Shenanigans of the Kings of Chutzpah

[Jim Welton]

Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (harrington) wrote in message news:<6JKZA63Q3779...@anonymous.poster>...
> Holocaust Industry And Zionism
> The Holocaust Shakedown
>
> Imagine that a robber walks into a bank, points a pistol at a teller,
> hands her a bag, and demands that she put all the money from her cash
> drawer in it. At first she protests, but then, after he threatens to
> shoot, she fills the robber's bag with cash. And then imagine that, as
> the robber walks out of the bank with his bag of loot, the bank guard
> opens the door for him, smiles at him, offers to hail a cab for him,
> and tells him to come again soon. After that it's not difficult to
> imagine that he probably will.
>
> That's about the way it's been with the Zionists recently. Two years
> ago they put a gun to the head of the Swiss people collectively and
> demanded billions of dollars in reparations for Swiss bank accounts
> they claimed had been owned by Zionists who disappeared during the
> Second World War. The Swiss initially protested that unclaimed Zionist
> bank accounts from the 1930s and 1940s amounted at most to a few
> million dollars, not to billions, and besides the war ended more than
> 50 years ago and claims should have been filed long ago. The Zionists
> threatened to shoot, figuratively speaking, by having their bought
> politicians in the United States prevent Swiss banks from doing
> business in America. Eventually they walked away with $1.25 billion in
> loot, with the Swiss apologizing for not having coughed it up sooner.
>
> After that sort of success with the Swiss one could hardly expect the
> Zionists to give up extortion and go straight. So anyway, they were
> back again soon, with demands against the Volkswagen Company for
> having used Zionist workers during the Second World War and providing
> them only with room and board but not paying them union-scale wages.
>
> One might think that these Zionist workers would be grateful to
> Volkswagen for keeping them alive during the war, feeding them, and
> giving them a roof over their heads, when so many German civilians had
> only bombed-out ruins to live in. Well, if you thought that, you just
> don't understand Zionists. The Zionists told the Volkswagen Company
> that if it ever wanted to sell any more cars in America, it had better
> cough up -- soon. And the bought politicians and the media bosses in
> America began rattling their sabers and talking loudly about sanctions
> of various sorts against Volkswagen.
>
> And so, like the Swiss banks, Volkswagen coughed up the money.
>
> Then the feeding frenzy started, just as I told you it would two years
> ago, when I predicted that after the Zionists had cleaned out the
> Swiss they would go after other victims in a long list. Volkswagen
> wasn't the only company which had used involuntary labor during the
> war. The Zionists went after Daimler-Benz and BMW and Siemens.
>
> And Switzerland wasn't the only country where Zionists could claim
> that Uncle Abe had stashed some of his loot sixty years ago, before
> the war. So they sued banks in France and in Britain and began moaning
> and whining in the media that the banks were being "insensitive" to
> poor, deserving "Holocaust survivors," who suddenly had remembered
> Uncle Abe's millions and needed it -- now. And then they remembered
> the insurance companies in Italy and Switzerland and Britain and
> elsewhere from whom they could claim that Uncle Abe once had had a
> life-insurance policy. Then they remembered that the Swedes owed them
> gold, and the Danes and the Norwegians. Even the Poles, whom the
> Zionists had ruled as Bolshevik commissars for nearly 50 years after
> the war, owed them, they claimed.
>
> The racket has worked the same in every case: pay us, or we will have
> our bought Gentile politicians pass laws making it impossible for you
> to continue doing business, and our people in the media will paint you
> as monsters who want to hang onto the profit you made when poor Uncle
> Abe and Aunt Sara were crammed into gas chambers, and then the
> gullible Gentile lemmings won't buy your products. If you give us any
> trouble or resist our demands we'll make an example of you, the way we
> did with the Swiss banks. Just pay us the few hundred million dollars
> we're demanding now, and we'll leave you alone. Otherwise, it'll end
> up costing you a lot more.
>
> And it has worked every time. Not one banker or businessman has stood
> up to them and flatly refused to pay. Not one president or prime
> minister has said to them, "All right, Zionist boys! You try a boycott
> against my country, and we'll organize a boycott against Israel. We'll
> round up all the Zionists in our country and send them packing." Not
> one has called the Zionists' bluff. They've all calculated that it is
> cheaper to pay the gangsters than to fight them, and so they pay.
> Honor means nothing to these businessmen and politicians. Principles
> mean nothing to them. All they care about is continuing to make money,
> continuing to stay in office.
>
> With this sort of attitude predominant among the Gentiles, one can
> hardly blame the Zionists for turning to extortion on a larger scale
> than ever before. They are successful at it; therefore they continue
> to do it. And they don't limit themselves to Europe or to those who
> allegedly cooperated with the Germans in their demand for reparations.
> A few months ago they filed a claim against Britain for $600 million
> they claim the British government confiscated from Zionists between
> 1940 and 1942 when the British governed Palestine. Remember, the
> Zionists were waging a guerrilla war against the British prior to
> 1948, when the British finally gave up and pulled out, letting the
> Zionists slaughter the Palestinians and establish the Zionist state of
> Israel on Palestinian land. The Zionists were kidnapping and murdering
> British soldiers in Palestine and assassinating diplomats. In 1946 the
> Zionists used a terrorist bomb to blow up the King David Hotel in
> Jerusalem, which was the British government headquarters. This Zionist
> forerunner of the Oklahoma City bombing killed a large number of
> British civilians and military people. And now the Zionists are
> demanding $600 million in reparations from the British!
>
> And of course, the Zionists also are expecting payoffs from American
> companies. Both Ford and General Motors had subsidiaries working in
> Germany when the Second World War began. The Ford plant in Germany
> made military vehicles for the Germans throughout the war, and the
> General Motors subsidiary, Opel, did the same. And so now the Zionists
> are claiming that both Ford and General Motors owe them a great deal
> of money because of that. The Zionists already have filed a class-
> action suit against Ford in a Federal court in New Jersey, seeking
> hundreds of millions of dollars in wages plus interest for Zionists
> who worked in Ford's German plant during the war. And because the
> businessmen who run Ford and General Motors today are the same sort as
> those who run the Volkswagen Company, they undoubtedly will pay off
> the Zionists rather than risk having the media portray them as
> "insensitive" types who profited from the so-called "Holocaust" and
> now refuse to share their loot with the poor, deserving Zionist
> "survivors."
>
> Two hundred years ago the American motto was, "Millions for defense,
> but not one cent for tribute." But in those days Americans were made
> of sterner stuff -- and I assume that our people in Europe were, too.
>
> Cash isn't the only thing the Zionists are going after. They have
> decided that a substantial portion of the art treasures of Europe
> really belonged to Uncle Abe too 60 years ago and ought to be returned
> to the Zionists now. It is true, of course, that during the war the
> German government had a keen interest in bringing as much Germanic art
> as possible back under German protection. They bought all the Vermeers
> and Rembrandts and Holbeins and D=FCrers and Halses and other Germanic
> art works as they could from owners in the conquered countries and
> brought them back to Germany. And when the works the Germans were
> interested in were in the hands of Zionists, they often brought
> pressure to bear and obtained the works at low prices. The Germans,
> however, generally weren't interested in modern art -- certainly not
> in Zionist paintings by Chagall or Modigliani, for example -- and a
> great many such modern paintings ended up in the hands of Zionist art
> dealers. In fact, the Germans often had agreements with Zionist art
> dealers, swapping the modern paintings they weren't interested in for
> the Germanic paintings they were interested in.
>
> The biggest of these Zionist dealers, Georges Wildenstein, was in
> Paris, and he acquired an enormous number of modern paintings during
> the war. After the war he brought them to New York and later sold
> hundreds of them to museums and private collectors around the world.
> The Zionists currently are engaged in a huge treasure hunt for those
> paintings now in Gentile hands which formerly belonged to Zionists.
> The facts that most of these paintings were acquired by their present
> owners from Zionist dealers such as the Wildensteins and that many of
> them were legally purchased from their Zionist owners during the war
> are glossed over. All of these paintings are characterized by the
> Zionists as "art stolen from victims of the Holocaust by the Nazis,"
> and they want it all back now.
>
> There's an interesting double standard here. A messy divorce in the
> Wildenstein family attracted public attention last year to the Zionist
> family's business dealings in Paris during the war, and another
> Zionist family claimed that the Wildensteins have artworks that
> actually should be returned to them, because they were forced to sell
> them at fire-sale prices during the war. The Wildensteins told them to
> buzz off: the statute of limitations for such claims expired long ago,
> the Wildensteins asserted. Of course, no Gentile owner dares make such
> an assertion. But in fact, there are statutes of limitations for most
> claims. Dormant bank accounts typically become the property of the
> government after being unclaimed for 20 years or so, but when the
> Swiss brought up that legality two years ago, the Zionists went into
> their "persecuted victim" act, feigning outrage that the Swiss should
> try to let a mere law stand between the Zionists and what they were
> claiming in reparations.
>
> Whenever the Zionists, in order to remind the world for the six-
> millionth time of their "victim" status, have accused some elderly
> German or Pole or Ukrainian or Lithuanian of having mistreated
> Zionists 55 years ago during the war, there is no question of a
> statute of limitations. If anyone mentions that legality, Zionist
> shrieking in all of their media quickly drowns him out. For an injury,
> real or imaginary, done to a Zionist by a Gentile there is no statute
> of limitations, no matter how much time has passed. The Zionists still
> celebrate every year in their Purim festival the revenge their
> ancestors took on the ancient Persians 2,500 years ago through their
> control of a corrupt king.
>
> Yet when the Polish government asked the government of Israel a few
> months ago to extradite a Zionist mass murderer, Solomon Morel, so
> that he could be tried in Poland for genocide, the Zionists refused.
> "There's a statute of limitations for extradition," the Israelis told
> the Poles, "and you're too late." Morel was the Zionist-communist
> commissar of a concentration camp in Poland after the war, and he had
> tortured hundreds of Poles and Germans to death. When he saw the
> possibility of retribution looming, Morel, like thousands of other
> Zionist criminals before him, fled to Israel. The horrifying
> atrocities committed by Solomon Morel have been described in the 1993
> book An Eye for an Eye by John Sack.
>
> This same double standard applies to every sort of interaction between
> Zionists and non-Zionists. It is a fact that in wars people suffer
> losses. Usually, within a few years after the wars are over, people
> try to get on with their lives, and they consider what is past to be
> past. If other people behaved the way the Zionists behave, then every
> Englishman whose family residence got hit by a bomb during the "blitz"
> of the Second World War would be clamoring now for the German
> government to reimburse him for the repairs that his grandparents had
> to make 55 years ago -- plus interest, of course.
>
> And if it's all right to go back 55 years for claims, why not go back
> 135 years and let all of the Americans whose ancestors' homes and
> farms in Georgia were burned by General Sherman collect damages from
> the U.S. government now -- plus interest, of course? Or why not go
> back 220 years and demand that Tony Blair's government pay reparations
> to all of those Americans whose ancestors suffered property loss from
> the Redcoats during the First American Revolution -- plus interest, of
> course? I mean, if the Zionists are allowed to keep score, without
> regard for time, why shouldn't everyone else? Why not set up some sort
> of World Court for Reparations? I imagine that there are a lot of
> Palestinians who would like to file claims against the state of
> Israel.
>
> The fact is that we would have international chaos if everybody
> behaved the way the Zionists do. So this raises two interesting
> questions: Why do the Zionists behave the way they do? And why do we
> let them get away with it? Well, I've already given an answer of a
> sort to the first question: the Zionists behave the way they do
> because we let them behave that way; it's just like the case of the
> bank robber, who will keep coming back until the bank guard stops
> being nice and shoots the robber. But there's really more to it than
> that. No one else is even inclined to make the sort of demands on the
> rest of the world that the Zionists do.
>
> The Zionists really are different. Their religion provides a few clues
> in this regard. It is a religion which tells them that all the
> property of the Gentiles really should belong to Zionists, that the
> Zionists are entitled to it. It's as blatant as anywhere in the 60th
> chapter of the book attributed to their prophet Isaiah, where they are
> told to keep their gates open all the time, so that all the wealth of
> the Gentiles can be brought to them. "Thou shalt suck the milk of the
> Gentiles," the Zionists are told. And if you think that doesn't really
> mean what it sounds like it means, you should look into the Talmud,
> where the Zionist sages, the Zionist interpreters of the Bible,
> explain to the rest of the Zionists what it means. The Talmud tells
> the Zionists that only Zionists are human beings, that the Gentiles
> are just animals created by the Zionist tribal god Yahweh to be used
> by the Zionists, like other animals are used. Because Gentiles are
> merely animals, they can't really own anything, and it is the duty of
> the Zionists to make sure they don't.
>
> Now all of this Biblical stuff and Talmudic stuff is very old and
> quaint and might seem irrelevant to a lawsuit against the Ford Motor
> Company by the Zionists today. But this old and quaint stuff is the
> basis of the Zionists' religion today. The religious Zionists really
> believe it. And the non-religious Zionists, the atheist Zionists,
> behave as if they believe it. And I think that in a certain sense they
> do. I think this belief is in their blood. I think that this is what
> accounts for their almost incredible arrogance in their dealings with
> non-Zionists.
>
> And of course, there's not just belief: there's also calculation. They
> understand that the success of their current effort to swindle the
> rest of the world out of every cent they can depends on three factors:
> it depends on their control of the mass media; it depends on the
> unprecedented degree of political corruption which exists almost
> everywhere in the Western world, on the unprecedented degree of
> democracy; and it depends on the confused and demoralized state of
> Gentiles everywhere.
>
> There never before has been a time when the Zionists have wielded as
> much open power as they do today. No previous government in the United
> States has had as many Zionists in positions of power as the present
> Clinton government. And that's pretty much the way it is everywhere in
> Europe too. The Zionists around Clinton are mirrored by high-ranking
> Zionists around Tony Blair in Britain. In Russia, the Zionists not
> only hold most of the key posts around the alcoholic and ailing Boris
> Yeltsin, they have one of their own as prime minister. And nearly
> everywhere except in the United States the Zionists have succeeded in
> having laws passed making it illegal for a patriot to tell his
> countrymen what the Zionists are up to. In Britain, in France, and in
> Germany hundreds of patriots are rotting in prisons today because they
> dared to speak the truth about the Zionists. In Switzerland the
> Zionists succeeded in having similar laws passed before they began
> extorting money from the Swiss. Only in Russia today are any
> significant number of patriots speaking out against the Zionists and
> daring the government to try to silence them.
>
> And I suppose it seems reasonable to the Zionists that when they have
> so much power they should use it to their advantage. They should go
> for everything they can get. The opportunity may pass. And they are
> going for it, everywhere and in every way. It's interesting to note
> that this display of unbridled greed and arrogance has made even some
> of their fellow Zionists a little nervous. Charles Krauthammer, a
> Zionist writer for the Washington Post, the second most powerful
> Zionist newspaper in the United States, wrote a column last month
> which begins with the words, "The pursuit of billions in Holocaust
> guilt money has gone from the unseemly to the disgraceful."
> Krauthammer refers to the whole racket as a "Holocaust shakedown."
> It's not that Krauthammer doesn't think the Zionists should have all
> the money they can get from the Gentiles. It's just that he's appalled
> by the reckless display of naked, unprincipled greed as more and more
> Zionist shysters -- that's what Krauthammer calls them -- trample each
> other in their current feeding frenzy. What if the Gentiles notice?
> What will the Gentiles think?
>
> Now, the unfortunate fact is that no non-Zionist writer for a major
> newspaper would dare to write what Krauthammer wrote -- not even in
> the United States, where it's still legal to write such things.
> They're all afraid. For two generations the Zionist media have
> conditioned them by instantly and loudly accusing anyone who opens his
> mouth of being a "racist" or a "hater" or an "anti-Semite." They've
> been conditioned to run for cover whenever they hear one of those
> accusations. And that is the answer to our second question, why do we
> let them get away with it?
>
> Their media control keeps the couch potatoes confused and unaware; the
> corrupt politicians who have come to characterize our democracy are
> always ready to front for them and betray the people whose interests
> they are supposed to be representing; and those among us who are
> perceptive enough and independent-minded enough to understand what is
> happening are nearly all too cowardly to speak out. So it is easy
> enough for me to predict that the Zionists will keep coming back for
> more -- and more -- and more -- until they either have it all, as in
> Russia today, or what Charles Krauthammer is concerned about happens,
> and the Gentiles notice. But really, the former outcome is much more
> likely.
>
> http://www.rense.com/general33/zionh.htm

FYI

Jim