Don <
dwz...@telus.net> writes:
> On Jan 4, 11:03 am, David S Meyers CFP <
m...@meyersmoney.com> wrote:
>> The article reiterates a point that I've made many times - that
>> just about anyone may call himself a "financial adviser" (which
> Does a financial advisor who selects his own portfolio have a fool for
> a client?
I'm not sure if you're kidding here or not. As I said, there
is no real unambiguous definition of "financial adviser". There
is a clear, regulated definition for "registered investment adviser"
(or "RIA") and representatives who work for/as an RIA, called
"investment adviser representatives". So I'm wary of any
discussion centered around the term "financial adviser".
That said, there's a certain expression about "eating one's
own cooking". By no means is it reasonable to expect that
the portfolio an adviser puts together for himself should be
the same as a portfolio he puts together for any particular
client, any more than any two clients should have the same
portfolios. If an adviser can be trusted to put together
a portfolio for his clients, I should hope that he's capable
of putting together a portfolio for himself.
As in many things, it often helps to have a third party
do a sanity check. But this is not generally like the
proverbial attorney who has a fool for a client, or like
a surgeon trying to operate on himself.