In misc.news.internet.discuss, JAB <he...@is.invalid> wrote:
> Michael Trew <
mt99...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> why would they continue to put in the extra work to get spit on?
> Rules of engagement are well known...no excuses when exceeded.
> Can't say what happened in Portland, but advancement tends to be based
> upon a person's "actions."
>
> LEOs are paid very good these days...not true in Frank Serpico's days.
Serpico[*] was NYPD. Currently in NYPD you can "retire" on a full
pension after twenty years, and I believe retirement benefits are based
on last year's salary including overtime. It would not surprise me if
other places had similar rules.
So that's two things at play: racing to get advancement to lock in
higher base pay and finally padding out last year to lock in higher
retirement pay.
I put the quotes on "retire" because there's nothing stopping the ex-cop
from getting another job, sometimes even still in law enforcement.
> Frank Serpico - is best known for whistleblowing on police corruption
> in the late 1960s and early 1970s [...]
>
> <
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Serpico>
Coincidentally, I just watched the _Serpico_ film about two weeks ago.
Al Pacino seems to dress completely differently in every scene. I bet he
had fun with the costume department.
Elijah
------
https://www.justwatch.com/us/movie/serpico