Arnold
LacyR
about the Weider and Hatch.
Lacy H. Rich, Jr. (213) 851-6585
Tim Fogarty
It doesn't matter. We don't want tabloid journalism in misc.fitness.
Take it to a more appropriate news group.
--
Tim Fogarty (fog...@netcom.com) (fog...@sir-c.jpl.nasa.gov)
ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/fo/fogarty/home.html
http://sir-c.jpl.nasa.gov:8000/fogarty/home.html
beh...@skcla.monsanto.com
> LacyR (la...@aol.com) wrote:
>> Muscle & Fitness as an article this month that backs up what I have said
>> about the Weider and Hatch.
>> Lacy H. Rich, Jr. (213) 851-6585
>
> It doesn't matter. We don't want tabloid journalism in misc.fitness.
> Take it to a more appropriate news group.
>
some crazed fan! his details are crisp and his logic is clear. check out the
article and youll see. listen to the audiotape of mike mentzer that mm2k did,
he makes specific mention about a promoter in 1980 with a criminal record.
thats proof enough for me. this private war isnt about gay bashing and what
people did in the past as much as it is one thing. tearing down the monolopy of
the ifbb. do any of you out there compete? ok im sure you know how political
the npc is. the npc is the one way ticket to the pros. nothing else matters. if
you arent one of the boys you arent going to make shit for money and thats dead
wrong. guys in the wbf were making big bucks do you really think they folded
for any other reason than weiders scheming? cmon. when you read his shit mags
did you ever notice when one goes pro the show a picture and say this jag uses
the weider principles? this is a bunch of shit. baseball football tennis etc
all have more than one way to go to make money professionally, the ifbb is the
only way for bb's. and this is what lacy is fighting. you people should support
this person and one day when youre on a stage you might be glad you did.
> --
> i dont usually post but this was driving me nuts.
>all disclaimers apply these are only my words
Steve Russell
>Muscle & Fitness as an article this month that backs up what I have said
>about the Weider and Hatch.
>Lacy H. Rich, Jr. (213) 851-6585
I never doubted the veracity of what you said, I just
didn't care. No offense.
Steve R
sf...@wam.umd.edu
The Nephilim
>You don't rule the roost.
>Lacy H. Rich, Jr. (213) 851-6585
No, perhaps he doesn't, but please explain what benefit the misc.fitness
readership gains from your efforts at tabloid journalism.
Please try to contribute in a meaning fashion, one that has to do with (gasp,
here's a thought) _fitness_, and not an obsessed diatribe of accusations
regarding a random celebrity.
--
je...@teubner.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily."
Marchupo
to dredge up crap? Why do you post this kinda garbage here? Nobody
cares. And you are pissing people off! I expect a PERSONAL reply from
you Mr. Rich, I want to know what makes you tick, I want to know why you
feel compelled to post crap here, I wanna know why you _ACTUALLY_ think
you are a journlaist. TELL ME, PLEASE!
LacyR
LacyR
are getting messages on the system that can't be traced.
Subject: Returned mail: Remote protocol error
Date: 95-04-15 07:06:25 EDT
From: MAILER...@newsbf02.news.aol.com (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
To: la...@aol.com (LacyR)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
While connected to mail02.prod.aol.net [152.163.172.66] (tcp):
>>> DATA
<<< 550 <max%mamia.uucp@miavax>... Host unknown: No such file or directory
554 max%mamia.uucp@miavax (Max Southall)... Remote protocol error
----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by newsbf02.news.aol.com
(1.38.193.5/16.2) id AA11003; Sat, 15 Apr 1995 07:06:04 -0400
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 1995 07:06:04 -0400
From: la...@aol.com
Return-Path: <la...@aol.com>
Posted-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 1995 07:06:04 -0400
Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 1995 07:06:04 -0400
Message-Id: <950415110...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Reply-To: la...@aol.com (LacyR)
To: max%mamia.uucp@miavax (Max Southall)
Subject: Re: BARRY AND LESBIANS
X-Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
References: <1995041502...@mamia.uucp>
In-Reply-To: <1995041502...@mamia.uucp>
You seem to be all to willing to forget that I have publicly challanged
Arnold to sue me if I am lying. Arnold and his PR will probably say it is
beneath him. But that didn't stop him for sueing the widow of a video
projection builder over $18,000 when the man dropped dead before the
$75,000 unit was finished. It took the newspapers to embarass him into
removing the lien from her home. Arnold denied that he even knew that he
sued her. He claimed that it was his staff that hounded her for the
money. The husband did not have enough insurance for her to pay back the
entire amount. She was left penny less and Arnold's lein on her house.
After the newspapers printed the story his PR firm said he was removing
the lein. If he will go after pennyless widows he sure would go after me.
But then he couldn't stand all his buddies from the porno film being
questioned about his past. His lawyers have told him to ignore me. He
also know that he has one year to sue, and I've been printing and saying
this for years. I send him and Parker Public Relations copies.
Hey! If they're "typical," that implies that it's probable they're true of
everyone in the strength sports. Even (gasp!) Barry Merriman! Especially
since you seem to know so much about it! (Remember those employment
honesty
tests? If you know about dishonesty, it's because you are..!)
Why center this on Arnold? He used to be part of the problem, you're
saying,
but he left competition long ago. Let's go after everybody else, too.
That'll serve people even better. Let's name names! The more the better,
rumors OK too, spread 'em as wide as possible, the wildest ones you hear
especially!
I think we can fill in the blanks on your "Periodization Routine" now!
I *love* the sound of flesh burning - witch hunt!!
(Actually, I think it's probably coming, what with the McNeil murder et.
al.)
Lacy H. Rich, Jr. (213) 851-6585
----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
From MAILER...@newsbf02.news.aol.com Sat Apr 15 07:06:07 1995
Received: from mail02.mail.aol.com by mailgate.mail.aol.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.11/16.2) id AA043853967; Sat, 15 Apr 1995 07:06:07 -0400
Return-Path: <MAILER...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Received: from newsbf02.news.aol.com by mail02.mail.aol.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.11/16.2) id AA053813967; Sat, 15 Apr 1995 07:06:07 -0400
Received: by newsbf02.news.aol.com
(1.38.193.5/16.2) id AA11004; Sat, 15 Apr 1995 07:06:04 -0400
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 1995 07:06:04 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Subject: Returned mail: Remote protocol error
Posted-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 1995 07:06:04 -0400
Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 1995 07:06:04 -0400
Message-Id: <950415110...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
To: la...@aol.com (LacyR)
lo...@daemon.clinphys.pmh.toronto.on.ca
These postings are now official candidates for selective reading...
SELECT THEM OUT !!