RAE +30%

[-=DirtBag©]

RAE systems seems on a roll today! +30%

[-=DirtBag©]

On 12/30/09 7:43 AM, -=DirtBag� wrote:
> RAE systems seems on a roll today! +30%

RAE currently $1.11 is good to about $1.80- 2.00 so there is still
considerable upside IMO.

[ausound]

-=DirtBag� <Di...@sonc.net> wrote in news:4b3b751a$0$1943
$742e...@news.sonic.net:

> RAE systems seems on a roll today! +30%
>

you want a roll?
2nd +200% day this week

IMSC.OB 10:59AM ET 0.30 0.24 400.00%

Implant Sciences Corporation engages in the development, manufacture, and
sale of sensors and systems for the security, safety, and defense
industries in the United States and internationally.

maybe now there will be some domestic sales of the quantum sniffer

[-=DirtBag©]

I guess whatever is driving them this morning is driving RAE as well?
HLDefence issues.. Explosive sniffers I suspect. I bet your HLDefence
list has a lot of green lately.

AVAV should do well too with there backpackable recon air device.

I woke up at 2am listening to world news and markets and heard some
rattling on about AVAV's little war toys.

Hope you got in on that rocketship IMSC.OB. Too thinly traded for any
attempt now.

[ausound]

-=DirtBag� <Di...@sonc.net> wrote in
news:4b3b91e3$0$2025$742e...@news.sonic.net:

I've owned this stock since 2005 (sigh)
when it was IMX
domestic sales VANISHED with the cheny/busch-league
in favor of coastguard rebuilding (certainly needed) but to the exclusion
of hand held sniffer units for the TSE ?? c'mon? Homeboy could never have
boarded a plane with that stuff on him with a cheap ass sniffer unit at
the boarding gate

[-=DirtBag©]

Well sniffers will most likely be at every airport boarding security
station NOW. People don't like flying and business video conferencing
ought to do well too as business people opt for the alternative. I can
iChat with my mother 1000 miles away like she was in the same room.
Video conferences are easy now. Only trouble is that security of video
conferencing.. a couple companies offer solutions VIACK (a private
company) being one who has governement contracts for secure 128bit
incripted =video=

[Robert Cohen]

On Dec 30, 1:39 pm, -=DirtBag© <D...@sonc.net> wrote:
> On 12/30/09 10:12 AM, ausound wrote:
>
>
>

> > -=DirtBag©<D...@sonc.net>  wrote in

> >news:4b3b91e3$0$2025$742e...@news.sonic.net:
>
> >> On 12/30/09 8:19 AM, ausound wrote:

> >>> -=DirtBag©<D...@sonc.net>   wrote in news:4b3b751a$0$1943
> >>> $742ec...@news.sonic.net:

Are there public companies (available on U.S. exchanges) that train
"police dogs?"

There supposedly is a shortage, according to a network tv news

And according to Brian, Katie or Diane, some innocents
are more scared than the people norm of the intrusive, fierce
mutts, so it's implied (to me) those (tres cher) machines
are preferred over trained canines

[-=DirtBag©]

Large dogs sniffing you are scary to some people.. I wouldn't like them
poking their big nose bewtween my legs or getting anywhere near Capt.
Jack. Personally I would prefer a machine to a dog, unless the dog did
a better job at detecting explosives of course.

[ausound]

-=DirtBag� <Di...@sonc.net> wrote in news:4b3bbeac$0$1998
$742e...@news.sonic.net:

> Large dogs sniffing you are scary to some people.. I wouldn't like them
> poking their big nose bewtween my legs or getting anywhere near Capt.
> Jack. Personally I would prefer a machine to a dog, unless the dog did
> a better job at detecting explosives of course.
>

back in the drinkin' daze of my youth... I've had a few large dogs sniffen
around between my legs and around Captain Jack..and sometimes she'd find
the explosives....

[skeeter]

"-=DirtBag�" <Di...@sonc.net> wrote in message
news:4b3bbeac$0$1998$742e...@news.sonic.net...

Capt. Jack??? LMFAO!