Novins v. Cannon - Epic Kook Fail
Aratzio
Coming down to the stretch in the Novins v Cannon KookSoot. Novins has
until the end of day tomorrow to refile his KookSoot or the "Dismissed
with Prejudice" will appear on nice tidy legal documents.
Will Novins have the balls to apologize for being such a gormless
wankstain or will he just remain in hiding, licking those suppurating
self-inflicted wounds.
Next up, he answers in federal court for his own actions.
Aratzio
alt.usenet.kooks, JR <nydai...@yahoo.com> got double secret
probation for writing:
>Any action on the counterclaims?
Gregory Hall
news:h7sog5t4jbqmnjt3s...@4ax.com...
>
> "Next up, he answers in federal court for his own actions."
What, for filing a lawsuit? I don't think filing a lawsuit is against the
law.
--
Gregory Hall
ah
No; but, it's amusing as all-get-out ;)
--
a 'http://soma.fm/' h
Aratzio
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
writing:
>"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
It is a crime that sharing such a large amount of stupid in such a
short post is not painful.
Kadaitcha Man
> He's consistent, that's for sure
Think deeply about this, Frad:
If stupidity were painful, Bullis would be a genius.
Aratzio
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.spam> got
double secret probation for writing:
>On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:17:38 -0600, Fred Hall wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:22:45 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:52:50 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
>>>writing:
>>>
>>>>"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:h7sog5t4jbqmnjt3s...@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Next up, he answers in federal court for his own actions."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What, for filing a lawsuit? I don't think filing a lawsuit is against
>>>>the law.
>>>
>>>It is a crime that sharing such a large amount of stupid in such a short
>>>post is not painful.
>>
>> He's consistent, that's for sure
>
>Think deeply about this, Frad:
>
>If stupidity were painful, Bullis would be a genius.
err, no, just in a lot more pain than anyone else.
Aratzio
Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:22:45 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>He's consistent, that's for sure
To name two:
Barratry
Abuse of Process
Gregory Hall
Idiot! Barratry in legal terms only applies to criminal law. It doesn't
apply to civil suits.
Abuse of process is impossible to prove.
You'd better tell your public defender friend to do some more research.
--
Gregory Hall
ah
ROLF!
If you weren't spending all your time intent upon stuffing the few centimetres
of Novins' disk in your mouth, you /might/ have found time to research the
Subject to some degree of understanding.
Aratzio
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
writing:
>"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>news:tvirg59o2luoupm35...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:17:38 -0600, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>> Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:22:45 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:52:50 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
>>>>writing:
>>>>
>>>>>"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:h7sog5t4jbqmnjt3s...@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Next up, he answers in federal court for his own actions."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>What, for filing a lawsuit? I don't think filing a lawsuit is against
>>>>>the law.
>>>>
>>>>It is a crime that sharing such a large amount of stupid in such a
>>>>short post is not painful.
>>>
>>>He's consistent, that's for sure
>>
>> To name two:
>> Barratry
>> Abuse of Process
>
>
>
>Idiot! Barratry in legal terms only applies to criminal law. It doesn't
>apply to civil suits.
"Barratry, in criminal and civil law, is the act or practice of
bringing repeated legal actions solely to harass. Usually, the actions
brought lack merit. This action has been declared a crime in some
jurisdictions. For example, in the U.S. states of California,
Pennsylvania, Virginia and Washington, barratry is a misdemeanor,
while in Texas, it is a felony"
>
>Abuse of process is impossible to prove.
Which is why there a laws defining it, correct?
>
>You'd better tell your public defender friend to do some more research.
"It is a crime that sharing such a large amount of stupid in such a
short post is not painful."
Your hero failed. Completely and absolutely. He can't even get out
from under his own kooksoot because there have been counterclaims made
against him. He is sorely and without any doubt fucked in every way.
And the best part of it, he did it all to himself.
Poor kooks, their great white dope failed them and it will only get
worse for you.
Aratzio
<splif...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
What fun would that be? Imagine gweggie not stupid, how boring would
he be then?
Gregory Hall
Where did you come up with that definition - a Cracker Jack box. Barratry
simply does not apply for one civil suit.
Please note the word that is very important. 'bringing *repeated* leagal
actions.'
How many did Novin's bring? Huh? I can't hear you. BWahahhahahahahaha.
Can one legal action meet the definition of 'repeated'. Morons!
>>
>>Abuse of process is impossible to prove.
>
> Which is why there a laws defining it, correct?
Proving abuse of anything is next to impossible. Unless the process servers
were totally inept and unless they were acting under the orders of Novins to
abuse those whom they served and unless any of this was provable in a court
of law then, like I said, proving abuse of process is impossible.
>
>>
>>You'd better tell your public defender friend to do some more research.
>
> "It is a crime that sharing such a large amount of stupid in such a
> short post is not painful."
>
>
> Your hero failed. Completely and absolutely. He can't even get out
> from under his own kooksoot because there have been counterclaims made
> against him. He is sorely and without any doubt fucked in every way.
> And the best part of it, he did it all to himself.
>
> Poor kooks, their great white dope failed them and it will only get
> worse for you.
It ain't over until the fat lady sings. All you've got at the present time
is wishful thinking and assumptions. FAIL!
--
Gregory Hall
Smarter than the average barrister.
Aratzio
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Gregory Hall"
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/barratry
http://www.hyperdictionary.com/search.aspx?define=barratry
http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=40
"barratry
n. creating legal business by stirring up disputes and quarrels,
generally for the benefit of the lawyer who sees fees in the matter.
Barratry is illegal in all states and subject to criminal punishment
and/or discipline by the state bar, but there must be a showing that
the resulting lawsuit was totally groundless. There is a lot of
border-line barratry in which attorneys, in the name of being tough or
protecting the client, fail to seek avenues for settlement of disputes
or will not tell the client he/she has no legitimate claim."
He's digging a hole where the rain gets in and stops his mind from
wandering.
"
>
>
>>>
>>>Abuse of process is impossible to prove.
>>
>> Which is why there a laws defining it, correct?
>
>
>Proving abuse of anything is next to impossible. Unless the process servers
>were totally inept and unless they were acting under the orders of Novins to
>abuse those whom they served and unless any of this was provable in a court
>of law then, like I said, proving abuse of process is impossible.
And the stupid just keeps on giving.
>
>>
>>>
>>>You'd better tell your public defender friend to do some more research.
>>
>> "It is a crime that sharing such a large amount of stupid in such a
>> short post is not painful."
>>
>>
>> Your hero failed. Completely and absolutely. He can't even get out
>> from under his own kooksoot because there have been counterclaims made
>> against him. He is sorely and without any doubt fucked in every way.
>> And the best part of it, he did it all to himself.
>>
>> Poor kooks, their great white dope failed them and it will only get
>> worse for you.
>
>
>It ain't over until the fat lady sings. All you've got at the present time
>is wishful thinking and assumptions. FAIL!
"It is a crime that sharing such a large amount of stupid in such a
Aratzio
Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:37:54 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
><greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>
>>Idiot!
>
>Nice self-spnak, net abuser
He is getting a lot of practice these days. Novins & clockbrain had
enough self respect to at least run away and hide.
Kadaitcha Man
Good catch.
~BD~
Yep. Nice one! ;)
ah
Hmm . . . good point.
Keep stuffing, Gweg!
Gregory Hall
news:4b0e74d4$0$77568$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
Keep stuffing what? Novins' *disk*. Bwaahahahahhahhaha. The idiot can't
even spell.
--
Gregory Hall
Aratzio
Gregory Hall
It's not a crime unless there is a law forbidding it. Cite the law or shut
the fuck up.
--
Gregory Hall
Aratzio
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Gregory Hall"
Poor baby, you seem to be taking Novins epic fail rather personally.
If you were not so criminally stupid it wouldn't be so personally
painful.
Gregory Hall
Like I said, it ain't over till the fat lady sings. Novins is just playing
you and your lackluster attorney(s) like a Stradivarius. Right about now you
can be assured Novins is laughing his ass off at you creeps and your
premature gloating.
--
Gregory Hall
Fat Lady Singing
<greg...@home.fake>wrote:
La la LA la....lalalal La la la LALALA
ah
It's your *, Gweg.
ah
La.
ROLF!
ah
ROLF!
ah
Nice flinch, Kunt.
Peter Hucker
> On 11/26/2009 2:18 PM, Fat Lady Singing wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:06:59 -0500, "Gregory Hall"
>> <greg...@home.fake>wrote:
>>
>>> "Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:8fitg55rg901v0lg3...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:13:56 -0500, in the land of
>>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Gregory Hall"
>>>> <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>
>>>>> "Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:5jftg59bbiq3p453d...@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:38:32 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio,
>>>>>> "Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
>>>>>> writing:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "ah" <splif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:4b0e74d4$0$77568$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
<snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Keep stuffing what? Novins' *disk*. Bwaahahahahhahhaha. The idiot can't
>>>>>>> even spell.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is a crime that sharing such a large amount of stupid in such a
>>>>>> short post is not painful.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not a crime unless there is a law forbidding it. Cite the law or shut
>>>>> the fuck up.
>>>>
>>>> Poor baby, you seem to be taking Novins epic fail rather personally.
>>>> If you were not so criminally stupid it wouldn't be so personally
>>>> painful.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Like I said, it ain't over till the fat lady sings. Novins is just playing
>>> you and your lackluster attorney(s) like a Stradivarius. Right about now you
>>> can be assured Novins is laughing his ass off at you creeps and your
>>> premature gloating.
>>
>> La la LA la....lalalal La la la LALALA
>
> La.
>
> ROLF!
He was singing Kylie Minogue. Do NOT make fun again.
--
I'm no. 2623 worldwide in BOINC distributed computing.
Are you contributing? http://boinc.berkeley.edu/
I'm the 78th top alpha tester worldwide for protein research systems.
I'm the 118th top contributor worldwide to extreme weather event research.
I'm the 203rd top contributor worldwide to 2-phase fluid behavior in microgravity and microfluidics computer simulations.
Of course a quad core hyperthreading i7 processor helps....
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com
A nice, calm and respectable lady went into the pharmacy, right up to the pharmacist, looked straight into his eyes, and said, “I would like to buy some cyanide.”The pharmacist asked, “Why in the world do you need cyanide?”
The lady replied, “I need it to poison my husband.”
The pharmacists eyes got big and he exclaimed, “Lord have mercy!
I can’t give you cyanide to kill your husband! That’s against the law!
I’ll lose my license! They’ll throw both of us in jail! All kinds of bad things will happen. Absolutely not! You CANNOT have any cyanide!”
The lady reached into her purse and pulled out a picture of her husband in bed with the pharmacist’s wife.
The pharmacist looked at the picture and replied, “Well now. That’s different. You didn’t tell me you had a prescription.”
ah
> Kylie Minogue
Posh bint.
Peter Hucker
> On 11/28/2009 2:08 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>> Kylie Minogue
>
> Posh bint.
Good songs though.
And I don't remember writing Kylie Minogue.
--
I'm no. 2623 worldwide in BOINC distributed computing.
Are you contributing? http://boinc.berkeley.edu/
I'm the 78th top alpha tester worldwide for protein research systems.
I'm the 118th top contributor worldwide to extreme weather event research.
I'm the 203rd top contributor worldwide to 2-phase fluid behavior in microgravity and microfluidics computer simulations.
Of course a quad core hyperthreading i7 processor helps....
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?
ah
> On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:52:14 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/28/2009 2:08 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> Kylie Minogue
>>
>> Posh bint.
>
> Good songs though.
>
> And I don't remember writing Kylie Minogue.
Daft git.
--
a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
Peter Hucker
> On 12/1/2009 2:41 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:52:14 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/28/2009 2:08 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>> Kylie Minogue
>>>
>>> Posh bint.
>>
>> Good songs though.
>>
>> And I don't remember writing Kylie Minogue.
>
> Daft git.
Forgetful swine if you don't mind.
--
I'm no. 2623 worldwide in BOINC distributed computing.
Are you contributing? http://boinc.berkeley.edu/
I'm the 78th top alpha tester worldwide for protein research systems.
I'm the 118th top contributor worldwide to extreme weather event research.
I'm the 203rd top contributor worldwide to 2-phase fluid behavior in microgravity and microfluidics computer simulations.
Of course a quad core hyperthreading i7 processor helps....
What is the difference between mechanical engineers and civil engineers?
Mechanical engineers build weapons and civil engineers build targets.
ah
> On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:48:55 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/1/2009 2:41 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:52:14 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/28/2009 2:08 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>> Kylie Minogue
>>>>
>>>> Posh bint.
>>>
>>> Good songs though.
>>>
>>> And I don't remember writing Kylie Minogue.
>>
>> Daft git.
>
> Forgetful swine if you don't mind.
H1WHAT1?
Peter Hucker
> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
--
I'm 2623rd worldwide in BOINC distributed computing.
Join here: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/
I'm 78th in protein research systems alpha testing.
And 118th in extreme weather event research.
And 203rd in 2-phase fluid behavior in microgravity and microfluidics computer simulations.
If quizzes are quizzical, what are tests?
ah
> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>
> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
Maybe the Shadow knows?
Peter Hucker
> On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>
>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>
> Maybe the Shadow knows?
What have you been drinking?
--
I'm 2623rd worldwide in BOINC distributed computing.
Join here: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/
I'm 78th in protein research systems alpha testing.
And 118th in extreme weather event research.
And 203rd in 2-phase fluid behavior in microgravity and microfluidics computer simulations.
Researchers have recently unearthed the text of the first transcontinental telegraph message. Reportedly, it reads
ENLARGE YOUR MALE MEMBER STOP GUARANTEED RESULTS STOP ...
ah
> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:08:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>
>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>
>> Maybe the Shadow knows?
>
> What have you been drinking?
Coffee. Why?
"The Great One"
"ah" <splif...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4b1984d0$0$65861$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
Just wondering why there is a "sticky" white substance on your upper-lip !!
--
John C.
�n�hw��f
news:hfd5jg$303$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 01:13:46 -0600, "\"The Great One\""
> <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
>> "sticky" white substance
>
> There you go again
>
>
Worst Closet Case Ever
Word.
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
Lady Veteran
>On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>
>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>
>Maybe the Shadow knows?
Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
he intended. Popgun hasn't posted anymore since then and if he does I
think he will watch him "mouth."
You all can take a lesson from this. If you win the suit you still
have to pay your lawyer. Remember that there are real live people
behind these keyboards and hiding behind anonymous German servers and
remailers will not always keep Kevlar on your bottom.
LV
"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."
---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
--------------------------------------------
"Some people are only alive because it is
illegal to kill them."
---Anonymous
----------------------------------------------
How does your idiocy measure up?
My Blog http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------------
Are you being harassed on Usenet and want to fight
back instead of leaving the net? Are you willing to
stand up to Internet bullies and stalkers?
Join my group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antiCHU
----------------------------------------------
"I am mad as hell and I will not take it anymore!"
---Network
Kent Wills
wrote:
>On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:08:19 -0500, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>
>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>
>>Maybe the Shadow knows?
>
>
>Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
>he intended.
Further proving he's incompetent? An odd motivation, but I
acknowledge it is possible.
>Popgun hasn't posted anymore since then and if he does I
>think he will watch him "mouth."
I've never seen a post from anyone with that nym.
>
>You all can take a lesson from this. If you win the suit you still
>have to pay your lawyer. Remember that there are real live people
>behind these keyboards and hiding behind anonymous German servers and
>remailers will not always keep Kevlar on your bottom.
I've been pointing out how Novins is incompetent for a long time.
I'm still here. Of course, what I post is based on what he's
presented, so he can't do a great deal to me.
--
Count your blessings by thinking of those whom you love.
Peter Hucker
You may have exceeded the RDA.
--
I'm 2623rd worldwide in BOINC distributed computing.
Join here: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/
I'm 78th in protein research systems alpha testing.
And 118th in extreme weather event research.
And 203rd in 2-phase fluid behavior in microgravity and microfluidics computer simulations.
Customer explaining flooded car to insurance claim investigator:
"It didn't look that deep at first glance - it only came half way up the ducks."
Aratzio
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Lady Veteran
<arm...@bigfoot.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:08:19 -0500, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>
>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>
>>Maybe the Shadow knows?
>
>
>Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
>he intended. Popgun hasn't posted anymore since then and if he does I
>think he will watch him "mouth."
>
>You all can take a lesson from this. If you win the suit you still
>have to pay your lawyer. Remember that there are real live people
>behind these keyboards and hiding behind anonymous German servers and
>remailers will not always keep Kevlar on your bottom.
>
>LV
>
Glad to see you are still one of the most irredeemably ignorant and
self centered entities to have posted to USENET.
The facts are much more dire for Novins now that his 60 days expired
and the case is moving to federal courts. The people he sued will most
likely be awarded their legal fees out of Novins pocket. That is
probably the best case scenario for Novins at this point. Worst case
is the countersuits will also cause the award of damages above the
legal costs and he is sanctioned by the courts and the bar.
But the best part here is you and the rest of the ignnorati will see
some gorgeous landscape of victory and will continue to entertain
those capable of rational thought. Nothing can in any way burst those
clue shields that you have developed that prevent any possible contact
with reality.
Here is some fact for you:
1. Novins failed to understand New Jersey law as he was using it, ergo
the Federal courts.
2. Novins failed to even respond to interrogatories from defense
counsel, which caused the New Jesrsey court to dismiss the case,
without prejudice. Givuing him 60 days to refile and answer or the
case would be dismissed with prejudice.
3. There is existing evidence that he knew the origin of the
defamatory email was not the people he was suing.
Truly epic failure on Novins part.
But you celebrate what you see as a victory for the morons of USENET.
�n�hw��f
thought with news:j28lh5th6nukkngde...@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:08:19 -0500, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>
>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>
>>Maybe the Shadow knows?
>
>
> Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished
> what he intended. Popgun hasn't posted anymore since then and if
> he does I think he will watch him "mouth."
>
> You all can take a lesson from this. If you win the suit you still
> have to pay your lawyer. Remember that there are real live people
> behind these keyboards and hiding behind anonymous German servers
> and remailers will not always keep Kevlar on your bottom.
>
> LV
HOWS YER PIGGIES!!?!?
HOWS YER LIL PIGGIES!?!?!
DO YE TWIST THEIR LITTLE TAILS AND MAKE EM SQUEEL!?
I bet you do...
I bet you do.
^_^
�n�hw��f
with news:op.u4ha1yj54buhsv@i7:
> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:53:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/4/2009 2:34 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:08:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the Shadow knows?
>>>
>>> What have you been drinking?
>>
>> Coffee. Why?
>
> You may have exceeded the RDA.
>
RULE OF THUMM: NO COFFY AFTER 3PM
Words to live by...
ah
> "Peter Hucker" <no...@spam.com> clouded the waters of pure thought
> with news:op.u4ha1yj54buhsv@i7:
>
>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:53:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/4/2009 2:34 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:08:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the Shadow knows?
>>>>
>>>> What have you been drinking?
>>>
>>> Coffee. Why?
>>
>> You may have exceeded the RDA.
>>
>
> RULE OF THUMM: NO COFFY AFTER 3PM
>
> Words to live by...
>
> ^_^
>
>
wuz
ah
> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:53:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/4/2009 2:34 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:08:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the Shadow knows?
>>>
>>> What have you been drinking?
>>
>> Coffee. Why?
>
> You may have exceeded the RDA.
Everything exceeds the RDA.
The FDA is just another welfare program masquerading as a Governmental Agency.
ah
> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:08:19 -0500, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>
>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>
>>Maybe the Shadow knows?
>
>
> Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
> he intended. Popgun hasn't posted anymore since then and if he does I
> think he will watch him "mouth."
ROLF!
>
> You all can take a lesson from this. If you win the suit you still
> have to pay your lawyer. Remember that there are real live people
> behind these keyboards and hiding behind anonymous German servers and
> remailers will not always keep Kevlar on your bottom.
LIES!
>
> LV
>
> "I rode a tank and held a general's rank
> When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."
>
> ---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
> --------------------------------------------
> "Some people are only alive because it is
> illegal to kill them."
>
> ---Anonymous
> ----------------------------------------------
> How does your idiocy measure up?
>
> My Blog http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com
> ---------------------------------------------
> Are you being harassed on Usenet and want to fight
> back instead of leaving the net? Are you willing to
> stand up to Internet bullies and stalkers?
> Join my group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antiCHU
> ----------------------------------------------
> "I am mad as hell and I will not take it anymore!"
>
> ---Network
"Your IPv6 just ran over my MAC!"
---LAN MAN
henri
wrote:
>Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
>he intended.
You mean he intended to make himself look like a failed lawyer, a
buffoon, and a frivolous litigant, then have his case thrown out?
"The Great One"
"ah" <splif...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4b1addc1$0$65845$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> On 12/5/2009 1:05 PM, Lady Veteran wrote:
> > On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:08:19 -0500, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
> >>>
> >>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
> >>
> >>Maybe the Shadow knows?
> >
> >
> > Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
> > he intended. Popgun hasn't posted anymore since then and if he does I
> > think he will watch him "mouth."
>
> ROLF!
>
> >
> > You all can take a lesson from this. If you win the suit you still
> > have to pay your lawyer. Remember that there are real live people
> > behind these keyboards and hiding behind anonymous German servers and
> > remailers will not always keep Kevlar on your bottom.
>
> LIES!
> Andrew
Shttup, Deco Slurper!!
--
John C.
�n�hw��f
news:4b1adc8f$0$77561$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com:
HOE U LIEK XFACE!?
I DRAW MYSELF!!!!!!!!!!!
^_^
ps, yorz is skary!
Aratzio
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net>
got double secret probation for writing:
>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:05:49 -0600, Lady Veteran
><arm...@bigfoot.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:08:19 -0500, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>>
>>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>>
>>>Maybe the Shadow knows?
>>
>>
>>Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
>>he intended. Popgun hasn't posted anymore since then and if he does I
>>think he will watch him "mouth."
>
>Yes he intended to make people spend money on legal bullshit. And he
>also accomplished to send his credibility down the shitter.
It is entirely possible that Novins will be on the hook for the legal
expenses for both sides.
Which will mean his accomplishments were a negative.
Aratzio
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Anyone
<""Zrqt�\"@Qi�QUm[�H:\"&z25u/g`MpEr)\"{ETq[opZ\"Vz.az?"> got double
secret probation for writing:
>Aratzio wrote on 05-Dec-09 11:13 ...
>Indeed.
>
>> But you celebrate what you see as a victory for the morons of USENET.
>
>Just catching-up on news...
>'Congrats', 'Rats and others. I'm waiting/hoping for your paragraph two.
I was never a defendant, I'm just the fuckhead.
Aratzio
>On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:11:14 -0800, Aratzio
><a6ah...@sneakemail.com>wrote:
>La vengeance est un plat qui se mange froid.
I hope that is Belgian or Swiss.
Peter Hucker
> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:59:48 -0000, "Peter Hucker" <no...@spam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:53:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/4/2009 2:34 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:08:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the Shadow knows?
>>>>
>>>> What have you been drinking?
>>>
>>> Coffee. Why?
>>
>> You may have exceeded the RDA.
>
> Is there such a thing? :)
There should be. I've seen the effects of too much.
--
I'm 2623rd worldwide in BOINC distributed computing.
Join here: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/
I'm 78th in protein research systems alpha testing.
And 118th in extreme weather event research.
And 203rd in 2-phase fluid behavior in microgravity and microfluidics computer simulations.
The following is a telephone exchange between a hotel guest and room-service, at a hotel in Asia, which was recorded and published in the Far East Economic Review:
Room Service: "Morrin. Roon sirbees."
Guest: "Sorry, I thought I dialed room-service."
Room Service: "Rye..Roon sirbees..morrin! Jewish to oddor sunteen??"
Guest: "Uh..yes..I'd like some bacon and eggs."
Room Service: "Ow July den?"
Guest: "What??"
Room Service: "Ow July den?...pryed, boyud, poochd?"
Guest: "Oh, the eggs! How do I like them? Sorry, scrambled please."
Room Service: "Ow July dee baykem? Crease?"
Guest: "Crisp will be fine."
Room Service: "Hokay. An Sahn toes?"
Guest: "What?"
Room Service: "An toes. July Sahn toes?"
Guest: "I don't think so."
Room Service: "No? Judo wan sahn toes??"
Guest: "I feel really bad about this, but I don't know what 'judo wan sahn toes' means."
Room Service: "Toes! toes!...Why jew don juan toes? Ow bow Anglish moppin we bodder?"
Guest: "English muffin!! I've got it! You were saying 'Toast.' Fine. Yes, an English muffin will be fine."
Room Service: "We bodder?"
Guest: "No...just put the bodder on the side.
Room Service: "Wad?"
Guest: "I mean butter...just put it on the side."
Room Service: "Copy?"
Guest: "Excuse me?"
Room Service: "Copy...tea...meel?"
Guest: "Yes. Coffee, please, and that's all."
Room Service: "One Minnie. Scramah egg, crease baykem, Anglish moppin we bodder on sigh and copy....rye??"
Guest: "Whatever you say."
Room Service: "Tenjewberrymuds."
Guest: "You're very welcome."
Lady Veteran
wrote:
>Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> clouded the waters of pure
>thought with news:j28lh5th6nukkngde...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:08:19 -0500, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>>
>>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>>
>>>Maybe the Shadow knows?
>>
>>
>> Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished
>> what he intended. Popgun hasn't posted anymore since then and if
>> he does I think he will watch him "mouth."
>>
>> You all can take a lesson from this. If you win the suit you still
>> have to pay your lawyer. Remember that there are real live people
>> behind these keyboards and hiding behind anonymous German servers
>> and remailers will not always keep Kevlar on your bottom.
>>
>> LV
>
>HOWS YER PIGGIES!!?!?
>HOWS YER LIL PIGGIES!?!?!
>DO YE TWIST THEIR LITTLE TAILS AND MAKE EM SQUEEL!?
>
>I bet you do...
>I bet you do.
>
>^_^
Jim Dutton has all the little piggies in his little sty. I never had
any except in his imagination.
Lady Veteran
wrote:
No, I think that was a side effect kept alive by the fools who like to
harass others in Usenet.
You mean that you and yours will not take extra care to hide really,
REALLY well before harassing someone on Usenet so you don't get
caught?
Honestly, do you think that harassment of one individual by another is
a frivolous matter?
You would not think so if you were on the receiving end of the
harassment.
Lady Veteran
wrote:
>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:05:49 -0600, Lady Veteran
><arm...@bigfoot.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:08:19 -0500, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>>
>>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>>
>>>Maybe the Shadow knows?
>>
>>
>>Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
>>he intended. Popgun hasn't posted anymore since then and if he does I
>>think he will watch him "mouth."
>
>Yes he intended to make people spend money on legal bullshit. And he
>also accomplished to send his credibility down the shitter.
According to whom-you and your friends? Why do you and your friends
carry so much authority to judge his destiny? Has it occurred to you
that he didn't think the joke was funny? I certainly don't.
Lady Veteran
<""Zrqt�\"@Qi�QUm[�H:\"&z25u/g`MpEr)\"{ETq[opZ\"Vz.az?"> wrote:
>Aratzio wrote on 05-Dec-09 11:13 ...
>> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:05:49 -0600, in the land of
>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Lady Veteran
>> <arm...@bigfoot.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:08:19 -0500, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>>> Maybe the Shadow knows?
>>>
>>> Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
>>> he intended. Popgun hasn't posted anymore since then and if he does I
>>> think he will watch him "mouth."
>>>
>>> You all can take a lesson from this. If you win the suit you still
>>> have to pay your lawyer. Remember that there are real live people
>>> behind these keyboards and hiding behind anonymous German servers and
>>> remailers will not always keep Kevlar on your bottom.
>>>
>>> LV
>>>
>>
>> Glad to see you are still one of the most irredeemably ignorant and
>> self centered entities to have posted to USENET.
According to you? So what?
>>
>> The facts are much more dire for Novins now that his 60 days expired
>> and the case is moving to federal courts. The people he sued will most
>> likely be awarded their legal fees out of Novins pocket. That is
>> probably the best case scenario for Novins at this point. Worst case
>> is the countersuits will also cause the award of damages above the
>> legal costs and he is sanctioned by the courts and the bar.
>>
>> But the best part here is you and the rest of the ignnorati will see
>> some gorgeous landscape of victory and will continue to entertain
>> those capable of rational thought. Nothing can in any way burst those
>> clue shields that you have developed that prevent any possible contact
>> with reality.
>>
>> Here is some fact for you:
>> 1. Novins failed to understand New Jersey law as he was using it, ergo
>> the Federal courts.
>> 2. Novins failed to even respond to interrogatories from defense
>> counsel, which caused the New Jesrsey court to dismiss the case,
>> without prejudice. Givuing him 60 days to refile and answer or the
>> case would be dismissed with prejudice.
>> 3. There is existing evidence that he knew the origin of the
>> defamatory email was not the people he was suing.
>>
>> Truly epic failure on Novins part.
>
>Indeed.
>
>> But you celebrate what you see as a victory for the morons of USENET.
>
>Just catching-up on news...
>'Congrats', 'Rats and others. I'm waiting/hoping for your paragraph two.
It would be more like the psychos and sociopaths of Usenet. This is an
ideal environment to get their jollies by causing pain to people they
don't even know. That is unacceptable.
By the way. I would like to see a URL of the case proceedings . I
seriously doubt that Mr. 1, 2 and 3 above is speaking with any kind of
authority.
henri
wrote:
>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:50:31 -0500, henri <he...@nowhere.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:05:49 -0600, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
>>>he intended.
>>
>>You mean he intended to make himself look like a failed lawyer, a
>>buffoon, and a frivolous litigant, then have his case thrown out?
>No, I think that was a side effect kept alive by the fools who like to
>harass others in Usenet.
>You mean that you and yours will not take extra care to hide really,
>REALLY well before harassing someone on Usenet so you don't get
>caught?
My identity is well known. I do not feel any need to hide from
pathetic buffoons incapable of harming anyone but themselves.
Lady Veteran
wrote:
>On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:31:28 -0600, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:50:31 -0500, henri <he...@nowhere.invalid>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:05:49 -0600, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
>>>>he intended.
>>>
>>>You mean he intended to make himself look like a failed lawyer, a
>>>buffoon, and a frivolous litigant, then have his case thrown out?
>
>>No, I think that was a side effect kept alive by the fools who like to
>>harass others in Usenet.
>
>>You mean that you and yours will not take extra care to hide really,
>>REALLY well before harassing someone on Usenet so you don't get
>>caught?
>
>My identity is well known. I do not feel any need to hide from
>pathetic buffoons incapable of harming anyone but themselves.
he...@nowhere.invalid
Yep-that is really credible, henri.
It is not the buffoons I worry about. It is the psychos and
sociopaths.
�n�hw��f
Yeh ROIGHT! I canna beleeve ye!
�n�hw��f
news:hfh4c7$gua$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:31:28 -0600, Lady Veteran
> <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>>You would not think so if you were on the receiving end of the
>>harassment.
>
> Poor Bobbi, still whining after all these years. Is your
> *business office* still located in that motel?
>
"its a very fine lobby with *two* fake palms...and not cheap ones
either...but the nice ones with silk leaves..."
Lady Veteran
wrote:
>On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:43:15 -0600, Lady Veteran
><arm...@bigfoot.com>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:48:59 -0500, Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:05:49 -0600, Lady Veteran
>>><arm...@bigfoot.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:08:19 -0500, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe the Shadow knows?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
>>>>he intended. Popgun hasn't posted anymore since then and if he does I
>>>>think he will watch him "mouth."
>>>
>>>Yes he intended to make people spend money on legal bullshit. And he
>>>also accomplished to send his credibility down the shitter.
>>
>>According to whom-you and your friends?
>
>According to me.
I don't think so. He may be down now, but he will rally.
>
>>Why do you and your friends carry so much authority to judge his destiny?
>
>A federal judge will handle his destiny.
>
The lawsuit should have been filed in Federal court because the
defendants were not all in the same state. Usenet is increasingly
being seen as a sewer who psychos and sociopaths proliferate. I think
it's days are numbered. It's days are short because of the abuse of
anonymous remailers and servers to harass others.
AUK is a case in point. There are no facts and no truth. There is only
innuendo and there are vultures in AUK who feed on it.
This joke has long lost it ability to be funny.
>>Has it occurred to you that he didn't think the joke was funny? I certainly don't.
>
>I couldn't care less what was thought of as funny. I'm stating facts,
>not trying to determine the mind set of a crazed person/persons.
Oh yeah? I haven't seen any facts yet.
I found what I was looking for without your help.
Gregory Hall
news:9v6oh559335i1l365...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:51:48 -0500, henri <he...@nowhere.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:31:28 -0600, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:50:31 -0500, henri <he...@nowhere.invalid>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:05:49 -0600, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Even if Novins did fail in his lawsuit, I think he accomplished what
>>>>>he intended.
>>>>
>>>>You mean he intended to make himself look like a failed lawyer, a
>>>>buffoon, and a frivolous litigant, then have his case thrown out?
>>
>>>No, I think that was a side effect kept alive by the fools who like to
>>>harass others in Usenet.
>>
>>>You mean that you and yours will not take extra care to hide really,
>>>REALLY well before harassing someone on Usenet so you don't get
>>>caught?
>>
>>My identity is well known. I do not feel any need to hide from
>>pathetic buffoons incapable of harming anyone but themselves.
>
> he...@nowhere.invalid
>
> Yep-that is really credible, henri.
>
> It is not the buffoons I worry about. It is the psychos and
> sociopaths.
>
> LV
Then you should also worry about 'henri.' I believe he fits the categories
you mentioned.
Here's his bio:
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/anti-religious-extremists/robert-w-clark/
--
Gregory Hall
Aratzio
henri <he...@nowhere.invalid> got double secret probation for writing:
All it takes is having your parents give you a traditional family
name. Even better is when it is one that is primarily old world and
more than a little unusual. Then the kooks spend all that time trying
to penetrate the nym.
Mad as a Box of Frogs
Well that was enlightening.
Please tell me...
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/anti-religious-extremists
who else among that miasma of wretches plays Usenet that I(we)
might be familiar with.
--
Master of Puppets Be proud of what's in your trousers
DENSA Life Achievement � Am I the only one with half a brain?
Gregory Hall
news:hfhcjf$u7q$1...@undertow.eternal-september.org...
Roger Gonnet, "Barbz" Graham, Gerald Armstrong, Tory Christman (Magoo),
Fredric Rice, Garry Scarff, Arnie Learma . . . But, you probably won't be
familiar with them unless you read alt.religion.scientology.
--
Gregory Hall
K. A. Cannon
wrote:
<snip>
>By the way. I would like to see a URL of the case proceedings . I
>seriously doubt that Mr. 1, 2 and 3 above is speaking with any kind of
>authority.
I can....he's correct.
--
K. A. Cannon
kevin.a.cannon at gmail.com.
COOSN-266-06-02374
Hammer of Thor, April 2005
PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER June 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle X 2
#9 People ruining UseNet lits.
#6 Top Assholes on the Net lits.
#5 Most hated Usenetizens of all time
#15 AUK psychos and felons lits
#5 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
http://signup.databasix.com
http://www.themonastery.org/dev/cert/ulc_certificate_view.swf?id=10010810040414
Cujo DeSockpuppet
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:48:43 -0600, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>By the way. I would like to see a URL of the case proceedings . I
>>seriously doubt that Mr. 1, 2 and 3 above is speaking with any kind of
>>authority.
>
> I can....he's correct.
Let Blobbi ramble on with her delusions. It's much more entertaining than
the Crap'n'Kneel/Greg sock.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"You are the childish moron if you think anyone is dumb enough to think
that you harass me for fun." - Ed displays his sense of humor to all.
Lady Veteran
wrote:
>On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:31:28 -0600, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
>wrote:
>
>>You would not think so if you were on the receiving end of the
>>harassment.
>
>Poor Bobbi, still whining after all these years. Is your *business
>office* still located in that motel?
Is your brain on loan to the cryogenic lab?
Yes, you too.
It figures a coward like you would be laughing it up. You are one of
the psychos/sociopaths I talk about ad nauseam.
Yes Freddy Kruger-YOU!
Lady Veteran
wrote:
>Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> clouded the waters of pure thought with
>news:hfh4c7$gua$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:31:28 -0600, Lady Veteran
>> <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>
>>>You would not think so if you were on the receiving end of the
>>>harassment.
>>
>> Poor Bobbi, still whining after all these years. Is your
>> *business office* still located in that motel?
>>
>"its a very fine lobby with *two* fake palms...and not cheap ones
>either...but the nice ones with silk leaves..."
Some wastes of space (like the idiot above) think it is a bad thing to
have an office in my home or my home in a motel. Some people would
KILL for maid service and not have to pay extra.
Some people really need to get a life.
Lady Veteran
wrote:
Fine. The problem is yours, not mine.
Lady Veteran
I rest my case yer-honor......
<LV happy dance>
"The Great One"
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>
> I was never a defendant,
> I'm just the fuckhead.
IAWTP !!
John C.
�n�hw��f
ITS REELY COLD TODAY
COULD YOU CUT A HUGE FART AND WARM UP THE PLANET A BIT?
TIA
�n�hw��f
thought with news:mlqoh5da1dq5snk5p...@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:06:31 -0600, "�n�hw��f"
> <snuh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> clouded the waters of pure thought
>>with news:hfh4c7$gua$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>>> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:31:28 -0600, Lady Veteran
>>> <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>You would not think so if you were on the receiving end of the
>>>>harassment.
>>>
>>> Poor Bobbi, still whining after all these years. Is your
>>> *business office* still located in that motel?
>>>
>>"its a very fine lobby with *two* fake palms...and not cheap ones
>>either...but the nice ones with silk leaves..."
>
> Some wastes of space (like the idiot above) think it is a bad
> thing to have an office in my home or my home in a motel. Some
> people would KILL for maid service and not have to pay extra.
>
> Some people really need to get a life.
>
> LV
>
SOME PEOPLE!
I HATE SOME PEOPLE!
ah
> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:20:56 -0500, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 12/5/2009 1:59 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:53:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/4/2009 2:34 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:08:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe the Shadow knows?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Coffee. Why?
>>>
>>> You may have exceeded the RDA.
>>
>>Everything exceeds the RDA.
>>
>>The FDA is just another welfare program masquerading as a Governmental Agency.
>
> How does the FDA factor into welfare? I'm very curious.
Providing compensation to those who neither need nor require it.
--
a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
ah
> ah <splif...@gmail.com> clouded the waters of pure thought with
> news:4b1adc8f$0$77561$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com:
>
>> On 12/5/2009 4:00 PM, �n�hw��f wrote:
>>> "Peter Hucker" <no...@spam.com> clouded the waters of pure thought
>>> with news:op.u4ha1yj54buhsv@i7:
>>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:53:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/4/2009 2:34 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:08:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/3/2009 1:55 PM, Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:52:05 -0000, ah
> <splif...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a "http://bartsblackboard.com/" h
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why is he in a different position in the 4th from last?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe the Shadow knows?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What have you been drinking?
>>>>>
>>>>> Coffee. Why?
>>>>
>>>> You may have exceeded the RDA.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Words to live by...
>>>
>>> ^_^
>>>
>>>
>>
>> wuz
>
> HOE U LIEK XFACE!?
> I DRAW MYSELF!!!!!!!!!!!
HE MAN EYE KANT SEE EATS!
>
> ^_^
>
> ps, yorz is skary!
WOA!