On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 21:26:35 -0500, nospam wrote:
> it's not the phone that's the problem, it's the case.
Hi nospam,
For the second time today, I'm pleasantly surprised that you responded like
a normal purposefully helpful adult in two ways (are you feeling ok?)...
1. You didn't just blindly deny everything (e.g., like Alan Baker does)
2. You responded to the facts of the matter (even with logic and sense)
I appreciate that as it's what adults habitually do.
o Note: My strategy, always, is to mirror the presumed intent of the poster
As for the case, I don't doubt that some cases are good & some must suck.
o Me? I am brutal on phones, so I _love_ my cases & screen protectors
I broke my last screen protector simply by biting down on it while I was up
on the roof on a ladder and I didn't have enough hands to snap a photo.
> some cases cover more of the front surface than others, and in some
> cases, cover enough of the edge to where it can cause touch issues at
> the periphery. the bulkier ones often have a steep rake, making it even
> more annoying.
>
> other cases have no issue whatsoever.
Understood.
In the case of the Moto G7, there's a slight bevel to the native screen
o And there's a notch such that the screen protector has to go around it
The case, in my case, is all rubber with external plastic reinforcement
o However, I've dropped it so many times that the plastic is partly busted
But the rubber has a lip which seems (so far) to have protected the glass
o But, as you logically noted, nothing is gonna protect a hit on the glass'
My main point in this thread was to bring the FACTS to the fore of the
glass as tested by _independent_ testers (i.e., not by Apple MARKETING).
My main fault with, for example, Steve, is he never seems to check facts
o My main fault with, for example, Lewis, is he's a cultist par excellence
Neither is good.
o A lot of folks think I'm hard on Apple but that's 'cuz I believe in facts
I generally don't believe the MARKETING claims that Apple glass is better
than everyone elses' glass, although the iPhone 12 did have a better
hardness than most, but its scratch resistance was just normal.
Plus, the back is glass, which just sucks in my humblest of opinions.
o I realize a lot of people care how a glass phone "feels" in their hands
But all I care about is how the phone works in my hands.
o The less glass it has (i.e., on the back), the better.
Back to independent tests, I could look up more, but this one I quoted:
o The results are, well, underwhelming, based on the MARKETING hype (IMHO).
The iPhone 12 had significantly better force resistance:
o iPhone 11 screen cracked at 352 Newtons
o iPhone 12 screen cracked at 442 Newtons
But the Mohs hardness was about the same on all counts:
o iPhone 11 front screen scratched at #7 Mohs
o iPhone 12 front screen scratched at #7 Mohs
o iPhone 11 back glass scratched at #7 Mohs
o iPhone 12 back glass scratched at #7 Mohs
o iPhone 11 camera lens scratched at #8 Mohs
o iPhone 12 camera lens scratched at #8 Mohs
--