Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Analysts: Ford Equity, S&P, The Street
7 views
Skip to first unread message
DanielleOM
May 23, 2012, 6:11:54 AM5/23/12
to
I find I often look at the subject line analyst reports but I find they
are not always in agreement. Is there one you guys find more reliable
than the others? Has anyone really determined if there is a basic
difference in method?
Thanks
Danielle
Lubow
May 23, 2012, 7:38:17 AM5/23/12
to
"DanielleOM" <danie...@reply.to.group.com> wrote in message
news:jpid5c$d3j$1...@dont-email.me...
Go to the library and open up the latest S&P Stock Guide. Look for stocks
that are rated A- or better. Then go across the page and look at the
capitalization. Look at the company's cash position, assets, liabilities,
long term debt and annual earnings per share. Then use the following flow
chart:
Are assets > long term debt?
No: go on to the next company
Yes:
Is cash > long term debt X .75 ?
No: go on to the next company
Yes:
Do you see a progression of increasing earnings per share (it's OK if
earnings went down just one year over the past five years)?
No: Go on to the next company
Yes:
Is the company in an industry you understand?
No: Do further research to see if you can understand the industry
Yes:
Consider buying
If cash > long term debt, definitely buy.
DanielleOM
May 23, 2012, 8:31:02 AM5/23/12
to
Danielle
Frank Kafka
May 23, 2012, 8:37:19 AM5/23/12
to
On Wed, 23 May 2012 07:38:17 -0400, "Lubow" <dynami...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"DanielleOM" <danie...@reply.to.group.com> wrote in message
>news:jpid5c$d3j$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
>> I find I often look at the subject line analyst reports but I find they
>> are not always in agreement. Is there one you guys find more reliable
>> than the others? Has anyone really determined if there is a basic
>> difference in method?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Danielle
>
>I'm going to tell you how to make money in stocks you never considered.
>
>Go to the library and open up the latest S&P Stock Guide. Look for stocks
>that are rated A- or better. Then go across the page and look at the
>capitalization. Look at the company's cash position, assets, liabilities,
>long term debt and annual earnings per share. Then use the following flow
>chart:
>
>Are assets > long term debt?
>
You don't know what you're talking about.
Assets = Liabilities + Equity
Therefore the answer to your question is ALWAYS YES and can NEVER be
NO.
You're full of it and an incompent lier.
Please, your highness, prove to us all how Assets < L/t debt.
wrote:
>
>"DanielleOM" <danie...@reply.to.group.com> wrote in message
>news:jpid5c$d3j$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
>> I find I often look at the subject line analyst reports but I find they
>> are not always in agreement. Is there one you guys find more reliable
>> than the others? Has anyone really determined if there is a basic
>> difference in method?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Danielle
>
>I'm going to tell you how to make money in stocks you never considered.
>
>Go to the library and open up the latest S&P Stock Guide. Look for stocks
>that are rated A- or better. Then go across the page and look at the
>capitalization. Look at the company's cash position, assets, liabilities,
>long term debt and annual earnings per share. Then use the following flow
>chart:
>
>Are assets > long term debt?
>
Assets = Liabilities + Equity
Therefore the answer to your question is ALWAYS YES and can NEVER be
NO.
You're full of it and an incompent lier.
Please, your highness, prove to us all how Assets < L/t debt.
Lubow
May 23, 2012, 9:07:23 AM5/23/12
to
news:jpila6$mm3$1...@dont-email.me...
combination of the Geraldine Weiss method of looking at A- or better
companies while looking at their dividends and stuff I learned from getting
my PhD from the University of Hardknox.
That reminds me... look at the dividend progression and see if the dividends
have been increased at least once during the last five years. That data
would be found in an S&P stock report, not in the Stock Guide.
>
> Is this the huge Benjamin and Graham book summarized in 1/2 dozen steps?
>
> Danielle
>
I doubt if Ben cared what S&P's ratings were. It's a method that is a
> Is this the huge Benjamin and Graham book summarized in 1/2 dozen steps?
>
> Danielle
>
combination of the Geraldine Weiss method of looking at A- or better
companies while looking at their dividends and stuff I learned from getting
my PhD from the University of Hardknox.
That reminds me... look at the dividend progression and see if the dividends
have been increased at least once during the last five years. That data
would be found in an S&P stock report, not in the Stock Guide.
Frank Kafka
May 24, 2012, 8:14:01 PM5/24/12
to
Frank Kafka
May 24, 2012, 8:16:05 PM5/24/12
to
0 new messages