In response to what Alan Baker <
notony...@no.no.no.no> wrote :
> One actual adult question:
>
> Why do you claim things as facts...
>
> ...that aren't actually fact?
Savageduck,
I'm an adult.
o If I claim a fact is a fact - then it's a fact.
*Name a _single_ fact, I've said is a fact, that you claim was wrong?*
o Name just one.
Back that up with even a _single_ fact, Savageduck.
o Notice, imaginary belief systems are based on exactly _zero_ (0) facts.
If you can't find one, in my many thousands of posts, then I claim your
belief system is based on exactly zero (0) facts.
Of all the apologists other than Steve and potentially nospam, you actually
"can" contribute value, particularly to the rec.photo.digital ng and
somewhat to the Mac ng, if not so much to the iOS newsgroups.
So losing your input (on photo stuff) or Steve's (on iOS) stuff is a
detriment, where it seems both of you don't know the difference between:
o Fact
o Assessment
Here's an example of the difference, albeit slightly tongue in cheek:
o Fact: New vulnerabilities have been detected in Apple's Image I/O.
o Assessment: Apple didn't test their software as well as Google did.
Adults can reasonably disagree on assessments (adults are funny that way);
but adults should never disagree on facts (facts are funny that way).
Here's another example of fact versus assessment:
o Fact: I posted about reported bugs being detected in Apple's Image I/O.
o Assessment: Not a single response in this thread is on that topic.
By way of example, another way of assessing the _same_ facts, could be:
o Fact: I posted about reported bugs being detected in Apple's Image I/O.
o Assessment: The apologists who posted didn't address the facts.
Yet another way of assessing the same facts, might be:
o Fact: I posted about reported bugs being detected in Apple's Image I/O.
o Assessment: The apologists attacked me, which proves they hate facts.
Of all the people posting to this thread, Savageduck, only you and Steve
even remotely have the mental capacity to comprehend the difference between
(Steve far more so than you, but you're far more intelligent than are most
apologists, save for nospam).
o Fact
o Assessment
Do you _understand_ the simple things I'm conveying to you, Savageduck?
What you disagree with are my assessments, because nobody who is an adult
can possibly disagree with the facts (facts are funny that way).
By way of contrast, it's a bonus to all adults when utter morons like Joerg
Lorenz, Lewis, Your Name, and particularly Alan Baker who simply calls all
facts lies. (Note: The apologist nospam is in a special category, since he
actually is well aware of exactly what he says, but he has no compunctions
whatsoever of making claims that he has no plans on backing up - and he
never once has backed them up with facts).
None of them can even agree on the facts, e.g., the Joeorg Lorenz told all
of us he doesn't believe facts published by any media other than German
media.
Here's another example of facts versus assessment:
o Fact: Joerg Lorenz told us he believes only in facts from German media.
o Assessment: Joerg Lorenz will be immune to facts published elsewhere.
Since you and Steve are the rare apologists worth my effort (nospam is a
completely lost cause, but I doubt you can be made to comprehend sense
either), I simply ask you a simple adult question which will prove to all
whether you own a completely imaginary belief system, or not.
*Name a _single_ fact, I've said is a fact, that you claim was wrong?*
o Name just one.
--
Apologists can't even tell the difference between a fact and an assessment.