Futility of Weight Loss as long-term prevention / treatment for Cellosis

[_]

- - -

Cellosis, new superior clarifying terminology
for a High Glucose Condition caused by diet,
and/or low exercise, and/or old age, that often
includes insulin resistance and always includes
continued endogenous production of insulin
that decreases over time, but doesn't stop, ...

... and can increase, and can go into remission
with gastric bypass surgery or very low calorie
diets, though the sustainability of that over the
long-term is dubious, as discussed below.

The old name for this is type 2 diabetes, though
it's confusingly called diabetes without clarifier
all-too-often, a problem that plagues all 7 of
the Disparate High Glucose Conditions.
https://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm#cellosis
https://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm

- - -

- - -
March 24 2015

The Weight of the Evidence

97 percent of dieters regain everything they
lost and then some within three years
https://slate.com/technology/2015/03/diets-do-not-work-the-thin-evidence-that-losing-weight-makes-you-healthier.html
- - -

... Studies from the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention repeatedly find the lowest mortality
rates among people whose body mass index is
25.1 to slightly over 30 (categories typically char-
acterized as overweight to mildly obese).

... The national obsession with weight got a boost
in 1942, when the Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company crunched age, weight, and mortality
numbers from policy holders to create “desirable”
height and weight charts.

For the first time, people (and their doctors) could
compare themselves to a standardized notion of
what they “should” weigh.

And compare they did, in language that shifted
from words like chubby and plump to the more
clinical-sounding adipose, overweight, and obese.

The word overweight, for example, suggests you’re
over the “right” weight. The word obese, from the
Latin obesus, or “having eaten until fat,” conveys
both a clinical and a moral judgment. ...

- - -
December 18 2020

UVA researcher evaluates a new approach
to managing Cellosis
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201218/UVA-researcher-evaluates-a-new-approach-to-managing-type-2-diabetes.aspx
- - -

A researcher at the University of Virginia School of
Medicine is testing what he calls a "radically different"
approach to managing Cellosis for those who can't
or don't want to lose weight.

- - -
Insert - Per the article above, 97% of people fail
to lose weight and keep it off for more than 3 years,
so recommending weight loss to prevent or treat
Cellosis has a 97% long-term failure rate.
End Insert
- - -

... Cox's approach relies on continuous glucose moni-
toring to help people understand how their food choices
affect their blood sugar.

- - -
Insert - This method is being studied, but I have doubts
that this approach will have a significant percentage of
success over the long-term, simply due to the effort re-
quired by individuals to monitor their glucose levels &
adjust their behavior to respond to what they learn.
End Insert
- - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[AntiPro&T1.2DM]

_ wrote:

> The only name for this is type 2 diabetes

Use the correct DM names to communicate with the World properly.
--
APT1.2DM = SAID+T5 = SAID+(MARD/25) = T1.2, per Lancet 5 DM Groups.
Insulinitis = Insulitis: β-cell destruction by lymphocytes, not a disease name.
Islit, cellosis and diminosis are nonsense words used by 1 crazy person on Earth.

[_]

- - -

Follow-up: The diabetics word & the diabetes
word used without clarifier caused needless
confusion & misleading in the 2nd article that
I linked to in the previous post, documented
below in the appropriate place within the pre-
vious post:

On Friday, December 18, 2020 at 8:40:24 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:

.> - - -
.>
.> Cellosis, new superior clarifying terminology
.> for a High Glucose Condition caused by diet,
.> and/or low exercise, and/or old age, that often
.> includes insulin resistance and always includes
.> continued endogenous production of insulin
.> that decreases over time, but doesn't stop, ...
.>
.> ... and can increase, and can go into remission
.> with gastric bypass surgery or very low calorie
.> diets, though the sustainability of that over the
.> long-term is dubious, as discussed below.
.>
.> The old name for this is type 2 diabetes, though
.> it's confusingly called diabetes without clarifier
.> all-too-often, a problem that plagues all 7 of
.> the Disparate High Glucose Conditions.
.> https://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm#cellosis
.> https://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm
.>
.> - - -
.>
.> - - -
.> March 24 2015
.>
.> The Weight of the Evidence
.>
.> 97 percent of dieters regain everything they
.> lost and then some within three years
.> https://slate.com/technology/2015/03/diets-do-not-work-the-thin-evidence-that-losing-weight-makes-you-healthier.html
.> - - -
.>
.> ... Studies from the Centers for Disease Control
.> and Prevention repeatedly find the lowest mortality
.> rates among people whose body mass index is
.> 25.1 to slightly over 30 (categories typically char-
.> acterized as overweight to mildly obese).
.>
.> ... The national obsession with weight got a boost
.> in 1942, when the Metropolitan Life Insurance
.> Company crunched age, weight, and mortality
.> numbers from policy holders to create “desirable”
.> height and weight charts.
.>
.> For the first time, people (and their doctors) could
.> compare themselves to a standardized notion of
.> what they “should” weigh.
.>
.> And compare they did, in language that shifted
.> from words like chubby and plump to the more
.> clinical-sounding adipose, overweight, and obese.
.>
.> The word overweight, for example, suggests you’re
.> over the “right” weight. The word obese, from the
.> Latin obesus, or “having eaten until fat,” conveys
.> both a clinical and a moral judgment. ...
.>
.> - - -
.> December 18 2020
.>
.> UVA researcher evaluates a new approach
.> to managing Cellosis
.> https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201218/UVA-researcher-evaluates-a-new-approach-to-managing-type-2-diabetes.aspx
.> - - -

Of the 8 mentions of diabetes in this article
and the 1 mention of diabetics in this article,
they used the 'type 2' clarifier 3 times. Of the
6 times they used no clarifier, here's each
excerpt explaining why they should *not*
have used those words without clarifier:

1) "You can even put diabetes in remission."
NO NO NO, why in the world did they leave
off the critical 'type 2' clarifier here? The art-
icle used the 'type 2' clarifier in its 1st two
times it was solely talking about 'type 2',
then the writer neglected to use 'type 2' & ...

... mislead us by saying something that can
only be true for 'type 2', *NOT* for any other
type of the 7 Disparate High Glucose Condi-
tions.

2) "A different take on diabetes management"
The article is talking about 'type 2' in this sec-
tion, and neglectfully, mislead readers by leav-
ing the 'type 2' clarifier off.

3) "New insulin molecule will make blood sugar
regulation easier and safer for diabetics", links
to an article that's solely about Islit (abbrevia-
tion for the new superior clarifying name of
Insulinitis, near-total to total loss of endogen-
ous insulin) & LaIslit (Latent Autoimmune Islit).

The author neglectfully mislead readers as
the article would have been of great interest
to Islit/LaIslit individuals & their friends & fam-
ily but they/we had no way of knowing that we
were being referred to as the diabetics word
could refer to all, some, or only one of the 7 ...

... Disparate High Glucose Conditions, and
in this case was only referring to Islit/LaIslit.

4) "Researchers urge policymakers to prioritize
people with diabetes for COVID-19 vaccination"
This is the only place in this entire article when
the diabetes word applied to all 7 of the Disparate
High Glucose Conditions.

5) "Findings about primary cilia may be relevant
for transplantation therapies in diabetes" Solely
referring to Islit/LaIslit.

6) "About the diabetes clinical trial" No, within the
text that follows, the writer states the clinical trial
is solely about Cellosis (type 2), *not* any of the
6 non-Cellosis Disparate High Glucose Conditions.

.>
.> A researcher at the University of Virginia School of
.> Medicine is testing what he calls a "radically different"
.> approach to managing Cellosis for those who can't
.> or don't want to lose weight.
.>
.> - - -
.> Insert - Per the article above, 97% of people fail
.> to lose weight and keep it off for more than 3 years,
.> so recommending weight loss to prevent or treat
.> Cellosis has a 97% long-term failure rate.
.> End Insert
.> - - -
.>
.> ... Cox's approach relies on continuous glucose moni-
.> toring to help people understand how their food choices
.> affect their blood sugar.
.>
.> - - -
.> Insert - This method is being studied, but I have doubts
.> that this approach will have a significant percentage of
.> success over the long-term, simply due to the effort re-
.> quired by individuals to monitor their glucose levels &
.> adjust their behavior to respond to what they learn.
.> End Insert
.> - - -
.>
.> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[Pro-Humanist FREELOVER]

_ wrote:

> they should *not* have used those words without clarifier

Nobody else thinks it is a problem. Majority rules in a democracy.

1 in 7.7 billion has no say. U talking to an empty church.