Daniel Darkes' Islit Mystery

[Pro-Humanist FREELOVER]

- - -

Islit (abbreviation for proposed new term
Insulinitis, the near-total to total loss
of endogenous insulin); for details on
Islit and all of the other proposed new
terms used in this post, refer to the
Diabetes Bubble / Diabetes Bubble Burst
link in my sig at the end of this post.

Summary of Daniel Darkes' Islit mystery:

Daniel Darkes was diagnosed (or was mis-
diagnosed) with the condition sometimes
called "type 1 diabetes" in February, 2011,
6 years ago, and stopped using insulin in
December, 2016.

Was that condition misdiagnosed? Did he
actually have a non-Islit condition, such
as

- Cellosis (a condition which somewhere
in the neighborhood of 95% of those with
any High Glucose Condition have, contin-
ued insulin production, initially higher,
but over time reduced, causing glucose
levels to have to be treated with diet,
exercise, oral meds (in many), and/or
injected meds (in a minority), typically
caused by insulin resistance

- Diminosis (continued but reduced insulin
production due to a monogenetic cause)

- One of the Other High Glucose Conditions
(24 specific types, typically rare, apart
from Islit, Cellosis, and Diminosis)

Did he actually have a unique previously
undiscovered specific type of Islit which
was not caused by Insulitis?

Did he actually have the condition he was
diagnosed as having, and stopped that con-
dition as a result of being

o an ultra marathon runner

-or-

o due to some other cause which medical
researchers still haven't figured out

-or-

o have medical researchers arrived at
the conclusion that Daniel had an
inexplicable 'cure' of his correctly
diagnosed condition that has never
transpired before?

Link to original "Miracle Dan?" thread:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.health.diabetes/mN7GPmM__G8
and link to another post interviewing
Daniel Darkes regarding his stopping
insulin dosages:
https://asweetlife.org/has-a-british-man-really-been-cured-of-type-1-diabetes

- - -

Well, today marks the end of the 8th next
week mentioned in the following quote at
the end of the following article which
appeared on March 15, 2017:
http://www.diabetes.co.uk/news/2017/mar/british-man-with-type-1-diabetes-to-receive-tests-after-coming-off-insulin-95040046.html

"The findings from Mr Darkes' test results
set to be published next week and it is
hoped they will help find future treatments
for the autoimmune condition."

Clarification: Only Insulitis Islit is an
autoimmune caused High Glucose Condition;
although it's the specific type of Islit
that most have, some have one of the much
less frequent other specific types (fully
documented at the Diabetes Bubble / Diabetes
Bubble Burst article linked to in my sig).

o first "next week" ended March 25th
o next "next week" ended April 1st
o 3rd "next week" ended April 8th
o 4th "next week" ended April 15th

o 5th "next week" ended April 22nd
o 6th "next week" ended April 29th
o 7th "next week" ended May 6th
o 8th "next week" ends today, May 13th

Almost two full months, and still no
published results. Mysterious. Here's
what some have said in responses to
the March 15, 2017 post above:

Rayol, a month ago: "I've been looking
for some news everyday!! Please.. What
happened?!! What did the results inform?!"

Rayol, a month ago: "Why have no results
been published from his tests ? It quoted
"next week" which is a month ago now and
nothing reported!! WHERE ARE THE RESULTS??!!!
C'MON!! PUBLISH IT. GIVE US SOME INFORMATION"

nick, a month ago: "Why have no results been
published from his tests ? It quoted "next
week" which is a month ago now and nothing
reported"

Tiago, a month ago: "agree with nick. some-
thing so important as this should be con-
stantly monitored and updated."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - -
Pro-Humanist FREELOVER, Insulitis Islit
since age 5 (March, 1961), seeking to
promote replacing all of the ancient
confusing and misleading diabetes and
diabetic words and phrases with new
clarifying nonconfusing nonmisleading
words and phrases first proposed in
2010:

C.ure I.nsulinitis A.ssociation
http://prohuman.net/cureinsulinitisassociation.htm

Diabetes Bubble / Diabetes Bubble Burst
http://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm

Glucose Anomalies Research regarding
Potential Cures / Improvements in Treatments
http://prohuman.net/glucoseanomaliesresearch.htm
- - -

[AntiPro-T1]

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER wrote:

> Islit

You got me laughing! I can't help but chuckle reading your posts!

Your terminology is a foreign language and fails.

You have not found common ground to communicate with other people.

And your creativity goes backward, negative, in a destructive manner.
--
APT1
Educating Pro on proper DM terminology!

[Pro-Humanist FREELOVER]

On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 4:14:41 PM UTC-5,
AntiPro-T1 wrote:

> [another anti-new terms stance]

So, regarding Daniel Darkes and the type 1
diabetes phrase:

1) Do you think he was correctly diagnosed
with that condition in February, 2011,
or that he may have been misdiagnosed?

2) Any ideas on why 'next week' hasn't
occurred in 8 'next weeks'?

Those of us extremely curious about what
actually happened in Daniel Darkes' ability
to stop dosing insulin in December, 2016, I
suppose we'll have to await the 'next week'
publication of the test results which the
media (and/or some source entity) misre-
ported and has thus far not followed up on
in the 8 'next weeks" as of May 13th (today).

- - -

[AntiPro-T1]

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER wrote:

> 1) Do you think he was correctly diagnosed
> with that condition in February, 2011,
> or that he may have been misdiagnosed?

Yes.

> 2) Any ideas on why 'next week' hasn't
> occurred in 8 'next weeks'?

No. This is your problem, not mine.

I feel bad for your Mother on Mother's Day.

[sjt....@googlemail.com]

Has anyone considered there is a cure for diabetes and cancer but the pharmaceutical and their masters do not want this revealed due to the massive loss they would make due to reduction in lifelong treatment . see how many cancer researchers have been found dead .

if this is the case , the news article is designed to limit the damage .if he has stumbled on a cure , they could have offered him a vast amount of money and got him to sign a gagging order .

this makes the most sense to me

[R. Daneel Olivaw]

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:04:00 -0700 (PDT), sjt....@googlemail.com
wrote:

>this makes the most sense to me

It doesn't to me; the discoverer(s) would be Lister, Salk, etc., a
thousand times over.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[AntiPro&T1DM]

sjt....@googlemail.com wrote:

> see how many cancer researchers have been found dead

This is off topic here in MHD. I recommend you commission our Cellosified
Expert, Pro, to research and report back to your usual NG on cancer.

Pro is your Man to sort this out! Go Pro! (Not the camera.)
--
APT1DM
Exposing Pro's flaws and educating Pro on proper DM terminology!
Pro is the ONLY 1 Confused in ~8 Billion people on Earth w/Diabetes terminology.
Pro's Cheat-Sheet: Target BG is (120+70)/2 = 95 mg/dl.

[AntiPro&T1DM]

AntiPro&T1DM wrote:

> I recommend you commission our Cellosified
> Expert, Pro, to research and report back to your usual NG on cancer.

Pro could also focus is terminology expertise toward the oncology field!

What a bold experiment!

[Pro-Humanist FREELOVER]

On Thursday, September 21, 2017 at 2:04:02 PM UTC-5,

sjt....@googlemail.com wrote:

> Has anyone considered there is a cure for
> diabetes and cancer but the pharmaceutical
> and their masters do not want this revealed
> due to the massive loss they would make due
> to reduction in lifelong treatment . see how
> many cancer researchers have been found dead .
>
> if this is the case , the news article is

> designed to limit the damage . if he has stum-

> bled on a cure , they could have offered him
> a vast amount of money and got him to sign a
> gagging order .
>
> this makes the most sense to me

Daniel's 'cure' has been attributed (in a
news article dated June 13, 2017) as due
to an anti-autoimmune influence of a rare
gene. In that article there was no comment
that the rare gene influence could be repli-
cated in individuals without that rare gene.

- - -

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER

Diabetes Bubble / Diabetes Bubble Burst

(oustanding): http://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm

Promotion of a Cure for Insulinitis
(Insulinitis cure ideal): http://prohuman.net/cureinsulinitisassociation.htm

Glucose Anomalies Research regarding Potential
Cures / Improvements in Treatments

(hopefully): http://prohuman.net/glucoseanomaliesresearch.htm

- - -

[Pro-Humanist FREELOVER]

- - -

Follow-up: Link to article mentioned in my previous
post [with clarifying inserts, not part of original
article, included in brackets]:

On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 5:44:04 PM UTC-5,

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER wrote:

> On Thursday, September 21, 2017 at 2:04:02 PM UTC-5,
> sjt....@googlemail.com wrote:

> > Has anyone considered there is a cure for
> > diabetes and cancer but the pharmaceutical
> > and their masters do not want this revealed
> > due to the massive loss they would make due
> > to reduction in lifelong treatment . see how
> > many cancer researchers have been found dead .
> >
> > if this is the case , the news article is
> > designed to limit the damage . if he has stum-
> > bled on a cure , they could have offered him
> > a vast amount of money and got him to sign a
> > gagging order .
> >
> > this makes the most sense to me

> Daniel's 'cure' has been attributed (in a
> news article dated June 13, 2017) as due
> to an anti-autoimmune influence of a rare
> gene. In that article there was no comment
> that the rare gene influence could be repli-
> cated in individuals without that rare gene.

- - -

June 13, 2017

Rare gene explains why ... man [who was
diagnosed with Insulitis Insulinitis
6 to 7 years ago] no longer needs insulin
[as of December, 2016]
http://diabetestimes.co.uk/rare-gene-explains-why-type-1-man-no-longer-needs-insulin/
- - -

A man with [Insulitis Insulinitis] has been
told by doctors he has a rare type of gene
which explains why he no longer needs to
rely upon insulin to [deal with Insulitis
Insulinitis] ... .

Dan Darkes, from Daventry in Northamptonshire,
discovered he had [Insulitis Insulinitis] in
2010 shortly after leaving the Army. He started
using insulin [to stay alive, as everyone with
any type of Insulinitis must do], but he stopped
with the daily injections earlier this year ...

... when tests showed his blood sugar levels
were below average/average to low [too low until
he stopped using exogenous insulin, the only
case reported in which someone with Insulinitis
has been able to survive without exogenous
insulin, apart from those who've had islet ...

... cell or pancreas transplants, a minority
of which allow people to survive without any
exogenous insulin for over 5 years, requiring
the use of immunosuppressants].

His healthcare team were puzzled as to why
his body no longer required the insulin inject-
tions and so he travelled to America where
tests were carried out on him.

Mr Darkes, known as "Miracle Dan" to his
friends, returned to Northampton where his
results have since been analysed.

Speaking to the Chronicle and Echo newspaper,
he said: "My tests indicated that doctors
found a rare gene in my results and that has
acted as a 'backup' immune system. This has
led to insulin being reproduced in my pancreas.

"The gene has basically recharged my immune
system and pancreas, kicking into action beta
cells which have laid dormant for the time I
have had [Insulitis Insulinitis].

The consultants haven't ruled out the possi-
bility that me staying active and running was
the trauma or shock which triggered the healing
process. [Daniel participates in very long
marathons, but until the actual results of
the study on Dan is released, it's premature ...

... to assume anything other than a rare
gene being attributed as the cause of the
rare never-reported-before remission of
Insulitis Insulinitis.]

Prior to the tests, doctors estimated the
probability of Mr Darkes' miraculous recov-
ery being genuine at 80 per cent [where
that percent came from, unknown as it
appears to be arbitrary].

Since the [Insulinitis] community have
eagerly awaited further updates about his
condition in the hope that a cure for
[Insulitis Insulinitis] may [be] devel-
oped [the mentioned of a 'rare gene',
it's difficult to support that would ...

... be able to be replicated in anyone
else, but until the actual study re-
sults appear, it's unknown whether or
not this offers cure potential in any-
one else who has Insulitis Insulinitis].

- - - end of article - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Pro-Humanist FREELOVER, promoting putting
an end to the ancient outdated confusing
& misleading diabetes & diabetic way of
referring to our disparate High Glucose
Conditions (and one mostly non-glucose ...

... anomaly and one low glucose anomaly
which uses an outdated confusing reactive
hypoglycemia term) ...
http://prohuman.net/pix2/diabetesdiabeticconfusion.jpg
http://prohuman.net/pix2/diabetesdiabeticendingthemisunderstanding.jpg

... replacing all of that with new superior
clarifying medical terms which hopefully
will, in the future, end the diabetes /
diabetic / reactive hypoglycemia confusion
and misleading, putting an end to the use
of those terms, totally:
http://prohuman.net/pix2/diabetesbubblediabetesbubblebursttitle.jpg
http://prohuman.net/pix2/diabetesreactivehypoglycemiaoldnamesnewnames.jpg
http://prohuman.net/pix2/oldnamesnewimprovednames.jpg

Details of the solution, explained in the
best article on the web regarding glucose
anomalies and a mostly non-glucose anomaly,
including over 80 specific types of disparate
High Glucose Conditions ...

o Insulinitis (11 specific types of what
sometimes is called type 1 diabetes, but
often is confusingly called diabetes
without any clarifier, with 3 more
specific types disputable)

o Cellosis (21 specific types of what
sometimes is called type 2 diabetes, but
often is confusingly called diabetes
without any clarifier), PreCellosis (some-
times confusingly called prediabetes),
Gestational Cellosis (sometimes called
gestational diabetes)

o Diminosis (11 specific types of what
sometimes is called maturity onset
diabetes of the young), and Neonatal
Diminosis (8 specific types of what
sometimes is called neonatal diabetes
are permanent, 4 specific types are
transient); often these are confusingly
called diabetes without any clarifier

o Other High Glucose Conditions (24 specific
types of what sometimes are called other
diabetes mellitus, but often are confus-
ingly called diabetes without any clarifier)

... 6 specific types of a mostly non-glucose
anomaly Insipidus which often is confusingly
called diabetes without any clarifier, and 21
specific types of Hut (Hypoglycemia Uncaused
by Treatments for High Glucose, often confus-
ingly called reactive hypoglycemia):

Diabetes Bubble / Diabetes Bubble Burst

(superb): http://prohuman.net/diabetesbubblediabetesbubbleburst.htm

Promotion of a Cure for Insulinitis

(longed for): http://prohuman.net/cureinsulinitisassociation.htm

Glucose Anomalies Research regarding Potential
Cures / Improvements in Treatments

(if only): http://prohuman.net/glucoseanomaliesresearch.htm

- - -