Re: The Truth About "Martin Luther King"
I. M. White
<Ray_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106231139.7...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> big macbeth wrote:
>> problem with king were not his poltiical tactics which were
> justifiable
>> given the times. but, the notion that he was some kind of a saint is
>> bullshit.
>> yet, his effectiveness was founded on his presumed saintliness. so,
>> that he was a faker means something.
>
> I think the record would show that King's "sainthood" was based on his
> advocacy of non-violence.
>
> His personal, sexual, life was his and, IMO, not the public's. There
> is a regretful tendency today to exaggerate the importance of sexual
> matters, e.g. Jefferson's having had a black consort. This merely
> denigrates the real accomplishments they brought to our culture.
>
> ray
>
Shall we overlook his plagiarism, women-beating, lying, cheating, communist
ties, and his overall acting like the typical NIGGER as well? Or is that
also a requirement of your political correctness agenda?
--
What NIGGERS are missing leaves the NIGGERS without an ability to think
about what NIGGERS are missing.
Therefore, NIGGERS need not respond.
I. M. White
GaryG
news:cson6f$s4a$0...@pita.alt.net...
Such hate and fear...what a sad and pathetic way to live.
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
news:3CTHd.83$FK4...@fe05.lga...
>>
>> Shall we overlook his plagiarism, women-beating, lying, cheating,
> communist
>> ties, and his overall acting like the typical NIGGER as well? Or is that
>> also a requirement of your political correctness agenda?
> Such hate and fear...what a sad and pathetic way to live.
>
>
Explain how exposing the truth equates to "hate and fear".
GaryG
news:csp129$vc6$0...@pita.alt.net...
>
> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:3CTHd.83$FK4...@fe05.lga...
> > "I. M. Stupid" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:cson6f$s4a$0...@pita.alt.net...
>
>
>
>
> >>
> >> Shall we overlook his plagiarism, women-beating, lying, cheating,
> > communist
> >> ties, and his overall acting like the typical NIGGER as well? Or is
that
> >> also a requirement of your political correctness agenda?
>
>
>
> > Such hate and fear...what a sad and pathetic way to live.
> >
> >
>
>
> Explain how exposing the truth equates to "hate and fear".
"The truth" is that you're afraid of people who are different than you are.
That's the basis for most racism and genocide.
It's a typically human reaction, based in evolution, for us to be afraid of
"others". But, letting that fear overwhelm you and lead you into racist
nonsense is the sign of a very immature mind. Do you still live with your
parents?
FWIW, Hitler got people worked up with similar statements about "exposing
the truth".
>
Bill
"I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> >>
> >> Shall we overlook his plagiarism, women-beating, lying, cheating,
> > communist
> >> ties, and his overall acting like the typical NIGGER as well? Or is that
> >> also a requirement of your political correctness agenda?
>
>
>
> > Such hate and fear...what a sad and pathetic way to live.
> >
> >
>
>
> Explain how exposing the truth equates to "hate and fear".
>
>
>
> --
> What NIGGERS are missing leaves the NIGGERS without an ability to think
> about what NIGGERS are missing.
Indeed. Psycvhologists have shown that incompetent people don't know
they're incompetent. Throughout the human race, which is in fact the
only one we've got. Folks who don't know that are too dumb to know that
they don't khow that. Present company included.
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
>> > Such hate and fear...what a sad and pathetic way to live.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> Explain how exposing the truth equates to "hate and fear".
>
> "The truth" is that you're afraid of people who are different than you
> are.
> That's the basis for most racism and genocide.
Do show where I made any mention of my being "afraid" of any one different
than myself. Exactly what part of the truth that I posted are you afraid of?
Or is your brainwashed mind just operating on autopilot by spewing what you
were told to think?
I. M. White
"Bill" <ws...@cornell.edu> wrote in message
news:ws21-9D74BA.1...@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu...
Regardless of the type aptitude test given, NIGGERS as a group, always score
at the absolute bottom, bar none.
--
What NIGGERS are missing leaves the NIGGERS without an ability to think
about what NIGGERS are missing.
Therefore, NIGGERS need not respond.
I. M. White
GaryG
>
> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:l0UHd.1060$CZ6...@fe03.lga...
> > "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:csp129$vc6$0...@pita.alt.net...
>
>
>
> >> > Such hate and fear...what a sad and pathetic way to live.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Explain how exposing the truth equates to "hate and fear".
> >
> > "The truth" is that you're afraid of people who are different than you
> > are.
> > That's the basis for most racism and genocide.
>
>
> Do show where I made any mention of my being "afraid" of any one different
> than myself. Exactly what part of the truth that I posted are you afraid
of?
> Or is your brainwashed mind just operating on autopilot by spewing what
you
> were told to think?
>
>
> --
You don't have to say you're afraid. The fact you're posting such nonsense
clearly illustrates your fears.
BTW - You didn't answer my question...do you still live with your parents?
Tom
Essentially your cowardice in not posting under your real name says all
that it needs to say to me. That you're a sniveling little person who
hates things that are not like himself, or herself. With a Usenet
name like I.M. White, that says it all to me. You're probably a
racist with a cloak and a hood in the closet at your house, but would
wet your pants were you to reveal who you really are. People like you
always hide behind masks. Why the anonymity if you believe in this
vile retchedness that you spew forth into the world making it a less
peaceful place to live?
Tom
toto
<imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>"Bill" <ws...@cornell.edu> wrote in message
>news:ws21-9D74BA.1...@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu...
>> In article <csp129$vc6$0...@pita.alt.net>,
>> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>Regardless of the type aptitude test given, NIGGERS as a group, always score
>at the absolute bottom, bar none.
I bet they all score above you.
Is that why you announce that you are white in your nym?
Otherwise people might mistake you for one of them since
your IQ score is so low?
--
Dorothy
There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..
The Outer Limits
GaryG
news:6432113.VPdVBeDtOm@FreeBSD...
> midnight? There isn't one all White neighborhood in America that I would
be
> afraid to walk in, can't say the same about 'Da Black hoods' can you? You
> need a good dose of TNB to knock some sense into that hard head of yours.
There's a world of difference between avoiding high-crime neighborhoods, and
extending that fear into a racist mindset towards all people of a certain
race. The former is sensible self-preservation. The latter is juvenile and
stupid.
FWIW, there are plenty of upscale black neighborhoods in the suburbs around
DC and Atlanta that would be as safe as any other neighborhoods.
GaryG
> GaryG wrote:
>
>
> >> Answer this wigger: Would you go to east L.A., Compton or Harlem after
> >> midnight? There isn't one all White neighborhood in America that I
would
> > be
> >> afraid to walk in, can't say the same about 'Da Black hoods' can you?
You
> >> need a good dose of TNB to knock some sense into that hard head of
yours.
> >
> > There's a world of difference between avoiding high-crime neighborhoods,
> > and extending that fear into a racist mindset towards all people of a
> > certain
> > race. The former is sensible self-preservation. The latter is juvenile
> > and stupid.
>
> have your children swim in shark infested waters and claim that to label
> all sharks as killers are based on evil stereotypes and have them jump in,
> or would you error on the side of caution and find another place to swim?
Wow...you surely do have a lot of fear within you. "Help - the man-eating
black sharks are coming!", LOL.
Your analogy is also silly. Apparently, you fear black people because some
of them (a tiny minority) commit homicide. But, ALL peoples commit
homicide! It is, sadly, a behavior common to every race, ethnic group, and
culture.
> Avoiding Blacks and their 'hoods' is like - not swimming with sharks. It's
> good common sense.
>
> > FWIW, there are plenty of upscale black neighborhoods in the suburbs
> > around DC and Atlanta that would be as safe as any other neighborhoods.
>
> You would probably still end up with the Reginald Denny treatment.
Yeah, like some surgeon who drives a Mercedes is gonna whoop up on me. Once
again, your fear and ignorance is on display for all to see.
GG
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
It's so funny when liberals try to use the rare exception to defend the
rule.
Gary, IN: 85% NIGGER
Amherst, NY : 88.3% White
Gary, IN: America's Most Dangerous City
Amherst, NY: America's Safest City
SOURCES:
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2001/cb01cn176.html
http://www.amherstida.com/facts/population.htm
http://www.morganquitno.com/safecity5.htm
Enough said.
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
Well look here!!!! We have yet another bed-wetting liberal who has allowed
himself to be brainwashed into what to think rather than find the intestinal
fortitude to think on his own. Perhaps you would like to also enlighten us
on why NIGGERS are "claimed" to be the first so-called humans in existance
on this earth, walk on the most fertile and richest land in the world, yet
ended up being everyone elses slave, have not evolved much past mud huts and
using termite sticks, are the most disease-ridden, savage, and impoverished
race on the planet, and depend on the rest of the world for their mere
ptiful existence. Of course, knowing how you liberals are terrified of
addressing the truth head-on and typically avoid it at all costs, I will
expect no less from you than than more unsubstantiated opinions and
subsequent name-calling.
GaryG
>
> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:DmXHd.1354$_L1....@fe03.lga...
> > "Tommy" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
> > news:3663481.2Lp9XTD8qj@FreeBSD...
> >> GaryG wrote:
>
>
>
> It's so funny when liberals try to use the rare exception to defend the
> rule.
And it's so sad when small-minded racists succumb to their fears, and see
anyone unlike themselves as less than human.
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
Evasion noted.
GaryG
hate in message news:cspkbh$78h$0...@pita.alt.net...
>
> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:0GVHd.1082$Fm....@fe03.lga...
>
>
You sound like a very angry person...is that working for you? Does it make
you feel more powerful to feel such anger? That whole "us vs. them" thing
is very seductive when you have nothing going for you...it's been used for
centuries to enlist young men into committing acts of violence (whether
justified or not).
Like many extremists (including most Muslim fundamentalists), I suspect you
are a young male, with few prospects, probably still living at home, and not
getting laid enough (if at all). Hopefully, as you mature and acquire some
power and resources for yourself (a job, a car, a girl, etc.), you'll put
aside your juvenile fantasies of "racial purity", and the hate that comes
with it.
BTW - there are clearly many significant problems (crime, poverty, etc.) in
the black community - even Bill Cosby agrees with that. But, the anger and
race hatred that you spew reflects much more on your own inner fears and
insecurities.
GG
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
<snipped worthless wigger babble>
> BTW - there are clearly many significant problems (crime, poverty, etc.)
> in
> the black community - even Bill Cosby agrees with that.
Which is what I said all along.
But, the anger and
> race hatred that you spew reflects much more on your own inner fears and
> insecurities.
Do show where I posted "race hatred, fear, and insecurities". Fact is, that
was YOUR opinion as a lame evasive defense when I posted the truth about
NIGGERS; which you have now conceded as being an accurate depiction. Of
course, your "spewing" lies to divert attention from the truth that I posted
was most expected, as it is the liberals only defense. No surprise there.
GaryG
>
> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:tMYHd.1930$1b3...@fe03.lga...
>
>
> > race hatred that you spew reflects much more on your own inner fears and
> > insecurities.
>
>
> Do show where I posted "race hatred, fear, and insecurities".
Your signature illustrates your race hatred, and everything else you write
clearly illustrates your fears and insecurities.
BTW - you've never answered the question about whether or not you live with
your parents.
GG
Way Back Jack
wrote:
The safest/most dangerous city changes from year to year but there is
a definite correlation between the % of blacks and safety/danger.
Here are data from a recent year:
Safest Cities (75,000 or more) per
http://advertisers.americancityandcounty.com/ar/government_amherst_ny_tops/
1. Amherst, N.Y 3.9%
http://www.epodunk.com/cgi-bin/popInfo.php?locIndex=91
2. Newton, Mass. 2.0%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Newton-Massachusetts.html
3. Mission Viejo, Calif. 1.1%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Mission-Viejo-California.html
4. Cary, N.C. 6.1%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Cary-North-Carolina.html
5. Brick Township, N.J. (Less than 1% as computed by dividing 75,325
population into 751 blacks)
http://www.co.ocean.nj.us/planning/databook/09RACE2000.htm
6. Simi Valley, Calif. 1.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Simi-Valley-California.html
7. Sunnyvale, Calif. 2.2%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Sunnyvale-California.html
8. Colonie, N.Y. 3.5%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Colonie-New-York.html
9. Sterling Heights, Mich. 1.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Sterling-Heights-Michigan.html
10. Clarkstown, N.Y 7.9%
http://www.epodunk.com/cgi-bin/popInfo.php?locIndex=409
____________________
Most Dangerous Cities (75,000 or more) per
http://advertisers.americancityandcounty.com/ar/government_amherst_ny_tops/
1. Detroit 81.6%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Detroit-Michigan.html
2. Atlanta 61.4%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Atlanta-Georgia.html
3. St. Louis 51.2%
http://www.city-data.com/city/St.-Louis-Missouri.html
4. Baltimore 64.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Baltimore-Maryland.html
5. Gary, Ind. 84.0%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Gary-Indiana.html
6. Camden, N.J. 53.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Camden-New-Jersey.html
7. Tampa 26.1%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Tampa-Florida.html
8. West Palm Beach, Fla. 32.2%
http://www.city-data.com/city/West-Palm-Beach-Florida.html
9. Compton, Calif. 40.3% (White non-Hispanic 1.0%)
http://www.city-data.com/city/Compton-California.html
10. Memphis, Tenn. 61.4%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Memphis-Tennessee.html
I. M. White
"toto" <scar...@wicked.witch> wrote in message
news:8ed0v0l9g5br5o7bf...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:56:51 -0500, "I. M. White"
> <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bill" <ws...@cornell.edu> wrote in message
>>news:ws21-9D74BA.1...@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu...
>>> In article <csp129$vc6$0...@pita.alt.net>,
>>> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>Regardless of the type aptitude test given, NIGGERS as a group, always
>>score
>>at the absolute bottom, bar none.
>
> I bet they all score above you.
Is that your opinion or simply a place where you became tired of thinking? I
deal with facts, not the opinions of brainwashed wiggers who cower from the
truth.
>
> Is that why you announce that you are white in your nym?
Are you "ASSuming" that my name isn't I. M. White?
> Otherwise people might mistake you for one of them since
> your IQ score is so low?
Your opinion aside, it's obvious you believe that PC thinking/social policy
is more important than examining reality. If you wish to debate the merits
of NIGGER behavior with credible facts, I'm all ears! Then again, being it's
obvious that you've been swilling bilgewater supplied by the mainstream
media for so long you're no longer able to recognize the truth, I will
expect more liberal innuendoes instead.
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/index466.htm
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:cspmva$fl9$0...@pita.alt.net...
>>
>> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
>> news:tMYHd.1930$1b3...@fe03.lga...
>>
>>
>> But, the anger and
>> > race hatred that you spew reflects much more on your own inner fears
>> > and
>> > insecurities.
>>
>>
>> Do show where I posted "race hatred, fear, and insecurities".
>
> Your signature illustrates your race hatred, and everything else you write
> clearly illustrates your fears and insecurities.
Are opinions the best you can offer as a defense against the abhorrent
behavior of NIGGERS? Once again, show where I posted "race hatred, fear, and
insecurities" or be exposed for the liar that you are showing yourself to
be.
I. M. White
"Way Back Jack" <wind...@home.net> wrote in message
news:41f0614...@news-60.giganews.com...
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:07:20 -0800, "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com>
> wrote:
Excellent! Next we shall expect the "correlation isn't causation" rhetoric
that NIGGER-loving liberals love to spew as a lame defense of the facts
presented.
I. M. White
"Tom" <gian...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106257992.9...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> I. M. White wrote:
>> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
>> news:l0UHd.1060$CZ6...@fe03.lga...
>> > "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > news:csp129$vc6$0...@pita.alt.net...
>>
>>
>>
>> >> > Such hate and fear...what a sad and pathetic way to live.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>
> Essentially your cowardice in not posting under your real name says all
> that it needs to say to me. That you're a sniveling little person who
> hates things that are not like himself, or herself. With a Usenet
> name like I.M. White, that says it all to me.
Your unsubstantiated opinions notwithstanding, post proof that I'm not
posting under my real name.
GaryG
>
> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:BfZHd.2131$OD3....@fe03.lga...
> > "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:cspmva$fl9$0...@pita.alt.net...
> >>
> >> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> >> news:tMYHd.1930$1b3...@fe03.lga...
> >>
> >>
> >> But, the anger and
> >> > race hatred that you spew reflects much more on your own inner fears
> >> > and
> >> > insecurities.
> >>
> >>
> >> Do show where I posted "race hatred, fear, and insecurities".
> >
>
>
>
> > Your signature illustrates your race hatred, and everything else you
write
> > clearly illustrates your fears and insecurities.
>
>
> Are opinions the best you can offer as a defense against the abhorrent
> behavior of NIGGERS? Once again, show where I posted "race hatred, fear,
and
> insecurities" or be exposed for the liar that you are showing yourself to
> be.
>
I answered you already, but you're too dense to get it. Between your
handle, and your sig, it's clear that you have hatred against the black
race. And, your intense focus on black "crime" indicates a deep-seated fear
and insecurity...that is, after all, the basis of racism.
And once again you've dodged the question about whether or not you live with
your parents, so I'll assume that you do. Does your mommy know you post
such hateful stuff? I'll bet she'd be very disappointed in you if she did.
And, when was the last time you got laid? I'm guessing that it's been too
long...give up that silly hatred, find a girl, and get a life (a real life,
not the hate-filled virtual-life you have now).
Bob LeChevalier
>Perhaps you would like to also enlighten us
>on why NIGGERS are "claimed" to be the first so-called humans in existance
>on this earth, walk on the most fertile and richest land in the world, yet
>ended up being everyone elses slave, have not evolved much past mud huts and
>using termite sticks, are the most disease-ridden, savage, and impoverished
>race on the planet, and depend on the rest of the world for their mere
>ptiful existence.
A whole bunch of errors in there, but the topic was thoroughly
addressed by Jared Diamond.
lojbab
--
lojbab loj...@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier
>> Your signature illustrates your race hatred, and everything else you write
>> clearly illustrates your fears and insecurities.
>
>Are opinions the best you can offer as a defense against the abhorrent
>behavior of NIGGERS? Once again, show where I posted "race hatred, fear, and
>insecurities"
The fact that you find it worth your time to post your nonsense
betrays your racial hatred, fear, and insecurities.
Steve Cipoletti
wrote:
>You don't have to say you're afraid. The fact you're posting such nonsense
>clearly illustrates your fears.
There you have it folks, the liberal $3.00 Psychology course at work.
GaryG, what makes what I.M. White stated, "nonsense", may I ask? And
just how does this "nonsense" interact with fear?
GaryG
news:0201v0l47snj8a94t...@4ax.com...
Fear is at the very heart of the racist thought process (such as it is).
Fear of blacks, browns, Asians, Jews, homosexuals...fear of anyone who is
different.
I assume it makes you feel somewhat better about your own situation to feel
hatred towards others, but that's more a sad commentary on yourself than a
realistic assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of different cultures,
ethnic groups, etc.
Bill
spa...@nogood.com wrote:
> >I assume it makes you feel somewhat better about your own situation to feel
> >hatred towards others, but that's more a sad commentary on yourself than a
> >realistic assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of different cultures,
> >ethnic groups, etc.
> >
> What a load of crap. Libs claim that it's hatred, fear, etc. What
> about "I don't like"? I don't like nigs, wigs, muslims but it doesn't
> mean I hate them. I think wigs (like Eminem) are hilarious when they
> act all jiggy and have that stupidbadass look on their faces. I don't
> hate them, though. I'm glad Eminem can make money, but I'm sad that
> he's niggerizing white kids.
>
> The very foundation of Islam is violence and hatred. And don't give me
> that crap about the Inquisition and Crusades.
Why? Because it screws up your argument?
>
> Some people just don't like others, as opposed to hating. I don't want
> my neighborhood turning into a hood or a mosque being built around the
> block, not because of hatred but because I don't like certain elements
> that tend to fuck everything up.
Courage is doing something you're afraid of. tolerance is learning to
liv with what you don't like. You have a choice: learn tolerance or
spend your life complaining. It ain't gonna go away.
Bill
"I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Excellent! Next we shall expect the "correlation isn't causation" rhetoric
> that NIGGER-loving liberals love to spew as a lame defense of the facts
> presented.
But the only "facts" you've presented are correlations. Correlations
need to be examined to see what the causes behind them are. Go take a
course in statistics.
Bob LeChevalier
>Some people just don't like others, as opposed to hating.
Same difference.
>hate
>1 a : intense hostility and aversion usually deriving from fear,
> anger, or sense of injury b : extreme dislike or antipathy
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your "dislike" is extreme evidenced by the fact that you keeping
posting about it, unlike sane people. Thus you hate.
>I don't want
>my neighborhood turning into a hood or a mosque being built around the
>block, not because of hatred but because I don't like certain elements
>that tend to fuck everything up.
"sense of injury". Or fear of the "fucking everything up".
Way Back Jack
Perhaps you can tell us what causes an increase in criminality, STDs,
and OOWs despite 40 years of preferential treatment, eh?
Bro
I. M. White
"Bob LeChevalier" <loj...@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:39u0v05kjqkfi1npp...@4ax.com...
> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
What would you say if a Liberal "social scientist" told you to
jump into a pool filled with five hundred ravenous piranhas?
If you valued your life, you'd certainly refuse the invitation.
But what if the Liberal "social scientist" tried to convince you
to go ahead and jump in, with the argument that "not all of the
piranhas are aggressive. Some of them probably just want to make
friends with you, and really aren't hungry either. To say that a
piranha is going to attack you, just because he's a piranha, is a
wicked stereotype, and probably contributes to the piranhas'
negative feelings about you."
If that argument was made to you, would you then jump into the
pool filled with piranhas? I don't think so. You'd probably
figure, quite logically, that even if there were one or two or
even a dozen piranhas that by chance or due to a recent meal
decided not to attack you, that certainly wouldn't change the
bloodthirsty behavior of the other 488. And it certainly
wouldn't change the outcome of any foolish foray into the pool.
But let's say you were foolish enough to listen to the Liberal
"social scientist," and you did jump into the pool filled with
piranhas. You somehow managed to survive. You made it to the
other side of the pool, where you jumped out, but you were
seriously injured in the process. After you got out of the
hospital, where your wounds were stitched up and your lost blood
was replaced, you were paid a visit by your old "friend," the
Liberal "social scientist."
Needless to say, you weren't too happy to see him, but before you
could say a word, he started talking.
"I'm awfully sorry to see how you've been hurt," he said, "but it
isn't my fault at all, you see."
You replied, "You mean, oh great and wise social scientist, that
you can finally see that those piranhas are vicious and I don't
belong in the pool with them?"
"No, I don't mean that at all," answered the Liberal "social
scientist," "It's not the piranhas' fault that you almost got
eaten alive. It's not the poor piranhas' fault at all! It's
your fault!"
"My fault!" you exclaim, "How the hell could it be my fault?"
"Ah, how little you goyim understand," sighed our Liberal genius,
"Don't you see that what happened to you only happened because those
poor piranhas were underprivileged and hungry? If you'd given them
enough food and a decent chance at life, then they wouldn't have
attacked you like they did. When was the last time you helped a
piranha?
They've been struggling for centuries while your kind lived in
luxury. Don't you think it's time the tables were turned? And
not only that, but your kind have caused the poor innocent piranhas
to feel left out in your society. Naturally they harbor negative
feelings about you, when you never want to have anything to do with
them.
You should understand that we all hate what we don't know. We must
integrate piranhas into our society, keep them in our swimming pools
and bathtubs and introduce them into all our rivers, mountain streams,
and lakes. By associating with piranhas every day, and by feeding them
as
much as they want to eat, eventually a spirit of brotherhood will
emerge and we and the piranhas will live together in peace, harmony,
and joyous diversity evermore. But you, Mr. Ordinary Human" - and
here the Liberal "social scientist" thrust his flabby little
finger into your face - "you are going to have to change your
evil ways before we can have that happy world!"
"You're out of your mind!" you reply. "Piranhas may be fine in
the Amazon jungle, but you're crazy if you think we can live and
associate with them every day. We and they just don't belong
together - and if you're so in love with piranhas, why don't YOU
go on a little swim with them? And if you think I'm going to
waste my money and time feeding them and helping them multiply
just so they can eat me and my family alive at some time in the
future, Mr. Genius social scientist, then you've got another
think coming!" With that you kick his delicate carcass
downstairs.
Still smarting from his fall, and rapidly retreating backwards,
the Liberal "social scientist" shakes his spindly fist and calls
back to you, "Your generation is hopeless. You'll never
understand the need to integrate with and support piranhas. But
your children will. Our 'brotherhood' program at the elementary
school will teach them that it's their duty to live with and help
the poor piranhas. They'll be swimming with them every day at
the school's pool. And that's just the first step! There's
nothing you can do about it!"
Gradually the voice of your former friend the Liberal fades away,
but he's certainly given you something to think about, hasn't he?
**This article was based on the *American Dissident Voices* program of
10th April, 1993.
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> "Steve Cipoletti" <St...@politicallyincorrect.com> wrote in message
> news:0201v0l47snj8a94t...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:47:38 -0800, "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >You don't have to say you're afraid. The fact you're posting such
> nonsense
>> >clearly illustrates your fears.
>>
>>
>> There you have it folks, the liberal $3.00 Psychology course at work.
>>
>> GaryG, what makes what I.M. White stated, "nonsense", may I ask? And
>> just how does this "nonsense" interact with fear?
>
> Fear is at the very heart of the racist thought process (such as it is).
> Fear of blacks, browns, Asians, Jews, homosexuals...fear of anyone who is
> different.
>
Often one that is labeled as a racist is simply a conservative
who is winning a debate with a liberal......
> I assume it makes you feel somewhat better about your own situation to
> feel
> hatred towards others, but that's more a sad commentary on yourself than a
> realistic assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of different
> cultures,
> ethnic groups, etc.
IOW, we should look the other way and be an apologist like you when
confronted with a very small portion of the population who is responsible
for the majority of violent crimes because it is nothing more than a
"weakness of different cultures"? Thanks for clearing that up.
I. M. White
<spa...@nogood.com> wrote in message
news:rfd2v0lqo7a1fqrpk...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:39:54 -0800, "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com>
> wrote:
> What a load of crap. Libs claim that it's hatred, fear, etc. What
> about "I don't like"? I don't like nigs, wigs, muslims but it doesn't
> mean I hate them. I think wigs (like Eminem) are hilarious when they
> act all jiggy and have that stupidbadass look on their faces. I don't
> hate them, though. I'm glad Eminem can make money, but I'm sad that
> he's niggerizing white kids.
>
> The very foundation of Islam is violence and hatred. And don't give me
> that crap about the Inquisition and Crusades.
>
> Some people just don't like others, as opposed to hating. I don't want
> my neighborhood turning into a hood or a mosque being built around the
> block, not because of hatred but because I don't like certain elements
> that tend to fuck everything up.
You raise some excellent points. It's the behavior of NIGGERS that we
realists oppose; not the color of their skin. But being the NIGGER
appologists have no defense against the truth we post about NIGGER behavior,
their only hope is to resort to name calling and attacking the messenger. We
realists don't hate NIGGERS any more than we hate any other wild animal; we
merely act accordingly to protect our best interest much like when
encountering a wild bear, lion, etc.
I. M. White
> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Your signature illustrates your race hatred, and everything else you
>>> write
>>> clearly illustrates your fears and insecurities.
>>
>>Are opinions the best you can offer as a defense against the abhorrent
>>behavior of NIGGERS? Once again, show where I posted "race hatred, fear,
>>and
>>insecurities"
>
> The fact that you find it worth your time to post your nonsense
> betrays your racial hatred, fear, and insecurities.
Much like you found it worth YOUR time to post the above opinion? And if
what I
post is "nonsense" as you claim, why is it you are never able to refute it
with anything more than your unsubstantiated opinion, not to mention the
fact that I already exposed you to be a liar.
http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Lbl/Lbl-VitalFactsYouNeedToKnow.html
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
>> Answer this wigger: Would you go to east L.A., Compton or Harlem after
>> midnight? There isn't one all White neighborhood in America that I would
> be
>> afraid to walk in, can't say the same about 'Da Black hoods' can you? You
>> need a good dose of TNB to knock some sense into that hard head of yours.
>
> There's a world of difference between avoiding high-crime neighborhoods,
> and
> extending that fear into a racist mindset towards all people of a certain
> race. The former is sensible self-preservation. The latter is juvenile
> and
> stupid.
>
> FWIW, there are plenty of upscale black neighborhoods in the suburbs
> around
> DC and Atlanta that would be as safe as any other neighborhoods.
>
>
Show where he made any mention of "high-crime neighborhoods". Or are you
conceding to the fact that NIGGERS are indeed violent savages?
GaryG
news:csrrbs$955$0...@pita.alt.net...
>
> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:DYWHd.1198$Hs1...@fe03.lga...
> > "Tommy" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
> > news:6432113.VPdVBeDtOm@FreeBSD...
>
>
>
>
> >> Answer this wigger: Would you go to east L.A., Compton or Harlem after
> >> midnight? There isn't one all White neighborhood in America that I
would
> > be
> >> afraid to walk in, can't say the same about 'Da Black hoods' can you?
You
> >> need a good dose of TNB to knock some sense into that hard head of
yours.
> >
>
>
>
> > There's a world of difference between avoiding high-crime neighborhoods,
> > and
> > extending that fear into a racist mindset towards all people of a
certain
> > race. The former is sensible self-preservation. The latter is juvenile
> > and
> > stupid.
> >
> > FWIW, there are plenty of upscale black neighborhoods in the suburbs
> > around
> > DC and Atlanta that would be as safe as any other neighborhoods.
> >
> >
>
>
> Show where he made any mention of "high-crime neighborhoods". Or are you
> conceding to the fact that NIGGERS are indeed violent savages?
>
Are you conceding that you still live with your parents?
FWIW, you seem very immature, and quite angry. Get laid, or get help...
GaryG
>
> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:AI%Hd.2580$bY5....@fe03.lga...
> > "Steve Cipoletti" <St...@politicallyincorrect.com> wrote in message
> > news:0201v0l47snj8a94t...@4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:47:38 -0800, "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >You don't have to say you're afraid. The fact you're posting such
> > nonsense
> >> >clearly illustrates your fears.
> >>
> >>
> >> There you have it folks, the liberal $3.00 Psychology course at work.
> >>
> >> GaryG, what makes what I.M. White stated, "nonsense", may I ask? And
> >> just how does this "nonsense" interact with fear?
> >
>
>
>
> > Fear is at the very heart of the racist thought process (such as it is).
> > Fear of blacks, browns, Asians, Jews, homosexuals...fear of anyone who
is
> > different.
> >
>
>
> Often one that is labeled as a racist is simply a conservative
> who is winning a debate with a liberal......
>
I'm probably more conservative than you realize...it's just that you're so
far out in right field that the whole world looks "liberal" to you (with the
possible exception of your pimple-faced, small-minded, redneck/racist
friends).
>
>
>
>
>
> > I assume it makes you feel somewhat better about your own situation to
> > feel
> > hatred towards others, but that's more a sad commentary on yourself than
a
> > realistic assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of different
> > cultures,
> > ethnic groups, etc.
>
>
>
> IOW, we should look the other way and be an apologist like you when
> confronted with a very small portion of the population who is responsible
> for the majority of violent crimes because it is nothing more than a
> "weakness of different cultures"? Thanks for clearing that up.
As I've said before, there's a world of difference between debating the
relative strengths and weaknesses of different groups, and the juvenile
vitriol that you are spewing.
Joe McC
> Often one that is labeled as a racist is simply a conservative
> who is winning a debate with a liberal......
I have a label for you...you're a fucking monster of the worst ilk.
> IOW, we should look the other way and be an apologist like you when
> confronted with a very small portion of the population who is responsible
> for the majority of violent crimes because it is nothing more than a
> "weakness of different cultures"? Thanks for clearing that up.
>
Here in Scotland, we have a very broad mix of African, Caribbean, Asian,
Chinese, Indian & Pakistani people in the population. The overwhelming
majority of them are intelligent, professional people & business folk who
contribute in a meaningful way to their community. We're all the richer for
it.
Of course, we still have prisons & ours are just as full as yours.
But at least ours are full of ignorant, vicious white trash like you. You &
your whining, poisonous cronies are little more than human pollution.
Please - don't ever visit, you miserable cowardly fuckwit.
I. M. White
"Joe McC" <j...@NOSPAMredhotchilli.plus.com> wrote in message
news:41f19296$0$65413$ed26...@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
>
> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:csrr1h$7gr$0...@pita.alt.net...
>
>> Often one that is labeled as a racist is simply a conservative
>> who is winning a debate with a liberal......
>
> I have a label for you...you're a fucking monster of the worst ilk.
Your meaningless opinion is just that, a meaningless opinion. Nonetheles, if
you wish to debate the merits of NIGGER infestation, I'll be more than happy
to oblige you with factual information void of human emotion.
> Here in Scotland, we have a very broad mix of African, Caribbean, Asian,
> Chinese, Indian & Pakistani people in the population. The overwhelming
> majority of them are intelligent, professional people & business folk who
> contribute in a meaningful way to their community. We're all the richer
> for it.
How exactly is that? And as for NIGGERS being intelligent, regardless of the
type test, every study known to mankind shows that NIGGERS score at the
absolute bottom, bar none. if you have something credible that refutes that
fact, I'm all ears.
>
> Of course, we still have prisons & ours are just as full as yours.
>
> But at least ours are full of ignorant, vicious white trash like you. You
> & your whining, poisonous cronies are little more than human pollution.
>
Our NIGGER population is less than 13%, yet NIGGERS are responsible for more
than 50% of the violent crimes commited in this country. Needless to say,
NIGGERS are the overwhelming majority of the prison population in U.S.. So
much so, that there are more NIGGERS in prison than college, and they have
more opportunities given to them to go to college than anyone else. Speaks
volumes, doesn't it, wigger.
> Please - don't ever visit, you miserable cowardly fuckwit.
>
The truth terrifies you, doesn't it?
Joe McC
>
> The truth terrifies you, doesn't it?
I suspect any pitiful & redundant notoriety generated by your rants sexually
arouses you in some perverse, despairing way. I'm betting you masturbate
furiously while typing your demented lunacy.
So use tissues, teen cretin. You may gum up your keyboard if you're not
careful.
And wipe that dribble from your gaping maw. It's unseemly & hardly befits a
great Aryan Warrior.
toto
<imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Show where he made any mention of "high-crime neighborhoods". Or are you
>conceding to the fact that NIGGERS are indeed violent savages?
Interestingly, there is a study from the University of Wisconsin which
shows that residents *perceive* crime to be a problem in direct
proportion to the number of young black men who live in the
neighborhood even in neighborhoods which have low rates of
crime.
http://www.news.wisc.edu/story.php?get=7433
The study, by sociology assistant professor Lincoln Quillian and
graduate student Devah Pager, found residents in Chicago,
Baltimore and Seattle to be influenced strongly by the racial
composition of their neighborhood in judging its level of crime.
The study indicates that even in neighborhoods with low crime
rates, residents perceive crime to be a big problem when young
black men live in the area.
In fact, the percentage of young black men in a neighborhood
more closely matched perceptions of crime than the actual
neighborhood crime rates as reported in police department
and victimization surveys. The authors found that the higher the
percentage of young black men in a neighborhood, the greater
the residents' perceptions of crime.
"These results demonstrate the strong stereotypes people have
about blacks and crime. People automatically assume that if
there are young black men around, they must be engaged in
crime. It's just not true," Pager says.
In the study, residents were asked to rate the level of crime in
their neighborhoods. These ratings were then matched with
neighborhood census data and police reports.
"The significance of this study is that it is the first study to show
that white perceptions associating black neighbors with higher
crime do not merely reflect actual crime but result from an
overestimation of the association between race and crime,"
Quillian says.
--
Dorothy
There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..
The Outer Limits
toto
<imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Show where he made any mention of "high-crime neighborhoods". Or are you
>conceding to the fact that NIGGERS are indeed violent savages?
Btw, as black people do move up economically, it is becoming more
common for black subdivisions to be quite low in crime in the suburbs.
Note that this is not *new* and that black people do need to watch
out for the envy of their white neighbors when they do succeed.
North Tulsa, Oklahoma which was once commonly referred to
as "Black Wall Street" or "Little Africa". Reportedly, this area of
15,000 had several successful black-owned businesses including
financial institutions, law offices, medical practices, restaurants,
and retail stores.
“On May 31, 1921,the successful Black Greenwood district
was completely destroyed by one of the worse race riots in
U.S. history.
A 19 year old Black male accidentally stumbled on a jerky
elevator and bumped the 17-year-old White elevator operator
who screamed. The frightened young fellow was seen running
from the elevator by a group of Whites and by late afternoon
the "Tulsa Tribune" reported that the girl had been raped.
Despite the girl’s denial of any wrongdoing, the boy was
arrested and a large mob of 2000 White men came to the
jail to lynch the prisoner.
About 75 armed African Americans came to the jail to offer
assistance to the sheriff to protect the prisoner. The sheriff
not only refused the assistance but also deputized the White
mob to disarm the Blacks. With a defenseless Black
community before them, the White mob advanced to the
Greenwood district where they first looted and then burned
all Black businesses, homes, and churches. Any Black
resisters were shot and thrown into the fires. When the
National Guard arrived, they assisted the others by arresting
all Black men, women, and children, and herding them into
detention centers at the Baseball Park and Convention Hall.
As many as 4,000 Blacks were held under armed guard in
detention…
The "Chicago Tribute" Newspaper reported that Whites also
used private airplanes to drop kerosene and dynamite on
Black homes. By the next morning the entire Greenwood
district was reduced to ashes and not one White was even
accused of any wrongdoing, much less arrested.”
http://www.cnn.com/US/9908/03/tulsa.riots.probe/
http://www.northtulsa.com/tulsa_burning.html
***************
A new analysis of Census 2000 shows that more blacks,
Hispanics and Asians are living in the suburbs — areas
still largely dominated by whites. But they're continuing to
live apart from whites, forming suburban versions of the
racial and ethnic enclaves that have shaped cities for
much of the past century.
***************
But the study of suburban segregation revealed something
else: More affluent minorities are choosing to live among
themselves.
"Segregation doesn't necessarily speak to bias and
discrimination in all cases," says William Boone, political
science professor at Clark Atlanta University. "Sometimes,
people make a rational choice."
Choice is what created many black suburban enclaves
around Atlanta. Some of them are among the most affluent
black neighborhoods in the country. In DeKalb County,
subdivisions of million-dollar homes are being developed
by blacks for blacks.
Stone Mountain, which has 175 homes, was built in 1994.
The subdivision is now 85% black, 10% Hispanic and 5%
Asian.
In the past, blacks had to move to white neighborhoods to
find good homes, good schools, low crime and better public
services. That is no longer true.
The same pattern is being set for Hispanics.
I am not saying this is necessarily a good thing, but it does
belie your insistence on black or Hispanic neighborhoods
having high crime rates simply because they have a
predominantly minority population.
COL. RSJ
wrote:
>"I. M. Stupid" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:cson6f$s4a$0...@pita.alt.net...
>>
>> <Ray_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1106231139.7...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> > big macbeth wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> problem with king were not his poltiical tactics which were
>> > justifiable
>> >> given the times. but, the notion that he was some kind of a saint is
>> >> bullshit.
>> >> yet, his effectiveness was founded on his presumed saintliness. so,
>> >> that he was a faker means something.
>> >
>> > I think the record would show that King's "sainthood" was based on his
>> > advocacy of non-violence.
>> >
>> > His personal, sexual, life was his and, IMO, not the public's. There
>> > is a regretful tendency today to exaggerate the importance of sexual
>> > matters, e.g. Jefferson's having had a black consort. This merely
>> > denigrates the real accomplishments they brought to our culture.
>> >
>> > ray
>> >
>>
>>
>> Shall we overlook his plagiarism, women-beating, lying, cheating,
>communist
>> ties, and his overall acting like the typical NIGGER as well? Or is that
>> also a requirement of your political correctness agenda?
>>
>>
>> --
>> What NIGGERS are missing leaves the NIGGERS without an ability to think
>> about what NIGGERS are missing.
>>
>> Therefore, NIGGERS need not respond.
>>
>> I. M. White
>>
>
>Such hate and fear...what a sad and pathetic way to live.
>
You failed to address his points. Guess you lost this one.
--
So I sit and write and ponder, while the house is deaf
and dumb. Seeing visions over yonder of the war I know
must come. In the corner-not a vision-but a sign of
coming days, stands a box of ammunition, and a rifle
in green baize. And in this, the living present, let
the word go through the land. Every tradesman, clerk
and peasant, should have these two things at hand. No,
no ranting song is needed, and no meeting, flag or
fuss-In the future, still unheeded, shall the Spirit
come to us. Without feathers, drum or riot, on the
day that is to be. We shall march down very quiet,
to our stations by the sea. While the bitter parties
stifle every voice that warns of war. Every man should
have a rifle. And cartridges in store. (Henry Lawson)
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Bob LeChevalier
>"Bob LeChevalier" <loj...@lojban.org> wrote in message
>news:ecu0v0lr5eiei3pe2...@4ax.com...
>> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Your signature illustrates your race hatred, and everything else you
>>>> write
>>>> clearly illustrates your fears and insecurities.
>>>
>>>Are opinions the best you can offer as a defense against the abhorrent
>>>behavior of NIGGERS? Once again, show where I posted "race hatred, fear,
>>>and
>>>insecurities"
>
>> The fact that you find it worth your time to post your nonsense
>> betrays your racial hatred, fear, and insecurities.
>
>Much like you found it worth YOUR time to post the above opinion?
I have no problem admitting that I hate your abhorrent ideas, and
consider those who post them to be subhuman slime by choice.
>And if what I
>post is "nonsense" as you claim, why is it you are never able to refute it
>with anything more than your unsubstantiated opinion,
It is your unsubstantiated opinion that anything you post is relevant
to the real world.
Bob LeChevalier
>"Bob LeChevalier" <loj...@lojban.org> wrote in message
>news:39u0v05kjqkfi1npp...@4ax.com...
>> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>What would you say if a Liberal "social scientist" told you to
>jump into a pool filled with five hundred ravenous piranhas?
>
>If you valued your life, you'd certainly refuse the invitation.
That would be "fear", which was one of the things you denied.
>But what if the Liberal "social scientist" tried to convince you
>to go ahead and jump in, with the argument that "not all of the
>piranhas are aggressive. Some of them probably just want to make
>friends with you, and really aren't hungry either. To say that a
>piranha is going to attack you, just because he's a piranha, is a
>wicked stereotype, and probably contributes to the piranhas'
>negative feelings about you."
>
>If that argument was made to you, would you then jump into the
>pool filled with piranhas? I don't think so.
That would be "insecurity", which was one of the things you denied.
Remember that you are also a member of the same species as the
piranha, and the piranhas who seem quite secure in themselves seem to
survive quite well in the pool with each other.
>"You're out of your mind!" you reply. "Piranhas may be fine in
>the Amazon jungle, but you're crazy if you think we can live and
>associate with them every day. We and they just don't belong
>together - and if you're so in love with piranhas, why don't YOU
>go on a little swim with them? And if you think I'm going to
>waste my money and time feeding them and helping them multiply
>just so they can eat me and my family alive at some time in the
>future, Mr. Genius social scientist, then you've got another
>think coming!" With that you kick his delicate carcass
>downstairs.
Aggressive and hate-filled, you are. You are at least as nasty a
piranha as the ones you hate.
daSnoopy
diversity is the greatest thing?
We would like to know this first.
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
news:0GVHd.1082$Fm....@fe03.lga...
> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:csp5ln$fml$0...@pita.alt.net...
>>
>> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
>> news:l0UHd.1060$CZ6...@fe03.lga...
>> > "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > news:csp129$vc6$0...@pita.alt.net...
>>
>>
>>
>> >> > Such hate and fear...what a sad and pathetic way to live.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Explain how exposing the truth equates to "hate and fear".
>> >
>> > "The truth" is that you're afraid of people who are different than you
>> > are.
>> > That's the basis for most racism and genocide.
>>
>>
>> Do show where I made any mention of my being "afraid" of any one
>> different
>> than myself. Exactly what part of the truth that I posted are you afraid
> of?
>> Or is your brainwashed mind just operating on autopilot by spewing what
> you
>> were told to think?
>>
>>
>> --
>
> You don't have to say you're afraid. The fact you're posting such
> nonsense
> clearly illustrates your fears.
>
> BTW - You didn't answer my question...do you still live with your parents?
daSnoopy
limo-liberals that keep making excuses for the failed culture of your voter
blocks.
Are you a member of the Democrapic party by chance, living in that guarded
gated community with your Harvard .EDU bumper stickers?
Real life isn't as plain and simple as you describe. Since you like to
analyze others, I will analyze you.
You never worked hard, your parents paid for your education and this "guilt
trip" of being born with everything made you feel sorry for the "little
abused guy". However, due to your liberalism the protected people you seem
to favor are those causing the most problems. To fix these problems, you
enjoy using other peoples money and supporting laws that discriminate upon
one group or another. Since you never had to compete in the real world
(thanks to Dad) you can insure the protected little groups get ahead over
those that live in the real world (which you hate).
This gives you a sense and purpose because of the guilt you feel, this also
allows you power and control over others because you can gather enough
handout votes during election time to stay in power.
In a few minutes your little world could come crashing down upon you, I
would like to see this happen.
Then I would like to hear you make excuses for those protected groups that
you are now making excuses for.
I would like to see you compete in the real world, and live outside your
guarded communities. Maybe you can serve in the military to learn diversity
first hand? I know that is asking too much for you type of people, but give
it a try instead of being the protector of failed culture, criminals and
low-life's.
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
news:tMYHd.1930$1b3...@fe03.lga...
> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> spewed forth with more anger
> and
> hate in message news:cspkbh$78h$0...@pita.alt.net...
>>
>> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
>> news:0GVHd.1082$Fm....@fe03.lga...
>>
>>
>
> You sound like a very angry person...is that working for you? Does it
> make
> you feel more powerful to feel such anger? That whole "us vs. them" thing
> is very seductive when you have nothing going for you...it's been used for
> centuries to enlist young men into committing acts of violence (whether
> justified or not).
>
> Like many extremists (including most Muslim fundamentalists), I suspect
> you
> are a young male, with few prospects, probably still living at home, and
> not
> getting laid enough (if at all). Hopefully, as you mature and acquire
> some
> power and resources for yourself (a job, a car, a girl, etc.), you'll put
> aside your juvenile fantasies of "racial purity", and the hate that comes
> with it.
>
> BTW - there are clearly many significant problems (crime, poverty, etc.)
> in
> the black community - even Bill Cosby agrees with that. But, the anger
> and
> race hatred that you spew reflects much more on your own inner fears and
> insecurities.
>
> GG
daSnoopy
Why don't all of you numb-nuts answer the questions that he has mentioned
about crime and other issues of that particular racial group?
You cannot, or refuse to address these issues. So the common tactic is to
redirect the argument into a personal attack or a character issue.
However, I know what kind of people you are too.
You are the excuse makers that let these problems brew in America for so
many years that a full race war is a few years away.
What will you do if this happens? Will you leave your guarded communities?
Stand with the poor abused Black man in the Ghetto?
Will you drive thru the next LA riot offering service to the poor
misunderstood Black man who has been oppressed for so long?
I don't think so, you will be on the first plane of liberals out of the
country.
I understand you, just as much as you claim to understand those that speak
the ugly truth.
"Tom" <gian...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106257992.9...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> I. M. White wrote:
>> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
>> news:l0UHd.1060$CZ6...@fe03.lga...
>> > "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > news:csp129$vc6$0...@pita.alt.net...
>>
>>
>>
>> >> > Such hate and fear...what a sad and pathetic way to live.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Explain how exposing the truth equates to "hate and fear".
>> >
>> > "The truth" is that you're afraid of people who are different than
> you
>> > are.
>> > That's the basis for most racism and genocide.
>>
>>
>> Do show where I made any mention of my being "afraid" of any one
> different
>> than myself. Exactly what part of the truth that I posted are you
> afraid of?
>> Or is your brainwashed mind just operating on autopilot by spewing
> what you
>> were told to think?
>>
>>
>> --
>> What NIGGERS are missing leaves the NIGGERS without an ability to
> think
>> about what NIGGERS are missing.
>>
>> Therefore, NIGGERS need not respond.
>>
>> I. M. White
>
> Essentially your cowardice in not posting under your real name says all
> that it needs to say to me. That you're a sniveling little person who
> hates things that are not like himself, or herself. With a Usenet
> name like I.M. White, that says it all to me. You're probably a
> racist with a cloak and a hood in the closet at your house, but would
> wet your pants were you to reveal who you really are. People like you
> always hide behind masks. Why the anonymity if you believe in this
> vile retchedness that you spew forth into the world making it a less
> peaceful place to live?
>
> Tom
GaryG
news:41f2969f$1...@news6.uncensored-news.com...
> Yea and Bill Cosby has been called every name in the book by you
> limo-liberals that keep making excuses for the failed culture of your
voter
> blocks.
I've not called Bill Cosby anything but a funny, sincere man, who is also
courageous enough to address the problems that he sees. But, unlike "white
power" pinheads, he addresses those problems in an intelligent manner,
without resorting to the juvenile de-humanizing of racism.
>
> Are you a member of the Democrapic party by chance, living in that guarded
> gated community with your Harvard .EDU bumper stickers?
I'm currently a registered Republican, but I've been both a Democrat and a
Libertarian in the past. I attended a small state college, and live in a
small town that is quite conservative.
>
> Real life isn't as plain and simple as you describe. Since you like to
> analyze others, I will analyze you.
>
> You never worked hard, your parents paid for your education and this
"guilt
> trip" of being born with everything made you feel sorry for the "little
> abused guy". However, due to your liberalism the protected people you
seem
> to favor are those causing the most problems. To fix these problems, you
> enjoy using other peoples money and supporting laws that discriminate upon
> one group or another. Since you never had to compete in the real world
> (thanks to Dad) you can insure the protected little groups get ahead over
> those that live in the real world (which you hate).
Not even close. I own a small business, and I work my ass off (about 60
hours this week, and counting). I'm a firm believer in the capitalist
system, and don't use anyone else's money other than my own.
Perhaps you've been listening to Rush, or some of the other brain-dead talk
shows recently, because you seem to assume that anyone who is in favor of
tolerance must be some sort of effete liberal snob. In the real world, it's
not that unusual for conservative business owners to be in favor of social
tolerance.
> This gives you a sense and purpose because of the guilt you feel, this
also
> allows you power and control over others because you can gather enough
> handout votes during election time to stay in power.
>
> In a few minutes your little world could come crashing down upon you, I
> would like to see this happen.
You seem quite angry...are you a disempowered, unloved, hate-filled kid who
still lives at home and can't find a job?
GaryG
> Attack the person and not the issues, typical liberal tactic.
> Why don't all of you numb-nuts answer the questions that he has mentioned
> about crime and other issues of that particular racial group?
>
> You cannot, or refuse to address these issues. So the common tactic is to
> redirect the argument into a personal attack or a character issue.
>
> However, I know what kind of people you are too.
>
> You are the excuse makers that let these problems brew in America for so
> many years that a full race war is a few years away.
Would you like that?
FWIW, the white power pinheads have been predicting a "race war" for many,
many years (I heard that same kind of talk by the "survivalists" back in the
70's). It helps to sell pamphlets and books to simple-minds, but the truth
is it won't happen.
>
> What will you do if this happens? Will you leave your guarded
communities?
> Stand with the poor abused Black man in the Ghetto?
>
> Will you drive thru the next LA riot offering service to the poor
> misunderstood Black man who has been oppressed for so long?
>
>
> I don't think so, you will be on the first plane of liberals out of the
> country.
>
> I understand you, just as much as you claim to understand those that speak
> the ugly truth.
Your words betray you...they clearly reveal your fears and your anger. Do
you hate yourself?
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
\
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/index466.htm
---------------------------------------------
In the U.S., 1 out of every 3 black men will serve prison time. Further,
nearly half of all prisoners are reconvicted of other crimes after being
released from prison.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm
"Based on current rates of first incarceration, an estimated 32% of black
males will enter State or Federal prison during their lifetime, compared to
17% of Hispanic males and 5.9% of white males."
That doesn't include the number of negroes who will commit crimes and be
sentenced to probation. Factoring in that, over 50% of all black males are
criminals. (Can you really blame people who don't want to be around
blacks, or have them in their neighborhoods?)
In the U.S., whites outnumber blacks 6 to 1, yet blacks commit more murders
by total number.
In 2002, whites (and hispanics) committed 5,356 murders. Blacks committed
5,579 murders. Blacks only represtent 13% of the general population. This
demonstrates the savagery of the black man.
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_02/xl/02tbl2-6.xls
(White and hispanic crime stats are lumped together for reporting purposes
to make black crime look less bad.)
In 2002, whites AND hispanics (the federal government lumps white and
hispanic crime data together so it is higher and makes blacks look less bad
by comparison) accounted for 70.7% of all arrests. Blacks accounted for
26.9% of all arrests, overrepresented by a factor of two. (Notice 70.7% +
26.9% = 97.6%, thus proving hispanics are lumped together with whites).
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_02/pdf/4sectionfour.pdf
(Page 232)
In 2002, 34% of all arrests for FORCIBLE RAPE were for black offenders.
Blacks only represent 13% of the population. Blacks are almost 3 times as
likely to rape as whites and hispanics together.
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_02/pdf/4sectionfour.pdf
(Page 252, table 43)
http://www.rit.edu/~jmkgcj/May%2019%201999.html
"A study in Baltimore found that on any given day nearly 60 percent of
all young black men were either in prison, in jail, awaiting trial, on
probation, or on parole. Other studies say that 90 percent of non-white
males living in urban areas will be arrested and jailed for at least
brief periods."
Sure, we can look at mother Africa and see how blacks live without the
"oppression" and "racism" of the white man. You will find nothing but
rampant crime and baby rape. Yes, grown black men raping babies.
http://newsearch.iac.iafrica.com/iafrica/search.html?search=baby%20rape
I won't even discuss African's second favorite pastime: spreading AIDS.
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/cctimes/news/7353931.htm
Sure, a completely preventable disease is being spread with abandon. But
why is that? Afterall, we're all equal, right? Intelligent people don't
spread deadly, preventable diseases, do we?
The sad thing is that the idiot democrats are willing and pandering
accomplises in the societal degradation caused by black people.
Hell, with all the welfare recipients in the black population, it is no
surprise that 80% or more of blacks vote for Democrats, now is it?
Democrats: the party of the idiots and dregs of society.
Oh, sure. Some Libs might spew the word "racist" at me. However, that
word has been overused. It has no power except against liberals
themselves. Anyone with common sense is immune to it.
Come on liberals, try to refute any evidence I have provided. You won't.
Because you can't.
Oh, and black crime isn't just an American problem. It's a problem
everywhere blacks live:
As a matter of fact, in England, blacks represent 2.5% of the general
population. Yet, they comprise 12% of the prison population.
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/r154.pdf
Black crime is destroying London:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1420330.stm
"Soul singer Mica Paris has joined forces with police in London to launch
an advertising campaign to stop shootings within the black community."
http://www.iansa.org/oldsite/news/2001/dec_01/london_murders.htm
"The 16 murders involving black gangsters fighting for control of
London's crack cocaine market represent a leap of 77 per cent."
"Commander Alan Brown, head of the Operation Trident *taskforce against
"black on black" gun crime*, described the increases as "an extremely
worrying development".
Since the Democrats started their negro-loving policies and welfare
programs, the American black family has been decimated.
http://www.ncpa.org/ea/eaja94/eaja94h.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Welfare now absorbs 5 percent of the gross national product (GNP), up from
1.5 percent in 1965 when President Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty began.
But in most respects, the problems of the poor have grown worse, not
better, in that time.
In 1992, total welfare spending by federal, state and local governments
reached a record high of $304.6 billion.
(***Yeah, and the fucking liberals are bitching about $87 billion for Iraq.
Ten years ago were were spending $300 BILLION per year on welfare. I'll
bet it's $500 BILLION now.)
The black out-of-wedlock birth rate was 68 percent in 1991- up from 28
percent in 1965 - and the white out-of-wedlock birth rate was 22 percent.
One of the most visible and dramatic consequences of family breakup is the
increase in crime. Research shows:
The greater the percentage of single-parent families with children in a
neighborhood, the higher the rates of violent crime and burglary.
In striking contrast, the percentage of low-income families in a
neighborhood is unrelated to the crime rate.
(DUH!!!)
Growing up in a single-parent family in a neighborhood with many other
single-parent families on welfare triples the probability that a young
black man will engage in criminal activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
THANKS FOR RUINING AMERICA DEMOCRATS!!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.soc.umn.edu/~samaha/cj6e/ch03_you_decide_robbery_racist.htm
Consider these two quotes by distinguished Black Americans
If I'm walking down a street in Center City Philadelphia at two in the
morning and I hear some footsteps behind me and I turn around and there are
a couple of young white dudes behind me, I am probably not going to get
very uptight. I'm probably not going to have the same reaction if I turn
around and there is the proverbial Black urban youth behind me. Now if I am
going to have this reaction-and I'm a Black male who has studied marshal
arts for twenty some odd years and can defend myself-I can't help but think
that the average white judge in the situation will have a reaction that is
ten times more intense. Judge Theodore A. McKee, U.S. Third Circuit Court
of Appeals.(Kennedy 1998:16)
There is nothing more painful for me at this stage in my life than to walk
down the street and hear footsteps and start to think about robbery and
then look around and see it's somebody white and feel relieved.
The Reverend Jesse Jackson. (Kennedy 1998, 16)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.fumento.com/greatsociety.html
You see, not even blacks like blacks. Blacks are nothing but trouble, and
THEY know it. Yet, the Democrats are bending over and kissing their asses
every step of the way.
Who's yer daddy, boy?!
King of SCAA
----------------------------------------------
I. M. White
> spa...@nogood.com wrote:
More opinions void of substantiated fact from a proven liar. No surprise
there.
Liberal Strategy 101
1. If the message doesn't serve your purpose, attack the messenger.
2. If the messenger makes a fool of you, attack the source.
3. If the source can't be manipulated to suit your position, lie, lie, .ie!
You are textbook 101, booby!
I. M. White
"Bob LeChevalier" <loj...@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:n0m2v0h942tesrkbo...@4ax.com...
> spa...@nogood.com wrote:
Evasion noted.
I. M. White
> Aggressive and hate-filled, you are. You are at least as nasty a
> piranha as the ones you hate.
There you go lying again to suit your purpose, booby. Do show where I made
any mention of "hating" anyone. Fact is, I don't hate NIGGERS any more than
I hate any other wild animal; I just know how violent they are and act
accordingly.
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
Evasion noted.
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
<snipped evasion>
Unless you are troll with no purpose in life, even the most liberal
niggerphile is unable to dispute the facts against NIGGERS. That is why
there is so much pressure from them to hide the truth.
I. M. White
> I have no problem admitting that I hate your abhorrent ideas, and
> consider those who post them to be subhuman slime by choice.
Then by your own definition, you are a self-described bigot. Thanks for
clearing that up!
GaryG
>
> "GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:xEeId.5949$893....@fe03.lga...
>
>
>
>
> <snipped>
>
> niggerphile is unable to dispute the facts against NIGGERS. That is why
> there is so much pressure from them to hide the truth.
>
Evasion duly noted.
>
> --
> What RACISTS are missing leaves the RACISTS without an ability to think
> about what RACISTS are missing.
>
> Therefore, RACISTS need not respond.
>
> I. M. Dim
>
>
Bob LeChevalier
>news:jhp3v0lvhm596kqa5...@4ax.com...
>
>> I have no problem admitting that I hate your abhorrent ideas, and
>> consider those who post them to be subhuman slime by choice.
>
>Then by your own definition, you are a self-described bigot.
But my "bigotry" is not against anything inherent in *you*, but
against your expressed choices and words. It is not considered
immoral to find ideas and expressions abhorrent; it is abhorrent to
judge people based on irrelevant traits, and not by their words and
deeds.
Bob LeChevalier
Which means that the majority of black men and thus the typical black
man is at least as good as you in this matter (since we don't in fact
know that you also haven't served prison time).
>Come on liberals, try to refute any evidence I have provided. You won't.
>Because you can't.
It is not clear what you mean by "refute". No one is going to bother
trying to prove that your claimed factoids are false. They might be
true. The issue is whether the factoids mean anything with respect to
the conclusions you wish to reach. That is refuted simply by
rejecting your racist assumptions that they are important (for indeed
they are nothing but assumptions on your part, and they are clearly
selected by you in order to reach your conclusion).
Bob LeChevalier
>news:enp3v0duvktokdojd...@4ax.com...
>
>> Aggressive and hate-filled, you are. You are at least as nasty a
>> piranha as the ones you hate.
>
>There you go lying again to suit your purpose, booby. Do show where I made
>any mention of "hating" anyone. Fact is, I don't hate NIGGERS any more than
>I hate any other wild animal; I just know how violent they are and act
>accordingly.
You wrote:
>Are opinions the best you can offer as a defense against the abhorrent
^^^^^^^^^
>behavior of NIGGERS?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Main Entry: ab搬or斟ent
>1 a archaic : strongly opposed b : feeling or showing abhorrence
>2 : not agreeable : CONTRARY <a notion abhorrent to their philosophy>
>3 : being so repugnant as to stir up positive antagonism <acts abhorrent to every right-minded person>
^^^^^^^^^
>Main Entry: re搆ug搖ant
>1 : INCOMPATIBLE, INCONSISTENT
>2 archaic : HOSTILE
>3 : exciting distaste or aversion
^^^^^^^^
>Main Entry: 1hate
>1 a : intense hostility and aversion usually deriving from fear, anger, or sense of
^^^^^^^^
>injury b : extreme dislike or antipathy : LOATHING <had a great hate of hard work>
You therefore have determined to hate "behaviors" and you have chosen
to associate those behaviors with their race indicating that you think
that race determines those behaviors. This makes you a racist:
>Main Entry: rac搏sm
>1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
>2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
I find YOUR attitudes abhorrent, so it is fair to say that I "hate"
them. But I don't think that they are based on your race or indeed on
anything inherent in your makeup, but rather because you have chosen
to be a subhuman racist slime. Since I would not know you on the
street outside your Usenet persona, I cannot claim to hate YOU as a
person. I merely pity and laugh at you for your sad and ineffectual
posturings. And they are posturings because it is safe to say that
you know that no one who doesn't already agree with you is going to be
convinced by your postings.
Bob LeChevalier
You are subhuman racist slime 101.
I. M. White
> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Bob LeChevalier" <loj...@lojban.org> wrote in message
>>news:jhp3v0lvhm596kqa5...@4ax.com...
>>
>>> I have no problem admitting that I hate your abhorrent ideas, and
>>> consider those who post them to be subhuman slime by choice.
>>
>>Then by your own definition, you are a self-described bigot.
>
> But my "bigotry" is not against anything inherent in *you*, but
> against your expressed choices and words. It is not considered
> immoral to find ideas and expressions abhorrent; it is abhorrent to
> judge people based on irrelevant traits, and not by their words and
> deeds.
"irrelevant traits"????? Is that what you liberals are calling the savage
criminal behavior of NIGGERS nowadays? I would beg to differ that the
victims of typical NIGGER behavior would view it as "irrelevant traits"
http://www.wichita-massacre.com/
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=1912
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a5ed080584a.htm
You seem to find it easier to attack the messenger than deal with what they
say. Truth is truth regardless of who says it.
Unfortunately, you've been swilling bilge water supplied by the mainstream
media for so long you're no longer able to recognize the truth.
I. M. White
More opinions void of substantiated fact from a proven liar. No surprise
there.
Liberal Strategy 101
1. If the message doesn't serve your purpose, attack the messenger.
2. If the messenger makes a fool of you, attack the source.
3. If the source can't be manipulated to suit your position, lie, lie, .ie!
You are textbook 101, booby!
GaryG
> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >"Bob LeChevalier" <loj...@lojban.org> wrote in message
> >news:jhp3v0lvhm596kqa5...@4ax.com...
> >
> >> I have no problem admitting that I hate your abhorrent ideas, and
> >> consider those who post them to be subhuman slime by choice.
> >
> >Then by your own definition, you are a self-described bigot.
>
> But my "bigotry" is not against anything inherent in *you*, but
> against your expressed choices and words. It is not considered
> immoral to find ideas and expressions abhorrent; it is abhorrent to
> judge people based on irrelevant traits, and not by their words and
> deeds.
Well said...one can only hope his simple mind can comprehend it.
I. M. White
More opinions void of substantiated fact from a proven liar. No surprise
there.
Liberal Strategy 101
1. If the message doesn't serve your purpose, attack the messenger.
2. If the messenger makes a fool of you, attack the source.
3. If the source can't be manipulated to suit your position, lie, lie, .ie!
You are textbook 101, booby!
I. M. White
> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>In the U.S., 1 out of every 3 black men will serve prison time.
>
> Which means that the majority of black men and thus the typical black
> man is at least as good as you in this matter (since we don't in fact
> know that you also haven't served prison time).
Less than 6% of the population (male blacks) is responsible for over 50% of
the violent crime in this country. And you defend this?
Including blacks that are under court supervision but not incarcerated are
not included in the numbers that I provided. However, being you now wish to
debate crime ratios to whites, per capita, NIGGERS are vastly over
represented in illicit behavior than whites as shown below.
The following compliments of Tom Shelly:
Absolutely shocking statistics the liberals, niggers, and niggerphiles
DON"T want you to see:
Here are some more shocking statistics:
More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year.
Blacks murder Whites at 18 times the rate Whites murder Blacks.
About 1 million Whites were murdered, robbed, assaulted, or raped by
Blacks
in 1992.
In the last 30 years, 170 million violent and nonviolent crimes were
committed by Blacks against Whites in the U.S.
Blacks under 18 are more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for
murder
than Whites the same age.
Some 90% of the victims of race crimes are Whites.
Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than Whites,
although they comprise only one-seventh of the White population.
On a per-capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crimes than
Whites.
Some 27 million nonviolent crimes were committed in the U.S. in 1992
alone.
31% of the robberies involved Black offenders and White victims; only 2%
involved White offenders and Black victims.
1.3 million of the 6.6 million violent crimes committed in the U.S. each
year are interracial.
Between 1964 and 1994, more than 45,000 people were killed in
interracial
murders in the U.S., compared to 58,000 Americans killed in Vietnam and
38,000 killed in Korea.
The above stats were collected by an Australian reporter, Neil Sheehan,
who
dug out half-concealed U.S. crime figures for an article in the Sydney
Morning Herald (May 2, 1995). The contents of his article, he commented,
could not possibly be published or discussed in the U.S. mainstream
media.
One wonders how many Whites have to be killed by Blacks before the N.Y.
Times and Dan Rather break the conspiratorial silence about the number
of
White casualties in the guerrilla war being waged against them by
Blacks.
Paved With Good Intentions, a book by Jared Taylor, also studies crime
statistics by race. It must be stressed that Blacks make up only 12% of
the
population according to the 1990 U.S. census (and Black males about 6%),
but
they commit a vastly disproportionate number of violent crime.
Mr. Taylor reveals: 1) 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are
Blacks.
2) 46% of all arrests for violent crimes are Blacks. 3) 73% of all
"justified self-defense" killings are committed by Blacks. 4) 60.5% of
all
Blacks are armed with some type of weapon at all times. 5) 98% of all
youths
arrested for gun fights in Atlanta are Blacks.
According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime
victims, more than 6.6 million
violent crimes (murder, rape, assault and robbery) are committed in the
US each year, of which about
20 per cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.
* Most victims of race crime - about 90 per cent - are white, according
to the survey "Highlights
from 20 Years of Surveying Crime Victims", published in 1993.
* Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed, assaulted or
raped by black Americans in
1992, compared with about 132,000 blacks who were murdered, robbed,
assaulted or raped by whites,
according to the same survey.
* Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes than
whites even though the
black population is only one-seventh the size of the white population.
When these figures are
adjusted on a per capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity:
blacks are committing more
than 50 times the number of violent racial crimes of whites.
* According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal Bureau
of Investigation, most
inter-racial murders involve black assailants and white victims, with
blacks murdering whites at 18
times the rate that whites murder blacks.
http://www.stormfront.org/crusader/texts/bt/bt06.html
"Blacks are as much more likely to be arrested for violent crimes as men
are
more likely to be arrested than women. To the extent that arrest rates
are a
good indication of actual criminal behavior - and there is very strong
evidence that they are - blacks are as much more dangerous than whites
as
men are more dangerous than women. If people feel more threatened by
unknown
men than by unknown women and ar justified in taking additional
precautions
against them, from a statistical point of view, they are equally
justified
in making the same distinctions between blacks and whites." (New Century
Foundation, "The Color of Crime," 1998, p.1)
Wanna check for yourself? http://www.amren.com/color.pdf
While the Census Bureau often categorizes real Whites separately from
mestizos, the FBI and the Justice
Department usually do not. The law-enforcement agencies of the federal
government lump together
crimes committed by Whites, mestizos, Arabs, Jews, various North
Africans and Middle Easterners, and
certain Filipinos into the same category, deceptively labeled "Whites,"
skewing the apparent White crime
total upwards. When the FBI reports a percentage of crimes as having
"White" perpetrators, we must
keep in mind that the report refers to the combination of Whites and
these others, who together formed
about 84% of the US population in 1995. To prevent confusion between
real Whites and all those whom
the FBI calls "Whites," we will put the category of FBI "Whites" in
quotation marks.
The FBI Uniform Crime Reports are available on the Internet at
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr.htm. In one of
these reports, titled Crime in the United States, 1995, we can draw
several interesting conclusions
from Table 2.8. In 1995, there were 10032 US murders having a single
perpetrator and a single victim.
Of these murders, Blacks committed 5175 (51.6%) and "Whites" committed
4476 (44.6%). The Black
per capita murder perpetration rate was over seven times higher than the
"White" rate. There were at
least 1303 interracial murders (13.0% of total murders), of which 753
were committed by Blacks
(57.8% of interracial murders) and 352 were committed by "Whites"
(27.0%). The Black per capita
interracial murder perpetration rate was about fourteen times higher
than that for "Whites." There were
699 murders in which Blacks killed "Whites" (53.6% of interracial
murders) and 281 murders in which
"Whites" killed Blacks (21.6%). The average Black was 16.4 times more
likely to kill a "White" than the
reverse. How does that square with what you heard in television news
reports during the same period?
And what does that tell you about the media?
A well-known, but little examined, publication is Statistical Abstract
of the United States, 1996,
which is available on the Internet at
http://www.census.gov/prod/2/gen/96statab/96statab.html or can be
purchased at a bookstore under the title The American Almanac 1995-1996.
Several tables of data in
this publication contain racial information that is generally unknown by
the American public, though
usually data from two or more tables must be brought together in order
for the racial significance to
become clear. For example, when the racially resolved populations of
major US cities are taken from
Table 46 and correlated with the per capita murder rates of the same
cities taken from Table 311, it
becomes clear that cities that, in 1995, were nearly all-White had
relatively very few murders (e.g.,
Mesa, Anchorage, St. Paul, Colorado Springs) and that the per capita
murder rate rises with increasing
percentages of non-Whites (Miami, Los Angeles, Newark), especially
Blacks (Detroit, Atlanta,
Baltimore, St. Louis, Birmingham, New Orleans). It is interesting that
the government publication had no
special table to permit someone to more easily appreciate that fact.
Table 2.6 in Crime in the United States, 1995, contains murder rates
that are broken down by both
race and age. When this information is correlated with the racially
resolved US population data in Table
24 of Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1996, we can determine
that Blacks in any age group
are more likely to commit murder than "Whites" of the same age. In fact,
there is no age group for
which the Black per capita murder perpetration rate is low enough to be
"merely" triple the
"White" rate. If you feel up to doing interpolations and more UCR file
downloading, you can determine
that the fact expressed by the previous sentence holds true for 1996,
1997 and 1998 (latest available
figures), as well as for 1995.
Liberals often try to blame Black violence on poverty. The Census data,
however, disproves that
hypothesis. How? In 1995, among the American poor, there were 16.3
million Whites (real ones), 10.0
million Blacks, 8.6 million "Hispanics," and 1.4 million Asians. Blacks
comprised about 27.6% of the
American poor. Those poverty numbers can be verified at
http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/pov95/povest1.html. During that year,
Blacks committed about
54% of all US murders. Remember that the FBI, from whom the murder
information comes, counts
"Hispanics" as "Whites," making the total number of poor persons
eligible to be committing murders as
"Whites" about 24.8 million. These "Whites" comprised 68.5% of the
American poor, but committed -
at most - only 46% of 1995 US murders, if we make the doubtful
assumption that Asians and
Amerindians committed none. The evidence argues against the liberal
hypothesis that poverty causes
crime.
Indeed, the US Department of Justice states baldly, "Racial differences
exist." at
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm. The BJS recently also
began to publicize the fact that
Blacks are 7 times more likely than Whites to "commit homicide," in
addition to their earlier statement that
Blacks are 6 times more likely to "be murdered" than Whites. Even
allowing for the slight language bias
with respect to the use of the words "homicide" and "murder,"* that is a
remarkable departure from
"political correctness" for a federal government agency to permit
itself.
*Not every homicide is a murder, however the Bureau of Justice
Statistics would have no official interest in justifiable homicides, as
these are not crimes, and it would have limited interest in accidental
homicides, as these are often not crimes, though they may be the
occasion for action by civil courts.
Sometimes, after liberals see their "poverty causes crime" hypothesis go
down in flames, they shift over to
a kind of "class envy" argument. Suddenly, it isn't primal necessity
that drives all those poor Blacks to
crime - it's envy instead, for which of course the Black murderers
should not bE blamed. In the rural
areas, the liberals say, people are spread out and rich and poor don't
necessarily have to interact. But in
the cities, the economic differences are more visible, and so more
likely to incite violence, and hence the
liberals give us the "degree of urbanization" hypothesis to explain
Black violence. In the preceding graph,
the US states and the District of Columbia are positioned according to
their respective percentages of
Blacks and mestizos in the resident population. It is rather easy to see
that the Whitest states have the
lowest rates for violent crime (murder, rape, armed robbery and
aggravated assault were considered in
making the graph). Somewhat higher rates of violence come with
increasing percentages of mestizos, but
the largest increase comes with increasing percentages of Blacks.
Anomalous points are probably the
result of anomalous situations, but the trend is clear.
Prior to 1986, Hispanics were classified as a distinct and separate
racial
group. Not anymore. The FBI and U.S. Census Bureau no longer distinguish
between Hispanics (who are actually Spanish speaking Indians for the
most
part) and Whites; their crimes are lumped together in one ethnic pot.
The 22,354,059 Hispanics living in the U.S. do not exist, at least not
in
the ethnic sense when it comes to the FBI compiling criminal statistics
for
mainstream and news organizations. Included by the FBI as "WHITES" are
not
only Hispanics, but also West Asians, Jews, Middle Easterners, North
Africans, Iranians, Iraquis, Libyans, Palestinians, and Jewish refugees
from
the former Soviet Union.
The question that immediately comes to mind is: "Why would the FBI and
the U
.S. Census Bureau classify persons of Hispanic origin as being white?"
The
answer might surprise you. The FBI and the U.S. Census Bureau, along
with
mainstream media purposely distort criminal statistics and conveniently
classify Mexican-Americans as white because they do not want the
American
public to know the truth--that Blacks are responsible for committing the
vast majority of crimes here in the United States.
For example, in 1993, there were 20,343 Americans murdered: Blacks, who
compromise 12 percent of the U.S. population, committed 11,686 or a
whopping
58 percent of those murders. The black murder rate was 38.8 per 100,000.
Based on their murder rate in 1986, Hispanics committed an estimated
2,242
murders in 1993. This is 10.7 per 100,000. 76 percent of the U.S. is
White
(European-American) and they committed only 29.5 percent of the murders.
On
the other hand, Black and Hispanic minorities combined constitute 21
percent
of the population, yet they committed a staggering 68.7 percent of the
murders in the U.S. during 1993.
This means, on a per capita basis, a Black person is 12.3 times as
likely to
commit murder as a White person. Since this information is not deemed
"politically correct" and would perhaps offend the black segment of
society,
it is offset by falsely inflating the per capita basis for whites by
backhandedly including Hispanics and other ethnic groups.
Here are some more shocking statistics:
More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year.
Blacks murder Whites at 18 times the rate Whites murder Blacks.
About 1 million Whites were murdered, robbed, assaulted, or raped by
Blacks
in 1992.
In the last 30 years, 170 million violent and nonviolent crimes were
committed by Blacks against Whites in the U.S.
Blacks under 18 are more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for
murder
than Whites the same age.
Some 90% of the victims of race crimes are Whites.
Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than Whites,
although they comprise only one-seventh of the White population.
On a per-capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crimes than
Whites.
Some 27 million nonviolent crimes were committed in the U.S. in 1992
alone.
31% of the robberies involved Black offenders and White victims; only 2%
involved White offenders and Black victims.
1.3 million of the 6.6 million violent crimes committed in the U.S. each
year are interracial.
Between 1964 and 1994, more than 45,000 people were killed in
interracial
murders in the U.S., compared to 58,000 Americans killed in Vietnam and
38,000 killed in Korea.
The above stats were collected by an Australian reporter, Neil Sheehan,
who
dug out half-concealed U.S. crime figures for an article in the Sydney
Morning Herald (May 2, 1995). The contents of his article, he commented,
could not possibly be published or discussed in the U.S. mainstream
media.
One wonders how many Whites have to be killed by Blacks before the N.Y.
Times and Dan Rather break the conspiratorial silence about the number
of
White casualties in the guerrilla war being waged against them by
Blacks.
Paved With Good Intentions, a book by Jared Taylor, also studies crime
statistics by race. It must be stressed that Blacks make up only 12% of
the
population according to the 1990 U.S. census (and Black males about 6%),
but
they commit a vastly disproportionate number of violent crime.
Mr. Taylor reveals: 1) 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are
Blacks.
2) 46% of all arrests for violent crimes are Blacks. 3) 73% of all
"justified self-defense" killings are committed by Blacks. 4) 60.5% of
all
Blacks are armed with some type of weapon at all times. 5) 98% of all
youths
arrested for gun fights in Atlanta are Blacks.
In 1989, the FBI reported the following:
A) Blacks commit 8 times more assaults than Whites.
B) Blacks commit 9 times more rapes than Whites.
C) Blacks commit 14 times more murders than Whites.
D) Blacks commit 19 times more armed robberies.
E) Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than White
neighborhoods.
F) There were 629,000 interracial attacks committed in 1985 (the last
year
the FBI "chose" to report this information). Some nine out of every ten
were
committed by Blacks against Whites.
G. Black males (6% of the population) make up 46% of the nation's prison
population.
Arrests by Race, 1993
The following statistics are contained within the Information Please
Almanac
1996, p. 853. The original source of this information is the Department
of
Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports for the
United States, 1993, released Dec. 4, 1994.
These statistics once again indicate that Blacks are committing a
grossly
disproportionate amount of the crimes. However, once again it should be
noted that the classification, "White," is very misleading because even
though Hispanics are not White and do not even consider themselves
White,
the FBI has chosen to include their crimes among those committed by
Whites.
As a consequence, crimes by White people are substantially less than the
numbers would otherwise indicate. In fact, the statistics below indicate
that White European people actually commit far fewer crimes
percentage-wise
than their percentage of the population.
I am the president of New Century Foundation, which Mr. Hutchinson says
is
behind "a full-blown national campaign to alert whites to
the danger of hate
crimes committed by blacks." In fact, we are interested in
inter-racial crime
of all kinds, of which officially-classified "hate crimes"
are an
insignificant percentage.
Among the findings we have reported but that the media are
deeply reluctant
to publicize:
* Blacks commit 90 percent Of the approximately 1,700,000
interracial crimes
of violence that occur in the United States every year, and
are more than 50
times more likely to commit violence against whites than
vice versa. In the
case of robbery, or "mugging," blacks are more than 200
times more likely to
attack whites than vice versa.
* There is actually more black-on-white than black-on-black
violence. When
blacks commit violent crime they target whites just over
half the time. When
whites commit violent crime, only two to three percent of
their victims are
black.
* High rates of anti-white violence cannot be explained by
arguing that
blacks are victimizing the people they think more likely to
have money. Only
15 percent of black-on-white violent crimes are robberies,
which have an
obvious monetary motive. The rest are simple and aggravated
assaults, rapes,
and murders--few of which are likely to have a monetary
motive.
* Blacks are twice as likely as whites to commit what are
officially
classified as hate crimes. The "white" rate is actually
inflated by a
misleading classification system in which Hispanics are a
victim category but
not a perpetrator category. The same Mexican who is a
"Hispanic" victim of a
hate crime becomes "white" if he is a perpetrator.
* Blacks are as much more likely than whites to commit
violent crime as men
are more likely than women--which, of course, is why there
is racial
profiling by the police (and by everyone else, for that
matter).
These findings and many more are explained in meticulously
documented detail
in our recent report, The Color of Crime. Ordering
information is on our web
page, www.AmRen.com.
We think it is important to understand the extent and
nature of inter-racial
crime, not for the reasons Mr. Hutchinson attributes to us
but because policy
should be based on knowledge rather than ignorance.
Jared Taylor, President
New Century Foundation
Oakton, VA
703 716-0900
JarTay...@aol.com
America's Victims - 12,000 Daily
American newspapers and TV endlessly run clips of the
regrettable incident
where four White policemen beat a Black.
To do this the media has to step over hundreds and
thousands of bodies of White
men, women and children to find a flyspeck on an
iceberg. Whites are virtually
ignored to concentrate on an incident in which a
Black is a victim.
It is media policy to conceal the criminal's race.
But, in spite of their "paper
curtain" - certain information still manages to slip
through.
Truth At Last, #353, P.O. Box 1211, Marietta, Georgia
30061 $15/yr, carried Pat
Buchanan's answer to the media's charge of White
"Hate crimes". They reported
Buchanan on May 7th as saying:
Blacks commit 8 times more assaults than do
Whites
Blacks commit 9 times more rapes than Whites
Blacks commit 14 times more murders
Blacks commit 19 times more armed robberies
Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent
than White communities.
There were 629,000 interracial attacks committed
in 1985. Some 9 out of
every 10 attacks were committed by Blacks
against Whites.
[ED: The actual figure is many, many times this
"official" figure. Most crime is
underreported and un-reported - unless it is violent
or involves a great deal of
money. Rape is seldom reported because the media
tries to print the victims
name - to discourage reporting. Vandalism and petty
theft is so commonplace as
to not be newsworthy, and reporting seldom produce
those guilty. The daily
beatings and robbery practiced against White children
in the public schools
cannot be reported because there is no way to protect
against retaliation.]
Blacks make up 12% of the population. Still, Blacks
make up 46% of the nation's
prison population. Nearly 1/4 of all Negroes ages 20
to 29 are either in prison, on
probation or on parole, which compares to 10% for
Hispanics and 6% for Whites.
Most interracial crime is overwhelmingly committed by
Blacks against Whites.
These figures in themselves present a different
picture from that the media would
have us believe, and, Buchanan merely touched on
Hispanic crime while leaving
out Oriental and Indian crime entirely. If total
"stranger-crime" were honestly
reported, we might be dumbfounded to discover that as
much as 85%-90% of all
crime in the United States is committed by strangers,
and much of it (if not most)
is committed against Whites.
About 250,000,000 people live in the U.S. Some 180
million are Westerners. A
one in ten victim rate produces 18 million crimes
against them yearly. If strangers
commit only half, this is 9,000,000. If half of them
are committed against Whites
it results in about 12,000 crimes committed against
Whites by strangers each
and every day.
Once again, the California incident where the Black
was beaten by White
policemen is regrettable, but, what about the more
than 5 million Whites who
have fallen victim to strangers since that incident
occurred? Don't any of the
rapes and cold blooded butcheries suffered by Whites
merit the same careful
tear-jerk treatment?
"One category is interracial crimes. Its most recent
publication (1997), "Criminal Victimization in the
U.S.," reports on data collected in 1994. In that year,
there were about 1,700,000 interracial crimes, of
which 1,276,030 involved whites and blacks. In 90
percent of the cases, a white was the victim and a
black was the perpetrator, while in 10 percent of the
cases it was the reverse."
"Another finding of the NCVS report is that of the
2,025,464 violent crimes committed by blacks in
1994, 1,140,670 were against whites -- that's slightly
over 56 percent. Whites committed 5,114,692 violent
crimes; 135,360, or 2.6 percent were against blacks."
BLACKS AND CRIME: Blacks are 12.1% of the US population, while American
Indians and Asians together are 3.5%. Thus,
the FBI's "Whites" [Includes Mexicans, Arabs, Jews, etc.] are the
remaining 84.4% of the population.. Blacks are 5.6 times as
likely to commit violent crimes as are "Whites." In other words, the
average Black is 460% more likely to attack someone than the
average "White" is. As compared to "Whites," Blacks are 4.5 times as
likely to rape, 5.2 times as likely to commit aggravated
assault, and 10.3 times as likely to commit armed robbery. If you had
read that Blacks were 30% more likely to be armed robbers
than "Whites," you might not have been surprised. In fact, Blacks are
930% more likely to be armed robbers. The 12% of the US
population that is Black commits 58% of the armed robberies.
In 1996 law enforcement agencies reported to the FBI that they arrested
14,439 murderers. Of these murderers, 7,928 or 55%
were Black. The murderer rate for Blacks is more than 26 per 100,000,
while the "White" rate is less than 3 per 100,000. A Black
is 9 times as likely to murder as a "White" is.
HISPANIC CRIME IS HIGH: Recall that we said that what the FBI calls
"Whites" is really a conglomeration of Whites,
Hispanics, and others. For data on Hispanic crime, we can look at the
FBI's Supplementary Homicide Report, which lists the
actual data submitted by 10,000 law enforcement agencies before it is
sanitized by the FBI. Five of the states-Arizona, California,
Oklahoma, Oregon, and Texas-still keep track of Hispanic crime as a
separate category. In one year in these five states, we find
under murderers: 1,156 Whites, 2,015 Hispanics, 1,526 Blacks, 134
Asians, and 54 Indians. Adjusted for population, Hispanics are
4.8 times as likely to murder as real Whites are, Blacks are 10 times as
likely to murder, and Indians twice as likely as to murder.
Before we leave the subject of Hispanics, let us briefly mention what
the California Department of Justice reports about murder
and robbery. Of the 2,644 California murderers in 1995, 18% or 467 were
White. California had 1,250 Hispanic murderers and 794
Black murderers. This data shows that in California, as compared to a
White, a Hispanic is 6.1 times as likely to murder, and a
Black is 13.2 times as likely to murder.
A California Hispanic is more than 5 times as likely to commit armed
robbery as a White, and a Black is nearly 20 times as likely
to be an armed robber as a White.
BLACK WOMEN AND MURDER: Removing Hispanics from the FBI's "White"
category exposes another interesting fact. In
the five states keeping track of Hispanic crime, we found that Black
women are actually 5% more likely to murder than White
men are. This is also true in almost all parts of the US where separate
data is kept on Hispanics or where there are too few
Hispanics to obscure the data. For example in seven Southern states,
Black women are 15% more likely to murder than White
men are.
Since we said that in the South, Black women are 15% more likely to
murder than White men are, to be fair we must compare
White women to Black men. In these same seven Southern states, a Black
man is 52 times more likely to murder than a White
woman is. Stated as a percentage, a Black man is 5200% more likely to
murder than a White woman is.
OUTSIDE EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE FBI DATA: Professor Levin [in his 1997
book, "Why Race Matters: Race
Differences and What They Mean"] reviews some of the statistics on Black
criminals that you may have heard. For example, a
Black is 7.8 times as likely to be in prison as a "White." Over 30% of
the Black men between 23 and 29 are imprisoned for a
felony. In major cities, it is worse. At any one time 42% of the Black
males in Washington DC are in jail, on parole, on probation,
or being sought by police. In Detroit, the number is somewhere between
45% and 50%. In Baltimore, it is 56%. Another study
found that in one year, 25% of the Black men in Little Rock, Arkansas
were arrested for a felony. Yet, another study shows that
in the District of Columbia, 85% of the Black males will be arrested at
some point in their life.
INTERRACIAL CRIME: Perhaps the best place to look at interracial crime
is in the South, because the media depicts the South's
Whites as a bunch of violent gun-toting, Black-hating rednecks. In one
year in seven Southern states, Blacks killed 226 Whites
while Whites killed only 66 Blacks. After adjusting the data for
population size, it shows that a southern Black is 11.2 times as
likely to murder as a southern White is. Table 2.8 of the FBI's 1996
Uniform Crime Report, lists interracial crime figures for the
US as a whole. It shows that adjusted for population size, a Black is
nearly 16 times as likely to murder a "White," than visa versa.
Here are some of the results cited in the university studies reviewed by
Dr. Levin. Note that we don't know how each researcher
defined White. One study shows that in the South, a Black is 10 times
more likely to murder a White than visa-versa. A second
study demonstrates that proportionally, Blacks kill 22 times as many
Whites as Whites kill Blacks. A third study shows that Blacks
are about 11 times more likely to rape a White than a White is to rape a
Black. He concludes that evidence exists to support the
stereotype that Black men lust after White women.
Professor Levin cites additional research showing that less than 3% of
White crime is directed against Blacks, while one-half to
two-thirds of the Black wave crime is directed against Whites. In yet
another study, he found that the average Black is 25 times
more likely to assault a White than the average White is likely to
assault a Black.
CRIME
FACT #31: The rate at which Blacks commit murder
is thirteen times that of Whites; Rape and assault,
ten
times. These figures, as given by the F.B.I. reports,
vary somewhat from year to year but fairly represent
the trend for the past decade. (27) (6) (13)
FACT #32: According to the justice Dept, 1 in every
4 Black males between the ages of 20 and 29 is
currently in prison or on probation or parole. (32)
(6)
(3)
FACT #33: Though only 12% of the U.S. population,
Blacks commit more than half of all rapes and
robberies and 60% of all murders in the U.S. (32)
(27) (6)
FACT #34: Approximately 50% of all Black males
will be arrested and charged with a serious felony
during their lifetime. (27)
FACT #35: A Black person is 56 TIMES more likely
to attack a White person than Vice Versa. (3) (32)
FACT #36: Black rapists choose White victims over
half (54.9%) of the time, 30X as often as Whites
choose Blacks. (2) (32) (28)
FACT #37: The annual report from the Department
of justice shows that when Whites commit violence
they do it to Blacks 2.4% of the time. Blacks, on the
other hand, choose White victims MORE THAN
HALF the time. (3)
FACT #38: In New York City, any White is over 300
TIMES MORE LIKELY to be assaulted by a gang of
Blacks than is a Black by a gang of Whites. (32)
FACT #39: Many people argue that high Black
incarceration rates show that police center
enforcement at Black crimes and ignore white-collar
crimes. However, Blacks commit a disproportionate
number of white-collar offenses as well. In 1990,
Blacks were nearly 3 times as likely to be arrested
for
forgery, counterfeiting, and embezzlement as Whites.
(32) (6)
FACT #40: Many people believe that crime is a
product of poverty and lack of "advantages."
However, the District of Columbia, which enjoys the
highest average annual salaries and is second only to
Alaska in personal income per capita, leads the
nation
in just about every category of crime including
murder, robbery, aggravated assault, and vehicle
theft.
D.C. also has the country's strictest gun control,
highest police costs per capita, highest ration of
police
and correctional officers per citizen, and highest
rate
of incarceration. Its permanent population is over
80%
Black. West Virginia, which has the nation's lowest
crime rate, suffers from chronic poverty and has the
highest unemployment in the U.S. It also has the
fewest police per capita. West Virginia is over 96%
White. (33)
SOURCES
1.African Business Magazine, Dec. '91
2.American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, pg
822+
3.American Renaissance, Dec. '90, Box 2504,
Menlo Park, CA 94026
4.American Sociological Review, Vol 45, pg. 859
5.Basham, A.L., The Wonder That Was India,
Grove Press, New York, NY 1954
6.Buckley, William F. syndicated column, Jan. 5.
1993
7."But What about Africa?" Harper's, May '90
8."The Christian Heritage of South Africa Under
Attack!", Peter Hammond, Herald the Coming,
Dec. '92.
9.Coon, Carleton S. The Origin of Races, 1962,
Alfred A. Knopf
10.Fagan, Myron C. How the Greatest White
Nations Were Mongrelized - Then Negroized,
Sons of Liberty Books.
11.Fields, Dr. Ed, The Dangers of Interracial
Marriage, PO Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061
12.Howells, William. Mankind So Far, Doubleday,
Garden City, NY 1945.
13.Harris, Marvin, 1981. Why Nothing Works.
Simon & Schuster, New York, NY
14.Jacob, A. White Man, Think Again! 1965, publ.
by author.
15.Jensen, Arthur R. Bias in Mental Testing, The
Free Press, New York 1980
16.Jensen, Arthur R. Straight Talk About Mental
Tests, the Free Press. (Macmillan) New York,
1981
17.McCall's, May '92, pg 76
18.McGurk, Frank, "A Scientist's Report on Race
Differences." U.S. News and World Report,
Sept. 21, 1956. Washington, D.C.
19.Pearson, Roger, Eugenics and Race, 1966,
Noontide Press
20.Pearson, Roger. Race, Intelligence, and Bias in
Academe, Scott-Townsend Publishers, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
21.Pendell, Elmer, Sex Versus Civilization,
Noontide Press.
22.Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reason, 1961,
Howard Allen Press, Cape Canaveral, FL
23.Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reality, a Search
for Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76,
Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
24.Putnam, Carleton. A Study in Racial Realities,
an address at the University of California at
Davis, Dec. 17, 1964
25.Scott, Ralph. Education and Ethnicity: The U.S.
Experiment in School Integration,
Scott-Townsend. Washington, D.C. 1989
26.Shuey, Audrey H., The Testing of Negro
Intelligence, Social Science Press, New York,
1966
27.Simpson, William Gayley. Which Way Western
Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535,
Washington, D. C. 20007
28.Social Forces, Vol. 69, pg.1+, Sept. '90
29."South Africa: Time to Choose Sides" Soldier of
Fortune, Dec. '89.
30.Snyderman, Mark, and Rothman, Stanely. The
IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy.
Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ
1990.
31.Stell v Savannah-Chattham County Board of
Education, U.S. District Court, Southern
Georgia, May 13, 1963.
32.Taylor, Jared, Paved with Good Intentions: The
Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary
America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY
33.World Almanacs, '88, '89, '90, '91, '92
34.United Nations World Census, 1990
35.Van Loon, Henrick, 1940, Van Loon's
Geography, Garden City Publ.
36.The Voice, Feb. 27, 1990.
37.Waddell, L. A. The Makers of Civilization,
1929, Angriff Press, Hollywood, CA
38.Weisman, Charles A. America: Free, White and
Christian, 1989, SFA, Box 766-c, LaPorte, CO
80535
39.Weisman, Charles A. The Origins of Race and
Civilization, 1990, SFA
40.Weyl, Nathaniel. The Geography of American
Achievement, Scott-Townsend, Washington,
D.C. 1989.
41.Martin Luther King (Man Behind the Myth) by
Des Griffin.
Inter-Racial Crime: The Dirty Little Secret
By John Perazzo
FrontpageMagazine.com | March 20, 2001
IN RESPONSE TO a white-on-black killing in
Brooklyn a few years ago, an
infuriated Al Sharpton instantly took to the
airwaves and proclaimed that such attacks
constituted "a national epidemic."
At the 1996 Million Man March, an impassioned
Jesse Jackson thundered to his huge
black audience, "We're despised. . . . We're
attacked for sport."
The Reverend Herbert Daughtry of New York asserts that white
violence against blacks has rendered
the latter "a hunted and endangered species."
Mary Frances Berry, who chairs the U.S. Civil Rights
Commission,
attributes white-on-black violence to white people's
persistent "belief in the
inferiority of blacks."
Ivy League professor and activist Cornel West calls African
Americans our
country's "exemplary targets of racial hatred."
Given their outspokenness on the subject of interracial crime,
it is indeed noteworthy that none of the
aforementioned individuals -- nor any other prominent civil
rights spokesman in the country, for that
matter -- has had even a word to say about the recent Fat
Tuesday riot that erupted in Seattle. In the
mayhem that occurred there, three-fourths of the rioters were
black, and many of them deliberately
targeted white victims for purely racial reasons. One witness,
for instance, said she observed several
incidents where groups of black men singled out and assaulted
whites, in one case punctuating their
attack with shouts of "That's what you stupid white people
get."
In the most notorious attack, a twenty-year-old white man
named Kristopher Kime was clubbed in the
back of the head as he tried to help an injured female victim
who was lying on the road. The force of the
blow to Kime's head sent him tumbling onto the pavement, where
he was kicked and stomped to death
by several black men. Notwithstanding the brutal nature of
this attack and others, we have heard not
even a whisper of protest from our purported guardians of
"civil rights."
We have heard them utter not even a syllable lamenting the
tragic fact that innocent people were set
upon for no reason other than their skin color. Presumably,
these watchdogs of racism are all busy
attending to matters more pressing. Sharpton, for one, is in
Florida fighting to protect the civil rights of a
black youngster who was recently sentenced to life-in-prison
for the unspeakably barbaric murder and
mutilation of a six-year-old girl. If the awful fate that
befell Kristopher Kime were rare, perhaps the
subsequent silence of our self-anointed civil rights defenders
could be excused. After all, rational people
understand that busy social critics are under no obligation to
publicly denounce every misguided, bigoted
lunatic who happens to do something wicked. Yet such attacks
are by no means rare, but in fact are
alarmingly commonplace.
Each year, some 1.2 million violent crimes involving blacks
and whites occur nationwide. In fully 90
percent of those cases, according to U.S. Justice Department
figures, the perpetrators are black and the
victims are white. Violent white felons choose black victims
for fewer than 3 percent of their attacks,
whereas violent black felons choose white victims about 56
percent of the time. Statistically, the
"average" African American is an astonishing 56 times more
likely to attack a white than vice versa. In
one recent year, approximately 100 black women were raped by
white men; the corresponding number
of white women raped by black men was over 20,000, according
to Dinesh D'Souza in The End of
Racism.
These numbers are staggering. If America were teeming with
white racism, surely the perpetrators of
interracial crime would be disproportionately white. Clearly,
however, that is not at all the case. Though
contemporary civil rights leaders strive to portray
white-on-black crime as commonplace, their rhetoric
rings pathetically hollow. With tortured faces and ostensibly
anguished hearts, they will seek out any
microphone or news reporter willing to publicize their
lamentations about even the rarest instances of
white racism in action. Meanwhile, they turn a deaf ear to the
desperate screams of the thousands of
white -- and black -- victims who fall prey to black
assailants each year.
Consequently unfortunate individuals like Kristopher Kime die
in anonymity, their names fading from
public memory as quickly as their graves are refilled with
earth. Is it not time that the truth of interracial
crime was finally, fearlessly told? Do not all Americans --
black and white alike -- have a right to be
freed from the intellectual shackles of our country's
quintessential frauds, commonly known as "civil
rights crusaders"?
There is more black-on-white than black-on-black violent crime
Of the approxiamtely 1,700,000 interracial crimes of violence involving
blacks and whites, 90 percent are committed by blacks against whites.
Blacks are therefore up to 250 times more likely to do criminal violence
to whites than the reverse.
Blacks commit violent crimes at four to eight times the white rate, and
Asians at one half to three quarters the white rate.
Blacks are twice as likely as whites to commit hate crimes
Hispanics are a hate crime victim catefory but not a perpetrator
category. Hispanic offenders are classigied as whites, which inflates
the white offense rate and gives the impression that Hispanics commit no
hate crimes.
Blacks are as much more dangerous than whites as men are more dangerous
than women.
From "The Color of Crime' available at:
New Century Foundation
2717 Clarkes Landing
Oakton, VA 22124
(703) 716-0900
or go to: http://www.amren.com/colrcrim.html
THE RACE WAR OF BLACK
AGAINST WHITE
Paul Sheehan
From the Sydney
Morning Herald, May 20, 1995
The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is
not over. It has lasted 30 years so far
and claimed more than 25 million victims. It has cost almost as
many lives as the Vietnam War. It
determined the result of last year's congressional election.
Yet the American news media do not want to talk about the Dirty
War, which remains between the lines
and unreported. In fact, to even suggest that the war exists is to
be discredited. So let's start suggesting,
immediately.
No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to
acknowledge or dispute the existence of
a Dirty War, there is nothing ambiguous about what the official
statistics portray: for the past 30 years a
large segment of black America has waged a war of violent
retribution against white America.
And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years,
violent crime has increased more than
four times faster then the population. Young blacks (under 18) are
more violent than previous generations
and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than young
whites.
Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have
not been reported in America:
According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of
crime victims, more than 6.6 million
violent crimes (murder, rape, assault and robbery) are
committed in the US each year, of which
about 20 per cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.
Most victims of race crime - about 90 per cent - are white,
according to the survey "Highlights from
20 Years of Surveying Crime Victims," published in 1993.
Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed,
assaulted or raped by black Americans in
1992, compared with about 132,000 blacks who were murdered,
robbed, assaulted or raped by
whites, according to the same survey.
Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial
crimes than whites even though the black
population is only one-seventh the size of the white
population. When these figures are adjusted on
a per capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity:
blacks are committing more than 50 times
the number of violent crimes of whites.
According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, most
inter-racial murders involve black assailants and white
victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18
times the rate that whites murder blacks.
These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960s,
when there was a sharp increase in
black crime against whites, an upsurge which, not coincidentally,
corresponds exactly with the beginning
the modern civil rights movement.
Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice
Department and FBI statistics indicate that
between 1964 and 1994 more than 25 million violent inter-racial
crimes were committed, overwhelmingly
involving black offenders and white victims, and more than 45,000
people were killed in inter-racial
murders. By comparison 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000
were killed in the Korean war.
When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal
theft) are included, the cumulative
totals become prodigious. The Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27
million non-violent crimes were
committed in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent
of the robberies involved black
offenders and white victims (while only 2 per cent in the reverse).
When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black
Americans have commited at least 170
million crimes against white Americans in the past 30 years. It is
the great defining disaster of American
life and American ideals since World War II.
All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by
assembling the facts in this way, I would be deemed
a racist by the American news media. It prefers to maintain a
paternalistic* double-standard in its coverage
of black America, a lower standard.
Racial Realities
Race And Crime In America
Have you ever noticed that the media rarely tells us about Black crime,
and if they do mention a crime
that has occurred and the perpetrator was a Negro, they would not tell
you or show you? But if a White
commits a crime, especially against a Black, it is the top story for
weeks.
Did you hear about the Negro car-jacker who, just a few months ago,
assaulted and pushed to the ground
a White mother to steal her car? As he was driving away, the young
mother tried to grab her child out of
the back seat, but he got tangled in the seat belts half way out the
door. The Negro took off, dragging the
poor child bouncing on the pavement while the mother was screaming for
the car-jacker to stop. He
didn't. Five miles later, White motorists forced the Negro off the
road-the child was shredded and dead.
Perhaps you heard about that incident just once-maybe not at all.
Of course, if that had been a White man who was the carjacker and killed
a Negro child in the same way
it would have been the major headlines day after day for months. It's a
highly controlled media game to
manipulate your thinking to believe there is no real difference between
races or any racial connection with
crime. They do this by ignoring real Black crime and focusing on the
Whites to make it look like
the Whites are the bad guys.
A study was done in 1983 that showed that on prime time T.V. only about
10% portrayed as criminals
were Black (Rocher, L. and Lickster, R. Prime Time Crime. Washington
D.C.: The Media Initiative.)
The truth is, the media is portraying a lie to you. Here are the facts
they do not want you to know. The
F.B.I. Uniform Crime Reports in the 1990s demonstrate that Negroes
commit 1,200% or 12 times
the per capita robbery rate of White and 900% or 9 times the per capita
murder rate. Interestingly,
the "White" group analyzed included non-White Mexicans, Puerto Ricans
and other Hispanic people. So,
if only Caucasian folks and their crime was compared with Blacks, the
difference would be even greater.
Put another way, Blacks who make up only 12.1% of the population in
America commit 55% of
the murder, whereas Whites (including Mexicans, et. al.) commit 43%. The
murder rate for Blacks is
44.9 per 100,000. For Whites (including non-White elements), the rate is
4.78 per 100,000.
Blacks commit 9 times more rapes than Whites, 8 times more assaults and
19 times more armed
robberies, according to Pat Buchanan.
Jared Taylor in his book Paved With Good Intentions reveals that 60% of
people killed by police are
Blacks, 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are Blacks and 64% of
all arrests for violent crimes are
Blacks.
What about Black on White crime? The lying media would have us believe
that Whites hate Blacks and
commit more crimes against Blacks. Again, the F.B.I. Uniform Crime
Reports for 1993:
* Blacks are 2,200% (22 times) more likely to kill
Whites
than Whites kill Blacks.
* Blacks victimized Whites in armed robbery 167,924
times
versus 7,031 times for Whites against Blacks.
As far as rapes go, in 1991 there were only 100 rapes of Black females
by White men but 20,204 White
women were raped by Black males (U.S. Department of Justice, Sourcebook
of Criminal Justice
Statistics 1991 (1992), Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office).
Why is there grossly disproportionate crime statistics between Blacks
and Whites? Is it poverty that
causes crime? If that is true, then one would expect Black crime to go
down as their standard of living
raises. However, since the civil rights push in the 1960s with
affirmative action, etc., Black crime has
gone up.
Distorted Statistics
Prior to 1986, Hispanics were classified as a distinct and separate
racial
group. Not anymore. The FBI and U.S. Census Bureau no longer distinguish
between Hispanics (who are actually Spanish speaking Indians for the
most
part) and Whites; their crimes are lumped together in one ethnic pot.
The 22,354,059 Hispanics living in the U.S. do not exist, at least not
in
the ethnic sense when it comes to the FBI compiling criminal statistics
for
mainstream and news organizations. Included by the FBI as "WHITES" are
not
only Hispanics, but also West Asians, Jews, Middle Easterners, North
Africans, Iranians, Iraquis, Libyans, Palestinians, and Jewish refugees
from
the former Soviet Union.
The question that immediately comes to mind is: "Why would the FBI and
the U
.S. Census Bureau classify persons of Hispanic origin as being white?"
The
answer might surprise you. The FBI and the U.S. Census Bureau, along
with
mainstream media purposely distort criminal statistics and conveniently
classify Mexican-Americans as white because they do not want the
American
public to know the truth--that Blacks are responsible for committing the
vast majority of crimes here in the United States.
For example, in 1993, there were 20,343 Americans murdered: Blacks, who
compromise 12 percent of the U.S. population, committed 11,686 or a
whopping
58 percent of those murders. The black murder rate was 38.8 per 100,000.
Based on their murder rate in 1986, Hispanics committed an estimated
2,242
murders in 1993. This is 10.7 per 100,000. 76 percent of the U.S. is
White
(European-American) and they committed only 29.5 percent of the murders.
On
the other hand, Black and Hispanic minorities combined constitute 21
percent
of the population, yet they committed a staggering 68.7 percent of the
murders in the U.S. during 1993.
This means, on a per capita basis, a Black person is 12.3 times as
likely to
commit murder as a White person. Since this information is not deemed
"politically correct" and would perhaps offend the black segment of
society,
it is offset by falsely inflating the per capita basis for whites by
backhandedly including Hispanics and other ethnic groups.
Here's the facts on interracial rape:
Jared Taylor, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race
Relations in Contemporary America (New York: Carrol & Graf,
1992), 92-93:
"When whites do violence - rape, murder, assault - how often do
they choose black victims? Shouldn't a nation of bigots target
blacks most of the time? At least half of the time? Of course, it
does not. When whites commit violence, they to it to blacks 2.4
percent of the time. Blacks, on the other hand, choose white
victims more than half the time. (n.317)
In those cases in which the race of the killer is known, blacks
kill twice as many whites as whites kill blacks. Black-on-white
robberies and gang assaults are twenty-one times more common than
white on black. In the case of gang robbery, blacks victimize
whites fifty-two times more often than whites do blacks. (n318)
The contrasts are even more stark in the case of interracial
rape. Studies from the late 1950s showed that the vast majority
of rapes were same-race offenses. Research in Philadelphia
carried out in 1958 and 1960 indicated that of all rapes, only
3.2 percent were black-on-white assaults and 3.6 percent were
white-on-black. Since that time, the proportion of black-on-white
rapes has soared. In a 1974 study in Denver, 40 percent of all
rapes were of whites by blacks, and not one case of
white-on-black rape was found. In general, through the 1970s,
black-on-white rape was at least ten times more common that
white-on-black rape. (n.319)
Because interracial rape is now overwhelmingly black on white, it
has become difficult to do research on it or to find relevant
statistics. The FBI keeps very detailed national records on
crime, but the way it presents rape data obscures the racial
element rather than clarifies it. Dr. William Wilbanks, a
criminologist at Florida International University, had to sift
carefully through the data to find that in 1988 there were 9,406
cases of black-on-white rape and fewer than ten cases of
white-on-black rape. (n.320) Another researcher concludes that in
1989, blacks were three or four times more likely to commit rape
than whites, and that black men raped white women thirty times as
often as white men raped black women.(n.321)
Interracial crime figures are even worse than they sound. Since
there are more than six times as many whites as blacks in
America, it means that any given black person is vastly more
likely to commit a crime against a white than vice versa."
Notes
n. 317. "What Should Be Done," US News & World Report (August
22, 1989), p. 54. See also Department of Justice, Criminal
Victimization in the United States, 1987 (Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1989), p.7.
n. 318. Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the
United States , 1987.
n. 319. Gary D. LaFree, "Male Power and Female Victimization:
Toward a Theory of Interracial Rape," American Journal of
Sociology , Vol. 88, No. 2 (September 1982).
n. 320. William Wilbanks, "Frequency and Nature of Interracial
Crimes," submitted for publication to the Justice Professional
(November 7, 1990). Data derived from Department of Justice,
Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987 , p. 53.
n. 321. Andrew Hacker, Two Nations , pp. 183, 185.
The annual Department of Justice
Victimization Surveys report that
in nine
cases out of ten interracial
violent crime is
perpetrated by blacks on whites.
Figures for 1996 show that on a
per capita
basis, blacks are three times as
likely as
whites to commit crimes driven by
racial
prejudice.
\1999 Total White Black
Violent crime 419,473 248,120 162,264
1999
White population 224,611,000
Black population 34,862,000
Rate of white arrests for violent crimes to white population per 100,000
248,120 / 224,611,000 x 100,000 = 110
Rate of black arrests for violent crimes to black population per 100,000
162,264 / 34,862,000 x 100,000 = 465
Black arrest for violent crimes are 4 times the white arrests.
http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/pdf/t410.pdf
http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/nation/intfile3-1.txt
Black defendants were the most likely
to have a criminal history. Seventy
percent of black defendants compared to
60% of whites and 35% of Hispanics had
previously been convicted. Additionally,
black defendants had more extensive criminal
histories than whites or Hispanics. Of
those defendants with a prior conviction,
34% of blacks had been convicted 5 or more
times compared to 26.4% of whites and 14.2%
of Hispanics.
About 40% of those incarcerated during 1997
were black; 33% Hispanic; 24%, white; and 3%,other racial or ethnic groups.
Hispanic inmates
were among those most likely to report being
involved with opiates, cocaine powder, and
marijuana. Black inmates most often reported
being involved with cocaine powder and crack
cocaine; white inmates, methamphetamine and
marijuana.
----------------------------------------The Bureau of Justice Statistics is
the
statistical agency in the U.S. Department
of Justice. Lawrence A. Greenfeld is
acting director.
BJS Special Reports address a specific
topic in depth from one or more data sets
that cover many topics.
John Scalia wrote this report. Urban
Institute staff, under the supervision of
Laura Winterfield, and Matthew Hickman
of BJS, provided statistical review. Tina
Dorsey produced and edited the report.
Jayne Robinson prepared the report for
final publication.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/fdo99.txt
Of course, I wouldn't expect a bed-wetting liberal such as yourself to find
a common pattern given the above data. Keep running from the truth, wigger;
it's all you have.
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> Well said...one can only hope his simple mind can comprehend it.
He said nothing of substance regarding the topic other than to point out
that he finds it easier to attack the messenger than deal with what they
say; a tactic that you mimic from him. Truth is truth regardless of who says
it.
The fact that Whites outnumber Blacks by an approximately 7 to 1 ratio would
suggest that not only should Whites be committing more murders than Blacks,
but also Whites would be killing more Blacks than Blacks are killing Whites.
Most blacks think that incidences such as the Wichita murders are
"justifiable" due to "racism" and "fo' hunnerd yeers of OHpression".
Kill ratios Averaged for Five Years
B on W W on B
1994 1306 469
1995 1110 454
1996 1077 417
1997 974 343
1998 839 362
----- ------
Total 5306 2045
Average 1061.2 409
White Population in *thousands*
98 97 96 95 94
223,001 221,317 219,623 218,010 216,365
Total 1,098,316,000
Average 219,663,200
Black Population in *thousands*
98 97 96 95 94
34,431 33,973 33,518 33,098 32,654
Total 167,674,000
Average 33,534,800
Black average of White murders / Black average population per 100,000
1061 / 33,534,800 x 100,000 = 3.16
White average of Black murders / White average population per 100,000
409 / 219,663,200 x 100,000 = 0.186
3.16/0.186 = 16.99
BLACKS ARE 17 TIMES (1700%) MORE LIKELY TO KILL WHITES THAN WHITES ARE TO
KILL BLACKS
So, do you think the ratios are insignificant? What if White people killed
blacks at the same rate that blacks killed whites??
Let x = dead negroes killed between 1994-2003
x / 219,663,000 x 100,000 = 3.16
x = (3.16)(219,663,000) / 100,000
x = 6941 per year
6941 x 10 years = 69,410 dead negroes
This is over TEN THOUSAND MORE DEATHS THAN WERE SUFFERED BY AMERICANS DURING
THE ENTIRE VIET NAM WAR.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/ovrace.txt
http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/nation/intfile3-1.txt
I. M. White
> "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>You are textbook 101, booby!
>
> You are subhuman racist slime 101.
>
Let's see.....you are a self-admitted bigot and a proven liar......and yet
you have the audacity to call others names as your only defense of a failed
race you wish to defend. Pitiful.
Brandon_...@hotmail.com
It must SUCK to be an ASS
I. M. White
<Brandon_...@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106520965.0...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> The Truth About Racists...........
>
Actually, I am a realist. Do try and keep up.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It must SUCK to be an ASS
>
That's your only argument in defending the truth I post? A mere opinion?
Pitiful.
On the other hand, you did use "suck" and "ass" in the same sentence;
perhaps there is something you are subconsciously trying to tell us!
GaryG
news:ct1dpa$mnf$0...@pita.alt.net...
>
> <Brandon_...@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1106520965.0...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > The Truth About Racists...........
> >
>
> Actually, I am a realist. Do try and keep up.
>
"Realist"? Ummmm....no. You are a sad person, who blames others for all of
your own problems, and thinks that anyone who disagrees with you is an
elitist liberal. You can't seem to understand that even conservative,
hard-working regular folks, find your viewpoints loathsome and stupid.
(But, perhaps because you find yourself loathsome and stupid, you're OK with
that?).
It's a shame your own life sucks so much, but it's not the fault of blacks,
browns, Jews, homosexuals, etc.
toto
You figures forget that most crime is white on white or
black on black
For 1995
MURDERS AND NONNEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTERS
KNOWN TO POLICE UNITED STATES, 1995
Race of Offender
Race of Victim White Black Total
White 4,124 699 4,823
Black 281 4,422 4,703
Total 4,405 5,121
Forty-eight percent of murder victims are black. The
vast majority of murders are intraracial not interracial.
Among murders involving black and white persons,
ninety percent involve a white killing a white or a
black killing a black. Almost three-quarters of the
rest involve blacks murdering whites, and only a
small handful involve whites murdering blacks.
Since we know that murder occurs during other crimes,
it makes sense that blacks murder whites more since
the violence is likely to be in the course of crimes
against property and more whites *have* that kind
of property. Most murders, however, are crimes of
passion - often between family members and lovers.
These tend to be intraracial crimes since even though
there are interracial families, they are not so common
as ones where people are of the same race.
--
Dorothy
There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..
The Outer Limits
LEROY KNEVIL
ballistic
Mr.Extreme wrote:
> lies on I.M. White aka Tom Shelly
>
> 1. you are a PROVEN coward. ( when asked for an address I.m Chickenshit
> posts a city, a large city with no home
> address...............PUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSY! )
> 2. handicapped. ( bring this up and the gimpy fucker goes ballistic..... I'd
> love to see him in his wheelchair with a broken brake going downhill.)
> 3. Drunkard lush. ( hates that FACT also. He'll avoid the subject like the
> plague....ask him why he got fired from being an airline pilot.....DRUNK!)
> 4. collects femine faggey assed KINKADE prints. ( only known homos and women
> collect such shit)
> 5. Pedo: tried to buy a child with his Tom shelly nym.
> 6. Wannabe Spy: posted spyware in AFN while posting as Tom Shelly.
>
>
>
> More to come.
>
--
I am forged alot! but you will know when it is real or not. I
hate niggers,liberals, whiggers and jews. I love my white race
only!if you suspect a forge then you will know it is either one
of them stupid,black ass
fucking,stinking,dirty,nigger,faggots,child molestors *EXTREME*
OR *GAY CREEPER*!!!..
I DO *NOT* FLAME TOM SHELLY, OR ANY OTHER WHITE MAN IN THIS GROUP!
A DIRTY BLACK NIGGER NAMED *EXTREME* FORGES ME ALL THE TIME!
...."Your most hated racist" LEROY KNEVIL
Bob LeChevalier
>
>"irrelevant traits"????? Is that what you liberals are calling the savage
>criminal behavior of NIGGERS nowadays?
No. it is the physical and historical traits that lead you to decide
that someone warrants the obscene label that are irrelevant.
>You seem to find it easier to attack the messenger than deal with what they
>say.
You have nothing to say.
>Truth is truth regardless of who says it.
"Truth" is for religion and philosophy and ideology.
Bob LeChevalier
>suggest that not only should Whites be committing more murders than Blacks,
>but also Whites would be killing more Blacks than Blacks are killing Whites.
Lets see where that logic takes us:
The fact that women outnumber men by an approximately 51 to 49 ratio
would suggest that not only should women be committing more murders
than men but also women would be killing more men than men are killing
women.
Let's be even more ridiculous:
The fact that women outnumber men by an approximately 51 to 49 ratio
would suggest that not only should women be committing more rapes than
men but also women would be raping more men than men are raping women.
Bill
toto <scar...@wicked.witch> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:07:37 -0500, Tommy <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> >toto wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:14:35 -0500, "I. M. White"
> >> <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Show where he made any mention of "high-crime neighborhoods". Or are you
> >>>conceding to the fact that NIGGERS are indeed violent savages?
> >>
> >> Interestingly, there is a study from the University of Wisconsin which
> >> shows that residents *perceive* crime to be a problem in direct
> >> proportion to the number of young black men who live in the
> >> neighborhood even in neighborhoods which have low rates of
> >> crime.
> >>
> >
> >Are you married to a Black?
>
> No, why?
>
> I lived in a diverse neighborhood that was very low crime though.
> We had a black american neighbor one door to the south (and
> she had a son who was around 25 living there), a Chinese
> American neighbor one door to the north (they had teenagers,
> one boy, one girl), an East Indian neighbor directly across the
> street to the east (they had elementary aged school children),
> a Hispanic neighbor across the street from the Chinese Americans
> (they had teenagers also - my dgd danced with them when they
> were practicing for a friend's Quinzana party).
>
> My husband and I are of Russian and Italian ancestry, respectively.
No point in posting information the bigots don't eant to hear.
Bill
"I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Bob LeChevalier" <loj...@lojban.org> wrote in message
> news:s3t7v0pke52jld7uf...@4ax.com...
> > "I. M. White" <imwhite_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>"Bob LeChevalier" <loj...@lojban.org> wrote in message
> >>news:jhp3v0lvhm596kqa5...@4ax.com...
> >>
> >>> I have no problem admitting that I hate your abhorrent ideas, and
> >>> consider those who post them to be subhuman slime by choice.
> >>
> >>Then by your own definition, you are a self-described bigot.
> >
> > But my "bigotry" is not against anything inherent in *you*, but
> > against your expressed choices and words. It is not considered
> > immoral to find ideas and expressions abhorrent; it is abhorrent to
> > judge people based on irrelevant traits, and not by their words and
> > deeds.
>
>
>
>
> "irrelevant traits"????? Is that what you liberals are calling the savage
> criminal behavior of NIGGERS nowadays? I would beg to differ that the
> victims of typical NIGGER behavior would view it as "irrelevant traits"
>
>
>
> http://www.wichita-massacre.com/
> http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=1912
> http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a5ed080584a.htm
>
>
>
>
> You seem to find it easier to attack the messenger than deal with what they
> say. Truth is truth regardless of who says it.
> Unfortunately, you've been swilling bilge water supplied by the mainstream
> media for so long you're no longer able to recognize the truth.
It seems appropriate to attack those who have no conception of the
proper way to use statistics.
toto
>No point in posting information the bigots don't eant to hear.
I know, but there are lurkers.
I. M. White
As you have repeatedly shown, wiggers clearly do not comprehend the
real-world characteristics of accountability, self-reliance, or
responsibility for one's self. Thanks for making that abundantly clear.
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/index466.htm
Way Back Jack
Black/White Street Crime Ratios:
Murder/neg. msltr.: 5.39/1
Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
Robbery: 6.55/1
Aggravated assault: 2.88/1
Burglary: 2.45/1
The white crime data include Hispanic crime. If Hispanic crime were
removed from white data, the black/white ratio would be even more
extreme.
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
You can't seem to understand that even conservative,
> hard-working regular folks, find your viewpoints loathsome and stupid.
Two words prove you wrong........."white flight". Keep lying to yourself,
wigger; it's all you have.
I. M. White
"toto" <scar...@wicked.witch> wrote in message
news:ekn8v0t7k8udjme9s...@4ax.com...
Date: 25 Dec 2004 18:42:40
The Race War of Black Against White
by Paul Sheehan
from the Sydney Morning Herald
The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is
not
over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25 million
victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War. It
determined the result of last year's congressional election.
Yet the American news media do not want to talk about the Dirty War,
which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even
suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let's start
suggesting, immediately. No matter how crime figures are massaged by
those who want to acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War,
there is nothing ambiguous about what the official statistics portray:
for the past 30 years a large segment of black America has waged a war
of violent retribution against White America.
And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years,
violent crime has increased more than four times faster than the
population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous
generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder
than
young Whites.
Nearly all the following Figures
Which speak for Themselves
Have not been reported in America:
According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime
victims, more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault
and robbery) are committed in the US each year, of which about 20 per
cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.
Most victims of race crime - about 90 per cent - are White, according
to the survey "Highlights from 20 Years of Surveying Crime Victims",
published in 1993.
Almost 1 million White Americans were murdered, robbed, assaulted or
raped by black Americans in 1992, compared with about 132,000 blacks
who were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by Whites, according to
the same survey.
Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes than
Whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the size
of
the White population.
When these figures are adjusted on a per capita basis, they reveal an
extraordinary disparity: blacks are committing more than 50 times the
number of violent racial crimes of Whites.
According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal Bureau
of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black assailants
and White victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times the rate
that Whites murder blacks.
These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960's, when
there was a sharp increase in black crime against Whites, an upsurge
which, not coincidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning of
the modern civil rights movement.
Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice
Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more
than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed,
overwhelmingly involving black offenders and White victims, and more
than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders.
By comparisons 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were
killed
in the Korean war.
When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal
theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The
Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were
committed in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of
the robberies involved black offenders and White victims (while only 2
per cent in the reverse). When all the crime figures are calculated,
it
appears that black Americans have committed at least 170 million
crimes
against white Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining
disaster of American life and American ideals since World War II.
All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling
the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news
media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic double-standard in its
coverage of black America, a lower standard.
Today's liberalism is a mental disease. It's primary cause is the
cowardice born of extreme self-centerdness. Too afraid to admit the
existence of the forces of evil which will stop at nothing less than
genocide, the liberal deludes himself into the comforting fantasy that
these forces of evil are merely victims and that they can be brought
around by 'right action' on the part of the US. The liberal then
blames the US and patriotic Americans for the state of affairs. The
liberal further comforts himself by believing that, in attacking
America, he is battling the forces of evil like a true hero.
Anyone who points to the factual errors in this mode of thinking is
forcing the liberal to confront his own cowardice and irrationality.
That's why they react with such hatred to anyone who disagrees with
their dogma.
As this dogma gets reinforced through decades of repetition in the
media, it gets more and more pronounced. Today's liberals have thus
become traitors whose cowardice has led them to make common cause with
the enemies of America. They have willingly become enemies of America.
I. M. White
"Bill" <ws...@cornell.edu> wrote in message
news:ws21-F7469A.1...@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu...
>
> No point in posting information the bigots don't eant to hear.
You are absolutely right!!!, Self-admitted bigot booby hates to hear the
truth about NIGGERS. Thanks
for pointing that out!
GaryG
I. M. White
"GaryG" <sorryn...@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
What.......you aren't going to deny that white flight exists?!!!! I'm
disappointed in you, wigger. I expected better than a lame opinion void of
truth. Pitiful.
Mr.Extreme
toto wrote:
--
THe HNIC has posted, bitches!!
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 1 Terabyte per Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD
Mr.Extreme
GaryG wrote:
--
GaryG
news:ct4o54$47sf$3...@news3.infoave.net...
> FUCK YOU GIMP NIGGER!!!!!!!!!
It's too bad you have so much hate, anger, and fear within you...it must
suck to live like that.