*You have to _read_ how "purposefully helpful" these apologists truly are!*
BTW, for the photo & Windows newsgroup, below is the post I responded to
where you can sympathize with us adults who are purposefully helpful that
we have to incessantly deal with these TYPE III apologists like Alan Baker,
Jolly Roger, Lewis, et al., just to get even the simplest tasks done with
iOS & Windows with respect to copying over photos.
TYPE I apologists: (e.g., nospam)
o They know the most.
o But they will _always_ defend Apple MARKETING with their very life.
o Such that their credibility is no better than a coin toss result.
(And yet, nospam doesn't believe a single word of what he says.)
Type III apologists: (e.g., sms)
o They're not malicious like the other two types.
o But they never seem to bother to check their facts.
o Such that their credibility is akin to predicting a card-game outcome.
(For example, Steve _still_ thinks Qualcomm royalties went down.)
Type III apologists: (e.g., Jolly Roger)
o They are the true Jim-Jones cultists of the Apple MARKETING mantra.
o They take any fact about Apple as a personal affront to their self worth.
o What's petrifying is that they actually _believe_ everything they say!
(Worse, they viciously and personally attack any adult who happens
to speak a fact which they _hate_ about Apple products,
because those facts actually are a DANGER to their entire self worth.)
See also the 7 responses to fact (none of which are adult) of apologists:
Since Jolly Roger sets the no-archive bit, you won't find this in Google
archives, but you will find it in the narkives:
o <
http://rec.photo.digital.narkive.com>
o <
http://alt.comp.os.windows-10.narkive.com>
o <
http://misc.phone.mobile.iphone.narkive.com>
You have to _read_ how "purposefully helpful" these apologists truly are!
o This is Jolly Roger's post in its entirety.
NOTE: If you're thinking Dunning Kruger 1st quadrant, you'd be correct.
On 2020-10-20, badgolferman <
REMOVETHISb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jolly Roger <
jolly...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> On 2020-10-20, badgolferman <
REMOVETHISb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> At least nospam blamed your equipment. Wait for Lewis or Jolly
>>> Roger to come along and blame your intelligence.
>>
>> LOL...
>>
>> If you dip shits didn't come to the Apple newsgroups to troll them so
>> often, people would be more friendly and willing to help. But since
>> you choose to troll here, you will just have to deal with the
>> consequences of your choice.
>>
>> And let's be real: What does it say about your intelligence when you
>> can't even figure out how to do something as brain-dead simple as
>> transferring photos from an iPhone to a Windows PC over WiFi? How
>> fucking inept are you, anyway?
>>
>> A simple two-second web search is all it took for me to find a
>> suitable solution that lets me transfer photos over WiFi from my
>> iPhone to Windows 10.
>>
>> Sit and spin for all I care. You look like complete FOOLS to everyone
>> who knows better. : D
>
> The question was how to transfer photos by WiFi from iPhone to PC
> *WITHOUT* third party software.
Which is ridiculous considering Microsoft *has* *no* built-in support
for photo synchronization with iPhones in Windows, and they killed
Photos Companion which *did*` sync photos from both Android and iOS
over WiFi. *OF COURSE* third-party software of some type is required.
The OP even mentioned that he had used third-party software in the
initial post for fuck's sake.
> Since the two devices are attached to the same network the question
> was how can you make them be connected and use a file manager from the
> PC to copy the photos.
Nope, the question was *not* strictly about file managers. The OP
mentioned other apps, such as Windows Photos, and Copytrans Photos, a
*THIRD* *PARTY* *APP* - *OH* *MY*!
> Apple already provides similar functionality with AirPrint so why not
> direct copy?
You must mean AirDrop. And no, Apple isn't obligated to support AirDrop
as a built-in feature of other platforms. Get fucking real. If *anyone*
should be providing support, it's Microsoft. And they did, but then they
killed it. See above.
> Instead of continuing to be a smug asshole why not try something
> different and be helpful instead? It might even make you feel
> better...
Nah. All you dip shits do here is spend weeks creating huge, laborious
troll threads often cross-posted to advocacy and other unrelated
newsgroups, going endlessly back and forth trying to find the most
*complicated* ways to do the *simplest* things the rest of us do with
*ease* day in and day out because we don't hamstring ourselves with
inferior devices/computers. Then you turn around and call the rest of us
"ApoLoGiStS!!! *SPITTLE* *COUGH* *WHEEZE*" for daring to suggest there's
a better way, and whine that we are "smug assholes" when we don't bend
over backwards to help your sorry asses get simple things done, but with
your asinine restrictions. For all the rest of us care, you can drown in
your stupidity.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.
JR