Re: Any News from the Cannon Smackdown Trial?
Aratzio
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
writing:
>Have Cannon and the others been served their well-deserved dose of civil
>justice yet?
I wonder how important a ruling that references the following is:
http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/rules/r4-23.htm
4:23-5. Failure to Make Discovery
(a) Dismissal.
(1) Without Prejudice...
If the plaintiff is a complete fuck-up then the endgame can start with
the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(1). Which will lead to the merry
conclusion 60 days later with the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(2).
Since Novins is afraid of me, one of you tools wanna ask Novins about
4:23-5(A)(1) and what it means to him?
ah
Eh?
You know . . . eh?
Aratzio
Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
>On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:17:16 -0400, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
>writing:
>
>>Have Cannon and the others been served their well-deserved dose of civil
>>justice yet?
>
>I wonder how important a ruling that references the following is:
>
>http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/rules/r4-23.htm
>4:23-5. Failure to Make Discovery
> (a) Dismissal.
> (1) Without Prejudice...
>
>If the plaintiff is a complete fuck-up then the endgame can start with
>the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(1). Which will lead to the merry
>conclusion 60 days later with the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(2).
>
>Since Novins is afraid of me, one of you tools wanna ask Novins about
>4:23-5(A)(1) and what it means to him?
What a surprise, crickets from the Novins Fan Club.
I'll expect Novins to be along any day crowing how a ruling like that
is actually a win for him because he has fewer defendants.
Aratzio
<splif...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
Check your gmail.
Russell Tavek
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:17:16 -0400, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> writing:
>
> >Have Cannon and the others been served their well-deserved dose of civil
> >justice yet?
>
> I wonder how important a ruling that references the following is:
>
> http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/rules/r4-23.htm
> 4:23-5. Failure to Make Discovery
> (a) Dismissal.
> (1) Without Prejudice...
>
> If the plaintiff is a complete fuck-up then the endgame can start with
> the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(1). Which will lead to the merry
> conclusion 60 days later with the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(2).
>
> Since Novins is afraid of me, one of you tools wanna ask Novins about
> 4:23-5(A)(1) and what it means to him?
So exactly how many thousands of dollars in legal fees will the
stAUKers wind up paying for their frea speech triumph?
(Note to Flash: this is where you come in and out me as Greg Hall... )
"The Great One"
"Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:09ca950a-f974-447a...@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
****************************************
LOLOL !!
Glad you're back.....I enjoy reading every one of your posts !!
--
John C.
****************************************
"The Great One"
"bookman" <The_po...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:0cf1f659-c66c-4b4c...@w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 29, 5:43 pm, miguel <mun...@mungge.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:17:16 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
>
> <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
> >Have Cannon and the others been served their well-deserved dose of civil
> >justice yet?
>
> Removing Himself From Usenet Altogether.
>
> Right, Bookman?
If one sits on the bank of the river long enough, he will eventually
see the bodies of his enemies floating downstream, even if they were
acquitted.
**********************************
You don't sound like yourself since your death, Bookie.....you are supposed to sound all "Rabid & Frothy" like your AUK buddy Roz Ratzio who is so Afraid of Mr. Novins that he has had to start taking Prozac and increase his "Ko0kDancing" activities on AUK lately !!
Hope you get to feeling better (fer a dead guy).
--
John C.
ah
Aratzio
alt.free.newsservers, ah <splif...@gmail.com> got double secret
probation for writing:
60 days and it becomes "with prejudice" and Novins will be on the hook
for the costs. He can refile before 60 days but that will cost him
money and the court will not look upon him with anything but disdain
at that point. He had all this time and couldn't answer simple
interogatories. If I were him I would sue his lawyer.
Then come the counter suits.
miguel
wrote:
What I've been told is that such dismissals are fairly common in NJ
and reinstatement of the case is also routine. That's in general.
Novins' case might depart from the norm inasmuch as truthful answers
to Cannon's and Osterwald's interrogatories would reveal the frivolity
of Novins' lawsuit. He's best off not responding to them.
pandora
Can I have one too sir?
Aratzio
miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for writing:
Yep, once he answers his case is toast. Especially given his admission
he knew that Kevin did not send the message and still filed.
Aratzio
alt.free.newsservers, pandora <pan...@peak.org> got double secret
probation for writing:
(sent)
You will note that gweggie is avoiding his own thread now. Poor lil
gweggie was all joy and happiness and then the evul denizens of auk
rain upon another of his pity parades.
What's the matter gweggie? Rulings got your tongue?
Gregory Hall
news:3fefc5d27iqig73s2...@4ax.com...
Sorry for the lack of a rapid response, it's not that I'm not paying
attention but . . .
I am just speechless trying to glean the depths of your usual ignorance,
"Roz." I have said over and over again that the anonymously remailed posting
that has been attributed to Cannon cannot ever be proved to have been
Cannon's work. I have also stated over and over again that it simply does
not matter who the original author was. I have stated as many or more times
it is repeating this libelous post either in snippets or in its entirety or
linking to it by the stAUKers that constitutes libel by them.
Wake up and get a clue, you Rube. If you step in shit your foot is going to
smell like shit even if you don't have a clue who was responsible for the
shit in the first place.
--
Gregory Hall
"The Great One"
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message news:3653sj....@news.alt.net...
Cha-Ching....BULL'S-EYE !!
--
John C.
Gregory Hall
news:oomdnSMwydPyXFrX...@centurytel.net...
=========================================
[REPLY]
The stAUKers really ARE dumb! It's gonna be a cake walk for Mr. Atlas.
--
Gregory Hall
"The Great One"
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message news:3655hl....@news.alt.net...
Roz would like to be on "The Hot Seat" and warm-up her snatch !!
--
John C.
Aratzio
Wonder how long it will take him to get the case reinstated now that
it has been dismissed?
Aratzio
BWAHAAAAAHAAAAAAHAAAAA
poor gweggie, couldb't stand it any longer.
>
>I am just speechless trying to glean the depths of your usual ignorance,
>"Roz." I have said over and over again that the anonymously remailed posting
>that has been attributed to Cannon cannot ever be proved to have been
>Cannon's work. I have also stated over and over again that it simply does
>not matter who the original author was. I have stated as many or more times
>it is repeating this libelous post either in snippets or in its entirety or
>linking to it by the stAUKers that constitutes libel by them.
Too bad Novins case has fallen apart because of the incompetence of
Novins' lawyer. Yep, I'd say he has a strong malpractice case against
his lawyer.
>
>Wake up and get a clue, you Rube. If you step in shit your foot is going to
>smell like shit even if you don't have a clue who was responsible for the
>shit in the first place.
Poor little delusional gweggie. Can't even come up with his own
beliefs and just plays his best PeeWee Herman.
You did hear the judge dismissed the case, didn't you? Novins didn't
tell you? Fuck, Novins didn't even fight the dismissal. The ruling to
dismiss was "unopposed". Damn, that makes you look like a complete
retard.
You may want to use a lemon caper sauce on all that crow you have to
eat.
Simple Greed
Did the judge really make Chucky Novins admit that he had no
penis?
Gregory Hall
I'd guess you're as pathetic a chess player as you are a predictor of court
action.
--
Gregory Hall
Aratzio
Are you claiming that Judge Nemeth of the Superior Court of New Jersey
Law Division, Ocean County did not dismiss the case against Cannon &
Osterwald on 9-25-09 under rule 4:23-5(a)?
If you are wondering what is the "caw caw" sound you are hearing,
fresh crow.
Gregory Hall
I just read the dismissal order and in it the term "without prejudice" was
used. I suggest you look up this legal term.
Also, there is no indication that Novins is prohibited from re-filing. It
seems to me it was you Rubes who accused him of wishing to drag things out
as long as possible. Maybe he is just giving your your prediction right back
in your pimply faces?
Also, if there is no claim there can, by definition, be no counterclaim.
Something that is counter must counter something that exists. If no claim
exists the counterclaims are invalid. Think about it, Rube. Novins is
probably going to make you Rubes start all over again from scratch. Please
enjoy spending all that money. <lol>
--
Gregory Hall
--
Gregory Hall
Aratzio
Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> got double secret probation for writing:
>On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:54:50 -0700, Aratzio
><a6ah...@sneakemail.com>wrote:
>This is so not surprising since I being just one of many predicted
>this dismissal.
Grade school children would have sufficient education to know he never
had a case. It is dismissed "without prejudice" so he can still refile
after paying a penalty. However, if he does not refile within 60 days
it becomes "with prejudice" and then the real fun begins. Given that
Novins is a lawyer representing himself, the case is an obvious sham
and his past and present commentary with regard to the case the
sanctions will be severe.
The hopes of the kooks that the cost of the case will be born by the
defendants will go up in smoke with the case.
Gregory Hall
<snip>
>
> The hopes of the kooks that the cost of the case will be born by the
> defendants will go up in smoke with the case.
>
PKB, Roz. You and your fellow stAUKers are the 'kooks.' You think you're
out of pocket to date? Just wait and see what the future has in store for
you. <roflmao>
--
Gregory Hall
Richard Moet
>I just
want to spew!
>
>--
>Gregory Hall
Aratzio
<Gweggie proving once more his illiteracy is king>
>I just read the dismissal order and in it the term "without prejudice" was
>used. I suggest you look up this legal term.
So you were too stupid or too afraid to read what was originally
written:
:http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/rules/r4-23.htm
: 4:23-5. Failure to Make Discovery
: (a) Dismissal.
: (1) Without Prejudice...
:
: If the plaintiff is a complete fuck-up then the endgame can start
: with the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(1). Which will lead to the merry
: conclusion 60 days later with the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(2).
:
See, you idiot, I even reference that it is without prejudice and then
state the conclusion is in 60 days with prejudice.
>Also, there is no indication that Novins is prohibited from re-filing. It
>seems to me it was you Rubes who accused him of wishing to drag things out
>as long as possible. Maybe he is just giving your your prediction right back
>in your pimply faces?
Poor gwegggie, you didn't read the thread. You really should have, you
wouldn't look so incredibly defensive.
Fact: The case against Kevin & Carl is dismissed.
Fact: He has 60 days to refile AND answer all discovery.
Fact: Novins cannot answer discovery because his complaint is based
upon lies and he will refute his own complaint.
>
>Also, if there is no claim there can, by definition, be no counterclaim.
You sure, would you like to link to the NJ rule that supports your
idiocy?
The word you were actually looking for is "counter suit" which is not
the ssme as countercalim.
>Something that is counter must counter something that exists. If no claim
>exists the counterclaims are invalid. Think about it, Rube. Novins is
>probably going to make you Rubes start all over again from scratch. Please
>enjoy spending all that money. <lol>
Poor, gweggie, clay feet on his hero and that is all he has left,
rotten, crumbly straws he can't even grasp.
Oh, btw the complaint does not go away if there are counterclaims
attached. Bummer for novins. I'll bet he cannot even drop the
complaint once there is a counterclaim.
Novins is fucked.
Aratzio
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
writing:
>"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>news:aekhc5hqh6vlc020n...@4ax.com...
<Gweggie snips the part about "with prejudice" he claims I didn't
understand>
><snip>
>>
>> The hopes of the kooks that the cost of the case will be born by the
>> defendants will go up in smoke with the case.
>>
>
>PKB, Roz. You and your fellow stAUKers are the 'kooks.' You think you're
>out of pocket to date? Just wait and see what the future has in store for
>you. <roflmao>
If you stomp your feet a little harder the USGS might be able to pick
up your tantrum on the seismographs.
Novins "case" is swirling round and round.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>>>
>>>>I'd guess you're as pathetic a chess player as you are a predictor of
>>>>court
>>>>action.
>>>
>>> Are you claiming that Judge Nemeth of the Superior Court of New Jersey
>>> Law Division, Ocean County did not dismiss the case against Cannon &
>>> Osterwald on 9-25-09 under rule 4:23-5(a)?
>>>
>>> If you are wondering what is the "caw caw" sound you are hearing,
>>> fresh crow.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
><Gweggie proving once more his illiteracy is king>
>>I just read the dismissal order and in it the term "without prejudice" was
>>used. I suggest you look up this legal term.
>
>So you were too stupid or too afraid to read what was originally
>written:
>:http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/rules/r4-23.htm
>: 4:23-5. Failure to Make Discovery
>: (a) Dismissal.
>: (1) Without Prejudice...
>:
>: If the plaintiff is a complete fuck-up then the endgame can start
>: with the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(1). Which will lead to the merry
>: conclusion 60 days later with the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(2).
>:
>
>See, you idiot, I even reference that it is without prejudice and then
>state the conclusion is in 60 days with prejudice.
Such is applicable law.
>
>>Also, there is no indication that Novins is prohibited from re-filing. It
>>seems to me it was you Rubes who accused him of wishing to drag things out
>>as long as possible. Maybe he is just giving your your prediction right back
>>in your pimply faces?
>
>Poor gwegggie, you didn't read the thread. You really should have, you
>wouldn't look so incredibly defensive.
>
>Fact: The case against Kevin & Carl is dismissed.
>Fact: He has 60 days to refile AND answer all discovery.
>Fact: Novins cannot answer discovery because his complaint is based
>upon lies and he will refute his own complaint.
>
Novins would end up proving his own case false.
While I am of the opinion Novins is an incompetent attorney,
based on his posts, I would hope even he would see the folly in such
an action.
>>
>>Also, if there is no claim there can, by definition, be no counterclaim.
>
>You sure, would you like to link to the NJ rule that supports your
>idiocy?
>The word you were actually looking for is "counter suit" which is not
>the ssme as countercalim.
In the most technically meaning, Greg is correct. To have a
counterclaim, there must be an initial claim.
As you point out, that's not what he likely meant.
>
>>Something that is counter must counter something that exists. If no claim
>>exists the counterclaims are invalid. Think about it, Rube. Novins is
>>probably going to make you Rubes start all over again from scratch. Please
>>enjoy spending all that money. <lol>
>
>Poor, gweggie, clay feet on his hero and that is all he has left,
>rotten, crumbly straws he can't even grasp.
>
>Oh, btw the complaint does not go away if there are counterclaims
>attached. Bummer for novins. I'll bet he cannot even drop the
>complaint once there is a counterclaim.
>
That would surprise me. If he filed the initial complaint, he
should be permitted to drop it.
The counterclaim may continue to exist, though it would no longer
be a *counter*claim.
I do need to point out I'm not a lawyer, so what I think and the
law may well be at odds.
>Novins is fucked.
Pretty much. Based on what I've read from him, this is a normal
state for Novins.
pandora
Thanx.
> You will note that gweggie is avoiding his own thread now. Poor lil
> gweggie was all joy and happiness and then the evul denizens of auk
> rain upon another of his pity parades.
I know. It's rather pathetic.
> What's the matter gweggie? Rulings got your tongue?
So it would seem. Guess his idol has feet of clay, eh?
Gregory Hall
news:jf2dnawE7rjDuFTX...@scnresearch.com...
Guess your NSP is a piece of crap if you can't see my responses. Try
Altopia.
--
Gregory Hall
pandora
> On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:54:50 -0700, Aratzio
> <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>wrote:
>
> This is so not surprising since I being just one of many predicted
> this dismissal.
And I, for one, couldn't be happier. It was well deserved.
pandora
Are you denying that the case was dismissed?
pandora
And it couldn't happen to a more deserving individual.
pandora
MY NSP is just fine, thanks all the same. I don't read everything you write
as it is just crap.
stevie
>this dismissal.
--
- stevie
what if everything around you
isn't quite as it seems?
if you look at your reflection
is it all you want it to be?
what if you could look right through the cracks
would you find yourself
find yourself afraid to see?
-trent reznor
http://members.iinet.net.au/~vannevar/ascii3.html
henri
wrote:
>>You may want to use a lemon caper sauce on all that crow you have to
>>eat.
>This is so not surprising since I being just one of many predicted
>this dismissal.
I was thinking it would be dismissed on its (lack of) merits. I
suppose I might end up right on that if he corrects his procedural
failure and gets the case reinstated long enough for it to be thrown
out for being patently frivolous. Like someone knocked down by Mike
Tyson, though, he might be wiser just not to get up.
Gregory Hall
Means nothing. It's part of the overall strategy. That's why I mentioned
chess.
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
Well, then try shutting your pie hole until you can make some semblance of
sense, you twit.
Rulings got your tongue, Gweggie? -- Rat'z Ass
So it would seem . . . -- Pandora
Only an idiot would agree that the cat got my tongue on the one hand and
then, on the other hand, admit you don't read what I write.
Typical female, illogical MORON.
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
news:369mnj....@news.alt.net...
> On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:25:53 -0400, henri
> <he...@nowhere.invalid>wrote:
> he'll be proving himself wrong. I don't think he's that stupid.
What you 'think' doesn't matter. You know nothing. Your guesses are
worthless.
You gloaters need to shut your yaps and just wait and see what the next move
will be. There will be several more moves before you Rubes are checkmated.
The game is definitely not going your way. You're just too dumb to see it so
soon.
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:03:21 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
> <greg...@home.fake>wrote:
And how many boxes of Twinkies did you have to eat to grow that fat ass
back?
--
Gregory Hall
"The Great One"
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message news:369ned....@news.alt.net...
2,397 boxes of Twinkies and 432 cases of Dr. Pecker......
--
John C.
"The Great One"
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message news:369nca....@news.alt.net...
I agree with that last sentence !!
--
John C.
pandora
I see, so what you're saying is that he *intended* his case be dismissed.
Yeah, that's terrific strategy.
pandora
I wrote that I don't read *everything* you write, not that I don't read what
you write. It's obvious that your reading comprehension is nil.
> Typical female, illogical MORON.
Yeah, you're a moron alright.
Gregory Hall
Doh! According to the rules Mr. Novins Esq. has 60 days to file again. Time
is on his side. That alone gives him the upper hand. (Remember how the
stAUKer Rubes criticized him for some perceived oversights in his original
filing??) His is the move, the stAUKers are relegated to the counter move
and it looks to like they are not very adept at it. Until they take a Novins
pawn or two they remain behind in the game. As far as I can tell the
stAUKers have not even put themselves into position to institute a stalemate
yet. And a stalemate is the best they can hope to force, IMO.
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
You're one of those "liberated," feminist, Satan inspired, waste of space
women, aren't you, Pandora?
You need to have a better grounding in reality before you try to assume a
place in society where you do not belong. Become educated, read my latest
essay on women like yourself.
http://outingextremistanti-scientologists.blogspot.com/
--
Gregory Hall
§ñühwø£f
pile of:
> "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
> news:07OdnfgWxc0I2VfX...@scnresearch.com...
>>
>> Yeah, you're a moron alright.
>>
>>
> You're one of those "liberated," feminist, Satan inspired, waste of space
> women, aren't you, Pandora?
>
Feeling threatened again,k00ky?
> You need to have a better grounding in reality
Yet another 10k irony meters explode...
>before you try to assume
> a place in society where you do not belong. Become educated,
She did. Realised you're a fucking moron, and called it.
> read my
> latest essay
No, go stand in front of a train.
^_^
--
http://www.care2.com/click-to-donate/wolves/
http://ltsaloon.org
http://www.ramusa.org/
http://www.bartcop.com/list-the-facts.htm
http://www.pavlovianobeisance.com/
pandora
And your opinion is worth diddlysquat.
pandora
Indeed I am.
> Satan inspired, waste of space
> women, aren't you, Pandora?
My co-workers, my family and friends don't think I'm a waste of space. And
since I don't believe in your gods, I'm not concerned.
> You need to have a better grounding in reality before you try to assume a
> place in society where you do not belong.
I would bet that my reality is far better than your *belief* system,
inspired as it is by mythical beings.
> Become educated, read my latest
> essay on women like yourself.
I have no desire, whatsoever, to read what you believe of women like me.
> http://outingextremistanti-scientologists.blogspot.com/
>
You're one of *those* are you? Sick bastard.
pandora
> On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:46:01 -0400, Gregory Hall pinched out a steaming
> pile of:
>
>> "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
>> news:07OdnfgWxc0I2VfX...@scnresearch.com...
>>>
>>> Yeah, you're a moron alright.
>>>
>>>
>> You're one of those "liberated," feminist, Satan inspired, waste of space
>> women, aren't you, Pandora?
>>
> Feeling threatened again,k00ky?
>
>> You need to have a better grounding in reality
>
> Yet another 10k irony meters explode...
>
>>before you try to assume
>> a place in society where you do not belong. Become educated,
>
> She did. Realised you're a fucking moron, and called it.
>
>> read my
>> latest essay
>
> No, go stand in front of a train.
Heh.
> ^_^
>
>
_...@jeff_relf.seattle.invalid
Speaking of chess... a pawn is a pawn is a red queen. [ Note, LeeLoo has red dreads (vermillion, actually) ]
Gregory Hall
Jumping to false conclusions based upon seeing one word you take offense
with will ensure your remaining quite ignorant in perpetuity.
--
Gregory Hall
pandora
I take no offense as you are simply so far out that you and anything you say
is irrelevant to me or my life. However, you *are* fun to poke at now and
then.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> Gregory Hall wrote:
<snipped>
> And your opinion is worth diddlysquat.
Like nearly of the opinions heretofore expressed in this thread, including
yours.
What a bunch of maroons.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
The right to be heard does not automatically include
the right to be taken seriously. Hubert H. Humphrey
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:51:53 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> <rhonda...@earthling.net>wrote:
>
>> In news:0sidnY0jL_MA9VfX...@scnresearch.com,
>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>> Gregory Hall wrote:
>>
>> <snipped>
>>
>>> And your opinion is worth diddlysquat.
>>
>> Like nearly of the opinions heretofore expressed in this thread,
>> including yours.
>>
>> What a bunch of maroons.
>
Says the guy whose post count in this thread is currently seven to the woman
whose post count in this thread will be exactly two as soon as she sends
this post.
"The Great One"
"Meat Plow" <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:36c68k....@news.alt.net...
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:03:04 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
> <greg...@home.fake>wrote:
>
Then why do you "tail-gate" Roz Ratzio so close that if she stops your fat head will go up her twat ??
> And it's not what I think.
You....Think....TOO FUNNY !!!!
--
John C.
"The Great One"
"Meat Plow" <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:36c6bc....@news.alt.net...
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:04:11 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
Fat lames have worked real well, so far !!
> You don't know me or my stature...
Right, Fatty !!
..... nor do those who you parrot.
We know who you parrot, Fat-Boi........Roz Ratzio !!
--
John C.
Cujo DeSockpuppet
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:43:34 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> <rhonda...@earthling.net>wrote:
>
>>In news:36c6i4....@news.alt.net,
>>Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:51:53 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
>>> <rhonda...@earthling.net>wrote:
>>>
>>>> In news:0sidnY0jL_MA9VfX...@scnresearch.com,
>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>>>> Gregory Hall wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snipped>
>>>>
>>>>> And your opinion is worth diddlysquat.
>>>>
>>>> Like nearly of the opinions heretofore expressed in this thread,
>>>> including yours.
>>>>
>>>> What a bunch of maroons.
>>>
>>> Yet you're compelled to reply.
>>
>>Says the guy whose post count in this thread is currently seven to the
>>woman whose post count in this thread will be exactly two as soon as
>>she sends this post.
>
> Forget the count idiot
We're flaming royalty? I can't wait for Baron Moron, the Earl of Inanity
and the Duke of Incoherence to join the thread! I'm sure Sir Richard the
St00pid will be along too.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"And again, anyone who believes they have THE answers, is suffering from
delusions of granduer, a liar, a fool, and lacking in mature
perspectives." - Edmo in self-diagnosis mode.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:43:34 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> <rhonda...@earthling.net>wrote:
>
>> In news:36c6i4....@news.alt.net,
>> Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:51:53 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
>>> <rhonda...@earthling.net>wrote:
>>>
>>>> In news:0sidnY0jL_MA9VfX...@scnresearch.com,
>>>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>>>> Gregory Hall wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snipped>
>>>>
>>>>> And your opinion is worth diddlysquat.
>>>>
>>>> Like nearly of the opinions heretofore expressed in this thread,
>>>> including yours.
>>>>
>>>> What a bunch of maroons.
>>>
>>> Yet you're compelled to reply.
>>
>> Says the guy whose post count in this thread is currently seven to
>> the woman whose post count in this thread will be exactly two as
>> soon as she sends this post.
>
> discerned that little factoid you wouldn't have rushed in with your
> usual dogmatic bullshit.
Yeah, except that all of you are engaging in snarking that may impact
adversely on friends of yours. This is very similar to "Where's my
kooksoot?" and that didn't work out too well either. Ask yourself what a
certain type of personality will do when backed into a corner and
humiliated, and then be guided accordingly.
ah
ah
> Speaking of chess... a pawn is a pawn is a red queen.
> [ Note, LeeLoo has red dreads (vermillion, actually) ]
Medical marijuana, eh?
--
ah
ah
> In news:0sidnY0jL_MA9VfX...@scnresearch.com,
> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>> Gregory Hall wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
>> And your opinion is worth diddlysquat.
>
> Like nearly of the opinions heretofore expressed in this thread, including
> yours.
>
> What a bunch of maroons.
>
Fight!
--
ah
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>> In news:0sidnY0jL_MA9VfX...@scnresearch.com,
>> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>> Gregory Hall wrote:
>>
>> <snipped>
>>
>>> And your opinion is worth diddlysquat.
>>
>> Like nearly of the opinions heretofore expressed in this thread,
>> including yours.
>>
>> What a bunch of maroons.
>
> Fight!
Right!
"The Great One"
"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote in message news:7j2epcF...@mid.individual.net...
> In news:4acbf6ff$0$65829$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com,
> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
> >> In news:0sidnY0jL_MA9VfX...@scnresearch.com,
> >> pandora <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
> >>> Gregory Hall wrote:
> >>
> >> <snipped>
> >>
> >>> And your opinion is worth diddlysquat.
> >>
> >> Like nearly of the opinions heretofore expressed in this thread,
> >> including yours.
> >>
> >> What a bunch of maroons.
> >
> > Fight!
>
> Right!
>
ah
>> write
>> as it is just crap.
>>
>
>
> Well, then try shutting your pie hole until you can make some semblance of
> sense, you twit.
>
> Rulings got your tongue, Gweggie? -- Rat'z Ass
>
> So it would seem . . . -- Pandora
>
> Only an idiot would agree that the cat got my tongue on the one hand and
> then, on the other hand, admit you don't read what I write.
>
>
Ooooh, Bitch!
--
ah
Aratzio
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
writing:
>
>Means nothing. It's part of the overall strategy. That's why I mentioned
>chess.
"Hold my beer"
Aratzio
pandora <pan...@peak.org> got double secret probation for writing:
>Gregory Hall wrote:
>
>> "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
>> news:C-qdnXB9Lr4qrFTX...@scnresearch.com...
>>> Gregory Hall wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:q2lfc5hk5st636rp7...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:05:53 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
>>>>> "Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
>>>>> writing:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:3fefc5d27iqig73s2...@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:07:39 -0700, in the land of
>>>>>>> alt.free.newsservers, pandora <pan...@peak.org> got double secret
>>>>>>> probation for writing:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:32:48 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah
>>>>>>>>> <splif...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:17:16 -0400, in the land of
>>>>>>>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks, "Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double
>>>>>>>>>>> secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Have Cannon and the others been served their well-deserved dose
>>>>>>>>>>>>of civil
>>>>>>>>>>>>justice yet?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder how important a ruling that references the following is:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/rules/r4-23.htm
>>>>>>>>>>> 4:23-5. Failure to Make Discovery
>>>>>>>>>>> (a) Dismissal.
>>>>>>>>>>> (1) Without Prejudice...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If the plaintiff is a complete fuck-up then the endgame can start
>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>> the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(1). Which will lead to the merry
>>>>>>>>>>> conclusion 60 days later with the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(2).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Since Novins is afraid of me, one of you tools wanna ask Novins
>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>> 4:23-5(A)(1) and what it means to him?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Eh?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>You know . . . eh?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Check your gmail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Can I have one too sir?
>>>>>>> (sent)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You will note that gweggie is avoiding his own thread now. Poor lil
>>>>>>> gweggie was all joy and happiness and then the evul denizens of auk
>>>>>>> rain upon another of his pity parades.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's the matter gweggie? Rulings got your tongue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> You may want to use a lemon caper sauce on all that crow you have to
>>>>> eat.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd guess you're as pathetic a chess player as you are a predictor of
>>>> court action.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you denying that the case was dismissed?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Means nothing. It's part of the overall strategy. That's why I mentioned
>> chess.
>>
>I see, so what you're saying is that he *intended* his case be dismissed.
>Yeah, that's terrific strategy.
He also intends to refile so he can lose the case, have a financial
and mental meltdown and blame everyone but himself for his problems.
Aratzio
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
writing:
>According to the rules Mr. Novins Esq. has 60 days to file again.
BWAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA
The last word in legal dimwittery, have your case tossed.
pandora
It couldn't happen to a more deserving individual.
pandora
Shhhhh. It's all part of the master plan.
The Swindle
> Doh! According to the rules Mr. Novins Esq. has 60 days to file again. Time
> is on his side. That alone gives him the upper hand. (Remember how the
> stAUKer Rubes criticized him for some perceived oversights in his original
> filing??) His is the move, the stAUKers are relegated to the counter move
> and it looks to like they are not very adept at it. Until they take a Novins
> pawn or two they remain behind in the game. As far as I can tell the
> stAUKers have not even put themselves into position to institute a stalemate
> yet. And a stalemate is the best they can hope to force, IMO.
>
> --
> Gregory Hall
The game is over. The AUK / Novins escapade was just one big
troll job you fuckwit.
Linda
> On Oct 1, 1:45 am, Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
> So exactly how many thousands of dollars in legal fees will the
> stAUKers wind up paying for their frea speech triumph?
I believe Novins moved the matter to the federal district court
because one or more of the unnamed parties to the suit are entities
whom citizens can only file civil conspiracy suits against in a
federal court.
Linda
> "Aratzio" <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3fefc5d27iqig73s2...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:07:39 -0700, in the land of
> > probation for writing:
>
> >>Aratzio wrote:
>
> >>> On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:32:48 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah
> >>> <splifing...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>
> >>>>Aratzio wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:17:16 -0400, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>>> "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> got double secret probation for
> >>>>> writing:
>
> >>>>>>Have Cannon and the others been served their well-deserved dose of
> >>>>>>civil
> >>>>>>justice yet?
>
> >>>>> I wonder how important a ruling that references the following is:
>
> >>>>>http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/rules/r4-23.htm
> >>>>> 4:23-5. Failure to Make Discovery
> >>>>> (a) Dismissal.
> >>>>> (1) Without Prejudice...
>
> >>>>> If the plaintiff is a complete fuck-up then the endgame can start with
> >>>>> the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(1). Which will lead to the merry
> >>>>> conclusion 60 days later with the invocation of 4:23.5(A)(2).
>
> >>>>> Since Novins is afraid of me, one of you tools wanna ask Novins about
> >>>>> 4:23-5(A)(1) and what it means to him?
>
> >>>>Eh?
>
> >>>>You know . . . eh?
>
> >>> Check your gmail.
>
> >>Can I have one too sir?
> > (sent)
>
> > You will note that gweggie is avoiding his own thread now. Poor lil
> > gweggie was all joy and happiness and then the evul denizens of auk
> > rain upon another of his pity parades.
>
> > What's the matter gweggie? Rulings got your tongue?
>
> Sorry for the lack of a rapid response, it's not that I'm not paying
> attention but . . .
>
> "Roz." I have said over and over again that the anonymously remailed posting
> that has been attributed to Cannon cannot ever be proved to have been
> Cannon's work. I have also stated over and over again that it simply does
> not matter who the original author was. I have stated as many or more times
> it is repeating this libelous post either in snippets or in its entirety or
> linking to it by the stAUKers that constitutes libel by them.
The ringleaders of Quackbusters, a guerrilla warfare outfit who are/
were allies of AUK's guerrilla warriors, sought to bankrupt a health
lover by the name of Ilena Rosenthal by filing a libel suit against
Rosenthal for having republished a newsletter authored by Tim Bolen
which contained a great many disparaging remarks about Barrett and the
other ringleaders of Quackbusters.
Barrett et al lost their suit against Ilena, and, later lost their
appeal, too.
See Barrett V Rosenthal.
Based upon that precedent, I don't believe the courts are likely to
find anyone guilty of libel for merely republishing the disparaging
and/or defamatory remarks authored by another.
However, in the case of Barrett Vs Rosenthal, Barrett was running a
guerrilla warfare outfit, not unlike their allies the AUKtards,
while Ilena Rosenthal was just one of the many health lovers or
"boils" whom Barrett's guerrilla warriors were saying and doing
whatever they could to lance off usenet, the WWW, and the face of the
earth, which included Barrett and the other ringleaders of his
guerrilla warfare group filing a SLAPP suit against Ilena Rosenthal.
In the case of Novins Vs. Cannon, Novins is one of the many "boils"
whom AUK's guerrilla warriors had crowned/larted to solicit others
aggression against Novins, to "lance" Novins off usenet, the WWW,
and/or the face of the earth.
Because the AUktard's had crowned/larted Novins to solicit others to
publish disparaging and defamatory articles about Novins, then,
republished the disparaging and defamatory articles they themselves
had solicited, it's possible that Novins can prevail in a lawsuit
against the Auktards for torts and civil conspiracy.
If Novins does prevail, maybe law enforcement agencies will finally
get off their arses and prosecute the Auktards for the crimes which
their libel / soliciting libel / republishing libel is merely one
element of, where most of their targets are concerned, which is,
Conspiracy to Blackmail, Terrorize and/or Murder by Proxy.
Aratzio
alt.usenet.kooks, Linda <indomi...@gmail.com> got double secret
probation for writing:
Next up, Hoofprints with her delusional take on the Novins v. Cannon
and how that affects the horsey porn industry.
Aratzio
Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> got double secret probation for
writing:
>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:58:21 -0700 (PDT), Linda
><indomi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
><snik>
>
>>If Novins does prevail, maybe law enforcement agencies will finally
>>get off their arses and prosecute the Auktards for the crimes which
>>their libel / soliciting libel / republishing libel is merely one
>>element of, where most of their targets are concerned, which is,
>>Conspiracy to Blackmail, Terrorize and/or Murder by Proxy.
>
>
>...heh
Really, we use anonymous proxy for murders. I hate when the kooks fget
that wrong.
"The Great One"
"Linda" <indomi...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:cc18a2d5-aefd-4699...@u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com...
See Barrett V Rosenthal.
***********************************************
YES !!
Finally the TRVTH !!
--
John C.
"The Great One"
"Meat Plow" <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:389i8s....@news.alt.net...
> >get off their arses and prosecute the Auktards for the crimes which
> >their libel / soliciting libel / republishing libel is merely one
> >element of, where most of their targets are concerned, which is,
> >Conspiracy to Blackmail, Terrorize and/or Murder by Proxy.
>
>
You're an Idiot, Meat Plow !!
--
John C.
"The Great One"
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:0v8ke51es8ms3n4h3...@4ax.com...
Roz "fget" Ratzio, you're an Idiot !!
--
John C.
the messenjah
wrote:
> "Linda" <indomitab...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:cc18a2d5-aefd-4699...@u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com...
>
> - Show quoted text -
The case was dismissed... But Kevin Cannon has tainted TSB Bearings
Group's reputation with his online harassment even though he and his
father are too stupid to realize it.
Gregory Hall
news:f93846a5-2708-4b86...@r31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
The case was dismissed "without prejudice" which means "dismissed on a
technicality." The technicality is that Atlas Bugged did not respond in a
timely fashion to interrogatories. Atlas has sixty days from the date of the
dismissal (Sept 25) to refile. If he fails to do so by November 25 then the
dismissal stands.
But, Atlas Bugged is way too brilliant a barrister to fail to refile. He's
just playing the cards intelligently, biding his time, gathering more
incriminating information and securing his excellent chances of resounding
victory over the stAUKer cabalists.
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:28:23 -0700 (PDT), the messenjah
> <theguyo...@veryfast.biz>wrote:
>
>>The case was dismissed... But Kevin Cannon has tainted TSB Bearings
>>Group's reputation with his online harassment even though he and his
>>father are too stupid to realize it.
>
>
> ...heh
Aw poor baby Meat Blow, still stuffing Twinkies into his fat pimply face. .
.
--
Gregory Hall
the messenjah
> "the messenjah" <theguyontheb...@veryfast.biz> wrote in message
Thanks for the update... I see Meat Plow has come out to whine... But
then again he always acts like a dumbass.
>
> --
> Gregory Hall- Hide quoted text -
K. A. Cannon
<38bgc6....@news.alt.net> in alt.usenet.kooks on Fri, 30 Oct 2009
09:48:15 -0400:
<snip>
This proves you really have no clue what is happening.
funny.
--
K. A. Cannon
kevin.a.cannon at gmail dot com
Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.
It's already tomorrow in Australia.
-Charles Schultz
COOSN-266-06-02374
Hammer of Thor, April 2005
PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER June 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle X 2
#9 People ruining UseNet lits.
#6 Top Assholes on the Net lits.
#5 Most hated Usenetizens of all time
#15 AUK psychos and felons lits
#5 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
http://www.themonastery.org/dev/cert/ulc_certificate_view.swf?id=10010810040414
Linda
wrote:
So Novins could proceed with the case in Federal District Court,
where Pacer reports Novins has refiled it.
Linda
> But Kevin Cannon has tainted TSB Bearings
> Group's reputation with his online harassment even though he and his
> father are too stupid to realize it.
Companies working the "dark side" aren't concerned about the companies
reputation, since, a company with a bad rep can always change their
name as Blackwater, Inc did, or, sell themselves to another company
as CACI and Titan's Level3 Communications did.