Judge rules Trump false election claims while in office covered by presidential immunity

[Alfred Bond]

A Pennsylvania state judge ruled Monday that an election worker cannot sue
former President Trump over statements he made sowing doubt in the 2020
election results while in office, finding the statements are protected by
presidential immunity.

Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Erdos said Trump’s
immunity covered a tweet he issued and comments he made remotely from the
White House during a Pennsylvania state Senate committee hearing in
November 2020. The statements, made without evidence, claimed fraud in
Pennsylvania’s election tabulations.

“Other legal proceedings may examine the propriety of his statements and
actions while he was the President and whether, as the plaintiffs in this
and other cases contend, it was this conduct which served as the actual
threat to our democracy,” Erdos ruled. “But this case is not the proper
place to do so. Here, Trump is entitled to Presidential immunity.”

James Savage, a Pennsylvania voting machine supervisor in the 2020
election, filed two lawsuits — which have since been consolidated —
alleging that Trump, Rudy Giuliani, two poll watchers and others conspired
to defame him. Savage says their statements led him to receive death
threats and suffer two heart attacks.

Erdos ruled Trump has immunity for the tweet and the remarks at the state
Senate hearing because both statements were made while he was serving as
president. But the lawsuit also contains claims over a letter Trump wrote
to the House Jan. 6 committee last October, which Trump is not immune from
as it was written after leaving office.

Erdos ruled the two earlier statements were part of Trump’s official
duties, as he was speaking to the public on matters of public concern.

“Here, then-President Trump’s Gettysburg remarks and his tweet were
public,” Erdos wrote. “Moreover, the topic of these statements—claims from
third parties and the President himself about irregularities in the
Presidential election which on their face called into question the
integrity of the election and whether now-President Joseph Biden had been
duly elected—was undoubtedly a matter of great public concern.”

The Hill Elections 2024 coverage
Trump potentially faces a looming indictment in the Justice Department’s
probe of the transfer of power following the 2020 election and the lead up
to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Trump’s unfounded claims of mass
electoral fraud are also the subject of several other civil lawsuits,
which remain tied up in other courts and for which he has similarly
asserted immunity.

“We are pleased with the Court’s decision to honor the long-standing
principle of Presidential Immunity,” Trump legal spokeswoman Alina Habba
said in a statement.

“Today, the Court made it clear that it is well within the President’s
discretion to address the integrity of our election without fear of
liability,” Habba continued. “We expect that the rest of Mr. Savage’s
claims will similarly be disposed of as they are without merit.”

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4130582-judge-rules-trump-
false-election-claims-while-in-office-covered-by-presidential-immunity/