Building 7 was unquestionably brought down by controlled demolition. If the
defense brings that up, the "official story" collapses!!
In a civilian trial that could happen and makes you wonder does Bammer
understand what he's getting into. Is this his way of exposing 911 truth
without actually doing it himself?
: Building 7 was unquestionably brought down by controlled demolition. If the
: defense brings that up, the "official story" collapses!!
It's only unquestionable to you and a few other 911 kookers. Those in touch
with reality know that it wasn't.
--
-------------------
Keep working dumbo needs the money
>In article <Xns9CC473C78AC70r...@216.168.3.70>,
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Building 7 was unquestionably brought down by controlled demolition. If the
>> defense brings that up, the "official story" collapses!!
>
>How would that be relevant? Assuming this comes to trial, what matters is how
>Mhohammed provided financing and planning before the events, not the sequence of
>destruction.
>
>> In a civilian trial that could happen and makes you wonder does Bammer
>> understand what he's getting into. Is this his way of exposing 911 truth
>> without actually doing it himself?
>
>A judge isn't going to let a trial wander off into matters not relevant to the
>question at hand. American trials are focussed affairs rather than general
>investigations.
Are you kidding?? I guess you didn't watch the OJ Simpson trial.
However, federal trials are somewhat better than state trials in that
the judges are not as beholden to the legal establishment. Therefore
they are more likely to slam down lawyers who wants to bring up every
conceivable issue in their effort to blow as much smoke and sand as
possible.
> In article <Xns9CC473C78AC70r...@216.168.3.70>,
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Building 7 was unquestionably brought down by controlled demolition.
>> If the defense brings that up, the "official story" collapses!!
>
> How would that be relevant? Assuming this comes to trial, what matters
> is how Mhohammed provided financing and planning before the events,
> not the sequence of destruction.
>
HAHAHA. You govt shills are way too obvious. If the attacks were done by
USA/Israel, instead of KSM ... then yeah, i think that would be relevant.
HAHAHAHAHA. Keep it up shillboy. We're laughing our butts off at you.
> In alt.politics.usa.republican Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
> <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>: Building 7 was unquestionably brought down by controlled demolition.
>: If the defense brings that up, the "official story" collapses!!
>
> It's only unquestionable to you and a few other 911 kookers. Those in
> touch with reality know that it wasn't.
HAHAHA. The paid govt shills come crawling out of the woodwork at the
mention of Building 7. I don't blame you for being afraid since that's the
smokiest gun in history.
That's a physical impossibility, proven.
> If the
> defense brings that up, the "official story" collapses!!
BWAAHAAAHAHAHA!!! KSM has admitted it, you stupid bird brain.
> In a civilian trial that could happen and makes you wonder does Bammer
> understand what he's getting into. Is this his way of exposing 911 truth
> without actually doing it himself?
9/11 Truthers have been exposed as total morons.
> On Nov 15, 11:22�am, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
> <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Building 7 was unquestionably brought down by controlled demolition.
>
> That's a physical impossibility, proven.
>
>
Now that is really absurd, even for a PGS like you. Cont demo is the
ONLIEST explanation that works.
Your inability to refute my PROVEN FACT is NOTED.
> Cont demo is the
> ONLIEST explanation that works.
It is physically impossible, proven so, for the WTC collapses to be
controlled demolition.
Try dealing with that, KKKook.
Who are these government paid shills you're dreaming up??
As a side note have any of you 911 kookers ever found ANY credible evidence
to support your fantasies?? Credible evidence only need apply. Keep your
kooker fantasies to yourself.
Evidence? We have proof - the collapse of building 7. How do you explain
a 600 feet high skyscraper that was a block away from the twin towers and
was NOT hit by a plane --- came str8 down at free fall speed!!!
There's only one explanation - controlled demo.
HAHAHA. Thanks for proving you have no arguments!!
WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane, but it was hit by panels from the WTC and
badly damaged and ravaged by fire. On 9/11, the FDNY monitored WTC7 with
instruments designed to detect any movement and found that it was slowly
sagging. They expected the building to collapse in the afternoon. It
stood until about 5:30P.
>
> There's only one explanation - controlled demo.
The only controlled demo here is the demonstration that you'll believe
anything.
Evading the issue again, i see. It must really suck to be a hater.
> On Nov 16, 9:22�ソスpm, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> inne
> ws:Xns9CC5D407B980Cr...@216.168.3.70:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in
>> >news:uPudne9m6qVt9pzW...@giganews.com:
>>
>> >> In alt.politics.usa.republican Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
>> >> MURDERERS <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>: Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in
>> >>:news:a9adnb0SSP1bwp3W...@giganews.com:
>>
>> >>: > In alt.politics.usa.republican Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
>> >>: > MURDERERS <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>: >
>> >>: >
>> >>: >: Building 7 was unquestionably brought down by controlled
>> >>: >: demolition. If the defense brings that up, the "official
>> >>: >: story" collapses!!
>> >>: >
>> >>: > It's only unquestionable to you and a few other 911 kookers.
>> >>: > Those in touch with reality know that it wasn't.
>>
>> >>: HAHAHA. �ソスThe paid govt shills come crawling out of the woodwork
>> >>: at the mention of Building 7. �ソスI don't blame you for being afraid
>> >>: sinc
> e
>> >>: that's the smokiest gun in history.
>>
>> >> Who are these government paid shills you're dreaming up??
>>
>> >> As a side note have any of you 911 kookers ever found ANY credible
>> >> evidence to support your fantasies?? Credible evidence only need
>> >> apply. Keep your kooker fantasies to yourself.
>>
>> > Evidence? �ソスWe have proof - the collapse of building 7. �ソスHow do you
>> > explain a 600 feet high skyscraper that was a block away from the
>> > twin towers and was NOT hit by a plane �ソス--- came str8 down at free
>> > fall speed!!!
>>
>> WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane, but it was hit by panels from the WTC and
>> badly damaged and ravaged by fire. �ソスOn 9/11, the FDNY monitored WTC7
>> with
>> instruments designed to detect any movement and found that it was
>> slowly sagging. �ソスThey expected the building to collapse in the
>> afternoon. �ソスIt stood until about 5:30P.
>>
>>
>>
>> > There's only one explanation - controlled demo.
>>
>> The only controlled demo here is the demonstration that you'll
>> believe anything.
>
> Evading the issue again, i see.
Nope. Right above. See it? Where I talk about the damage to the
building and its (relatively) slow degradation and eventual collpase.
It must really suck to be a hater.
You tell me. You're the hysteric about drunk driving.
>
: Evading the issue again, i see. It must really suck to be a hater.
I see that you still haven't been able to find any credible facts to support
your kooker theory.
>
> I see that you still haven't been able to find any credible facts to support
> your kooker theory.
Hey stupid. The internet is full of videos of the collapse of
Building 7. That's th smokiest gun in history.
> On Nov 17, 5:23�pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:
>> I see that you still haven't been able to find any credible facts to
>> support your kooker theory.
> Hey stupid.
Oh, look! An ignoramus calls someone stupid.
> The internet is full of videos of the collapse of
> Building 7. That's th smokiest gun in history.
Certinly was smoky. Mostly because of the fires that ravaged the interior
of WTC7.
> > The internet is full of videos of the collapse of
> > Building 7. That's th smokiest gun in history.
>
> Certinly was smoky. Mostly because of the fires that ravaged the interior
> of WTC7.
Fires??? HAHAHA. They were barely visible, you lying govt shill. And
yet we're told that caused the building to collapse str8 down at ff
speed!!!
> On Nov 18, 11:31�am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <beta...@earthlink.net> wrote
>
>> > The internet is full of videos of the collapse of
>> > Building 7. �That's th smokiest gun in history.
>>
>> Certinly was smoky. �Mostly because of the fires that ravaged the inter
> ior
>> of WTC7.
>
> Fires??? HAHAHA. They were barely visible, you lying govt shill.
The fires are clearly visible in the available videos. They burned for
hours since the FDNY couldn't fight them with the low water pressure
available.
> And
> yet we're told that caused the building to collapse str8 down at ff
> speed!!!
Ignoramuses like you think that somehow things subject to the earth's
gravity don't drop at "free fall speeds." When the interior columns of
WTC7 failed, there was nothing holding the floor up.
Still no credible evidence supporting your claim I see.
Yes. Raging uncontrolled fires over about a third of the floors.
> HAHAHA.
You find fire funny? Are you a pyromaniac, or simply a maniac?
> They were barely visible,
Well, kkkook, you have to open your fuckin' eyes.
>. And
> yet we're told that caused the building to collapse str8 down at ff
> speed!!!
Who told you that?
Oh, that's right, the other kooktards told you that.
Here in the real world, we have watches with second hands and know
that WTC7 did not fall at anything close to free fall speed.
Yeah - they were uncontrolled because the FD was ordered to leave them
alone. But they weren't raging. Had to look close to even see them.
And where did the fires come from anyway? No plane hit 7. Obviously
they were deliberately started to use as a cover story for the
impending controlled demo.
: Yeah - they were uncontrolled because the FD was ordered to leave them
: alone. But they weren't raging. Had to look close to even see them.
: And where did the fires come from anyway? No plane hit 7. Obviously
: they were deliberately started to use as a cover story for the
: impending controlled demo.
You're credible evidence that the fires were deliberatly started is.......??
> On Nov 19, 2:11�pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 10:50�am, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
>>
>> <beta...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> > On Nov 18, 11:31�am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <beta...@earthlink.net>
>> > > wrot
> e
>> > > > The internet is full of videos of the collapse of
>> > > > Building 7. �That's th smokiest gun in history.
>>
>> > > Certinly was smoky. �Mostly because of the fires that ravaged the
>> > > i
> nterior
>> > > of WTC7.
>>
>> > Fires???
>>
>> Yes. Raging uncontrolled fires over about a third of the floors.
>>
>
> Yeah - they were uncontrolled because the FD was ordered to leave them
> alone.
The FDNY did the ordering. The building had been evacuated and there
wasn't enough water pressure to fight the fires.
> But they weren't raging. Had to look close to even see them.
They were raging. The videos are on youtube.
> And where did the fires come from anyway? No plane hit 7.
Debris from the WTC towers, which were hit by planes.
> Obviously
> they were deliberately started to use as a cover story for the
> impending controlled demo.
Your claim; your burden. Let's have some evidence. "Obviously" doesn't
cut it, except to describe your ignorance.
They were uncontrolled because the water pressure went out and the
firefighters were pulled out because the building started to bulge and
it was apparent it was about to undergo a structural collapse.
> But they weren't raging.
Thety were of course. This is not even in dispute, It was engulfed in
flames.
> Had to look close to even see them.
Stop looking at pictures from early in the day, kookshit, and look at
ones from. A photograph is a snapshot in time... THINK.
> And where did the fires come from anyway? No plane hit 7.
You fuckin' moron. You've been told for YEARS. Tens of thousands of
tons of free falling girders and flaming debris crashed into WTC7 from
the collapse of WTC1.THIS IS ON VIDEO AS IT HAPPENED. It gouged out a
huge hole WTC7 for 18 or more floors and set of raging fires. Get a
brain and stop using drugs. Your parents would be grateful.
> Obviously
> they were deliberately started to use as a cover story for the
> impending controlled demo.
UBL deliberately started them.
Controlled demolition has been proven beyond doubt to be a complete
physical impossibility.
With the conspiracy loons, the lack of evidence IS the evidence.
--
Count your blessings by thinking of those whom you love.
>
> > And where did the fires come from anyway? No plane hit 7.
>
> You fuckin' moron. You've been told for YEARS. Tens of thousands of
> tons of free falling girders and flaming debris crashed into WTC7 from
> the collapse of WTC1.THIS IS ON VIDEO AS IT HAPPENED. It gouged out a
> huge hole WTC7 for 18 or more floors and set of raging fires. Get a
> brain and stop using drugs. Your parents would be grateful.
>
Tens of thousands of tons?? HAHAHA. More like a few tons. WTC1 did
NOT fall over sideways you moron. It collapsed str8 down too. And
what little damage occurred was, as you just admitted, on one side!!!
And yet the whole building collapsed in unison.
Do you enjoy being the board laughingstock?
> On Nov 20, 3:17�pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 20, 9:44�am, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
>>
>
>>
>> > And where did the fires come from anyway? �No plane hit 7.
>>
>> You fuckin' moron. You've been told for YEARS. Tens of thousands of
>> tons of free falling girders and flaming debris crashed into WTC7 from
>> the collapse of WTC1.THIS IS ON VIDEO AS IT HAPPENED. It gouged out a
>> huge hole WTC7 for 18 or more floors and set of raging fires. Get a
>> brain and stop using drugs. Your parents would be grateful.
>>
>
> Tens of thousands of tons?? HAHAHA. More like a few tons. WTC1 did
> NOT fall over sideways you moron. It collapsed str8 down too.
Some outside panels fell outward. There's videotape.
> And
> what little damage occurred was, as you just admitted, on one side!!!
Causing severe damage.
> And yet the whole building collapsed in unison.
After the interior burned for hours.
> Do you enjoy being the board laughingstock?
Not to worry. Your title is safe
>On Nov 20, 3:17�pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 20, 9:44�am, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
>>
>
>>
>> > And where did the fires come from anyway? �No plane hit 7.
>>
>> You fuckin' moron. You've been told for YEARS. Tens of thousands of
>> tons of free falling girders and flaming debris crashed into WTC7 from
>> the collapse of WTC1.THIS IS ON VIDEO AS IT HAPPENED. It gouged out a
>> huge hole WTC7 for 18 or more floors and set of raging fires. Get a
>> brain and stop using drugs. Your parents would be grateful.
>>
>
>Tens of thousands of tons?? HAHAHA. More like a few tons. WTC1 did
>NOT fall over sideways you moron. It collapsed str8 down too.
Some of it went to the side as well.
>And
>what little damage occurred was, as you just admitted, on one side!!!
>And yet the whole building collapsed in unison.
After the interior burned for many hours, weakening its support.
>
>Do you enjoy being the board laughingstock?
Iarnrod has a ways to go before he removes the title from you.
Yes. It is all seen on video, bonehead. Stop denying reality and take
a look at the videos. Your paretns are extremely embarrassed by yoru
kookshit behavior.
> WTC1 did NOT fall over sideways you moron.
Who said it did.
> It collapsed str8 down too.
Spell words out, shit for brains. This isn't txting here.
> And
> what little damage occurred was, as you just admitted, on one side!!!
It was massive damage and one side is all that is necessary to gouge
an 18-story hole in the fuckin' thing, dope, and set off raging
uncontrolled fires. If it had *missed* then you might have a point.
> And yet the whole building collapsed in unison.
No it did not, shithead. The south side fell into the street before
the roof collapsed. It's what pulled the whole thing down.
> Do you enjoy being the board laughingstock?
Projection. You're the one providing the yucks, kkklown.
Their fantasies are all the proof they need.
I> Yes. It is all seen on video, bonehead. Stop denying reality and take
I> a look at the videos. Your paretns are extremely embarrassed by yoru
I> kookshit behavior.
These 911 conspiracy NUTS want you to not believe your "LYING EYES."
These whackjobs claim it was a PLANED demolition by DICK CHENEY! How come
people didn't hear successive explosions as the buildings pancaked like you
DO when a building is being leveled by a demolition company? Did DICKEY use
secret silent explosives? These people need to be in rubber rooms, QUICK
before they hurt themselves with a sharp object.
> These 911 conspiracy NUTS want you to not believe your "LYING EYES."
> These whackjobs claim it was a PLANED demolition by DICK CHENEY! How come
> people didn't hear successive explosions as the buildings pancaked like you
> DO when a building is being leveled by a demolition company? Did DICKEY use
> secret silent explosives? These people need to be in rubber rooms, QUICK
> before they hurt themselves with a sharp object.
Many people have said they did hear explosions. Anyway, controlled
demo is the only explanation that fits the facts on Building 7. No
way small fires or even huge fires would cause the building to just
collapse all at once. Most obvious thing in the world and only the
sheep and the shills say otherwise.
: > ?? ?? These 911 conspiracy NUTS want you to not believe your "LYING EYES."
If it's so obvious then why can't any of you 911 kookers present any
credible evidence to support your fantasies??
> On Nov 22, 3:24�am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> � � These 911 conspiracy NUTS want you to not believe your "LYING EYE
> S."
>> These whackjobs claim it was a PLANED demolition by DICK CHENEY! How
>> come people didn't hear successive explosions as the buildings
>> pancaked like y
> ou
>> DO when a building is being leveled by a demolition company? Did
>> DICKEY u
> se
>> secret silent explosives? These people need to be in rubber rooms,
>> QUICK before they hurt themselves with a sharp object.
>
> Many people have said they did hear explosions.
Please name them and tell us how they knew what they heard were
explosive devices going off.
> Anyway, controlled
> demo is the only explanation that fits the facts on Building 7.
Wrong, as usual.
> No
> way small fires or even huge fires would cause the building to just
> collapse all at once.
These were not small fires, but fires that burned for hours that gutted
the interior and weakened the columns holding up the building. The
building did not collapse "all at once." The FDNY monitored the
building with instruments all day. When it began to sag, they announced
an imminent collapse.
> Most obvious thing in the world and only the sheep and the shills say
> otherwise.
Everything is obvious to an ignoramus because prejudice and opinion are
much easier than learning anything.
They heard loud noises... NONE heard ANY controlled demolition
explosives going off ... THAT IS AN OBSERVABLE PROVEN FACT since NONE
are going off at collapse initiation. NONE.
> Anyway, controlled
> demo is the only explanation that fits the facts on Building 7.
There is nothing at all about the collapse of WTC7, predicted hours
beforehand because the massive structural damage it sustained and the
raging uncontrolled fires that consumed it resulted in observable
bulging of the exterior wall, that resembles controlled demolition.
Nothing about it even looks like it, starting with the PROVEN FACT
that there were no CD explosives going off at collapse initiation.
> No
> way small fires or even huge fires would cause the building to just
> collapse all at once.
It didn't. It was progressive starting with the transfer beam,
resulting in imbalanced loading that the remaining supports were never
designed to hold. The south side of the building fell into Vesey
Street before the first sign of collapse from the north in the videos,
which is the east penthouse collapse. The entire visible collapse
sequence from the north side takes 16 seconds -- FACT -- which you can
time on all the videos. By this point there is no longer a south side
of the building... it is gone.
> Most obvious thing in the world and only the sheep and the shills say otherwise.
You are a delusional kook who denies what the videos plainly show...
NO CD EXPLOSIVES ARE TO BE SEEN GOING OFF. You are lying and making
shit up out of thin air and you expect fellow kooks to believe it.
> These 911 conspiracy NUTS want you to not believe your "LYING EYES."
> These whackjobs claim it was a PLANED demolition by DICK CHENEY! How come
> people didn't hear successive explosions as the buildings pancaked like
> you
> DO when a building is being leveled by a demolition company? Did DICKEY
> use
> secret silent explosives? These people need to be in rubber rooms, QUICK
> before they hurt themselves with a sharp object.
S> Many people have said they did hear explosions. Anyway, controlled
S> demo is the only explanation that fits the facts on Building 7. No
S> way small fires or even huge fires would cause the building to just
S> collapse all at once. Most obvious thing in the world and only the
S> sheep and the shills say otherwise.
BULLSHIT!
I> They heard loud noises... NONE heard ANY controlled demolition
I> explosives going off ... THAT IS AN OBSERVABLE PROVEN FACT since NONE
I> are going off at collapse initiation. NONE.
A 100+ story building collapsing is NOT going to be silent. What the
conspiracy NUT seem to forget is that there is continuous VIDEO of the
buildings collapsing with AUDIO. No demolition sounds. Given that there were
about 20 news agencies (plus an unknown number of civilians) who taped the
event, trying to claim that it is all a MASSIVE CONSPIRACY and they ALL are
in on it is just more than a little loopy. But - this US Usenet and there
are MANY fans of Art Bell and Mr. Noury who believe that they have been
having sex with outer space aliens.
> > No
> > way small fires or even huge fires would cause the building to just
> > collapse all at once.
>
> These were not small fires, but fires that burned for hours
HAHAHAHA. So now the size of an object depends on how long it
exists?? I got a candle and if i let it burn for hours that makes it
a BIG fire!!!! HAHA
HAHAHA. As usual, all the govt shills can do is say conspiracies are
impossible.!!
: HAHAHA. As usual, all the govt shills can do is say conspiracies are
: impossible.!!
Still no credible evidence to support your kooker theories. Where's the
credible proof?
In relation to the size of the object burning, of course, you ignoramus.
How much of the candle is left after it burns for hours?
How much of the interior of WTC7 was intact after it burned for hours?
Analogies not your strong point, eh?
What kind of drugs are you on tonight? That made no sense even by your
low standards. I am starting to worry whether you can continue to
provide the same level of kooker komedy gold that you usually give us
here.
Will KSM defense team use "inside job" angle?
---
it doesn't matter
the jews in NYC will be dancing in the streets having tried a muslim
in front of the whole planet
don't be surprised when a radical muslim kills a bunch of jews