Finding people in the law with my casing technique is often mistaken with a case-based reasoning, a related AI paradigm. My pop-a-911 civilian surveillance casing technique handing over routine patrol for potential disturbances tends to be misapplied as a CBR technology but actually casing with decision trees can be derived for Bayes or C4.5 decision trees with census data. My original analysis as a forensic artificial intelligence technician was the legalities of the traveling pariah problem, trick or treating as a Jehovah’s Witness in a strange place armed with census and marketing lists. This is the common information strategy of businesses and corporations. While
fedstats.gov maintains listing of census data in the US , multiple domicile in an inferential demographic casing or jurisdictional common law eerie doctrine analysis may be useless globally where biological, medical, nationality, religion may be more useful
https://cis.temple.edu/~giorgio/cis587/readings/id3-c45.html