Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
lost WSW w/Louis Rukeyser transcript...REVEALED!
24 views
Skip to first unread message
Bill Reid
Oct 19, 2011, 10:17:56 AM10/19/11
to
Recently, the long-supressed transcript of the last
episode of "Wall Street Week With Louis Rukeyser",
where he lashed out at his bosses, was released:
LR: Good evening ladies and gentlemen, I'm Louis Rukeyser, this
is Wall Street Week, welcome back. Well, since we're now exactly
halfway through the trading year, let's take look at the results so
far of the model portfolios of our panel of experts, with the usual
caveat that even the best trader can occasionally strike out. Mary
Murphy, let's start with you. Your ten stocks are showing an
average loss of 87.5% with dividends reinvested...what do you
have to say for yourself?
MM: Well, what about my OTHER model portfolio, where I went
short on those same ten stocks?
LR: That's a little better Mary, that's only losing 20%. Keep in
mind, our random dart-throwing portfolio is up about 7%...
MM: But what about my other OTHER model portfolio, where I
went short on five of the stocks, and long on five of the stocks?
LR: Minus 38% Mary...
MM: But what about my other other OTHER model portfolio,
where I went short on three of the stocks, and long on seven?
LR: Minus 53%...
MM: But what about any of my other 100,250 portfolios, where
I went randomly long and short in various combinations on every
stock on the US exchanges? Surely one of those has a gain!
LR: None of them is in positive territory and show an average
loss of 14% and don't call me "Shirley"...we only let you play
because you're the closest thing to a woman in this ugly geekfest,
even though your face looks like the bottom of my 78-year-old foot.
Emilio Chavez, you're currently showing 12% loss, not too
bad for this group.
<Rukeyser puts on a large black mustache and a sombrero>
"EC": Si, senor Rukeyser, I no speak English too good, but
I get lucky trading the stocks, tam bien...
LR: Shlomo the Geologist, what do you have to say about
your results of minus 97%? Wouldn't it have just been quicker
to burn your money?
<Rukeyser takes off mustache and sombrero and puts on pith helmet>
"STG": My good man, you of all people should know that I
am very busy digging up rocks or whatever geologists do, so
I didn't have time to perform any due diligence on my portfolio.
What about Hymie the Crypto-Zoologist?
<Rukeyser keeps pith helmet but grabs butterfly net>
"HTC": Sirrah, I'm not responsible for my 250% loss, I had a
Yeti throw darts at the stock tables...
<stagehand hands message to "Hymie the Crypto-Zoologist",
who takes off pith helmet and throws butterfly net down in anger>
LR: Ladies and gentlemen, I've just been informed that the
fascists at Maryland Public Television have cancelled this
show for no good reason. This show has had the highest
ratings among Geologists, Crypto-Zoologists, Molecular
Biological-type guys, and Mexicans of any investing show on
public television, so I will be filing a 200,000 page lawsuit against
all sane members of the entire human race for this travesty.
Good night, and I won't see you next week, except in your
nightmares.
---
William Ernest Reid (the sad thing is always, the inverse
of the good die young is soooooo true)
episode of "Wall Street Week With Louis Rukeyser",
where he lashed out at his bosses, was released:
LR: Good evening ladies and gentlemen, I'm Louis Rukeyser, this
is Wall Street Week, welcome back. Well, since we're now exactly
halfway through the trading year, let's take look at the results so
far of the model portfolios of our panel of experts, with the usual
caveat that even the best trader can occasionally strike out. Mary
Murphy, let's start with you. Your ten stocks are showing an
average loss of 87.5% with dividends reinvested...what do you
have to say for yourself?
MM: Well, what about my OTHER model portfolio, where I went
short on those same ten stocks?
LR: That's a little better Mary, that's only losing 20%. Keep in
mind, our random dart-throwing portfolio is up about 7%...
MM: But what about my other OTHER model portfolio, where I
went short on five of the stocks, and long on five of the stocks?
LR: Minus 38% Mary...
MM: But what about my other other OTHER model portfolio,
where I went short on three of the stocks, and long on seven?
LR: Minus 53%...
MM: But what about any of my other 100,250 portfolios, where
I went randomly long and short in various combinations on every
stock on the US exchanges? Surely one of those has a gain!
LR: None of them is in positive territory and show an average
loss of 14% and don't call me "Shirley"...we only let you play
because you're the closest thing to a woman in this ugly geekfest,
even though your face looks like the bottom of my 78-year-old foot.
Emilio Chavez, you're currently showing 12% loss, not too
bad for this group.
<Rukeyser puts on a large black mustache and a sombrero>
"EC": Si, senor Rukeyser, I no speak English too good, but
I get lucky trading the stocks, tam bien...
LR: Shlomo the Geologist, what do you have to say about
your results of minus 97%? Wouldn't it have just been quicker
to burn your money?
<Rukeyser takes off mustache and sombrero and puts on pith helmet>
"STG": My good man, you of all people should know that I
am very busy digging up rocks or whatever geologists do, so
I didn't have time to perform any due diligence on my portfolio.
What about Hymie the Crypto-Zoologist?
<Rukeyser keeps pith helmet but grabs butterfly net>
"HTC": Sirrah, I'm not responsible for my 250% loss, I had a
Yeti throw darts at the stock tables...
<stagehand hands message to "Hymie the Crypto-Zoologist",
who takes off pith helmet and throws butterfly net down in anger>
LR: Ladies and gentlemen, I've just been informed that the
fascists at Maryland Public Television have cancelled this
show for no good reason. This show has had the highest
ratings among Geologists, Crypto-Zoologists, Molecular
Biological-type guys, and Mexicans of any investing show on
public television, so I will be filing a 200,000 page lawsuit against
all sane members of the entire human race for this travesty.
Good night, and I won't see you next week, except in your
nightmares.
---
William Ernest Reid (the sad thing is always, the inverse
of the good die young is soooooo true)
Lubow
Oct 22, 2011, 10:29:25 PM10/22/11
to
"Bill Reid" <horme...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:af3db79d-b35e-4b34...@a25g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> Recently, the long-supressed transcript of the last
> episode of "Wall Street Week With Louis Rukeyser",
> where he lashed out at his bosses, was released:
Speaking of releasing, Bill, how come you will not release the financial
> episode of "Wall Street Week With Louis Rukeyser",
> where he lashed out at his bosses, was released:
statement you had signed under penalty of perjury to Judge Emerson?
You told us that you look for option spread "opportunities."
How in hell can you look for any opportunities when you swore to the judge
you are practically broke? All you need to do is post your financial
statement on the net somewhere to prove you are the business and investment
success you purport to be.
I am beginning to believe you are a phony, Bill.
You claim to know more than the lawyers but my investigation shows you never
won a case in your life. In fact, the only case with your name on it shows
you as the loser.
You claim to have $40,000 in cash hanging around but at the same time you
swore to a judge that you are nearly broke.
Your actions over the last month seem to confirm your penury. I had sent
you via certified mail a package that is still lying in the post office.
Certainly a investment "success" story like Bill Reid should at least have
the $4 for a round trip bus fare to the post office to pick up your
certified mail.
So, Bill, is it the money that's preventing you from retrieving your
certified mail?
Bill Reid
Oct 24, 2011, 9:54:53 AM10/24/11
to
On Oct 22, 7:29 pm, "Lubow" <dynamitem...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Bill Reid" <hormelf...@gmail.com> wrote in message
a Rukeyser fan...he mad now!
> Speaking of releasing, Bill, how come you will not release the financial
> statement you had signed under penalty of perjury to Judge Emerson?
>
If this guy isn't the biggest stalker on the Internet, I don't
know who is, always trying to get my financial information...I'm
still waiting for some definitive financial information to
verify your claim under penalty of perjury that you are on a
"limited income" and could not afford to defend yourself in
lawsuit, even though as I pointed out in my response you
claimed to have made specific large sums of money trading in the
two years prior to making that statement, in addition to
running a "41 person" company on your resume (all crammed
into an 1100 sq.ft. residence, mi dios!).
> You told us that you look for option spread "opportunities."
>
> How in hell can you look for any opportunities when you swore to the judge
> you are practically broke?
I never swore any such thing...
> All you need to do is post your financial
> statement on the net somewhere to prove you are the business and investment
> success you purport to be.
>
I think I revealed here once that I traded options for something like
eight solid months and did nothing but lose virtually ALL of the
money
I "invested" (in addition to revealing that I lost about 25% of my
net worth in three months in stocks), and yet, you STILL want MORE
financial information from me...would you be happy if I just gave
you all my bank account numbers and passwords?
> I am beginning to believe you are a phony, Bill.
>
No, you don't, you actually don't believe any of the
LIES you tell...you're a pathological liar, but do not
fit the legal and medical definition of "crazy", in
that you KNOW you live in an 1100 sq.ft. crap shack,
not the 10,000 sq.ft. mansion like you claimed, etc.,
etc., etc., etc.,...
> You claim to know more than the lawyers but my investigation shows you never
> won a case in your life. In fact, the only case with your name on it shows
> you as the loser.
>
Investigate harder, Columbo...
> You claim to have $40,000 in cash hanging around but at the same time you
> swore to a judge that you are nearly broke.
>
Again, I never swore to any judge that I was broke, this is
just another of your hundreds of lies...if you're so interested
in this topic, why don't you post the statement in question,
since you claimed you bribed a court clerk $28 to get it (it's
confidential information, but that never stopped a dedicated
identity thief such as yourself)?
> Your actions over the last month seem to confirm your penury. I had sent
> you via certified mail a package that is still lying in the post office.
> Certainly a investment "success" story like Bill Reid should at least have
> the $4 for a round trip bus fare to the post office to pick up your
> certified mail.
>
Maybe you misaddressed this vital piece of communication, who knows?
> So, Bill, is it the money that's preventing you from retrieving your
> certified mail?
The real question is, why would anybody want to communicate with a
loon like you, except to laugh at you? I've read your previous
communications,
and they were just incomprehensible rantings consisting of hundreds of
pages
of non-sequiturs (just like your posts!). If you have such an urgent
message to relay that you are spending money on certified mail,
please feel free to post the contents here so I am sure to see it,
and so we can all laugh at its retardedness...
---
William Ernest Reid ("Dumb Mikey Lubow" Tenenbaum is pretty spry
with his looney mailings for a guy who defaulted on defending a
lawsuit against him because, as he swore under penalty of perjury,
he was getting "cancer treatments")
> "Bill Reid" <hormelf...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:af3db79d-b35e-4b34...@a25g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Recently, the long-supressed transcript of the last
> > episode of "Wall Street Week With Louis Rukeyser",
> > where he lashed out at his bosses, was released:
>
Uh-oh, looks like crazy old "Dumb Mikey Lubow" Tenenbaum is
> news:af3db79d-b35e-4b34...@a25g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Recently, the long-supressed transcript of the last
> > episode of "Wall Street Week With Louis Rukeyser",
> > where he lashed out at his bosses, was released:
>
a Rukeyser fan...he mad now!
> Speaking of releasing, Bill, how come you will not release the financial
> statement you had signed under penalty of perjury to Judge Emerson?
>
know who is, always trying to get my financial information...I'm
still waiting for some definitive financial information to
verify your claim under penalty of perjury that you are on a
"limited income" and could not afford to defend yourself in
lawsuit, even though as I pointed out in my response you
claimed to have made specific large sums of money trading in the
two years prior to making that statement, in addition to
running a "41 person" company on your resume (all crammed
into an 1100 sq.ft. residence, mi dios!).
> You told us that you look for option spread "opportunities."
>
> How in hell can you look for any opportunities when you swore to the judge
> you are practically broke?
> All you need to do is post your financial
> statement on the net somewhere to prove you are the business and investment
> success you purport to be.
>
eight solid months and did nothing but lose virtually ALL of the
money
I "invested" (in addition to revealing that I lost about 25% of my
net worth in three months in stocks), and yet, you STILL want MORE
financial information from me...would you be happy if I just gave
you all my bank account numbers and passwords?
> I am beginning to believe you are a phony, Bill.
>
LIES you tell...you're a pathological liar, but do not
fit the legal and medical definition of "crazy", in
that you KNOW you live in an 1100 sq.ft. crap shack,
not the 10,000 sq.ft. mansion like you claimed, etc.,
etc., etc., etc.,...
> You claim to know more than the lawyers but my investigation shows you never
> won a case in your life. In fact, the only case with your name on it shows
> you as the loser.
>
> You claim to have $40,000 in cash hanging around but at the same time you
> swore to a judge that you are nearly broke.
>
just another of your hundreds of lies...if you're so interested
in this topic, why don't you post the statement in question,
since you claimed you bribed a court clerk $28 to get it (it's
confidential information, but that never stopped a dedicated
identity thief such as yourself)?
> Your actions over the last month seem to confirm your penury. I had sent
> you via certified mail a package that is still lying in the post office.
> Certainly a investment "success" story like Bill Reid should at least have
> the $4 for a round trip bus fare to the post office to pick up your
> certified mail.
>
> So, Bill, is it the money that's preventing you from retrieving your
> certified mail?
loon like you, except to laugh at you? I've read your previous
communications,
and they were just incomprehensible rantings consisting of hundreds of
pages
of non-sequiturs (just like your posts!). If you have such an urgent
message to relay that you are spending money on certified mail,
please feel free to post the contents here so I am sure to see it,
and so we can all laugh at its retardedness...
---
William Ernest Reid ("Dumb Mikey Lubow" Tenenbaum is pretty spry
with his looney mailings for a guy who defaulted on defending a
lawsuit against him because, as he swore under penalty of perjury,
he was getting "cancer treatments")
Lubow
Oct 24, 2011, 4:48:28 PM10/24/11
to
news:3f1b6b3c-eaba-438c...@er6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
Billy, billy! You took OVER $350 ($700 if you did not pay for your
ridiculous reconsideration motion) from the California taxpayers just for
court fees. I have no idea how much more in public assistance you have
taken. Maybe you can tell us.
To put it another way, why didn't you include the FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
about which you were bragging, in your financial statement?
One more time... IS HANDING OVER $350 TO $700 (OR MORE) TO BILL REID FOR
RIDICULOUS, LOSING LAWSUITS A GOOD USE OF THE TAXPAYERS' MONEY?
On Oct 22, 7:29 pm, "Lubow" <dynamitem...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Bill Reid" <hormelf...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:af3db79d-b35e-4b34...@a25g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Recently, the long-supressed transcript of the last
> > episode of "Wall Street Week With Louis Rukeyser",
> > where he lashed out at his bosses, was released:
>
Uh-oh, looks like crazy old "Dumb Mikey Lubow" Tenenbaum is
a Rukeyser fan...he mad now!
> Speaking of releasing, Bill, how come you will not release the financial
> statement you had signed under penalty of perjury to Judge Emerson?
>
If this guy isn't the biggest stalker on the Internet, I don't
know who is, always trying to get my financial information...
============
> "Bill Reid" <hormelf...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:af3db79d-b35e-4b34...@a25g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Recently, the long-supressed transcript of the last
> > episode of "Wall Street Week With Louis Rukeyser",
> > where he lashed out at his bosses, was released:
>
Uh-oh, looks like crazy old "Dumb Mikey Lubow" Tenenbaum is
a Rukeyser fan...he mad now!
> Speaking of releasing, Bill, how come you will not release the financial
> statement you had signed under penalty of perjury to Judge Emerson?
>
If this guy isn't the biggest stalker on the Internet, I don't
know who is, always trying to get my financial information...
Billy, billy! You took OVER $350 ($700 if you did not pay for your
ridiculous reconsideration motion) from the California taxpayers just for
court fees. I have no idea how much more in public assistance you have
taken. Maybe you can tell us.
To put it another way, why didn't you include the FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
about which you were bragging, in your financial statement?
One more time... IS HANDING OVER $350 TO $700 (OR MORE) TO BILL REID FOR
RIDICULOUS, LOSING LAWSUITS A GOOD USE OF THE TAXPAYERS' MONEY?
RayLopez99
Oct 25, 2011, 2:12:48 AM10/25/11
to
On Oct 25, 4:48 am, "Lubow" <dynamitem...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> ============
>
> Billy, billy! You took OVER $350 ($700 if you did not pay for your
> ridiculous reconsideration motion) from the California taxpayers just for
> court fees. I have no idea how much more in public assistance you have
> taken. Maybe you can tell us.
>
> To put it another way, why didn't you include the FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
> about which you were bragging, in your financial statement?
>
> One more time... IS HANDING OVER $350 TO $700 (OR MORE) TO BILL REID FOR
> RIDICULOUS, LOSING LAWSUITS A GOOD USE OF THE TAXPAYERS' MONEY?
Why do you insist on debating this bozo on the net? You're going to
> ============
>
> Billy, billy! You took OVER $350 ($700 if you did not pay for your
> ridiculous reconsideration motion) from the California taxpayers just for
> court fees. I have no idea how much more in public assistance you have
> taken. Maybe you can tell us.
>
> To put it another way, why didn't you include the FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
> about which you were bragging, in your financial statement?
>
> One more time... IS HANDING OVER $350 TO $700 (OR MORE) TO BILL REID FOR
> RIDICULOUS, LOSING LAWSUITS A GOOD USE OF THE TAXPAYERS' MONEY?
sink to his wino level.
Let the hobo be.
RL
Lubow
Oct 25, 2011, 3:05:40 AM10/25/11
to
"RayLopez99" <raylo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b435017b-d142-4d55...@p1g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
You're right, Ray.
0 new messages