Genuine question for atheists
Kadaitcha Man
--
Ubuntu 9.10 x64 running Windows Server 2008 in VirtualBox
16GB 1333MHz DDR3 RAM, 10 * SATA2 3GB/s HDDs as dual 3TB RAID5
8-thread Intel Extreme i7-975 @ 3.80GHz, air-cooled Thermaltake
Intel BoneTrail Motherboard
Dual nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS 1GB
Honda Sabre 1100cc V-Twin
I can wank better than you can.
PS: Jensen Interceptor in air-conditioned storage.
Dan Listermann
"Kadaitcha Man" <an...@no.email> wrote in message
news:e33nei$sdr$2...@alt.conspiracy.conjunctivitis.of.the.penis.biz.india...
> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>
Kadaitcha Man
blood suckers, ye retched:
> Brilliant!
It must be terrible having no other frame of reference.
Dan Listermann
"Kadaitcha Man" <an...@no.email> wrote in message
> Dan Listermann, ye boil-brained island carrion, a knot you are of damned
> blood suckers, ye retched:
>
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <an...@no.email> wrote in message
>> news:e33nei$sdr$2...@alt.conspiracy.conjunctivitis.of.the.penis.biz.india...
>
>>> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>
>> Brilliant!
>
> It must be terrible having no other frame of reference.
>
duke
>Brilliant!
Which is why we laugh at you so much.
The Dukester, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
Kadaitcha Man
should infect my hands, ye chalked:
lol
Dan Listermann
"duke" <duckg...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:6o6re5tsdg5cd5899...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:05:40 -0500, "Dan Listermann" <d...@listermann.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Kadaitcha Man" <an...@no.email> wrote in message
>>news:e33nei$sdr$2...@alt.conspiracy.conjunctivitis.of.the.penis.biz.india...
>>> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>
>>Brilliant!
>
> Which is why we laugh at you so much.
>
Kadaitcha Man
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:05:40 -0500, "Dan Listermann"
> <d...@listermann.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <an...@no.email> wrote in message
>> news:e33nei$sdr$2...@alt.conspiracy.conjunctivitis.of.the.penis.biz.india...
>>> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>
>> Brilliant!
>
> Which is why we laugh at you so much.
Go and get fucked, you duff cunt. "Dan Listermann" has done nothing to
deserve being lamed by the likes of you, you disgusting, stinking fuckslime.
Good God! The man has a brain, which is a whole brain more than can be said
of you.
panam...@hotmail.com
snip stuff
> PS: Jensen Interceptor in air-conditioned storage.
Really? Those things are seriously cool.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
Lee
"Kadaitcha Man" <an...@no.email> wrote in message
news:e33nei$sdr$2...@alt.conspiracy.conjunctivitis.of.the.penis.biz.india...
Actually to be honest it is not as bad as one would initially expect for
instance you are independent of this kind of thing:
http://arcticchicken.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/fred_phelps04.jpg
Do not have to do this:
http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/2008/04/12/muslims%20praying%20in%20mosque.jpg
http://www.topnews.in/files/mecca_0.jpg
http://www.theblogofrecord.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ashura.jpg
http://www.1st-art-gallery.com/thumbnail/131274/1/Mandran-Indian-Initiation-Ceremony,-1871.jpg
So in retrospect considering the ease of finding imagery portraying the
various religions doing crazy stuff then being a fuckwit seems the
lesser of the two evils.
Aratzio
alt.usenet.kooks, panam...@hotmail.com got double secret probation
for writing:
So, for what does he need air conditioning?
Jensen Engineer:
"Hey, lets put a shit load of weight up front, not balance the braking
properly, use a narrow wheel well so we can't put wider tires and then
make it go fast"
Mitchell Holman
>
>
> Go and get fucked, you duff cunt.
Why are you Christians so full of hate?
"I want you to let a wave of hatred wash over you. Yes, hate
is good. Our goal is a Christian nation. We have a biblical
duty, we are called on by God to conquer this country. We
don't want equal time. We don't want pluralism."
-- Randall Terry, devout Christian and pro-life founder
of Operation Rescue
Deadrat
news:Xns9CB690043135B...@216.196.97.130:
> Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote in
> news:bpz1vk$5nh$0...@alt.games.horny.nurses.biz.turkey:
>
>>
>>
>> Go and get fucked, you duff cunt.
>
>
> Why are you Christians so full of hate?
It's the Christian thing to do.
Steve O
> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
Says the expert on fuckwittery
--
Steve O
a.a.2240
BAAWA
Convicted by Earthquack
Exempt from Purgatory by Papal Indulgence
§ñühw¤£f
> Mitchell Holman <noe...@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:Xns9CB690043135B...@216.196.97.130:
>
> > Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote in
> > news:bpz1vk$5nh$0...@alt.games.horny.nurses.biz.turkey:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Go and get fucked, you duff cunt.
> >
> >
> > Why are you Christians so full of hate?
>
>
> It's the Christian thing to do.
>
Fuck it...lets cover all the bases: humans hate.
Deal with it.
HTH
--
http://www.care2.com/click-to-donate/wolves/
Proof of Americas 3rd world status:
http://www.ramusa.org/
Cash for *who*?
http://www.bartcop.com/list-the-facts.htm
http://www.pavlovianobeisance.com/
Uncle Vic
> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>
I don't know, have you stopped beating your wife?
You don't actually believe in that jebus nonsense, do you? I thought you
were smarter than that.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Christians are like Slinkys. They're boring, but they'll put a smile on
your face when you push them down the stairs.
panam...@hotmail.com
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:52:25 -0800 (PST), in the land of
> for writing:
>
> >On Nov 1, 10:06 am, Kadaitcha Man <a...@no.email> wrote:
>
> >snip stuff
>
> >> PS: Jensen Interceptor in air-conditioned storage.
>
> >Really? Those things are seriously cool.
>
> >-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
> >aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
>
> So, for what does he need air conditioning?
Eh, I'm a car guy. I had a car in storage without it (the building,
not the car). The reduced humidity helps preserve the thing.
> Jensen Engineer:
> "Hey, lets put a shit load of weight up front, not balance the braking
> properly, use a narrow wheel well so we can't put wider tires and then
> make it go fast"
You forgot "..hey, we don't need to build our own engine.."
The only time I've been able to wring out a 4WD car, a buddy of mine
with a Subie WRX let me drive the thing. Weight up front, check.
Braking properly..well, I gotta admit cars have changed in thirty
years. <g>
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
Kadaitcha Man
art deformed, crooked, old and sere, ill-faced, worse bodied, shapeless
everywhere, vicious, ungentle, foolish, blunt, unkind, stigmatical in
making, worse in mind, ye fudged together:
> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
>
>> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>>
>
> I don't know, have you stopped beating your wife?
What wife?
> You don't actually believe in that jebus nonsense, do you? I thought
> you were smarter than that.
How smart do you suppose it is to argue that someone is less intelligent
than yourself by your implicating a conclusion that is not logically
connected to your premise, dimbulb?
Kadaitcha Man
in thee than in a wild duck, ye excoriated:
> Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote in
> news:bpz1vk$5nh$0...@alt.games.horny.nurses.biz.turkey:
>
>>
>>
>> Go and get fucked, you duff cunt.
>
>
> Why are you Christians so full of hate?
Why do you fuckwit atheists believe in things are created solely by your
wild imaginations?
Kadaitcha Man
senseless thing, ye gabbled:
> "Kadaitcha Man" <an...@no.email> wrote in message
> news:e33nei$sdr$2...@alt.conspiracy.conjunctivitis.of.the.penis.biz.india...
>> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>
>
> Actually to be honest
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA!
chrisv
>One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
*plonk*
chrisv
>Kadaitcha Man wrote:
*plonk*
Lookout
wrote:
>Uncle Vic, ye seven-chinned idle immaterial skein of sleeve silk, thou
>art deformed, crooked, old and sere, ill-faced, worse bodied, shapeless
>everywhere, vicious, ungentle, foolish, blunt, unkind, stigmatical in
>making, worse in mind, ye fudged together:
>
>> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
>>
>>> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>>>
>>
>> I don't know, have you stopped beating your wife?
>
>What wife?
Of course no woman would be with you. That surprises no one.
>
>> You don't actually believe in that jebus nonsense, do you? I thought
>> you were smarter than that.
>
>How smart do you suppose it is to argue that someone is less intelligent
>than yourself by your implicating a conclusion that is not logically
>connected to your premise, dimbulb?
Still waiting for you to prove a god exists.
Pavlov
wrote:
>Steve O wrote:
>
>>Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>
>*plonk*
Plonk for chisy
The Chief Instigator
> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>
I have no idea of that...maybe you should ask yourself.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Grand Rapids 3, Houston 1 (October 30)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, November 1 at Texas, 5:05
Kadaitcha Man
word, ye denunciated:
Good. Keep waiting.
Kadaitcha Man
ye sly devil, ye broker that still breaks the pate of faith, ye daily
break-vow, ye trembled:
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:40:34 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email>
> wrote:
>> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>>
>
> I have no idea of that...maybe you should ask yourself.
Wow! An IKYABWAI lame! Never seen one of them before!
chrisv
>On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:40:34 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
*plonk*
Lookout
wrote:
>, ye wood-headed bugbane, thou bawd, thou broker, thou all changing
>word, ye denunciated:
>
>> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:37:07 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Uncle Vic, ye seven-chinned idle immaterial skein of sleeve silk,
>>> thou art deformed, crooked, old and sere, ill-faced, worse bodied,
>>> shapeless everywhere, vicious, ungentle, foolish, blunt, unkind,
>>> stigmatical in making, worse in mind, ye fudged together:
>>>
>>>> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't know, have you stopped beating your wife?
>>>
>>> What wife?
>>
>> Of course no woman would be with you. That surprises no one.
>>>
>>>> You don't actually believe in that jebus nonsense, do you? I
>>>> thought you were smarter than that.
>>>
>>> How smart do you suppose it is to argue that someone is less
>>> intelligent than yourself by your implicating a conclusion that is
>>> not logically connected to your premise, dimbulb?
>>
>> Still waiting for you to prove a god exists.
>
>Good. Keep waiting.
You can't. I beat you silly!
You believe in a fairy tale!!
You're a raving lunatic who believes in a fairy tale. I have no doubt
when you can no longer afford the Internet you'll be screaming at the
top of your lungs and the nearest busy intersection.
Uncle Vic
>> Still waiting for you to prove a god exists.
>
> Good. Keep waiting.
LOL
Uncle Vic
ROFL.
Don't look now, it's one of those guys out to plonk everyone on usenet. He
likes his quiet, I guess.
Kadaitcha Man
retched:
> One fine day in alt.atheism, chrisv <chr...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Uncle Vic wrote:
>>
>>> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
>>
>> *plonk*
>>
>>
>
> ROFL.
>
> Don't look now, it's one of those guys out to plonk everyone on
> usenet. He likes his quiet, I guess.
He plonks anyone who replies me.
--
The deuterium zetabaseline servicing activation circuitry is suspect.
You will need to circumvent the astrophysical automatter enabling
converter with a centicapacitor and an automaplane. Check the
distribution of the biscrewdriver lens.
Muttley
(in article
<m7afhl$0m0$1...@rec.games.thats.not.milk.thats.pus.you.bitch.biz.samoa>):
> Uncle Vic, ye alcoholic whoreson cur, thy wife's a hobby-horse, ye
> retched:
>
>> One fine day in alt.atheism, chrisv <chr...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Uncle Vic wrote:
>>>
>>>> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
>>>
>>> *plonk*
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ROFL.
>>
>> Don't look now, it's one of those guys out to plonk everyone on
>> usenet. He likes his quiet, I guess.
>
> He plonks anyone who replies me.
>
>
Ive always liked Kadaitcha Man.
Havent we all always liked Kadaitcha Man?
--
http://www.defrettenark.be/
http://miserableconfessions.blogspot.com/
krp
"Uncle Vic" <add...@withheld.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9CB8D0C3...@216.196.97.131...
> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
>
>>> Still waiting for you to prove a god exists.
>>
>> Good. Keep waiting.
>
> LOL
Still waiting on PROOF that he doesn't exist.
pongespob
> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
You clearly have a better frame of reference as to the fuckwit
condition than most.
Deadrat
$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com:
Those who make the claims are required to produce the evidence.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
pandora
> One fine day in alt.atheism, chrisv <chr...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Uncle Vic wrote:
> >
> >>One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
> >
> > *plonk*
> >
> >
>
> ROFL.
>
> Don't look now, it's one of those guys out to plonk everyone on usenet.
He
> likes his quiet, I guess.
Seems to be a whole lotta plonking goin on round these here parts.
krp
"Anonymous" <cri...@ecn.org> wrote in message
news:2009110419082...@www.ecn.org...
And yet *I* don't NEED to be anonymous.
>>>> Still waiting for you to prove a god exists.
>
>>> Good. Keep waiting.
>> LOL
KP> Still waiting on PROOF that he doesn't exist.
> Still waiting for you to grow a brain, Ken Pangborn. The argument from
> ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam ("appeal to
> ignorance" or negative evidence, is a logical FALLACY in which idiots
> like you claime that a premise is true only because it has not been
> proven false, or is false only because it has not been proven true. Do
> you know what the word FALLACY means, Miss Pangborn?
If you can demand PROOF that God exists, why can't I demand that YOU
prove that he doesn't?
Syd M.
Because that's not how it works, fat-boy.
The one making the positive claim has the burden to provide proof.
And you and all the other theists have consistently failed to do just
that.
PDW
Robibnikoff
"krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4af165b8$0$5681$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
You would be - you are that stupid.
When are you going to provide evidence leprechuans don't exist, you stupid
fuck.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & Belly Dancer Supreme
BAAWA Knight
#1557
Deadrat
$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com:
You can demand all you want, but generally we expect the person making the
affirmative claim to provide the evidence. Espeically an extraordinary
claim.
Yap
OK.
I provide some of the convincing proof:
1). Katrina killed lots of Christians - proof of god's non- existence.
2). Big California quake killed scores of Christians - proof of god's
non-existence.
3). Tsunami claimed hundred of thousands of human lives (some were
Christians) - another proof.
4). Thousands of Christians die in car accidents in US each month -
another proof
5). Terrorists brought down the twin towers in 9/11 - no god warning,
another proof
6). US president Kennedy death on a terrorist bullet - trusted god but
died, another proof
Tons more......tangible cases and real proofs.
Virgil
<a1fe0e7d1ed3a451...@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info>,
"Non scrivetemi" <nonscr...@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info> wrote:
> If you can demand PROOF that God exists, why can't I demand that YOU
> prove that he doesn't?
You can demand proofs either way, but the usual default position on
"existence" is that unless there is evidence supporting existence, one
is free to reject it.
Any other position would be quite foolish.
Just consider the list of all the gods worshiped throughout history,
particularly those no longer popular. By your sort of argument one would
have to accept every single one of them as still existing until one has
positive proof of their nonexistence.
When, as is the case, there is no better evidence for the existence of
any currently popular god than for any long forgotten ones, what
justifies your claim that any currently popular god has any more actual
existence than those long forgotten ones?
> Don't guess you can ever claim you were president of the debate team
> at your "Ididn'tgotocollege U".
I will choose as my topic for debate that every proposed god throughout
history has the same amount of evidence for its existence as any other.
> Isn't that right Miss Pangborn? I get
> how that stupid question might make an idiot like you feel like you came
> back with a "clever" comeback, but that is only because you're so
> frickin DUMB.
How dumb is it to see that Zeus, or any member of his pantheon, has as
much actual existence as any modern image of god.
Larry
news:a1fe0e7d1ed3a451...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net:
> If you can demand PROOF that God exists, why can't I demand that YOU
> prove that he doesn't?
>
>
If anything so powerful existed, you'd be able to see him/her/it.
If anything so powerful existed, it would make sure it was the only being
worshipped on all planets.
If anything so powerful existed, mass communications would take place at
least once in over 3000 years.
As no such being exists, there is not a shred of real evidence it does, or
ever, existed, except in the minds of superstitious humans who are so
stupid they think they can communicate with it by holding hands in a burger
joint and thinking a plea.
If anything so powerful existed, it could heal the sick and grow back
missing and defective parts of its creation, especially ones missing from
its subjects praying to it for 3000 years. Not a single finger has ever
been replaced, more proof of its non-existence.
We don't need to DEMAND proof....If it existed, it would be so pissed off
at me it would have killed me 50 years ago when I stopped believing in this
IMAGINARY MYTH!
--
Larry
Larry
@bignews.usenetmonster.com:
> Just consider the list of all the gods worshiped throughout history,
> particularly those no longer popular. By your sort of argument one would
> have to accept every single one of them as still existing until one has
> positive proof of their nonexistence.
>
>
--
Larry
Kadaitcha Man
offence, and every man should beat thee, ye indicted:
Problem solved...
*plonk*
--
The encapsulated paraplasma varying diode is damaged. You will need to
circumvent the obfuscatory centiphoton supporting confinement field
using a monostablescraper and a retromallet. You may need a new stupid
vacuum tube.
Muttley
(in article
<abw4rp$m17$f...@alt.conspiracy.gray-haired-destitute.com.somaliland>):
> pongespob, ye fool-born cursing hypocrite, methink thou art a general
> offence, and every man should beat thee, ye indicted:
>
>> On Nov 1, 8:40 am, Kadaitcha Man <a...@no.email> wrote:
>>> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>>
>>
>> You clearly have a better frame of reference as to the fuckwit
>> condition than most.
>
> Problem solved...
>
> *plonk*
>
>
Are you losing the plot there Kadaitcha Man?
Kent Wills
wrote:
>> Still waiting for you to grow a brain, Ken Pangborn. The argument from
>> ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam ("appeal to
>> ignorance" or negative evidence, is a logical FALLACY in which idiots
>> like you claime that a premise is true only because it has not been
>> proven false, or is false only because it has not been proven true. Do
>> you know what the word FALLACY means, Miss Pangborn?
>
> If you can demand PROOF that God exists, why can't I demand that YOU
>prove that he doesn't?
You may demand whatever you wish. However, expecting proof
either way is a fool's run.
There is no way to prove that any god does or does not exist.
Religion is a belief system. One either believes [insert god of
choice here] exists, or one believes [insert god of choice here] does
not exist.
Kent Wills
wrote:
You'll never see it.
One can't prove that any god exists or doesn't exist. People
either believe a god (or gods) does (do) exist or they believe a god
(or gods) does not.
Proving or disproving a belief is, at best, difficult.
Kent Wills
<witc...@broomstick.com> wrote:
>
>"krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:4af165b8$0$5681$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>
>> "Uncle Vic" <add...@withheld.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9CB8D0C3...@216.196.97.131...
>>> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Still waiting for you to prove a god exists.
>>>>
>>>> Good. Keep waiting.
>>>
>>> LOL
>>
>>
>> Still waiting on PROOF that he doesn't exist.
>
>You would be - you are that stupid.
>
>When are you going to provide evidence leprechuans don't exist, you stupid
>fuck.
Are you claiming they don't? :)
Kadaitcha Man
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:20:07 +0100, Kadaitcha Man wrote
> (in article
> <abw4rp$m17$f...@alt.conspiracy.gray-haired-destitute.com.somaliland>):
>
>> pongespob, ye fool-born cursing hypocrite, methink thou art a general
>> offence, and every man should beat thee, ye indicted:
>>
>>> On Nov 1, 8:40 am, Kadaitcha Man <a...@no.email> wrote:
>>>> What's it like to be a fuckwit?
>>>
>>>
>>> You clearly have a better frame of reference as to the fuckwit
>>> condition than most.
>>
>> Problem solved...
>>
>> *plonk*
>>
>>
>
> Are you losing the plot there Kadaitcha Man?
Think about it, you fucktard know-nothing fuckplug. Of course, the
exhortation carries the invalid assumption that you have something to think
with.
--
The microscopic dilithium-propulsion stimulating warp drive is suspect.
You will need to supercharge the thermo-enhanced phero-anomaly roving
network using an isomorelay and a macrofluid. Also crimp the
axiduodynetic sampling positronic brain if necessary.
Lookout
wrote:
Faith - belief WITHOUT proof. There is no proof of a god. Period.
Kadaitcha Man
moaned:
[rearranged]
> There is no proof of a god. Period.
Well, no. That isn't true. There is no proof, no matter how definitive, that
you will accept.
> Faith - belief WITHOUT proof.
So, do you have faith that your partner isn't screwing someone with a much
bigger dick than that pathetic little worm-like thingy you are endowed with?
--
The fault can be caused by a suspect inertial repto-osmotic disrupting
message block, a suspect lateral photoparticle evacuating capacitor, or
even a logarithmic corefusion flocculating phasers. Did you rearrange
the spatial photonic inversion and circumvent the delta-integrity
stream? You may need a new quantum-mechanical transporter. Check the
circulation of the xenogrinder temporal transceiver. Also prevent the
deltaholographic mouldering overflow buffer if necessary.
chrisv
> Proving or disproving a belief is, at best, difficult.
As difficult as trimming the groups list?
Frickin idiots.
Barend Gofferedomme Dikzak
news:flk5f5dlh100ccgtp...@4ax.com:
Ditto, in the singular.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Lookout
wrote:
That's right...when you've lost the argument you attack my family. You
always end up back in 4th grade, don't you?
Uncle Vic
> Lookout, ye cockered whining mammet, thou disease of a friend, ye
> moaned:
>
>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:24:23 -0600, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:30:00 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Uncle Vic" <add...@withheld.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns9CB8D0C3...@216.196.97.131...
>>>>> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still waiting for you to prove a god exists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good. Keep waiting.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Still waiting on PROOF that he doesn't exist.
>>>
>>> You'll never see it.
>>> One can't prove that any god exists or doesn't exist. People
>>> either believe a god (or gods) does (do) exist or they believe a god
>>> (or gods) does not.
>>> Proving or disproving a belief is, at best, difficult.
>
> [rearranged]
>
>> There is no proof of a god. Period.
>
> Well, no. That isn't true. There is no proof, no matter how
> definitive, that you will accept.
Well, now, this indicates that you have some proof that only you will
accept. Hit me.
>
>> Faith - belief WITHOUT proof.
>
> So, do you have faith that your partner isn't screwing someone with a
> much bigger dick than that pathetic little worm-like thingy you are
> endowed with?
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FByERYetqI
Uncle Vic
>
> Seems to be a whole lotta plonking goin on round these here parts.
>
...OK Sheriff, we're gonna PLONK ya now!
Lookout
wrote:
>One fine day in alt.atheism, "pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Seems to be a whole lotta plonking goin on round these here parts.
>>
>
>...OK Sheriff, we're gonna PLONK ya now!
And we're gonna plonk you slow
Kadaitcha Man
call you knave, ye objected:
It's a fair question. Do you have faith that your partner isn't screwing
someone else?
You have been knocked down and completely fucked over because you now have
to either admit that "belief WITHOUT proof" is reasonable or you have to
admit that you are paranoid.
Sucks to be you, hey.
--
Ubuntu 9.10 x64 running Windows Server 2008 in VirtualBox
16GB 1333MHz DDR3 RAM, 10 * SATA2 3GB/s HDDs as dual 3TB RAID5
8-thread Intel Extreme i7-975 @ 3.80GHz, air-cooled Thermaltake
Intel BoneTrail Motherboard
Dual nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS 1GB
Honda Sabre 1100cc V-Twin
I can wank better than you can.
PS: Jensen Interceptor in air-conditioned storage.
Kadaitcha Man
> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
>
>> Lookout, ye cockered whining mammet, thou disease of a friend, ye
>> moaned:
>>
>>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:24:23 -0600, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:30:00 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Uncle Vic" <add...@withheld.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Xns9CB8D0C3...@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still waiting for you to prove a god exists.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good. Keep waiting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Still waiting on PROOF that he doesn't exist.
>>>>
>>>> You'll never see it.
>>>> One can't prove that any god exists or doesn't exist. People
>>>> either believe a god (or gods) does (do) exist or they believe a
>>>> god (or gods) does not.
>>>> Proving or disproving a belief is, at best, difficult.
>>
>> [rearranged]
>>
>>> There is no proof of a god. Period.
>>
>> Well, no. That isn't true. There is no proof, no matter how
>> definitive, that you will accept.
>
> Well, now, this indicates that you have some proof that only you will
> accept. Hit me<THWACK>
HTH
>>> Faith - belief WITHOUT proof.
>>
>> So, do you have faith that your partner isn't screwing someone with a
>> much bigger dick than that pathetic little worm-like thingy you are
>> endowed with?
>>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FByERYetqI
--
~BD~
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FByERYetqI
>
A better clip here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K8_jgiNqUc&NR=1
Kent Wills
wrote:
I didn't trim anything.
--
"Kent"
Kent Wills
wrote:
Exactly. It's a belief system.
In much the same way atheists believe all gods are fictional,
there are people who believe all but one are fictional. Some people
believe there are more than one. Hinduism leaps to mind.
Outside their pantheon, they will believe all gods are fictional.
--
"Kent"
Lookout
wrote:
Faith has nothing to do with it. I KNOW she isn't.
>
>You have been knocked down and completely fucked over because you now have
>to either admit that "belief WITHOUT proof" is reasonable or you have to
>admit that you are paranoid.
>
>Sucks to be you, hey.
You lost again.
Unless you can show up with a talking snake that is.
Ahahahahahahahahah
Lookout
wrote:
>Uncle Vic, ye fetid fellow, is thy name Mouldy?, ye yackety-yakked:
I don't watch youtube vids. Explain it yourself.
chrisv
<snigger>
Muttley
(in article <580shs$wuv$r...@alt.sports.unshapely-draggy-udders.com.kiribati>):
>>
>> Are you losing the plot there Kadaitcha Man?
>
> Think about it, you fucktard know-nothing fuckplug. Of course, the
> exhortation carries the invalid assumption that you have something to think
> with.
>
>
Back the fuck up, butt feeder.
Your useless, un-intelligent, and come across as a paper cone thats easily
stepped on. So why not, instead of prancing around here like some uninhibited
drag queen looking for attention, go fetch a really big, sharp knife, stand
it up straight, and practice your belly flop.
Come back after youve perfected it, bootlicker.
Muttley
(in article <afo56r$yjw$q...@alt.dumpster.heavyset-skank.co.bermuda>):
Do keep up, cunt.
You write like a 5 year old (not one of the ordinary ones, but the ones at
special school), and you are already of certain age, Mr Nice Gay.
Muttley
(in article
<mickdk$0vf$n...@alt.dumpster.soaking-heart-shaped-box.com.liberia>):
As the Tard's turn will be back after a short commercial announcement.
Embarrassing!!!
Lookout
wrote:
You don't know either of us and you "snigger"? A pathetic attempt at
an insult even for you.
And just because you couldn't trust your wife doesn't mean all wives
are like that.
Kadaitcha Man
treacherous, and full of guile, ye bawled:
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!
>> You have been knocked down and completely fucked over because you
>> now have to either admit that "belief WITHOUT proof" is reasonable
>> or you have to admit that you are paranoid.
>>
>> Sucks to be you, hey.
>
> You lost again.
> Unless you can show up with a talking snake that is.
> Ahahahahahahahahah
--
Kadaitcha Man
of my ladies opinion, where you will hang like an icicle on a Dutchman's
beard, ye enjoined:
Having trouble with attributions now, hmmm? Hardly surprising seeing as you
can't think.
Muttley
(in article
<3bslla$opi$r...@alt.movies.fugacious-knickerbocker-wearer.co.vanuatu>):
> Lookout, ye boil-brained so and so, thou are now sailed into the north
> of my ladies opinion, where you will hang like an icicle on a Dutchman's
> beard, ye enjoined:
>
>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:40:21 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email>
>> wrote:
>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FByERYetqI
>>
>> I don't watch youtube vids. Explain it yourself.
>
> Having trouble with attributions now, hmmm? Hardly surprising seeing as you
> can't think.
>
>
So, kadaitcha, is your butthurt gone and are you back to posting your cheesy
shite?
Muttley
(in article <of880q$6a8$0...@alt.flame.poke.your.walnut.net.bermuda>):
Grotesque.
Lookout
wrote:
>Lookout, ye boil-brained so and so, thou are now sailed into the north
>of my ladies opinion, where you will hang like an icicle on a Dutchman's
>beard, ye enjoined:
>
>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:40:21 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email>
>> wrote:
>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FByERYetqI
>>
>> I don't watch youtube vids. Explain it yourself.
>
>Having trouble with attributions now, hmmm? Hardly surprising seeing as you
>can't think.
Not at all. If you can't express then it's you who is lacking, not me.
Kadaitcha Man
sickness, ye lectured:
I didn't write it, you utterly fucked in the haed retard.