis for
existence.
- It is NOT fiscally responsible.
- It is NOT ethically honorable.
- It has started wars based on lies.
- It does not support the well-being of americans - only billionaires.
- It has suppresed constitutional guaranteed liberties.
- It has foisted a liar as president upon America.
- It has violated US national sovereignty in trade treaties.
- It has refused to enforce the national borders.
...It no longer has valid reasons to exist.
Lorad474
Man_of_Mind
>
> Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slapping bestowed upon:
>>
>> On 1/19/2010 1:36 PM, Gummer Ash continued whining because of:
>>>
>>> Man_of_Mind was exploiting the sociopathy exhibited by:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/18/2010 3:00 PM, Gummer Ash was still whining because of:
>>>>>
>>>>> Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slapping bestowed upon:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/18/2010 12:00 AM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind was still amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/17/2010 5:22 PM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently at:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Man_of_Mind was still amused at the cowardice exhibited by:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/17/2010 8:13 AM, Gummer Ash continued whining impotently:
And then deleted the entire text, for lack of an answer..
*>LOL!<* Brave Sir Gummer bravely ran away..
>>>>> Now the question I ask..is in the nearly 20 yrs you claim the
>>>>> Democrats have controlled California..
>>>>
>>>> Where did I claim that the Democratic Party has "controlled"
>>>> the politics of southern California? You wouldn't be indulging
>>>> yourself in yet another of your pathetic 'straw-man' arguments,
>>>> would you?
>>>
>>> The [Democratic Party] HAVE controlled California for many many years.
>>
>> Prove it..
>>
>>>> *>LOL!<* You still suck at simple arithmetic, too..
>>>
>>> And you cant tell lies worth a shit.
>>
>> That's because I don't tell lies, but you on the other hand..
*>cricket.wav<*
>>>>>>>>>>> Im not seeing anything regarding when you will arrive
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's for me to know, and you to find out, isn't it..
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --You've avoided several such 'appointments' in the recent past..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Again you lie
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *>chuckling<* There've been several cases mentioned while
>>>>>>>> you were away hiding from your creditors and tax collectors..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --And when you ask for trouble, you split like a damp paper sack..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, really..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Your intended victims have spoken directly to you about this..
>>>>>
>>>>> "MY" victims?
>>>>
>>>> Calling your personal threats of death and torture come very
>>>> close to the working definition of 'terrorist activity', Mark..
>>>
>>> Which threats are those
>>
>> You'll see..
>
> So you dont have any examples?
I have plenty of examples of you making indirect threats and
deliberate 'invitations' to violence enacted by yourself, with
premeditation self-evident.. Do you think you could dig your
own grave any deeper?
>>>> Example follows..
>>>>
>>>>> The rest of the People will be marking their targets...you included
>>>>> ..and waiting for the right moment.
>>>>>
>>>>> And then you and yours will be dead.
>>>
>>> Yes? And my participation
>>
>> Your 'observations" are somewhat biased, if not touted as fact..
>
> Biased or simply not acceptable to a walking dead man?
You're the one that digging his own grave, Mark..
>> That's called seditious remarks, in case you needed an adult
>> to explain it for you again..
>
> But you claimed it was Treason.
You've already forgotten the definitions for 'sedition'?
My, what a short attention span you 'frightie-righties' have..
>>>> Nope, you and yours will be in prison, and your presumptions
>>>> of some imagined superiority will be the laughing stock of an
>>>> entire world..
>>>
>>> In prison? For what?
>>
>> You'll see..
>>
>>>> --You'd should probably get your personal affairs in order..
>>>
>>> They are.
>>
>> Oh, that's right, you've had a triple bypass and a stroke..
>>
>> You're just 'fit as a fiddle' aren't you? *>LOL!<*
>
> I am now
Nah, you're still mending, it takes about two years before you
stop feeling like a sewed together basketball, with all the
adhesions you have present. Small wonder you're sniveling
like a big swinging dick, making grand pronouncements about
how you're going to survive your own demise..
That's just how you insecure militant-dilettantes are..
>>> The current Republican party has lost its ideological basis for
>>> existence.
>>>
>>> - It is NOT fiscally responsible.
>>> - It is NOT ethically honorable.
>>> - It has started wars based on lies.
>>> - It does not support the well-being of americans - only billionaires.
>>> - It has suppressed constitutional guaranteed liberties.
>>> - It has foisted a liar as president upon America.
>>> - It has violated US national sovereignty in trade treaties.
>>> - It has refused to enforce the national borders.
>>
>> --Corrected your poor spelling again, no charge..
>
> Which word?
"suppressed", you ambitiously ignorant poseur..
--Keep digging your own grave, little net-pet..